Scripting Service Broker Objects Using A Remote Connection
Mar 22, 2007
Hi
I have recently upgraded several of our SQL2005 servers to SP2a :) version 9.0.3050
and find that I can no longer script the Service Broker objects from a remote connection. The error I am getting is:
Script failed for MessageType 'MyMessageType' (Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
Additional Information
Either the object or one of its properties is not supported on the target server version
(Microsoft.SqlServer.Smo)
Now I know that this worked pre SP2 using exactly the same setup. Has anyone else experienced this or know how to fix it?
I'm looking for a tool or script that can wipe a database clean of any and all user configured service broker objects.
I've got two environments, Development and QA, that I need to have parallel service broker configurations. Each environment is hosted on a different set of servers. I need to make sure the Development environment looks exactly like the QA environment from a Service Broker perspective (other than the specific service broker instance references in the installed routes). I've got a script to build the objects that I want, but the Development environment is full of artifacts of abandoned experiments. Before running the creation script in Development, I'd like to start with a clean slate. Recreating the Development databases is not an option.
If a tool or script is not available, I know I need to adress at least the following object types, but I'm not sure if this list covers everything or in which order I need to drop which objects: routes, remote service bindings, certificates, database principals, tcp endpoints, services, queues, contracts, and message types
I was trying to send a message on a different instance in the network using service broker. I have created the endpoint and route both the side. I could see that the messages are in the transmission_queue in the sender side with no error in the status.
What could be the reason.
I am doing the following: CREATE ROUTE inst02 WITH SERVICE_NAME = 'SERVICE2', ADDRESS = 'tcp://10.14.43.149:2341'
in the send script i am using this: BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @dialog_handle FROM SERVICE [SERVICE1] TO SERVICE 'SERVICE2' ON CONTRACT [MainContract] WITH ENCRYPTION = OFF ;
in the sending side if i change the endpoint's authentication as windows kerberos , then i get thefollowing error in the transmission queue:
"Connection handshake failed. An OS call failed: (8009030e) 0x8009030e(No credentials are available in the security package). State 66."
I also have given access to the remote user on this endpoint(on the recever side) using this : GRANT CONNECT ON ENDPOINT::Endpoint_test to paras
I am executing the sending side send script using the same user wich has access to the remote endpoint.
How to prevent the hang on the initator service broker if the target service broker is not started?
Our case has two service brokers (two databases), sometime, the target is need to turn off. But the sitation is the initator service broker (in fact, the message is sent from triggers) become hang, I want to prevent this case and continue to operation, and the messages should queue and will continue to send to target service broker when it startup. How should I do?
I would appreciate any thoughts/ideas on the following use case for the distributed service broker application we plan to migrate from our existing proprietary tcp based message protocol using database tables for reliability.
There are two ssb services running in separate sql server instances, each on a different server machine. For simplicity, let us assume the ssb endpoint names are SSBA, SSBB. SSBB is the Initiator of the Dialog while SSBA is the Target. Now the requirement is that if the underlying network communication between the two ssb endpoints(SSBA and SSBB) is broken or if the critical service SSBB is down, then processing of any incoming message into SSBA's queue from a third service broker service (say SSBEXPR) running within a SqlExpress instance should be delayed until SSBB is alive and network communication between SSBA and SSBB is established. In our existing implementation (wherein SSBA, SSBB and SSBEXPR are windows services) we use a combination of TCP socket disconnects and Heartbeat messages between SSBA and SSBB to determine the health of network connection and that of the SSBB service.
Now my understanding of how the underlying network connection for a ssb dialog works is that if there is no activity on a dialog for a certain amount of time then the underlying network connection is closed. Is there a way to specify the amount of time to say infinite value or something and thus change this behavior? My other question is how can one query the underlying network connection (i.e. a row from sys.dm_broker_connections) associated with a particular conversation? If none of this is possible, then any other patterns/ideas/approach is welcome.
I have created an application using service broker.i have a source database which in a particular server say server A and want to send message to target database which is in another server say server B.
i have configured all the service broker objects and advanced service broker objects in correct way by reffering the site --http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/sindukuri/2797.asp
but when i am trying to send message from my source server to target server , i am getting the following error in sys.transmission_queue.
