Schema Issue - MSSQL 2005

Mar 27, 2008

Hi,


In one of the application we recently migrated the database from MSSQL
2000 to MSSQL 2005.





We are using the user sa for our database and when we import data from one table to another ,we
are getting the error as "Ambigoius table name Address".






and in another machine we got this error message.

"The source DB Connection have access to multiple schemas. Restrict the
access to required schema for the user."




It is expecting some schema to be refered since all the database have
'sa' as user in common in MSSQL database.





can anyone show how the jdbc url syntax for including the schema in
MSSQL 2005 for the user sa ?



Thanks

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Deploying MSSQL 2005 Express DB To MSSQL 2005 WKGP Errors

Sep 29, 2006

DB is developed on local computer with MSSQL 2005 Express. My host is on MSSQL 2005 workgroup. Are they compatible, because I am getting errors? Is my approach wrong?

I have tried several approaches.

A) I created a backup of database on my local, then placed a copy on the server. Then I tried to restore through Server Management Studio. I get this error.

TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio

------------------------------

An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)

------------------------------

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

The backed-up database has on-disk structure version 611. The server supports version 539 and cannot restore or upgrade this database.

RESTORE FILELIST is terminating abnormally. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 3169)

For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=08.00.2039&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=3169&LinkId=20476

------------------------------

BUTTONS:

OK

------------------------------



B: I also have tried copying the database. I put it in the same path as the other databases that can be read with server management studio on the server. Then, tried to get to it through server managements studio and it did not appear. So I tried to attach it. Then I received this error:

TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio

------------------------------

Attach database failed for Server 'MROACH1'. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)

For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.2047.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText&EvtID=Attach+database+Server&LinkId=20476

------------------------------

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:

An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)

------------------------------

Could not find row in sysindexes for database ID 10, object ID 1, index ID 1. Run DBCC CHECKTABLE on sysindexes.

Could not open new database 'LodgingDB'. CREATE DATABASE is aborted. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 602)

For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=602&LinkId=20476

------------------------------

BUTTONS:

OK

------------------------------

C: I have also tried opening the Database, and back up file through Server Management Studio. without success.

D: I also tried Windows and Software update at microsoft update, but no updates were recommended for Version on Server.

I'm surprised this is so hard. My original data base was created in same family of software. 2005 MS SQL Express. I could use some direct help from someone experienced with this. Am I doing it wrong or are the DB versions incompatible.

Mark Roach





View 5 Replies View Related

Server Configuration For MSSQL 2000 And MSSQL 2005

Sep 6, 2006

Does enabling/disabling Data Execution Prevention have a performanceimpact on SQL 2000 or SQL 2005?For SQL best performance - how should I configure for:Processor Scheduling:Programs or Background servicesMemory Usage:Programs or System Cache

View 9 Replies View Related

Creating Index In MSSQL 2000 From MSSQL 2005

Mar 24, 2008

Hi,

I am a bit new to the MSSQL server. In our application, we use so many SQL queries. To imporve the performance, we used the Database enigine Tuning tool to create the indexes. The older version of the application supports MSSQL 2000 also. To re-create these new indexes, I have an issue in running these "CREATE INDEX" commands as the statements generated for index creation are done in MSSQL 2005. The statements include "INCLUDES" keyword which is supported in MSSQL 2005 but not in MSSQL 2000.

Ex:-

CREATE INDEX IND_001_PPM_PA ON PPM_PROCESS_ACTIVITY

(ACTIVITY_NAME ASC, PROCESS_NAME ASC, START_TIME ASC, ISMONITORED ASC)

INCLUDE

(INSTANCE_ID, ACTIVITY_TYPE, STATUS, END_TIME, ORGANIZATION);


Any help in creating such indexes in 2000 version is welcome.

Thanks,
Suresh.

View 2 Replies View Related

Generating Script For MSSQL 2000 From MSSQl 2005?

May 3, 2008

Hello
We are using SQL 2005 and now we are planning to use SQL 2000. what are the ways to do the process.

