SQL Server 2008 :: Find All Transaction (insert / Delete / Update) On A Database For A Day?
May 8, 2015i would like to know it's possible to find all transaction(insert, delete,update) on a database for a day. if yes what can i do.
View 2 Repliesi would like to know it's possible to find all transaction(insert, delete,update) on a database for a day. if yes what can i do.
View 2 RepliesI am experimenting with using CDC to track user changes in our application database. So far I've done the following:
-- ENABLE CDC ON DV_WRP_TEST
USE dv_wrp_test
GO
EXEC sys.sp_cdc_enable_db
GO
-- ENABLE CDC TRACKING ON THE AVA TABLE IN DV_WRP_TEST
USE dv_wrp_test
[Code] ....
The results shown above are what I expect to see. My problem occurs when I use our application to update the same column in the same table. The vb.net application passes a Table Valued Parameter to a stored procedure which updates the table. Below is the creation script for the stored proc:
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
if exists (select * from sysobjects where id = object_id('dbo.spdv_AVAUpdate') and sysstat & 0xf = 4)
drop procedure dbo.spdv_AVAUpdate
[Code] ....
When I look at the results of CDC, instead of operations 3 and 4, I see 1 (DELETE) and 2 (INSERT) for the change that was initiated from the stored procedure:
-- GET CDC RESULTS FOR CHANGES TO AVA TABLE
USE dv_wrp_test
GO
SELECT *
FROM cdc.dbo_AVA_CT
GO
--RESULTS SHOW OPERATION 1 (DELETE) AND 2 (INSERT) INSTEAD OF 3 AND 4
--__$start_lsn__$end_lsn__$seqval__$operation__$update_maskAvaKeyAvaDescAvaArrKeyAvaSAPAppellationID
--0x0031E84F000000740008NULL0x0031E84F00000074000230x02119Test26NULL
--0x0031E84F000000740008NULL0x0031E84F00000074000240x02119Test36NULL
--0x0031E84F00000098000ANULL0x0031E84F00000098000310x0F119Test36NULL
--0x0031E84F00000098000ANULL0x0031E84F00000098000420x0F119Test46NULL
Why this might be happening, and if so, what can be done to correct it? Also, is there any way to get the user id associated with the CDC?
I have looked at the membership and roles stored procs from Microsoft and noticed that most of them are wrapped into a transaction. Ok some of the stored procs updated more than one table in which case it makes sense to wrap the code into a transaction. Our stored procs are a little simpler and insert, update or delete only one table for the most part. My question is: What is good practice, should I wrap my stored procs in transactions or because I am only updating one table leave it the way it is, see sample below: Please advise, newbie
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[syl_Category_Insert] @CategoryName nvarchar(64), @LanguageID int
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
BEGIN TRYINSERT INTO [syl_Categories]
VALUES(
@CategoryName,
@LanguageID)
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS [CategoryID]
RETURNEND TRY
BEGIN CATCH
--Execute LogError_Insert SP EXECUTE [dbo].[syl_LogError_Insert];
--Being in a Catch Block indicates failure.
--Force RETURN to -1 for consistency (other return values are generated, such as -6).RETURN -1
END CATCH
END
I have looked at the membership and roles stored procs from Microsoft and noticed that most of them are wrapped into a transaction. Ok some of the stored procs updated more than one table in which case it makes sense to wrap the code into a transaction. Our stored procs are a little simpler and insert, update or delete only one table for the most part. My question is: What is good practice, should I wrap my stored procs in transactions or because I am only updating one table leave it the way it is, see sample below: Please advise, newbie
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[syl_Category_Insert]
@CategoryName nvarchar(64), @LanguageID int
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
BEGIN TRY
INSERT INTO [syl_Categories]
VALUES(
@CategoryName,
@LanguageID)
SELECT SCOPE_IDENTITY() AS [CategoryID]
RETURN
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
--Execute LogError_Insert SP
EXECUTE [dbo].[syl_LogError_Insert];
--Being in a Catch Block indicates failure.
