SQL Server 2005 For Two Applications With Different Collation Setting On Same Platform?
Nov 13, 2007
Hi ,
We want to install 2 applications that run on SQL server 2005 but the requirement of database installation are different Collation setting ( One require Dictionary order, case-insensitive, for use with 1252 Character Set and other require Dictionary order, case-sensitive, for use with the 437 (US English) Character set).
So the question here could I install both two applications successfully on same platform ? and if yes how?
Thanks and regards,
Quinh
View 5 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 14, 2007
Dear all,
How do i call an application, which is reside in another unix platform in my flow of execution.
I'll need to call this application after my data extraction is successfully run.
Thanks for the helps in advance.
Thanks & Best Regards,
PassionOrienter
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2007
Hello,
I've restored a SQL Server 2000 database with a Latin1_General_BIN collation from a .dmp file to a SQL Server 2005 server with a default collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. When I try to change the database collation I get hundreds of the following error:
The object 'CK_PM10200_GLPOSTD_00AF8CF' is dependent on database collation. So, in this case, is it even possible to change the collation if there are objects in the database that are dependent on it?
Thanks,
Bruce
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2003
On Win2000 server running SQL 2000 Enterprise edition, should the advanced setting on performance options for Win2000 be set for running background services or applications?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2006
Is this possible to connect do the Database Engine (on sql server 2005 on XP platorm - file *.mdf (not mobile *.sdf)) from win CE 5.0?
I tried to do this :
ConnectionStringSQLServerCE = "Data Source=WORK_STATION\SQLEXPRESS;Initial Catalog=dbMachines;Integrated Security=False;Password=Panel;User ID=Panel";
SqlCeConnectionCE = new SqlConnection(ConnectionStringSQLServerCE);
SqlCeConnectionCE.Open();
but I catch error:
catch (PlatformNotSupportedException ex)
€žPlatformNotSupportedException€?
I noticed that I see server because when I use:
ConnectionStringSQLServerCE = "Data Source=WORK_STATION\SQLEXPRESS";
zwraca błąd typu
catch (SqlException ex)
€śLogin failed for user ''. The user is not associated with a trusted SQL Server connection.€?
I used
using System.Data.SqlClient;
from Compact Framework 2.0 under Visual Studio 2005 Device Application Windows CE 5.0
can anyone help me?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2007
Is it ok to use SQL Server 2005 CE as an embedded DBMS inside a desktop (Windows XP / w2k3 / Vista) application?
The whitepaper available here: http://download.microsoft.com/download/A/4/7/A47B7B0E-976D-4F49-B15D-F02ADE638EBE/Compact_Express_Comparison.doc describes this as one of the primary usages of the product. However, I've seen information elsewhere on this forum that seems to imply that SQL Server 2005 CE is not allowed in desktop applications.
Can you please clarify this, and specify any limitations of this usage?
Also, the whitepaper refers to an online redistribution agreement that needs to be signed in order to freely redistribute SQL Server 2005 CE inside a commercial application. Can you please point to this agreement?
Thanks,
IonWarp
View 7 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2012
I currently have a server with the collation set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS.
However, some of the databases within the server are set to Latin1_General_BIN, probably because they were restored from another server some time ago. Also, even within the databases that have Latin1_General_BIN, some of the columns are set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS, very confusing to say the least.
What i would like to do is change the database collation settings for these databases to match the server setting. I would also like to change all of the tables within these databases to have the columns also set to the server collation settings.
I'm looking for the steps that i would need to take to make sure i don't mess anything up as these databases have there own sets of views and sp's that run each day.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2007
Can someone plz help me, how can i change the collation of an existing database?
Thank you in advnace
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2008
Thank you very much for your reply. I have one more question about collation. In my production server we have SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS and on other server (from where i want to move database to prod server) the collation is Latin1_General_CI_AI . can i move the database form one server to another even if they have different collation. The both servers are sql server 2005 and the production server is standard edition and the other server is developer edition. I wanted to move the databases from developer edition. Could some body help me with this. Thank you very much.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2007
Hi,
I have a DB which has its collation set to SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS and i need to change it to Latin1_General_CI_AS,
does anyone have any idea how to do this?
i have tried right clicking on the DB and changing its collation in the options tab, but this only changes what the default is, so all the old columns still have the old collatin,
does anyone know how to change this?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2007
Dear Members..