We taken the script spcificall for 2000 and run it in SQL 200. But we are getting the error in SCRIPT?

Could you please give me the step to do?

Thanks,
Sankar R

View 6 Replies View Related

Migrate MSSQL 2005 Express -&&> MSSQL 2005 Srv

Apr 25, 2006

Hi!

What is the best way to migrate MSSQL 2005 Express -> MSSQL 2005 Srv?

View 4 Replies View Related

MSSQL Express 2005 Vs. MSSQL 2000

Jun 15, 2006

Ben writes "I have a sql script that doesn't function very well when it's executed on a SQL 2000 server.

The scrpt looks like this:


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
USE [master]
GO
IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM master.dbo.syslogins WHERE loginname = N'SSDBUSERNAME')
EXEC sp_addlogin N'SSDBUSERNAME', N'SSDBPASSWORD'
GO
GRANT ADMINISTER BULK OPERATIONS TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT AUTHENTICATE SERVER TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT CONNECT SQL TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT CONTROL SERVER TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT CREATE ANY DATABASE TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
USE [master]
GO
If EXISTS (Select * FROM master.dbo.syslogins WHERE loginname = N'SSDBUSERNAME')
ALTER LOGIN [SSDBUSERNAME] WITH PASSWORD=N'SSDBPASSWORD'
GO
GRANT ADMINISTER BULK OPERATIONS TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT AUTHENTICATE SERVER TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT CONNECT SQL TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT CONTROL SERVER TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
GRANT CREATE ANY DATABASE TO [SSDBUSERNAME]
GO
USE [master]
GO
IF EXISTS (select * from dbo.sysdatabases where name = 'ISIZ')
DROP DATABASE [ISIZ]
GO
USE [SurveyData]
GO
exec sp_adduser 'SSDBUSERNAME'
GRANT INSERT, UPDATE, SELECT, DELETE
TO SSDBUSERNAME
GO
USE [SurveyManagement]
GO
exec sp_adduser 'SSDBUSERNAME'
GRANT INSERT, UPDATE, SELECT, DELETE
TO SSDBUSERNAME
---------------------------------------------------------------


I need to be converted to a script that can be executed on both MSSQL 2000 and MSSQL 2005.

I was wondering if somebody there could help me with this problem?!

Thanks,
Ben"

View 1 Replies View Related

Migration MSSQL 2000 32-bit To MSSQL 2005 64-bit

Nov 17, 2007

I've been tasked to move our production databases on MSSQL 2000 to 2005. I've supported MSSQL since version 6.5 and performed migrations to successor versions.

Current Environment is MSSQL 2000 32-bit with current Service Packs.

I've performed mock migrations on Test servers upgrading all Production instances simultaneously from MSSQL 2000 to 2005 32-bit. The Test environment is identical to Production minus server name, IP etc. Also I have a separate server with MSSQL 2005 installed where I use the DETACH / ATTACH and BACKUP / RESTORE method for migration / acceptance testing. There are approximately 30 databases totaling 70 GB. This has gone as expected and fairly successful. Vendors have been coordinated with to update code and staff for acceptance testing.

I'd prefer going directly to MSSQL 2005 64-bit instead if possible due to memory benefits etc. This is where I'd like some feedback prior to borrowing a 64-bit server for testing.

Upgrade options:

1. Is it better to migrate from MSSQL 2000 32-bit to 2005 64-bit via:
a. DETACH / ATTACH
b. BACKUP / RESTORE
c. Is one method more advantageous relating to the end result?
2. Regarding XP clients, have issues been experienced with the default SQL Server driver or is an alternate recommended for XP clients to connect to a MSSQL 64-bit server databases?
3. If you have performed this migration and have relevant experience please pass them along.

View 3 Replies View Related

Conversion Of MSSql 2000 Database To MSSQL 2005 Database

Jan 18, 2008

How to convert a database in MSSQL 2000 to MSSQL 2005 database.Is there any tool or documentation available for this?

