I'm trying to set the query to send email ONLY when it returns records of blocks and i cant seem to get this going.
declare @blocks varchar(max)
set @blocks = (SELECT spid,
sp.[status],
loginame [Login],
hostname,
blocked BlkBy,
sd.name DBName,
[Code] ....
I've been working with Database Mail for some time but I haven't seen this one before. I have a maintenance plan that does the following:
1. Check database integrity
On Success:
2. Perform backups
On Success:
3. Perform a maintenance cleanup
On Success:
4. Notify operator of success
Steps 1 - 3 are also linked (via On Failure arrows) to a singular Notify Operator of Failure task.
The maintenance plan does exactly what I want it to, and if everything goes correctly, it successfully sends an email to an operator.
If steps 1 - 3 fail, the job ends in an error state, but does not trigger the Notify Operator of Failure task.
I was able to recreate the problem by creating another maintenance plan on the same instance with the same steps. Its "Notify Operator" on failure task also doesn't work.
It occurs to me that maybe I'm missing something, so here's some of the details of my SQL server:
SQL 2008 + SP1 (10.0.2531) x64 on Windows 2008 R2
DB Mail profile is public and default
I do have a slightly unusual profile, in that it uses two accounts:
1. A connection to a SharePoint SMTP service (where it catches emails directed at document libraries)
2. A connection to a UNIX-based smtp server (which routes mail to regular mailboxes and my SQL DBA mailing list)
The Profile will attempt to send to the SharePoint server first. The SharePoint server does not relay. If the document library email address doesn't exist, SQL will raise a warning (in the Database Mail log) and the profile will use the second account on the list, which is a real mail server and can relay the message to any mailbox.
It works really well, actually. When the maintenance plan completes successfully, the message is sent to the drop folder on the SharePoint server, and SharePoint routes the email to the correct library, and we have a central archive of all DB Mail notifications.
But if the job fails (for example, if the backup disk is out of space), none of this happens. According to the log, the job doesn't even try to send a notification. Looking at the DBMail log, the Mail service does not start. No email is delivered to the drop folder of the receiving SMTP server. So I don't think my Database Mail configuration is the problem here. It is apparently something to do with the way the job itself handles errors.
We have a massive database with an almost massive amount of traffic to and from it.
I've been requested to implement a sliding window partitioning with 2 partitions an active and passive 1,I managed to test this on a very small testbed last month.
I currently moved 97k table on to the partition function leaving me another 26 k to go
I'm using the following stored procedure to implement the sliding window
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[ManageFactSlidingWindow](@pFunction nvarchar(max),@pSchema nvarchar(max),@FG nvarchar(max),@moveDays int)
/*****************************************************************************
PROCEDURE NAME: [ManageFactSlidingWindow]
AUTHOR: Arshad Ali
CREATED: 02/24/2013
DESCRIPTION: This stored procedure manages sliding window for the partitioned table
VERSION HISTORY:
DATE EMAIL Company DESCRIPTION
[Code] .....
When I try to move the partition even a single day I get loads of locks.
Is there anyway to find the permissions assigned to user. What level of access the user has in each db and the tables & is he able to see jobs. Each object and permissions
View 6 Replies View RelatedSeveral apps connecting to a SQL 2008 server show the users having a hostname of "Various" when doing an sp_who2 or looking at relevant DMVs.
I joined dm_exec_sessions to dm_exec_connections and was able to get the IP addresses and they resolve back to real clients. So why they'e not displayed and I see "Various" instead?
I am using a SQL server 2008 database.I am working on a windows user.I noticed when I create a user in a database for a login, even that login does not exist in the database, the user is still successful created.I suppose it should error out.
Or I miss something?
I am using this script:
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.database_principals WHERE name = N'mydomainmyuser')
CREATE USER [mydomainmyuser] FOR LOGIN [mydomainmyuser] WITH DEFAULT_SCHEMA=[dbo]
GO
If i create same sp on master and myDB (sp_XYZ with dbo schema) and run exec sp_XYZ which sp_XYZ will execute ,the on master or myDB?
And second question:if i create sp_XYZ in master database only and run exec sp_XYZ from myDB would it execute?
I need to test a block-alert and would like to test this by causing a block on our test server. Anyone have a script handy that will do this?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI just notice that my MASTER database has some user tables and user SP ..and I am thinking to move them to 1 new user database but I am worried it will break something ..
What should I do ?
Moreover I wonder why Transaction log of MASTER can be full ( The recovery model is simple ) It should be fine , isn’t it?
