SQLservr.exe Taking Over Computer
Aug 25, 2004
I have been dealing with an intermittent problem for several months that manifests itself on my computer as well as a customers computer. It is happening so often, upon booting the computer, that I just open and then minimize the Task Manager so that it will be in the Tool Tray and the bargraph will be visible.
From time to time the processor bargraph will "Max out" and when I open Task Manager and click on CPU in the Processes Tab, SQLServr.exe is using 99% of the CPU.
In Enterprise Manager I have set maximum Memory to 25% of the available system memory. I have tried this in both Fixed mode as well as Dynamic mode, no change.
I was told that there was a SQL Server version that was susceptible to a WORM that caused this. I have since upgraded to SQL ver. 8.0.194. I'm not sure of the version that I replaced, but I thought that the previous version was the one that was susceptible to the worm.
Has anyone fought this battle and if so can you offer any experience or advice?
Thanks very much for your help,
Doc
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 1, 2005
hi
when my site is being used, sqlservr.exe is using 100% of CPU..
why this happening ?
please help me..
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2004
hello,
We are having an issue with tempdb growth and even after restarting the server and the shrinkfile command the tempdb still holds on to nearly 15 GB of space.
I found this article on the microsoft website which recommended that we stop SQL server and retart it from the commad prompt using the sqlservr -c -f command. After this we go to SQL Analyzer and run the shrinkfile.
I gave the sqlservr command on a friday evening in our test enviroment and I come back on monday morning and it is still not completed and i had to close the window and start SQL Server from Windows.
Is there something that i am missing here that i should know about the sqlservr command. Is there anything else that someone could recommend regarding shrinking the tempdb.
thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 7, 2008
Happy new year and merry xmas to everyone
I got SQL 2005 Express edition with Sharepoint Server 2007 installed and its running 100% CPU all the time
there are plenty threads like this out there but none have an answer
anyone got ideas?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2002
SQL 7.0(SP3) on NT Server(SP5)
The sqlservr.exe process is using almost 800MB of memory in Task Manager. We have 1GB physical RAM. The swapfile is on C: with min=950/max=1050MB. Is this normal? I think there may be some kind of memory leak. Any ideas?? Please HELP!
Rob
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2000
Help ! My sqlservr service is running at 100% and my server is dog slow. I don see anything unusual when looking at current activity or sp_who2. I have restarted it a few times.. ANy suggestions? I only have one database in production on this server and there are only about 10 users hitting it..
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2005
Arghhh, login to sqlserver and issue this query:
Code:
SELECT @@VERSION
and tell us what comes out.
Seev here for reference.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Feb 25, 2000
Hello all,
Can I know somedetail about why the Sqlservr.exe app increasing in size drastically. Even I check all parameter of the server and I check the process running on server.
I feel server is not releasing the queues and It is occupying the memory. I any one suggest what could be the cause ?
Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2008
Hi all,
I have a problem with sqlservr.exe (version 2005). It use alot of memory. I check on taskbar manager sqlservr.exe usage (CPU 10 - 20%, Mem usage - 1,493,688/2GB Ram). I dont know how can I fix it. Some body could help me please.
Thanks
Doan Jung
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2008
Hi all,
I have a problem with sqlservr.exe (version 2005). It use alot of memory. I check on taskbar manager sqlservr.exe usage (CPU 10 - 20%, Mem usage - 1,493,688/2GB Ram). I dont know how can I fix it. Some body could help me please.
Thanks
Doan Jung
View 14 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
Hi,
I have asked this question on the MSDN forums
with no response as yet. Maybe you guys can
shed some light on this:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2826915&SiteID=1
We have an apparent File Handle leak occurring in our SQL server.
Last weekend the server ran out of non-paged pool space:
Event ID 2019 -The server was unable to allocate from the system
nonpaged pool because the pool was empty.
In the process monitor the sqlservr.exe process had Mem Usage
of 503,528KB and a handle count of 3,306,263 (!). Using poolmon
the highest usage of the non-paged pool was for the Muta tag, with
211,610,768 Bytes. Restarting the sql service fixes this
temporarily, but already we are back to 427,000 handles for
sqlservr.exe and climbing steadily at about 200,000 handles
per day.
Is there a fix for this?