View 3 Replies View Related

MSSQL 2005 Vs. Visual Studio 2005 Service Pack 1

Mar 14, 2007

Hi,
for some reason, when I've installed visual studio 2005, I didn't install also SQL server.
Than I've updated VS with Service Pack 1 (thank god, I was trying unsucesfully for about 2 weeks :/ ).

Than I want to install MSSQL 2005 and an error came up:

Message displayed to user
SQL Server 2005 Setup has detected incompatible components from beta versions of Visual Studio, .NET Framework, or SQL Server 2005. Use Add or Remove Programs to remove these components, and then run SQL Server 2005 Setup again. For detailed instructions on uninstalling SQL Server 2005, see the SQL Server 2005 Readme.
SQL Server Setup has detected that the following required component is not installed: Microsoft Windows Installer 3.1. To proceed, download and install the Windows Installer 3.1 Redistributable from http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=50380 , and then run SQL Server Setup again.

1. The http link leads to main page of MS Download Centre.
2. I have Installer 3.1. (version of file c:windowssystem32msiexec.exe said so)
3. I really do not have any beta version of any mentioned SW. I never had.

So I think the issue could be, that installer is checking for not updated version of Visual Studio.
(I was searching through net/msdn and seems no one had this problem (maybe wrong keywords, though) ).

I'm running setup.exe from CD1.

Uninstalling of VS Service Pack 1 is not an option. I really don't want to spent another week by installing it.
Please tell that there is some another way :) .
Thanks a lot.

Here are some logs:

SQLSetup0001_COMP_Datastore.xml

<Datastore>
<Scope Type="SetupBootstrapOptionsScope" Id="2336">
<Property Id="QuietSwitchPresent">0</Property>
<Property Id="LogSwitchPresent">0</Property>
<Property Id="ErrorReporting">0</Property>
<Property Id="DeleteManifestFileMode">1</Property>
<Property Id="MultiInstanceEnabled">0</Property>
<Property Id="ComponentUpdateOnly">0</Property>
<Property Id="ReducedUI">0</Property>
<Property Id="PatchedSetup">0</Property>
<Property Id="LocalSetup">0</Property>
<Property Id="InitiateReboot">0</Property>
<Property Id="HostSetup">1</Property>
<Property Id="RemoteMode">0</Property>
<Property Id="Remote">0</Property>
<Property Id="LoosenedSccChecks">{ }</Property>
<Property Id="DisabledSccChecks">{ }</Property>
<Property Id="LocalRebootPending">1</Property>
<Property Id="CmdLine">********</Property>
<Property Id="InstallMediaPath">Y:</Property>
</Scope>
<Scope Type="SetupStateScope" Id="">
<Property Id="machineName">COMP</Property>
<Property Id="logDirectory">C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOG</Property>
<Property Id="logSummaryFilename">C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGSummary.txt</Property>
<Property Id="logSequenceNumber">1</Property>
<Property Id="primaryLogFiles">{ ["C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0001_COMP_Core.log"], ["C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGSummary.txt"] }</Property>
<Property Id="watsonFailedAction">PerformSCCAction2</Property>
<Property Id="watsonFailedActionErrorCode">87</Property>
<Property Id="watsonFailedFunction">sqls::PerformSCCAction::perform</Property>
<Property Id="watsonFailedFunctionErrorCode">87</Property>
<Property Id="watsonSourceFileAndLineNo">setupsqlsetupactions.cpp@1390</Property>
<Property Id="watsonModuleAndVersion">setup.exe@2005.90.1399.0</Property>
<Property Id="watsonMsi">None</Property>
<Property Id="watsonMsiAndVersion">None</Property>
<Property Id="watsonSourceFile">setupsqlsetupactions.cpp</Property>
</Scope>
</Datastore>


