Schema Name Has Changed In SQL-server 2005!
Nov 9, 2007
I am using sql server 2005 express. When I created a new database my schema name was dbo and my stored procedures looks like this:
dbo.sp_name
Now when I am creating new sp:s my schema name has change to DOMAINUsername:
DOMAINUsername.sp_name
My webb application cant find any sp:s with this schema name and I don't now how to change schema name back to dbo. What has happened, what is this schema name and why has my schema name been changed!? Please help me out!
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 30, 2006
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.2039
Got this error:
Could not complete cursor operation because the table schema changed after the cursor was declared. SQLCode: 16943 SQLState: HY000
Is this a known issue? I suspect the application logic may cause this error. Please advise.
Thanks a lot!
View 16 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2015
we have a table in our ERP database and we copy data from this table into another "stage" table on a nightly basis. is there a way to dynamically alter the schema of the stage table when the source table's structure is changed? in other words, if a new column is added to the source table, i would like to add the column to the stage table during the nightly refresh.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2006
A database was created in SQL 2000. We are going to move to sql 2005. So I attached a database to SQL 2005 and now I have a problem with name resolution. When I worked with SQL 2000 I did not put my schema's name before table name (select * from table1). The schema's name is my user name (IQA) and by default the schema name is a name of user who loged in. (in 2000)
Here is a problem with SQL 2005. The schema's name is still IQA. But I need to do select * from IQA.table1.
I created IQA login and IQA user is an onwer my IQA schema but I still can not do a select without schema name. I need to resolve this because VB.Net code has all select statement without schema's name. Need help!!!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2007
Information Schema is the part of the SQL-92 standard which exposes the metadata of the database. I have written a small article that exposes the same. Let me know your comments on the same. http://aspalliance.com/1380_Information_Schema_and_SQL_Server_2005
Uday Denduluri
Software Engineer
Refer my articles at http://aspalliance.com/author.aspx?uId=62740
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2007
Hi Group,(I am just starting with SQL Server 2005.)On SQL Server 7 I used often the nice relation schema, where I used todraw out the whole database, especially the Foreign Keys constraints.I found these relational schemas very handy to study an old database Ibuild a few years earlier that needs some updating.I tried to find such an utility in SQL Server 2005, but cannot find it.I did found the FK-constraints, but it is just an popup where I candefine them.The overview such a visual schema gave was really great and I miss it.Question: Is it gone in SQL Sevrer 2005, or do I just not know where tolook? If the latter, please guide me. :)Thanks for your time.Regards,Erwin Moller
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2006
I wonder how can I track the changes in the columns whether added, deleted or their name is changed and how can I test that?
your help is appreciated
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2005
Hello Everyone,
View 12 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2006
Hi everyone,
I'm currently investigating the security improvements of SQL Server 2005. I've got some problems with the schemas introduced in SQL 2005 and security settings.
For my test I've created two schemas: UserManagement and Sales. A user "test" is attached to the UserManagement schema. There's a table Sales.Users containing a list of users (varchar) and a stored procedure named UserManagement.AddUser that can be executed by the UserManagement schema (GRANT EXECUTE, so "test" can execute the SP). UserManagement.AddUser simply inserts a new row into Sales.Users.
Because the Sales schema doesn't contain any user, nobody (except the sysadmin, of course) can do a INSERT/SELECT/DELETE in the Sales.Users table. As expected, the following SQL statement fails:
EXECUTE AS LOGIN='machine est';
INSERT INTO Sales.Users VALUES('Test User');
INSERT was not allowed: object 'Users', database 'test', schema 'Sales'.
The second way of inserting rows into Sales.Users is to execute the stored proc UserManagement.AddUser:
CREATE PROCEDURE [UserManagement].[AddUser]
WITH EXECUTE AS CALLER
AS
INSERT INTO Sales.Users VALUES('Test User');
The user "test" can execute this sproc without problems:
EXECUTE AS LOGIN='machine est';
EXECUTE UserManagement.AddUser;
(1 row(s) affected)To my astonishment the INSERT statement inside the stored proc does execute - although UserManagement.AddUser and Sales.Users are two different schemas. Why is that, is there a chaining happening? To my understanding SQL Server should test INSERT rights on Sales.Users for the UserManagement schema and deny the INSERT statement because UserManagement isn't allowed to INSERT in the Sales schema.
