Selecting Statement Execution
Jul 27, 2006
hi all, this morning i went mad trying to understand how to do something like this:
WHERE CASE @Variable1 WHEN 0 THEN T1.Field1 <= Value1 AND WHEN 1 THEN T1.Field1 >= Value2 AND WHEN NULL THEN T1.Field1 >= Value3 AND END T2.Field2=@Variable2 AND
so on
Can i select the statement that should be executed? i tried even inserting all the WHERE clausoles into 3 different IF, but he continues showing me errors...
Honestly i have to say that i'm pretti noob at SQL...
Thank U.
EDIT: I'm using SQL Server 2000
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 7, 2007
Hi Folks,
You can select all fields with:SELECT * FROM [TableName]
How do you select NOTHING or NONE with a SELECT statement?
Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2006
I have a column within a table with date like 25C1, 26B1, 345SS4, 432BRP5, ect........
I need the remove the numbers both front & back and leave only the letters.
Like C, B, SS, BRP...........
The letters will be in a new column.....
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2001
Hey all,
I trying to figure out if you can get a list of table names from a particular database by writing a single SQL statement.
E.G. In Oracle, from SQLPlus - you can say:
Select table_name from user_tables;
Is there anything like that SQL that I could run from Query Analyser to get a list of table names from a particular SQL Server database?
Thanks in advance,
Tommy
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2005
I want to run a query that returns say 100 records...but I only want to return first 10 for first page on a web page, then on page 2 the webpage will return rows 11 to 20 of the same SQL statement...page 3 returns rows 21 to 30 rows etc....(eg. like Google or bulletin boards, browsing auctions in ebay etc.).
I could probably get my application logic to handle this (ASP.net), for instance I could possibly get a datareader to skip the first 10, output the next 10 then stop for page 2 (records between 11 amnd 20) but is there way to do this in SQL Server at the database level using an SQL Statement?
I can use TOP 10 to get the first set of records for the first page eg.
SELECT TOP 10* FROM Suppliers
...but how do I get between 11 and 20, 21 and 30 and so on?
I've already mentioned I could handle this in my application logic, but then each time the same SQL Statement is fetching all 100 records, even though the web page will only display a certain range. I'm building an intranet website that can potentially run queries that return 100'000s records, even though initially only top 20 or so records are display, each page they subsequently go to will rerun that same query that returns all 100'000 records. So handling this as part of the query would be better for performancr I reckon.
Someone gave me the syntax..
SELECT *
FROM employees
LIMIT 10,10;
..but it didn't seem to work.
Thanks for any help!!
View 14 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2007
Hi,
Code Snippet
This is difficult to explain in words, but the following code outlines what I am trying to do:
with myTableWithRowNum as
(
select 'row' = row_number() over (order by insertdate desc), myValue
from
(
select table1Id As myValue from myTable1
union
select table2Id As myValue from myTable2
)
)
select * from myTableWithRowNum
Can anyone think of a work around so that I can use the Row_Number function where the data is coming from a union?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2007
When I try to execute the following statement:
END CONVERSATION DIALOG CONVERT(uniqueidentifier, '58C1A7AA-C0D7-DB11-B4C6-005056C00008')
using ICommand.Execute method, I got an error:
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'END'.
I use SQL Native Client as OLE DB Provider.
In profiler I can see that my statement becomes like this:
exec END CONVERSATION CONVERT(uniqueidentifier, '903586ED-C0D7-DB11-B4C6-005056C00008')
So provider add 'exec' before my statement, maybe because NCLI don't know such statetment and thinks that it is a stored procedure call with the name 'END'?
Is there is a way to avoid it except of using following construction:
exec sp_executesql N''END CONVERSATION ...
?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2014
Curious if I have the code below as an example and I execute this code does sql execute from top to bottom? And does the Update run and complete before the delete occurs? Or does SQL execute the update and delete in parallel?
