We have around 5 SP’s which are inserting data into Table A,and these will run in parallel.From the temp tables in the SP,data will be loaded to Table A. We are getting deadlock here.No Begin and End Transaction used in the stored procedure.
What could be done to avoid deadlock.
I have Table Staffsubjects
with columns and Values
Guid AcademyId StaffId ClassId SegmentId SubjectId Status
1 500 101 007 101 555 1
2 500 101 007 101 201 0
3 500 22 008 105 555 1
I need to do 3 scenarios in this table.
1.First i need to update the row if the status column is 0 to 1
2.Need to insert the row IF SegmentId=@SegmentId and SubjectId<>@SubjectId and StaffId=@StaffId
3.Need to insert the row IF StaffId<>@StaffId And ClassId=@ClassId and SegmentId<>@SegmentId and SubjectId<>@SubjectId
I have wrote the stored procedure to do this. But the problem is If do the update. It is reflecting in the database by changing 0 to 1. But it shows error like cannot insert the duplicate
Here is the stored Procedure what i have wrote
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[InsertAssignTeacherToSubjects]
@AcademyId uniqueidentifier,
@StaffId uniqueidentifier,
@ClassId uniqueidentifier,
@SegmentId uniqueidentifier,
@SubjectId uniqueidentifier
[Code] ....
I have a SP with Parameters as:
R_ID
P1
P2
P3
P4
P5
I need to insert into a table as below:
R_ID P1
R_ID P2
R_ID P3
R_ID P4
R_ID P5
How can I get this?
Hi everybody, I am having trouble how to fixed this code. I am trying to supply the parameterinside a stored procedure with a value, and displays error message shown below. If I did not supply the parameter with a value, it works. How to fix this?Error Message:Procedure or function <stored proc name> has too many arguments specified.Thanks,den2005
Stored procedure:
Alter PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_GetIdeaByCategory]
@CatId <span class="kwd">int</span> = 0
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
Select I.*, C.*, U.* From Idea I inner join IdeaCategory C on I.CategoryID = C.IdeaCategoryID inner join Users U on I.UserID = U.UserID Where I.CategoryID = @CatId Order By LastModifiedDate Desc
End
oDataSource.ConnectionString = constr;
oDataSource.SelectCommand = storedProc;<span class="cmt">//storedproc - sp_GetIdeaByCategory</span>
oDataSource.SelectCommandType = SqlDataSourceCommandType.StoredProcedure;
oDataSource.SelectParameters.Add(<span class="st">"@CatId"</span>, catId);
gdvCategories.DataSourceID = oDataSource.ID;
gdvCategories.DataBind(); <<--- Error occured here
I am trying to write a stored procedure that is an INSERT INTO <sql table> FROM <other sql tables> WHERE <where clause>.
I need to insert 3 columns from multiples SQL tables into one SQL table. Here is my code snippet:
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_insert_test]
@MID INT OUTPUT,
@CIDINT OUTPUT,
@MemberNVARCHAR OUTPUT
[Code] ....
i cannot pass any of the values to the tblVotings table and not sure how to enter the @MID, @CID and @Member to the INSERT INTO statement.
I'm running SQL server 2000 sp1. I created a stored procedure that (1) drops a table, (2) recreates it with a "select into" statement, (3) alters the table by adding a field, and then (4) updates that field.
The trouble I'm having is that when I execute the stored procedure I get an error stating that I have an "invalid column name" between steps (2) and (3). It seems as though when I drop the table in step (1), the entire procedure wants to re-compile and it can't get past step (4) because the table hasn't been altered yet.
I've noticed a similar problem in editing stored procedures when they refer to tables or fields that don't exist yet because WITHIN the procedure they are created/modified. I'm not able to get a successful syntax check and therefore not able to save my work.
I must be missing something. Any suggestions?
Hey guys, has anyone ever seen this happen:
Try to move stored proc from one DB to another using DTS, errors on create proc. Create proc manually.
Three tables referenced by that stored proc have been dropped and re-created with the same table structure.
I'm not 100% certain that it happened at exactly the same time, but it seems to be around the same time. Any ideas? Anyone seen this happen before?
I have two store rpcedure as shown bellow,
When I run first dt_deadlock2 and then dt_deadlock1 deadlock happend and dt_deadlock1 is discarded by SQL server giving the deadlock message. What is the reason for it ?
