SQL Server 2014 :: Left Join With 2 References
Sep 8, 2015
I need to join 2 tables but the join needs to account for 2 seperate columns.
for example:
select
a. type
a. prod_code
a. prod_type
b. division
from table1 a
left join table2 b
on a. prod_code = b. prod_code
and a. prod_type = b. prod_type
The issue is that you may have only the prod_code or prod_type and null value for the other in table1.
Ideally I want it to check for both then if 1 isn't available then it draws the division of the available. having both or one or the other determines the division it falls under.
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Aug 3, 2015
I have a query that has a left join with a large partitioned table. The partitioned table has 10s of millions of records, and each partition has about 100,000 records.
The left join is part of an insert that gets a column from the partitioned table, if the column exists. The query contains the partition ID and all other joined columns are part of a non-clustered index.
Through the profiler, I found that there were millions of reads and the execution plan was giving me a table scan on the partitioned table.
I changed the query to do the insert followed by an update with inner join. That did the trick, but it worries me that SQL Server 2014 behaves differently from 2012 or 2008R2, which can make upgrading very time consuming.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2014
Looking to improve performance of the following code.
It basically generates future days for each dog. So there is a dog table and a day table with every day.
These 2 table cross join and then fill in missing rows. As time moves i will fill in further future dates but will need the initial insert to be a reasonable query.
All columns are covered by index's but the queries at the end take quite a long time. I would hope for index scan to just point out the missing rows especially on the final query.
How to make the last query as fast as possible.
IF OBJECT_ID('dbo.[AllDates]', 'U') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE dbo.[AllDates]
CREATE TABLE dbo.[AllDates] (
[Date] date not null PRIMARY KEY
)
;WITH Dates AS
[Code] .....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2008
Anyone know why using
SELECT *
FROM a LEFT OUTER JOIN b
ON a.id = b.id
instead of
SELECT *
FROM a LEFT JOIN b
ON a.id = b.id
generates a different execution plan?
My query is more complex, but when I change "LEFT OUTER JOIN" to "LEFT JOIN" I get a different execution plan, which is absolutely baffling me! Especially considering everything I know and was able to research essentially said the "OUTER" is implied in "LEFT JOIN".
Any enlightenment is very appreciated.
Thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2015
Is there any way to enforce table references in stored procedures? For Example, we have stored procedures with a ton of different formats, "dbo.table", "table", "db.dbo.table", etc. Can we make it so that for every stored procedure, the reference must be at least "dbo.table"?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2008
Is there any difference between left join and left outer join in sql server 2000?please reply with example if any?
Thanks in advance
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 14, 2008
Hi,
Whats the diference between a left join and a left outer Join
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2015
I have 10 Gb index and disk space only left 5gb .
How can i rebuild index ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 7, 2014
I got the following problem to solve in TSQL. I don't want to use a cursor. But with the set based solution I am stuck.
Here is my problem:
DECLARE @tmp TABLE (CustomerID INT, CustomerLink INT, PRIMARY KEY(CustomerID))
INSERT @tmp
VALUES(100001,0)
,(100002,100001)
,(100003,100001)
,(100004,100003)
,(100005,100006)
[Code] ....
Desired result:
[CustomerID of a group member],[smallest CustomerID per Group]
|(GroupID)|CustomerID|CustomerLink|
|100001 |100001 |100001 |
|100001 |100002 |100001 |
|100001 |100003 |100001 |
|100001 |100004 |100001 |
|100005 |100005 |100005 |
[Code] .....
doesn't work for crossreferences :.(
RESULTSET:
CustomerID CustomerLink
100001 100001
100002 100001
100003 100001
100004 100001
100005 100005
100006 100006 --wrong
[Code] .....
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2015
I have two xml source and i need only left restricted data.
how can i perform left restricted join?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2015
I was writing a query using both left outer join and inner join. And the query was ....
SELECT
S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname
FROM
Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN
(Production.Products AS P
INNER JOIN Production.Categories AS C
[code]....
However ,the result that i got was correct.But when i did the same query using the left outer join in both the cases
i.e..