I want that I will allow a user only to select data from any object and only to alter an existing stored procedure or view. That user can not drop and create any stored procedure and view.
I can assign that user db_datareader role, grant view definition but if I grant alter permission, that user can create, alter and drop any stored procedure and view.
I created account with permissions in order my program (I use C#.net) can connect to SQL Server 2008 by this account But I don't want that user can use this account to login to DB by SQL Management Studio for security purpose So how to prevent user login to SQL Management Studio ?
Can I setup "db_denydatareader" to MASTER db to prevent the access ?
I need to run a script in production that adds primary key to a table. Because table is large, I can't run it in one shot, the log file is not so large to accommodate it. Instead, I created a new table with same structure plus new surrogate primary key, and I populate it in a cursor loop.
I already ran it many times in test server, and no problems with that. But the problem will be in production when applications will be accessing this table and try to insert/update it while I am running my loop.
So I am looking for a solution how to block users to access this table, it's OK if they receive an error. Setting database to single user mode will not work because I don't want to block them from all the rest tables in this database.
I have tried everything I found on Google, but nothing seems to be working. Already Ran alter command set multi_user, but getting an error.
"Msg 5064, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Changes to the state or options of database cannot be made at this time. The database is in single-user mode, and a user is currently connected to it.
Msg 5069, Level 16, State 1, Line 1..ALTER DATABASE statement failed."
Hello,we use two instances of the ms sql server 2000 (Version: 8.00.760) on a4 processor windows 2000 (sp 4) machine.A dts-packet on one instance completly blocks the work on the otherinstance. Both instances have 2 dedicated processors. The twoprocessors of the blocked instance are in idle states.How is this possible? Has someone had the same behavior of the sqlserver and found a solution for this problem?Thanks in advance for answersJürgen Simonsen
View 1 Replies View RelatedRecently we had multiple production failures because one database was in single-user mode. I am trying to recreate this scenario to write a script that will kick out that connection that was holding database in single-user.In SSMS window 1 I run the following code:
use master
go
alter database test
set single_user
with rollback immediate
[code]....
Yes, it shows one record, but the database name is master, not test. And indeed, I run it from the context of master. Also tried sp_who, sp_who2, sys.dm_exec_requests - nothing works. For dm_exec_requests it shows nothing because it does not run at the current moment.Any other solutions to catch this SPID with a script?
The requirements are:
1. the user has read-only permissions to dbo tales.
2. the user can do everything within the rpt schema, which contains all objects analyzing dbo tables.
3. the user does not have any permission outside rpt schema, except permissions in #1.
The current solutions are:
1. grant the user select only on dbo tables.
2. make the user the owner of rpt schema.
3. Grant the user database permission on create table/create procedure/create view/create function.
My question is - in step 3, should I just grant "Alter" database permission to the user? Granting Alter seems to be cleaner and simpler. According to MSDN,
"Alter" confers the ability to change the properties, except ownership, of a particular securable. When granted on a scope, ALTER also bestows the ability to alter, create, or drop any securable that is contained within that scope.
I am creating mateialized view but it is failing with error that it can't be schema bound.
The query I am working to create materialized view are having joins with different tables and function.
Is it possible to create Indexed views on user defined functions?
I want to display data in block. Below is the Create,Insert Script and format of desired output.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Test_AA](
[CounterpartID] [varchar](2000) NULL,
[CounterpartName] [varchar](2000) NULL,
[SATName] [varchar](2000) NULL,
[NameOfBO] [varchar](2000) NULL,
[Code] ....
Result Should be like This :
ID:17388
Name:Scottie Berwick
SATName:Scottie Berwick
NameOfBO:
SATAccountNumber:
[Code] ....
This is my first time to deploy an asp.net2 web site. Everything is working fine on my local computer but when i published the web site on a remote computer i get the error "Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to failure in retrieving the user's local application data path. Please make sure the user has a local user profile on the computer. The connection will be closed" (only in pages that try to access the database)
Help pleaseee
Hello,
I have a problem with the notification. I have enabled Database mail and i have created an Operator.
Under SQL Server AgentJobs and then in the job properties i have enabled notification but i don`t receive a mail. Test e-mail works fine but "real" e-mail not.
I have also tried with the Database Maintenance Wizard but even then it just not work.
I have noticed that others have experienced the same problem but i have seen no solution yet.
Could you please help me? What can cause this problem? What`s the best i can do to start searching for the solution? Thanks!
Currently, I have set up a SQL 7.0 database backup job and have one person notified if the job succeeds, but HOW do I choose an option to notify a different person if the job fails ?
Thank you in advance
I can not get SQLServerAgent to Send Mail. Help!
SQLMail started successfully.
In the server agent properties I use the Test button and I receive the
response.
"Successfully started(and stopped) a mail session with this profile."
Indicating that mail should work.
If I send a email notification from a scheduled job it gives me the error:
NOTE: Failed to notify 'operations' via email
In the SQL Server Agent Error log I get.
"[264] An attempt was made to send an email when no email session has been
established"
xp_sendmail works fine.
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
TIA...
Hi Guys,
Is there a way to notify DBA when a new stored procedure,table,view is created by any user...
Help is greatly appericated..
Jessi..
I have a requirement to create a sorted list of objects, stored withinan assembly, and I would like to use a After Insert/Update trigger tonotify that assembly that something has changed, rather than pollingthe database for changes all the time.My initial problem is that I need to create a static list so that itcan be dynamically looked at by other assemblies, but SQL Server won'tallow me to attach a dll which contains a static method.Has anyone done something like this? Are there any decent examplesavailable anywhere?any help will be appreciated.simo
View 4 Replies View RelatedHi,
I am developing desktop application with SQL Server 2005 in C#. I need your help. My Question is "How to notify a Database trigger is executed thru C# application?".
Now I am going to explain clearly. I have a table "Employee" and I created one trigger (it may be INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE) for that table. Then I created a C# application to show a msg box when that table is modified. Now my question is If that table is modified a message box will be shown. I know about trigger (If trigger assigned table is modified that trigger will automatically executed.) But how do i know that trigger is executed thru a C# application. Please send your suggestion or links.
Thanx,
GANESAN MURUGESAN.
Hi all,
I have a VB.NET 2005 application that needs to monitor constantly each change of a field on a SQL server 2005.
Is there a way of setting a trigger up in the SQL Server that notifies the VB.NET application to avoid having the VB.NET apllication querying the SQL table all day for changes?
The table in SQL stores a temperature value. I need the VB.NET application to receive this value everytime there's a change. I could do a timer on the VB.NET application to check for changes in the table every 1 second but I don't think this is efficient. The temperature value may change once every two or three seconds.
The VB.NET application will process the temperature value.
Is there a way of notifying the VB.NET application (which runs from a different server) from within SQL Server? If so, how? If not, what would you go about implementing this?
Thanks again for your comments,
ST
I have two question
1.In SSIS is there a way to unzip the text files
I have set an automated process in sql server agent
I receive ziped text files.I want to unzip the files before loading the data
2.Is there a way to notify when an error occurs in the package in sql server agent.
Please let me know
hi,
there is any way to a bd notify the user by creat a file or send a e-mail or even connect to a ip and send a message when any record is changed ( update/insert/delete)
i have seen a event called triger but i don´t know if is that what i want and i think this event can´t do what i need.
any one can help me?
thanks a lot
I'm running sqlserver 2000 EE on windows nt 4.0 server. We are using
Microsoft outlook express. I would like to setup our sqlserver to
notify me via e-mail when a job finishes.
1) What value should I have for mail profile. Under
sql server age properties.
Please let me know.
Thanks,
Ranjan
I have job in SQL Server 2000 that is setup to notify an email operator upon successful completion.
When I test the notification to the set email operator it sends the email just fine.
When the job is run manually it emails the operator just fine.
When the job is run on a schedule it does not email the operator upon completion. It gives the details in view job history "NOTE: Failed to notify '<operator>' via email.
I have other jobs on the same server that run and notify via email to other operators upon successful completion just fine.
I have parsed MS Technet and the web and did not find anything.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
When my SQL Agent job completes successfully, I'd like to send a notification to QlikView. The idea is to stop QlikView having to constantly check if the job has been run, and just get notified when it needs to update its data.
I don't know how to start. Can the job notifications push a success message to QlikView? I don't think I want to send an email, but something that indicates to QlikView to update the tables.
Hi,
can the Notify Operator Task send the output error message of its predecessor task(e.g Execute T-SQL Statement Task) to the operator? If yes, how?
Thanks,
Greg
Simple question:
I have two servers S1 and S2. Inmediately after new data on S1 is available I want to perform some actions on S2.
I can use a trigger on S1, but if S2 is down the transaction on S1 will be lost. I could use database replication but I only need one single table in S1 to report changes to S2
Is there any other approach I could use?
Thanks.