I am facing a problem with SQL server 2005 Secc. I have a Server with server collation Arabic_CI_AS. And i have a databse in it which has a collation SQL_Latin1_General_CP1256_CI_AS. The issue started with me when i am trying to create a Integrated seccuroty for some users in my firm. I have created a DatabaseRoll for in the database. There is no problem while creating it. I have added the user in the seccurity login on the server and then i added these users in the database Seccurity users. After that i applied the created roll to that users. It being created perfectly. But the issue is coming when i want to modify the seccurity policy (Seccurables) of any user from the database.
(Properties of Users --> Seccurables )
Its showing an error. as follows
------------------------------
Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.SmoEnum)
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
urn could not be resolved at level DatabaseRole.
------------------------------
I am not understanding why its coming with this situation.
==========================================================
Also sometimes its showing an error when i am trying to see the login prperties of that user in the database logins.
Server--> Seccurity --> Logins --> Properties --> Seccurables -->Err.
As follows
------------------------------------------
Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.SmoEnum)
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
Cannot resolve the collation conflict between "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" and "Arabic_CI_AS" in the UNION operation. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 468)
------------------------------
Hope some body can help me in this....
Thanks in Advance....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 11, 2008
we have a problem with the collation of databases between sql server 7.0 and SQL SERVER 2005. The message that pops up is next:
"Mensagge. 468, level 16, state 9, Line 1
Problem of collation can not be solved between "Compatibility_52_c0a_30001" and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS of UNION command.
Te script is lanch from sqlserver 2005, and it doesn´t work with UNION command but it works if you lanch them separately.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2007
A few collation questions on SQL Server 2005 SP2, which I'll call SQLS.The default collation for SQLS is apparently SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS.I wish to use a variation of this, SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CS_AIcollation, but there is no such collation returned fromfn_helpcollations(). Also, if I try to use this collation ina CREATE DATABASE stmt, SQLS yells about it.I see that there is a Latin1_General_CS_AI. What effects are therein using this collation? The SQL_* collations are SQL collations,while non-SQL_* collations are Windows collations, yes? SQLS runsonly on Windows, so am I safe in using Latin1_General_CS_AI? Whatdoes the CP1 in the SQL collation signify? Am I asking for trouble?------------------------------------Assuming that I set Latin1_General_CS_AI (or any other case-sensitivecollation) at the database level, I believe my DDL/DML for that databasealso becomes case-sensitive. How can I specify that I want ONLY my dataaccess to be case-sensitive, and not my DDL/DML? I don't want to haveto remember to type "select * from MyCamelCase" when "mycamelcase"should work.Any help appreciated.A new SQLS DBA..aj
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2007
Pls, any one help me regarding the how to change the collation name of the server in SQL server 2005.
In SQL server 2000 we can do with rebuildm.exe, like that is there any one.
Thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2007
Hello All-
Our production sql 2000 systems have collation setting as "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS". The new production db server[sql 2005] has been installed and configured with "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" collation.
The issue is with the dev est servers. A few of them has been configured with collation "Latin1_General_CI_AS". Recently I have noticed a string comparison failed with collation related message due to the serverdb collation difference.
I have not come across any specific collation recommendation from Microsoft. Are there any specific recommendations from Msft on collation? I can forsee issues, if we have to perform any testsany feautre development on a production copy in dev est environments which involves string comparisons.
This issue is more important since we are on a Migration path which involves large some number of servers in dev est environments. My recommendation to the team at our place was to rebuild the already configured servers which has "Latin1_General_CI_AS" collation and change the server collation to "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS".
I would really appreciate if you could share your thoughts on this issue.
TIA,
Mkumar
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2007
Hello All-
Our production sql 2000 systems have collation setting as "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS". The new production db server[sql 2005] has been installed and configured with "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" collation.
The issue is with the dev est servers. A few of them has been configured with collation "Latin1_General_CI_AS". Recently I have noticed a string comparison failed with collation related message due to the serverdb collation difference.
I have not come across any specific collation recommendation from Microsoft. Are there any specific recommendations from Msft on collation? I can forsee issues, if we have to perform any testsany feautre development on a production copy in dev est environments which involves string comparisons.
This issue is more important since we are on a Migration path which involves large some number of servers in dev est environments. My recommendation to the team at our place was to rebuild the already configured servers which has "Latin1_General_CI_AS" collation and change the server collation to "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS".
I would really appreciate if you could share your thoughts on this issue.
TIA,
Mkumar
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2006
Hi,
I have following problem:
My production problem enviornment is:
Windows Server 2003 Standard x64 edition with Service Pack 1
SQL Server 2005 with .Net Framework 2.0 for 64bit machines.
I have a .Net application that uses assemlies that use COM references, so I have my application compiled with target platform x86 so that it can use COM Interop and can run in WOW64. All of my assemblies are compiled for x86 target platform.
We are using the same set of assemblies on 32bit machines and SQL server 2005 with 2.0 framework for 32 bit machines.
Now, I have one of my assemblies target platform x86, being used in SQL server 2005 on 64 bit machines using CLR. The assembly gets installed fine, but when I call the function I get following error on 64 bit machines only. 32 bit machines do not have any problem:
Msg 10314, Level 16, State 11, Line 1
An error occurred in the Microsoft .NET Framework while trying to load assembly id 65548. The server may be running out of resources, or the assembly may not be trusted with PERMISSION_SET = EXTERNAL_ACCESS or UNSAFE. Run the query again, or check documentation to see how to solve the assembly trust issues. For more information about this error:
System.IO.FileLoadException: Could not load file or assembly 'echalk.common, Version=7.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=77f22df29f1a5e39' or one of its dependencies. The given assembly name or codebase was invalid. (Exception from HRESULT: 0x80131047)
System.IO.FileLoadException:
at System.Reflection.Assembly.nLoad(AssemblyName fileName, String codeBase, Evidence assemblySecurity, Assembly locationHint, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean throwOnFileNotFound, Boolean forIntrospection)
at System.Reflection.Assembly.InternalLoad(AssemblyName assemblyRef, Evidence assemblySecurity, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean forIntrospection)
at System.Reflection.Assembly.InternalLoad(String assemblyString, Evidence assemblySecurity, StackCrawlMark& stackMark, Boolean forIntrospection)
at System.Reflection.Assembly.Load(String assemblyString)
We are using the same exact steps but I get the above error in 64bit machines. I know if I had the asseblies compiled with AnyCPU, it works on both sql servers but then my application fails in 64 bit machines. If I compiled all my assemblies with x86 platform then application works but sql server functions stop working on 64 bit machines. Is there a work arount that I could use so that I don't have to create 2 sets of assemblies for application and sql server seperate.
Any help would be appreciated. Also thanks in advance.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2008
Hi,
I'm installing SQL Server 2005 on windows 2003 R2.
Which Collation Designator is to be used so that the both English as well as Arabic characters can be stored simultaneously...?
That is "The collation settings designator which support both Arabic as well as English character set"...
Thanks,
Vivek
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2008
Scenario
Recently moved a SQL2000 database to SQL2005.
Collation on SQL 2000 database server was SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS
Colaltion on SQL 2005 database server is Latin1_General_CI_AS
After restoring the SQL 2000 database on SQL 2005 we observed that the database collation was SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS. We have altered the database collation to Latin1_General_CI_AS. We understand this will work for all new objects created on the database but existing objects (prior to the collation change) will continue to have the 'SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS' collation.
What is the best method to change the collation of the older columns to 'Latin1_General_CI_AS' -
1) Run ALTER TABLE ALTER COLUMN <colname> <datatype> COLLATE Latin1_General_CI_AS <nullability>
on each varchar/char column
or
2) For each table
BCP out data
DROP TABLE
RECREATE TABLE (taking the new collation Latin1_General_CI_AS)
BCP in data
3) Other methods?
Thanks in advance
David.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2008
I need a SQL Server 2005 SP2 instance with a collation of SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_BIN2. After installing SP2, the collation is SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_BIN, and none of the patches I can find seem to want to work (they are all apparently written for SQL Server 2000).
Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2006
I have just upgraded to SQL Server 2005 from SQL Server 2000.In Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio, when I click on databaseproperties, I receive the following error:-Cannot resolve the collation conflict between"Latin1_General_CI_AS"and "SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS" in the equal to operation.(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 468)Some reference suggest that I can change the database collation byclicking database properties!What can I do?
View 21 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2006
I am having a nightmare getting an answer about what type of licensing I will need for the standard addition of SQL Server 2005 for my asp.net application and wonder if anyone has any advice.
As I see it its very simple, I have a web app that makes a connection to SQL via a connection string using a single username and password, no impersonation just straight SQL authentication.
For this simple scenario I figured I would need to get a SQL 2005 license and then 1 Client access license (CAL), this being a nice affordable way of doing things BUT I am being told by different sources, that I may need to license on a per processor basis as any user of my web application, anonymous or otherwise needs a client access license and given that I don’t know how many users are going to access my website I would need to go for the larger outlay and purchase two standard processor license (my sql server is a dual processor machine).
Can anyone tell me if this is the case, is a connection from a ASP.Net website to a SQL server for my website visitors regarded as a new client and therefore needs a client access license or the large investment of a per processor license?
I would stick with SQL Express but at 4gigs max it won’t do the job.
Thanks in advance.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2015
I am using SQL Server 2008. In ServerProperty function, there are two properties called “Collation” and “CollationID”. In some cases, I will only know the CollationID. Is it possible get the collation name from the CollationID? Is there a function called CollationNameFromID?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2000
I am using windows 98 and I want te use SQL server 7.0. I have installed the non-enterprise edition....But it won't work....
The service manager in istalled succesfully and all the other utilities to.
But it still wont work. Is somebody out there who can help me on this.
Tnx
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2007
I've got XEON x64 server and after SQL Server 2005 installation found that the platform in property says AMD64 and not INTEL64 as expected.
I was assured by our service provider that AMD64 platform is the correct one as it was compiled for INTEL x64.
Does anybody have an answer to it?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2007
I am writing applications for barcode readers that send and receive information via wi-fi to a 2003 Server running the full MS SQL Server 2005. The readers are both XP and CE .NET 5.00 based.
The information is time critical so I need to scan a barcode then send that information to the SQL Server and then in turn run a query based upon it which then displays on the reader. I have no problem with the XP devices as I can link via ODBC to the SQL Server. These work perfectly.
I can also run a program on a XP desktop using Remote Desktop on the CE device which again works fine.
The CE .NET 5.00 readers are a problem as I cannot use OBDC or OLE DB owing to the platform.
Is there any method available where I can query the SQL Server directly without using some kind of third party product like ViaDB from Odyssey Software? I cannot use replication owing to the time constaints.
Any suggestions or gentle prods would be appreciated.
Norman
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2006
Can anyone tell me why I am getting this error when I try to select * from a table through a newly created synonym? I have admin rights to both db, but they are on separate servers.
<Error>
OLE DB provider "SQLNCLI" for linked server "srvDEV" returned message "Communication link failure".
Msg 10054, Level 16, State 1, Line 0
TCP Provider: An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host.
Msg 18456, Level 14, State 1, Line 0
Login failed for user 'NT AUTHORITYANONYMOUS LOGON'.
</error>
<code>
CREATE SYNONYM ARContractTerms_syn FOR srvDEV.EricsAdeptCastle.dbo.tblARContractTerms
SELECT * FROM ARContractTerms_syn
</code>
Am I running into schema problems?
Thanks all
Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio 9.00.2047.00
Microsoft Analysis Services Client Tools 2005.090.2047.00
Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) 2000.085.1117.00 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158)
Microsoft MSXML 2.6 3.0 4.0 6.0
Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0.2900.2180
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0.50727.42
Operating System 5.1.2600
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2007
Is there any setting to indicate Unicode data to handle, so that no need to exclusively use Unicode data types ( ex nvarchar ).
I need to execute both Unicode and non Unicode SQL statements with in one environment. I don't want to create seperate database again.
Please let me know if any one had approached on SQL server this way. I am looking the way Oracle provides where you don€™t need to declare the data type of the column as Unicode type in table definition but can indicate when running a query to manipulate that field as Unicode field.
Thank youSunil
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2007
Hi there
im trying to set up a replication from a local server to a remote server.
when starting up and selecting the Distribution / publisher, i get the following errors --->
Details as followed...
TITLE: New Publication Wizard
------------------------------
SQL Server is unable to connect to server 'SERVERX'.
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.2050.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.PubWizardErrorSR&EvtID=CantConnect&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
SQL Server replication requires the actual server name to make a connection to the server. Connections through a server alias, IP address, or any other alternate name are not supported. Specify the actual server name, 'SERVERY'. (Replication.Utilities)
------------------------------
BUTTONS:
OK
------------------------------
and...
===================================
SQL Server is unable to connect to server 'SERVERX'. (New Publication Wizard)
------------------------------
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.2050.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.PubWizardErrorSR&EvtID=CantConnect&LinkId=20476
===================================
SQL Server replication requires the actual server name to make a connection to the server. Connections through a server alias, IP address, or any other alternate name are not supported. Specify the actual server name, 'SERVERY'. (Replication.Utilities)
------------------------------
Program Location:
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.ReplicationSqlConnection.CheckServerAlias(ServerConnection conn)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.ReplicationSqlConnection.Open()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.CreatePublicationWizard.PrepareToShow()
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2007
Hi, All:
We have to migrate several 64Bit SQL Servers to 32Bit platform. Due to the 64Bit source systems are all production system, the downtime is too limited. So we can only get the DB files via Detach way. Among the source systems, both SQL2000 and SQL2005 exist.
My question are:
Is it possible to migrate the DB from 64Bit to 32Bit via Detach/Attach?
If ok, how to do that?
Any info will be highly appreciated! Thanks!
Best Regards,
Kevin
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2005
Hi,I had the SQL Server Express installed on my desktop and it was working just fine. Now, I upgraded to .Net 2.0 and I had some problems with the SQL Server Express just like in post http://forums.asp.net/1070169/ShowPost.aspx.These problems were solved by using a cleanup tool but now when i try so setup the SQL Server Express 2005 i get the error:SQL Server Component Update will install the following components for SQL Server Setup:- (ok) Microsoft SQL Native Client- (error) Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup Support FilesErrors occurred during the installation:Error 1603 installing Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup Support Files.See log file for more detailed information.Fatal error during installation.The log file as lots of information such as:Product : Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English) Product Version : 9.00.1399.06 Install : Failed Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0010_WS10170_Support.log Last Action : InstallFinalize Error String : The installer has encountered an unexpected error. The error code is 2908. Could not register component {1F3316BE-825B-4390-A9D2-AF3EECCAE9F6}. Error Number : 2908 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WS10170 : There was an unexpected failure during the setup wizard. You may review the setup logs and/or click the help button for more information. Can someone please help me on trying to avoid format the desktop.Thanks,Stromberg
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2006
My manager has asked me to install and configure Source Safe so that our team can check out stored procedures, (and other objects), and check them back in when we are finished working on them.
I'm not familiar with Visual Source Safe. Does SQL Server 2005 work with Visual Source Safe in such a way that I can check out/in SQL Server objects such as procedures?
If someone knows the answer, or perhaps an existing thread that covers this, please let me know.
Thank you for your time!
Frank
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
I have recently upgraded my databases from SQL 2000 to 2005. In 2000, I could set the network affinity so that sql server was only accessible from one of the two network cards. I cannot find how to do this in sql 2005. Is there a way?
In my installation, I have two network cards in each server. The "A" network adapter connects to the "A" hub, and the "B" adapter connected to the "B" hub. Traffic on trhe "B" hub is my private, non-routable network, This is where I want the SQL Server traffic to run. The A hub traffic is the public network. This gives me the ability to isolate SQL Server from the outside world.
View 1 Replies
View Related