Any ideas? Help regarding the issue is greatly appreciated.
Best regards,
Alex
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2008
Hi,
While i trying to drop the user,i getting the following error:
(Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 15138)"
Now,i wanna change the owner of that schema,Which is associated with the schema,which i am trying to delete.
How to transfer the owner?
Plz help me.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2006
do the following steps:1:Use Manage Studio login the server with Integrated security.2:Create a dabase named testdb;3:Create a SQL Server login named amber ,and set it to be dbowner oftestdb;4:Create a SQL Server login named guxiaobo ,set it's default databse tobe testbd,and in the testdb databse map login guxiaobo to userguxiaobo;5:Close Manage Studio and reopen it ,this time use login amber log tothe server.6:In database testbd create a databse role role1 owned by dbo;7:In database testdb create a schema schema1 owned by dbo;8:Set user guxiaobo to be member of role1,and set guxiaobo's defaultschema to be schema1;9:In the schema properties-schema1 dialog choose permissions,in theusers or roles listview I add role1 to it.in the explicit permissionsfor role1 listbox,I choose select /update/insert/delete/view definitiongrant checkboxes.and apply the selects.10:In the schema1 schema I create a table:create table a(a int ,bvarchar(10));11:In the dabase role properties-role1 dialog choose securables panel,int securable listview I add the schema1.a table( choose all thecolumns of table a for all permissions),and in explicit permissions forschema1.a I choose all for grant ,then apply the selects.12:Now I use login guxiaobo to log into dabase and issue "select * froma",but got a error msg saying guxiaobo has not enough permission toselect form table a.Does anyone has found anything I missed?
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 23, 2008
Hi all. I'm mapping FKs in a DataWarehouse and I'm wondering if there is a way to change the schema of a database diagram from dbo.
Thanks,
Charlie
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 17, 2006
We have a commercial VB.NET winforms client/server application that utilizes SQL Server 2005 express edition. The schema and data that the application utilizes is proprietary and could be very damaging if it got into a competitors hands.
Is there any way to protect the data and schema of a sql server 2005 express edition database?
Will this functionality ever be added?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 29, 2007
During web-site development, I am using VStudio 2005 with SQL-Express. I frequently publish changes to my web server that is running SQL- Server 2000 standard edition.
Is there a simple way to replicate changes in database tables design without copying the whole mdf-file and loosing the existing data in the target database?
thanks, Reinhard
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2007
A stored procedure takes an IN parameter, an INOUT parameter, and returns an OUT parameter. When this stored procedure is defined in SQL Server 2000, the JDBC DatabaseMetadata method getProcedureColumns() returns three rows in the resultset:
one for the IN parameter (COLUMN_TYPE=1)
one for the INOUT parameter (COLUMN_TYPE=2), and
one for OUT parameter (COLUMN_TYPE=5).However, when the same stored procedure is defined in SQL Server 2005 (SP2), the getProcedureColumns() method returns only two rows in the resultset:
one for the IN parameter (COLUMN_TYPE=1)
one for the INOUT parameter (COLUMN_TYPE=2).No row for the OUT parameter is returned.
jTDS JDBC driver was used for both of the above tests. When the Microsoft JDBC Driver for 2005 was used against SQL Server 2005, the same behavior (only two rows in the resultset) was observed.
Has someone else run into such a problem? Is this a bug in SQL Server 2005 because the same jTDS driver works as expected against SQL Server 2000 but not against SQL Server 2005? Any feedback will be appreciated.
Thanks,
-- Damodar Periwal
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2006
What system stored procedures have changed between SQL 2000 and SQL 2005?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2008
Some time ago I saw a section in sql 2005 BOL describing the t-sql features that have changed from sql 2000 to sql 2005. For example, some NULL handling and that "*=" is no longer supported. Can anyone find that refernece for me?