Cheers,
Geoff
PS
We have:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3054.00 (Intel X86)
Mar 23 2007 16:28:52
Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition
on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2)
(Meaning Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2 :-) )
View 20 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2006
Hello All,On all of my SQL servers (2000 with SP3), when I go to task manager andlook at memory usage, sqlservr.exe is always at 1.7gigs. If I reducethe maximum to let's say 1 gig it will go down to 1 gig. But if it iseven at 2gigs or 3 gigs it will be showing 1.7 gigs. Why? Is is ok toreduce the memory usage of sqlservr.exe?Raziq.*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2004
Thanks a lot
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2002
I've a SQL 7 SP3 server that was running for more than 6 months without any problem and hence I never give much thought to it other than the monitoring the growth of the database size.
Just the other day, I was pretty shocked to see that SQLSERVR.EXE was using nearly 1 GB of RAM (and I have 1 GB of physical RAM)!!! My database size is only about 2 GB and there aren't many simultaneous users online. This database is used for a web application.
Today I have the opportunity to restart the SQLServer service (to apply the security hotfix). And I'm pretty dismay to see its memory usage climbing steadily at the rate of around 20 to 30 KB every few seconds. I guess it'd hit 1 GB in a matter of hours or days..
Now, I've a similar server on another machine.. but its SQLSERVR.EXE is only using around 20 MB and it doesnt grow much.
So..what should I do?? Ideas? Suggestions? Thanks!!
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2000
Why does my Sqlservr.exe file take up 200 megs of my nt memory. When i control alt delete and go into task manager, sqlservr.exe is always at the top of the memory usage list.
Melissa
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 20, 2007
Can someone please explain what exit code 259 means as it appears in the debug output below?
When running a C# Stored Procedure within the VS 2005 IDE I receive the following Debug Output:
Auto-attach to process '[1152] [SQL] enterprise' on machine 'enterprise' succeeded.
Debugging script from project script file.
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x150) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x1314) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x1314) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_32mscorlib2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089mscorlib.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'c:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLBinnSqlAccess.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_32System.Data2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.Data.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_32System.Transactions2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.Transactions.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Security2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3aSystem.Security.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
Auto-attach to process '[1152] sqlservr.exe' on machine 'enterprise' succeeded.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Xml2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.Xml.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'SQL2005_Test', No symbols loaded.
'ENTERPRISE;.Net SqlClient Data Provider;4400' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Configuration2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3aSystem.Configuration.dll', No symbols loaded.
CurrencyCode Name ModifiedDate
------------ -------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
eee MyCurr4 3/20/2007 12:58:38 PM
(1 row(s) affected)
(1 row(s) returned)
Finished running sp_executesql.
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x1314) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program '[1152] [SQL] enterprise: enterprisesqlexpress' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program '[1152] sqlservr.exe: Managed' has exited with code 259 (0x103).
I would also appreciate hearing back from users as to why I only have two choices in my VS 2005 IDE Output window (Build and Debug). From what I've read, 'Database' should be another choice for 'Show output from:'.
My environment consists of the following:
Database:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86) Feb 9 2007 22:47:07 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Express Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
I have verified the SQL Server connection has 'Allow SQL/CLR Debugging' enabled.
The Visual Studio 2005 IDE is:
8.0.50727.762 (SP.050727-7600)
Running Microsoft .Net Framework version 2.0.50727
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 3, 2007
Dear Friends,
I have developed my web application using ASP.Net with MS SQL SERVER Express Edition SP2 .
I have hosting it at some where which i can remote and see the service of sqlservr.exe .
The first start of this service take the memory space just only 25 MB but after this service run upto one week it increased up to 200MB .This service won't realease from the memory untill unless i restart the server or restart its service.
1.Could any one tell me why this service continue increasingly ?.
2.What can i configure in MS SQL SERVER 2005 EXPRESS Edition to let this release from the memory without restart the server or its service ?.
Best Regards,
Channarith Hun.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2006
I keep getting different answers from different people on regarding if you can or cannot kill the hosting sql server process with an unsafe assembly. Can you do this? If so could you please attach a sample demonstrating this?
Thanks,
Derek
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 3, 2006
Why is the PasswordRecovery control creating another sqlservr process after I successfully enter the user name, and for a reason I have not found yet it keeps the database in a read only modem then when I answer my security question correctly it gives me the error:
Failed to update database "C:INETPUBWWWROOTVER1.0.0.1APP_DATAASPNETDB.MDF" because the database is read-only.