CREATE PROCEDURE [agcdb].[dt_deadlock2] AS
BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE t1 SET i = 99 WHERE i = 9
WAITFOR DELAY '00:00:10'
Select * from t1
COMMIT
GO
CREATE PROCEDURE [agcdb].[dt_deadlock1] AS
BEGIN TRAN
UPDATE t1 SET i = 11 WHERE i = 1
COMMIT
GO
Regards
Anil
We just went live today with a production SQL Server 2005 databaserunning with our custom Java application. We are utilizing the jTDSopen source driver. We migrated our existing application which wasusing InterBase over to SQL Server. To minimize the impact to ourcode, we created a stored procedure which would allow us to manage ourprimary key IDs (mimicing the InterBase Generator construct). Nowthat we have 150+ users in the system, we get the following errorperiodically:Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Transaction (Process ID 115) wasdeadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosenas the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.atnet.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.SQLDiagnostic.addDiagnos tic(SQLDiagnostic.java:365)at net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.TdsCore.tdsErrorToken(Td sCore.java:2781)at net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.TdsCore.nextToken(TdsCor e.java:2224)at net.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.TdsCore.getMoreResults(T dsCore.java:633)atnet.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.JtdsStatement.executeSQL Query(JtdsStatement.java:418)atnet.sourceforge.jtds.jdbc.JtdsPreparedStatement.ex ecuteQuery(JtdsPreparedStatement.java:696)at database.Generator.next(Generator.java:39)Here is the script that creates our stored procedure:USE [APPLAUSE]GO/****** Object: StoredProcedure [dbo].[GetGeneratorValue] ScriptDate: 06/12/2007 10:27:14 ******/SET ANSI_NULLS ONGOSET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONGOCREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[GetGeneratorValue]@genTableName varchar(50),@Gen_Value int = 0 OUTASBEGINSET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLEBEGIN TRANSELECT @Gen_Value = GENVALUE FROM GENERATOR WHEREGENTABLENAME=@genTableNameUPDATE GENERATOR SET GENVALUE = @Gen_Value+1 WHEREGENTABLENAME=@genTableNameCOMMIT;SET @Gen_Value = @Gen_Value+1SELECT @Gen_ValueENDThis stored procedure is the ONLY place that the GENERATOR table isbeing accessed. If anyone can provide any guidance on how to avoidthe deadlock errors, I would greatly appreciate it. The goal of thisstored procedure is to select the current value of the appropriaterecord from the table and then increment it, ALL automically so thatthere is no possibility of multiple processes getting the same IDs.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI've got a weird one here. I'm running a DTS package on SQL Server2005. It copies a bunch of stored procedures. I renamed them on theoriginating server and ran the DTS again.The came over with the old name and code!I deleted the DTS and built it from scratch, and the same thinghappened.I ran SELECT * FROM sys.objects where type = 'P' on the source serverand the names were correctI'm explicitly checking which sp to copy rather than using Copy all. Ican see the sp namesI've deleted and recreated the sp on the source server using scriptsI've checked the source server nameI've Refreshed everywhereNothing worksWhy is up_Department_GetAllBySchool trying to be be pulled over whenit doesn't exist?Why is up_Department_GetBySchool not being pulled over when it doesexist?I've heard that SQL 2005 pre-SP2 has a problem where renaming anobject that has a text definition (like sprocs, functions, triggers,views) doesn't update the definition. So if you pull that objectdefinition and run it into your new database, it will use the originalscript, which has the original name.I ransp_helptext 'up_Department_GetBySchool'and checked the CREATE statement at the top. Sure enough, it had theold textI asked our NetAdmin to install SP2 on our server. Then I ransp_refreshsqlmodule 'up_Department_GetForSchool'and got this error:Invalid object name 'up_Department_GetAllForSchool'.So even the code which was supposed to fix it, doesn't. Has anyoneelse had this problem, and managed to fix it?--John Hunter
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a stored procedure and in that I will be calling a stored procedure. Now, based on the parameter value I will get stored procedure name to be executed. how to execute dynamic sp in a stored rocedure
at present it is like EXECUTE usp_print_list_full @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT
I want to do like EXECUTE @SpName @ID, @TNumber, @ErrMsg OUTPUT
Here's a really weird one for any SQL Server gurus out there...We have observed (SQL Server 2000) scenarios where a stored procedurewhich(a) begins a transaction(b) inserts some rows into a table(c) re-queries another table using a subquery which references theinserted table (correlated or not)will deadlock itself at point (c), even when it is the only task onthe server.[I use the term 'deadlock' because I can't think of anything elseappropriate, even though, as stated, this is the ONLY task executing,so this isn't a classical deadlock situation]A typical deadlocking scenario would be (assume insert_table is thetable into which some rows are being inserted)begin transactioninsert insert_table(col....) select (col....) from some_other_table/* this following query will deadlock and never complete */select some_other_table.colfrom some_other_tablewhere not exists (select *from insert_tablewhere some_other_table.col = insert_table.col )Whereas if the offending second query in the sequence is rewritten asa joine.gselect some_other_table.colfrom some_other_tableleft join insert_tableon some_other_table.col = insert_table.colwhere insert_table.col is nullthe query will not deadlock.If the subquery is an aggregate function, a deadlock will also notoccur.If the transaction is committed prior to executing the blocking query,then it will not block (hardly surprising; if it did, there'd be majorproblems with SQL Server!).Note that this is a canonical case of a much more complex SP, and thatsimplified test cases often will not deadlock; you need a significantamount of data, typically 30,000 rows or more to see the problem. Theblocking query is, in real life, used to drive a subsequent tableinsert operation, but this is not relevant to the problem.We conclude that there is some problem, possibly involving cataloguecontention, if a temporary table must be created in a subquery withina transaction in a stored procedure, and if the subquery involvesreferences to a table for which locks have been acquired.Note that the lock timeout will never trigger and a deadlock victim isnever chosen, presumably because the deadlock occurs entirely withinthe same SPID.Locking hints and transaction isolation level setting does not affectthe result. Note also that the exact same queries, executed as a TSQLbatch, do not deadlock; you must place them in a stored procedure.Recovery mode for the database is SIMPLE, and the problem is portableacross databases; it can also be exhibited with MSDE/2000, and isindependent of whether or not the database server is the local machineor not.Has anyone else experienced this problem and/or know of a workaround,other than those mentioned here?. It does look awfully like a bug withSQL Server, since a single task should never be able to deadlockitself, surely.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI'm having a deadlock issue with a SQL Express database and a stored procedure call that ends up adding rows to three different tables, with the following basic heirarchy:
[Top]
|
+-----[Mid]
|
+------[End]
This was originally setup with auto-generated keys at each level, and the psuedo code for the stored procedure that's being called is basically:
begin transaction
insert into TopTable values from openXML
select @topID = scope_identity()
insert into MidTable values from openXML and @topID
insert into EndTable values from openXML and (select ID from MidTable that was just inserted)
commit transaction
Using the profiler there are a few places where the deadlocks occur between the 2nd and 3rd insert, it's always an index lock on the TopTable primary key or the MidTable primary key. The deadlock even occurs if the 3rd insert is taken out. We've tried changing from using autogenerated values to using natural keys, but have a very similar deadlock. Because time was short, we put an application lock in for the production code - it fixes it but testing shows it won't scale very well. The only two other things we've been able to get to work is putting a table lock on each table, or by using natural keys and relaxing the foreign key constraints. The table lock is a no-go because an SSIS package needs to read from the data periodically, and relaxing of the foreign key constraints has it's own problems - though that is where we're currently leaning if we can't come up with some other solution.
My collegues and I have been searching out the issue and working on the problem off and on for the last several days, but we're still a bit stuck. Is there something we've missed? Any pointers to a possible solution?