UPDATE tbl1 SET col1 = 1
GO
DELETE FROM tbl1 where col2 = 2
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a trigger on a table. I am trying to dynamically log thechanged fields on the table to another table, so I am iteratingthrough the bits in COLUMNS_UPDATED() to find what's changed, andgetting the column name programatically. This is all working fine.If I do a regular insert command in my trigger then everything worksfine. However, since I want to retrieve data from the column namewhich I got programatically from the inserted and deleted tables (toget the old and new values) I wanted to do something like this:insert into auditTransactionLog (TableName,PrimaryKeyId,ColumnName,OldValue, NewValue, ActionType) EXEC( 'SELECT(''cmContactInfo''), I.contactID,'''+ @colname+''', D.'+@colname+',I.'+@colname+', '+@action+' FROM inserted I INNER JOIN Deleted D onI.ContactId = D.ContactId')The presence of this line of code appears to be preventing theupdating of the table with the trigger. Is there some reason why Ican't do the EXEC in the trigger? If I did it without EXEC it worksfine but I have no idea of getting at the D. and I. @colname columnsotherwise.Thanks for any help!Rebecca
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2006
I am cleaning up a large database table that has Date keys instead of real DateTimes. To do this, I am running the following query...
UPDATE MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F
SET MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F.OBS_DATE = MQIC.DBO.DATE_D.ACTUAL_DATE
FROM MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F INNER JOIN MQIC.DBO.DATE_D
ON MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F.DATE_KEY = MQIC.DBO.DATE_D.DATE_KEY
where Actual_Date is what is being stored, and the Date_Key is to be dropped.
The particulars are this -
Date_D table - 92,000 rows - 40 MB
Observation_F - 2,000,000 rows - 3.2 GB
This is being run on a remotedly hosted rack server with an AMD processor, 1 GB RAM, 60 GB harddisk space, 20 GB used.
SQL-Server 2005 Express - SP1
If I do the same query as a SELECT Statement,
UPDATE MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F
SELECT MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F.DATE_KEY, MQIC.DBO.DATE_D.ACTUAL_DATE
FROM MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F INNER JOIN MQIC.DBO.DATE_D
ON MQIC.DBO.OBSERVATION_F.DATE_KEY = MQIC.DBO.DATE_D.DATE_KEY
it runs to completion in about 15 min - during the entire time there is extensive used of CPU from Task Manager.
If I do the above statement, it seems to use lots of resources (50% +) for about 5 min, then falls to 5%. It just seems to sit there, for an hour + at which time I've killed the query.
This is actually the second time I tried this. The first time was on a different machine, with the P4, 3GB RAM, plenty of disk space, and using SQL-Server 2005 Standard - SP1. Exactly the same decrease in resources happened, and even though it ran several hours, no results.
Any thoughts here - not waiting long enough, memory leaks, etc.?
Thanks!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2014
I'm new to using SQL Server. I've been asked to optimize a series of scripts that queries over 4 millions records. I've managed to add indexes and remove a cursor, which increased performance. Now when I run the execution plan, the only query that cost is a DELETE statement from the main table. It shows a SORT which cost 71%. The table has 2 columns and a unique index. Here is the current index:
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Qry] ADD CONSTRAINT [Qry_PK] PRIMARY KEY NONCLUSTERED
(
[QryNum] ASC,
[ID] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = ON, SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ONLINE = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
Question: Will the SORT affect the overall performance? If so, is there anything I should change within the index that would speed up my query?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2007
I've got a big problem that I'm trying to figure out:
I have an address table out-of-which I am trying to select mailing addresses for companies UNLESS a mailing address doesn't exist; then I want to select the physical addresses for that company. If I get multiple mailing or physical addresses returned I only want the most recently edited out of those.
I don't need this for an individual ID select, I need it applied to every record from the table.
My address table has some columns that look like:
[AddressID] [int]
[LocationID] [int]
[Type] [nvarchar](10)
[Address] [varchar](50)
[City] [varchar](50)
[State] [char](2)
[Zip] [varchar](5)
[AddDate] [datetime]
[EditDate] [datetime]
AddressID is a primary-key non-null column to the address table and the LocationID is a foreign key value from a seperate Companies table.
