SQL2005 Performance Problem
Mar 20, 2008
We have an installed site with two SQL2005 servers (workgroup, SP2).
At the publisher we recently (yesterday) bulk inserted about 2million lines
into a table from a third server that's going to be part of the replicating
group. However, since importing these records (using 'Import Data' to get
the data in and then running a no-change update to make replication aware of
them) the performance has become dreadful. The hard-drive is swamped with
disk writes.
The first symptom that something was wrong was when replication started
timing out, even when I turned off all subscriptions except for one - and
that one didn't have any of its tables modified by the import. Even putting
the agent on a slow profile with extended query timeouts doesn't help.
Any suggestions?
Many thanks.
Jim
--
http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk
"When one of the local cats, an especially fluffy creature with a vast
tail, rushed down the street towards me the other day, mewing delightedly,
I have to admit it was probably shouting 'HAZ CHEZBURGR?' " - Bella, ucsm
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 19, 2008
Hi,We have shifted one of our data processing to a new instance of SQL2005. For this a new DB was created in SQL2005 and it is not anupgrade of SQL200 DB.The data processing application is a VB6 application that runs a batchprocess to insert about4.5 million records everyday in this SQL 2005 database. I am usingADO(ver 2.6) Connection object to execute T-SQL insert statements toinsert the 4.5 mill. records.This same application used to insert the data in the SQL 2000databaseand used to take about 2.5 hours to do so. After moving it to SQL2005 the performance has really detriorated and it now takes morethan6 hours.Is there any configuration change that I need to do in SQL 2005?Please help.Note: There is also an instance of SQL 2000 running in the sameserver.TIA,Tawfiq
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2007
Hi,I wondered in anyone can help with the following problem that i'mexperiencing, i'll try to provide as much info as possible and anysuggestions would be appreciated.I have just started at an organsiation and there seems to be slowperformance maybe on the san on a 64bit itanium dual core machine. 4CPUs are being showed to sql server, it also has 16gb of RAM. I'llstart with the configuration of the SAN.After speaking to the SAN guy, rather than carve the SAN up intodifferent area's for san Logs/Data etc they have gone for the approachof spreading a Vdisk across as many spindles as possible (All 145 ofthem). So the area that is presented to the SQL Server according thethe SAN guys is a vraid 5 stripe made up of all 145 disks which areall 72gb fibre-channel disks.This storage is not just made available to sql server but also madeavailable to other apps as well that need storage. Having read themanufactres best practice on setting this up there is a valid argumentfor doing this.The bandwidth from the SAN is 2Gb fibre, with each computer that usesthe SAN having 2Gb fibre cards.Clearly, that could act as a bottle-neck. But, there's nothing thatcan be done about it according to the SAN guy.Needless to say, any changes on the SAN are pretty much going to beout of the question as far as he's concerned but i think performanceisn't that good for the type of box they have and the SAN its attachedto.The 2nd thing i'll explain is the setup of the database in question,firstly whoever set it up split the database into 16 different file of4 filegroups so the table that i'm selecting to is in one filegroupsplit over 4 files and the the table selecting from is in anotherfilegroup made up of another 4 files. These are placed on the samephysical disk made up of the SAN LUN with 145 spindles.Anyway when i do a select from a sales table which has various groupbys and then insert the results into a blank table with no indexes itcan take over 2hours for 200k rows which i find very slow.When i look at the sysprocesses table i am getting various waits asfollows :-72427200x0042900PAGEIOLATCH_SH 6:9:219209472427200x00690SLEEP_TASK72427200x00000SOS_SCHEDULER_YIELDThe process seams to be going inbetween a PAGEIOLATCH andSOS_SCHEDULER_YIELD a few times per second.Running the following to get io stalls gives the following :-Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,7)Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,8)Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,9)Select * from sys.dm_io_virtual_file_stats (6,10)gives results like :-67170853985015624218246512844829457222526431245540454412438340307010565449074954240x0000000000000954It worries me that when the process is on the PAGEIOLATCH the waitcan be over 1000. Is it normal for the wait to be this long and whatwould be the best way to prove one way or another if the configurationof the san is causing this kind of performance???Thanks for any suggestions in advanceIan.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2007
Can anyone comment on the engine performance difference between SQL2005 Enterprise Edition versus Standard? I'm talking generalized performance of the engine and not admin features (parallel index operations) or scaled-storage (partitioning)
( http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/enterprise/comparison.mspx )
The marketing literature makes note of two things:
Enterprise can use more then 4 processors
Enhanced read-ahead and scan (super scan)
(note: I cannot find anything about this 'feature')
One un-noted Feature:
only Enterprise supports 'lock pages in memory'
We are in the process of migrating from SQL2000 to SQL2005 in an OLTP environment. Based on the marketing literature; I would have chosen SQL2005-standard. But based on our limited testing, we are seeing some strange differences.