I read other post regarding the read only message and I don't if there doing the same thing, but why does this happen and what is the solution to this other not using the control?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2007
Hello everyone,
I have my minimum server memory in SQL set to 4GB, but in my Windows Task Manager, sqlservr.exe only has about 100MB.
Does anyone have any idea why task manager doesn't show the full amount?
Thanks in advance.
Jarret
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2007
Hello,
I'm havin a problem with my database server in the network, i'm running a windows 2003 server standard edition with sql server 2005 standard edition.
the problem is that the server get stock and the performance of the whole network is affected, when i use the tak manager to monitor the performance i can see that the sqlservr.exe proccess is using 1,397,928 k of memory usage, in the performance monitor the graphics get crazy and the cpu usage grows up untill 85%.
Can you please let me know if there is something that i can do to normalize the server performance in order to let the network user work with the applications feeded by this server.
Thanks in advance for your help.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2008
Hi i have installed sql server 2000 on xp window and facing error of connection failed, check sql server registration what it mean pleas guide me.
webmaster http://www.GlobalGuideLine.com
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2008
Hi,
I've SQL Server 2005 Dev Edition and Windows Server 2003 ENT SP2.
in the task manager i see that the server use 5GB out of 6GB,but when i arrange the process to see whom takes all the memory i see that the sqlservr.exe takes 150MB(he is the biggest).
when i open Perfmon and look on the sqlservr.exe memory use, i see that he takes the 4.5G.
i've a problem that the server use alot of cpu time to run users queries,i see that pages/sec counter is very big average between 600-800.
is there any problem with my memory?
why the memory reading from the task manager is wrong?
if my pages/sec counter is so big do i have a memory leaks + pressure?
THX
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I'm taking 70-228 this Saturday.Any advice from anyone who has taken it recently?Thanks in advance,Joe in Florida
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2007
just as we export in db2 database
as db2move databasename export -u username -p password
how we will export in sql server
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2008
Hello.
I have a query that takes 1,5second to execute, but only 150ms of CPU. The query is quite simple, just one where statement against a clustered index.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 156 ms, elapsed time = 1595 ms.
SELECT column1, column3, column4, ..., column10 FROM table WHERE column2 IN (37, 41, 43, 45, 49, 53, 55) ORDER BY column3 DESC
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=37 OR [u].[searchparamid]=41 OR [u].[searchparamid]=43 OR [u].[searchparamid]=45 OR [u].[searchparamid]=49 OR [u].[searchparamid]=53 OR [u].[searchparamid]=55 OR [u].[searchparamid]=59) ORDERED FORWARD)
I have tried to rewrite the query to an INNER JOIN instead.
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Nested Loops(Inner Join, OUTER REFERENCES:([spal].[number]))
|--Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__search_parameters_lookup].[IX___search_parameters_lookup] AS [spal]), SEEK:([spal].[hash]=-1726604993) ORDERED FORWARD)
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=[spal].[number]) ORDERED FORWARD)
but the query still takes 1,5 seconds.
It spends 59% (according to execution plan) of sorting. 14% for the index seek of the __search_parameters_lookup table and then 24% of a clustered index seek of the __searchtest table.
How come it only uses that small of CPU but it still takes 1,5 seconds? It seems to be reading from memory as well so it shouldnt be an IO-problem?
The index I have on the table is a clustered index on (column 2).
Any ideas of how I can improve this? I have tried with DTA, also with a non clustered index on column3.
If I remove some columns from the SELECT-list the query will execute alot faster:
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 32 ms, elapsed time = 32 ms.
Booth the CPU and the elapsed time goes down and now appears to be more normal.
So there seems to be a problem caused by data transfer.
I tried to do a remake and normalize the table and when I do that I get the query execute with a speed of 400ms CPU and 400ms total. And this is still the exact same result, so why does it only spend 400ms of "rendering" or fetching the data when the tables are normalized but 1500ms when its denormalized?
Any ideas?
I am running Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2006
I'm performing an insert and I not only need to remove the << character, but also need to take one field and dump it into two fields. So in essence -
KAREL>>MONTES
needs to look like
Col1 Col2
Karel Montes
Thanks :)
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2006
I have a custom .net application that uses SQL 2000 server. All users are compaining performance issues and white-outs while they are using the application. I am almost certain that it's the SQL server that is the curprit. All the other components involved in the application hardly has any CPU or memory usage when I check the performance in the task manager.
On SQL server, I see that the process sqlserver.exe is taking like 2.8GB of memory. Is there a way to find out which exact SQL query or process is taking so much of memory? I belive there may be a bad SQL process that is stuck and taking all the memory? Is there a way to find out?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2008
Hello.
I have a query that takes 1,5second to execute, but only 150ms of CPU. The query is quite simple, just one where statement against a clustered index.
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 156 ms, elapsed time = 1595 ms.
Code Snippet
SELECT column1, column3, column4, ..., column10 FROM table WHERE column2 IN (37, 41, 43, 45, 49, 53, 55) ORDER BY column3 DESC
Code Snippet
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=37 OR [u].[searchparamid]=41 OR [u].[searchparamid]=43 OR [u].[searchparamid]=45 OR [u].[searchparamid]=49 OR [u].[searchparamid]=53 OR [u].[searchparamid]=55 OR [u].[searchparamid]=59) ORDERED FORWARD)
I have tried to rewrite the query to an INNER JOIN instead.
Code Snippet
|--Sort(TOP 1000, ORDER BY:([u].[LastActivityDate] DESC))
|--Nested Loops(Inner Join, OUTER REFERENCES:([spal].[number]))
|--Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__search_parameters_lookup].[IX___search_parameters_lookup] AS [spal]), SEEK:([spal].[hash]=-1726604993) ORDERED FORWARD)
|--Clustered Index Seek(OBJECT:([MP].[dbo].[__searchtest].[cix___searchtest_] AS [u]), SEEK:([u].[searchparamid]=[spal].[number]) ORDERED FORWARD)
but the query still takes 1,5 seconds.
It spends 59% (according to execution plan) of sorting. 14% for the index seek of the __search_parameters_lookup table and then 24% of a clustered index seek of the __searchtest table.
How come it only uses that small of CPU but it still takes 1,5 seconds? It seems to be reading from memory as well so it shouldnt be an IO-problem?
The index I have on the table is a clustered index on (column 2).
Any ideas of how I can improve this? I have tried with DTA, also with a non clustered index on column3.
If I remove some columns from the SELECT-list the query will execute alot faster:
SQL Server Execution Times:
CPU time = 32 ms, elapsed time = 32 ms.
Booth the CPU and the elapsed time goes down and now appears to be more normal.
So there seems to be a problem caused by data transfer.
I tried to do a remake and normalize the table and when I do that I get the query execute with a speed of 400ms CPU and 400ms total. And this is still the exact same result, so why does it only spend 400ms of "rendering" or fetching the data when the tables are normalized but 1500ms when its denormalized?
Any ideas?
I am running Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2006
HI allI want to take a back of my serverthere is 40 data base into my server and i have to take back of every database every day is there any way which can take back up of hole server at one time.regard
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 2, 2007
I dont know what this is called in the technical world. But you know when you do a search on amazon or play.com and the search results contain the first sentance or so of the items describtion rather than the whole thing. How is this done? thanks si!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2006
I have the below query which returns thousands of records. can I optimize the returned result set faster without changing the structure of the database?
SELECT dbo.tblComponent.ComponentID, dbo.tblComponent.ComponentName, dbo.tblErrorLog.ShortErrorMessage, dbo.tblErrorLog.LongErrorMessage, dbo.tblErrorLog.LogDate, dbo.tblErrorLevel.Description,dbo.tblErrorLog.ErrorLogIDFROM dbo.tblErrorLevel INNER JOIN dbo.tblErrorLog ON dbo.tblErrorLevel.ErrorLevelID = dbo.tblErrorLog.ErrorLevelID INNER JOIN dbo.tblComponent ON dbo.tblErrorLog.ComponentID = dbo.tblComponent.ComponentID
Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 11, 2002
I have a VB application which uses SQL server as the database and uses Crystal reports for reporting.We are using a stored procedure to create a report and we pass ID from the vb side to run the stored procedure.
In boston the report shows up in 4 sec.But in california it takes 7 min.
We have a very good network(T3).Why it is taking more time in california ?.
Any ideas ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
