I have implemented the Stored Procedure "RowCount" method of controlling
paged recordsets in ASP as shown in this page
http://www.aspfaq.com/show.asp?id=2120.
I have had to make heavy alterations to the code in order for it to work
with my application.
It all worked fine until I tried to sort my data by a field which contained
a NULL value (even in just one record). Before I added additional criteria
for the Unique_ID field the stored procedure returned zero records when
sorting by such a field. I then added the Unique_ID criteria to the ORDER BY
and WHERE clauses (as seen below) and it excludes records.
In short obviously what I want this to do is order by fields that contain
NULL values (e.g. fld4 in sample data below). It currently pages and orders
perfectly in fields which have data in every row.
If anyone reads this and helps me, thanks *very* much in advance.
(P.S. sorry about the horrible state of my code but I've been messing with
it trying to get this fixed for ages)
(P.P.S the reason for passing in the long SQL string as a parameter in the
SP is because the string is generated using complicated loops and I found
this much easier in ASP than doing it in SQL)
******************************************
Here is an example of a call to the procedure from ASP:
EXEC st_paging_rowcount 7, 1, 50, 'SET ROWCOUNT 50 SELECT utbl7.*,
utbl6_1.fld1 AS fld3_Name FROM utbl7 LEFT OUTER JOIN utbl6 utbl6_1 ON
utbl7.fld3 = utbl6_1.Unique_ID WHERE utbl7.fld5 >= @fld1val OR
utbl7.Unique_ID >= @uniqueid ORDER BY utbl7.fld5',5
******************************************
Here is the SQL SP:
CREATE PROCEDURE st_paging_rowcount
@tableid INT,
@pagenum INT = 1,
@perpage INT = 50,
@finalselect NVARCHAR(1500),
@sortfield INT
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
I see the following message in SQL Server logs. What does this indicates. What should I do to avoid this.
2008-05-20 01:25:02.12 spid2s A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 0 seconds. Working set (KB): 33920, committed (KB): 15142988, memory utilization: 0%.
The server configuration is
SQL 2005 Dev edition SP2 64bit Win 2003 R2 SP2 Standard X64 editioin RAM size is 16GB
In my SQL Server Errorlog, I see the below error. The system has 8 GB of RAM with enough free RAM, something I can do to prevent this alert? (Note: I have no MIN/MAX memory set on this Instance)
A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 328 seconds. Working set (KB): 76896, committed (KB): 167628, memory utilization: 45%.
On a SQL Server 2005 x64 Standard Edition cluster I get the error listed below and then the SQL server service restarts. The SQL server is unavailable for 5-10 minutes during that time. Any ideas?
Error: A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 647 seconds. Working set (KB): 11907776, committed (KB): 28731732, memory utilization: 41%%.
Can anybody shed some light on my issue? I'm reviewing my client's event log and finding the repetitive warning "A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation." This has been an ongoing issue that I've searched high and low to try and resolve.
The system is Windows Server 2003 Standard x64 Edition - SQL Server 2005 SP2 - 2.33 GHz - 4 GB Ram
I have been searching this topic on and for quite some time and can't seem to find a decent answer. Is it feasible to do your paging strictly from a SQL query? Pass the query the pagesize, what page to return and what to sort by?
I frequently see the following message on SQL Server log
2008-06-09 07:46:18.17 spid3s A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 0 seconds. Working set (KB): 1079156, committed (KB): 17156388, memory utilization: 6%.
What does it indicates and what appropriate action has to be taken to fix it.
The database runs on
SQL 2005 Dev 64-bit SP2 9.00.3042.00 Win 2003 standard x64 SP2 16GB RAM
Is there a way, other than simply changing the format of the SRS report, to create an old fashond Paged style report - similar to the ones you can get from Crystal Reports?
What is the recommended mechanism for selecting paged results from SQL.
Presently I pass various params including the request Max Items Per Page and the requested page.
The I execute the query as a count with the search params.
Then comes the paging logic, which validates the page number against the request page and number of hits etc.
Then a temp table and record variables are created for the results.
Then I run the query again with a cursor and select the appropriate Items into the temp table based on the paging values (First Item and Last Item).
Then I return the temp table & some additional return params with the Total Hits etc.
The Stored procedure is accessed via an ADO.Net client and the system.data.IDBReader populates a .Net strongly typed collection and is for read only display.
I have a paging query that uses OpenQuery to access the MSIDXS indexing service and return records where text is matched. The query looks like this:
select top 25 * from OpenQuery(FileSystem, 'SELECT DocTitle, FileName, Rank, Size, Create from Scope() where contains(''report'') ORDER BY Rank DESC') as Q, LookupDocuments_dbv AS v where Q.FileName=v.Loc_cst and catname_cst='Main' and (v.docid_cin not in (select top 600 v.docid_cin from OpenQuery(FileSystem, 'SELECT DocTitle, FileName, Rank, Size, Create from Scope() where contains(''report'') ORDER BY Rank DESC') as Q, LookupDocuments_dbv AS v where Q.FileName=v.Loc_cst order by v.docid_cin)) order by v.docid_cin
Not the exact query, but it is just as slow as the query in my program. This query will retrieve the top 25 records starting at record 601 where 'report' is found in a document and where the category = 'Main'
What is really weird about this is that in management studio this query will sometimes return in like 3 seconds, while the exact same query will take 30 seconds using ASP.Net / System.Data.SqlClient (and I mean it actually sits on sqlCommand.ExecuteReader() for a long period of time). Also, does management studio cache the table randomly, because sometimes it'll take forever and other times it'll be fast.
I do not have response issues with this paging query in non-MSIDXS queries.. I can for example return the 5,000th - 5,025th of 50,000 records in less than a second while the OpenQuery manages to get progressively slower very quickly (like 3 extra seconds per page of 25 records, so it takes like 20 seconds to return 150-175 of 600).
I am trying to move my application (asp.net) from a non-paged select to a paged query.
I am having a problem. Below is my Stored Procedure. The first Query in the procedure works...the rest (which are commented out ALL work interactively, but fail when the program tries to access....The ONLY THING I change is the stored procedure I switch the comment lines to the non-paged procedure and it works, I try to use the any of the paged procedures and it fails with the same error (included below)
I can't see where any of the queries are returning different results. I have also included the program abort that happens, it is the same for all of the paged queries.
ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.puse_equipment_GetAllTypedEquipment ( @EquipmentTypeId int, @StartRowIndex int, @MaximumRows int ) AS
-- ************************************************************************************************ -- Non-Paged OUTPUT -- THIS WORKS!!!!! SET NOCOUNT ON SELECT Equipment.*, EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category FROM Equipment INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON EquipmentCategory.CategoryId = Equipment.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId = Equipment.EquipmentTypeId where Equipment.EquipmentTypeId = @EquipmentTypeId AND Equipment.IsDeleted = 0
/* -- ************************************************************************************************ -- Using a Temp Table --THIS WORKS INTERACTIVELY, But NOT When Called by the program SET NOCOUNT ON create table #PagedEquipment ( IndexId int IDENTITY(1,1) Not NULL, EquipId int )
-- Insert the rows from Equipment into the PagedEquipment table Insert INTO #PagedEquipment (EquipId) select EquipmentId From Equipment WHERE IsDeleted = 0
SELECT #PagedEquipment.IndexId, *,EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category FROM Equipment INNER JOIN #PagedEquipment with (nolock) on Equipment.EquipmentId = #PagedEquipment.EquipId INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON EquipmentCategory.CategoryId = Equipment.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId = Equipment.EquipmentTypeId Where #PagedEquipment.IndexId Between (@StartRowIndex) AND (@StartRowIndex + @MaximumRows +1) */
/* -- ********************************************************************************************** --Using the With to create a temp table (in memory)..works interactively but fails when --called by the application.. --THIS WORKS INTERACTIVELY, But NOT When Called by the program Set NOCOUNT ON; With PagedEquipment AS ( SELECT EquipmentId, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order by Equipment.EquipmentId) AS RowNumber FROM Equipment WHERE EquipmentTypeId = @EquipmentTypeId AND IsDeleted = 0 )
SELECT RowNumber, Equipment.*, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category, EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType FROM PagedEquipment INNER JOIN Equipment ON Equipment.EquipmentId = PagedEquipment.EquipmentId INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON Equipment.CategoryId = EquipmentCategory.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON Equipment.EquipmentTypeId = EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId WHERE PagedEquipment.RowNumber Between (@StartRowIndex+1) AND (@StartRowIndex+1+@MaximumRows) return -- ******************************************************************************************* */
/* -- ******************************************************************************************** --nested selects --THIS WORKS INTERACTIVELY, BUT NOT WHEN CALLED FROM THE PROGRAM SET NOCOUNT ON Select * From ( Select Row_Number() OVER (Order By Equipment.EquipmentId) as RowNumber, Equipment.*, EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category FROM Equipment INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON EquipmentCategory.CategoryId = Equipment.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId = Equipment.EquipmentTypeId where Equipment.EquipmentTypeId = @EquipmentTypeId AND Equipment.IsDeleted = 0 ) equip Where equip.RowNumber between (@StartRowIndex+1) AND (@StartRowIndex + 1 + @MaximumRows ) -- ************************************************************************************************ */
Server Error in '/pUse' Application. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int.
Source Error:
Line 148: { Line 149: List<EquipmentDetails> equipment = new List<EquipmentDetails>(); Line 150: while (reader.Read()) Line 151: equipment.Add(GetEquipmentFromReader(reader)); Line 152: return equipment;
Source File: c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeDALEquipmentEquipmentProvider.cs Line: 150
Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int.] System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +925466 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +800118 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +186 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +1932 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.HasMoreRows() +150 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.ReadInternal(Boolean setTimeout) +212 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.Read() +9 PredominantUse.DAL.Equipment.EquipmentProvider.GetEquipmentCollectionFromReader(IDataReader reader) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeDALEquipmentEquipmentProvider.cs:150 PredominantUse.DAL.Equipment.SqlClient.SqlEquipmentProvider.GetTypedEquipmentList(Int32 EquipmentTypeId, Int32 StartRowIndex, Int32 MaximumRows) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeDALEquipmentSqlClientSqlEquipmentProvider.cs:103 PredominantUse.BLL.Equipment.GetTypedEquipment(Int32 EquipmentTypeId, Int32 StartRowIndex, Int32 MaximumRows) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeBLLEquipmentEquipment.cs:259 PredominantUse.BLL.Equipment.GetTypedEquipment(Int32 EquipmentTypeId) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeBLLEquipmentEquipment.cs:238
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.1433; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.1433
We are running SQL 2005 SP2 x64 on Windows 2003 SP2 X64.
Server specs: Quad Core, each core runs at 2.33Ghz. 4GB memory OS and SQL on RAID 1 set Transaction log on RAID 1 set Databases on RAID 5 set
-The SQL service account is a domain account with the "lock pages in memory" rights. -The min memory use for sql server is 3000MBand the maximum is 2147483647MB.
For whatever reason, the sqlsrvr.exe process uses much less physical memory than the Virtual Memory (VM). When I look at the Task manager, I see 230MB for Mem Usage column and 300MB for VM size column under full workload. Why is the SQL server process being paged out? I have 3GB for it to use. Should I be concerned about the my SQL server?
I didn't configure the AWE as MS doesn't recomment using it on x64 bit systems. When I do "dbcc memorystatus", I get the following:
VM Reserved 4269536 VM Committed 196680 AWE Allocated 0 Reserved Memory 1024 Reserved Memory In Use 0
I thought granting "lock pages in memory" rights to the sql service account automatically enables AWE in x64 bit version of SQL 2005 standard server.
Hi, I am trying to implement filtering on a custome paged stored Procedure, here is my curent Stored Procedure which doesn't error on complie or run but returns no records. Anyone got any ideas on how to make this work???<Stored Procedure>set ANSI_NULLS ONset QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONgo-- =============================================-- Author: Peter Annandale-- Create date: 22/10/2006-- Description: Get Filtered Names-- =============================================ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[proc_NAMEFilterPaged] -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here @startRowIndex int, @maximumRows int, @columnName varchar(20), @filterValue varchar(20)ASBEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. SET NOCOUNT ON;SELECT CODE, LAST_NAME, Name, TYPE, NUMBER FROM (SELECT n.CODE, n.LAST_NAME, n.FIRST_NAME + ' ' + n.MIDDLE_NAME AS Name, nt.TYPE, f.NUMBER, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY n.LAST_NAME) as RowNum FROM dbo.NAME n LEFT OUTER JOIN NAMETYPE nt ON n.NAME_TYPE = nt.NAME_TYPE LEFT OUTER JOIN FUNERAL f ON n.CODE = f.DECEASED WHERE @columnName LIKE @filterValue ) as NameInfo WHERE RowNum BETWEEN @startRowIndex AND (@startRowIndex + @maximumRows) -1END </Stored Procedure> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.. Regards..Peter.
I am getting an error (number -2147217887, error message "ODBC--call failed.") when I try to execute an rst.Update. I have an MS Access 2013 application using an ODBC connection to SQL Server 2008 r2. I am using a query to update a table. It is a simple Select query with no joins. I have checked to make sure the table can be updated.
I was not sure if there were any special permissions that I need to set to allow a linked table to be updated in MS Access this way?
I'm new on this forum, but, I'm a experienced programmer. I wanna solve this problem (if you can helpme....), recently, I'm trying to migrate an old SQL 7 to the new SQL 2005 server enterprise edition, I have no problem to import the data, users, stored procedures, etc. and all work fine, I can connect troght ODBC from the others computers, including some older pentium 1 mmx 200 mhz. with WIN98 (yes!).
My problem is an legacy VB6 application that work (well fine) with SQL7 server, but, when i change the odbc of the desktops systems to the new 2005 SQL server and run this legacy application hi recibe this error: (english translation from spanish language)
[ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server] The table to be modified is not included on this cursor or these can't be modified throught this cursor.
I have look on the source code of the legacy application, and someone of the segment's that causes error is:
Public Function ConsultaCamara(sRutOP As String, _ sRut1 As String, _ strConsulta As String, _ Tipo As String, _ chk As CheckBox, _ Timer1 As Timer, _ LbAviso As Label) As Long '---------------------------- Dim rsCACH, rsCACH_upd0, rsCACH_upd1, rsCACH_upd2 As ADODB.Recordset Dim CmCACH As ADODB.Command Dim lPendiente As Boolean Dim lActivo As Boolean Dim strSQL1, strSQL_upd0, strSQL_upd1, strSQL_upd2 As String Dim StrWHE As String Dim DameTiempo As Integer Dim snombre As String Dim sMsgEstado As String Dim sAviso_Inicial As String Dim cNum As String Dim cDig As String ... ... ... 'Defino el string de consulta strSQL1 = " SELECT RUTOPERADOR, " & _ " IDCAMARA, " & _ " RUTCONSULTADO, " & _ " ESTADO, " & _ " CANCON, " & _ " CADENACONSULTA, " & _ " FINGRESO, " & _ " FULCONSINT, " & _ " ULTRUTOP " & _ " FROM BOLETIN " & _ " WHERE RUTCONSULTADO = '" & sRut1 & "'" & _ " AND (ESTADO = 'PE' OR ESTADO = 'AC' )"
Set rsCACH = CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset") rsCACH.ActiveConnection = cn rsCACH.CursorType = adOpenKeyset rsCACH.LockType = adLockOptimistic rsCACH.Open strSQL1 If rsCACH.EOF Then 'No hay registro antiguo o en consulta, creo uno para consultar sMsgEstado = "NO Existen datos ES REGISTRO NUEVO" & vbCr rsCACH.AddNew ConsultaCamara = GeneraID() rsCACH.Fields("IDCAMARA") = ConsultaCamara rsCACH.Fields("RUTOPERADOR") = sRutOP rsCACH.Fields("RUTCONSULTADO") = sRut1 rsCACH.Fields("ESTADO") = "PE" rsCACH.Fields("CANCON") = 1 rsCACH.Fields("CADENACONSULTA") = strConsulta rsCACH.Fields("FINGRESO") = GetDateTime() 'Format(Date, "Short Date") rsCACH.Fields("FULCONSINT") = GetDateTime() 'Format(Date, "Short Date") rsCACH.Fields("ULTRUTOP") = sRutOP rsCACH.Update <----- here's launches the error ... ... ...
create table a (id int, name varchar(10)); create table b(id int, sal int); insert into a values(1,'John'),(1,'ken'),(2,'paul'); insert into b values(1,400),(1,500);
select * from a cross apply( select max(sal) as sal from b where b.id = a.id)b;
Below is the result for the same:
idname sal 1John500 1ken500 2paulNULL
Now I'm not sure why the record with ID 2 is coming using CROSS APPLY, shouldn't it be avoided in case of CROSS APPLY and only displayed when using OUTER APPLY.
One thing that I noticed was that if you remove the Aggregate function MAX then the record with ID 2 is not shown in the output. I'm running this query on SQL Server 2012.
Hi, I have a web form that lets users search for people in my database they wish to contact. The database returns a paged set of results using a CTE, Top X, and Row_number(). I would like to give my users to option of removing individual people from this list but cannot find a way to do this. I have tried creating a session variable with a comma delimited list of ID's that I pass to my sproc and use in a NOT IN() statement. But I keep getting a "Input string was not in a correct format." Error Message. Is there any way to do this? I am still new to stored procedures so any advice would be helpful. Thanks
"pRecordSet" is an ADO recordset. The database column "MyColumn" is of type "decimal(19,10)".
The most important question for me is, if the regional settings of the database server or the regional settings of the client PC are considered during the conversion from the string to the decimal value. For example in standard French regional settings the "." would not be recognized as decimal separator.
I am also wondering if the language of the database instance, in which this data is saved, is considered during this conversion or any other settings of this database instance.
So my general question is: Does anybody know exactly what rules apply during the above mentioned conversion?
Hi, I am trying to cycle through a table and trigger an event based on some critera. I am not sure how to do it. I am a classic VBA guy, so I might be way off: Dim myConnection As SqlConnection Dim myCommand As SqlCommand myConnection = New SqlConnection("MY SQL DATA SOURCE") myConnection.Open()
myCommand = New SqlCommand("SELECT * FROM history", myConnection) Dim dr = myCommand.ExecuteReader() Dim i As Integer = 1
While dr.read() i = i + 1 ' HOW DO I CYCLE THROUGH THE ROWS AND ASK IF A FIELD EQUALS A VALUE ' field name = "Tail"
hi I have 3 tables:Article,Source and File. Each article can have multiple filenames. The fields of table Article are:ArticleID,SourceID,ArticleDate,ArticleCategory The fields of table Source are:SourceID,SourceName the fields of Table File:ID,ArticleID,Filename Select*from Article inner join Source on Article.SourceID=source.SourceID order by ArticleDate I obtain a number of recordsets from the above query. Then for each recordset(Rs1),Let's say for the first recordset Rs1.MoveFirst I want to apply this query: Rs2.Open"Select SourceName,ArticleDate,File.Filename from [RS1] inner Join File on Article.ArticleID=File.ArticleID I want from the above query to have the Filenames corresponding to each Article because in my VB form I have 2 command buttons:one gives me the article's definition(Date,Source) and the other gives me the Filename of the current recordset(Article) The above SQL syntax is it correct?
SELECT TOP 2 MenuComments, MenuDate, MenuID, MenuIsActive, MenuName FROM Menu ORDER BY MenuDate DESC
This orders the data correctly, but the problem is, I need ONLY the SECOND row, not the top row. Also, because I am sorting for menus entered into the system, I cannot use a variable based on real dates (in other words, I can't use the server clock to help filter the results).
Any and all help would be GREATLY appreciated -- I've been banging my head against this one all day!
I am using classic ASP. Records are grouped together by a GroupUnique number. Some groups are small with about 10 records, othere are larger at about 160.
For each record, I have about 50 columns of data that I need to display on a webpage. Because the 50 columns don't easily fit on the one page, I create two tables, each displaying 26 columns, the first columnn being an ID column. Due to the size of groups, sometimes the tables are very large - and when they get too big it overloads the server.
I think the main problem is the two tables. I use two recordsets (one of them is shown below - although instead of a SELECT * I do in fact name the columns needed for each table). I have to use two because the Recordsets don't like me using the ID column again - once it is used it is gone.
Is there a better way to store all of this information so that I can just use the one recordset? Possibly in an array? Is there a more efficient way of getting the data?
<% Dim Recordset4__MMColParam1 Recordset4__MMColParam1 = "1" If (Scramble.Fields.Item("GU").Value <> "") Then Recordset4__MMColParam1 = Scramble.Fields.Item("GU").Value End If %>
I am having some problems. I'm pretty new to sql and really dont know how to achieve more than the basic selects etc.,
My problem is that I have a recordset on one page http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals.asp that returns the results of all the images in one category. In this case it's animals and wildlife.
The user can click on any image and go to a page that shows a larger detail version of the image. http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals-photo-detail.asp
What I do is post the ProductID number to this page so that the selected thumb is shown. So for exmaple for the image of the wild cat it is http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals-photo-detail.asp?ProductID=6
My problem is that on the animals-photo-detail.asp the user has to be able to "scroll" through all the images from the category.
I.e should be able to hit the previous image button and see the stallion image, or the next button to see the butterfly etc., and thus scroll through all the images on this age if he/ she wishes to.
I understand the principles of having a results page and then being able to click on one of the results and getting a detail page. Such as I have it here. With the http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals.asp as a results page listing all the results of the category, and then when the user clicks on one of the results, goes to a detail page, for example, http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals-photo-detail.asp?ProductID=6.
My problem is that what I need is the recordset from the listing page to function on the detail page so that the user can scroll through the results in the same order that they were on the results page.
I have searched now for a couple of days online and every tutorial I find shows the same structure. Results Page > Detail Page.
The sql i am using on the detail page is simply,
<% Dim photos_rs__MMColParam photos_rs__MMColParam = "1" If (Request.QueryString("ProductID") <> "") Then photos_rs__MMColParam = Request.QueryString("ProductID") End If %>
So I understand why it will only display the one result since thats the detail page.
Is it possible to be able to scroll through the results using the previous and next buttons as I have setup in the display on the http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals-photo-detail.asp page. For example, http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals-photo-detail.asp=ProductID=6.
Since the resutls are gathered from across the database its not possible to have a href tage that does a <<< http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals-photo-detail.asp=ProductID=(6 -1) or a >>> http://www.photoghetto.com/photo-images/animals-photo-detail.asp=ProductID=(6+1).
I guess it has to be something with a recordset index but does anyone know how to do it? And does anyone have the ability to help me do it?
My boss is kicking my butt now to get this thing online at some point today, and I'm turning to you guys for help if possible.
I'm sorry if this is a stupid question. I've really ran out of ideas.
This asp code displayes records in a combo box:<%openDB()call updateDB("usp_retrieveOptions",rs)if not rs.eof then%><tr><td width="66">Options</td><td width="137"><select name="select1" class="TextField1"><%i = 0do while not rs.eofif rs(0) <> Arr(i) thenresponse.write "<option value=" & rs(0) & ">" & rs(1)i = i + 1end ifrs.movenextloop%></select></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2" width="206"><center><table width="71" border="0" cellspacing="3" cellpadding="0"height="33"><tr><td width="9" height="30"><input type="submit" name="Assign" value="Assign"></td></tr></table></center></td></tr><%end ifcloseRS()closeDB()%>The call updateDB("usp_retrieveOptions",rs) invokessub updateDB(SQL,rs)set rs = objConn.Execute(SQL)end suband my usp_retrieveOptions stored procedure:create procedure usp_retrieveOptionsAS SET NOCOUNT ONSELECT OptionID, Description FROM OptionsReturnGOnow in my asp code when I try response.write rs.RecordCount I am getting-1 all the time. How do I solve the problem. Your help is kindlyappreciated.Eugene Anthony*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
Im doing a select that should retrieve a name from one table and display thenumber of correct bets done in the betDB (using the gameDB that has info onhow a game ended)I want the "MyVAR" value to be used in the inner select statement withouttoo much hassle. As you can see im trying to get the "MyVAR" to insert inthe bottom line of the code.Whats the quick fix to this one..?Thanks in advance :-)---------- code begin ----------select memberDB.memberID as MyVAR, (select count(GamesDB.GameID)from GamesDBinner join GameBetDBon GameBetDB.betHome = GamesDB.homeGoal and GameBetDB.betAway =GamesDB.awaygoalinner join memberDBon memberDB.memberID = GameBetDB.memberIDwhere GamesDB.gameID=GameBetDB.gameIDand GameBetDB.memberID= MyVAR ) as wins from memberDB---------- code end ----------
I am connecting to the database as following: set con = server.createobject("adodb.connection") con.open "connectionstring" set rs = con.execute("select * from tablename")
I am able to display the records but if I want to give adopenstatic to the above connection, how can I do so?
I have some problems to edit a recordset in an ActiveX DTS using Vbscript. Here is an example of the script :
dim varsql, varset, varconn set varconn = CreateObject("ADODB.Connection") set varset = CreateObject("ADODB.Recordset") varconn.Open = "Provider=SQLOLEDB.1;Data Source=(local);Initial Catalog=Enregistrement3;user id = 'sa';password=''"
if varset.recordcount >0 then do while varset.eof varset.edit ......................... varset.update varset.movenext loop end if varset.close varconn.close
Does someone see what is wrong ? I allways get -1 for the varset.recordcount ! (I checked there are some records into the table). I don't think it is a problem of user's right as it works with the same user configuration using a SQL action requery. If I modify the open statement like this : varset.Open varsql, varconn, 1 varset.recordcount contains the good number of records but the recordset is read noly and can't be modified...