Following is the deadlock graph data from one of the deadlocks:
Deadlock graph 1379 1 sa 0X01 19 Z014719 2007-03-20 10:10:20.527 <deadlock-list>
<deadlock victim="process5b9c48">
<process-list>
<process id="process5b8c58" taskpriority="0" logused="1268" waitresource="KEY: 7:72057594039304192 (f60073ab7d7b)" waittime="4062" ownerId="48709" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2007-03-20T10:10:16.400" XDES="0x5b8d190" lockMode="S" schedulerid="1" kpid="3640" status="suspended" spid="56" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" transcount="2" lastbatchstarted="2007-03-20T10:10:16.370" lastbatchcompleted="2007-03-20T10:10:16.370" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="Z014719" hostpid="3040" loginname="HTCHCON000307" isolationlevel="read committed (2)" xactid="48709" currentdb="7" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="673316896" clientoption2="128056">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="DeadlockTest.dbo.spWriteTable" line="59" stmtstart="2758" stmtend="4272" sqlhandle="0x030007003ec4c60b2a379700f79800000100000000000000">
insert MidTable (
TopID,
[Name],
[Value])
select
TopID = @TopTableId,
[Name] = r.[Name],
[Value] = r.[Value]
from OPENXML (@hdoc,'/data/top/mid', 1)
WITH ([Name] VARCHAR(50), [Value] int)r</frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
Proc [Database Id = 7 Object Id = 197575742] </inputbuf>
</process>
<process id="process5b9c48" taskpriority="0" logused="624" waitresource="KEY: 7:72057594039304192 (f5009d04c869)" waittime="4062" ownerId="48726" transactionname="user_transaction" lasttranstarted="2007-03-20T10:10:16.400" XDES="0x5bd8860" lockMode="S" schedulerid="1" kpid="3600" status="suspended" spid="59" sbid="0" ecid="0" priority="0" transcount="2" lastbatchstarted="2007-03-20T10:10:16.370" lastbatchcompleted="2007-03-20T10:10:16.370" clientapp=".Net SqlClient Data Provider" hostname="Z014719" hostpid="3040" loginname="HTCHCON000307" isolationlevel="read committed (2)" xactid="48726" currentdb="7" lockTimeout="4294967295" clientoption1="673316896" clientoption2="128056">
<executionStack>
<frame procname="DeadlockTest.dbo.spWriteTable" line="59" stmtstart="2758" stmtend="4272" sqlhandle="0x030007003ec4c60b2a379700f79800000100000000000000">
insert MidTable (
TopID,
[Name],
[Value])
select
TopID = @TopTableId,
[Name] = r.[Name],
[Value] = r.[Value]
from OPENXML (@hdoc,'/data/top/mid', 1)
WITH ([Name] VARCHAR(50), [Value] int)r</frame>
</executionStack>
<inputbuf>
Proc [Database Id = 7 Object Id = 197575742] </inputbuf>
</process>
</process-list>
<resource-list>
<keylock hobtid="72057594039304192" dbid="7" objectname="DeadlockTest.dbo.TopTable" indexname="PK_TopTable" id="lock35dc680" mode="X" associatedObjectId="72057594039304192">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process5b8c58" mode="X"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process5b9c48" mode="S" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
<keylock hobtid="72057594039304192" dbid="7" objectname="DeadlockTest.dbo.TopTable" indexname="PK_TopTable" id="lock35dcb00" mode="X" associatedObjectId="72057594039304192">
<owner-list>
<owner id="process5b9c48" mode="X"/>
</owner-list>
<waiter-list>
<waiter id="process5b8c58" mode="S" requestType="wait"/>
</waiter-list>
</keylock>
</resource-list>
</deadlock>
</deadlock-list>
On SQL 2012 (64bit) I have a CLR stored procedure that calls another, T-SQL stored procedure.
The CLR procedure passes a sizeable amount of data via a user defined table type resp.table values parameter. It passes about 12,000 rows with 3 columns each.
For some reason the call of the procedure is verz very slow. I mean just the call, not the procedure.
I changed the procdure to do nothing (return 1 in first line).
So with all parameters set from
command.ExecuteNonQuery()to
create proc usp_Proc1
@myTable myTable read only
begin
return 1
end
it takes 8 seconds.I measured all other steps (creating the data table in CLR, creating the SQL Param, adding it to the command, executing the stored procedure) and all of them work fine and very fast.
When I trace the procedure call in SQL Profiler I get a line like this for each line of the data table (12,000)
SP:StmtCompleted -- Encrypted Text.
As I said, not the procedure or the creation of the data table takes so long, really only the passing of the data table to the procedure.
We need to create a pdf file from SQL server preferably from a stored procedure. Application will call the stored procedure and it should generate pdf. From my research it appears it can be done using various external tools with licensing/costs. But is it possible to do this within sql server database without additional costs? I read that this can be done by SSRS in SQL server but not sure if it is a good solution and if it is additional licensing..
View 3 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to pass a sum of vars to a SP ?I've tried this but it gives me an error
exec mysp
@param = (@var1 + @var2)
I'm moving data from one database to another (INSERT INTO ... SELECT ... FROM ....) and am encountering this error:
Msg 8114, Level 16, State 5, Line 6
Error converting data type varchar to numeric.
My problem is that Line 6 is:
set @brn_pk = '0D4BDE66347C440F'
so that is obviously not the problem and my query has almost 200 columns. I can go through one by one and compare what column is int in my destination table and what is varchar in my source tables, but that could take quite a while. How I can work out what column is causing the problem?
After my Stored Procedure has run, I need to call [URL] ..... file. Can this be done from my Stored Procedure?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI've been tasked with creating a stored procedure which will be executed after a user has input one or more parameters into some search fields. So they could enter their 'order_reference' on its own or combine it with 'addressline1' and so on.
What would be the most proficient way of achieving this?
I had initially looked at using IF, TRY ie:
IF @SearchField= 'order_reference'
BEGIN TRY
select data
from mytables
END TRY
However I'm not sure this is the most efficient way to handle this.
is it possible to create PW on Stored Procedure? No one can execute or Alter any Store Procedure with Password?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to create a procedure with Restore Database command in many applications in differente platforms. But I can't "use master". How do I do it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a stored procedure that calls several views that rely on each other. In the past these views used to go parallel and use up all 100% of the CPU (12 cores), and now when the same stored procedure runs it only uses 8% of the CPU (1 core). This extends the time spent on the query from roughly 10-15 sec to 2-3min. I'm not quite sure why this is happening.
Are there some obvious things to look at when optimizing views to utilize all cores/threads? Also, it doesn't matter if I set Cost Threshold for Parallelism to 1 or 50 or 5, it is always the same, and I have Max Degree of Parallelism set to 0 as well, which should mean to use all cores when available.
I have a table with the list of all TableNames in the database. I would like to query that table and find any tables used in any stored procedure in that DB.
Select * from dbo.MyTableList
where Table_Name in
(
Select Name
From sys.procedures
Where OBJECT_DEFINITION(object_id) LIKE '%MY_TABLE_NAME%'
Order by name
)
Any way to have a process run that will not write its changes to the transaction log? I have a process that runs every three hours and has a huge impact on the transaction log (it becomes larger than the database itself). We do hourly backups of the transaction log and normally it is reasonably sized but when this process runs, it gets HUGE.
The process takes source data, massages it and writes it to summary tables. It is not something we need to track as we can recreate the summary tables if needed and it has no impact on the source tables.
Everything is driven through a stored procedure. Is there a way to run a stored procedure and tell it that nothing it does should be written to the transaction log?
In a t-sql 2012 stored procedure, I would like to know how I can complete the task I am listing below:
In an existing t-sql 2012 stored procedure, there is a table called 'Atrn' that is truncated every night. The Table 'Atrn' has a column called 'ABS' that is populated with incorrect data.
The goal is to place the correct value into 'ABS' column that is located in the Atrn table while the t-sql 2012 stored procedure is excuting.
**Note: The goal is to fix the problem now since it is a production problem. The entire stored procedure that updates the 'dbo.Atrn' table will be rewritten in the near future.
My plan is to:
1. create a temp table called '#Atrnwork' that will contain the columns called,
Atrnworkid int, and ABSvalue with a double value.
2. The value in the column called Atrnworkid in the '#Atrnwork' table, will obtain its value from the key of the 'Atrn' called atrnid by doing a select into. At the same time, the value for ABSvalue will be obtained by running some sql when the select into occurs?
3. The main table called 'Atrn' will be changed with a update statement that looks something like:
Update Atrn
set ABS = ABSvalue
join Atrn.atrnid = #Atrnwork.Atrnworkid
In all can you tell me what a good solutiion is to solve this problem and/or display some sql on how to solve the problem listed above?
I have made this defination for a stored procedure:
PROCEDURE EP_Conterbalances
@Start_Date_For_Totals_Date DATETIME,
@EmpFilterAddDuty VARCHAR(500),
@CounterBalanceType_id INT,
@dateFrom DATETIME,
[Code] .....
The value of @EmpFilterAddDuty could be:
'SELECT E.EmployeeID FROM dbo.EmployeeGroupMapToEmployee E, dbo.Per_Budget B WHERE E.EmployeeID = B.PER_PERSONAL_ID AND B.PEB_Budget_id = 243 AND E.EmployeeGroupID IN (SELECT H.Id FROM dbo.EmployeeGroup H WHERE H.InstitutionsId = 22) GROUP BY E.EmployeeID '
If i Replace @EmpFilterAddDuty with this in a QUERY, it gives me the expected result, but if i try to execute the stored procedure.:
DECLARE@return_value int
EXEC@return_value = [dbo].[EP_Conterbalances]
@Start_Date_For_Totals_Date = N'20120831',
@EmpFilterAddDuty = 'SELECT E.EmployeeID FROM dbo.EmployeeGroupMapToEmployee E, dbo.Per_Budget B
[Code] .....