SELECT
S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname
FROM
Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN
(Production.Products AS P
LEFT OUTER JOIN Production.Categories AS C
ON C.categoryid = P.categoryid)
ON
S.supplierid = P.supplierid
WHERE
S.country = N'Japan';
The result i got was same,i.e
supplier country productid productname unitprice categorynameSupplier QOVFD Japan 9 Product AOZBW 97.00 Meat/PoultrySupplier QOVFD Japan 10 Product YHXGE 31.00 SeafoodSupplier QOVFD Japan 74 Product BKAZJ 10.00 ProduceSupplier QWUSF Japan 13 Product POXFU 6.00 SeafoodSupplier QWUSF Japan 14 Product PWCJB 23.25 ProduceSupplier QWUSF Japan 15 Product KSZOI 15.50 CondimentsSupplier XYZ Japan NULL NULL NULL NULLSupplier XYZ Japan NULL NULL NULL NULL
and this time also i got the same result.My question is that is there any specific reason to use inner join when join the third table and not the left outer join.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2004
I am getting different results with LEFT outer join operator and *= operator. With *= I am getting the expected results. Can anyone look at SQL and tell what I am doing wrong?
SQL with Left Outer join operator:
select CurrentWeekFinMetrics.[Hub+],
WeeklyMetricsFormat.line#,
WeeklyMetricsFormat.MetricsType,
WeeklyMetricsFormat.Metrics,
WeeklyMetricsFormat.Measure, WeeklyMetricsFormat.jobs, case when dataformatchar is not null then
case when IsPrefix = 'Y' then dataformatchar + convert (varchar, CurrentWeekFinMetrics.displayCol )
else convert (varchar, CurrentWeekFinMetrics.displayCol ) + dataformatchar end
else
convert (varchar, CurrentWeekFinMetrics.displayCol )
end
from WeeklyMetricsFormat LEFT JOIN CurrentWeekFinMetrics on (WeeklyMetricsFormat.Line# = CurrentWeekFinMetrics.Line#)
where CurrentWeekFinMetrics.WeekEndingDate = '10/09/04' and CurrentWeekFinMetrics.[Hub+] = 'Amstelveen'
order by CurrentWeekFinMetrics.[Hub+], WeeklyMetricsFormat.Line#
SQL with *= operator
select CurrentWeekFinMetrics.[Hub+],
WeeklyMetricsFormat.line#,
WeeklyMetricsFormat.MetricsType,
WeeklyMetricsFormat.Metrics,
WeeklyMetricsFormat.Measure, WeeklyMetricsFormat.jobs, case when dataformatchar is not null then
case when IsPrefix = 'Y' then dataformatchar + convert (varchar, CurrentWeekFinMetrics.displayCol )
else convert (varchar, CurrentWeekFinMetrics.displayCol ) + dataformatchar end
else
convert (varchar, CurrentWeekFinMetrics.displayCol )
end
from WeeklyMetricsFormat , CurrentWeekFinMetrics
where CurrentWeekFinMetrics.WeekEndingDate = '10/09/04' and CurrentWeekFinMetrics.[Hub+] = 'Amstelveen'
AND (WeeklyMetricsFormat.Line# *= CurrentWeekFinMetrics.Line#)
For Left outer join operator, I am getting 54 rows, *= I am getting 69 rows.
Thanks and Regards
mb
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
Scenario:
OLEDB source 1
SELECT ...
,[MANUAL DCD ID] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM [dbo].[XLSDCI] ORDER BY [MANUAL DCD ID] ASC
OLEDB source 2
SELECT ...
,[Bo Tkt Num] <-- this column set to sort order = 1
...
FROM ....[dbo].[FFFenics] ORDER BY [Bo Tkt Num] ASC
These two tasks are followed immediately by a MERGE JOIN
All columns in source1 are ticked, all column in source2 are ticked, join key is shown above.
join type is left outer join (source 1 -> source 2)
result of source1 (..dcd column)
...
4-400-8000119
4-400-8000120
4-400-8000121
4-400-8000122 <--row not joining
4-400-8000123
4-400-8000124
...
result of source2 (..tkt num column)
...
4-400-1000118
4-400-1000119
4-400-1000120
4-400-1000121
4-400-1000122 <--row not joining
4-400-1000123
4-400-1000124
4-400-1000125
...
All other rows are joining as expected.
Why is it failing for this one row?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 15, 2015
I'm attempting to improve a vendor created query.
