SQLCeResultset, Connections And Performance

Sep 25, 2007

I am currently working with typed sqlceresultsets. I noticed that each resultset manages its own databaseconnection. I am considering to change this to a situation where I can reuse a databaseconnection on more than one sqlresultset.
Will this result in better performance? for example, when I have 2 updates for wicht I need 2 resultsets, wouldn't it be better to use 1 connection and transaction instead of each resultset creating/disposing its own? I would realy like to hear some oppinions. thanks!

View 4 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SqlCeResultSet Performance Vrs OLEDB

May 23, 2007

Hi I have written an Windows Mobile Application that insert 1000 records on SQL Compact 3.1 but I am having performance issues. If I use SqlCeResultSet and SqlCeUpdatableRecord in C# tha insert take 7 seconds to complete. But if I write a C++ application that uses OLEDB it takes only 4 seconds.



How can I improve the performance of the C# application? Also I would like to know if there is any possibility to use the same OLEDB objects that I use in C++ in a C# application.



Thanks a lot

View 4 Replies View Related

SQL Connections And Performance

Jul 24, 2005

How can I check/count how many connections are made during a requests, how many queries?, how long those queries took etc?

I want to know what's the approach to get this kind of information, so after that I can start working on improving performance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Managing Connections For Optimal Performance Question, Switch From Oracle To SQL

Feb 20, 2004

I was told in one of my systems classes that the real performance bottleneck in accessing information from the database was the opening of a connection from the application to the database.

To combat that problem I was advised to use a Singleton Factory pattern and to have that Factory instaniate a connection and open it, then pass references to that connection for all of the objects that it created. All of those objects passed the connection reference to the objects they created and so on. Basically that meant that I only ever had one connection open at any one time for my entire application. And I was able to implement this solution at my previous job where I was developing in Oracle. I primarially used OracleCommands and OracleDataReaders to get the informaton into and out of the database. I thought this was a very nice solution. Having this many DataReaders accessing a single connection was not a problem because OracleConnections don't get locked from having more than one DataReader open at once.

At my current job, however, I use SQL Server. I am concerned that the single connection will not work in my new enviroment as the SQLDataReaders lock up the connection while they are using it. If the information that I recieved about opening connections being the real bottleneck, then I am hesitant to have a connection instanciated and opened for each method, but I am concerned that a whole lot of errors will be generated if I use the single connection method. Also, how do DataAdapters effect my decision of which approach to use.

Any advice would be most helpful. If you have any questions that would help answer just ask. Thanks.

View 4 Replies View Related

SqlCeResultSet

Sep 13, 2007


How can i get the current row index of SqlCeResultSet specially after calling Seek method?

View 3 Replies View Related

SQLCeResultSet + Filter

May 17, 2007

Is there anyway to filter a existing SQLCEReusltSet?

View 1 Replies View Related

Paging On SqlCeResultSet

Aug 17, 2007

Hi

I am using SqlCeResult and i want to give paging on that and read in help that you can do paging on ResultSet so . I need code example so that i can understand how to implement this in resultSet.


Thanks & Regards
Vishal

View 4 Replies View Related

Insert Identity Value With SqlCeResultSet

Aug 20, 2007

Hi

I have a table with an identity column. This is set to increase by 1 and start on 1, and is the first column of the table.
When I insert a record into the resultset, I get an error stating that it can't be DbNull.
Th record is created from a resultset with the query "Select * from table", so the id should be included

But as I understand it, it should be increasing automatically, right? Becuase that's the behaviour of the normal sql Insert command. I have seen an article that just left the id column in the record alone before inserting it, but it didn't help me.
How can I sidestep this issue?

View 4 Replies View Related

Update Database Using Sqlceresultset

Aug 21, 2007

Hi,
I have an updateable sqlceresultset, which i use to bind to a datagrid. The user can modify values in the grid. I wish to update these values in the database only when the user has finished making these changes and clicks "Accept" button. But with the sqlceresultset, it looks like with every modification in the grid, the resultset is updated and change is written to the sdf database file . Please suggest how to work around this.