I get this error code:
Conversion failed when converting the varchar value 'SELECT E.EmployeeID FROM dbo.EmployeeGroupMapToEmployee E, dbo.Per_Budget B WHERE E.EmployeeID = B.PER_PERSONAL_ID AND B.PEB_Budget_id = 243 AND E.EmployeeGroupID IN (SELECT H.Id FROM dbo.EmployeeGroup H WHERE H.InstitutionsId = 22) GROUP BY E.EmployeeID ' to data type int.
I really do not understand why SQL 2012 tries to convert the value to an int, and I want to know how to pass the text string.
What is the purpose of creating table variable and inserting data into it and selecting from table variable inside of stored proc?
Why can't the stored proc just have select statement instead of creating table variable?
Our developers have gotten this idea lately that instead of having many small stored procedures that do one thing and have small parameter lists that SQL can optimize query plans for, its better to put like 8-10 different queries in the same stored procedure.
They tend to look like this:
create procedure UberProc (@QueryId varchar(50))
as
if @QueryId = 'First Horrible Idea'
begin
select stuff from something
end
if @queryid = 'Second really bad idea'
begin
select otherstuff from somethingelse
end
I see the following problems with this practice:
1) SQL can't cache the query plan appropriately
2) They are harder to debug
3) They use these same sorts of things for not just gets, but also updates, with lots of optional NULLable parameters that are not properly handled to avoid parameter sniffing.
I have this SP
ALTER PROCEDURE GetDelayIntervalData(@start datetime, @stop datetime, @step int)
AS
DECLARE @steps bigint
SET @steps = DATEDIFF(hour, @start, @stop)/ @step
DECLARE @i bigint
SET @i=0
[Code] ....
I have a SQL 2012 database that has 10 tables. One of the tables is populated by manual import from CSV file. Each time a user calls custom ASP.NET code., records get inserted into a table called forecast_data with incremental increase in FileID. So first import has FileID of 1, second import has FileID of 2 etc.
Structure:
TABLE [dbo].[forecast_data](
[recID] [bigint] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[FileID] [int] NULL,
[Project_Name] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[Stoplight_Status] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[Country] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[Region] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[code]....
What I am trying to do is only keep the data that has the highest FileID (MAX(FileID). I would like to write a store procedure that removes all older data once a new import is written into the table.
I have a stored procedure that ends with
Select columnname from tablename order by ordercolumn
We will call that "sp_foldersOfFile". It takes 1 parameter, a fileID (int) value.
The result when I execute this from within Management Studio is a single column of 1 to n rows. I want to use these values in another stored procedure like this:
Select @userCount = COUNT(*) from permissions where UserID = @userID and
(projectid = @projectID or projectid=0) and
clientid = @clientID and
folderpermissions in (dbo.sp_FoldersOfFile(@fileID))
The Stored Procedure compiles but it does not query the folderpermissions in the selected values from the sp_FoldersOfFile procedure. I'm sure it is a syntax issue.
I have table named TEMPLATE_ACTIVITY. This is template table I have 27 this kind of tables.
I want to create stored procedure to change name MICHELIN_US_ instead of TEMPLATE_ all remaining name should be same. For that I am using 'Create Table As Select' to keep same structure as Template tables.
I want to create sp as like execute this way Exec @MICHELIN_US_
So that in future if Client change to MICHELIN_US_ to UNITED_ I can just change Exec @UNITED_
And it will change all table names to UNITED_ACTIVITY
I want to create this SP for different client.
SQL Server 2012 Standard SP 1.
Stored procedure A calls another stored procedure B. Rowcount is set properly in called procedure B, but does not seem to return it to calling procedure A. Otherwise the two stored procedures are working correctly. Here is the relevant code from the calling procedure A:
declare @NumBufferManagerRows int = 0;
exec persist.LoadBufferManager @StartTicks, @EndTicks, @TimeDiff, @NumBufferManagerRows;
print 'BufferManagerRows';
print @NumBufferManagerRows;
Print statement prints @NumBufferManagerRows as 0.
Here is the called stored procedure B:
CREATE PROCEDURE [persist].[LoadBufferManager]
-- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here
@StartTicks bigint,
@EndTicks bigint,
@TimeDiff decimal(9,2),
@NumRows int OUTPUT
[Code] ...