SQL Server Slower After 2005 Upgrade
Jul 20, 2007
We have an extensive stress test for our OLTP application.that runs slower after upgrading to SQL Server 2005.
We have done the following:
- applied SP1 and SP2
- updated statistics (sp_updatestats)
- recompiled all stored procedures
Some behavior we notice in Perfmon over the course of the 1-hour test is:
- Average CPU Utilization is up from 22% to 32% and we're trying to figure out why
- Compilations per second are up from 200 to 250
- Recompilations per second are down from 5 to 1 (which is good).
- Memory utilization is identical.
- We see exagerated spikes in response times. The general performance
seems pretty good - but there are periodic spikes that hurt our averages.
- I examined perfmon for waits and nothing jumped out.
- A small handful of application workflows are much slower, while most are roughly identical.
I realize there could be a zillion different causes. But if anyone has experience upgrading a large OLTP solution which uses a mixture of dynamic SQL and stored procedures to SS2005 - and tuning the upgraded database - please offer any suggestions.
Our current plan includes (a) running the Best Practices analyzer which already uncovered a trace flag we may want to use since we're running on an 8-way, (b) rebuilding indexes, and (c) examine a SQL Trace this time around too since it appears the slowness is isolated to certain application workflows.
Please offer any suggestions that have worked for your team.
Thanks so much!
Mike
PS I will post all the things we end up doing in the end once we get performance equal or better - hopefully the latter!!!
View 9 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 6, 2008
Hi all,
My ASP application is running fast in SQL Server 2000. But when we shifted it to SQL Server 2005, it becomes very slow.
I have created the indexes also. There is lot of data in the tables.
Is there any option to build the indexes for previous data.
Please help....
-Shah.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I am begginner at best so I hope someone that is better can help.I have a stored procedure that updates a view that I wrote using 2cursors.(Kind of a Inner Loop) I wrote it this way Because I couldn'tdo it using reqular transact SQL.The problem is that this procedure is taking longer and longer to run.Up to 5 hours now! It is anaylizing about 30,000 records. I thinkpartly because we add new records every month.The procedure works like this.The first Cursor stores a unique account and duedate combination fromthe view.It then finds all the accts in the view that have that account duedatecombo and loads them into Cursor 2 this groups them together for datamanipulation. The accounts have to be grouped this way because aaccount can have different due dates and multiple records within eachaccount due date combo and they need to be looked at this way aslittle singular groups.Here is my procedure I hope someone can shead some light on this. Myboss is giving me heck about it. (I think he thinks Girls cant code!)I got this far I hope someone can help me optimize it further.CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.sp_PromiseStatusASBEGINSET NOCOUNT ON/* Global variables */DECLARE @tot_pay moneyDECLARE @rec_upd VARCHAR(1)DECLARE @todays_date varchar(12)DECLARE @mActivityDate2_temp datetimeDECLARE @tot_paydate datetime/* variables for cursor ACT_CUR1*/DECLARE @mAcct_Num1 BIGINTDECLARE @mDueDate1 datetime/* variables for ACT_CUR2 */DECLARE @mAcct_Num2 BIGINTDECLARE @mActivity_Date2 datetimeDECLARE @mPromise_Amt_1 moneyDECLARE @mPromise_Status varchar(3)DECLARE @mCurrent_Due_Amt moneyDECLARE @mDPD intDECLARE @mPromise_Date datetimeSELECT @todays_date =''+CAST(DATEPART(mm,getdate()) AS varchar(2))+'/'+CAST(DATEPART(dd,getdate()) AS varchar(2))+'/'+CAST(DATEPART(yyyy,getdate()) AS varchar(4))+''DECLARE ACT_CUR1 CURSOR FORSELECT DISTINCTA.ACCT_NUM,A.DUE_DATEFROM VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDS AOPEN ACT_CUR1FETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR1 INTO @mAcct_Num1 , @mDueDate1WHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)BEGINSELECT @rec_upd = 'N 'DECLARE ACT_CUR2 CURSOR FORSELECTB.ACCT_NUM,B.ACTIVITY_DATE,B.PROMISE_AMT_1,B.PROMISE_STATUS,B.CURRENT_DUE_AMT,B.DAYS_DELINQUENT_NUM,B.PROMISE_DATE_1FROM VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDS B (UPDLOCK)WHERE B.ACCT_NUM = @mAcct_Num1ANDB.DUE_DATE = @mDueDate1ORDER BY B.ACCT_NUM,B.DUE_DATE,B.ACTIVITY_DATE,CASEB.Time_ObtainedWHEN 0 THEN 0ELSE 1END Desc, B.Time_ObtainedOPEN ACT_CUR2FETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR2INTO @mAcct_Num2 ,@mActivity_Date2,@mPromise_Amt_1,@mPromise_Status ,@mCurrent_Due_Amt,@mDPD,@mPromise_DateWHILE (@@FETCH_STATUS = 0)BEGIN----CHECK------------------------------------------------------------------------DECLARE @PrintVariable2 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable2 = CAST(@MACCT_NUM2 AS VARCHAR)+''+CAST(@MACTIVITY_DATE2 AS VARCHAR)+' '+CAST(@MPROMISE_AMT_1 ASVARCHAR)+' '+CAST(@MPROMISE_STATUS AS VARCHAR)+''+CAST(@mCurrent_Due_Amt AS VARCHAR)+' '+CAST(@mDPD AS VARCHAR)+''+CAST(@mPromise_Date AS VARCHAR)--PRINT @PrintVariable2----ENDCHECK------------------------------------------------------------IF @mDPD >= 30BEGINSELECT @tot_pay = SUM(CONVERT(FLOAT, C.PAY_AMT))FROM vwAplicablePayments CWHERE C.ACCT_NUM = @mAcct_Num2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE >= @mActivity_Date2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE < @mActivity_Date2 + 15----CHECK------------------------------------------------------------------------DECLARE @PrintVariable3 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable3 ='Greater=30 DOLLARS COLLECTED'--PRINT @PrintVariable3----ENDCHECK------------------------------------------------------------ENDELSE IF @mDPD < 30BEGINSELECT @tot_pay = SUM(CONVERT(FLOAT, C.PAY_AMT))FROM vwAplicablePayments CWHERE C.ACCT_NUM = @mAcct_Num2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE >= @mActivity_Date2ANDC.ACTIVITY_DATE BETWEEN @mActivity_Date2 AND@mPromise_Date + 5----CHECK----------------------------------------------------------------------DECLARE @PrintVariable4 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable4 ='Less 30 DOLLARS COLLECTED'--PRINT @PrintVariable4----END CHECK------------------------------------------------------------END----------------------------------------MY REVISEDLOGIC-------------------------------------------------------IF @rec_upd = 'N'BEGINIF @mDPD >= 30BEGINSELECT @mActivityDate2_temp = @mActivity_Date2 + 15--DECLARE @PrintVariable5 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable5 =' GREATER= 30 USING ACTVITY_DATE+15'--PRINT @PrintVariable5ENDELSE IF @mDPD < 30BEGINSELECT @mActivityDate2_temp = @mPromise_Date + 5--DECLARE @PrintVariable6 VARCHAR (8000)--SELECT @PrintVariable6 =' LESS 30 USING PROMISE_DATE+5'--PRINT @PrintVariable6ENDIF @tot_pay >= 0.9 * @mCurrent_Due_Amt--used to be promise amtBEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET PROMISE_STATUS = 'PK',TOTAL_DOLLARS_COLL = @tot_payWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto PK.IF @mPromise_Status IN ('PTP','OP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @todays_dateWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDSELECT @rec_upd = 'Y 'ENDIF ((@tot_pay < 0.9 * @mCurrent_Due_Amt) OR @tot_pay IS NULL)AND( @mActivityDate2_temp > @todays_date )--need to put 1dayof month here for snapshot9/01/2004BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSETPROMISE_STATUS = 'OP'WHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto OP which is the original Activity Date.--The record will hold this date until it goes into PK,PB,orIP.IF @mPromise_Status IN ('PTP','OP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @mActivity_Date2WHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDENDELSE IF ((@tot_pay < 0.9 * @mCurrent_Due_Amt) OR @tot_pay ISNULL)AND( @mActivityDate2_temp <= @todays_date )--need to put 1dayof month here for snapshot 9/01/2004BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSETPROMISE_STATUS = 'PB',TOTAL_DOLLARS_COLL = case when @tot_pay is nullthen 0 else @tot_pay endWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto PB.IF @mPromise_Status IN ('PTP','OP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @todays_dateWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDENDENDELSE IF @rec_upd = 'Y'BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSETPROMISE_STATUS = 'IP',TOTAL_DOLLARS_COLL = 0WHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2--This statement updates the time that the status was placedinto IP.IF @mPromise_Status NOT IN ('IP')BEGINUPDATE VWAPPLICABLEPROMISEACTIVITYRECORDSSET Status_Date = @todays_dateWHERE CURRENT OF ACT_CUR2ENDENDFETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR2 INTO @mAcct_Num2,@mActivity_Date2,@mPromise_Amt_1,@mPromise_Status ,@mCurrent_Due_Amt,@mDPD,@mPromise_DateENDCLOSE ACT_CUR2DEALLOCATE ACT_CUR2FETCH NEXT FROM ACT_CUR1 INTO @mAcct_Num1 , @mDueDate1ENDCLOSE ACT_CUR1DEALLOCATE ACT_CUR1SET NOCOUNT OFFENDGO
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2008
hi, friends, please look at this:
I have a SSIS package, and inside it I do something like below:
1. I have a SQL component, to give back a object to store the records.
2. I have a VB script component, I direct the object I got in 1 step into the script as a dataset.
My problem is:
I run the package in the SQL SERVER 2005 Store Procedue like this:
do
dtexec.exe package.dtsx
loop untill i>t
I control the it runs 30 times. But I found that the speed is slower and slower.
the first time, it takes about 600 s, but the last time, it takes the 1800 s.
Why?
The package don't drop the object it create during the loop in the Store Procedue ?
Thanks!
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2007
Hi there,
I am an application programmer who uses SQL Server; I'm not an expert and just know the basics. Our application has approximately 300 SQL tables and each table has just one primary index. We don't have stored procedures and only have 3 Views that a couple of reports use. Our database is approximately 26GB in size. We are planning on migrating from SQL 2000/Windows Server 2000 to SQL 2005/Windows Server 2003. Before doing this I decided to do some bench mark testing. I chose a simple SELECT statement on one of our larger tables. On SQL 2000 it ran in 22 seconds whereas on SQL 2005 it ran in 34 seconds.
These are the steps I have done to try and improve performance, all to no avail.
I tried both a passive and active upgrade and the results were the same. The passive way was to remove 2000, install 2005, create a new database and restore from a 2000 backup into the new 2005 database. The active way was to leave 2000 on the server with the database attached and upgrading to 2005.
I did not change any defaults on the database except I have set the compatibility level to SQL 2005.
The collation is set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS.
I have run an Optimize Index Task.
I have run a Rebuild Index Task.
I have run an Update Statistics Task.
I have defragged the drive that the database resides on.
Can anyone explain why SQL 2003 is dramatically slower than 2000? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
View 20 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2007
Hi there,
I am an application programmer who uses SQL Server; I'm not an expert and just know the basics. Our application has approximately 300 SQL tables and each table has just one primary index. We don't have stored procedures and only have 3 Views that a couple of reports use. Our database is approximately 26GB in size. We are planning on migrating from SQL 2000/Windows Server 2000 to SQL 2005/Windows Server 2003. Before doing this I decided to do some bench mark testing. I chose a simple SELECT statement on one of our larger tables. On SQL 2000 it ran in 22 seconds whereas on SQL 2005 it ran in 34 seconds.
These are the steps I have done to try and improve performance, all to no avail.
I tried both a passive and active upgrade and the results were the same. The passive way was to remove 2000, install 2005, create a new database and restore from a 2000 backup into the new 2005 database. The active way was to leave 2000 on the server with the database attached and upgrading to 2005.
I did not change any defaults on the database except I have set the compatibility level to SQL 2005.
The collation is set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS.
I have run an Optimize Index Task.
I have run a Rebuild Index Task.
I have run an Update Statistics Task.
I have defragged the drive that the database resides on.
Can anyone explain why SQL 2003 is dramatically slower than 2000?
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 29, 2007
Hi there,
I am an application programmer who uses SQL Server; I'm not an expert and just know the basics. Our application has approximately 300 SQL tables and each table has just one primary index. We don't have stored procedures and only have 3 Views that a couple of reports use. Our database is approximately 26GB in size. We are planning on migrating from SQL 2000/Windows Server 2000 to SQL 2005/Windows Server 2003. Before doing this I decided to do some bench mark testing. I chose a simple SELECT statement on one of our larger tables. On SQL 2000 it ran in 22 seconds whereas on SQL 2005 it ran in 34 seconds.
These are the steps I have done to try and improve performance, all to no avail.
I tried both a passive and active upgrade and the results were the same. The passive way was to remove 2000, install 2005, create a new database and restore from a 2000 backup into the new 2005 database. The active way was to leave 2000 on the server with the database attached and upgrading to 2005.
I did not change any defaults on the database except I have set the compatibility level to SQL 2005.
The collation is set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AS.
I have run an Optimize Index Task.
I have run a Rebuild Index Task.
I have run an Update Statistics Task.
I have defragged the drive that the database resides on.
Can anyone explain why SQL 2003 is dramatically slower than 2000? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2007
I have a SQL Server 2005 evaluation that has already been installed and setup on a server. I believe it originally had a 180 day eval. There have been numerous databases and users added as well as maintenance plan created...
The eval was put on the machine as an interim solution while waiting for paper work and order processiing things to happen. All the paperwork and ordering... have been completed and I now have the real SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition license key ....
I am very new to SQL Server and need to determine ...
1. Can I update the eval copy to become permanently licensed?
2. Would I want to upgrade the eval to permanent? Will I lose any capabilities by keeping the current eval setup?
If it is reasonable to keep the eval setup
3. How do I go about entering the license key to make it permanent?
If it is necessary to install the new Standard Edition...
4. How do I install it while maintaining the already defined databases, data, users, maintenance plan...
Thanks in advance for any and all help.
Chris
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2006
I'm working on upgrading VB6-based application to employ SQL Server 2005 Express (it currently uses MSDE). I'm using the following connection string -
Provider=SQLNCLI;Persist Security Info=False;User ID=my_user;Password=my_password;Initial Catalog=my_database;Data Source=my_pc;Packet Size=8000
The application runs exceedingly slow. As soon as I uninstall SQL Server 2005 Express edition and install SQL Server 2005 Developers edition speed increases in 5 to 10 times. Once I uninstall SQL Server 2005 Developers edition and install SQL Server 2005 Express edition the application's speed drops again.
I have repeated this "cycle" several times: install express -> running slow -> removed express, installed developers -> running fast -> removed developers, installed express -> running slow -> removed express, installed developers -> running fast, etc. etc. etc.
Some SQL2005-related articles I read stated that Express edition equals in performance to other editions. This turns out to be untrue.
Anybody please suggest any explanation to this misfortune.
Thank you.
Eugene
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2008
I am trying to upgrade SQL Server Express 2005 Report Server to SQL 2005 Standard and it fails with the following error:
SQL Server Setup did not have the administrator permissions required to copy a file: C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.8Reporting ServicesReportServer
ssrvpolicy.config. To continue, verify that the file exists, and either grant administrator permissions to the account currently running Setup or log in with an administrator account. Then run SQL Server Setup again.
After I click OK on the message, this whole path where the upgrade is bieng installed dissapears C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.8Reporting Services. The error is a bit missleading because the file that it is trying to copy rssrvpolicy.config does appear in that upgrade folder so I am not sure why it would try to copy a file that has already been copied.
I was able to upgrade the Database Engine instance fine but can't upgrade Reporting Services due to that error. I have verified that the account that ran the setup had the administrator permissions. Your prompt reply to my question would be greatly appreciatted.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2008
How do I upgrade Sql Server 2005 Express to SP2 if I also have SQL Server 2005 Enterprise SP2 already on the same box? I installed Sql Server 2005 Enterprise first, then applied SP2, then installed Visual Studio 2008 (which installed SQL Server 2005 Express).
When I try to upgrade Sql Server 2005 Express to SP2 using the special Express edition of SP2, I get an error message that says "None of the selected features can be installed". I end up having to cancel the install of SP2.
I'm left with SQL Server 2005 at level 9.0.3054 and SQL Server 2005 Express at 9.0.3042. How can I bring SQL Server Express 2005 to the same level as SQL Server 2005 Entperprise?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 29, 2006
if i upgrade from sql server 2005 expressto sql server 2005 enterprise can i do it ?
am i need to uninstall 2005 express before ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 29, 2006
Hi
I am trying to upgrade SQL Server 2005 Express to SQL Server 2005 Enterprise Edition.
(As a Preparation to install SQLServer2005 Service Pack 2 (CTP))
I tried to upgrade a particular Instance (OFFICESERVERS, which was based on SQL Server 2005 Express ).
During the upgrade I get a message saying that ...
.....Your upgrade is blocked because of edition upgrade rules.....
All other components I selected for Installation are propertly installed (Analysis, Reporting)
The setup log contains the following detail information:
---- Context -----------------------------------------------
Setting status of unmanaged components and removing unmanaged resources
Error Code: 29543
MSI (s) (DC!C8) [13:57:26:265]: Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 -- Error 29543. Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Edition check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of edition upgrade rules. For more information about edition upgrades, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Error 29543. Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Edition check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of edition upgrade rules. For more information about edition upgrades, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
<Func Name='SetCAContext'>
<EndFunc Name='SetCAContext' Return='T' GetLastError='0'>
Doing Action: ValidateUpgrade
PerfTime Start: ValidateUpgrade : Fri Dec 29 13:57:26 2006
<Func Name='ValidateUpgrade'>
<Func Name='updateFeatureSellection'>
Error Code: 0x80077367 (29543)
Windows Error Text: Source File Name: sqlcaupgradeproduct.cpp
Compiler Timestamp: Mon Sep 19 01:07:45 2005
Function Name: sqls::UpgradeProduct::CanUpgrade
Source Line Number: 142
---- Context -----------------------------------------------
I also tried to explicitly upgrade the OFFICESERVERS instance by executing Setup from the command shell:
start /wait setup.exe ADDLOCAL=SQL_Engine INSTANCENAME=OFFICESERVERS UPGRADE=SQL_Engine SKUU
PGRADE=1 /qb
The result is the same, i.e.... Your upgrade is blocked because of edition upgrade rules...
Does anybody know about this problem?
Some more information about the system:
W2K3 R2 Enterprise Edition
WSS3.0
MOSS2007
previously installed SQL Server 2005 Express Edition (Version 9.00.2047.00)
Kinde regards
Andreas
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2007
Hi,
We are performing a SQL 2005 SP1 upgrade from SQL 2000 on our Windows 2003 SP1 Standard Edition.
When we run the upgrade, we got a error "Upgrade Advisor Return -1" as a pop-up window.
When we run the Upgrade Advisor separately, we get this error :
===================================
Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program.
===================================
Common Language Runtime detected an invalid program. (System.Xml)
------------------------------
Program Location:
at System.Xml.Schema.SchemaInfo..ctor()
at System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaSet..ctor(XmlNameTable nameTable)
at System.Xml.XmlReaderSettings.get_Schemas()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.UpgradeAdvisor.ReportViewer.UAReportController.LoadAndValidateDataFile()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.UpgradeAdvisor.ReportViewer.UAReport.ValidateDataFile()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.UpgradeAdvisor.ReportViewer.UAIssueReport.Refresh()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.UpgradeAdvisor.ReportPanel.OpenReport(String reportFile)
We are in a lost for solutions. We do hope to hear from anyone asap...
Greatly appreciated for any kind assistance.
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2007
Hi,
We are running a test upgrade form sql 2000 standard edition 32 bit to sql 2005 developer edition 32bit. Followed through all the steps and specified the account(SA priveleges and currently used by the 2000 version) and is the local admin on the box for the services and the setup seemed to move fine, except for when it got to the point of installing database services - This is the error message that I got:
MSSQLServer could not be started. Verify you have sufficient priveleges to start system services. The was no choice but to hit cancel and then the set up progressed with a final message of 'SEtup failed'.
Here is a portion of the error log:
Attempting to recover in-doubt distributed transactions involving Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator (MS DTC). This is an informational message only. No user action is required.
Database Mirroring Transport is disabled in the endpoint configuration.
Starting up database 'master'.
Converting database 'master' from version 589 to the current version 611.
Database 'master' running the upgrade step from version 589 to version 590.
Error: 946, Severity: 14, State: 1.
Cannot open database 'master' version 589. Upgrade the database to the latest version.
System Task Aggregate global counters produced an error that was not handled. Major: 9, Minor: 46, Severity:14, State:1
Error: 928, Severity: 20, State: 1.
During upgrade, database raised exception 15151, severity 16, state 1, address 01C4C50B. Use the exception number to determine the cause.
Error: 15151, Severity: 16, State: 1.
Cannot find the endpoint 'TSQL Local Machine', because it does not exist or you do not have permission.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks KR
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2007
hi All .
I use Micorosft SQL 2005 upgrade advisor to upgrade from sql 2000 to sql 2005, but I got problem .
here is my problem .
On my machine I have Sql 2000 Developer without server pack, and Sql server 20045 express edition .
Please help me to overcome this problem .
Many thanks in advance .
regards,
QuachNguyen
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2007
There is a system running in win NT with DB SQL server 7.0, and now want to upgrade DB SQL server 7.0 to 2005 and run at window server 2003.
I want to konw that is there any impact to the system at DB part ? all the original script can be run normal when DB upgraded to 2005?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2007
Hi,
I have a problem about upgrading SQL server. We were using sql server 2005 express. Then we removed it and install sql server 2005 enterprise edition.
But now we cant start our services (those written by us .NET c#) We get some errors like
"Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM'. [CLIENT: <local machine>] "
What is the problem?
Thanks...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2007
I'm running SQL 2005 on a Windows 2000 server. I would like to upgrade the OS to Windows 2003 server. Is there a whitepaper with all the required steps listed?
Thanks,
Dave
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2008
Hi All,
Is there a way to print out reports of the errors and warnings created by the
SQL Server 2005 upgrade advisor?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2006
I am currently using sql server 2000 and I have just installed sql server 2005 in a separate box that will be used as the production server so I will be upgrading to the new database server soon.
I was reading the upgrade options for this situation and one option is to detach the 2000 database, copy the mdf and log files to the new server and attach it to mssql 2005. Another option is to recreate the tables, views, etc. and export/import the data to the new server.
I would like to ask what the best option is for this situation because I am not sure what the advantages and disadvantages of just detaching/attaching and recreating the database in sql server 2005. If I just detach/attach the database, will there be any disadvantage in the performance because the database files were created in 2000 and is functioning because of backward compatibility in 2005? Would it be better to recreate the database in 2005 and import the data from 2000 so that the database would be running in a way that is designed for 2005?
I am not really sure of the differences of these upgrade options so any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in Advance
-Voltaire
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2007
Team,
Got a question about one of the results on the upgrade advisor report.
When to Fix: Before
Description: Access is denied. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80070005 (E_ACCESSDENIED))
Object: SVCACCTREQ
It is looking like some type of permission problem but I cannot find anything about this specific issue.
I am running the advisor from my local machine, on which I am a local administrator, against a remote server where I am just a typical user.
Is this an error that would be corrected if I were to run the upgrade advisor logged into the server as a local administrator? I'm trying to determine whether there is anything that needs to be done with this issue.
Thanks.
Richard
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2006
Hello, I have sql server 2000 personal edition on my PC and I have just got a 2005 DVD. I tried to install it but it is not working. I don't know how to manage my databases. As if there is no graphical managemnt tool. The 2005 is also Personal edition.
I reinstalled the sql 2000, and now I'm trying t upgrade to sql 2005, but still don't know how to do that.
Please someone help me!!!!!!!!!!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2005
Probably this question has been asked hundreds of times and yet netsearch has not generated satisfactory enough answer, at least, to me.And OK, let's assume your organization has more than 200 employees,just one measure to indicate that it's not small and data processingneeds are quite extensive (for both OLTP and OLAP).We've heard so much about concurrency support, stability andperformance. Are there any real persuasive paper out there to talkabout it? Now, let me also put it in another perspective, say, you'rea Microsoft sql server sales guy or gal for that matter for newaccounts. What you got?Thanks.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 27, 2007
My instance of SQL Server Developer stopped working after upgrade of OS from Vista to XP. I have also installed SP1 & SP2. Still it is not working. The message that I get when I start SQL Server Management Studio is "The application cannot start."
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2007
How can I upgrade Sql Express SP1 to SQL Server 2005 Standard ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2008
I've inherited 6 sql server 2000 boxes. I've upgrade 3 with no trouble. now I have one that gives the message :
"your upgrade is blocked because of cross-language compatibility rules.
For more information about cross-language support, see the version..."
all servers are 2003, sp2. All SQL is Enterprise edition, default language is "english". even the collation order is
the same. why the cross language message? Any help would be good else I'll be forced to rebuild the DB and load application again. ugly!!
dave
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2007
Getting error upgrading from SP1 to SP2:
SQL Server Database ServicesConfiguring Components:
The installed has encountered an unexpected error. The error code is 2259. Database: Table(s) update failed
Attached is the section of the SQL setup log where the error occurs:
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:50:00:107]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Deleting SQLACCOUNT property. Its current value is 'NT AUTHORITYNETWORK SERVICE'.
<Func Name='updateFeatureSellection'>
Attempt to start service when it is already running
SQL service MSSQL$SQLEXPRESS started successfully waiting for SQL service to accept client connections
SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO (1) in OdbcConnection::connect
sqlstate=01000, level=-1, state=-1, native_error=5701, msg=[Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Changed database context to 'master'.
sqlstate=01000, level=-1, state=-1, native_error=5703, msg=[Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]Changed language setting to us_english.
<Func Name='SqlComponentUpgrade'>
<Func Name='SetCAContext'>
<EndFunc Name='SetCAContext' Return='T' GetLastError='111'>
<Func Name='ProcessHeaderTable'>
<Func Name='ProcessScriptTable'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='ProcessScriptTable'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:50:00:417]: Note: 1: 2259 2: 3: 4:
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
Error Code: 0x8007065b (1627)
Windows Error Text: Function failed during execution.
Source File Name: darlibviewinstaller.cpp
Compiler Timestamp: Wed Jun 14 16:19:22 2006
Function Name: sqls::ViewInstaller::modify
Source Line Number: 137
---- Context -----------------------------------------------
Setting status of unmanaged components and removing unmanaged resources
Failed to modify installer view
1: 2259 2: 3: 4:
Error Code: 1627
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:376]: Product: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express Edition -- Error 2259. The installer has encountered an unexpected error. The error code is 2259. Database: Table(s) Update failed
Error 2259. The installer has encountered an unexpected error. The error code is 2259. Database: Table(s) Update failed
<Func Name='SetCAContext'>
<EndFunc Name='SetCAContext' Return='T' GetLastError='203'>
Doing Action: ValidateUpgrade
PerfTime Start: ValidateUpgrade : Mon Mar 12 10:52:33 2007
<Func Name='ValidateUpgrade'>
<Func Name='updateFeatureSellection'>
<Func Name='SqlComponentUpgrade'>
<Func Name='SetCAContext'>
<EndFunc Name='SetCAContext' Return='T' GetLastError='111'>
<Func Name='ProcessHeaderTable'>
<Func Name='ProcessScriptTable'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
<Func Name='ProcessScriptTable'>
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:506]: Note: 1: 2205 2: 3: _sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:506]: Note: 1: 2228 2: 3: _sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence 4: CREATE TABLE `_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence` (`Action` CHAR(255) NOT NULL, `Sequence` INT NOT NULL, `Param` CHAR(0), `Retryable` INT NOT NULL, `Fatal` INT NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY `Action`, `Sequence`)
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:506]: Note: 1: 2262 2: _sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence 3: -2147287038
<Func Name='GetFileTargetPath'>
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:516]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '310719000'. Its new value: '325719000'.
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:516]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '325719000'. Its new value: '325759000'.
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:516]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '325759000'. Its new value: '325769000'.
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:516]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '325769000'. Its new value: '395769000'.
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:526]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '395769000'. Its new value: '576338000'.
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:526]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '576338000'. Its new value: '591338000'.
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:526]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '591338000'. Its new value: '621338000'.
MSI (s) (70!C4) [10:52:33:526]: PROPERTY CHANGE: Modifying Sql_sqlSqlUpgradeInstallSequence property. Its current value is '621338000'. Its new value: '621438000'.
Couldn't find SQL Agent service SQLAgent$SQLEXPRESS. Skipping service stop
Thanks for your help in advance,
Marty
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2006
I have multiple development SQL Servers running Enterprise edition that I want to upgrade for application testing before upgrading our production system. All of the servers meet the hardware and software requirements for SQL Server 2005 Enterprise edition. However, when I try to install to use the SQL Server 2005 Evaluation Edition to upgrade the servers in place, I get the blocked upgrade message:
Name: Microsoft SQL Server 2000
Reason: Your upgrade is blocked. For more information about upgrade support, see the "Version and Edition Upgrades" and "Hardware and Software Requirements" topics in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Edition check:
Your upgrade is blocked because of edition upgrade rules. For more information about edition upgrades, see the Version and Edition Upgrades topic in SQL Server 2005 Setup Help or SQL Server 2005 Books Online.
Can the Evaluation Edition be used to upgrade these servers or do you need the full blown version?
thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2007
I have downloaded SQLServer2005SP2-KB921896-x86-ENU.exe and attempted to update to SP2 with no success.
SQL Server 2005 Developers Edition is installed on my computer as part of a Visual Studio 2005 installation.
When I try to run this package under my admin account, I get through the Feature Selection (selecting everything) to Authentication.
When I press the Test button or the Next button, I get "Your account information could not be verified. Press Ok to return to Authentication Mode screen to determine the reason for failure. For setup to verify your credentials the services must be startable, connectable, and you must be a SQL Server administrator."
The Authentication screen shows "Database Services, MSSQLSERVER, Windows, domainusername, Service Failed to Start"
I am a novice SQL Server user, Clearly I am floundering! Any observations, advice, or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2007
Hi
I am trying to upgrade an existing SQL Server 2000(SP3) instance to 2005.
In the installation process it showed me an existing component SQL Server 2000. But when I select the checkbox and hit the next button to upgrade the Database Engine I get an error
"Microsft SQL Server 2005 Error 1603. The setup has encountered an unexpected error while NextUpgradeDialog."
I am logged in as Administrator and have full permission.
Any help is appreciated.
Following is the Log File
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup beginning at Tue Oct 09 11:30:49 2007
Process ID : 2940
E:Serverssetup.exe Version: 2005.90.1399.0
Running: LoadResourcesAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:48
Complete: LoadResourcesAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:48, returned true
Running: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:48
Loaded DLL:E:Serversxmlrw.dll Version:2.0.3604.0
Complete: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49, returned true
Running: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49
Complete: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49, returned true
Running: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49
Complete: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49, returned true
Running: PerformSCCAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49
Complete: PerformSCCAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49, returned true
Running: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49
Complete: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49, returned true
Delay load of action "DetectPatchedBootstrapAction" returned nothing. No action will occur as a result.
Action "LaunchPatchedBootstrapAction" will be skipped due to the following restrictions:
Condition "EventCondition: __STP_LaunchPatchedBootstrap__2940" returned false.
Running: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2007/9/9 11:30:49
Loaded DLL:C:WINDOWSsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.4042
Loaded DLL:C:WINDOWSsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.4042
Complete: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2007/9/9 11:30:50, returned true
Running: PerformDotNetCheck at: 2007/9/9 11:30:50
Complete: PerformDotNetCheck at: 2007/9/9 11:30:50, returned true
Running: ComponentUpdateAction at: 2007/9/9 11:30:50
Complete: ComponentUpdateAction at: 2007/9/9 11:31:44, returned true
Running: DetectLocalBootstrapAction at: 2007/9/9 11:31:44
Complete: DetectLocalBootstrapAction at: 2007/9/9 11:31:44, returned true
Running: LaunchLocalBootstrapAction at: 2007/9/9 11:31:44
Error: Action "LaunchLocalBootstrapAction" threw an exception during execution. Error information reported during run:
"C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup Bootstrapsetup.exe" finished and returned: 1603
Aborting queue processing as nested installer has completed
Message pump returning: 1603
Thanks
Reddy
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2007
Hi all,
My question might be a little bit unusual, but is it possible to upgrade SQL 2005 Express (the free version of SQL) to SQL 2000 Server without any loss of functionality?
Where do I have to pay attention to when doing this?
Thanks in advance!
MMQ
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
Hi All,
Currently we use SQL 2K SP4 and snapshot replication with a Central Publisher with Remote Distributor toplogy.
I am looking to upgrade or migrate our SQL servers to SQL 2005 and was wondering what is the best way to do this for our replicated architecture?
Is the best way to run the SQL 2005 Upgrade on all 3 servers (publisher, distributor, subscriber) and should it automatically upgrade the servers including the replication components? Is there anything i should consider/watch out for when doing the upgrade and it involves replication (namely snapshot replication)?
Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