Query Performance
With MaxDOP=1 and using a large batch query (select top 1500000); SQL2005-Enterprise is twice as fast as SQL2005-Standard.
(Note: this difference persists regardless of lock-pages-in-memory setting)
CPU Utilization
In addition, taskmgr shows that SQL2005-Enterprise uses a single processor at ~90%. While SQL2005-Standard shows a single processor at ~20%.
Lock Behavior
We are also seeing lock-behavior differences. A single DML statement that attempts to modify ~5000 rows will cause Table-locks on SQL2005-Standard but obtain normal row-locks on SQL2005-Enterprise.
These empirical differences make me wonder if the engine codebase is fundamentally different between the two?
Any insight would be appreciated.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2006
We are experiencing a major issue since upgrading from SQL2000 to SQL2005 over the weekend. Starting today, it appears that the performance of SQLServer reaches a limit every 15 minutes.
Our configuration is as follows:
Window Server 2K3 x64 Enterprise
SQLServer 2005 x64 Enterprise
HP DL585 with 4 dual core Opterons
32 GB of RAM
2 TB EMC SAN
At first, I thought there was a memory pressure problem, since I had the default max memory set. After changing the max memory to only 25 GB (out of 32 available), the issue went away temporarily. However, after 15-20 minutes, the number of batches/sec dropped in half, and remained after half until I changed the max memory setting again. Over the course of the day, I was able to fix the issue each time by just changing the max memory by 1MB. (From 30,000 to 29,999 and back from 29,999 to 30,000). Each time, the batches/sec counter immediately doubles and remains there for about 15-20 minutes. None of the SQL statements have changed since upgrading.
I have found this post, which talks about a similar issue at the end of the thread:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=746299&SiteID=1
Any ideas?...this is frustrating to no end.
Thanks!
Ryan
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2005
hi
i try to restore a bak file from another sql2005 server to my sql2005 server, but it show the error message as below :
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express
------------------------------
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Cannot open backup device 'C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLBackupackup.bak'. Operating system error 5(error not found).
RESTORE HEADERONLY is terminating abnormally. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 3201)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.1399&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=3201&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
BUTTONS:
OK
------------------------------
pls some one can help me ???
thanks
chaus
View 62 Replies
View Related
Oct 12, 2007
Can you open/use a database created in SQL2005 in SQL2005 Express?
Thanks for the help!
Max
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2005
I just upgraded my SQL 2000 server to SQL2005. I forked out all that money, and now it takes 4~5 seconds for a webpage to load. You can see for yourself. It's pathetic. When I ran SQL2000, i was getting instant results on any webpage. I can't find any tool to optimize the tables or databases. And when I used caused SQL Server to use 100% cpu and 500+MB of ram. I can't have this.Can anyone give me some tips as to why SQL 2005 is so slow?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 4, 2007
Hi
We have Sql2005 x64 bit standard edition server installed in windows 2003 64 bit editio server,
currently due to buisness requirements we need to have sql2005 x64 bit enterprise edition, please let me know how do i do the upgrade or change.
is it possible to retain all our custom settings in the standard edition after changing to enterprise edition.
This has to be done for our production and very critical, please help
Thanks
Samuel I
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 19, 2007
I am unable to install 32-bit SQL Server Integration Services on the server due to something that was left behind by the 64-bit version.
I've uninstalled SQL Server 2005 64-bit and when I try to install the 32-bit version of Integration Services, I get this error: "Failed to install and configure assemblies C:Program Files (x86)Microsoft SQL Server90DTSTasksMicrosoft.SqlServer.MSMQTask.dll in the COM+ catalog. Error: -2146233087 Error message: Unknown error 0x80131501 Error descrition: FATAL: Could not find component 'Microsoft.SqlServer.Dts.Task.MessageQueueTask.ServCompMQTask' we just installed."
I can't seem to figure out how to resolve this problem with the COM+ and I can't remember if Integration Services is required.
Can anybody please advise?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2007
Hello,
I have a vb program that include a dts package that has been saved to vb with sql2000 dts wizard and works very good.
Now that I upgrade my website to sql2005, this vb dts package doesn't work.
The error I get is:
Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package
Invalid STDGMEDIUM structure
(Microsoft Data Transformation Services (DTS) Package (80040066): Invalid STDGMEDIUM structure
) (Microsoft SQL-DMO (ODBC SQLState: 42000) (80004005): [Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near ')'.)
I searched in the internet how to make dts package in sql2005 and save it to vb and found no information about it.
What Can I do to get the vb code of the dts package I create in sql2005 or how do i migrage the sql2000 vb dts package code to sql2005?
Thanks,
Kubyustus
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2006
I have some production boxes on Win 2000 32-bits OS and some production servers have been upgraded to Win2003 64-bit OS runing SQL Server 2005. There are also a number of Win2003 32-bit OS running SQL 2005.
The issue is that when linking the 64-bit production servers to the 32-bit boxes running SQL 2005 / Win 2003 OS, the linking seems to succeed, but I am unable to see a number of entries in sys.objects. Typically, these objects are User Stored Procedures.
Moreover, the linking seemed to have worked, but data extraction does not take place between the servers. However, there are no errors. The objects (user stored procs) exist on the 64-bit side, but linking does not actually happen.
Microsoft KB has addressed this in SQL 2000 case in this KB article, but has not suggested a solution for SQL 2005.
Any ideas? Has anyone else encountered this?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2004
1. Use mssql server agent service to take the schedule
2. Use a .NET windows service with timers to call SqlClientConnection
above, which way would be faster and get a better performance?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2006
Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server witha particular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return100 rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query insingle user mode. So I tested the query on the Development server bytaking a backup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the devserver. I ran the same query and found that it ran in less than asecond.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue isrelated to some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc.Or could it be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQLServer configuations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating systemrelated issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 27, 2007
when iam trying to open a table in sqlserver 2005 it is showing an error as
SELECT permission denied on object 'LoginDetails', database 'LOGIN', schema 'dbo'.
how to rectify the error.
plz help me.
Thnaks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2008
Dear all,
Is it possible to say sql server 2005 to use this much number of CPU..?
For Example I have 1 CPU License of SQL 2005, but I have 2 sockets in my physical box. One socket is having 2 cores. So I want to say the SQL server (2005) to use the 2 cpu's only( i.e Any of one socket)
Please advise me to do this.
I have one more question,
Is there any CPU limitation for SQL 2005 and 2008? If Yes how much cpu we can allot for the SQL 2005 and 2008
Thanks
Lakshmi.S
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2007
Hi All,
Can you send a SMS (text message to a cell phone) from stored proc?
Can it be done in SQL Server 2005?
Thanks
Live Today as if tomorrow is a DAY away :) - SuperGreen
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2007
On the MSDN site, I noticed new releases of SQL 2005, SP-2, dated on 4/5/2007. Are these an actual "update" to original release of SP-2?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
I am installing sql2005 sp1 on a w2k3 Cluster. All we need is the database engine however the vendor I am working with said to install sp1 which is fine but they also said you need to install Integration services with SP1 for the Maintenenace plans.
Do I need to install Integration services on the cluster to create maintenance plans with sql2005 sp1 ??
I am getting mixed answers.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2006
I hope you would help me in this problem. I use the code below for executenonquery command for mdb DB.But I do not know the changes I should made when Using SQL2005.-------------Dim connectionString As String = "Provider=Microsoft.Jet.OLEDB.4.0; " & _ "Data Source=C:ASPNET20dataNorthwind.mdb" Dim dbConnection As New OleDbConnection(connectionString) dbConnection.Open() Dim commandString As String = "INSERT INTO Employees(FirstName, LastName) " & _ "Values(@FirstName, @LastName)" Dim dbCommand As New OleDbCommand(commandString, dbConnection) Dim firstNameParam As New OleDbParameter("@FirstName", OleDbType.VarChar, 10) firstNameParam.Value = txtFirstName.Text dbCommand.Parameters.Add(firstNameParam) Dim lastNameParam As New OleDbParameter("@LastName", OleDbType.VarChar, 20) LastNameParam.Value = txtLastName.Text dbCommand.Parameters.Add(LastNameParam) dbCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() dbConnection.Close()--------
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 31, 2005
What is the quivalent of EM for SQLExpress2005? With the old SQL 2000 I used EM to manage tables, SPs and such. Now, I cannot even find the databases - I installed the Club Starter Kit and I want to view and modify some tables. How do I do that?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2006
Hi folks,
i have VSTS installed and TFS beta refresh 3. all is working fine.
How can i use Visual Studio 2005 to create a new database on the remote server? i can connecto to it fine using the 'server explorer' tab .. but of course it only lists databases that currently exist. How can i create a new one?
lastly, i have no installed sql2005 express edition or whatever it is called LOCALLY on my machine. the reason i didn't do this is becuase i was hoping to use the enterprise sql 2005 server.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2006
Help... I am new to C# and .net and I am trying to build a insert page with a couple of drop down controls where I pull a categoryID and subcategoryID to populate my dropdown controls from a MS sql2005 express database. I am using a book that only shows how to build the script and access a access database and I am getting this error when trying to pull up the page:
Description: An error occurred during the compilation of a resource required to service this request. Please review the following specific error details and modify your source code appropriately. Compiler Error Message: CS0246: The type or namespace name 'OleDbConnection' could not be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?)Source Error:
Line 3:
Line 4: <script runat="server" language="C#">
Line 5: OleDbConnection objConn = newOleDbConnection(
Line 6: "Server=SIMBA\NETSDK;" +
Line 7: "Database=btuniverse;" +Source File: c:Inetpubwwwroot\_addnews.aspx Line: 5
Below is my code and I am not sure what the syntax needs to be when connecting to a ms sql datasource. Thanks in advanced :)
MYCODE:
<%@ Page Language="C#" MasterPageFile="~/main.master" Title="Untitled Page" %>
<script runat="server" language="C#"> OleDbConnection objConn = newOleDbConnection( "Server=SIMBA\NETSDK;" + "Database=btuniverse;" + "User ID=sa;Password=password"); OleDbCommand objCmd; OleDbDataReader objRdr; void Page_Load() { if (!IsPostBack) { objConn.Open(); objCmd = new OleDbCommand("SELECT * FROM dbo.tblNewsCategories", objConn); objRdr = objCmd.ExecuteReader(); ddlCategory.DataSource = objRdr; ddlCategory.DataValueField = "CategoryID"; ddlCategory.DataTextField = "CategoryName"; ddlCategory.DataBind(); objRdr.Close(); objCmd = new OleDbCommand("SELECT * FROM dbo.tblSubCategories", objConn); objRdr = objCmd.Executereader(); ddlSubCategory.DataSource = objRdr; ddlSubCategory.DataValueField = "SubCategoryID"; ddlSubCategory.DataTextField = "SubCategoryName"; ddlSubCategory.DataBind(); objRdr.Close(); objConn.Close(); } }
</script>
<asp:Content ID="Content1" ContentPlaceHolderID="ContentPlaceHolder1" Runat="Server">
<table> <tr> <td align="right">Title:</td> <td align="left"><asp:TextBox ID="txtArticleTitle" CssClass="textbox" runat="server" /> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator1" ControlToValidate="txtArticleTitle" ErrorMessage="*" runat="server" /> <br /> </td>
<!--- <asp:CompareValidator ID="cvArticleTitle" ControlToValidate="txtArticleTitle" Operator="DataTypeCheck" Type="String" ErrorMessage="No numbers allowed" />---> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><p>Article Category:</td><td align="left"><asp:DropDownList ID="ddlCategory" CssClass="dropdownmenu" runat="server" /></td> </tr> <tr> <td align="right"><p>Article Sub Category:</td><td align="left"><asp:DropDownList ID="ddlSubCategory" runat="server" /></td> </tr> <tr><td align="right">News Article:</td><td align="left"><asp:TextBox ID="txtArticleDesc" CssClass="textbox" Columns="40" Rows="4" TextMode="MultiLine" runat="server" /> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="rfvArticleDesc" ControlToValidate="txtArticleDesc" ErrorMessage="*" runat="server" /> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr> <tr> <td> </td> </tr></table>
<asp:Button ID="btnSubmit" CssClass="button" runat="server" Text="Submit" /></asp:Content><asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="ContentPlaceHolder2" Runat="Server"></asp:Content>
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 13, 2006
Hi,
Just wondering if some one can help me out here I know that we can work with access2003 as a front end and SQL2000 as a back end. What I am trying to do now is working with SQL2005 as a back end I was wondering if it can be done ( I can access it but having errors creating tables etc).
Thanks
Sorry I was not sure where exactly to post this topic as it relates to both dbs so I have posted this same thread in Access as well.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2006
I'm not "cobol person" but now, I have to bind a cobol application (from mainframe) to query SQL 2005
Have somebody had this task?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2008
I have an SQL2005 db residing on a 64bit server.I can load and run my App, provided it is installed on the server.However when I try to run from a Client's PC I get timeout errors.
Initially the error was Remote connections not allowed,but I have overcome this by ensuring SQLbrowser was running and that AllClient and Server Prodtocols were enabled.
I now keep getting a message the timeout has expired.
Do I need to do more in a 64bit environment.
Please help !
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2008
hi
Did someone have the answer for this problem of SQL2005?
Event filter with query "select * from __InstanceModificationEvent within 10 where TargetInstance isa 'Win32_Service'" could not be (re)activated in namespace "//./root/Microsoft/SqlServer/ComputerManagement" because of error 0x80041010. Events may not be delivered through this filter until the problem is corrected.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2006
What solutions are available?
Is there a way to read about from server's metadata?
Gus
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2007
Hi All.
I have SQL2000 on my WinXP computer. Can I install SQL2005 on my desktop? If yes what version?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 26, 2007
Hi all,
I perform a export using sql2005 wizard to output the data from a table to a execl file and at the same time create a package.
The following error encounterd,anyone know what is the possible causes:
Operation stopped...
- Initializing Data Flow Task (Success)
- Initializing Connections (Success)
- Setting SQL Command (Success)
- Setting Source Connection (Success)
- Setting Destination Connection (Success)
- Validating (Success)
- Saving (Success)
- Prepare for Execute (Stopped)
- Pre-execute (Stopped)
- Executing (Error)
Messages
* Error 0xc001000e: New_test_export: The connection "DestinationConnectionOLEDB" is not found. This error is thrown by Connections collection when the specific connection element is not found.
(SQL Server Import and Export Wizard)
* Error 0xc001000e: New_test_export: The connection "DestinationConnectionOLEDB" is not found. This error is thrown by Connections collection when the specific connection element is not found.
(SQL Server Import and Export Wizard)
* Error 0xc00291eb: Drop table(s) SQL Task: Connection manager "DestinationConnectionOLEDB" does not exist.
(SQL Server Import and Export Wizard)
* Error 0xc0024107: Drop table(s) SQL Task: There were errors during task validation.
(SQL Server Import and Export Wizard)
- Copying to `COST_CENTER_V` (Stopped)
- Post-execute (Stopped)
- Cleanup (Stopped)
Thanks for help.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2007
is there a way to import/export diagrams in sql 2005?
thnaks i nadvance
peleg
Israel -the best place to live in aftr heaven 9but no one wan't to go there so fast -:)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2007
hi, on the MS site it states :
For Workgroup and Standard, each virtual or physical operating environment containing a running instance of SQL Server requires a Server license.
Does this mean if I have 1 server running 6 instances I would require 6 SQL Server licenses ?
thank you ,
jamie
View 3 Replies
View Related