SQL Server 7.0 Database Upgrade To 2000
Feb 9, 2001I would like to upgrade my database from 7 to 2000, are there any white papers or guide i can read. Or dose anyone have advise they can give?
Thanks
I would like to upgrade my database from 7 to 2000, are there any white papers or guide i can read. Or dose anyone have advise they can give?
Thanks
Hi All,
I have just migrated couple of test databases
from SQL Server 2000 to 2005 (side by side).
I also migrated the server level logins using SSIS transfer logins task, available on SSIS 'Transfer logins', I selected all the databases that I have migrated so that I have all database users account in server logins (to avoid orphaned users); but I don't have all the database users in server logins, also the sys.sysusers doesn't have the database users, that I have moved to SQL 2005. Can anybody help?
Also do I need to back up the SQL Server 2000 database and restore it on SQL 2005? What impact this operation can have?
Thanks for your time..
Bidyut
We have Sqlsvr 6.5 under NT4. We want to upgrade the database toSqlsvr 2000 under windows 2K. Is there any way we can do this bycopying the database to the win2K computer?? At any rate wouldsomeone explain how to go about updating this. I know nothing aboutsqlsvr anyversion but do need to know.TIA
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi
We are planning to upgrade the SQL Server in our production environment from SQL Server 2000 to SQL Server 2005. This is a 4 Node cluster environment with 3 Databases on 3 Virtual instances. The main requirement is to achieve this with no/minimal downtime.
Could you please suggest or direct me to any documentation for the best practices used to upgrade such an environment?
Thanks
Priyanka
i am upgrading sql server 2000 database to sql server 2005 database.
I am using backup and restore method to upgrade.
i have an issues transferring the logins..
what is the best why to upgrade?????any info is appreciated..
Dear All..
I have a few databases running a sql2000 and the time as come to move them onto sql2005. Which would be the best route to take.
If I can think back to older version it was just a simply job of doing a backup in it's current version then restore in the new version? and upgrade was taken while restoring.. I could be wrong but any help !!
Thanks
Martin.
I just upgraded a large SQL 2000 database server to SQL 2005, and I have 2 databases that won't attach to the 2005 Server. They are both very small, about 90MB in size, and when I attach them to 2005, the process alternates between running and spinloop status. It can sit forever, and will never complete. I restored backups before the upgrade to a SQL 2000 Server, and reran DBCC CheckDB on both, and got no consistency errors, Updated Stats and indexes, then detached and moved the data files to 2005, and same thing.
View 3 Replies View RelatedSQL 2000 to SQL 2005 Upgrade Error - Database Down - Help Appreciated
I am upgrading a SQL 2000 standard database server to SQL 2005 standard on a windows 2003 server
I am logged in as domain admin and started the upgrade as 'sa'
The upgrade stops with the error:
Service MSSQLSERVICE can not be started. Verify you have sufficient privilages to start system services. The error code is (17185)
The error log shows:
2007-01-04 15:59:38.77 Server Authentication mode is MIXED.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.1399.06 (Intel X86)
Oct 14 2005 00:33:37
Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation
Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server (c) 2005 Microsoft Corporation.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server All rights reserved.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server Server process ID is 4188.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server Logging SQL Server messages in file 'F:SQLDataMSSQLlogERRORLOG'.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server This instance of SQL Server last reported using a process ID of 2980 at 1/4/2007 3:56:58 PM (local) 1/4/2007 2:56:58 AM (UTC). This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server Registry startup parameters:
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server -d F:SQLDataMSSQLdatamaster.mdf
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server -e F:SQLDataMSSQLlogERRORLOG
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server -l F:SQLDataMSSQLdatamastlog.ldf
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server Command Line Startup Parameters:
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server -s MSSQLSERVER
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server SQL Server is starting at normal priority base (=7). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.79 Server Detected 4 CPUs. This is an informational message; no user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:38.83 Server Set AWE Enabled to 1 in the configuration parameters to allow use of more memory.