Connection attempt failed with error: '10061(No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.)'.
I have enabled the tcp port in both the server.
Note-My source server is an XP and Target Server is an windows server 2003.
can anybody please tell do i need to set any extra configuration in windows server 2003 or any thing do l need to do which i have left.
please do help!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thanks a lot in advance.....................................
Hello, I receive this error "The SQL Server Service Broker for the current database is not enabled, and as a result query notifications are not supported. Please enable the Service Broker for this database if you wish to use notifications." I attach the database in Management Studio to query and enable the broker using the scrip below but to no avail. ALTER DATABASE DataName SET ENABLE_BROKER ‘''<<------successfulandSELECT is_broker_enabled FROM sys.databases WHERE name = 'Database name' ‘'''<<-------value is 1 Global.asax ... Sub Application_Start(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As EventArgs) System.Data.SqlClient.SqlDependency.Start(ConfigurationManager.ConnectionStrings("dataConnectionString1").ConnectionString) End Sub...Web.config ... <connectionStrings> <add name="dataConnectionString1" connectionString="Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|jbp_data.mdf;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> <add name="ASPNETDBConnectionString" connectionString="Data Source=.SQLEXPRESS;AttachDbFilename=|DataDirectory|ASPNETDB.MDF;Integrated Security=True;User Instance=True" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient" /> </connectionStrings>... Hope you could help. cheers,imperialx
I am struggling with the position SSB could take in an SOA. If I would want a broker in the general sense, meaning an intermediary sitting between applications which exchange information through messaging, would SSB be a good candidate? I know Biztalk is probably the primary candidate, but in my scenario I would end up with Biztalk apps with empty orchestrations. Also, I think Biztalk is more expensive to manage. So I am looking for a lightweight broker for a simple SOA targeted at application interoperability, no fancy business processes in sight.
hi , i am creating a service broker application between two different instance.when i am initiating a dialog from the source my message remain in the sys.transmission_queue.but its transmission_status column is empty.
i attached the profiler with both source and target by including all the service broker event.
in my source profiler i am getting the error like -- Connection attempt failed with error: '10061(No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it.)'. with event Broker:connection
and in the target profiler error is --This message could not be delivered because the security context could not be retrieved. with event Broker:Message Undelivarible.
i have checked my port also using telnet with remotely and localy both working fine. i am using port no. 4001 and i have mentioned the port no. in the address of the route.
ok...this (going on eight years now) sql server user has a seeminglyvery simple problem with his new developers edition of sql server 2005.I'm trying to script multiple tables and indexes in the mmc...and usingthe usual control/shift keys to select multiple objects isn't working.Is this a bug in the mmc, or am I losing my mind or is there somethingI haven't yet seen in bol?thanks in advance...
As part of a simple maintenance package I am writing, the boss wants it to script out all objects from the database to a text file nightly (or better yet one file per object but that is not a requirement only a "nice to have"). I've been having a surprisingly difficult time determining how to do this.. its simple enough in SSMS but you can't schedule that :) Googling turns up a lot of people asking the same question with no real answers.. SSIS seems geared towards copying all objects to another DB - not just scripting them.
I am trying to send a message between to SQL Server 2005 instances on two different machines. I have checked all my routes and all my objects appear to be setup correctly. However, when running Profiler on the target machine, I receive the "This message has been dropped because the TO service could not be found. Service name: "[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]". Message origin: "Transport". This is my activated stored procedure that is sending the message to the target service. I am using certificate security. Any help appreciated....