SQLSetup0001_COMP_Core.log

Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup beginning at Wed Mar 14 18:23:08 2007
Process ID : 2336
Y:setup.exe Version: 2005.90.1399.0
Running: LoadResourcesAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8
Complete: LoadResourcesAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8, returned true
Running: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8
Loaded DLL:Y:xmlrw.dll Version:2.0.3604.0
Complete: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8, returned true
Running: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8
Complete: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8, returned true
Running: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8
Complete: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8, returned true
Running: PerformSCCAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8
Complete: PerformSCCAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8, returned true
Running: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8
Complete: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8, returned true
Delay load of action "DetectPatchedBootstrapAction" returned nothing. No action will occur as a result.
Action "LaunchPatchedBootstrapAction" will be skipped due to the following restrictions:
Condition "EventCondition: __STP_LaunchPatchedBootstrap__2336" returned false.
Running: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2007/2/14 18:23:8
Error: Action "PerformSCCAction2" threw an exception during execution.
Return Code: 87
Message displayed to user
SQL Server 2005 Setup has detected incompatible components from beta versions of Visual Studio, .NET Framework, or SQL Server 2005. Use Add or Remove Programs to remove these components, and then run SQL Server 2005 Setup again. For detailed instructions on uninstalling SQL Server 2005, see the SQL Server 2005 Readme.
SQL Server Setup has detected that the following required component is not installed: Microsoft Windows Installer 3.1. To proceed, download and install the Windows Installer 3.1 Redistributable from http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=50380 , and then run SQL Server Setup again.

Class not registered.
Running: UploadDrWatsonLogAction at: 2007/2/14 18:23:9
Message pump returning: 87

View 2 Replies View Related

Converting SQL Express 2005 To MSSQL 2005 Database

Jul 14, 2007

Hello, im shure this must have been up before and i apologize for that. But i wonder if there is a way to convert the SQL server express databases to MSSQL 2005 databses?

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Schema Issues

Aug 31, 2007

I just upgraded from SQL 2000 to 2005 and have been reading up on the new 2005 schemas and how they can be used to simplify assigning permissions, etc.  I started experimenting yesterday with a dummy database and ran into a few issues in which I have questions.  Note, I am wanting to use Windows authentication as much as possible where end users will be accessing the database via a mapped Windows group.  Based on what I've read thus far on the net this presents an issue in that users who access the database via a mapped windows group are not assigned a default schema.
My concern with migrating to using schemas for protecting objects is the potential for breaking existing applications based on the way objects are referenced in code.  Most of the existing code simply references the object only ...such as 'mytable' vice 'dbo.mytable'.  If I understand SQL 2005 schemas correctly if only the object is referenced in code (i.e. 'mytable') then SQL 2005 looks in the sys schema first then the dbo schema, etc. in attempt to find the object.  Basically it defaults to the dbo schema.  But issue I forsee is if I used a custom schema ('MySchema') coupled with users accessing the database via a mapped windows group.  This is supposedly where a default schema cannot be assigned ...and since db objects won't reside in the 'dbo' schema the SQL won't be able to locate the referenced objects (I.e. 'mytable') and will in turn break applications?
 If my assumptions above are correct then it would appear I have limited choices.  Use the 'dbo' schema for everything ...or abandon schemas entirely?

View 4 Replies View Related

[2005 Express]Add SPs To A Schema?

Oct 30, 2006

I have SQL Server 2005 Express set up on a PC. I imported a backup of an MSDE database. All of the database objects are there. However, I need to assign permissions to my Stored Procedures. So, using Management Studio Express, I saw absolutely no way of adding a stored procedure to a schema or to a user. So I downloaded SQL Server 2005 Developer from my MSDN account. I installed the client tools to get the full version of Management Studio. Same thing. No way to add permissions to a SP. Some web articles say to right-click the SP and select Properties. However, there is no "Properties" in the right-click menu!!! There is only Rename, Delete, Modify, etc. How can something so easy with an old product be so difficult with a new one? Does anyone know how to accomplish adding permissions to SPs?I can right-click a table or a View and get the popup window with the list view and contents to set permissions to tables and views.

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Schema Best Practices

Jan 3, 2008

Hello,

In general, with the introduction of schemas in 2005, is it considered "bad practice" to tell people to create new tables in the "dbo" schema?

Our product documentation contains a "quick start" guide for users who just want to get the product up and runing. We suggest that the customer creates a database for our application. This database is configured with a user that is assigned to the 'db_owner' role (we want to keep things as simple as possible) that we use to connect to the database. This database will only be used by our application. In this situtation is it okay to use the "dbo" schema, or should we consider creating another schmea for all our tables?

Are the any "best practices" for using schemas in SQL 2005?

Thanks,
Brenden.

View 7 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Schema

Sep 27, 2006

A database was created in SQL 2000. We are going to move to sql 2005. So I attached a database to SQL 2005 and now I have a problem with name resolution. When I worked with SQL 2000 I did not put my schema's name before table name (select * from table1). The schema's name is my user name (IQA) and by default the schema name is a name of user who loged in. (in 2000)

Here is a problem with SQL 2005. The schema's name is still IQA. But I need to do select * from IQA.table1.

I created IQA login and IQA user is an onwer my IQA schema but I still can not do a select without schema name. I need to resolve this because VB.Net code has all select statement without schema's name. Need help!!!

View 4 Replies View Related

Schema Name Has Changed In SQL-server 2005!

Nov 9, 2007

I am using sql server 2005 express. When I created a new database my schema name was dbo and my stored procedures looks like this:
dbo.sp_name
Now when I am creating new sp:s my schema name has change to DOMAINUsername:
 DOMAINUsername.sp_name
 My webb application cant find any sp:s with this schema name and I don't now how to change schema name back to dbo. What has happened, what is this schema name and why has my schema name been changed!? Please help me out!
 

View 1 Replies View Related

Information Schema In SQL Server 2005

Sep 6, 2007

Information Schema is the part of the SQL-92 standard which exposes the metadata of the database. I have written a small article that exposes the same. Let me know your comments on the same. http://aspalliance.com/1380_Information_Schema_and_SQL_Server_2005

Uday Denduluri
Software Engineer
Refer my articles at http://aspalliance.com/author.aspx?uId=62740

View 5 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Standard Report Schema Changes

Jan 28, 2008

i notice there is a nice little report that is maintaining all schema changes, this is becoming rather large.

Is there a way to tidy up the changes on a weekly basic.

Thanks

View 1 Replies View Related

Export Schema In SqlServer 2005

Sep 1, 2005

Hi all,sorry for the rather trivial question but I couldn't figure this out bymyself.How do you export a db schema either from the commandline or from theGUI (if I remember correctly it's called Management Studio in the newversion).Thanks in advance,Lorenzo

View 2 Replies View Related

Relation Schema SQL Server 2005

Nov 26, 2007

Hi Group,(I am just starting with SQL Server 2005.)On SQL Server 7 I used often the nice relation schema, where I used todraw out the whole database, especially the Foreign Keys constraints.I found these relational schemas very handy to study an old database Ibuild a few years earlier that needs some updating.I tried to find such an utility in SQL Server 2005, but cannot find it.I did found the FK-constraints, but it is just an popup where I candefine them.The overview such a visual schema gave was really great and I miss it.Question: Is it gone in SQL Sevrer 2005, or do I just not know where tolook? If the latter, please guide me. :)Thanks for your time.Regards,Erwin Moller

View 1 Replies View Related

Granting Permissions Using SQL 2005 Schema...

Aug 15, 2007

All,

I have been asked to grant a Windows group Full access to all tables under our Sandbox Schema. This will allow these users to do anything to the tables under this Schema.

I created the Windows Group (Sandbox Users), created the login in SQL, created the user in the database that is tied to the Windows group, then ran GRANT CONTROL ON SCHEMA::[Sandbox] TO [Sandbox Users].