2007-01-04 15:59:39.02 Server Using the static lock allocation specified in the locks configuration option. Allocated 20000 Lock blocks and 20000 Lock Owner blocks per node. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:39.02 Server Multinode configuration: node 0: CPU mask: 0x0000000a Active CPU mask: 0x0000000a. This message provides a description of the NUMA configuration for this computer. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:39.04 Server Multinode configuration: node 1: CPU mask: 0x00000005 Active CPU mask: 0x00000005. This message provides a description of the NUMA configuration for this computer. This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:39.04 Server Attempting to initialize Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.04 Server Attempting to recover in-doubt distributed transactions involving Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.04 Server Database Mirroring Transport is disabled in the endpoint configuration.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.04 spid7s Starting up database 'master'.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.05 spid7s 1 transactions rolled forward in database 'master' (1). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.07 spid7s 0 transactions rolled back in database 'master' (1). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.07 spid7s Recovery is writing a checkpoint in database 'master' (1). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.08 spid7s SQL Trace ID 1 was started by login "sa".
2007-01-04 15:59:41.08 spid7s Starting up database 'mssqlsystemresource'.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s Using 'dbghelp.dll' version '4.0.5'
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s ***Stack Dump being sent to F:SQLDataMSSQLLOGSQLDump0035.txt
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s SqlDumpExceptionHandler: Process 7 generated fatal exception c0000005 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server is terminating this process.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * *******************************************************************************
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s *
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * BEGIN STACK DUMP:
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * 01/04/07 15:59:41 spid 7
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s *
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s *
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Exception Address = 78144D3A Module(MSVCR80+00014D3A)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Exception Code = c0000005 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Access Violation occurred reading address 0000001E
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s *
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s *
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MODULE BASE END SIZE
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * sqlservr 01000000 02BA7FFF 01ba8000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * ntdll 7C800000 7C8BFFFF 000c0000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * kernel32 77E40000 77F41FFF 00102000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MSVCR80 78130000 781CAFFF 0009b000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * msvcrt 77BA0000 77BF9FFF 0005a000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MSVCP80 7C420000 7C4A6FFF 00087000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * ADVAPI32 77F50000 77FEBFFF 0009c000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * RPCRT4 77C50000 77CEEFFF 0009f000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * USER32 77380000 77411FFF 00092000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * GDI32 77C00000 77C47FFF 00048000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * CRYPT32 761B0000 76242FFF 00093000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MSASN1 76190000 761A1FFF 00012000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Secur32 76F50000 76F62FFF 00013000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MSWSOCK 71B20000 71B60FFF 00041000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * WS2_32 71C00000 71C16FFF 00017000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * WS2HELP 71BF0000 71BF7FFF 00008000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * USERENV 76920000 769E3FFF 000c4000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * opends60 333E0000 333E6FFF 00007000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * NETAPI32 71C40000 71C97FFF 00058000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * SHELL32 7C8D0000 7D0D2FFF 00803000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * SHLWAPI 77DA0000 77DF1FFF 00052000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * comctl32 77420000 77522FFF 00103000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * psapi 76B70000 76B7AFFF 0000b000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * instapi 48060000 48069FFF 0000a000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * sqlevn70 4F610000 4F7A0FFF 00191000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * SQLOS 344D0000 344D4FFF 00005000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * rsaenh 68000000 6802EFFF 0002f000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * AUTHZ 76C40000 76C53FFF 00014000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MSCOREE 61FB0000 61FF4FFF 00045000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * ole32 77670000 777A3FFF 00134000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * msv1_0 76C90000 76CB6FFF 00027000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * iphlpapi 76CF0000 76D09FFF 0001a000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * kerberos 62220000 62277FFF 00058000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * cryptdll 766E0000 766EBFFF 0000c000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * schannel 76750000 76776FFF 00027000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * COMRES 77010000 770D5FFF 000c6000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * XOLEHLP 622E0000 622E5FFF 00006000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MSDTCPRX 622F0000 62367FFF 00078000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * msvcp60 780C0000 78120FFF 00061000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * MTXCLU 62370000 62388FFF 00019000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * VERSION 77B90000 77B97FFF 00008000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * WSOCK32 71BB0000 71BB8FFF 00009000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * OLEAUT32 77D00000 77D8BFFF 0008c000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * CLUSAPI 62390000 623A1FFF 00012000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * RESUTILS 623B0000 623C2FFF 00013000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * DNSAPI 76ED0000 76EF8FFF 00029000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * winrnr 76F70000 76F76FFF 00007000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * WLDAP32 76F10000 76F3DFFF 0002e000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * rasadhlp 76F80000 76F84FFF 00005000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * security 62800000 62803FFF 00004000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * dbghelp 671B0000 672C7FFF 00118000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s *
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Edi: 62FA0040: 62FA0028 671AFFF0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Esi: 0000001E:
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Eax: 0416C05E: C0400096 C0400416 00000416 000062FA 00000000 00000000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Ebx: 0416C040: 0105F270 00002000 00000005 00000000 3368C1E0 00000000
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Ecx: 0105B010: 458B0046 01F88348 00D3850F 458B0000 89C23B50 0F342444
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Edx: 00000000:
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Eip: 78144D3A: 24FFA5F3 144E5495 C78B9078 000003BA 04E98300 E0830C72
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Ebp: 33D6E770: 33D6E790 01C65B97 62FA0040 0000001E 0416C040 0416C6DC
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * SegCs: 0000001B:
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * EFlags: 00010212: 0020006D 00690046 0065006C 005C0073 006F0043 006D006D
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Esp: 33D6E768: 62FA0040 33D6E7A4 33D6E790 01C65B97 62FA0040 0000001E
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * SegSs: 00000023:
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * *******************************************************************************
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2007-01-04 15:59:41.11 spid7s * Short Stack Dump
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 78144D3A Module(MSVCR80+00014D3A)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 01C65B97 Module(sqlservr+00C65B97)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 01CA43B5 Module(sqlservr+00CA43B5)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 01CA452E Module(sqlservr+00CA452E)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 0217D3BD Module(sqlservr+0117D3BD)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 0217B896 Module(sqlservr+0117B896)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 0100889F Module(sqlservr+0000889F)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 010089C5 Module(sqlservr+000089C5)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 010086E7 Module(sqlservr+000086E7)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 010D764A Module(sqlservr+000D764A)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 010D7B71 Module(sqlservr+000D7B71)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 010D746E Module(sqlservr+000D746E)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 010D83F0 Module(sqlservr+000D83F0)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 781329AA Module(MSVCR80+000029AA)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s 78132A36 Module(MSVCR80+00002A36)
2007-01-04 15:59:41.13 spid7s Stack Signature for the dump is 0x2BEDE9E0
2007-01-04 15:59:41.27 spid7s External dump process return code 0x20000001.
External dump process returned no errors.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.27 spid7s Error: 17185, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.27 spid7s Unable to update password policy.
2007-01-04 15:59:41.27 spid7s SQL Trace was stopped due to server shutdown. Trace ID = '1'. This is an informational message only; no user action is required.
Any clues?
Cheers
Paul
Hello, i have a question that the sql server 2000 is install in window 2000 server. If i want to update to window 2003. Is that any problem in sql server 2000. I am worry about whether we will have problem after update. What i need to do? Many thanks.
View 5 Replies View Relatedthe first 2 parts install but the installation fails on the MSDE installation.
It gves me an error like about invalid installation media or something?
I have sql server enterprise.
plz help
I'm running the SQL 2000 upgrade wizard and this error came up in the final phases of the upgrade to SQL 2000. The phase is doing the Export Import of the Table data:
Error: Couldn't connect to the ADMIN$ share on the export machine. Verify that the MSSQLServer Service uses a NT Domain account that is part of the Administrator's group of the export machine and that both machines are in the same domain.