TIA,
Barkingdog
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2006
I recently added a new user to my database. Now I want to delete that user, but I keep getting the error above. What do I need to do to delete my recently added user?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2002
Is there any way to reconfigure SQLSERVER if the name of the server was changed after the initial installation of Sql was completed?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2003
Hello,
Soon, we are going to redesign our servers and their positioning insofar as web access is concerned. The SQL Server will go to a DMZ.
Its IP Address (as well as hostname) is to be changed. Can you offer suggestions about what to be aware of on these two items?
I've been involved in a hostname change befoew (and, it's a pain), but never an IP Address.
Thanks, MichaelG
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 31, 2007
I just upgraded from SQL 2000 to 2005 and have been reading up on the new 2005 schemas and how they can be used to simplify assigning permissions, etc. I started experimenting yesterday with a dummy database and ran into a few issues in which I have questions. Note, I am wanting to use Windows authentication as much as possible where end users will be accessing the database via a mapped Windows group. Based on what I've read thus far on the net this presents an issue in that users who access the database via a mapped windows group are not assigned a default schema.
My concern with migrating to using schemas for protecting objects is the potential for breaking existing applications based on the way objects are referenced in code. Most of the existing code simply references the object only ...such as 'mytable' vice 'dbo.mytable'. If I understand SQL 2005 schemas correctly if only the object is referenced in code (i.e. 'mytable') then SQL 2005 looks in the sys schema first then the dbo schema, etc. in attempt to find the object. Basically it defaults to the dbo schema. But issue I forsee is if I used a custom schema ('MySchema') coupled with users accessing the database via a mapped windows group. This is supposedly where a default schema cannot be assigned ...and since db objects won't reside in the 'dbo' schema the SQL won't be able to locate the referenced objects (I.e. 'mytable') and will in turn break applications?
If my assumptions above are correct then it would appear I have limited choices. Use the 'dbo' schema for everything ...or abandon schemas entirely?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2006
I have SQL Server 2005 Express set up on a PC. I imported a backup of an MSDE database. All of the database objects are there. However, I need to assign permissions to my Stored Procedures. So, using Management Studio Express, I saw absolutely no way of adding a stored procedure to a schema or to a user. So I downloaded SQL Server 2005 Developer from my MSDN account. I installed the client tools to get the full version of Management Studio. Same thing. No way to add permissions to a SP. Some web articles say to right-click the SP and select Properties. However, there is no "Properties" in the right-click menu!!! There is only Rename, Delete, Modify, etc. How can something so easy with an old product be so difficult with a new one? Does anyone know how to accomplish adding permissions to SPs?I can right-click a table or a View and get the popup window with the list view and contents to set permissions to tables and views.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 3, 2008
Hello,
In general, with the introduction of schemas in 2005, is it considered "bad practice" to tell people to create new tables in the "dbo" schema?
Our product documentation contains a "quick start" guide for users who just want to get the product up and runing. We suggest that the customer creates a database for our application. This database is configured with a user that is assigned to the 'db_owner' role (we want to keep things as simple as possible) that we use to connect to the database. This database will only be used by our application. In this situtation is it okay to use the "dbo" schema, or should we consider creating another schmea for all our tables?
Are the any "best practices" for using schemas in SQL 2005?
Thanks,
Brenden.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 18, 2015
we are having the same code base in both the environment but we have different version of SQL Server Version(Env 1 - SQL 2012, Env 2 - SQL 2008). We are getting the expected result in Env - 1 but not in the ENV -2. So we tried to get the SQL trace for the web request we found that Date format getting changed.
2012 - Date Format in the SQL Trace for the request '2015-09-10 00:00:00' which is working as expected.
2008 - Date Format in the SQL Trace for the request 'Sep 10 2015 12:00:00:000AM' which is Not working.
Complete SQL Trace for Request.
Evn - 1 - SQL Server 2012
exec dbo.usp_GetWorkQueue @ClientName='CLT',@HasFilter=1,@FacilityName='',@StartDate='2015-09-10 00:00:00',@EndDate='2015-09-18 00:00:00',@OrderDirection='D',@StartIndex=1,@PageSize=20
[code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 1998
Have Trace Flags changed in SQL Server 7?