I have verified that the users are in the Windows group, but they state that they still can not delete tables under the Sandbox Schema.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks,

Justin

View 5 Replies View Related

Programmatically Remove Schema From SQL 2005 (C#)

Dec 11, 2007



I NEED HELP! Does anyone know how to remove a database schema from SQL Server 2005 using C#? I have a web application that deletes users. In SQL2k, I am able to simply delete the users. In SQL2005, I must delete or alter the schema BEFORE I can delete the users. Of course, the query below works, but how can I get this to work in code for a web application?


USE EAST_USERS

DROP SCHEMA "plijsmith"

Thanks

View 4 Replies View Related

Tracking Schema Changes In SQL Server 2005 Db

Jul 11, 2006

I wonder how can I track the changes in the columns whether added, deleted or their name is changed and how can I test that?

your help is appreciated

View 9 Replies View Related

Schema And Principals (Sql Server 2005)

Aug 29, 2005

Hello Everyone,

View 12 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 Schema And Security

Aug 7, 2006

Hi everyone,

I'm currently investigating the security improvements of SQL Server 2005. I've got some problems with the schemas introduced in SQL 2005 and security settings.

For my test I've created two schemas: UserManagement and Sales. A user "test" is attached to the UserManagement schema. There's a table Sales.Users containing a list of users (varchar) and a stored procedure named UserManagement.AddUser that can be executed by the UserManagement schema (GRANT EXECUTE, so "test" can execute the SP). UserManagement.AddUser simply inserts a new row into Sales.Users.

Because the Sales schema doesn't contain any user, nobody (except the sysadmin, of course) can do a INSERT/SELECT/DELETE in the Sales.Users table. As expected, the following SQL statement fails:

EXECUTE AS LOGIN='machine est';
INSERT INTO Sales.Users VALUES('Test User');

INSERT was not allowed: object 'Users', database 'test', schema 'Sales'.
The second way of inserting rows into Sales.Users is to execute the stored proc UserManagement.AddUser:
CREATE PROCEDURE [UserManagement].[AddUser]
WITH EXECUTE AS CALLER
AS
INSERT INTO Sales.Users VALUES('Test User');
The user "test" can execute this sproc without problems:
EXECUTE AS LOGIN='machine est';
EXECUTE UserManagement.AddUser;

(1 row(s) affected)To my astonishment the INSERT statement inside the stored proc does execute - although UserManagement.AddUser and Sales.Users are two different schemas. Why is that, is there a chaining happening? To my understanding SQL Server should test INSERT rights on Sales.Users for the UserManagement schema and deny the INSERT statement because UserManagement isn't allowed to INSERT in the Sales schema.

Any ideas? Help regarding the issue is greatly appreciated.

Best regards,

Alex

View 3 Replies View Related

The 'System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider' Requires A Database Schema Compatible With Schema Version '1'.

Sep 27, 2007

Locally I develop in SQL server 2005 enterprise. Recently I recreated my db on the server of my hosting company (in sql server 2005 express).I basically recreated the tables and copied the data in it.I now receive the following error when I hit the DB:The 'System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider' requires a
database schema compatible with schema version '1'.  However, the
current database schema is not compatible with this version.  You may
need to either install a compatible schema with aspnet_regsql.exe
(available in the framework installation directory), or upgrade the
provider to a newer version.I heard something about running aspnet_regsql.exe, but I dont have that access to the DB. Also I dont know if this command does anything more than creating the membership tables and filling it with some default data...Any other solutions/thought on what this can be?Thanks!

View 4 Replies View Related

Needs A SQL 2005 Data And Schema Compare Tool

Mar 12, 2008

Just wondering if there are any tools available for SQL Server 2005 which allow the comparison and scripting of data and schema between two databases. This is so that I can migrate between Dev, QA, and Live easily.

A free tool would be best please..

Thanks in advance.
Gaj

View 11 Replies View Related

How To Change The Schema Owner In Sql Server 2005?

Apr 22, 2008

Hi,
While i trying to drop the user,i getting the following error:
(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 15138)"

Now,i wanna change the owner of that schema,Which is associated with the schema,which i am trying to delete.