--Force RETURN to -1 for consistency (other return values are generated, such as -6).
RETURN -1
END CATCH
END
Currently we has a database of size about 300G. Because our backup system failed some time past we were left with a transaction log file which grew to about 160G. However our backups are working again and everything is working fine. My understanding is that now the transaction log file is practically empty but the capacity remains at 160G.
When you delete records the deleted transactions are going to get logged to the transaction file. My understanding is when a backup is done these transactions get discarded out of the transaction file.
could I make use of this relatively large transaction file and start deleting transactions without out actually adding to the transaction file size.
The plan is to delete records from logging tables that are not referenced to by any other table without this increasing the transaction log file.For example over a period of a few weeks we can delete a chunk of records from a table. Then after it has completed a backup we can delete another chunk of records out of this table until we have got the table down to the records that we now need.Will this work?
Hello,
Where can i give on the sql server Management studio that i can insert and update, delete.
Thenks for you help
hi. i'm trying to create a c# application which would insert, update and delete data from a database. could anyone pls point me to the right direction in which i should take? thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am creating a website.
i have completed the GUI. i have labels on the left side of the form and a text box for each of those labels on the right side of the form. i have the two dropdown boxes that you have helped me create and bind. now im stuck on how to start the code to get this all working. i know what i need it to do (pseudocode) but dont know how to write the code for it. these books and online sources, really dont say where to put things, they just give examples, not stating where to place it.
I am using a SQL database called Manufacturers
i would like to insert or update, but not delete records wtih this tool
pixelsyndicate mentioned using the GUI to do the code for me, would love to know how to do this.
any help would be awesome, or any good beginner resources would help too
Thanks
I need to create some kind of log file or table that will record whenever an insert, update or delete is made to any table in a database. I have seen triggers that do this kind of thing on a table level. Can this be done with a trigger or a stored procedure on a database level? If so some kind of example or syntax would be great.
TIA.
Mike
If I have a table with 1 or more Nullable fields and I want to make sure that when an INSERT or UPDATE occurs and one or more of these fields are left to NULL either explicitly or implicitly is there I can set these to non-null values without interfering with the INSERT or UPDATE in as far as the other fields in the table?
EXAMPLE:
CREATE TABLE dbo.MYTABLE(
ID NUMERIC(18,0) IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
FirstName VARCHAR(50) NULL,
LastName VARCHAR(50) NULL,
[Code] ....
If an INSERT looks like any of the following what can I do to change the NULL being assigned to DateAdded to a real date, preferable the value of GetDate() at the time of the insert? I've heard of INSTEAD of Triggers but I'm not trying tto over rise the entire INSERT or update just the on (maybe 2) fields that are being left as null or explicitly set to null. The same would apply for any UPDATE where DateModified is not specified or explicitly set to NULL. I would want to change it so that DateModified is not null on any UPDATE.
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded)
VALUES('John','Smith',NULL)
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName)
VALUES('John','Smith')
INSERT INTO dbo.MYTABLE( FirstName, LastName, DateAdded)
SELECT FirstName, LastName, NULL
FROM MYOTHERTABLE
What statement do I use, as part of an insert trigger, to insert xml data from the xml database to a flat file database, to check if a record with a specific ID exists to delete first then insert the changed record, instead of adding the changes or an updated from the original xml database.
What I’m trying to do is take the xml formatted data out of one sql server database and insert the data only in that xml into a another sql database. So I can play with the data.
Problem is if the data in the xml is updated or changed for a specific record on the original xml database then the trigger inserts another copy into the created database (which I don’t want).
This is on SQL Server 2008R2.
this directory is over 2gb
Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server100Setup BootstrapUpdate Cache
can you delete the contents safely?