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

How To Update An SDF Database With A SqlCEResultSet

May 4, 2008

I have created my connection correctly
if (_deviceConn.State == ConnectionState.Closed)
_deviceConn.Open();

_deviceCMD = new SqlCeCommand("UPDATE metar SET observation='"+ Value1 +"',lastupdate='"+ Value2 +"',Valid_Time='"+ Value3+"' WHERE aerodrome_oaci_code='"+ FilterValue +"'", _deviceConn);

int RecordsAffected = _deviceCMD.ExecuteNonQuery();

The code executes fine, in fact the recordsaffected returns 1, but Nothing happend on database side. Another thing is, when i run the project on release mode, a copy of the SDF file is there, so, which of the sdf files the project is actually updating?, cause im querying both (the one in my project source path and the one copied to release folder) and both have the same data witout any modification.

My Copy to output directory setting is = Copy if newer.

If i try this with query analizer works just fine.

Any ideas?

View 1 Replies View Related

SqlCeResultSet - Problem After Deleting First Record

Oct 4, 2006



Hi,

I've noticed that after the first record from a ResultSet is deleted, HasRows property throws an exception like "The current row was deleted." Method ReadFirst() throws similar exception as well.

More details:

1. Create a ResultSet: ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.Updatable | ResultSetOptions.Scrollable | ResultSetOptions.Sensitive)

2. Let's say, there is no records in the resultset. Insert two new ones. Then call: ReadAbsolute(0); Delete(); HasRows; and the exception is thrown.

3. Then you can call ReadFirst() or Read with the same result.

4. Now call ReadAbsolute(0). It returns true. Call HasRows, ReadFirst() or Read() and you will get the exception each time.

I tried to explain this with the fact that Delete() doesn't change the current position of the ResultSet. But I don't see why that would mess the HasRows property or why after ReadAbsolute(0) retuns true, HasRows or ReadFirst() doesn't work.

Could anybody tell me what the problem is?

Thank you.

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL Mobile - SQLCEResultSet - Fast Retreival

May 23, 2007

Hi,



I am trying to develope a Pocket PC application using MS Visual Studio 2005 (C#)and the database is in the device (.sdf file).



Am trying to retreive a single row from a table containing around 10000 rows. I would like to know the fastest method to retreive the values.



whether it is faster to use an SQLDataAdapter to retreive the values to a dataset or datatable OR retreive the values to a SQLCEResultSet OR is there any other faster retreival method.



Please advice



Thanks,



Anujith



View 3 Replies View Related

SqlCeResultSet - Problem After Deleting First Record

Oct 3, 2006

Hi,

I've noticed that after the first record from a ResultSet is deleted, HasRows property throws an exception like "The current row was deleted."   Method ReadFirst() throws similar exception as well.

More details:

1. Create a ResultSet: ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.Updatable | ResultSetOptions.Scrollable | ResultSetOptions.Sensitive)

2. Let's say, there is no records in the resultset.  Insert two new ones.  Then call: ReadAbsolute(0); Delete(); HasRows; and the exception is thrown.

3. Then you can call ReadFirst() or Read with the same result.

4. Now call ReadAbsolute(0).  It returns true.  Call HasRows, ReadFirst() or Read() and you will get the exception each time.

I tried to explain this with the fact that Delete() doesn't change the current position of the ResultSet.  But I don't see why that would mess the HasRows property or why after ReadAbsolute(0) retuns true, HasRows or ReadFirst() doesn't work.

Could anybody tell me what the problem is?

Thank you.

 

View 1 Replies View Related

Update TextBox Binding To SQLCeResultSet

Jan 31, 2008

Hello,

I'm trying to develop a VB.NET (2005) form with just a ComBobox and a TextBox.

I bind a combobox with the SqlCeResultset (Scrollable | Updatable ). Do the same with the TextBox.
Combobox1.DataSource = rsResultSet
TextBox1.DataBindings.Add("Text", rsResultSet, "Obs")

This works (when I change the Combo item the textbox changes as well) but any changes to the textbox text do not reach the DB.If i change the Combobox item and back the old data is still there. If i look at the result
set it does appear as updateable.

How can I update the SqlCeResultset when I change the TextBox text?