Here is the original -
SELECT m.lID
FROM Message m
inner join Message_Cc mCC on m.lID=mCC.lMessage and mCC.lOfficeRecipient = 200321
INNER JOIN UserRole d on mCC.szRecipient=d.szRoleName
inner Join Map_UserAtOfficeToRole a2 on a2.lUserRole = d.lid AND d.nRecordStatus = 1
[Code] ....
If I run this without the LEFT OUTER JOIN and the is null statement I get 648 rows. But If I include it I get 0 rows. I can't understand why I get 0 rows with the outer join.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2013
Why would I use a left join instead of a inner join when the columns entered within the SELECT command determine what is displayed from the query results?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2015
Why does this right join return the same results as using a left (or even a full join)?There are 470 records in Account, and there are 1611 records in Contact. But any join returns 793 records.
select Contact.firstname, Contact.lastname, Account.[Account Name]
from Contact
right join Account
on Contact.[Account Name] = Account.[Account Name]
where Contact.[Account Name] = Account.[Account Name]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2007
Hi guys,
I'll appreciate any help with the following problem:
I need to retrieve data from 3 tables. 2 master tables and 1 transaction table.
1. Master table TBLOC contain 2 records :
rcd 1. S01
rcd 2. S02
2. Master table TBCODE contain 5 records:
rcd 1. C1
rcd 2. C2
rcd 3. C3
rcd 4. C4
rcd 5. C5
3. Transaction table TBITEM contain 4 records which link to 2 master table:
rcd 1. S01, C1, CAR
rcd 2. S01, C4, TOY
rcd 3. S01, C5, KEY
rcd 4. S02, C2, CAR
I use Left Join & Right Join to retrieve result below (using non-ASNI method) but it doesn't work.
Right Join method:
SELECT C.LOC, B.CODE, A.ITEM FROM TBITEM A RIGHT JOIN TBCODE B ON A.CODE = B.CODE
RIGHT JOIN TBLOC C ON A.LOC = C.LOC
GROUP BY C.LOC, B.CODE, A.ITEM ORDER BY C.LOC, B.CODE
When I use Non-ASNI method it work:
SELECT C.LOC, B.CODE, A.ITEM FROM TBITEM A, TBCODE B, TBLOC C
WHERE A.CODE =* B.CODE AND A.LOC =* C.LOC
GROUP BY C.LOC, B.CODE, A.ITEM ORDER BY C.LOC, B.CODE
Result:
LOC CODE ITEM
-----------------------------
S01 C1 NULL
S01 C2 NULL
S01 C3 CAR
S01 C4 TOY
S01 C5 KEY
S02 C1 NULL
S02 C2 CAR
S02 C3 NULL
S02 C4 NULL
S02 C5 NULL
Please Help.
Thanks.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2015
-- Why is the left table in a LEFT JOIN limited by the where clause on the right table?eg
DECLARE @LeftTable TABLE (LeftID INT NOT NULL IDENTITY(1, 1), LeftValue INT NULL)
INSERT @LeftTable (LeftValue)
VALUES (111)
INSERT @LeftTable (LeftValue)
VALUES (222)
[code]....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2014
I need to find;
Card number and date of borrowers earliest loan for all borrowers who had a loan before the 03/Jan/2004 OR who borrowed a book published before 1920
So far my query looks like this but it is bringing back date out after 03/Jan
select cardno, min(l.dateout)
from loan l right outer join book b
on l.isbn = b.isbn
where b.yearpublished < '1920'
or l.dateout < '03/Jan/2004'
group by cardno
order by cardno;
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2015
How to join 2 heap tables with out any common fields.
for example tbl1 has
col1
1
2
3
4
5
and tbl1 2 has
col2
a
b
c
I want the output like
col1 col2
1 a
2 b
3 c
4
5
is this possible with out using row_number()?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2015
writing a cross join query with one table:
Cities(City_name, X_coordinate, Y_coordinate)
the result should be all combinations without reverse column returns
SELECT * FROM [dbo].[Cities] as P1
Cross JOIN [dbo].[cities] as p2
where (p1.City_name != p2.City_name) and ???
for example if there are three Cities as A,B,C the result should be: A->B, A->C, B->C (without the returns B->A, C->A, C->B)
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2007
I'm trying to join 2 tables. I thought I was getting the correct results but it turns out I'm not.