I need to use T204 because of getting error:
'ORDER BY items must appear in the select list if SELECT DISTINCT IS USED'
when I try to compile stor proc.
I entered T204 as startup parameter and restarted server
but doesn't seem to work.
Any experience with that?
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2008
i notice there is a nice little report that is maintaining all schema changes, this is becoming rather large.
Is there a way to tidy up the changes on a weekly basic.
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 1, 2005
Hi all,sorry for the rather trivial question but I couldn't figure this out bymyself.How do you export a db schema either from the commandline or from theGUI (if I remember correctly it's called Management Studio in the newversion).Thanks in advance,Lorenzo
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2007
All,
I have been asked to grant a Windows group Full access to all tables under our Sandbox Schema. This will allow these users to do anything to the tables under this Schema.
I created the Windows Group (Sandbox Users), created the login in SQL, created the user in the database that is tied to the Windows group, then ran GRANT CONTROL ON SCHEMA::[Sandbox] TO [Sandbox Users].
I have verified that the users are in the Windows group, but they state that they still can not delete tables under the Sandbox Schema.
Anyone have any ideas?
Thanks,
Justin
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2007
I NEED HELP! Does anyone know how to remove a database schema from SQL Server 2005 using C#? I have a web application that deletes users. In SQL2k, I am able to simply delete the users. In SQL2005, I must delete or alter the schema BEFORE I can delete the users. Of course, the query below works, but how can I get this to work in code for a web application?
USE EAST_USERS
DROP SCHEMA "plijsmith"
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2008
Hi,
In one of the application we recently migrated the database from MSSQL
2000 to MSSQL 2005.
We are using the user sa for our database and when we import data from one table to another ,we
are getting the error as "Ambigoius table name Address".
and in another machine we got this error message.
"The source DB Connection have access to multiple schemas. Restrict the
access to required schema for the user."
It is expecting some schema to be refered since all the database have
'sa' as user in common in MSSQL database.
can anyone show how the jdbc url syntax for including the schema in
MSSQL 2005 for the user sa ?
Thanks
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2007
Locally I develop in SQL server 2005 enterprise. Recently I recreated my db on the server of my hosting company (in sql server 2005 express).I basically recreated the tables and copied the data in it.I now receive the following error when I hit the DB:The 'System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider' requires a
database schema compatible with schema version '1'. However, the
current database schema is not compatible with this version. You may
need to either install a compatible schema with aspnet_regsql.exe
(available in the framework installation directory), or upgrade the
provider to a newer version.I heard something about running aspnet_regsql.exe, but I dont have that access to the DB. Also I dont know if this command does anything more than creating the membership tables and filling it with some default data...Any other solutions/thought on what this can be?Thanks!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2004
Hi All,
I had two Window NT 4.0 Server, say A and B... We recently upgraded from MS SQL Server 6.5 to MS SQL Server 2000 on Computer A, and for Computer B, I installed SQL Server 2000 from scratch. These two have a same RAM(512MB) and CPU speed...so the setup for hardware is almost identical...
For server A, there are around 10 connection to this SQL Server...
For server B, there are also around 10 connection to this SQL Server...
The database for SQL Server B is a copy from SQL Server A.... I restored the database on SQL Server B from the backup dump of Server A...
We have a store procedure called usp_GetMemo(ID Interger) ... we feed ID number to this store procedure and return its return Description... this table has ID column and it's Non-Cluster index, allow the duplicate row... there are 1.7 million records for this table...
Here is problem... whenever i execute more than 100 times for this store procedure(usp_GetMemo(ID)) continuously, the CPU usage of Computer A is 3 times bigger than computer B....
I did run the command "DBCC DBReindex" , "Update Statistics" for this table on computer A, but did not make any difference...
Keep in mind that Computer A has been upgraded to SQL server 2000 while Computer B installed from scratch... would that make difference somehow?? Before the upgrading, the CPU usage of computer A is the same as Computer B...
Any help will be really appreciated,
Thanks alot,
Kim,
View 7 Replies
View Related