So there will be multiple addresses to one LocationID, but each address will have it's own AddressID.
How can I do this efficiently with perfomance in mind???
Thank you in advance for any and all replies...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2007
We have a performance problem with a SQL statement (never completes) on one of our customer€™s sites. They are running SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition with SP2. The server is dual core with 3GB or RAM.
We requested a backup of the database and restored it to a SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition Server with SP2. The server has a single CPU with 2GB or RAM. However the exact same SQL (cut and paste) executes in approx 35 seconds.
We restored the backup of the customers database SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition with SP2. The server is dual core with 2GB or RAM. However as on eth customer site the SQL never completes.
So our question is why is this happening and is there a solution?
Our understanding is that the SQL Server 2005 engine is the same but Developer Edition (aka Enterprise Edition) has additional options.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2007
after moving off VS debugger and into management studio to exercise our SQLCLR sp, we notice that the 2nd execution gets an error suggesting that our static SqlCommand object is getting reused from the 1st execution (of the sp under mgt studio). If this is expected behavior, we have no problem limiting our statics to only completely reusable objects but would first like to know if this is expected? Is the fact that debugger doesnt show this behavior also expected?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 7, 2005
Hi I am slowly getting to grips with SQL Server. As a part of this, I have been attempting to work on producing more efficient queries. This post is regarding what appears to be a discrepancy between the SQL Server execution plan and the actual time taken by a query to run. My brief is to produce an attendance system for an education establishment (I presume you know I'm not an A-Level student completing a project :p ). Circa 1.5m rows per annum, testing with ~3m rows currently. College_Year could strictly be inferred from the AttDateTime however it is included as a field because it a part of just about every PK this table is ever likely to be linked to. Indexes are not fully optimised yet. Table:CREATE TABLE [dbo].[AttendanceDets] ([College_Year] [smallint] NOT NULL ,[Group_Code] [char] (12) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ,[Student_ID] [char] (8) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ,[Session_Date] [datetime] NOT NULL ,[Start_Time] [datetime] NOT NULL ,[Att_Code] [char] (1) COLLATE SQL_Latin1_General_CP1_CI_AS NOT NULL ) ON [PRIMARY]GO CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX [IX_AltPK_Clust_AttendanceDets] ON [dbo].[AttendanceDets]([College_Year], [Group_Code], [Student_ID], [Session_Date], [Att_Code]) ON [PRIMARY]GO CREATE INDEX [All] ON [dbo].[AttendanceDets]([College_Year], [Group_Code], [Student_ID], [Session_Date], [Start_Time], [Att_Code]) ON [PRIMARY]GO CREATE INDEX [IX_AttendanceDets] ON [dbo].[AttendanceDets]([Att_Code]) ON [PRIMARY]GOALL inserts are via an overnight sproc - data comes from a third party system. Group_Code is 12 chars (no more no less), student_ID 8 chars (no more no less). I have created a simple sproc. I am using this as a benchmark against which I am testing my options. I appreciate that this sproc is an inefficient jack of all trades - it has been designed as such so I can compare its performance to more specific sprocs and possibly some dynamic SQL. Sproc:CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[CAMsp_Att] @College_Year AS SmallInt,@Student_ID AS VarChar(8) = '________', @Group_Code AS VarChar(12) = '____________', @Start_Date AS DateTime = '1950/01/01', @End_Date as DateTime = '2020/01/01', @Att_Code AS VarChar(1) = '_' AS IF @Start_Date = '1950/01/01'SET @Start_Date = CAST(CAST(@College_Year AS Char(4)) + '/08/31' AS DateTime) IF @End_Date = '2020/01/01'SET @End_Date = CAST(CAST(@College_Year +1 AS Char(4)) + '/07/31' AS DateTime) SELECT College_Year, Group_Code, Student_ID, Session_Date, Start_Time, Att_Code FROM dbo.AttendanceDets WHERE College_Year = @College_YearAND Group_Code LIKE @Group_CodeAND Student_ID LIKE @Student_IDAND Session_Date <= @End_DateAND Session_Date >=@Start_DateAND Att_Code LIKE @Att_CodeGOMy confusion lies with running the below script with Show Execution Plan:--SET SHOWPLAN_TEXT ON--Go DECLARE @Time as DateTime Set @Time = GetDate() select College_Year, group_code, Student_ID, Session_Date, Start_Time, Att_Code from attendanceDetswhere College_Year = 2005 AND group_code LIKE '____________' AND Student_ID LIKE '________'AND Session_Date <= '2005-11-16' AND Session_Date >= '2005-11-16' AND Att_Code LIKE '_' Print 'First query took: ' + CAST(DATEDIFF(ms, @Time, GETDATE()) AS VarCHar(5)) + ' milli-Seconds' Set @Time = GetDate() EXEC CAMsp_Att @College_Year = 2005, @Start_Date = '2005-11-16', @End_Date = '2005-11-16' Print 'Second query took: ' + CAST(DATEDIFF(ms, @Time, GETDATE()) AS VarCHar(5)) + ' milli-Seconds'GO --SET SHOWPLAN_TEXT OFF--GOThe execution plan for the first query appears miles more costly than the sproc yet it is effectively the same query with no parameters. However, my understanding is the cached plan substitutes literals for parameters anyway. In any case - the first query cost is listed as 99.52% of the batch, the sproc 0.48% (comparing the IO, cpu costs etc support this). BUT the text output is:(10639 row(s) affected) First query took: 596 milli-Seconds (10639 row(s) affected) Second query took: 2856 milli-SecondsI appreciate that logical and physical performance are not one and the same but can why is there such a huge discrepancy between the two? They are tested on a dedicated test server, and repeated running and switching the order of the queries elicits the same results. Sample data can be provided if requested but I assumed it would not shed much light. BTW - I know that additional indexes can bring the plans and execution time closer together - my question is more about the concept. If you've made it this far - many thanks.If you can enlighten me - infinite thanks.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
Hello :
How to execute a procedure stored during execution of the report, that is before the poster the data.
Thnak you.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2004
Here's my case, I have written a stored procedure which will perform the following:
1. Grab data from a table using cursor,
2. Process data,
3. Write the result into another table
If I execute the stored procedure directly (thru VS.NET, or Query Analyser), it will run, but when I tried to execute it via a scheduled job, it fails.
I used the same record, same parameters, and the same statements to call the stored procedure.
Any idea?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2006
The benefit of the actual execution plan is that you can see the actual number of rows passing through each step - compared to the estimated number of rows.But what about the "cost percentages" ?I believe I've read somewhere that these percentages is still just an estimate and is not based on the real execution.Does anyone know this and preferable have a link to something that documents it?Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2006
A colleague of mine has a view that returns approx 100000 rows in about 60 seconds.
He wants to use the data returned from that view in an OLE DB Source component.
When he selects the view from the drop-down list of available tables then SSIS seems to hang without any data being returned (he waited for about 15 mins).
He then changed the OLE DB Source component to use a SQL statement and the SQL statement was: SELECT * FROM <viewname>
In this instance all the data was returned in approx 60 seconds (as expected).
This makes no sense. One would think that selecting a view from the drop-down and doing a SELECT *... from that view would be exactly the same. Evidently that isn't the case.
Can anyone explain why?
Thanks
-Jamie
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 1, 2007
Can I roll back certain query(insert/update) execution in one page if query (insert/update) in other page execution fails in asp.net.( I am using sqlserver 2000 as back end)
scenario
In a webpage1, I have insert query into master table and Page2 I have insert query to store data in sub table.
I need to rollback the insert command execution for sub table ,if insert command to master table in web page1 is failed. (Query in webpage2 executes first, then only the query in webpage1) Can I use System. Transaction to solve this? Thanks in advance
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 29, 2006
I am currently having this problem with gridview and detailview. When I drag either onto the page and set my select statement to pick from one table and then update that data through the gridview (lets say), the update works perfectly. My problem is that the table I am pulling data from is mainly foreign keys. So in order to hide the number values of the foreign keys, I select the string value columns from the tables that contain the primary keys. I then use INNER JOIN in my SELECT so that I only get the data that pertains to the user I am looking to list and edit. I run the "test query" and everything I need shows up as I want it. I then go back to the gridview and change the fields which are foreign keys to templates. When I edit the templates I bind the field that contains the string value of the given foreign key to the template. This works great, because now the user will see string representation instead of the ID numbers that coinside with the string value. So I run my webpage and everything show up as I want it to, all the data is correct and I get no errors. I then click edit (as I have checked the "enable editing" box) and the gridview changes to edit mode. I make my changes and then select "update." When the page refreshes, and the gridview returns, the data is not updated and the original data is shown. I am sorry for so much typing, but I want to be as clear as possible with what I am doing. The only thing I can see being the issue is that when I setup my SELECT and FROM to contain fields from multiple tables, the UPDATE then does not work. When I remove all of my JOIN's and go back to foreign keys and one table the update works again. Below is what I have for my SQL statements:------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SELECT:SELECT People.FirstName, People.LastName, People.FullName, People.PropertyID, People.InviteTypeID, People.RSVP, People.Wheelchair, Property.[House/Day Hab], InviteType.InviteTypeName FROM (InviteType INNER JOIN (Property INNER JOIN People ON Property.PropertyID = People.PropertyID) ON InviteType.InviteTypeID = People.InviteTypeID) WHERE (People.PersonID = ?)UPDATE:UPDATE [People] SET [FirstName] = ?, [LastName] = ?, [FullName] = ?, [PropertyID] = ?, [InviteTypeID] = ?, [RSVP] = ?, [Wheelchair] = ? WHERE [PersonID] = ? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The only fields I want to update are in [People]. My WHERE is based on a control that I use to select a person from a drop down list. If I run the test query for the update while setting up my data source the query will update the record in the database. It is when I try to make the update from the gridview that the data is not changed. If anything is not clear please let me know and I will clarify as much as I can. This is my first project using ASP and working with databases so I am completely learning as I go. I took some database courses in college but I have never interacted with them with a web based front end. Any help will be greatly appreciated.Thank you in advance for any time, help, and/or advice you can give.Brian
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2015
Ok I have a query "SELECT ColumnNames FROM tbl1" let's say the values returned are "age,sex,race".
Now I want to be able to create an "update" statement like "UPATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race" dynamically and execute this UPDATE statement. So, if the next select statement returns "age, sex, race, gender" then the script should create "UPDATE tbl2 SET Col2 = age + sex + race + gender" and execute it.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
hiI need to write a stored procedure that takes input parameters,andaccording to these parameters the retrieved fields in a selectstatement are chosen.what i need to know is how to make the fields of the select statementconditional,taking in consideration that it is more than one fieldaddedfor exampleSQLStmt="select"if param1 thenSQLStmt=SQLStmt+ field1end ifif param2 thenSQLStmt=SQLStmt+ field2end if
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2007
Hi guys,
I have the query below (running okay):
Code Block
SELECT DISTINCT Field01 AS 'Field01', Field02 AS 'Field02'
FROM myTables
WHERE Conditions are true
ORDER BY Field01
The results are just as I need:
Field01 Field02
------------- ----------------------
192473 8461760
192474 22810
Because other reasons. I need to modify that query to:
Code Block
SELECT DISTINCT Field01 AS 'Field01', Field02 AS 'Field02'
INTO AuxiliaryTable
FROM myTables
WHERE Conditions are true
ORDER BY Field01
SELECT DISTINCT [Field02] FROM AuxTable
The the results are:
Field02
----------------------
22810
8461760
And what I need is (without showing any other field):
Field02
----------------------
8461760
22810
Is there any good suggestion?
