I have a master table with after insert trigger on it.. When record is inserted into master table, the trigger fires and is captured in the backoffice table. In case the trigger fails, my record is neither in the master table nor in the back office table..
Is there anyway to capture the record either in the master table or in a separate table.
We have created a DDL trigger on SQL server 2005 database for DB audit purpose. Following is the script used for trigger creation
USE [master]
GO
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ChangeLog](
[Code] ....
After the DDL trigger creation. Application team started reporting following error while executing a stored procedure.
*********************************
Error 1:
INSERT failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'. Verify that SET options are correct for use with indexed views and/or indexes on computed columns and/or query notifications and/or xml data type methods.
Error2:
[Execute SQL Task] Error: Executing the query "exec sp_drop_indexes_EnhLeaseData delete from dbo.leases where vin_num='XXX' and lease_acct_num='XXXX' delete from dbo.leases where vin_num='XXX' and lease_acct_num='080066225' " failed with the following error: "INSERT failed because the following SET options have incorrect settings: 'ARITHABORT'. Verify that SET options are correct for use with indexed views and/or indexes on computed columns and/or query notifications and/or xml data type methods.". Possible failure reasons: Problems with the query, "ResultSet" property not set correctly, parameters not set correctly, or connection not established correctly.
Here is my table:
My question is: How can I insert a row for each unique TemplateId. So let's say I have templateIds like, 2,5,6,7... For each unique templateId, how can I insert one more row?
I have two tables. Order table and order detail table.
What I want to do is send notification to a service when an order is created. And I want to include both header and detail of the order.
I can't get working with on insert trigger . How to go around with trigger ?
in my environment I am running the SQL Server agent job.i am getting below message.
create a master key in the database or open a master key in the session before performing this operation” error
I have 6 tables which are very huge in row count and need to be partitioned for better manageability.
Little info: Every day, 300 Million records are inserted and 300 million records are deleted in below 7 tables. we maintain only 8 days worth of data in below tables which is the reason records which are older than 8 days are continuously deleted.
Master table which has [ID],[Timestamp]
Table Name: Sample - 2,578,106
Child tables: Foreign key [ID] is common for all the tables. There is no timestamp column in child table.
dbo.ConnectionDB - 1,147,578,048
dbo.ConnectionSS - 876,458,321
dbo.ConnectionRT - 118,133,857
dbo.ConnectionSample - 100,038,535
dbo.Command - 100,032,235
I would like to partition the above child tables based on the IDs that are inserted every 4 hours. Meaning, All IDs that are inserted in 4 hours window should be in a partition.
USE <database>
select * from sys.database_files
and
select * from sys.master_files where database_id= <db id>
give me different size of memory optimized file in <database>
Microsoft SQL Server 2014 - 12.0.2456.0 (X64)
I'm looking for a way to list the target servers associated with a master server. The reason is that we're moving to another master server, and I'd prefer not to move the targets manually.
I've got most of the T-SQL already (sp_msx_enlist, sp_add_jobserver), but I'd like a scripted solution instead of a wizard.
I have a situation where I have Table A, Table B.
View C is created by joining table A and table B.
I have written a instead of trigger D on view C.
I do not insert/update/delete on the view directly.
For every insert/update in table A /B the values should get insert/update in the view respectively. This insert/update on view should invoke the trigger.
And I am unable to see this trigger work on the view if any insert/update occurs on base table level.
Trigger is working only if any operation is done directly on the view.
I am developing an application in vb.net 2005 using SQL Server 2000.
In this I have two tables SessionMaster and SessionChild.
Fields of session master - SessionMastId, Start_Date, End_Date, Session_Type,
Fields of session child - SessionChildId, SessionMastId, UserName, Comment.
SessionMastId and SessionChildId are primary keys of respective tables and also they are auto increment fields.
Please how to write trigger to insert record into both tables at a time.