I've checked and service account are in the local admin group and both are in the same resource domain. The service account is in the accounts domain.
I have SQL server 6.5 with service pack 5a. Another machine with W2k and SQL server 2000 with SP3 and disables cnv6x70.dll.
Thanks
Hello,
We've some of the boxes are SQL Server 7.0 with 65 compatability and SQL Server 7.0 with 70 compatability. Now we are planing to upgrade to SQL 2000 with 80 compatability.
My question, how much complicated it is?
Is there any code changes to do in Stored Procs or Triggers or other? and what are the differences?
If lot of code changes, is there any tool to scan stored procedures?
(As we've more 5000 Stored Procedures)
If my question is not clear, let me know.
Thanks!
I have:
Server x with windows 2000 server sp4
It was SQL 2000 STD, when it was originally installed.
Now is SQL 2000 Personal edition SP4.
We dont know how it became sql 2000 personal edition.
We are assuming that an administrator had to re-install SQL and used the wrong CD.
Anybody know of any problems I can find when trying to upgrade to SQL 2000 STD??
Should I un-install and then re-install?
Hi,
I run into a problem which I cannot connect to the database using SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Manager. The SQL Server 2000 was working well until I hook a SQL Server 7.0 application to it. The error message: "General OLE Error 16386, You must upgrade your SQL Enterprise Manager & SQL-DMO (SQLOLE) to SQL Server 2000 (SQLDMO) to connect to this server". I checked fixed in the sp1 for SQL Server 2000, and found no entry. In MS support website and found nothing. Need help from someone who has experience on this. Thanks in Advance.
Eugene
We're upgrading a SQL Server 2000 cluster (Active/Passive) running on Windows 2003 Server 32 - bit Standard to a SQL Server 2005 Cluster running on Windows Server 2003 64-bit Enterprise. Our existent cluster's databases are residing on SAN. We can't purchase new hardware and we have no spare hardware. We also need to move from Windows 2003 32-bit Server to Windows 2003 64-bit Enterprise Server at the same time. We want to keep downtime to a bare minimum.
What we were thinking was the following steps... Anyone try this?
1. Break the link between the servers. Or should we just evict the passive node?
2. Install a fresh copy of windows 2003 64-bit server on one side along with SQL Server 2005. While this step is running, the active node would still be live on Windows 2003 32-bit Server and SQL Server 2000 serving our customers.
3. Bring the active server down.
4. Create new cluster on the newly upgraded server and assign the same cluster name and IP as the original one.
5 Bring the luns from SAN to the newly upgraded server and initialize SQL Upgrade
6. As a final step, the old active node will be rebuilt, we would install a fresh copy of windows 2003 64 - bit server on it and sql server 2005. At this point we would bring it back into the cluster and the cluster would be complete again.
Thoughts?
Hi
I would like to get some advise on the capacity of concurrent users on Access 2000. Here is my situation:
- I have a vb6 application that connects to one database(currently is a access 2000 mdb) via Adodc .
- There will be 6-8 copies of this application running on different PCs and that database is shared .
- All 6 PCs read/write to that database concurrently.
I wonder would Access 2000 be a reliable choice?
Thanks for your time
I am currently using sql server 2000 and I have just installed sql server 2005 in a separate box that will be used as the production server so I will be upgrading to the new database server soon.
I was reading the upgrade options for this situation and one option is to detach the 2000 database, copy the mdf and log files to the new server and attach it to mssql 2005. Another option is to recreate the tables, views, etc. and export/import the data to the new server.
I would like to ask what the best option is for this situation because I am not sure what the advantages and disadvantages of just detaching/attaching and recreating the database in sql server 2005. If I just detach/attach the database, will there be any disadvantage in the performance because the database files were created in 2000 and is functioning because of backward compatibility in 2005? Would it be better to recreate the database in 2005 and import the data from 2000 so that the database would be running in a way that is designed for 2005?
I am not really sure of the differences of these upgrade options so any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
-Voltaire
Hello, I have sql server 2000 personal edition on my PC and I have just got a 2005 DVD. I tried to install it but it is not working. I don't know how to manage my databases. As if there is no graphical managemnt tool. The 2005 is also Personal edition.
I reinstalled the sql 2000, and now I'm trying t upgrade to sql 2005, but still don't know how to do that.
Please someone help me!!!!!!!!!!
Probably this question has been asked hundreds of times and yet netsearch has not generated satisfactory enough answer, at least, to me.And OK, let's assume your organization has more than 200 employees,just one measure to indicate that it's not small and data processingneeds are quite extensive (for both OLTP and OLAP).We've heard so much about concurrency support, stability andperformance. Are there any real persuasive paper out there to talkabout it? Now, let me also put it in another perspective, say, you'rea Microsoft sql server sales guy or gal for that matter for newaccounts. What you got?Thanks.
View 5 Replies View RelatedThis question probably has been asked many a time. And yet I feel itis still relevant for one thing a search on this NG does not produce adesirable answer.It is kind of disappointing that MS would not be able to transfer ERrelationship from an Access db to a SQL Server 7/2000-based one, theupgraded db/imported tables sitting on the SQL Server would not havePKs, say, you have 100 user tables, you have to first recreate PKs foreach of them then set up relationship between/among them, quite timeconsuming. Do you have a better way?Along the same line of the task, what options out there for convertingAccess Modules into SQL Server-based Stored Procedures and/or UDFs?The manual option is sure there, third party tool? I wouldn't trustthem that much though.TIA.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a production failover cluster running SQL Server 2000 at SP3that I want to upgrade to SP4. I do not have a test failover clusterto test with so I need the install on the primary server to work thefirst time. Per the information I have I just install the patch on theprimary server and it will install both on the primary and on thesecondary.However, I remember when I did the initial install and it failed. Thefirst problem traced to the fact that the install uses temporary filesunder the profile of the installing administrator and the id had neverlogged into the second server so the install failed on creating thetemporary file. The was a second problem that related to an OS featurethat had to be off for the install to work.If anyone out there has done this upgrade and remembers encountering aproblem and its fix/workaround I would appreciate a head up warning.Thank you-- Mark D Powell --
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've inherited 6 sql server 2000 boxes. I've upgrade 3 with no trouble. now I have one that gives the message :
"your upgrade is blocked because of cross-language compatibility rules.
For more information about cross-language support, see the version..."
all servers are 2003, sp2. All SQL is Enterprise edition, default language is "english". even the collation order is
the same. why the cross language message? Any help would be good else I'll be forced to rebuild the DB and load application again. ugly!!
dave
Hi,
We have a product which uses SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition with Per Seat licensing option. Going forward with a new release of the product, we intend to upgrade to SQL Server 2005. Till now our product was being used in non web based scenarios so the Per Seat licensing option helped our case. In the upcoming release which would use SQL Server 2005 we need to break off from the non web based scenario as the product would use SQL Server over internet.
So isn't it correct to go for the Processor based licensing instead of the Per seat licensing ?
If so then what would be the ideal manner to upgrade the license from Per Seat (in SQL Server 2000) license type to Processor based (in SQL Server 2005) license type ?
I have heard of Software Assurance providing assistance in version upgrades. Would it help in case I need to upgrade from one license type to another ? Or is it applicable only in case of upgrade where the license type is fixed ?
Thanks in advance.
Cheers,
Arun
Hi all,
My question might be a little bit unusual, but is it possible to upgrade SQL 2005 Express (the free version of SQL) to SQL 2000 Server without any loss of functionality?
Where do I have to pay attention to when doing this?
Thanks in advance!
MMQ
Hi All,
Currently we use SQL 2K SP4 and snapshot replication with a Central Publisher with Remote Distributor toplogy.
I am looking to upgrade or migrate our SQL servers to SQL 2005 and was wondering what is the best way to do this for our replicated architecture?
Is the best way to run the SQL 2005 Upgrade on all 3 servers (publisher, distributor, subscriber) and should it automatically upgrade the servers including the replication components? Is there anything i should consider/watch out for when doing the upgrade and it involves replication (namely snapshot replication)?
Thanks in advance.
I would like to upgrade a production active/passive SQL Server 2000 cluster to SQL Server 2005.
I've read all of the documentation I could find, and doing an in-place upgrade seems to be the way to go. (Despite the fact it scares the hell out of me.
But throughout all the documentation, I've yet to see some simple and fairly important questions answered.
How does the process of upgrading SQL Server work when you're dealing with a cluster?
Do you upgrade one machine then the other? If so, do you upgrade the active node first, or the passive node?
What happens if you're forced to failover from one instance to the other before you've had a chance to upgrade both to 2005? In other words, you failover from 2005 to 2000. Would that even work?
What happens if your upgrades fails for some reason? Is it easy to rollback the installation? If not, will reinstalling SQL Server 2000 cause any issues? Will it remember the previous configuration and simply fix the broken install?
Any help/insight would be greatly appreciated.
In our application we use the ADODB.Recordset.
In SQL server 2000
If there was a view that joined 2 tables and I accessed the view the 2 ID fields in the view would still have the AutoIncrement attribute still set to true so that I knew those were Identity fields.
In SQL server 2005
I dont' know why but if you reference a View that has Identiy AutoInc fields in ADO it doesn't keep those properties.
Also for whatever reason we Set the ID field to 0 to let ourselves know its a new Record. SQL 2000 let it happen and assumed it to be null where as By Setting the ID to 0 in SQL 2005 causes it to blow up on me.
Is there some sort of setting in SQL that can make SQL 2005 work like SQL 2000 in these two instances...
Hello,
I recently upgraded my MSDE server to SQL Server 2000 database. After the upgrade, I see, every minute,in the logfile that the database is starting whilst in Enterprise manager the database is up and running. I would be grateful if you could bail me out of this anomaly.
Hope to hear from you soon.
Regards,
Albert.
I cannot connect to the remote SQL Server 2000 running on this machine that has just been upgraded to the W2003 server. Everything worked perfectly before the upgrade on W2000. All the logins, firewall setting stayed the same. Can ping the machine.
But when trying to register/link, or connect thru ODBC, I got the error
SQL server does not exist or access denied.
We don't have SQL server SP3 installed.
ola
Hi,
I'm trying to upgrade from SQL Server 2000 to 2005. The problem I am having is that when I try to attach the existing db files I get a message that says "database cannot be upgraded because it is read only or has read only files...."
Thing is... there is no write protection on the files.
Can anyone advise me on how to overcome this problem so that I can attach the db, please?
Thank you
Robert
We have 3 MSDE databases (3 seperate servers) which we need to make into one Sql 2000 server (new server). How is this done? Can't find anything clear about this.
Thanks
Hi.
We are going to upgrade one of our SQL Server 2000/Win200 instance to SQL Server 2005/Win2003. Currently, the SQL Server 2000 which contains about 30 database. This is my plan:
Install SQL Server 2005/Win2003 on a new instance
Backup SQL Server 2000 database instance (how do I back all 30 database at the same time?)
Then do a Restore from the SQL Server 2005 instanceIs this a good method or using the "Copy Database Wizard" is better method?
I'm new to this so please advice? Thanks!
I have upgraded our test server and on non cluster production machine. My next server is a cluster and I don't have a test cluster server. Do I upgrade the active node and that is all or am I going to need to fail it over and upgrade the other node.
Also the prerequesite for the upgrade advisor is .net 2.0 I am going to up that on each server one at a time but I am only going to add the upgrade advisor to one node is that ok.
I read the SP1 documentation and it clearly states only patch the active node and do not patch the inactive nodes.