Thanks in advance for any help,
Aldo.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2015
I've have a need with SQL Server 2005 (so I've no MERGE statement), I have to merge 2 tables, the target table has 10 fields, the first 4 are the clustered index and primary key, the source table has the same fields and index.Since I can't use the MERGE statement (I'm in SQL 2005) I have to make a double step operation, and INSERT and an UPDATE, I can't figure how to design the WHERE condition for the insert statement.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2004
Hi,
I am trying to select all entries from a database apart from the top/latest entry, via a stored procedure.
Below is the code that i have but i am doing it wrong somehow.
Any ideas?
Thanks
CREATE PROCEDURE spNEWSARCHIVE AS
SELECT *
FROM tblNEWS
WHERE NewsID NOT TOP 1
ORDER BY NewsID DESC
GO
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 14, 2006
Hi,I have the following set and would like to select all rows that havemin value of column 4 for a given column 1 and 2 group, irrespective ofcolumn 3, as below:C1 C2 C3 C4---------------------A B x 5A B y 10A BB XX 55A BB YY 11AA CC z 1AA CC zz 11Need---A B x 5A BB YY 11AA CC z 1using sql server 2000 (which does not provide rank or partition by)Thanks in advance,Tamas
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 13, 2014
i was tasked to created an UPDATE statement for 6 tables , i would like to update 4 columns within the 6 tables , they all contains the same column names. the table gets its information from the source table, however the data that is transferd to the 6 tables are sometimes incorrect , i need to write a UPDATE statement that will automatically correct the data. the Update statement should also contact a where clause
the columns are [No] , [Salesperson Code], [Country Code] and [Country Name]
i was thinking of doing
Update [tablename]
SET [No] =
CASE
WHEN [No] ='AF01' THEN 'Country Code' = 'ZA7' AND 'Country Name' = 'South Africa'
ELSE 'Null'
END
What is the best way to script this
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 4, 2006
Hello friends,
I want to use select statement in a CASE inside procedure.
can I do it? of yes then how can i do it ?
following part of the procedure clears my requirement.
SELECT E.EmployeeID,
CASE E.EmployeeType
WHEN 1 THEN
select * from Tbl1
WHEN 2 THEN
select * from Tbl2
WHEN 3 THEN
select * from Tbl3
END
FROM EMPLOYEE E
can any one help me in this?
please give me a sample query.
Thanks and Regards,
Kiran Suthar
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2015
I am attempting to run update statements within a SELECT CASE statement.
Select case x.field
WHEN 'XXX' THEN
 UPDATE TABLE1
  SET TABLE1.FIELD2 = 1
 ELSE
  UPDATE TABLE2
  SET TABLE2.FIELD1 = 2
END
FROM OuterTable x
I get incorrect syntax near the keyword 'update'.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2006
Hello,I have a gridview bound to a sqldatasource control. I have an emptydatatemplate setup. In the selecting event, I make sure that an actual select has been performed (and not on null data); however, I have cancelselectonnullparameters set to true to stop it, because initially it will be null.However, the selecting event runs, even when I cancel it, the emptydatatemplate shows up. How do I prevent that from occuring?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2007
Dear All,
I need to select records between two datetimes.
My Database Structure and sample values are as below
Fromdate ToDate
2007-02-20 09:00:00.000 2007-02-20 12:00:00.0002007-02-20 08:00:00.000 2007-02-20 12:00:00.0002007-02-20 06:00:00.000 2007-02-20 13:00:00.000
Query i used
select * from tablename where ((fromdate between Convert(datetime,'2007-19-2 10:00',103) and Convert(datetime,'2007-19-2 11:00',103)) or (todate between Convert(datetime,'2007-19-2 10:00',103) and Convert(datetime,'2007-19-2 11:00',103)))
My query is not returning values when i am querying between '2007-19-2 10:00' and '2007-19-2 11:00'
Please help
Thanks
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2007
Hi, This is quite an obvious problem, but for some reason I can't think through the solution. I have two columns, a datetime (datecreated) and an id (FK) othertableid (id)what I would like to be able to do is select a list of id and datecreated, but only chose the latest row for each id.So I guess it's a bit like a distinct on the id column, but ensuring the date returned is the top date. Please help
View 1 Replies
View Related