I have a query that finds all SPID's connected to a particular database:
select d.name, p.*
from sys.databases d join sys.sysprocesses p
on d.database_id = p.dbid
where d.name = 'my_db'
But now we have a new rule that we should not use outdated compatibility views, and one of them is sys.sysprocesses. I checked sys.dm_exec_connections/session/requests but failed to replace my existing code. The first two don't have dbid, the last one, requests, has it, but it selects only currently executing statements.
If a column is set to allow nulls I know that a constraint can be used to supply a default (i.e. GetDate() ) when no value is provided but what about when an explicit NULL is provided in an INSERT or UPDATE statement?Is there any way other then an AFTER trigger to substitute a value for an explicitly provided NULL? In other words, assuming that dtAsof is a NULL enabled column, is there any way to over ride what the following will do to MYTABLE:
INSERT MYTABLE(sCol1, sCol2, sCol3, dtAsOf)
SELECT 'a', 'b', 'c', NULL
If there's no way to do this in SQL Server 2008R2 then what about later versions of SQL Server? Do any more recent versions have a way to deal with this? We have a third party app that uses a SQL Server back end and many of the tables have columns for storing audit like data such as date/time but many are left to NULL values and I'd really like to fix that in as passive a way as possible so as to not break the app that uses the database. I know a constraint with a default can be sued to over ride a null but not when a null is explicitly provided.
Recently I needed to find all processes connected to a particular database, let's call it Test_db. I have a simple query to find all connections to my database:
select *
from sys.databases d join sys.sysprocesses p
on d.database_id = p.dbid
where d.name = 'test_db'
But there was a process that was connected to another database like USE another_db_name; but was actually selecting from tables in test_db. Is it possible to catch such connections?
Is there anyway I can find or make a report if a databases has been accessed/used since last month?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am restoring a database with 10yrs worth of data which have monthly partitions but i would like to keep only 5yrs of data after the restore is done, what is the best/faster approach to delete the 5yrs data without deleting the partitions as that may cause the db in accessible.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am inserting updating few tables from snapshot and reading same bunch of tables from reporting using readcommitted . It is showing some deadlocks i think it is write in this situation as " x" is not compitable with "s" ,"is".
View 4 Replies View RelatedI need to find all uses of special characters in a database. I used the following code to do this:
USE dbName
GO
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb.dbo.#Results') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #Results
GO
[code]...
This will check all tables in the database, but if you want to check specific tables you can uncomment the line in the where clause and specify tables to be checked. The query will return any text fields that have any characters other than letters, numbers or spaces.
This code works fine for me because all the tables in my database have single column primary keys. However I know how much Jeff Moden hates cursors or RBAR queries, so my question is could this have been done by any method other than using a cursor?
The database has approx. 2500 temporary tables. The temp tables match a pattern such as APTMP... I tried deleting the tables in SSMS with the statement, Delete from Information_Schema.tables where substring(table_name,1,5) = 'APTMP' This returns the error message"Ad hoc updates to system catalogs are not allowed".
What is the correct way to delete a group of tables whose name match a pattern from within SSMS?
I had to to relocate the database log file and I issued an Alter database command but by mistake I put a space in the file name as below. The space is at the beginning file name. Now I am unable get the database loaded to SQL Server. The database has 2 replications configured, so deleting and re-attaching the database means the replication needs to be re-configured. Is there an alternative way to issue a command to update the database FILENAME ? Not sure if this can be edited in master database (sys files).
ALTER DATABASE [User_DB]
MODIFY FILE (NAME = User_DB_log, FILENAME = 'I:SQLLogs User_DB_log.ldf')
GO
I have some simple files but they are failing because the delete history task is failing as it is looking for files in a non existent directory.
It is looking for files in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.INSTANCEMSSQLLog whereas it should be looking in C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL10_50.MSSQLSERVERMSSQLLog
how I can get this corrected so I can get the Maintenance Plans to run correctly.
