SUM(x) OVER (PARTITION BY Y) Supported?
Mar 7, 2008SUM(qtycolumn) OVER (PARTITION BY columnA, Column B)
is this function supported by Sql Ce?
SUM(qtycolumn) OVER (PARTITION BY columnA, Column B)
is this function supported by Sql Ce?
SQL2K5
SP1
Howdy all. I'm trying to open up Dedicated Admins Connection in Management Studio and getting "DAC's are not supported. (Object Explorer)"
Any idea's?
TIA, cfr
i have a table named table1 sitting on a a partittion scheme px.
table1 is partitioned on u_id by tens,
first partion u_id=0 to 9
second partion u_id=10 to 19
third partion u_id=20 to 29
ans so on and so forth
i have a table named table2 with
records having u_id = 13 to 16
obviously belonging to the second partion.
i want to load table2 to table1 as fast as i could with
the following requirements:
all contents of partition 2 of table1 must be deleted before loading
table2 ceases to exist after the operation
how will i do that.
thanks.
Hi All,
Can someone take a look at my code and tell me what i'm doing in wrong. The script runs fine but when i go to table property it says the table is not partitioned. Thanks for your help.
create database [mypartition]
go
--CREATE FILEGROUP
USE [mypartition]
GO
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2000_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2001_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2002_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2003_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2004_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2005_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2006_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2007_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2008_filegroup
ALTER DATABASE mypartition ADD FILEGROUP Y2009_filegroup
--CREATE FILES
USE mypartition
GO
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2000,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2000.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2000_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2001,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2001.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2001_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2002,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatamdetail_2002.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2002_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2003,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2003.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2003_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2004,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2004.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2004_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2005,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2005.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2005_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2006,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2006.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2006_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2007,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2007.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2007_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2008,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2008.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2008_filegroup;
ALTER DATABASE mypartition
ADD FILE
(NAME = mypartition_detail_2009,
FILENAME = 'F:ss_datadatadetail_2009.ndf',
SIZE = 2MB)
TO FILEGROUP Y2009_filegroup;
--CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION
USE [mypartition]
GO
CREATE partition FUNCTION detail_part_function (varchar(10)) AS
RANGE LEFT FOR VALUES('2001','2002','2003','2004','2005','2006','2007','2008')
GO
--CREATE PARTITION SCHEME
USE [mypartition]
GO
CREATE PARTITION SCHEME detail_part_scheme AS
PARTITION detail_part_function TO
(Y2000_filegroup, Y2001_filegroup,Y2002_filegroup,Y2003_filegroup,Y2004_filegroup,Y2005_filegroup,Y2006_filegroup,Y2007_filegroup,Y2008_filegroup,Y2009_filegroup)
GO
-- Now just create a table that uses the particion scheme
USE [mypartition]
GO
/****** Object: Table [dbo].[partitioned_table] Script Date: 05/14/2008 09:44:21 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[partitioned_table](
[id] [int] NOT NULL,
[fiscal_year] [varchar](10) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NULL,
CONSTRAINT [PK_partitioned_table] PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
(
[id] ASC
)WITH (IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON detail_part_scheme(fiscal_year)
GO
SET ANSI_PADDING OFF
I can see lot of documentation on Range Partitioning. Is there any other type of partition supported in SQL Server 2005?
For example, I have a Fact table having Billion rows. It has a column called BATCH_ID. A BATCH_ID corresponds to 10-20 Million rows and it is a running sequence number like 1,2,3 etc. (not an identity column). Is there anyway I can specify a partition function with BATCH_ID column as an int value? Will the SQL Server automatically does the partition on each int value in that case? If not, what is the best way to do it?
Thanks in advance for all help in this
Hi,
I have created the below procedure in SQL SERVER 2005.
But when I copy out the same in SQL SERVER 2000. I get an error at the underlined place. It says
Line 32: Incorrect syntax near '('.