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Obtain Sqlceresultset Table Schema With GetSchemaTable

May 4, 2006

I have a SqlCeResult pointing to a table :



Public conexion As Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection = New Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection("Data Source=iPAQ File StoreGestionAlmacenN.sdf")

Public ComandoCargaProductos As Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeCommand = conexion.CreateCommand

Public ResultSetProductos As Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeResultSet

Private Sub Form1_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles MyBase.Load

conexion.Open()

'**********************************************************

'************Conexion con Tabla Productos******************

'ComandoCargaProductos.CommandText = "SELECT * from [Productos]"

ComandoCargaProductos.CommandType = Data.CommandType.TableDirect

ComandoCargaProductos.IndexName = "PK__Productos__0000000000000041"

ComandoCargaProductos.CommandText = "Productos"

ResultSetProductos = ComandoCargaProductos.ExecuteResultSet(Data.SqlServerCe.ResultSetOptions.Scrollable Or Data.SqlServerCe.ResultSetOptions.Updatable)

End Sub

And I want to obtain the schema of the table which my resultset is pointing

Dim tabla As Data.DataTable

tabla = Me.ResultSetProductos.GetSchemaTable

But the datatable that i obtain donīt seem to have the schema that i need, for example donīt have the primary keys i have define and also donīt have any constrains......



Does anybody know the problem?



Thanks for your help

View 1 Replies View Related

SqlCeResultSet Looses Updatable Option If Query Has 2 Params

Feb 26, 2008

i have result set from such query :

resultSetOptions = System.Data.SqlServerCe.ResultSetOptions.Scrollable | System.Data.SqlServerCe.ResultSetOptions.Updatable;

queryText =
SELECT agvb_id as ID
,agvb_cat_id as Category
,agv_brn_id as Brand
,agvb_brn_name as BrandName
,agv_brn_area as Area
,agv_brn_sku_qty as SkuQuantity
,agv_brn_qty as Quantity
,agv_orderliness as Orderliness
,agvb_importance as Importance
FROM AGENTS_VISITS_BRANDS
WHERE (AGENTS_VISITS_BRANDS.agvb_agv_id = @agv_id)
AND (AGENTS_VISITS_BRANDS.agvb_cat_id = @dad_id)
ORDER BY agvb_brn_name

if i open resultSet with such qury it looses its updatable option.

If i remove from where 1 param (no mater which) everything runs ok.

View 1 Replies View Related

Unspecified Error When Inserting/updating Record Using SqlCeResultSet On Sql Compact

Nov 14, 2007

Hi,

Inside a single transaction I'm inserting/updating multiple records into multiple tables, in this order:
table 1 record 1
table 2 record 1
table 3 record 1
table 1 record 2
table 2 record 1
table 1 record 3
table 2 record 3
table 3 record 3


Now I'm getting an unspecified error on a certain table:

Unspecified error [ 3,-1300704038,-1834095882,activitypointerBase,x lock (x blocks),PAG (idx): 1078 ]


From msdn I see that:


PAG (idx) means a lock on an index page.

x lock means an exclusive lock:

Indicates a data modification, such as an insert, an update, or a deletion. Ensures that multiple updates cannot be made to the same resource at the same time. (I assume that multiple updates within the SAME transaction can be made, only multiple updates from different transaction cannot be made, right?)
I cannot find any reference to this error message and don't know what the numbers mean. Maybe it relates to data that can be found in the sys.lock_information table like explained here, http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms172932.aspx, but I'm not sure.

Furthermore, the sys.lock_information table is empty. I haven't been able to reproduce the problem myself. I only received an error log and the database to investigate it.

So, does anybody have an idea what this error message means and what I can do to troubleshoot this?

Thanks,
Jeffry

View 3 Replies View Related

BindingSource ListChanged Does Not Fire For New Records In SqlCeResultSet With Sensitive Option

Nov 6, 2007

I have an updateable and sensitive SqlCeResultSet that is bound to a DataGrid via a BindingSource. All updates to the resultset are programmatic. Changes to an existing record in the resultset are visible in the DataGrid and I am getting corresponding ListChanged events fired from the BindingSource. When I perform an database update independent of the resultset that changes resultset membership, I can peform a ReadLast and see the additional records; however the ListChanged event does not fire. Also, when I explicitly "create" a new record in the resultset I do not get a ListChanged event and in both cases the DataGrid does not display the records. Re-binding to the existing resultset does not appear to work either. Only when I create a new resultset and bind do the new or records display.
Using Compact Framework 2.0.

Any suggestions are appreciated.

View 3 Replies View Related

Need Help - Converting OLEDB Connections To SQL Connections In Asp.net

May 17, 2005

Hi there,
        Here we have got a
asp.net application that was developed when database was
sitting on SQL server 6.5. Now client has moved all of their databases
to SQL server 2000. When the database was on 6.5 the previous
development team has used oledb connections all over. As the databases
have been moved to SQL server 2000 now i am in process of changing the
database connection part. As part of the process i have a login
authorization code.
Private Function Authenticate(ByVal username As String, ByVal password As String, ByRef results As NorisSetupLib.AuthorizationResult) As Boolean
Dim conn As IDbConnection = GetConnection()
Try
Dim cmd As IDbCommand = conn.CreateCommand()
Dim sql As String = "EDSConfirmUpdate" '"EDSConfirmUpdate""PswdConfirmation"
'Dim cmd As SqlCommand = New SqlCommand("sql", conn)

cmd.CommandText = sql
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure
NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.AddParam(cmd, "@logon", username)
NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.AddParam(cmd, "@password", password)
conn.Open()
'Get string for return values
Dim ReturnValue As String = cmd.ExecuteScalar.ToString
'Split string into array
Dim Values() As String = ReturnValue.Split(";~".ToCharArray)
'If the return code is CONTINUE, all is well. Otherwise, collect the
'reason why the result failed and let the user know
If Values(0) = "CONTINUE" Then
Return True
Else
results.Result = Values(0)
'Make sure there is a message being returned
If Values.Length > 1 Then
results.Message = Values(2)
End If
Return False
End If
Catch ex As Exception
Throw ex
Finally
If (Not conn Is Nothing AndAlso conn.State = ConnectionState.Open) Then
conn.Close()
End If
End Try
End Function
''' -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
''' <summary>
''' Getting the Connection from the config file
''' </summary>
''' <returns>A connection object</returns>
''' <remarks>
''' This is the same for all of the data classes.
''' Reads a specific
connection string from the web.config file for the service, creates a
connection object and returns it as an IDbConnection.
''' </remarks>
''' -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Private Function GetConnection() As IDbConnection
'Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection
Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection
conn.ConnectionString = NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.GetConnectionString(NorisHelpers.DBHelpers.COMMON)
Return conn
End Function
in the above GetConnection() method i
have commented out the .net dataprovider for oledb and changed it to
.net dataprovider for SQLconnection. this function works fine. But in
the authenticate method above at the line
Dim ReturnValue As String = cmd.ExecuteScalar.ToString

for some reason its throwing the below error.
Run-time exception thrown : System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException - @password is not a parameter for procedure EDSConfirmUpdate.
If i comment out the
Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection
and uncomment the .net oledb provider,
Dim conn As IDbConnection = New System.Data.OleDb.OleDbConnection
then it works fine.
I also have changed the webconfig file as  below.
<!--<add
key="Common" value='User ID=**secret**;pwd=**secret**;Data
Source="ESMALLDB2K";Initial Catalog=cj_common;Auto
Translate=True;Persist Security Info=False;Provider="SQLOLEDB.1";'
/>-->
<add key="Common" value='User ID=**secret**;pwd=**secret**;Data Source="ESMALLDB2K";Initial Catalog=cj_common;' />
 
Please help. Thanks in advance.
 

View 4 Replies View Related

Keep A Few Connections Open All The Time Or Open/close Connections On The Fly?

Jul 20, 2005

Just a quick question about connection management. My application willnever need more than 1 or 2 connections about at any given time. Also, I donot expect many users to be connected at any given time. For efficiency, Iwould like to keep connections alive throughout the lifetime of the objectsrequiring them, rather than opening a new connection, executing code andthen closing it again. What is the most efficient way of doing this?Should I perform the open/close or just one open when I create the objectand a close when I dispose of it?

View 1 Replies View Related

[Performance Discussion] To Schedule A Time For Mssql Command, Which Way Would Be Faster And Get A Better Performance?

Sep 12, 2004

1. Use mssql server agent service to take the schedule
2. Use a .NET windows service with timers to call SqlClientConnection

above, which way would be faster and get a better performance?

View 2 Replies View Related

Extremely Poor Query Performance - Identical DBs Different Performance

Jun 23, 2006

Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server with aparticular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return 100rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query in singleuser mode. So I tested the query on the Development server by taking abackup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the dev server. I ranthe same query and found that it ran in less than a second.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue is relatedto some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc. Or couldit be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQL Serverconfiguations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating system related issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***

View 2 Replies View Related

Very Poor Performance - Identical DBs But Different Performance

Jun 22, 2006

Hello Everyone,I have a very complex performance issue with our production database.Here's the scenario. We have a production webserver server and adevelopment web server. Both are running SQL Server 2000.I encounted various performance issues with the production server witha particular query. It would take approximately 22 seconds to return100 rows, thats about 0.22 seconds per row. Note: I ran the query insingle user mode. So I tested the query on the Development server bytaking a backup (.dmp) of the database and moving it onto the devserver. I ran the same query and found that it ran in less than asecond.I took a look at the query execution plan and I found that they we'rethe exact same in both cases.Then I took a look at the various index's, and again I found nodifferences in the table indices.If both databases are identical, I'm assumeing that the issue isrelated to some external hardware issue like: disk space, memory etc.Or could it be OS software related issues, like service packs, SQLServer configuations etc.Here's what I've done to rule out some obvious hardware issues on theprod server:1. Moved all extraneous files to a secondary harddrive to free up spaceon the primary harddrive. There is 55gb's of free space on the disk.2. Applied SQL Server SP4 service packs3. Defragmented the primary harddrive4. Applied all Windows Server 2003 updatesHere is the prod servers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.67GHZTotal Physical Memory 2GB, Available Physical Memory 815MBWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1Here is the dev serers system specs:2x Intel Xeon 2.80GHz2GB DDR2-SDRAMWindows Server 2003 SE /w SP1I'm not sure what else to do, the query performance is an order ofmagnitude difference and I can't explain it. To me its is a hardware oroperating systemrelated issue.Any Ideas would help me greatly!Thanks,Brian T

View 2 Replies View Related

Some Ms SQL Connections

Dec 27, 2007

Hi I have some simple questions of for MS SQL. Say I have a database with a table Called Company. In this table I have Employee's with these columns(EmployeeID<PK>, FirstName, LastName) Now I am inserting some data like this.EmployeeID  FirstName, LastName------------------------------------------------------- 1                  Bob            Smith2                  Joe               Mitter Now Say I have this situation(this will look weird for this example but for another examples and the stuff I am working on it make sense). Say I have a new Employee Called Jessica White. Jessica must be the second record. So I need to insert it between the 1st and 2nd record. Like I said I am very noob at doing this stuff so I am not sure how I would do it. I first was going to my table and then went to modify. This brought up a blank grid with all my column names. I then started to add all my data in. I found out later to make my life easier I need to enter in certain spots null rows in it to help with formating(otherwise I would have had to figure out a way to do make null rows with c# code). I then went back to this grid and I tried to add a record before the data just like you if you used excel. I quickly found out you can not do that. This resulted me having to recreate the table and reput the all the data back in(this told me I was doing something very very wrong). I was then thinking of writing it with a query and I been playing around with it and still running into problems like say I had a table called test with a coloum called id<PK> and testss(yes bad names just playing around though).So if I did something like this:INSERT INTO testVALUES(2)INSERT INTO testVALUES(1)SELECT * FROM testNow I am trying to figure out how to insert something between rows 1 and 2. Would I have to drop the table or delete all the data and then run a saved copy of my script with the added change or what?My second question is what is a good site that has examples of all the commands(I don't want to read a book on it I have had a oracle sql course and well it was just boring and I did not learn too much.). I think the best way for me to learn is just continue doing my site and picking it up on the file and when I got a problem read about it and ask on the forums.   Thanks 

View 11 Replies View Related

SQL 7 Connections

Jul 13, 2001

Very strange event. Installed new machine into NT 4 network, which has a PDC and a BDC. We have copies of all SQL databases on both the PDC and the BDC. I installed SQL 7 on new workstation. Throught Control Panel/ODBC connections I can reach the SQL files on bith the PDC and BDC. Howver when I try to use Enterprise Manager, I can connect to the tables on the PDC, but not the BDC. SQL lists both machines in the server group, but only allows me to access tables on PDC! Here is the Event information that I recived on the BDC:

The computer IVR1 tried to connect to the server NTBACKUPSERVER using the trust relationship established by the MASSCOM domain. However, the computer lost the correct security identifier (SID) when the domain was reconfigured.

How do I fix this?

View 2 Replies View Related

Connections

Apr 14, 2000

HI all,
I have a problem here. I am having two computers both are loaded windows NT 4.0 AND SERVICE PACK 4 AND ALSO I INSTALLED SQL SERVER 7.0.
Now i want to connect those two servers , so pls anyone suggest me how i have to do.I connected both servers thru HUB.
Pls suggest me..
thank u..

--ram

View 1 Replies View Related

Connections

Oct 9, 1998

I figure anyone who has done VB and SQL Server might have run into this.
>
> I am set up as a DBO on SQL Server with access to db1 and db2. My default
> is set to db2. From my local machine, I can log through VB(DSN-less) in
> to
> either one without a problem. BUT, if I go to another machine and try to
> log in through VB(DSN-less) to db1, it rejects my login. Here is my
> connect
> string :
>
> UID=xxxxxxx;PWD=pedro;DATABASE=db2;DRIVER={SQL
> Server};SERVER=Athens;DSN=``;
>
> The only thing that changes when I log into db1 is the database parameter-
> "DATABASE=db1".
>
> Am I doing something wrong here? Is there something that needs to be
> setup
> differently in SQL Server? Do I need to put something else into the
> connect
> string?
>
> This happens for the other developers as well, not just me.
>
> Any help would be GREATLY appreciated.

View 2 Replies View Related

DTS Connections

Apr 12, 2001

I am looking for some ideas on the following DTS challenge: I need to import the data from an Access 97 database into a set of tables(about 25). The location of the database can be anywhere on the users drive(s) and I will need to get the location of the database from a registry setting and use it to define the connection.

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Too Many SQL Connections

Jun 11, 2004

We have a case where a user is using Excel sheet to connect the database on SQL2K and generally his connection runs in the upper 150 in numbers. He generally gets more than 150 connections open.

I know that it's not a good thing, but is there a way to limit it or even kill it after it reaches max?

What are the disadvantages of opening too many connections?

View 1 Replies View Related

Out Of Connections... Or Am I?

Sep 7, 2006

I'm getting the classic message "The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool" etc when connecting to my SQL Server 2005 Express from a .Net application.
Then I try connecting, simultaneously, from a simple ASP.net thing I wrote just for testing and this works fine. So, then the connection pool can't be full, can it? Or, does each application have its own pool??

View 6 Replies View Related

Max Connections?

Apr 16, 2004

Ok, yeah, I'm being lazy...

Any comments?

View 8 Replies View Related

Connections To SQL

Feb 9, 2006

Hi

I have heard that SQL Server can support upto 10,000 users,

What if my application , connects to the sql & does not do antything then , why does the SQL server slow down with just 700 users.

I mean just the connection is established & NOTHING further is done.


Thanks

View 6 Replies View Related

2 Connections

Nov 29, 2007

hi,

have been looking for ages for somewhere that might be able to answer my question so thought i'd try here.

anyhows, my place of work have goldmine 6.7 running on a server. the problem is that some of the client machines seem to be taking 2 connections to the server when logged into goldmine and some only 1.

when looking at the open sessions it shows a second for some users accessing pipesqlquery. all users show this but only some show it as a second connection.

please any ideas

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved