I am very confused about the licensing of SQL Server 2000 and 2005 (various editions),
and any light you can shed will be greatly appreciated. I am learning VS2005, and
need to build a website.
1. I know what a Client Access License (CAL) is.
2. I know what a processor license is.
My ASP.NET website might have 10 users, 100, or maybe 1,000 (I don't know at this point).
They will have anonymous access to a main page from which they will have to log in,
and from that point on be using SSL for anything they do.
I am getting conflicting information regarding licensing.
Questions:
1. Can SQL Server 2005 Express support what I need to do? (possibly many users)
2. Other than some of the fancy replication, analysis, etc that Express does not
have, is there a good reason not to use Express Edtion?
3. Regarding SQL Server 2000 or 2005 (NOT Express):
Does a single web application act as a single user thus the
web application requires only one CAL.
In other words: I am the only person who has direct access to the database.
The ASP.NET web application will also have access to parts of the database.
Will this scenario count as 2 "CALs"?
Is there any way to restore a database of higher version to lower version.
E.g. I have created a database in sql server 2012, created some tables & procedures in that.I took Full backup of that database. Can I restore it to sql 2008r2 or any lower version.
I know direct restore is not possible, I have to use either import or export option or generating script,but i want to know is there any easy step to do so.
Since some analysis services features are only available in Enterprise version , I have to upgrade my SQL 2005 server from standard edition to enterpise edition.
So I uninstall originial standard version of analysis service and install a Enterprise version. However, the analysis service is still a standard version after installation.
Is it possible to keep data engine as standard version and install a enterprise version of analysis service?
Hello,I have been searching and reading a lots of information on the microsoft website about the different version of SQL server, but still can not make my decision.In term of performance, is there a real big difference between the workgroup and the standard version? The workgroup is limited to 3 GB of RAM while the standard is unlimited, would that really change the performance if my server has 16Gb or RAM?The price difference is pretty substantial so if could only have to buy the workgroup , it would be better.One more question, regarding the type of licence, my server has 2 processors, could I avoid buying 2 licences and get the Server plus CAL instead. I am using this server to host 4 web-application running on SQL server. Each database is about 15 MB.Thanks in adavance for your advises.Arno
I am wondering if it is possible to change from SQL Server Enterprise Evaluation Version to Developer Version. The reason is because the Enterprise Evaluation version expires after 180 days. So if I create reports and cubes in Enterprise Evaluation I can import them into Developer Edition right? Should I remove the Enterprise Evaluation version after 180 days or leave it then install Developer Edition?
I have tried to attatch a database ,created by SQL server Express within a C# application , in SQL server 2005 Enterprise edition, but the following error message appears:
-----------------------------
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio ------------------------------
Attach database failed for Server 'MEDO'. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft SQL Server&ProdVer=9.00.1187.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText&EvtID=Attach database+Server&LinkId=20476
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
The database 'E:X.MDF' cannot be opened because it is version 611. This server supports version 607 and earlier. A downgrade path is not supported. Could not open new database 'E:X.MDF'. CREATE DATABASE is aborted. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 948)
------------------------------
so , how can I solve this problem , I need to reed the data resides in the tables of 'X' database , how can I do it?? please help me.
We have a 64bit os machine that we accidently loaded the 32 bit version of sql server on. We now want to upgrade it to 64 bit sql server, but we now have a production database on it. My understanding is that all I have to do is detach the production database, upgrade to 64bit sql server, then reattach the database. Is this really all I have to do?
Can some one here give me more insight about how to upgrade a SQL Server 2005 Standard Version (32 bits) to a SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Version (32 bits) as default instance on a Windows 2003 enterprise OS (32 bits). I want to know what is the easist way and what is the safest way. May I preserve some settings I have for the STD version, or I have to start from strach again to configure the server? Is there any catches, anything I should have attention to (We are using heavily about CLR and fulltext indexing)?
Does anyone know how to get SQL Server versions, Service pack versionsand the Server that instance of SQL is running on a network. I haveseen some threads on how to list SQL servers in a network but I need tofind more info about these SQL servers.Any help appreciated..!Thx...
Hello, I installed the SQL Server 2k EnterPrise version and developer version on the same version, and the developer version is an instance "Development". How do I expose both of them to internet? Just open both of them to port 1433? And on the client side, just say IP and IP/Development? Do I need specific set up, will they conflict? Thanks,
I downloaded the 101 Samples installation (i.e. 101SamplesCS.msi) from Microsoft's website, which contains SQL Server database files.
While working with the databases in the "Data Access" samples from the 101 Samples projects, I get the following error:
"Database <mdf_name> cannot be upgraded because its non-release version (600) is not supported by this version of SQL Server. You cannot open a database that is incompatible with this version of sqlservr.exe. You must re-create the database..."
I assume the database files were created with a beta or CTP version of SQL Server 2005. Does anyone know where I can get an updated version of these database files or scripts to update them?
If SQL Server 2000 is loaded onto a 8 processor machine, can I legitimately load Standard Edition, which will only use 4 of the 8 processors, or as some interpretations of the license suggest, must I purchase Enterprise Edition (i.e. you are not permitted to load SQL Server on a machine which has more processors than the Product is capable of using) ?.
I know the "reasonable" answer, but what is the legal position ?
My company is embarking on a data warehousing project. We are going to purchase a Windows 2003 server. It would be a dual processor. The specs are not certain yet so cannot give more details on that.
1. The data in the warehouse would be close to 150 GB. 2. There will be maximum of 10 users needs a SQL Server license. 3. Do not need analysis services.
What edition do I go with -Enterprise OR Standara? I want the least priced edition. I looked up the various links on Books Online but I am still not able to decide.
Say I need only 2 GB of RAM. Then here are my questions.
1. Since we are going with a dual-processor, do I need to purchase processor license for each of the two? Why can't I have one license on one processor only? What are the implications of this?
2. The 10 users that I am talking about will be remotely connecting to this Windows 2003 server and accessing the databae.
3. What exactly is Failover clustering? Do I really need it for my warehousing project?
4. Please help me pick the correct license. Here is the link -
Is there a way to find the SQL Server licensing information after the software is installed? I mean is there a way to say that it was licensed per cpu or per cal?
I have a Windows 2000 Operating System with 4 processor, out of which I'm planning to use only one Processor for the SQL Server and leave the rest of the three processor for the OS. My question is that do I need to buy the license for all the 4 processors or I can do with the only 1 that will be used for running the SQL?
I am a DBA and I have a SQL Server 2005 license for each server. To manage the servers, I want to install SQL Server 2005 on my local desktop. Do I need a license for it as well?
I have a three server network. One SQL Server, One Web Server, and a backup.
The web server is ASP.NET, and uses the database. I do not track the number of users hitting the web server.
What type of sql server license is needed? Processor? Device CAL? User CAL? I have read all the white papers and licensing info and can't find an aswer to this question.
What kind of license do I need to run a single web site on a web server that needs SQL server to operate? it's a public site that runs DotNetNuke but it's the only site on that box.
I am a DBA and I have a SQL Server 2005 license for each server. To manage the servers, I want to install SQL Server 2005 on my local desktop. Do I need a license for it as well?
I am a developer in need of setting up a SQL Server test environment for many users.
Can the Dev Edition be used as a back-end to handle this type of testing? Are my limited to one connection from my development machine?
As you can tell, <sarcastic tone>i am having a real fun time with this one</sarcastic tone>. Licensing terms are an area that i tried but sometimes cann't stay out of.
Hello all, I have a question concerning the ridiculous quagmire of SQL Server licensing… How is SQL Server licensed when used to store session state information? Is MS claiming that this is an end user use of SQL Server functionality? Or, can we be realistic and say that I need a server license plus a device license for each web server?
Personally, I like everything about SQL Server except the licensing. Management at my company has already said that we’ll most likely be moving to either Firebird or Postgres after they found out how much it would cost to move from SQL 2k to SQL 2005. If MS wants us to buy processor licenses for SQL state servers, I guarantee we’ll be doing something else there as well. I wonder if Microsoft has any clue how much business they’re losing. Not just in SQL Server, but in their OS business as well.
In order to use Replication, sql server installation must use per seat licensing. What if I have per server licensing, how can I change the licensing to per seat so I can use replication Ahmed
I am so confused and I am getting no help from the Microsoft, two months and only stammering from their representatives. I need to set up a Sql Server database that will allow internet access. This is not an e-commerce situation. At most there will be 10 known users of this system accessing statistical data. I had priced this system to use Backoffice, but as I now read this is not legal for internet use. It also appears that a processor license is required for internet access (not entirely clear on this). Access and MSDE also don't appear to be legal for internet access. The customer is on a shoe string budget. If I use stand-alone components the budget only covers an one processor SQL Server 2000 license. I don't like the idea of setting up a database system with only one processor. Is there another Sql Server based option I am not aware of? Its looking like a linux/mysql option - Yikes!
Sorry in advance for the potentially boneheaded question: I would like to purchase SQL Svr 2005 Std Edition in a 2 proc licensing config. All my retailer has is 1proc and doesn't have answers for 2proc... Can I buy a 1proc and upgrade thru MSFT? If not, how do I buy a 2proc copy...? Thanks! JohnWoo
How do I tell what SQL licensing option (processor, device CALS or user CALS) was taken when the server was installed? I have taken over a SQL 2005 server and I would like to check how many CALS (if any) it is licensed for.
I have a SQL Server 2005 Standard per processor license (My server has a dual core processor). How many client machines can I install the SQL management studio so they can register the SQL Server and query data if need be?
I couldn't decide where in the forums to ask this question.. So I hope there's someone here who can help or you could suggest where I might go.
I have a client with around 5 standard PCs in the office. They want an application to run the business and are trying to decide if SQL Server or Access is the best way to go. My suggestion has been SQL Server, considering the plans they have for the business and the software. But their main issue is the cost.
They don't currently have a Windows Server... Just a bunch of shared drives on win XP which suits them well. Can anyone suggest the database configuration they should be going for? Minimising cost is their main issue and they don't want to go through the trouble of setting up a full windows server.
Are there licensing and legal issues to install one of the workstations with SQL Server Express with a VB.Net application running on potentially 2 machines?