How to transfer the owner?

Plz help me.

View 1 Replies View Related

User/schema Problem In SQL Server 2005!

Oct 13, 2006

do the following steps:1:Use Manage Studio login the server with Integrated security.2:Create a dabase named testdb;3:Create a SQL Server login named amber ,and set it to be dbowner oftestdb;4:Create a SQL Server login named guxiaobo ,set it's default databse tobe testbd,and in the testdb databse map login guxiaobo to userguxiaobo;5:Close Manage Studio and reopen it ,this time use login amber log tothe server.6:In database testbd create a databse role role1 owned by dbo;7:In database testdb create a schema schema1 owned by dbo;8:Set user guxiaobo to be member of role1,and set guxiaobo's defaultschema to be schema1;9:In the schema properties-schema1 dialog choose permissions,in theusers or roles listview I add role1 to it.in the explicit permissionsfor role1 listbox,I choose select /update/insert/delete/view definitiongrant checkboxes.and apply the selects.10:In the schema1 schema I create a table:create table a(a int ,bvarchar(10));11:In the dabase role properties-role1 dialog choose securables panel,int securable listview I add the schema1.a table( choose all thecolumns of table a for all permissions),and in explicit permissions forschema1.a I choose all for grant ,then apply the selects.12:Now I use login guxiaobo to log into dabase and issue "select * froma",but got a error msg saying guxiaobo has not enough permission toselect form table a.Does anyone has found anything I missed?

View 6 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Security - Schema &&amp; Username... Very Annoying

Jun 8, 2007

So on my local server I have a username CWI. I have my main DB: CW.

CWI is the owner of 5 schemas on CW, and everything works great.
---
I now go and create a new DataBase called CWTest. I want to now add the user CWI to the security section of CWTest (The same way I did it in 2000).
However, now I get the error message:
"The login already has an account under a different user name."

When I created my DataBase, IT had the default user, but now I want to add another user so I can create my schemas.
---
On our live servers, we will have 100-300 Databases all using the same useraccount as the "God Mode" user.

Any advice?

View 1 Replies View Related

SQL 2005 Schema Problem After Installing SSIS

Feb 8, 2006

I restored a backup from SQL 2000 onto a new SQL 2005 server. The
database restored and the matching user who was the owner of that
database in SQL 2000 was created as a user in SQL 2005 as well as being
designated as the "schema" for that database. I was having
trouble logging in with the user that was created after the restore, so
I created a new user and assinged the new user as DBO of the new
database, set up the new users default database and schema, and
everything was working fine, my database driven application worked
perfectly under that user.



Then I installed SSIS, as it was recomended as a solution to another
problem. After installing SSIS I can not run queries without
specifying a schema name. For example this query will not work,
it returns table not found:



SELECT * FROM <table_name>



However if I specify the schema name like this, the results return:



SELECT * FROM <schema>.<table_name>



This screws up my database application as it does not include the schema name in its transactions.



I do not understand why installing SSIS would have changed this.

View 1 Replies View Related

Transferring Schema From SQL SVR 2005 To Compact Edition?

Mar 4, 2007

I'm building my app in the full blown MS SQL 2005 Standard Edition as our new app will have a enterprise version using SQL 2005 and a desktop version using either SQL Compact Edition 2005, VistaDB3, or maybe even (uggh) SQL Express 2005. I would prefer SQL Express 2005 but the install size of my app + DB would kill sales.

Back to my question. I'm building out the schema in the full SQL 2005, how do I take this schema and get the schema applied to a SQL Compact Edition DB?

Does SQL Compact Edition support DDL?

Thanks.

View 3 Replies View Related

Transferring Objects Form Schema A To Schema B In One Shot....!

May 27, 2008

I have 35+ tables and 15+ stored procedures with SchemaA, now I want to transfer them to SchemaB.

I know how to do one by one...!

alter schema SchemaB transfer
SchemaA.TableA

but it will take long time...!

Thanks,

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved