Same Sql Server Instance, 2 Different DB: Messages Are Inserted Into Initiator's Sys.transmission_queue?
Jun 7, 2007
Hello,
I have a question..
I set-up my Service Broker comunication on the same SQL Server Instance beetween 2 different DBs.
One DB behave as Initiator and send messages to the SB service setup in the other DB.
I execute the SEND statement from the Initiator and if I count the messages on the sys.transmission_queue before to commit the transaction the count returns 0.
If I try to send a message not compliant with the message type, the count that runs after the SEND returns 1 - far enought.
I'm confused about the first behaviour because from what I understood the Acknolodgment and the removal of the message from the sys.trasmission queue should happen after the COMMIT.
Scenario: (1) Initiator/Target are running on different machines; (2) Target is on SQL Standard Edition with service pack 1; (3) Initiator ends the conversation.
If Initiator is running on SQL Express Edition with service pack 1 or 2, €śSend message€? and €śEnd conversion€? will introduce two messages in initiator€™s sys.transmission_queue. One is empty message with correct message type; the other is empty message with no message type. Both of them are from the Target to the Initiator.
If Initiator is running on SQL Standard Edition with service pack 1, with same stored procedure (attached below), there is no message left in initiator€™s sys.transmission_queue.
We like to find the way to make Initiator on SQL Express Edition acting same as it on SQL Standard Edition, namely not left messages in the initiator€™s sys.transmission_queue
CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[CreateMessageForQueue] @message varchar(max) AS BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @handle UNIQUEIDENTIFIER;
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @handle FROM SERVICE [TCP://Initiator:4321] TO SERVICE N'TCP://Target:4567' ON CONTRACT LogContract WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @handle MESSAGE TYPE LogMessage(@message);
We are having a problem with messages getting out of transmission_queue and into the queues themselves. The queues all are actviated and enabled, and our service broker is enabled at the database level. The dba detached & reattached the db yesterday, which I believe may be the cause of this problem. Everything seems to be in order (sp ownership, activation procs, etc), except when I run:
select [name], count(*)
from sys.dm_broker_queue_monitors qm
inner join sys.service_queues sq on qm.queue_id = sq.object_id
group by [name]
I get 2 entries for each queue. And the last_activated_time is the same date as the detach event. When we reattached we had to do an alter database set enable_broker in order to get it back up and running. When I run the above query on our dev and test environments, I get only one entry per queue.
Does anyone know why this would happen? Is this a valid state for SB? And to get past it, if we can't figure out the real fix for it, we want to get a copy of all the messages in the transmission queue, do an alter database set new_broker, then replay them all into SB. We hope this fixes the root cause, but it's a guess.
At my company, we're trying to use service broker to create a client-server system where there is a head office machine and multiple outlets registered with that head office. My problem is that sometimes when a branch sends a message to the head office, it just seems to sit in the transmission queue and never gets sent. If I run a script that forcibly ends the conversations on the client machine (with cleanup), storing the message bodies and then resend them, they seem to get through fine.
The way that we send messages is by calling a t-sql stored procedure from a c# application using SqlCommand (don't know if this should make any difference).
If I monitor the Head Office machine and one of the Outlets while this is happening, on the HO I get three events in a row:
Broker: Message Classify (1 - Local) Audit Broker Conversation (2 - No Certificate) Broker: Message Undeliverable (1 - Sequenced Message) The TextData contained in the third event is: This message could not be delivered because the security context could not be retrieved.
The RoleName of the server is Initiator, and the TargetUserName is the name of the service on the Outlet.
On the Outlet I get the following event repeatedly (presumably as it continues to try sending the message) - Broker: Remote Message Acknowledgement (1 - Message With Acknowledgement Sent).
On the client the RoleName also appears to be Initiator, and the TargetUserName is blank.
This would make me suspect that certificates were missing or something, except that if I remove messages from the queue and resend them they seem to get through, and also I've checked both databases and they have the correct certificates.
Sorry for the stupid question, but I can't seem to figure it out...
There are 119 messages that are stuck in the transmission queue, all for the same queue. When I check the status of the queue (via sys.service_queues), is_receive_enabled = 1, is_activation_enabled = 1, and max_readers = 3. When I check to see if there is an active queue monitor (via sys.dm_broker_queue_monitors) there is nobody watching this queue. What would cause this queue to be active, enabled but have nobody montioring it? Is there something internal that went wrong that made these (outbound) messages get stuck in the transmission queue, and is not showing up in the views? How can I get these messages "un-stuck" and flow through the system?
A problem I am seeing is the return message to this queue (to signify the target has consumed the message, and to end the conversation) are not being consumed, thus getting stuck in the "DI" state.
For some reason the messages are stuck at sys.transmission_queue. The transmission status seems to be null. I verified all the Queues and they hae the values of (is_receive_enables = 1, is_enqueue_enabled = 1, is_activation_enabled = 0)
I have set up the service broker on different domain and have bidirectional ports open to receive messages.
I can send and receive messages, when I run the same service broker setup scripts at the machines that belongs to same domain .
I may have a misunderstanding of how SB works, but this seems like a problem.
If a queue is disable (i.e. status = off) and a message is sent to the queue the message is placed on the sys.transmission_queue. Once the queue is enabled I thought the messages were sent to the queue in the order they were placed on the sys.tranmission_queue? I have been troubleshooting a problem and this is not the case. Do I have a misunderstanding of how the sys.transmission_queue works?
I've got 2 service broker databases on remote servers. I've created my endpoints, my routes and have everything set up. But when i send a test message, the messages set in the transmission_queue. There is no transmission_status. And when i look in at the sys.conversation_endpoints view I see that the conversation status is conversing. One odd thing I wanted to point out though is that the far_broker_instance column of the sys.conversation_enpoints view is null. When i run a trace on both databases, I see activity on the Initiator with things like Started_OutBound and conversing but I don't see any messages such as acknowledgment or any errors. On the Targer side I see no activity at all. Does anyone know what the deal is. Why don't I get some kind of error message. Why are all my messages staying in the transmission_queue?
I am trying to send messages between 2 different server instances. I am getting the following errors in Profiler:
"This message could not be delivered because the user with ID 0 in database ID 14 does not have permission to send to the service. Service name: 'TestService1'."
"The target service name could not be found. Ensure that the service name is specified correctly and/or the routing information has been supplied."
The scripts for object creation and messaging is following at the first server instance:
USE master GO CREATE ENDPOINT SBroker STATE = STARTED AS TCP ( LISTENER_PORT = 1212 ) FOR SERVICE_BROKER ( ENCRYPTION = DISABLED ); GO
USE Test GO CREATE QUEUE TestQueue WITH STATUS=ON
CREATE SERVICE TestService AUTHORIZATION dbo ON QUEUE TestQueue
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @dh FROM SERVICE [TestService] TO SERVICE 'TestService1','2B7CE76A-9804-46F3-9AE8-0AE59313613A' ON CONTRACT [DEFAULT] WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @dh MESSAGE TYPE [DEFAULT] ('this is message1');
DECLARE @status nvarchar(1024); SELECT status = GET_TRANSMISSION_STATUS(@dh);
END CONVERSATION @dh;
on second server instance:
use master GO CREATE ENDPOINT SBroker2 STATE = STARTED AS TCP ( LISTENER_PORT = 1212 ) FOR SERVICE_BROKER ( ENCRYPTION = DISABLED ); GO
in first server, in sys.transmission_queue transmission_status is empty
Both servers in the same domain, and databases on this server has the same owner.
on both servers, select @@version: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.2047.00 (Intel X86) Apr 14 2006 01:12:25 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Developer Edition on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 1)
Hello all, I have Microsoft iSCSI Initiator (SAN) installed on a SQL Server machine and has this drive acting as a local drive. All the database's data files are residing on this drive, attached with SAN. It runs as a service "Microsoft iSCSI Initiator" on the SQL Server machine.