CREATE PROCEDURE [usp_ProcessMessage]
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DECLARE @conversation_handle uniqueidentifier
DECLARE @message_body AS VARBINARY(MAX)
WHILE (1=1)
BEGIN
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
WAITFOR(RECEIVE TOP (1)
@conversation_handle = conversation_handle,
@message_body = message_body
FROM [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyQueue]
), TIMEOUT 1000;
IF (@@ROWCOUNT = 0)
BEGIN
COMMIT;
BREAK;
END
END CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
IF @message_body IS NOT NULL
BEGIN
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
FROM SERVICE [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyService]
TO SERVICE '[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]'
ON CONTRACT [tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyMessage/v1.0]
WITH ENCRYPTION = ON, LIFETIME = 600;
SEND ON CONVERSATION @conversation_handle
MESSAGE TYPE [tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/VisitMessage]
(@message_body);
END
COMMIT;
END
END
GO
My endpoints are created like so:
CREATE ENDPOINT MyEndpoint
STATE = STARTED
AS TCP
(
LISTENER_PORT = 4022
)
FOR SERVICE_BROKER (AUTHENTICATION = CERTIFICATE MasterCertificate)
GO
GRANT CONNECT TO CertOwner
GRANT CONNECT ON ENDPOINT::MyEndpoint TO CertOwner
GO
And my routes like so:
GRANT SEND ON SERVICE::[tcp://mydomain.com/INITIATE/MyService] TO CertOwner
GO
CREATE REMOTE SERVICE BINDING [MyCertificateBinding]
TO SERVICE '[tcp://mydomain.com/TARGET/MyService]'
i connect to remote Integration Service. i configure server for remote connection( on component services and DCOM config , ... ) .and now i can connect to Integration Service remotely and correctly.
but when i expand Stored Package and then click to expand MSDB this error will hapen:
login failed for user ... .(microsoft sql native client )
I run SS2005 from my XP x64 desktop. As a developer, I also run VMware (for other OSs and win versions). As a way to better maintain a good size pool of memory when needed, is it possible to script the various SS services (incl SSIS, SSRS and SSAS) in and out of memory as needed? Has anyone had experience with this? I'd rather have one script take care of this rather than having to go into the services app and manually stop and start services.
I am doing some research to see if the Service Broker technology would help my company with our Enterprise application. Here is our scenario: We have a 3 tier system. The first tier needs to contact the second tier asynchronously. Hence, using queues is a good option. However, the process that needs to happen on the second tier is mostly process intensive with little database updates. Is it still worth our time to use Service Broker?
I like the concept of Activation that Service Broker provides. But, from what I am reading most of the documentation describes activation as a way to call another stored proc. I definitely dont' want to do any process intensive work on the SQL server. So here comes my question...
How would I use a windows service to listen to the activation event from the Service Broker. I could have multiple windows services watching the same queue (scalable). Would I have to handle collisions myself? If so, I think I would rather keep it simple, and just use a simple table as my queue.
Hi to all, I want to study Sql server Service broker, have some questions1. What is the use of service broker ?2. Where this will use ? (With example)3. How to enable Service broker? Because i have sql server 2005 version but no folder like service broker.
Im having a hard time understanding everything required to create a simple Service Broker example. Can someone please assist? Source code would be ideal, but if not "do this, do that" would even be helpful.
I am trying to implement service broker. I send a message from my application code to the database to execute a specific stored procedure. How do i return the result set obtained by the execution of the stored procedure to the application.
My service broker seems to be broken... The database was restored from another crashed server but i have tried the
ALTER AUTHORIZATION ON DATABASE::[SPYDERONTHEWEB] TO [SA];
The error i'm getting is
Service Broker needs to access the master key in the database 'SpyderOnTheWeb'. Error code 25. The master key has to exist and th service master key encryption is required.
It will be great to have an update on MS plans to solve the problem of using Service Broker for remote users who sit behind the NAT. Any news will be appreciated.
Hello , I am trying to Implement distribution of the Stock Quotes over the LAN(only within the Network) and showing the live changing stock Quotes on the front end (in datagrid) installed at each clients desktop.I am receiving the Stock prices over the TCP / IP from the Stock Exchange. I am recieving atleast 10-15 messages per second over the TCP / IP from the Stock Exchange. Now i need to distribute this feed to Each connected client.
I tried doing it from TCP / IP , but in vein. Can we install the SQL 2005 Database Client Version on every client and use Service broker instaed of Live TCP / IP connections programmatically?
Ideally Can i dump the meesages from Stock Exchange in to each connected client's database locally and each front end application will keep a record of all the incomming messages.i.e Front end have a notification event , it will referesh the Datagrid in Front end accordingly...
Is it possible to develop Service Broker in .Net 1.1 (VS 2003)? Currently I have a project developed in .Net 1.1 and I want to add a new method utilize the message queue concept (instead of using MSMQ, using Service Broker SQL 2005), although my DB is SQL server 2005.
I am looking at the Service Broker as a way to notify multiple clients that there has been data changed on a table in the shared database. These clients may or may not be online. When there is a change, the notification should fire off a query to refresh the clients local cache. Is this a situation where Service Broker would help me? Can multiple clients recieve the notification at different times ( some recieve while online, some recieve when they come back online)? Any help on this would be appreciated. It seems from what I read that the messages are pulled off the queue when a notification has taken place. Is this correct? If so, can I set it to behave differently?
Let's assume the situation: we have Initiator and Target. Target is behind ISP's NAT and can't be published outside. So, when Initiator sends a message to Target, Target will not be able to establish a backward connection and will not send an acknowledge. Initiator will retry and retry...
I have tried the following, each runs successfully with no error, but nothing is in the queues, what can be the issue? CREATE MESSAGE TYPE SentMsgType VALIDATION = WELL_FORMED_XML;
CREATE CONTRACT MQContract (SentMsgType SENT BY ANY );
CREATE QUEUE SentQueue WITH STATUS=ON, RETENTION=OFF;
CREATE QUEUE ReceivedQueue WITH STATUS=ON, RETENTION=OFF;
CREATE SERVICE SentService ON QUEUE SentQueue (MQContract);
CREATE SERVICE ReceivedService ON QUEUE ReceivedQueue (MQContract);
SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON GO CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[insertTrigger] ON [dbo].[tblBBB] FOR INSERT AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; DECLARE @handle uniqueidentifier DECLARE @msgBody nvarchar(500)
select @msgBody = someString from inserted
BEGIN DIALOG CONVERSATION @handle FROM SERVICE SentService TO SERVICE 'ReceivedService', 'CURRENT DATABASE' ON CONTRACT MQContract;
--Sends a message SEND ON CONVERSATION @handle MESSAGE TYPE SentMsgType ('<message>' + @msgBody + '</message>') END CONVERSATION @handle WITH CLEANUP; END
SELECT * FROM SentQueue SELECT * FROM ReceivedQueue;
Can anyone let meknow how do i enable a service broker. I am trying to enable a service broker for an issuetracker application to get change of events in my database. When ever i try enabling it using the ALTER DATABASE [ databse] set Enable_Broker. it takes abt more that 2 hrs or more but doesnt show as enabled. Thanks in Advance, Pawan Venugopal
So SQLDependencies failed to do what I wanted them to do for my Cache Invalidating, so i'm going to humor another possibility for a half day - Triggers on my database table that communicate messages to my C# inside my ASP.NET App. Any advice on how to tap into a message queue with C#? I'm thinking that my messages could be 1 of about 100 different strings as far as what occurred on the Database Tables
We have a customer whos database just grows and grows. Not the customers own tables, but the:
sys.sysconvgroup sys.sysdesend sys.sysdercv
And these tables are linked to the Service Broker, and according to http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms179503.aspx these tables exists in every database and are used by the Service Broker.
Now to my questions =)
HOW do I delete rows from these tables? How come these tables hust grows and grows, could it be any setting in the SQL 2005 Server or is it the customer who has programmed his application wrong?
I'm in the process of doing the initial research for the architecture of a large scale, transactional messages routing platform.
My initial design called for a series of MSMQ queues and Windows Services, written in C#, to process the messages in these queues. There will be incoming and outgoing queues, queues to store unroutable messages, etc.
My application will be routing many hundreds of thousands (and eventually millions) of messages per day. These message are very small (< 200 bytes each) and must be routed very quickly. (<1 second processing overhead per message for high priority messages.)
Using the term "routing" may be a bit misleading. The messages arrive via TCP socket connections. I will just need to take in a message, examine its intended destination, and send it to one of several outgoing socket connections, likely on different machines. Some messages require higher priority routing than others, but I don't need multi-hop routing or anything like that.
Of great concern to me is that there are absolutely no single points of failure in the system. Because of this I was considering using a combination of MSMQ and Windows Services in a Clustered environment.
Can the Service Broker provide me with this kind of functionality? If so, how well does it perform and scale? Is it a better choice for messaging applications that require high transactional throughput than MSMQ?
I'm just trying to get an idea of what products/services I should look into further.