ALTER procedure [dbo].[VTELcardvalidation1]
@CardValue1 int,
@CardValue2 int,
@CardValue3 int,@Result nvarchar(50)output
as
begin
declare @CrdPinNo varchar(100)
declare @CrdNo nvarchar(100)declare @count int
declare @inc int
declare @concat nvarchar(200)create table #temptable(crno nvarchar(50),pno nvarchar(50))
--First Card
--Change here
select @count=count(cardno) from vendorcardvalidation where cardvalue=1500 and flag=0if (@count)>@CardValue1
begin
declare cur1 cursor forselect top(@CardValue1) pin,cardno from vendorcardvalidation where cardvalue=1500 and flag=0 order by cardno
open cur1fetch next from cur1 into @CrdPinNo,@CrdNo
while(@@fetch_status=0)
beginupdate vendorcardvalidation set flag=1 where cardno=@CrdNo
insert into #temptable values(1500,@CrdPinNo)fetch next from cur1 into @CrdPinNo,@CrdNo
endclose cur1
deallocate cur1
set @Result='Success'end
else
begin
set @Result='Failure'
end
select * from #temptable
drop table #temptable
end
It seems the the word 'top' will not be supported in sqlserver 2000. What should I do?
Regards
cmrhema
I have the following VB function. The stored proc that is being called
("GetList") inside the function does a simple SQL Select statement against
an SQL Server 7 database using OLE DB. I'd like to store the result of the
SQL Select statement in the "Rs" parameter to pass back to the calling
function. Whenever I call this function, I get an error message stating "No
Such Interface Supported". Does anyone know why I cannot do this?
Also, this function is being called from ASP code. That's why the "Rs" is
passed as a variant. It's created in the ASP code before this function is
called.
------------------------------------------
Function GetAddressDropDownList(Rs As Variant, CustomerId As Long)
Dim ProcComm
Dim Parameter
Set ProcComm = CreateObject("ADODB.Command")
ProcComm.CommandType = adCmdStoredProc
ProcComm.CommandText = "GetList"
Set Parameter = ProcComm.CreateParameter("CustomerId", adInteger,
adParamInput)
Parameter.Value = CustomerId
ProcComm.Parameters.Append Parameter
Set Parameter = Nothing
ProcComm.ActiveConnection = BuildConnectionString()
Rs.CursorLocation = adUseClient
Rs.Open ProcComm, , adOpenForwardOnly
Set Parameter = Nothing
Set ProcComm = Nothing
End Function
How many "applications" can be loaded onto Microsoft SQL Server 6.5?
Additional Information:
The OS platform is Windows NT Server 4.0 (SP5) on a Compaq ProLiant 1600 (PII 450) with 256Mb RAM
Proposed applications, although this probably will mean little, are Dataview (club membership) Peterborough (payroll) and Positive (HR).
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks
Robert
robert@whiteley.com
Hello All,
I need to know if SQL 2000 32 bit is supported on a Windows 2003 64 bit on a x86 processor server. The server is clustered.
Does the Compact edition support the MARS feature (multiple active result sets) of SQL Server 2005?
View 3 Replies View Related
I am viewing a list of the reserved keywords for CE 3.5 and OPENXML is listed. Can you please tell me how I would implement this in CE 3.5? Since only one SQL statement can be sent with a SqlCeCommand then how can you prepare the document, access the xml data with OPENXML, and then close the document handle all in one call? For example, I have the following TSQL code in a SQL Express stored procedure and need to port it over to CE 3.5. Could you please help with some great ideas on how to go about this porting task?
CREATE PROCEDURE [SaveConfigurationMiscs]
(@XmlData Text)
AS
SET NOCOUNT ON
DECLARE @iDoc Int
/* Create an internal representation of the XML document. */
EXEC sp_xml_preparedocument @iDoc OUTPUT, @XmlData
/* Dump XML Data into an in memory table */
DECLARE @ConfigurationMiscs TABLE (
ConfigurationMiscID Int,
ActiveLaunchMonitor NVarChar(50),
UseModeledShots Bit,
DeleteRecord Int
)
INSERT INTO @ConfigurationMiscs (ConfigurationMiscID, ActiveLaunchMonitor, UseModeledShots, DeleteRecord)
SELECT X.ConfigurationMiscID, X.ActiveLaunchMonitor, X.UseModeledShots, X.DeleteRecord
FROM OPENXML (@iDoc, '/xml/ConfigurationMisc')
WITH (
ConfigurationMiscID Int,
ActiveLaunchMonitor NVarChar(50),
UseModeledShots Bit,
DeleteRecord Int
) X
/* Clean up XML resources */
EXEC sp_xml_removedocument @iDoc
/* Update */
UPDATE Table_ConfigurationMiscs
SET
Table_ConfigurationMiscs.ActiveLaunchMonitor = X.ActiveLaunchMonitor,
Table_ConfigurationMiscs.UseModeledShots = X.UseModeledShots
FROM ConfigurationMiscs Table_ConfigurationMiscs
INNER JOIN
@ConfigurationMiscs X ON Table_ConfigurationMiscs.ConfigurationMiscID = X.ConfigurationMiscID
WHERE
X.ActiveLaunchMonitor IS NOT NULL AND
X.UseModeledShots IS NOT NULL
/* Insert New */
INSERT INTO ConfigurationMiscs (ConfigurationMiscID, ActiveLaunchMonitor, UseModeledShots)
SELECT X.ConfigurationMiscID, X.ActiveLaunchMonitor, X.UseModeledShots
FROM @ConfigurationMiscs X
LEFT JOIN
ConfigurationMiscs Table_ConfigurationMiscs ON Table_ConfigurationMiscs.ConfigurationMiscID = X.ConfigurationMiscID
WHERE
Table_ConfigurationMiscs.ConfigurationMiscID IS NULL AND
X.ActiveLaunchMonitor IS NOT NULL AND
X.UseModeledShots IS NOT NULL
/* Delete Old */
DELETE Table_ConfigurationMiscs
FROM ConfigurationMiscs Table_ConfigurationMiscs
INNER JOIN
@ConfigurationMiscs X ON Table_ConfigurationMiscs.ConfigurationMiscID = X.ConfigurationMiscID
WHERE
X.ConfigurationMiscID IS NOT NULL AND
X.DeleteRecord IS NOT NULL
RETURN
GO
Is there a _complete_ known good list of OS support for sql express 2005? Is is going to install on vista home basic, etc.?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHaving sucessfully tested mirroring, I've suggested we should implement it at my place of work.
However, they are non too pleased that it is not yet officialy part of SQL Server 2005 and therefore not supported, does anyone know when it will be in standard edition? because I really really need to know...
Thanks
Hi,
I recently installed MSSQL 2000 and sp3a onto a windows 2003 server in a test lab. I configured one big c: partion on this os and installed the db in the default location.
I need to detach the db's on this server and re-attach them onto another MSSQL 2000/sp3a server running 2003 os with a partition scheme like this:
c: = 20 gigs for the os
e: = 600 gigs for the data
I could not re-attach the db's onto the e:default path odatabase
Is there a work-around for this? This makes sense to me as to why it is not working and was an install oversight on my part but there has to be a way to overcome this delima?
Thanks in advance,
damnit
Hi
Please help me how to do the Horizontal table partition??
I have to split the table in to multiple sub tables with same columns and less rows and then I have to use each sub table.
Thanks you in advance....
Regards
LakshmiPK
Hi everybody
Does anyone know where I can find code to PROCESS a Partition using DSO.
Thank a lot.
I keep getting this error:
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 12
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'over'.
What am I missing? The max() over statement looks just like the statement in the documentation.
select RegistrationId,
OrderId,
Sequence,
Title,
InformalFirstName,
FirstName,
MiddleName,
Lastname,
EntryDate,
max(Sequence) over(partition by RegistrationId) as 'maxsequence'
from registration
where OrderId = '68379449583' and
Year = '2008' and
Active = 'Yes'
I have a situation where my SQL works everywhere else but my COBOL compiler complains wherever I use PARTITION BY. I can't find a workaround for that problem so I would like to remove all the PARTITION BYs. I'm not confident that I can do this accurately and would like some help getting started.
Here is my simplest example:
SELECT FESOR.REGION, FESOR.TYPE,
COUNT(*) OVER (PARTITION BY FESOR.REGION, FESOR.TYPE)
FROM FESOR, FR
where FESOR.phase = 'Ref'
and FESOR.assign is null
and FESOR.comp_date is null
and FESOR.region = FR.REGION
and FESOR.type = FR.TYPE
and FR.REP_ROW='A'
GROUP BY FESOR.REGION, FESOR.TYPE
What I'm looking for is a modified version of the SQL above which returns the same result set without using PARTITION BY.
Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Hi,
I am using SQL Server 2000 SP3 Version 8.00.7.60. Can I create instances of SQL server 2000 even if it's already installed?
Thanks for your help in advance!
Guys,
I have names in the database which I want partition by last name - for example last names starting with A, B, C, D should go to the file group 1. last names starting with E, F, G, H should go to file group 2.
I am trying to use the following function - but do I specify in the function that last names with with A, B, C, D should go to the file group 1
CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION myRangePF3 (char(20))
AS RANGE RIGHT FOR VALUES ('EX', 'RXE', 'XR');
Is there any way to modify partition function to accomplish this?
Any suggestions and inputs would help
Thanks
All,
I have a partitioned table (1.7 billion rows) that is across 97 partions. The table is partitioned on datetime field.
When I query only this table with datetime field in where clause I see that cleary it outperforms the unpartitioned table.
When this table is joined to 3 tables it performs no better than
the non-partitioned table... it seems that the query does a partition scan.
The part. table has a 3 part composite clustered index and
a NC index on the partion field value.
Would appreciate any feedback.
thanks
HI all,
I am in the progress of migrating my 2000 install over to SQL05 and onto a couple of new boxes. I have 2 Dell 1850's to set up mirroring on and wanted to know your opinion on the best partition setup. The 1850's are a 2 disk machine so it has to be a RAID 1 setup. I am just unsure of the benefit of partitioning the logical drive to seperate the log files from the data files.
Should I partition the drive, a 300G SCSI into 2 partitions and keep the logs on one partition and the data on another? Can anyone tell me if there is a benefit to doing this?
If there is a more pratical solution can you explain?
Thanks in advance!
Jason
Sydney Australia
Most examples for SQL Server 2005 involve a sales table that you split based on date, i.e. sales records prior to 2000 go to this partition, and the ones after that go to another one. Nice and simple.
Say I have a sales table:
id Amount Date
1 10 1/1/1999
2 9.99 1/1/2007
Now then, I put all the records prior to 2000 in it's own partition.
So when I do something like this: SELECT * FROM Sales WHERE DATE = 1/1/1999
the SQL server will know which partition to look at. Very nice.
Now then, if I do this: SELECT * FROM Sales WHERE id = 1
How will the SQL server know which partition to look at?
Thank You!
hi list
i have a table named stgBudgetFact, that is partitioned on DivisionID.
each DivisionID goes into its own partition, which is on its own file group.
the etl guru on the project wants to be able to truncate the partition, not do a delete from the table based on DivisionID.
Is it possible to truncate the partition somehow (remove rows where DivisionID = 3 for instance without ALTER DATABASE, where the medicine is worse than the disease) and then reestablish the partition so we can restart a failed load by division?
i really hope something like this is possible
thanks
drew
hello,
I want to copy all or part data in one partition to another partition,how can I do?
Dear all,
Sorry if my post misplaced. I have a table that contain huge data so I made a partition function and partition schema. Unfortunately there's only one column to be allowed as a partition column whereas my queries using a few columns. Can we make many partition function that apply to one partition schema ? I search no result in SQL BOL.
Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Hery
Hi Every body,
I am creating Table partition in tables but i am getting this error can you anybody plz help how can we do table partition in the database
CREATE TABLE PartitionTable (col1 int, col2 char(10))
ON myRangePS2 (col1) ;
GO
CREATE TABLE NonPartitionTable (col1 int, col2 char(10))
ON test2fg1 ;
GO
ALTER TABLE PartitionTable SWITCH PARTITION 2 TO NonPartitionTable ;
GO
Msg 1921, Level 16, State 1, Line 2
Invalid partition scheme 'myRangePS2' specified.
Msg 1921, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Invalid filegroup 'test2fg1' specified.
Msg 4902, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot find the object "PartitionTable" because it does not exist or you do not have permissions.
Does anyone know how much free space should be left available on a storage partition to allow for the optimum performance? In fact is there any performance benefit to allowing a certain amount of free space on a partition that is occupied by SQL data files?
How complex can the over (partition by...) window functions be? All the examples I see in BoL, the partition clause is the same for each window function. Can it be different? How different?
Here are some snippets of where I'd like to take this. Right now I'm using successive views to bring the results to a single row.
SUM(building_function_table.e_and_g_square_foot + building_function_table.auxillary_square_foot)
OVER (PARTITION BY building_function_table.fice_code, building_function_table.building_number) AS sqft
SUM(building_function_table.e_and_g_square_foot * function_table.square_foot_value)
OVER (PARTITION BY building_function_table.fice_code, building_function_table.building_number,building_function_table.function_code) AS repl_value_e_g
SUM(building_needs_table.percentage * (building_needs_table.age / system_component_table.useful_life) * component_multiplier_table.multiplier)
OVER (PARTITION BY building_needs_table.fice_code, building_needs_table.building_number, building_needs_table.system_code, building_needs_table.system_component_code, building_needs_table.function_code) as maint_needs
And it gets even more complex, but these are all I've written because I don't know if it will work.
These would be all part of a giant overhead view of a building maintenance database. It's normalized and the respective tables above are all simple inner joins on the primary key of their parent.
Hello there.
I'm developing an eCommerce solutions based on the ASP.NET 2.0 Commerce Starter Kit, architechture. It uses the Provider Pattern. In my web-application, i use the CatalogProvider, to retrieve data from a SQL Server 2005 database. I call the methods through a handler class, whoch excists inside the WebApp. I also use a ShoppingCartProvider, OrdersProvider, ShippingProvider etc. in the same way.
In my Web.Config file, i have all the provers listed, and on each provider, the name of the connectionString to use are given.
My connection string looks like this:"connString" connectionString="Server=xxxx;Database=xxxx;Trusted_Connection=True;" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" />
The problem is, that suddently, when browsing the website, that connects to the database through the providers, i get this error:
Keyword not supported: ',server'.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.ArgumentException: Keyword not supported: ',server'.Source Error:
Line 31: public static IDataReader GetProductsByCategory(int categoryID)
Line 32: {
Line 33: return Commerce.Providers.CatalogProvider.Instance.GetProductsByCategory(categoryID);
Line 34: }
Line 35:
Source File: d:DevelopmentASPNETSeoShopApp_CodeHandlersCatalogManager.cs Line: 33 Stack Trace:
If i then go back to my web.config file, and removes the providerName section, of the connectionString, the website works again, for a short period. When the error return, i undo the deletion of the providerName, and it will work again... For a short time...
I've also tried to use another connectionsString, like this:Data Source=Aron1;Initial Catalog=pubs;Integrated Security=SSPI
But then the keyword which is not supported is: ', data source'
Does anyone know what the issue might be?
Thanks in advance...
hi,i am trying to connect sql server 2005 from my asp.net applicationi have create DSN for this ..then i am getting the following errorKeyword not supported: 'dsn'. in sql serverplease provide me the solution
View 5 Replies View Relatedy am i having keywork not supported? is there anything wrong with my connection string ??
==========web config================
<appSettings>
<add key="db" value="icms" />
<add key="db_user" value="sqladmin" />
<add key="db_server" value="server" />
<add key="db_pwd" value="12345" />
<add key="session_timeout" value="600" />
</appSettings>
==========DB.vb==============
Dim myDB As New SqlConnection
Dim myCMD As New SqlCommand
Public Sub New()
Dim db_server = AppSettings("db_server")
Dim db = AppSettings("db")
Dim db_user = AppSettings("db_user")
Dim db_pwd = AppSettings("db_pwd")
Dim DBConnection As String = "DRIVER={SQL Server};" & _
"SERVER=" & db_server & ";" & _
"DATABASE=" & db & ";" & _
"UID=" & db_user & ";" & _
"PWD=" & db_pwd & ";" & _
"OPTION=3;"
myDB.ConnectionString = DBConnection
myCMD.Connection = myDB
End Sub
=============================
Hello community!
Short question:
how can i retrieve all code pages that MSSQL server is installed with?
Thank you in advance for your help.