My Query:
SELECT IVINVA, IVORDN, IVCSLN, IVRESR, IVCITM, CONVERT(varchar(12),CAST(IVIAMT as money),1) AS ExtPrice, CONVERT(varchar(12),CAST(IVPIVC as money),1) AS DistPrice, IVCSUM, IVQYCS, IVDESC, OIRESR, OIDPCT, CONVERT(varchar(12),CAST(IVPIVC - (OIDPCT / 100 * IVPIVC) as money),1) AS NetPrice FROM INVDET1_TBL LEFT JOIN ORDDIS_TBL ON ORDDIS_TBL.OIORDN = INVDET1_TBL.IVORDN AND ORDDIS_TBL.OIRESR = INVDET1_TBL.IVRESR WHERE IVORDN = '0859919' AND IVINVA = '00324024'
Basically, my problem lies in the seonc condition of the LEFT JOIN. I needed to set the two tables equal my item number, because in some situations I need that logic to get the correct result. It most other cases, that item column in the ORDDIS_TBL is NULL, thus giving me the wrong results. In that case, I would want the JOIN to only be ORDDIS_TBL.OIORDN = INVDET1_TBL.IVORDN, and not include the second part. Is there a way I can condition this with an If statement, If ORDDIS_TBL.OIRESR is Null then do this join, if not, then do this? I'm confused how to get the proper result here.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2005
I need to make a left join from the freezefile f, to sped s, instead of having f.studentid = s.id in the where clause. Any help??
select f.studentid, f.studentname, f.sex, fs.mealstatus, s.except, s.lre, r.description, g.testid, g.scale_la, g.scale_ma, t.test_name, t.year
from freezefile f, fsapps fs, sped s, regtb_exception r, gqe_scores g, test_info t
where
f.type = 'ADM'
and
s.except = r.code
and
t.test_name = 'ISTEP'
and
t.year = 2004
and
g.testid = t.testid
and
f.studentid = fs.id
and
f.studentid = s.id
and
f.studentid = g.studentid
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2004
i'm shure it's some smal stiupid mistake bat I can't find it, PLZ help.
1)
select komorka from #plantemp
--result
komorka
09
10
I-P
II-P
III-P
SI/1
SI/2
SI/3
2)
select komorka,ustalenia from analiza_1 a where a.koniec between '20040701'and '20040731'
komorka ustalenia
SI/1788138.9300
SI/246638.4900
SI/216218.4000
08.0000
3)
select p.komorka,isnull(sum(ustalenia),0)
from #plantemp p left join analiza_1 a on p.komorka=a.komorka
where a.koniec between '20040701'and '20040731'
group by p.komorka
komorka ustalenia (sum)
08.0000
SI/1788138.9300
SI/262856.8900
I need all rows from table 1 bat right and left join gives me the same results, WHY
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2007
There are two tables:
tblIndices:
IndexID, Name
1index1
2index2
3index3
.
.
.
tblBasketConstituents
ID, ParentIndexID, ChildIndexID, Weight
121 20
223 80
313 50
412 50
As you can see the ParentIndexID and ChildIndexID fields refer to tblIndices.IndexID
I would like a stored procedure as follows:
show all index names and show the wights for the indexID you passed.
This is what I have so far and it is not correct yet. Not sure what the syntax should be.
alter PROCEDURE [dbo].[uspBasketIndices_Get]
@IndexIDint
AS
select
i.IndexID,
i.[Name],
bc.Weight
from
tblIndices as i left join tblBasketConstituents as bc on i.IndexID = bc.ParentIndexID
and i.IndexID = @IndexID
order by
i.[Name]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2004
Any one know any facts and figures about maximum Left Joins allowed (or recommended) in one query?
I am running a MS SQL 2000 my database is full of relational data and most of my foreign keys (INT data type) are a Clustered Indexed, Usually I will only be pulling one record from collection of about a dozen tables, but the Database is expected to grow fast and become big.
Right now I have a Stored Proc that has eight(8) LEFT JOINs in it. My worry is that this query will kill me as the database approaches 50,000 records.