I use following trigger to stop user "smith" if he try to connect through SSMS to My Server:
create TRIGGER [trg_connection_MyServer]
ON ALL SERVER WITH EXECUTE AS 'Smith'
FOR LOGON
AS
BEGIN
IF ORIGINAL_LOGIN()= 'Smith'
begin
if exists (SELECT 1 FROM sys.dm_exec_sessions
WHERE (program_name like 'Microsoft SQL Server%' and original_login_name = 'Smith') )
ROLLBACK;
end
I want to log this information or send emal incase, this user try to connect through SSMS, so that I can catch it. How can I do this, if I use insert command it rollsback everything and I can't do any activity.
I am trying to create a logon trigger. As I am testing this, I discovered that each time I do a connection, I get 19 rows, inserted into my audit table. I ran profiler, and I see it is going through the logon trigger multiple times, for a single connection. So, what am I doing wrong? The code is fairly simplistic, and the profiler doesn't give a clue, as to what is going on. When I look at the output, I see the spid for the first couple of connections are different, then a spid, that is different from those 2 is in the next 17 rows. But, when I do an sp_who2, that spid does not exist.
This issue was noticed on a 2012 version, that I was first testing on, then had the same issue on a 2008 R2. I am currently testing on a 2014 version, that is doing the same thing. Is the logon trigger itself, firing, and causing this?
I also tried using the After Logon option, and got the same issue.
Here is the code:
CREATE TRIGGER LogonAuditTrigger
ON ALL SERVER WITH EXECUTE AS 'sa'
FOR LOGON
AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @Body NVARCHAR(2000),
[code]....
I am writing a performance baseline test.
The first test writes 5000000 rows in one table. I realise this is not representative OLTP behaviour, but it worked me to start interpreting performance counters and to test several setups to be discussed with our server, storage and network administrators. This way we have been able to compare the results of different hard disks, Lun vs vmdk, 1GB vs 10GB network, AMD vs Intel, etc. This way I can also compare several SQL setups (recovery model, max memory config, ...)
The screenshot shows the results of 2 runs on the same server : Win2012R2, SQL2014, 16GB RAM.
In test 1 min/max server memory was set to 9215MB/10751MB
In test 2 min/max server memory was set to 13311MB/14847MB
The script assures the number of bytes inserted in the nvarchar columns is always the same.
This explains why the number of pages and the number of MB in the table are the same at the end of the 2 tests (column 5 and 6)
Since ca 13GB has to be written, the results of test 1 show the lead time is increasing once more than 10GB has been inserted (column 8 and 9) In addition you can see at that moment
- buffer cache hit ratio is decreasing
- page life expectance becomes "terrible"
- free list stall/sec increases
- lazy writes/sec increases
- readlatency increases (write latency does not)
In test 2 (id 3 in column 1 in the screenshot) those counters are not really influenced (since the 5000000 rows can all be stored in memory).
Now what I do not understand is :
Why the number of pages read (instance level) as well as the number of bytes read and the number of reads (databaselevel) is increasing extremely during run 1.
I expected to see serious impact on write behavior, since SQL server is forced to start flushing dirty pages once memory is filled. Well actually you can see here the number of writes (not the the number of bytes written) starts to increase faster in test 1 after 4000000 rows, but there's no real impact on write latency.
Finally I want to notice
- I'm the only user on this machine
- the table has a clustered index on a identity column
- there are no foreign key constraints
- inserts are executed using a loop, not one big transaction
- to monitor progress and behaviour/impact, each 10.000 loops the counters are stored using dmv queries
So I wonder why SQL Server starts to execute so many reads in test 1.
I am new in SQL Server, What to check ,what action do i need to take while adding a new column to a table.
View 5 Replies View RelatedPreviously same records exists in table having primary key and table having foreign key . we have faced 7 records were lost from primary key table but same record exists in foreign key table.
View 3 Replies View Relatedhow to take backup of indexes for a particular table.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to take backup of indexes for a particular table.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm having problems with the following code:
--DROP MASTER KEY
--GO
USE master;
CREATE MASTER KEY
ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = 'Pass@word1';
GO
USE master;
[code]....
What am I missing? What do I have to do if I get in a situation where I need to back out and start over?
[URL]
I'm getting a replication error that an object (Table) was not found. Any script that can capture this information?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm being asked to create multiple filegroups for a new database based on the table type, transaction, lookup, misc... From what i'm reading this doesn't make sense. I'm reading either large tables get file groups, nonclustered indexes when they are about the same size of the data, or a few other reasons...