I have tried deleting and recreating the Plan but to no avail
I work with sql server 2008 on a database.we have export schema and datas with the command export datas
click rigth on database => tasks => generate scripts => select all object => click advanced => select type of data to script => schema and data
Now we have a file with all datas and schema That's perfect ...But how i can insert the file in a other database?ok i can copy paste all datas in management studio and press f5 but when i do this the management studio fail because the size of the file is > 200 mega !
Hi All,
I have this project I'm working on it's Product Content Management System rewrite. I got to the point of updating the Product By Sku and not sure if I should use UPDATE statement or I should DELETE sections assosiated with the ProductContentID and then re-insert them again? I'm not sure which is more afficient?
I can really do both and it's really not that complicated, the only problem I see with DELETE then INSERT is the ProductContentSectionId in the Sections table is going to grow very fast and I'm a bit concerned about it.
We use SQL Server 2000 and we have about 4 bound tables where we keep the data. The one I'm talking about is the sections table where we keep the actual types of product content like a BoxShot, Description, Key Features and so on...
Thank you in advance!
Tatyana Hughes
I am trying to update a SQL database with data from a Wang system. The Wang data is dumped to a txt file. I then import it into an update table in SQL via Access. Some of the data is new and some of the data is updated records. At this point I have been trying to create a script to update and add data to a table via the query tool in SQL Then delete data from the update table.
I was able to get the UPDATE and DELETE to work but I have not figured out how to insert new records at the same time? Can I use an IF statement? I will apreciate any help or sample code, Thanks.
UPDATE MemberList
Set Name = NameUpd, Address1 = Address1Upd, Address2 = Address2Upd, City = CityUpd, State = StateUpd, ZipCode = ZipCodeUpd, MemberStatus = MemberstatusUpd
FROM MemberList, MemberListUpd
WHERE MemberList.MemberNumber = MemberListUpd.MemberNumberUpd
INSERT ?
DELETE MemberListUpd
Im trying to keep a mirror image of some data Im getting from Quickbooks.
As the records are inserted into the database I need to check if a record exists and either update or insert a new one.
it seems easier just to delete using the tnxid and reinsert vs updating
my question is if I go
begin
INSERT INTO QBInvoicesQue(100s of feilds)
end
begin
delete from QBInvoices where txnid = @TxnID
end
and there is not matching txnid to delete from will it cause any problems? before going to the insert statement?
begin
INSERT INTO QBInvoices(100s of feilds)
end
I vaguely recall reading an article that I can no longer find that an update statement is executed as a combination of a Delete and an Insert by SQL server. Does anyone know if this a still a true statement in SQL Server 2005?
Thanks,
-shl
I've never worked with a column that's defined as a binary data type. (In the past if ever we had to include a photo we stored a link to the JPG/BMP/PNG/whatever into a column, but never actually inserted or updated a column with binary data.But now I've got to do that. So how do you put data into a column defined as BINARY(4096)?
View 3 Replies View Relatedfor now, doing a small school project, i find doing SPs for Insert useful, like checking for existing data and not inserting, that might not be the best method, i had advice from here i can use unique constraints instead, then what about update and delete? SPs also? the pros make SPs for everything? currently use dynamically generated SQL from SqlDataSources. for Update / delete. some delete are SPs too...
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have recently started an ASP.Net application and am having some issues updating, inserting and deleting rows. When I started working with it, I was getting errors because it could not find any update command. Eventually, I figured out how to automatically generate the commands, by configuring my SQLDataSource control and clicking the "advanced" button. Right now though, I have generated the commands, but I still can not insert, update or delete rows. When I attempt to update anything, I recieve an error that says "The data types text and nvarchar are incompatible in the equal to operator." Nowhere in my table do I have any rows that use the datatype "nvarchar", only "text" and "int". I tried switching all of my text columns to "nvarchar(500)", which did not help. I am led to believe that the auto generated SQL procedures are trying to do something behind the scenes that is making my database act up, because even when I delete rows, I get the same exception, so the datatypes cannot be messed up there, because all that the datasource is doing is deleting rows, therefore there is no need to worry about data types. I only get the error when I check the "Use optimistic concurrency" box. When I do not use optimistic concurrency, I can delete, insert, and update rows... but nothing happens. There are no errors, but nothing is deleted, updated or inserted either. Upon postback, nothing has changed. I may upload a copy of the exact exception page, if someone thinks that it may help. Here is the update command that was generated: UPDATE [Record Information] SET [Speed] = @Speed, [Recording Company] = @Recording_Company, [Year] = @Year, [Artist] = @Artist, [Side 1 Track Title] = @Side_1_Track_Title, [Side 1 Track Duration] = @Side_1_Track_Duration, [Side 2 Track Title] = @Side_2_Track_Title, [Side 2 Track Duration] = @Side_2_Track_Duration, [Sleeve Description] = @Sleeve_Description WHERE [Record Database ID] = @original_Record_Database_ID
Apparently no stored procedures exist for any of these operations, and I am unsure why. The "Record Database ID" is my identity column, and is the only field that is (and is supposed to be) uneditable.
Hi,I just upgraded my ASP.NET 2.0 BETA 2 environment to the final release of ASP.NET 2.0 VWD.Once the update was finished, I could open my website without any problems..... Now, I noticed that in the final release, some modifications have been included in the Membership Stored Procedure and other stored procedures. So I created a new database (SQL Express) and added my data again.After re-creating my SQLDataSources, I tryed to enable the Editing and Deleting option in VWD and once I run my web application, it seems when selecting editing and then update, it doesn't work anymore....This is my code :
<asp:SqlDataSource ID="SqlDataSource1" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:IMMOASPNETDBConnectionString %>"
DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM aspnet_test WHERE (testID = @Original_testID)" SelectCommand="SELECT BuyID, BuyNL, BuyFR, Lastupdated FROM aspnet_Buy"
UpdateCommand="UPDATE aspnet_Buy SET BuyNL = @BuyNL, BuyFR = @BuyFR WHERE (BuyNL = @original_BuyID)">
<DeleteParameters>
<asp:Parameter Name="Original_testID" />
</DeleteParameters>
<UpdateParameters>
<asp:Parameter Name="BuyNL" />
<asp:Parameter Name="BuyFR" />
<asp:Parameter Name="original_BuyID" />
</UpdateParameters>
</asp:SqlDataSource>
<br />
<br />
<asp:GridView ID="GridView1" runat="server" AllowPaging="True" AutoGenerateColumns="False"
DataKeyNames="BuyID" DataSourceID="SqlDataSource1">
<Columns>
<asp:CommandField ShowEditButton="True" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="BuyID" HeaderText="BuyID" InsertVisible="False" ReadOnly="True"
SortExpression="BuyID" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="BuyNL" HeaderText="BuyNL" SortExpression="BuyNL" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="BuyFR" HeaderText="BuyFR" SortExpression="BuyFR" />
<asp:BoundField DataField="Lastupdated" HeaderText="Lastupdated" SortExpression="Lastupdated" />
</Columns>
</asp:GridView>Can someone help me with this ? What is wrong with the Update command ?Thanks to all,Bart
Hello Guys,
I’m trying to create a sqlDataSource using the wizard, I can get the select statement, the here clause and the order by clause but when I click on the Advanced button the options to generate the insert, update and delete statements are not available. Does anyone know what am I doing wrong?
I've got four pages with in the first page a insert, in the second a select, in the thirth a update and in the fourth a delete statement. First the values of a textbox will be inserted in the database, then the values will be shown in labels and than it is possible to edit or delete the values inserted. Every inserted item belonging to each other has one ID. The follwing values has a second ID etc.
How can I make that possible?? I think that I should pass the ID's between the pages so I'm sure that I edit or delete the values that I want. So insert value 1 in page 1, show with select value 1 in page 2, edit or delete value 1 in page 3 and 4.
Maybe I didn't explain it good enough for you, please tell me then!!
Thanks!!