Lito
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2007
Hi all. My query works fine, it generates reports but not my expected result.
select d.fullname, p.nickname, p.birthdate, p.birthplace,
p.gender, p.civilstatus, p.religion, p.nationality, p. weight, p.height,
p.haircolor, p.eyecolor, p.complexion, p.bodybuilt, p.picture, p.dialectspoken,
d.mobilephone, d.prprovince,[Age] = dbo.F_AGE_IN_YEARS( birthdate, getdate() ),
c.name, c.address, c.telno, c.email, c.occupation, ed.year1, ed.year2, ed.degree, sch.schname
from hremployees as e
inner join psdatacenter as d on e.empdcno = d.dcno
inner join pspersonaldata as p on e.empdcno = p.dcno
left join hrappempcharrefs as c on e.empdcno = c.empdcno
left join hrappempeducs as ed on e.empdcno = ed.empdcno
left join hrsetschools as sch on ed.schoolcode = sch.schcode
the above query gives a 77 records
if i ran "select * from hremployees" generates 60 records
i think the error is in the left joining.
hrappempcharrefs, hrappempeducs and hrsetschools must be left joined to hremployees.
thanks
-Ron-
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2007
Hi Guys,
I started working with linq and vb9.0 but i have a small problem i could feagure how to solve in c# but not in vb
I wanted to make left join or right join on vb 9.0 and linq is it possible or this is only c# feature ?
Waiting to hear from u guys,
Thanks
Softy
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2002
Hello!
I need to write a query using left outer join and I'm having trouble with it.
I have 2 tables:customer and cust_info.
I want to pull all records from customer table and cust_info table even if there is no related data in cust_info table.
But I need one condition in this query:only records from customer table where cus_type in ("A","B","C").
I don't need all other types ("D","E").
So my query looks like this:
select customer.cus_name,customer.cus_address,customer.cu s_type,cus_info.status
from customer
left outer join cus_info ON customer.sxdat_pk = cus_info.sxdat_pk
and cus_type in ("A","B","C")
AND cus_info.cus_table = 'CUSTOMER'
The result should be like this:
cus_name cus_address cus_type status
Amoco 457 bent A new
Bingo 47 lone oak C NULL
Sears 1020 Magic dr. B exist
But my query pulls records for customers with type "D" and "E" that I'm trying to exclude from result.
Please help.
Thanks,
lena
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2008
Hello everybody!!!
I have to left join 2 tables. The first consists of columns:id, description, descr_num.
The second table: id, descr_num, value.
I need to extract description from table1 where descr_num is in the range , say, 1-10.
LEFT JOIN
extract value from table2 ,descr_num should be in the same range. in table2 some values from (1,10) and desc_num could be not present.
BUT i want this left join to be limited as i said.
Is there any solution to this prob. without creating temp tables. Or actually can i do such a join?
Thank you
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2006
Now I have a table with the table design as following :
table cst_EmpProfile
intEmpId nvcEmpName nvcEmpAddress intEmployeeType bitActiv
1 Peter Null Null true
2 Juli 1, xxxx 2 true
3 Sam Null Null False
table cst_EmpType
intEmpType nvcEmployeeType
1 Free Enginner
2 Manager
3 Operator
To join the table but MUST follow the condition as bitActiv = TRUE:
select emp.nvcEmpName, emp.nvcEmpAddress, ety. nvcEmployeeType from cst_EmpProfile emp left join cst_EmpType on emp.intEmployeeTypee = ety.intEmpType and emp.bitActiv = 1.
But, the sql statement doesnt output the my expected result.
Because the data row return must be 1st and 2nd row as it bitActiv = true.
So, how's I going achieve what i want. tq.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2007
Hi, I'm getting the error Syntax error (missing operator) in query expression 'dbPWork.id = dbPWorkWord.work_id LEFT JOIN words ON dbPWorkWord.word_id = words.id'." on the query below. Everything looks in place to me. Do you see anything that shouldn't work?
Query:
Code:
Code:
SELECT DISTINCT dbPWork.id, description_e as description, w_id , dateStart, dateEnd FROM dbPWork
LEFT JOIN dbPWorkW ON dbWork.id = dbPWorkW.work_id
LEFT JOIN words ON dbPWorkW.word_id = words.id
Everything works fine until I add the second LEFT JOIN statement. Any ideas? I'm stumped.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2005
I have a left join that doesn't suit my request.
select * from A
left join B
on A.x=B.x
The problem is that for a specific record in A we can find 1 or more entries in B. What I want is to return only the 1st entry found on B.
thx
View 3 Replies
View Related