First of all, we are talking about the same disk (please don't ask me about how it is configured) and I'm not sure yet if restoring separate file groups is even going to be necessary.
So here are my questions (beyond, the test and see what happens) because in the end I'm going to probably have to do what i'm told. So this is for my professional knowledge.
1. Does file groups separated by table type make sense?
2. Should you put tables that are queried often together in the same or different file groups.
3. I'm pretty sure you can't restore single file group for write access, am I correct?
I am trying to replicate data from a view in the publisher to a table in the subscriber (transaction replication). I do not need the view's base table, or the view itself, replicated to the subscriber. I only want to data from the view to feed a table in the subscriber.
Is this possible?
Running SQL Server 2008 R2 Enterprise.
I have bunch of heap tables and the fragmentation seems to be high, i am not sure whether i shall add index for them, as these tables are inserted and updated every day.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWith all the new functionality, can 2014 now restore a single table from a standard backup without using any third party tools? I have looked, but can't see this listed as a feature (though that doesn't mean it's not there, maybe I've just missed it).
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am having an issue in determining the correct size of a table.
I have a tableA in some DB on transaction server (Enterprise Edition), this table is being replicated in reporting server DB (Standard edition).
When I check the space used by this table in both the databases i see noticeable difference.
I am using EXEC sp_spaceused 'tableA' to determine the space.
Transaction Server
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
name rows reserveddata index_size unused
TableA1439999 695416 KB507048 KB182912 KB 5456 KB
Reporting Server
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
name rows reserveddata index_size unused
TableA1439999 656904 KB483664 KB172680 KB 560 KB
So I wanted to know what could be the possible reasons for this difference ?
I'm trying to find out what tables are being used in a Database.
I don't want the last User but the User and the Dates.
I have a script that return the last user but that is not going to work.
The following script returns the last user but not all users and the Login Name:
ITH LastActivity (ObjectID, LastAction) AS
(
SELECT object_id AS TableName,
last_user_seek as LastAction
FROM sys.dm_db_index_usage_stats u
WHERE database_id = db_id(db_name())
[Code] .....
I want to generate dynamic temp table so, from one strored procedure am getting an some feilds as shown below
CM_id,CM_Name,[Transaction_Month],[Transaction_Year],''[Invoice raised date],''[Payment Received date],''[Payout date],''[Payroll lock date]
for i want to generate table for the above feilds with datatype
I have created a stored procedure for retrieving column name, as shown below
CM_id, CM_Name, [Transaction_Month], [Transaction_Year], [Invoice raised date],[Payment Received date],[Payout date],[Payroll lock date]
Now I am trying to create a temporary table using the above generated coluimns from Stored Procedure with datatype.
I need to do some operations on a table when any user dont work with it.How do i do it?Do i lock the table? and is it possible?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a job scheduled that imports a table from a Oracle database. The job runs at 3am and reports success. But for some reason when i query the table to see how many records there are, I see the same row count as the day before (it should increase everyday- student enrollment). When i execute the package manually, the table updates fine.
SQL Server 2014/Win7 x64.
I know select * into ##tmp1 should work but I get a database connection error.
View 9 Replies View RelatedIn the Operating environment databases, may be made tables in the database on a temporary basis but they are still yet and they are not removed, how to identify tables that have been made on a temporary basis are not used (don’t have any read & write records)?
View 4 Replies View RelatedThe error is "The table with Name of 'Table Name' does not exist.An error occurred when loading the Model."
We get this error when we try to check the properties of an analysis server using SQL Server Management studio. We have resolved this issue twice by Stopping the SQL Server analysis service,removing db folders from Analysis Server Data folder and starting the services back on. The db folder that we removed was advised by the BI team.
The SQL Server Analysis Server is 2012 SP1
Is there any way to enforce table references in stored procedures? For Example, we have stored procedures with a ton of different formats, "dbo.table", "table", "db.dbo.table", etc. Can we make it so that for every stored procedure, the reference must be at least "dbo.table"?
View 1 Replies View Related