Now the question is, when we restart the SQL Server all the databases change their status to "Suspect" and we have to stop all the sqlserver services (all the SQL instances) and start them all up. This is the only temporary solution we came up with. Could any one has any real solution or had encounter such a problem before?
Is there any sample code to demo the SSB send messages with same sql instance?
my case is very simple:
I want write a stored procedure to send a xml to another database. The stored procedure is called by tables triggers when some data is changed under the specific conditions.
The box I am trying to connect to is running two instances of SQL Server. There is a SQL Server 2005 instance which is the default. There is a SQL Server 2000 instance which is named 'SQLSERVER'. I can connect to the SQL Server 2000 instance no problem:<add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPCSQLSERVER;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" /> However, I am having trouble connecting to the Default SQL Server 2005 instance. I have tried: <add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPC;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" /> but it doesn't work. I have tried explicitly setting SQL Server 2005 to use port 1434 (as SQL Server 2000 is running on port 1433), and then used: <add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPC,1434;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" /> but this doesn't work either.
Am I mssing something here? Any help much appreciated Thanks...
Hi all!In a insert-trigger I have two joins on the table named inserted.Obviously this construction gives a name collition beetween the twojoins (since both joins starts from the same table)Ofcourse I thougt the usingbla JOIN bla ON bla bla bla AS a_different_name would work, but itdoes not. Is there a nice solution to this problem?Any help appriciated
I have seen this buried deep with the questions on Service Broker, but I am looking for it again. How do you delete all records from your sys.Transmission_Queue. This is on a test server and I want to clean it before some more test.
is there any way of getting the identity without using the "@@idemtity" in sql??? I'm trying to use the inserted event of ObjectDataSource, with Outputparameters, can anybody help me???
I've two instances(Default, Named[dynamicsFINANCE]) running on SQL server 2014. However, when I try to connect to named instance say (dynamicsFINANCE) using SQL authentication from local SSMS, I get below error message:
A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 26 - Error Locating Server/Instance Specified) (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: -1)
I assigned a static port number to the named instance [dynamicsFINANCE] 1450. I also setup the firewall rule to allow access to Port 1450.
I have a 3 node cluster on which I have installed SSAS as it's own insntance. I have created this as a named instance and can connect to it by serverinstance if I'm on the server itself. However from my desktop I get the error saying instance was not found on server name.
I have defined an alternate port and setup firewall rules and can connect via server:port but not serverinstance. Prior to making this change SSAS was running on default port of 2383 and I could connect just by servername.
I have read many articles for previous versions saying that clustered SSAS will always use 2383 and that you must connect just using servername. However and this is were it gets strange. I have a 2 node UAT cluster with SSAS setup exactly the same way I've described above and I can connect from my desktop as serverinstance.
Should I be able to connect as serverinstances for a named clustered instance in 2012 ?
Are lock hints propagated to the underlying tables of system catolog views? I ask because I often query sys.transmission_queue with nolock, and I wanted to know if this was honoured through out the underlying tables.
Secondly, is sys.transmission_queue indexed at all, providing a way to prevent table-scanning?
Is there any thought going into moving these two tables to a file group that we can control? Putting this in Primary with the rest of my system tables is quite problematic, and hinders my ability to manage space usage on my files. Traditionally, we didn't have to consider a primary file group that could grow to large proportions, but now with these two tables it can. If a large volume of messages gets sent through and the system can't keep up, then these tables and my primary file group will grow sometimes enormously.
I want to move one database from the source SQL Server 2000 instance to a new SQL 2000 instance in another machine. I have five user databases in this source SQL instance. How should be my approach to move this single database out of this ? My understanding is restoring this database in the new instance, copying all logins to the new instance and then copying the jobs, DTS packages, alerts, operators only specific to this database will do it. Please let me know if this is exactly what I should do ..
I want to move one database from the source SQL Server 2000 instance to a new SQL 2000 instance in another machine. I have five user databases in this source SQL instance. How should be my approach to move this single database out of this ? My understanding is restoring this database in the new instance, copying all logins to the new instance and then copying the jobs, DTS packages, alerts, operators only specific to this database will do it. Please let me know if this is exactly what I should do ..
i have installed SQL client instance on my Desktop "Machine-A", and i used to connect to SQLServer2000 running on another "Machine-B" by using valid username and password.
i created a DTS package and i used to run it. im very confused how the communication happens between the two machines and which process run where and which initiates which and which machine allocates waht resources. im really interested to know all these things. if any one know plz help me out.
as Christopher Yager say in "Need distributed service broker sample", I also test sending messages between two SQL Server 2005 instances,and after I setup the test environment with instance1 and instance2,I find queue [q2] in ssb2 can't receive message from ssb1. when I query by "select * from sys.transmission_queue",I get some message records that transmission_status is "64(error not found)".
Hi was wondering whether it is possible to log somewhere outside SB that there are messages in the transmission_queue because the Target queue was disabled.
I was testing this scenario:
try to send messages on a disabled queue and log the problem.
But the transmission_status from the trasmission_queue is always empty.
This is the code that I tried to execute between the send and the commit and after the commit:
WHILE (1=1)
BEGIN
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION .....
SEND ON CONVERSATION ......
if select count(*) from sys.transmission_queue <> 0 BEGIN
set @transmission_status = (select transmission_status from sys.transmission_queue where conversation_handle=@dialog_handle);
if @transmission_status = ''
--Successful send - Exit the LOOP
BEGIN
UPDATE Mytable set isReceivedSuccessfully = 1 where ID = @IDMessageXML;
BREAK;
END
ELSE
raiserror(@transmission_status,1,1) with log;
END
ELSE
BEGIN
UPDATE [dbo].[tblDumpMsg] set isReceivedSuccessfully = 1 where ID = @IDMessageXML;
BREAK;
END
END
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
As I wrote before the @transmission_status variable is always empty and I have the same result even if I put the code after the commit transaction!
Maybe what I'm trying to reach has no sense?
With the event notification I can notify when the queue is disable because the receive rollsback 5 times but what if by mistake the target queue is disabled outside the SB environment? I can I catch it and handle it properly?
Got windows Vista Business edition, installed Visual Web Developer Express, SQL Server 2005 Express SP2, SQL Server Management Studio SP1 in that order. I was developing in VWD express without problems using WinXP but now on Vista Business, the local connection to SQL server appears to be a problem. I know there's nothing wrong with my web.config or anything like that as it was working perfectly prior to running under Vista. If i specify the database on the live website, it works fine. If I specify the test database in app_data folder, I get the following exception:-
Server Error in '/UKSD' Application.
Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.] System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) +736211 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +188 System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Run(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler, TdsParserStateObject stateObj) +1959 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.CompleteLogin(Boolean enlistOK) +33 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.AttemptOneLogin(ServerInfo serverInfo, String newPassword, Boolean ignoreSniOpenTimeout, Int64 timerExpire, SqlConnection owningObject) +237 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.LoginNoFailover(String host, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance, SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Int64 timerStart) +374 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +192 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) +170 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection) +130 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options) +28 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject) +424 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject) +66 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) +496 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +82 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111 System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHolder.Open(HttpContext context, Boolean revertImpersonate) +84 System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHelper.GetConnection(String connectionString, Boolean revertImpersonation) +197 System.Web.Security.SqlRoleProvider.GetRolesForUser(String username) +771 System.Web.Security.RolePrincipal.IsInRole(String role) +272 System.Web.Configuration.AuthorizationRule.IsTheUserInAnyRole(StringCollection roles, IPrincipal principal) +120 System.Web.Configuration.AuthorizationRule.IsUserAllowed(IPrincipal user, String verb) +300 System.Web.Configuration.AuthorizationRuleCollection.IsUserAllowed(IPrincipal user, String verb) +191 System.Web.Security.UrlAuthorizationModule.OnEnter(Object source, EventArgs eventArgs) +3509206 System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +92 System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +64
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.312; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.312
I am taking a guess it's somerthing to do with access issues, but can't find anything out on searching the forums etc.. I am setup as an administrator, running VWD as an administrator and for the record, SQL Server Management Studio express works fine. Another small issue, when I run the application from VWD, I always have to minimise the application and restore it as the graphics get corrupt. Please help!! I cannot debug when running of the live website.
I have spent days searching the web and forums for an answer to this simple question and cannot find an example.
I have built a service broker application on sql server 2005. The application puts some xml on an incoming queue which is basically a few parameters to be used in a query. This queue will then call a stored proc which does some business logic and puts the resulting results in another queue also in xml.
I have written a test harness in SQL to put messages on the inbound queue and then some sql to retrieve the returned code from the outbound queue.
What I want to do is be able to convert the SQL which does this into .net code to be used by an application. i.e. write in .net some code to put xml on a queue and then write some .net code to retrieve xml from another queue.
I wouldn't have thought this would be a difficult thing to do and would have been done hundreds of times, but unable to find anything to simply send and retrieve XML to service broker queues....
thanks for your help.. its really needed. I found some links, but they are really vague and often doing select statments in service broker or something like this. I don't want to call any sql, just send and recieve XML on the queues.
any example code that does this, would be really helpfull
As a starter i tried to modify and translate the Personal Website Starters kit from the VS2005Team SDK.
When i'm working on the machine were it's installed , under debugging, all works great.
But when i try to develop from my laptop, via RDP on the develop machine, i've got this message and can not debug (connect to the SQLxpres Server)
Does anybody now a solution ?? Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.
Source Error:
Line 5: Sub Application_Start(ByVal sender As [Object], ByVal e As EventArgs) Line 6: AddHandler SiteMap.SiteMapResolve, AddressOf Me.AppendQueryString Line 7: If (Roles.RoleExists("Administrators") = False) Then Line 8: Roles.CreateRole("Administrators") Line 9: End If
my web app was working fine but as soon as i added in a page and few store procedures and 2 tables it just pop up with that error message. Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.
i did go into the folder C:Documents and SettingsdnguyenLocal SettingsApplication DataMicrosoftMicrosoft SQL Server Datasqlexpress and delete the directory but this didnt help much. I still get the same error message. please help
I have just reinstalled windows xp pro with service pack 2 and framework 2.0. I am using SQL Express and visual studion 2005. I am trying to run my website and i keep getting this error message, i followed few instructions but i still failed to make it work. could someone who faced similar issues guide me,
thanks
MM
Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed
Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code.
Exception Details: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.
Source Error:
Line 112: Public Overridable Property Theme() As String Line 113: Get Line 114: Return CType(Me.GetPropertyValue("Theme"),String) Line 115: End Get Line 116: Set Source File: C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Fileswroxunitedeecd65d2e1a6a798App_Code.ws-dzmjl.6.vb Line: 114
Stack Trace:
[SqlException (0x80131904): Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.] System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) +437 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +82 System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105 System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111 System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHolder.Open(HttpContext context, Boolean revertImpersonate) +84 System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHelper.GetConnection(String connectionString, Boolean revertImpersonation) +197 System.Web.Profile.SqlProfileProvider.GetPropertyValuesFromDatabase(String userName, SettingsPropertyValueCollection svc) +766 System.Web.Profile.SqlProfileProvider.GetPropertyValues(SettingsContext sc, SettingsPropertyCollection properties) +428 System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertiesFromProvider(SettingsProvider provider) +410 System.Configuration.SettingsBase.GetPropertyValueByName(String propertyName) +117 System.Configuration.SettingsBase.get_Item(String propertyName) +89 System.Web.Profile.ProfileBase.GetInternal(String propertyName) +36 System.Web.Profile.ProfileBase.get_Item(String propertyName) +68 System.Web.Profile.ProfileBase.GetPropertyValue(String propertyName) +4 ProfileCommon.get_Theme() in C:WINDOWSMicrosoft.NETFrameworkv2.0.50727Temporary ASP.NET Fileswroxunitedeecd65d2e1a6a798App_Code.ws-dzmjl.6.vb:114 Wrox.Web.GlobalEvents.ThemeModule.app_PreRequestHandlerExecute(Object Sender, EventArgs E) in C:WebsiteWroxUnitedApp_CodeThemeModule.vb:30 System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +92 System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +64
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.832; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.832
I am new in .NET development and currently trying to learn VWB through Microsoft online tutorials.
Here is the problem that prevents me from getting further:
in VWB, when you right click App_Data and chose "Add New Item" and then select SQL database, the following error message is displayed:
"Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed."
If I cancel out of it, it does generate mdf file under App_Data folder in Solution Explorer, but when I try to open it, it says:
"The item does not exist in the Web directory. t may have been moved, renamed or deleted." and that is where the whole sharade deadends.
I can connect via mycomputersqlexpress under Data Connections in Database Explorer (it then adds "master.dbo" to the path) and then create custom tables, but that is not the same, isn't it? I mean, this will not integrate my database tables through default configuration that I am trying to follow?
when I try to connect to an mdf as a power user, --------------------------- Microsoft Visual Basic 2005 Express Edition --------------------------- Failed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed. --------------------------- OK ---------------------------
I was able to do do this before until Saturady when I had to re-install sql server, and express etc due to some system problem on my xp Pro PC. What have I misconfigured?
I do see the service SQL Serer(SQLEXPRESS) started under Network Service and SQL Serfver(MSSQLSERVER) started under local system.
My power user ID does have modify access to the sql 90 database folders. and to the mdf.
No wonder Microsoft is giving it away for free. It€™s not worth anything. I am very disappointed in this version of SQL server. I decided to start learning VB so I downloaded and installed VB 2005 express edition and SQL 2005 express. I tried to build a personal website using the starter kit. I kept getting the following error message, for which I have seen numerous postings on this forum. €śFailed to generate a user instance of SQL Server due to a failure in starting the process for the user instance. The connection will be closed.€? I went out and bought the Standard version of VS 2005 thinking there may be a feature that the free express version is lacking. I uninstalled the express version, cleaned the registry, deleted all the folders it created and installed the Standard edition. Then I tried to create a personal web using the starter kit and it does the same thing again. I can not create a database file, connect to a database file. I can not create or attach a database on the SQL 2005 express from VS 2005. The SQL server Express seems to be working OK since I can attach to it using Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express. There is something about the way VS tries to connect to the database server that is not working. VB does recognize the local computer as a SQL server but can not connect to it. SQL server is set to accept Shared memory, TCP/IP and named pipes for local clients. What is causing this? This is some information on the system I am using:
MS XP (SP2)
Microsoft Visual Studio 2005 Version 8.0.50727.42 (RTM.050727-4200) Microsoft .NET Framework Version 2.0.50727 Installed Edition: Standard
Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express 9.00.1399.00 Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC) 2000.085.1117.00 (xpsp_sp2_rtm.040803-2158) Microsoft MSXML 2.6 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0.2900.2180 Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0.50727.42 Operating System 5.1.2600
I am now to programming but nor computer illiterate. I have been working with MS SQL servers since version 6.5 and have MCSE, Network+, A+ and Security plus certifications. Installing and using VS should not be this problematic. What is wrong with Microsoft?
