SQLserver (sqlsrvr.exe) Process Is Being Paged Out!
Jun 15, 2007
We are running SQL 2005 SP2 x64 on Windows 2003 SP2 X64.
Server specs:
Quad Core, each core runs at 2.33Ghz.
4GB memory
OS and SQL on RAID 1 set
Transaction log on RAID 1 set
Databases on RAID 5 set
-The SQL service account is a domain account with the "lock pages in memory" rights.
-The min memory use for sql server is 3000MBand the maximum is 2147483647MB.
For whatever reason, the sqlsrvr.exe process uses much less physical memory than the Virtual Memory (VM). When I look at the Task manager, I see 230MB for Mem Usage column and 300MB for VM size column under full workload. Why is the SQL server process being paged out? I have 3GB for it to use. Should I be concerned about the my SQL server?
I didn't configure the AWE as MS doesn't recomment using it on x64 bit systems. When I do "dbcc memorystatus", I get the following:
VM Reserved 4269536
VM Committed 196680
AWE Allocated 0
Reserved Memory 1024
Reserved Memory In Use 0
I thought granting "lock pages in memory" rights to the sql service account automatically enables AWE in x64 bit version of SQL 2005 standard server.
In SQL Server 2000, when i install a client connection only, it also install the enterprise manager, just by adding/register new SQL server. there you can access all the tables. but in SQL Server 2005 how can I achieve that? Coz when i only install the client tool for SQL Server 2005 it only enables to connect to database, not accessing it freely and sql server management studio not included.
I frequently see the following message on SQL Server log
2008-06-09 07:46:18.17 spid3s A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 0 seconds. Working set (KB): 1079156, committed (KB): 17156388, memory utilization: 6%.
What does it indicates and what appropriate action has to be taken to fix it.
The database runs on
SQL 2005 Dev 64-bit SP2 9.00.3042.00 Win 2003 standard x64 SP2 16GB RAM
I see the following message in SQL Server logs. What does this indicates. What should I do to avoid this.
2008-05-20 01:25:02.12 spid2s A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 0 seconds. Working set (KB): 33920, committed (KB): 15142988, memory utilization: 0%.
The server configuration is
SQL 2005 Dev edition SP2 64bit Win 2003 R2 SP2 Standard X64 editioin RAM size is 16GB
In my SQL Server Errorlog, I see the below error. The system has 8 GB of RAM with enough free RAM, something I can do to prevent this alert? (Note: I have no MIN/MAX memory set on this Instance)
A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 328 seconds. Working set (KB): 76896, committed (KB): 167628, memory utilization: 45%.
On a SQL Server 2005 x64 Standard Edition cluster I get the error listed below and then the SQL server service restarts. The SQL server is unavailable for 5-10 minutes during that time. Any ideas?
Error: A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation. Duration: 647 seconds. Working set (KB): 11907776, committed (KB): 28731732, memory utilization: 41%%.
Out techs informed me that they are getting reports of a system slow down. When they look, they find sqlserver.exe has lots of memory allocated to it. They reboot the server and then it runs okay for a few weeks. They tell me this just started happening recently.
SQLServer itself has not been touched in months. They are, however, starting to use one of the databases heavier.
I found a setting where you can set max_server_memory. Any problems if I set this to a value?
Has anyone ever seen a situation where SQLSRVR.EXE starts gobbling RAM when under load but does not seem to release it (as seen by mem usage under Task Manager or the related PerfMon counters?) I am running a test of 4 client applications that are hammering against the server but when I check the stats memory is consumed up to the maximum - when I halt the client applications and reduce the processing load to zero the usage stats still show the SQL engine as holding the memory.
I'm running a copy of SQL 7.0 EE on Win2K Advanced Server, using a Compaq 8500 w/ 750MB RAM.
Hello,i have a doubt here, after a close the connection, i still can see the last stored procedure active in the LOCKS/PROCESSID in enterprise manager of SQL SERVER.I think i'm closing the connection well Try If Me.ID > 0 Then Dim strSql As String = "SP_CHANGECLASSCONTENTS" Dim sqlcommand As New SqlCommand(strSql, New SqlConnection(ConnStr)) sqlcommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure sqlcommand.Parameters.Add("@PerformActivation", SqlDbType.Bit).Value = 0 sqlcommand.Parameters.Add("@PerformInactivation", SqlDbType.Bit).Value = 0 sqlcommand.Parameters.Add("@PerformDelete", SqlDbType.Bit).Value = 1 sqlcommand.Parameters.Add("@PerformUndelete", SqlDbType.Bit).Value = 0 sqlcommand.Parameters.Add("@PermanentDelete", SqlDbType.Bit).Value = CBit(PermanentDelete) sqlcommand.Parameters.Add("@Class_ID", SqlDbType.Int).Value = _id sqlcommand.Connection.Open() sqlcommand.ExecuteNonQuery() sqlcommand.Connection.Close() Else Err.Raise(10205, "CLASS", "CLASS ID is empty") End If Catch ex As Exception _err = ex.Message Return Err.Number End Try
I am running into a problem loggin into SQLsrver 7.0 using 'sa' account but works fine admin account(NT acct)
I have installed sqlsrvr 7.0 on win2k - server standard edition. Installed SQLserver using NT domain account. I have created a username 'sa' with admin previleges. When I try to login with sa, login fails in the enterprise manager. ?
I tried to re-install the server7.0 using local account, again unable to login with 'sa' account in the enterprise manager
Appreciate if you could shed some lights on this issue
Can anybody shed some light on my issue? I'm reviewing my client's event log and finding the repetitive warning "A significant part of sql server process memory has been paged out. This may result in a performance degradation." This has been an ongoing issue that I've searched high and low to try and resolve.
The system is Windows Server 2003 Standard x64 Edition - SQL Server 2005 SP2 - 2.33 GHz - 4 GB Ram
I have been searching this topic on and for quite some time and can't seem to find a decent answer. Is it feasible to do your paging strictly from a SQL query? Pass the query the pagesize, what page to return and what to sort by?
Is there a way, other than simply changing the format of the SRS report, to create an old fashond Paged style report - similar to the ones you can get from Crystal Reports?
What is the recommended mechanism for selecting paged results from SQL.
Presently I pass various params including the request Max Items Per Page and the requested page.
The I execute the query as a count with the search params.
Then comes the paging logic, which validates the page number against the request page and number of hits etc.
Then a temp table and record variables are created for the results.
Then I run the query again with a cursor and select the appropriate Items into the temp table based on the paging values (First Item and Last Item).
Then I return the temp table & some additional return params with the Total Hits etc.
The Stored procedure is accessed via an ADO.Net client and the system.data.IDBReader populates a .Net strongly typed collection and is for read only display.
I have a paging query that uses OpenQuery to access the MSIDXS indexing service and return records where text is matched. The query looks like this:
select top 25 * from OpenQuery(FileSystem, 'SELECT DocTitle, FileName, Rank, Size, Create from Scope() where contains(''report'') ORDER BY Rank DESC') as Q, LookupDocuments_dbv AS v where Q.FileName=v.Loc_cst and catname_cst='Main' and (v.docid_cin not in (select top 600 v.docid_cin from OpenQuery(FileSystem, 'SELECT DocTitle, FileName, Rank, Size, Create from Scope() where contains(''report'') ORDER BY Rank DESC') as Q, LookupDocuments_dbv AS v where Q.FileName=v.Loc_cst order by v.docid_cin)) order by v.docid_cin
Not the exact query, but it is just as slow as the query in my program. This query will retrieve the top 25 records starting at record 601 where 'report' is found in a document and where the category = 'Main'
What is really weird about this is that in management studio this query will sometimes return in like 3 seconds, while the exact same query will take 30 seconds using ASP.Net / System.Data.SqlClient (and I mean it actually sits on sqlCommand.ExecuteReader() for a long period of time). Also, does management studio cache the table randomly, because sometimes it'll take forever and other times it'll be fast.
I do not have response issues with this paging query in non-MSIDXS queries.. I can for example return the 5,000th - 5,025th of 50,000 records in less than a second while the OpenQuery manages to get progressively slower very quickly (like 3 extra seconds per page of 25 records, so it takes like 20 seconds to return 150-175 of 600).
I am trying to move my application (asp.net) from a non-paged select to a paged query.
I am having a problem. Below is my Stored Procedure. The first Query in the procedure works...the rest (which are commented out ALL work interactively, but fail when the program tries to access....The ONLY THING I change is the stored procedure I switch the comment lines to the non-paged procedure and it works, I try to use the any of the paged procedures and it fails with the same error (included below)
I can't see where any of the queries are returning different results. I have also included the program abort that happens, it is the same for all of the paged queries.
ALTER PROCEDURE dbo.puse_equipment_GetAllTypedEquipment ( @EquipmentTypeId int, @StartRowIndex int, @MaximumRows int ) AS
-- ************************************************************************************************ -- Non-Paged OUTPUT -- THIS WORKS!!!!! SET NOCOUNT ON SELECT Equipment.*, EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category FROM Equipment INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON EquipmentCategory.CategoryId = Equipment.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId = Equipment.EquipmentTypeId where Equipment.EquipmentTypeId = @EquipmentTypeId AND Equipment.IsDeleted = 0
/* -- ************************************************************************************************ -- Using a Temp Table --THIS WORKS INTERACTIVELY, But NOT When Called by the program SET NOCOUNT ON create table #PagedEquipment ( IndexId int IDENTITY(1,1) Not NULL, EquipId int )
-- Insert the rows from Equipment into the PagedEquipment table Insert INTO #PagedEquipment (EquipId) select EquipmentId From Equipment WHERE IsDeleted = 0
SELECT #PagedEquipment.IndexId, *,EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category FROM Equipment INNER JOIN #PagedEquipment with (nolock) on Equipment.EquipmentId = #PagedEquipment.EquipId INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON EquipmentCategory.CategoryId = Equipment.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId = Equipment.EquipmentTypeId Where #PagedEquipment.IndexId Between (@StartRowIndex) AND (@StartRowIndex + @MaximumRows +1) */
/* -- ********************************************************************************************** --Using the With to create a temp table (in memory)..works interactively but fails when --called by the application.. --THIS WORKS INTERACTIVELY, But NOT When Called by the program Set NOCOUNT ON; With PagedEquipment AS ( SELECT EquipmentId, ROW_NUMBER() OVER (Order by Equipment.EquipmentId) AS RowNumber FROM Equipment WHERE EquipmentTypeId = @EquipmentTypeId AND IsDeleted = 0 )
SELECT RowNumber, Equipment.*, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category, EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType FROM PagedEquipment INNER JOIN Equipment ON Equipment.EquipmentId = PagedEquipment.EquipmentId INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON Equipment.CategoryId = EquipmentCategory.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON Equipment.EquipmentTypeId = EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId WHERE PagedEquipment.RowNumber Between (@StartRowIndex+1) AND (@StartRowIndex+1+@MaximumRows) return -- ******************************************************************************************* */
/* -- ******************************************************************************************** --nested selects --THIS WORKS INTERACTIVELY, BUT NOT WHEN CALLED FROM THE PROGRAM SET NOCOUNT ON Select * From ( Select Row_Number() OVER (Order By Equipment.EquipmentId) as RowNumber, Equipment.*, EquipmentType.Name as EquipmentType, EquipmentCategory.Name as Category FROM Equipment INNER JOIN EquipmentCategory ON EquipmentCategory.CategoryId = Equipment.CategoryId INNER JOIN EquipmentType ON EquipmentType.EquipmentTypeId = Equipment.EquipmentTypeId where Equipment.EquipmentTypeId = @EquipmentTypeId AND Equipment.IsDeleted = 0 ) equip Where equip.RowNumber between (@StartRowIndex+1) AND (@StartRowIndex + 1 + @MaximumRows ) -- ************************************************************************************************ */
Server Error in '/pUse' Application. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int.
Source Error:
Line 148: { Line 149: List<EquipmentDetails> equipment = new List<EquipmentDetails>(); Line 150: while (reader.Read()) Line 151: equipment.Add(GetEquipmentFromReader(reader)); Line 152: return equipment;
Source File: c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeDALEquipmentEquipmentProvider.cs Line: 150
Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): Arithmetic overflow error converting expression to data type int.] System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +925466 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +800118 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +186 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +1932 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.HasMoreRows() +150 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.ReadInternal(Boolean setTimeout) +212 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDataReader.Read() +9 PredominantUse.DAL.Equipment.EquipmentProvider.GetEquipmentCollectionFromReader(IDataReader reader) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeDALEquipmentEquipmentProvider.cs:150 PredominantUse.DAL.Equipment.SqlClient.SqlEquipmentProvider.GetTypedEquipmentList(Int32 EquipmentTypeId, Int32 StartRowIndex, Int32 MaximumRows) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeDALEquipmentSqlClientSqlEquipmentProvider.cs:103 PredominantUse.BLL.Equipment.GetTypedEquipment(Int32 EquipmentTypeId, Int32 StartRowIndex, Int32 MaximumRows) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeBLLEquipmentEquipment.cs:259 PredominantUse.BLL.Equipment.GetTypedEquipment(Int32 EquipmentTypeId) in c:Documents and SettingsBrianDesktoppuseApp_CodeBLLEquipmentEquipment.cs:238
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.1433; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.1433
I have implemented the Stored Procedure "RowCount" method of controllingpaged recordsets in ASP as shown in this pagehttp://www.aspfaq.com/show.asp?id=2120.I have had to make heavy alterations to the code in order for it to workwith my application.It all worked fine until I tried to sort my data by a field which containeda NULL value (even in just one record). Before I added additional criteriafor the Unique_ID field the stored procedure returned zero records whensorting by such a field. I then added the Unique_ID criteria to the ORDER BYand WHERE clauses (as seen below) and it excludes records.In short obviously what I want this to do is order by fields that containNULL values (e.g. fld4 in sample data below). It currently pages and ordersperfectly in fields which have data in every row.If anyone reads this and helps me, thanks *very* much in advance.(P.S. sorry about the horrible state of my code but I've been messing withit trying to get this fixed for ages)(P.P.S the reason for passing in the long SQL string as a parameter in theSP is because the string is generated using complicated loops and I foundthis much easier in ASP than doing it in SQL)******************************************Here is an example of a call to the procedure from ASP:EXEC st_paging_rowcount 7, 1, 50, 'SET ROWCOUNT 50 SELECT utbl7.*,utbl6_1.fld1 AS fld3_Name FROM utbl7 LEFT OUTER JOIN utbl6 utbl6_1 ONutbl7.fld3 = utbl6_1.Unique_ID WHERE utbl7.fld5 >= @fld1val ORutbl7.Unique_ID >= @uniqueid ORDER BY utbl7.fld5',5******************************************Here is the SQL SP:CREATE PROCEDURE st_paging_rowcount@tableid INT,@pagenum INT = 1,@perpage INT = 50,@finalselect NVARCHAR(1500),@sortfield INTASBEGINSET NOCOUNT ONDECLARE@ubound INT,@lbound INT,@pages INT,@rows INT,@querystring1 NVARCHAR(200),@querystring2 NVARCHAR(200),@querystring3 NVARCHAR(200)SELECT @querystring1 = N'SELECT @rows = COUNT(*),@pages = COUNT(*) / @perpageFROM utbl' + CAST(@tableid AS NVARCHAR(15)) + ' WITH (NOLOCK)'--SELECT GOGOGO = @querystring1EXEC sp_executesql@querystring1,N'@rows INT OUTPUT, @pages INT OUTPUT, @perpage INT',@rows OUTPUT, @pages OUTPUT, @perpageIF @rows % @perpage != 0 SET @pages = @pages + 1IF @pagenum < 1 SET @pagenum = 1IF @pagenum > @pages SET @pagenum = @pagesSET @ubound = @perpage * @pagenumSET @lbound = @ubound - (@perpage - 1)SELECTCurrentPage = @pagenum,TotalPages = @pages,TotalRows = @rows-- this method determines the string values-- for the first desired row, then sets the-- rowcount to get it, plus the next n rowsDECLARE @fld1val NVARCHAR(64)DECLARE @uniqueid INTSELECT @querystring2 = N'SET ROWCOUNT ' + CAST(@lbound AS NVARCHAR(15))+ 'SELECT@fld1val = fld' + CAST(@sortfield AS NVARCHAR(15)) + ', @uniqueid= Unique_IDFROMutbl' + CAST(@tableid AS NVARCHAR(15)) + ' WITH (NOLOCK)ORDER BYfld' + CAST(@sortfield AS NVARCHAR(15)) +', Unique_ID 'SELECT test0 = @querystring2EXEC sp_executesql@querystring2,N'@fld1val NVARCHAR(64) OUTPUT, @uniqueid INT OUTPUT',@fld1val OUTPUT, @uniqueid OUTPUT--SELECT test = @finalselectEXEC sp_executesql@finalselect,N'@fld1val NVARCHAR(64), @uniqueid INT',@fld1val, @uniqueidSET ROWCOUNT 0END*********************************************Here is some sample data from the table (e.g. would like to sort by fld4):Unique_ID Date_Added Who_Added Locked fld1fld2 fld3 fld4----------- --------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------------------------------------------------------3 2005-09-16 16:12:30.200 1 0 SmithJohn 1 NULL4 2005-09-16 16:12:41.013 1 0 JonesChris 1 NULL6 2005-09-16 16:13:10.187 1 0 StamovStilian 1 NULL7 2005-09-16 16:19:15.437 1 0 LewickiSteve 1 Colchester8 2005-09-16 16:19:36.937 1 0 JamesPhil 1 NULL9 2005-09-16 16:20:35.327 1 0 LeroyDidier 1 NULL
Hi, I am trying to implement filtering on a custome paged stored Procedure, here is my curent Stored Procedure which doesn't error on complie or run but returns no records. Anyone got any ideas on how to make this work???<Stored Procedure>set ANSI_NULLS ONset QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ONgo-- =============================================-- Author: Peter Annandale-- Create date: 22/10/2006-- Description: Get Filtered Names-- =============================================ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[proc_NAMEFilterPaged] -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here @startRowIndex int, @maximumRows int, @columnName varchar(20), @filterValue varchar(20)ASBEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. SET NOCOUNT ON;SELECT CODE, LAST_NAME, Name, TYPE, NUMBER FROM (SELECT n.CODE, n.LAST_NAME, n.FIRST_NAME + ' ' + n.MIDDLE_NAME AS Name, nt.TYPE, f.NUMBER, ROW_NUMBER() OVER(ORDER BY n.LAST_NAME) as RowNum FROM dbo.NAME n LEFT OUTER JOIN NAMETYPE nt ON n.NAME_TYPE = nt.NAME_TYPE LEFT OUTER JOIN FUNERAL f ON n.CODE = f.DECEASED WHERE @columnName LIKE @filterValue ) as NameInfo WHERE RowNum BETWEEN @startRowIndex AND (@startRowIndex + @maximumRows) -1END </Stored Procedure> Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.. Regards..Peter.
I was trying to extract data from the source server using OLEDB Source and SQL Server Destination when i encountered this error:
"Transaction (Process ID 135) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been chosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction.".
What must be done so that even if the table being queried is locked, i wouldn't experience any deadlock?
Hello all, I am running into an interesting scenario on my desktop. I'm running developer edition on Windows XP Professional (9.00.3042.00 SP2 Developer Edition). OS is autopatched via corporate policy and I saw some patches go in last week. This machine is also a hand-me-down so I don't have a clean install of the databases on the machine but I am local admin.
So, starting last week after a forced remote reboot (also a policy) I noticed a few of the databases didn't start back up. I chalked it up to the hard shutdown and went along my merry way. Friday however I know I shut my machine down nicely and this morning when I booted up, I was in the same state I was last Wenesday. 7 of the 18 databases on my machine came up with
FCB:pen: Operating system error 32(The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.) occurred while creating or opening file 'C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataTest.mdf'. Diagnose and correct the operating system error, and retry the operation. and it also logs FCB:pen failed: Could not open file C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLDataTest.mdf for file number 1. OS error: 32(The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.).
I've caught references to the auto close feature being a possible culprit, no dice as the databases in question are set to False. Recovery mode varies on the databases from Simple to Full. If I cycle the SQL Server service, whatever transient issue it was having with those files is gone. As much as I'd love to disable the virus scanner, network security would not be amused. The data and log files appear to have the same permissions as unaffected database files. Nothing's set to read only or archive as I've caught on other forums as possible gremlins. I have sufficient disk space and the databases are set for unrestricted growth.
Any thoughts on what I could look at? If it was everything coming up in RECOVERY_PENDING it's make more sense to me than a hit or miss type of thing I'm experiencing now.
Dear list Im designing a package that uses Microsofts preplog.exe to prepare web log files to be imported into SQL Server
What Im trying to do is convert this cmd that works into an execute process task D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad>preplog ex.log > out.log the above dos cmd works 100%
However when I use the Execute Process Task I get this error [Execute Process Task] Error: In Executing "D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoadpreplog.exe" "" at "D:SSIS ProcessPrepweblogProcessLoad", The process exit code was "-1" while the expected was "0".
There are two package varaibles User::gsPreplogInput = ex.log User::gsPreplogOutput = out.log
How do I use the execute process task? I am trying to unzip the file using the freeware PZUnzip.exe and I tried to place the entire command in a batch file and specified the working directory as the location of the batch file, but the task fails with the error:
SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" starting.
Error: 0xC0029151 at Unzip download file, Execute Process Task: In Executing "C:ETLPOSDataIngramWeeklyUnzip.bat" "" at "C:ETLPOSDataIngramWeekly", The process exit code was "1" while the expected was "0".
Then I tried to specify the exe directly in the Executable property and the agruments as the location of the zip file and the directory to unzip the files in, but this time it fails with the following message:
SSIS package "IngramWeeklyPOS.dtsx" starting.
Error: 0xC002F304 at Unzip download file, Execute Process Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "%1 is not a valid Win32 application".
The command in the batch file when run from the command line works perfectly and unzips the file, so there is absolutely no problem with the command, I believe it is just the set up of the variables on the execute process task editor under Process. Any input on resolving this will be much appreciated.
I am designing a utility which will keep two similar databases in sync. In other words, copying the new data from db1 to db2 and updating the old data from db1 to db2.
For this I am making use of the 'Tablediff' utility which when provided with server name, database, table info will generate .sql file which can be used to keep the target table in sync with the source table.
I am using the Execute Process Task and the process parameters I am providing are:
The customer.bat file will have the following code: tablediff -sourceserver "LV-SQL5" -sourcedatabase "TC_CTI" -sourcetable "CUSTOMER_1" -destinationserver "LV-SQL2" -destinationdatabase "TC_CTI" -destinationtable "CUSTOMER" -f "c:SQL_bat_Filessql5TC_CTIsql_filescustomer1"
the .sql file will be generated at: C:SQL_bat_Filessql5TC_CTIsql_filescustomer1.
The Problem: The Execute Process Task is working fine, ie., the tables are being compared correctly and the .SQL file is being generated as desired. But the task as such is reporting faliure with the following error :
[Execute Process Task] Error: In Executing "C:SQL_bat_FilesSQL5TC_CTIpackage_occurrence.bat" "" at "C:Program Files (x86)Microsoft SQL Server90COM", The process exit code was "2" while the expected was "0". ]
Some of you may suggest to just set the ForceExecutionResult = Success (infact this is what I am doing now just to get the program working), but, this is not what I desire.
I'm pulling data from Oracle db and load into MS-SQL 2008.For my data type checks during the data load process, what are options to ensure that the data being processed wouldn't fail. such that I can verify first in-hand with the target type of data and then if its valid format load it into destination table else mark it with error flag and push into errors table... All this at the row level.One way I can think of is to load into a staging table then get the source & destination table -column data types, compare them and proceed.
should I just try loading the data directly and if it fails try trouble shooting(which could be a difficult task as I wouldn't know what caused error...)
I am having this table locking issue that I need to start paying attention to as its getting more frequent.
The problem is that the data in the tables is live finance data that needs to be changed and viewed almost real time so what I have picked up so far is that using 'table Hints' may not be a good idea.
I have a guy at work telling me that introducing a data access layer is the only way to solve this, I am not convinced but havnt enough knowledge to back my own feeling up. (asp system not .net).
Hi, I'm trying to upload the ASPNETDB.MDF file to a hosting server via FTP, and everytime when it was uploaded half way(40% or 50%) I would get an error message saying: "550 ASPNETDB.MDF: The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process" and then the upload failed. I'm using SQL Express. Does anybody know what's the cause? Thanks a lot
Hi. When I try to start a package manually clicking the Start Debugging button I get this after a little while:
Cannot process request because the process (3880) has exited. (Microsoft.DataTransformationServices.VsIntegration)
How can I prevent this from happening? This happens every time I want to start the package and every time the process id is different. Here it is 3880.
Hi, I have a web form that lets users search for people in my database they wish to contact. The database returns a paged set of results using a CTE, Top X, and Row_number(). I would like to give my users to option of removing individual people from this list but cannot find a way to do this. I have tried creating a session variable with a comma delimited list of ID's that I pass to my sproc and use in a NOT IN() statement. But I keep getting a "Input string was not in a correct format." Error Message. Is there any way to do this? I am still new to stored procedures so any advice would be helpful. Thanks
I have had a full lock on my sql server and I have a few logs to found the origin of the lock.
I know the process at the head of the lock is the 55 process.
Here are the information I have on this process: Spid 55 55 ecid 5 5 Ecid 0 0 ObjId 0 1784601646 IndId 0 0 Type DB PAG Resource 1:1976242 Mode S IS Status TransID GRANT GRANT TransID 0 16980 TransUOW 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000
lastwaittype PAGEIOLATCH_SH CMD AWAITING COMMAND Physycal id 1059 Login time 2007-07-05 04:29:53.873 nat address DFF06EBF974D Wait type 0x0046 HostName . BlkBy . DBName grpprddb CPUTime 54331 DiskIO 1059 ProgramName
Would someone know a way to identify the origin of the process 55?
I have already tried to execute the following request: select * from SYSOBJECTS where id=1784601646
I have a File System Task Copy file operation to copy a file in an SSIS package. The package when scheduled as a job fails with the following error:
The process cannot access the file 'C:ETLConsignmentAppleAppleRawFile.txt' because it is being used by another process.".
However when I right click on the package and execute it manually from the Integration Services it runs successfully without any problem. I am not certain on how to resolve this issue any inputs will be much appreciated.
Error: 0xC002F304 at Rename file 1, File System Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.".
When running two File System Tasks after each other, with the same file, the file is still locked when running the second task. Resulting in an error: 0xC002F304 at Rename file 1, File System Task: An error occurred with the following error message: "The process cannot access the file because it is being used by another process.".
I found a workaround by addind a Execute Process Task before the second File System Task that pings to the localhost. This results in a 5 second delay, but there must be a better solution. Anyone?
