Hi,
I'm wondering if anybody can help me. I have to restore the database from the backup sent by vendor. Backup itself (backup_0906 file) is 60 MB. Below is a statement I run:
RESTORE DATABASE PDMUpload
FROM
DISK = 'e:ftpdirackup_0906'
WITH FILE = 1, NOUNLOAD , STATS = 10, RECOVERY ,
REPLACE ,
MOVE N'PDMUpload_Data' TO N'E:MSSQLDataPDMUpload_Data.MDF',
MOVE N'PDMUpload_Log' TO N'E:MSSQLDataPDMUpload_Log.LDF'
I get the following error messages:
Server: Msg 3257, Level 16, State 1, Procedure RestoreUpload, Line 9
There is insufficient free space on disk volume 'E:' to create the database. The database requires 28181331968 additional free bytes, while only 6759866368 bytes are available.
RESTORE DATABASE is terminating abnormally.
If anybody can explain why DB needs 28 GB???? BTW, there is 6 GB of diskspace available on E: drive.
I appreciate any help.
When I try to install MS SQl server2000 on windows XP machine,it says the server component is not supported by OS.What should I do to get it run on my machine?
Hi, I'm Arash Baseri a Sql Server2000 developer and mail you from Dubai (U.A.E). I have a problem in Sql Server locking table. My problem is not reasonable so the more I researched the more I understand it is not my problem .it is a bug in Sql Server2000. Now I explain the situation: I have two tables (Table A and Table B).Table A has a clustered index on col1 and col2, Table B has a clustered index on col1 and col2. I join these tables and update col3 in table A, like this begin tran insert [Table A] select * from Arshiv_Master where Col1 between 26001 AND 26001
Update AI31 set Col3=Case when 1=1 then 1 Else 0 End From [Table A]AI5, [Table B]AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 And AI31.Col1 Between 26001 And 26001 /* intentionally I didn't rollback or commit transaction to hold locks on table*/ In another connection I execute this query and I face "Lock request timeout period exceeded" error message. set lock_timeout 1 set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case when 1=1 then 0 Else 0 End From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 60000 Now the most interesting part is here .when I use a smaller data range for Col1 no error message is shown. A query like this set lock_timeout 1 set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case when 1=1 then 0 Else 0 End From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 50000 As you see the difference between the last two queries is on WHERE clause especially on data rages of Col1. As you know Sql Server 2000 has row level lock and when I acquire a lock on a record the other records are free. So what's wrong with Sql Server that assumes the others records are locked. I tested this situation in Sql Server 2005 and this problem was not seen so I think it's a bug in Sql Server 2000.Who can help me about this problem?
Hi, I'm Arash Baseri a Sql Server2000 developer and mail you from Dubai (U.A.E). I have a problem in Sql Server locking table. My problem is not reasonable so the more I researched the more I understand it is not my problem .it is a bug in Sql Server2000. Now I explain the situation: I have two tables (Table A and Table B).Table A has a clustered index on col1 and col2, Table B has a clustered index on col1 and col2. I join these tables and update col3 in table A, like this begin tran insert [Table A] select * from Arshiv_Master where Col1 between 26001 AND 26001
Update AI31 set Col3=Case when 1=1 then 1 Else 0 End From [Table A]AI5, [Table B]AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 And AI31.Col1 Between 26001 And 26001 /* intentionally I didn't rollback or commit transaction to hold locks on table*/ In another connection I execute this query and I face "Lock request timeout period exceeded" error message. set lock_timeout 1 set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case when 1=1 then 0 Else 0 End From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 60000 Now the most interesting part is here .when I use a smaller data range for Col1 no error message is shown. A query like this set lock_timeout 1 set transaction isolation level read uncommitted
Update AI31 set Col3=Case when 1=1 then 0 Else 0 End From [Table A] AI5, [Table B] AI31 where AI5.Col1=AI31.Col1 and AI31.Col1 between 45018 And 50000 As you see the difference between the last two queries is on WHERE clause especially on data rages of Col1. As you know Sql Server 2000 has row level lock and when I acquire a lock on a record the other records are free. So what's wrong with Sql Server that assumes the others records are locked. I tested this situation in Sql Server 2005 and this problem was not seen so I think it's a bug in Sql Server 2000.Who can help me about this problem?
HI, I have a application which has Access as Front end and SQLServer as BackEnd. I have a table which has student details.
Table Fields are: Record#,FirstName,LastName,MiddleName,Address,City ,State,Pin,..... The table has about 1200 records.
Every Thing works fine but in the front end when i try to do a search by FirstName it is VERY SLOW.But it is okey if i search by the Record#. I need to search by lastname or Firstname and speed up the process.
What are the experiences of those who have upgraded to SQL Server 2000? I am writing a paper for my company and wish to list features of SQL Server 2000 from a user/developer/business aspect. We are on SQL Server 6.5 and I need to highlight the advantages and disadvatages of upgrading.
I configured Logshipping in sql server 2000(Enterprise edition).in destination server copy and restore is failing(but there is no error).Out ofsync threshold value is set 27 minutes, after 27 minutes i found the error message in sql server error logs "The log shipping destination HARSHA.Northwind1 is out of sync by 27 minutes..
Just trying to get some information on what is required to migrate from Access 2000 to SQL Server?? Is it pretty difficult to do? Are there any changes to the data or structure that is needed? Is SQL Server more secure? What about MSDE instead of SQL?? I'm just needing some tips and info on what to expect and all as I think we are going there kinda soon. I can do many things in Access but not sure how to go about them in SQL Server? Can you also do reports from there as well?
There is a Server with 4G Memory. I installed a SQL Server 2000 standardversion on it.I heard that SQLServer2000 could use only up to 2GB memory. Is it true?How can I use those 4GB memory? I can not upgrade to SQL Server 2005 orother version because i don't want to take this risk.Thank you very much.
Hi, Is it possible to use ssis for the etl processes and still have an existing 2000 db? For e.g. CanI create a ssis pkg and use the xml task to download data to a 2000 db.
HI,Thank you to pay attention to this thread.i am chinese,may be i coudln't say my problem clearly,it's.....
okay,i use the TextBox,SQL Server 2000,i fill the TextBox as Chinese,then,I use the T-Sql INSERT to Finish Inserting A record,but when i open the SQL Server 2000,i find that the char showed in field as the char '???',i don't understand what happened,if the fault of UnicodeEncoding?can you help me? Thx~!
i have to create a cube in analysis manager in sql server 2000.as i want to see the data according to my organisation levels.
organisation level:
1.Business unit
2.Team manager
3.Sales manager.
and also i create the three user respectively and assign all user has adminstrator category in user accounts of windows XP.
after create the user and design the manage role to restrict the levels which i have create the dimension.after login which i have to create the user i can see all levels of data.
so pls solution for see data which i have to restrict the dimenssion only..
I have a big problem with SQL server2000. I can't get COLUMN DESCRIPTION. I will print DATADICTIONARY from a DB, I can get all elemnts (table name, columns name, datatype, precision, scale, FK, PK, default value..) I missed only DESCRIPTION. How I can get it????
Please Help me on this. I installed the two instances SQL on one box. ONe is default instance called ACSQL1(actually machine name) and the other one is called ACSQL1/DEVELOPMENT. THrought the my client site of SQL 2000 I can access both instances. When I try to get connection from VB. I can access the default instance but I can not access the second instance. Any ideas about this??? Qun Lu
Hi, I am new in SQL SERVER.I wanted to setup high availability database.It would be great if any one could answers my questions please. -What are the options availability for HA except clustering? -How to set up log shipping HA ? -How to monitor log shipping? -Is standby DB and log shipping same ? -Can I setup log shipping without backup/restore method.Like I have to create db1 on server A and create db1 on server B and then configure log shipping? -Is it necessary to ship log for master database or only user Database? Thx -Blace
I want make setup cd for my program and i use visualbasic 6 and SQL Server 2000 . What i should make and include my setup file to make it work with any one install it in his computer and we assume he dont have SQL Server2000 in his computer . Please help me on that Should SQL Server 2000 must alreeady installed on his computer? If its must be installed,Is there any way to make it easy through my setup file to make it install sql server automatic ? Can i make my program in visual basic create database and tables and relations and so. Please help me on that becuase its too Important. Thanks.
Hello, Can anyone please tell me the best way to upgrade server1 with SERVER7 and OS of NT to a new server2 with SERVER2000 AND WINDOWS 2000 ? The data in the old server is very important. Thanks
Thanks for the invitation to post a question, so I will post one.
I need to create a job step that uses cmdExec.
This is the command line I entering: D:odbcTimeClockUpdatesinReleaseTimeKeepingNo nLogouts.exe
When I run this job the job fails. When I look at the job history, the only information I get is the date and time, user that ran the job and the fact that it failed. I haven't been able to get any CmdExec job to run at all. Can anyone tell me what I'm doing wrong?
Facts. 1. This exact same command is used by my network administrator using windows scheduler on the server. The only reason he wants me to create an sql server job is because it's mostly sql functions. 2. I know the Sql Server agent is running, because I have other jobs that are run. 3. I have verified that I have permission to run the file because I can go to the actual directory and run the exe. 4. Do I need to enclose my command in quotes i.e. “D:odbcTimeClockUpdatesinReleaseTimeKeepingN onLogouts.exe” 5. the path of the file I need to run is the path on the server and not the path on my local machine.
If you need any other information, please let me know Thanks for you help GEM
Hello Everybody, I am importing an csv file into Sql Server straight forward no data cleansing or anything and i noticed everyday it misses the last row in the CSV file. Has anybody come accross this if so is there anything that i can do to get that row.
i have 10 to 15 records in my recordset object. i have to insert all these records in one call to the server instead of calling 15 times. i am new to sqlserver. please give me a solution with code.
hi at my work place some of the users migrated to another domain even thought with new domain name they can access SQL Server but user who are part of sysadmin(part of some group) on the box unable to execute a job. it means at operating system level newdomainuser credentials are get resolved that's why users are able to access box but why not able to execute jobs. why sysadmin Privilege not get resolved at SQL Server level very confused............
I have a database that had worked under msde 1.0 until reached the 2GBof dimension and the dB was blocked. To make possible the work i haddeleted old data from some table. The database restart, but theanswers from server become very slow. So i decided to pass to SqlServer 2000 without success. May i perform a check of this database?if is a indexs problem there is a way to rebuild them?Thanks in advanceAndy Wet
Dear GroupI'm having a very weird problem. Any hints are greatly appreciated.I'm returning two values from a MS SQL Server 2000 stored procedure to myASP.NET Webapplication and store them in sessions.Like This:prm4 = cmd1.CreateParameterWith prm4..ParameterName = "@Sec_ProgUser_Gen"..SqlDbType = SqlDbType.VarChar..Size = 10..Direction = ParameterDirection.OutputEnd Withprm5 = cmd1.CreateParameterWith prm5..ParameterName = "@Sec_ProgUser_Key"..SqlDbType = SqlDbType.VarChar..Size = 10..Direction = ParameterDirection.OutputEnd With....cmd1.ExecuteNonQuery()....Session("Sec_ProgUser_Gen") = prm4.ValueSession("Sec_ProgUser_Key") = prm5.ValueBoth output parameters are declared as varchar(10) within the storedprocedure. If I run the stored procedure in SQL Analyzer, I'm getting astring value for each of them. E.g. @Sec_ProgUser_Gen is "1110011",@Sec_ProgUser_Key = "1100".Now the strange thing happens if I try to run the following code:Sub MyTest()Dim MyString1 As StringDim MyString2 As StringMyString1 = CStr(Session("Sec_ProgUser_Key"))....MyString2 = CStr(Session("Sec_ProgUser_Gen"))End SubIt fails in line 'MyString2 = CStr(Session("Sec_ProgUser_Gen"))' with Castfrom type 'DBNull' to type 'String' is not valid.I don't understand this. They are both the same, the only difference is thelength of the string. Help!Additional Information:The values for @Sec_ProgUser_XXX are created in the stored procedure with astatement like this:SET @Sec_ProgUser_Key = (SELECT Convert(varchar(1),Key_CanCreateKey) +Convert(varchar(1),Key_CanCreateTransaction) +Convert(varchar(1),Key_CanView) + Convert(varchar(1),Key_CanDelete) FROMi2b_proguser_securityprofile WHERE SecurityProfileID = @SecurityProfileID)The datatype of the source columns used to be bit then changed them toInteger as I thought this might cause the problem. (Although it shouldn't asthe values get converted to varchar without a problem in the storedprocedure. No fields contain NULL values, only 1 or 0.
System.Data.Sql.Client.qlException: SQL server does not exist or access denied. at DataAccess.DataAccess.ExecuteInsertUpdateDeleteQuery(String prsConnString, String StoredProcName,sqlParameter[]parameterLost)
I want to write a stored procedure for the following, The table have the following field, CategoryID, CategoryName, Parent_categoryID 123 Kids Dresses 0 321 Kids Boys 123 322 Kids Baby 123 401 Kids Boys school Uniform 321 501 Kids Boys Formals 321 541 Kids Baby school Uniform 322 542 Kids Baby Formals 322 601 Household Textile 0 602 Bathrobe 601 603 Carpet 601 604 Table Cloth 601
From the above example the categoryID acts as a parent_categoryID for some products, when i pass a categoryID the stored procedure should return all the categoryID which are subcategory to given categoryID, subcategory may contain some subcategory, so when i give a categoryID it should return all the subcategoryID. For example when i pass categoryID as 123 it should return the following subcategoryIDs 321,322,401,501,541,542 because these are all subcategory of categoryID 123. How to write stored procedure for this?
Can any one tell me how to transfer bulk data from SQL Server6.5 to SQL Server2000.I have tried bcp out and bcp in to SQL Server2000 but it is taking very long time.Is there any way that I can pull the data into SQL Server2000 from SQL Server6.5.Can I use DTS feature of SQL Server2000 to pull the data from SQL Server6.5..
I'm using a VB6 application to access data from an SQL Server 2000 database. There are a few things I would like to do:
1. Get the number of tables in the database 2. Automatically begin reading data from each table in the database. Is it possible to write some code that will cause the application to start on first table retrieve all the data, then move to next table (similar to moving to next row)?
Hi, I have problem of order by clase. Must I specify the column in both select clause and order by clause so as to get the correct result?
If I omit the order by column in select clause(for example: select order.*, cl.ID from T_ORDER order, T_CLIENT cl where .... order by cl.code), would MS SQL server 2000 still correctly or ignore order by clause completely?
I want to convert the access2000 database to SQL server 2000. I am able to convert the tables but unable to convert the query as view in SQL server 2000.
please quide how to convert the query as view in sql server 2000.
