Serializable Transactions And Insert.

Jul 23, 2005

Hi,

I have a problem using serializable transactions. In one transaction I
select a single specific row from a table using a where clause (this
causes it to acquire and hold a range lock). In another transaction I
attempt to insert a new row into the table (which does not match the
first transactions where clause), but it is blocked by the first
transaction. The reading I have done on SQL Server suggests that I
should be able to insert rows, as long as the new rows do not match the
where clause in the other transactions select.

Here is what I do:

Transaction 1
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL Serializable
BEGIN TRANSACTION
select * from test_table where id=1;

and then on another session I run
Transaction 2

SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL Serializable
BEGIN TRANSACTION
insert into test_table values (2, 'two');

Transaction 2 cannot complete until transaction 1 has finished. I have
tried using WITH (ROWLOCK) hints but to no avail. Am I missing
something important? Is this true of other DBs?

(I am able to update rows that are not in transaction 1's where clause)

I am using SQL Server version 8.00.760(SP3).

Thanks for your help,

Magnus.

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

SERIALIZABLE TRANSACTION Getting Blocked?

Jun 10, 2004

Hi guys,

I have a stored procedure which generates the next sequence number...
it uses SERIALIZABLE Option. procs look something like below..

begin
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION

Sequence generating statement...

COMMIT TRANSACTION
set @NextSequenceValue = @NextSequenceValue
Return @NextSequenceValue
end

For some reason when i call the proc with below parameters to get next sequence number.. its hungs up..


declare @NextSequenceValue int
set @NextSequenceValue = 0
exec spGetNextSequence 19, 'LotSequence', @NextSequenceValue output, Null
select @NextSequenceValue as NextSequenceValue


When i queried sp_who2 it shows that my processid is blocked by some other processid.. and when i do DBCC INPUTBUFFER (blockingprocessid), the query of blocking processid and my nextsequence generation stored proc is not realted at all..

Can you help shed some light on why my nextsequence generating proc is getting hunged...?

help is appericated..

View 4 Replies View Related

Isolation Level Serializable

Jul 4, 2005

Hi all,
can anyone give me more information on
set transaction isolation level serializable ?? I want to prove some lock to use on online insert and update.
Thank you every much.

View 14 Replies View Related

SERIALIZABLE Locks Inside A Trigger?

Oct 25, 2001

I have an insert trigger which has to insert new records into 2 other databases. The first thing it has to do is get a maxid from a table in each of the databases before the insert. i was going to use a SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE statment before getting the ID and then do my insert. My question is two-fold, first is this the best way to do it. And since I have 2 separate selects to get the 2 maxids in the other 2 databases and tables, do I need 2 of these statements inside the trigger, before each insert, or a separate one for each select?
Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

Serializable Read And Lock Mode

Jul 20, 2005

Hi,Version Info: SQLSERVER 2000 SP3I am trying to understand how SQL Server works with SERIALIZABLE read.I am fairly new to SQL Server, having mainly worked with Informix.We are getting lock timeout error in our application. Our lock timeoutis set to 20 seconds. I am trying to investigate why locks are held forsuch a long time in the first place.I believe SQLServer tries to put keylocks as much as possible forensuring serializibility. For e.g.SELECT column_bfrom table_awhere column_c between 1000 and 1100what if column_c has no index. Does it switch over the data row.And what if a table has no index. Will it go for table lock, as ituse to do in earlier versions.TIA.--email id is bogus

View 3 Replies View Related

SQL Server 2005 JDBC Driver V1.2: StreamError Not Serializable

Jan 11, 2008

I'm encountering a problem that seems to be due to the StreamError class not being serializable. This was raised on the JDBC Driver Team blog by Jonas on 10/24/2007. Jimmy Wu notes on 10/29/2007 that it is under investigation. Any progress?

http://blogs.msdn.com/jdbcteam/archive/2007/10/12/microsoft-sql-server-2005-jdbc-driver-v1-2-official-release.aspx#comments

Thanks,
Mike

View 2 Replies View Related

Changing Connection Transactions To Database Transactions

May 22, 2005

Hi there,
I have decided to move all my transaction handling from asp.net to stored procedures in a SQL Server 2000 database. I know the database is capable of rolling back the transactions just like myTransaction.Rollback() in asp.net. But what about exceptions? In asp.net, I am used to doing the following:
<code>Try   'execute commands   myTransaction.Commit()Catch ex As Exception   Response.Write(ex.Message)   myTransaction.Rollback()End Try</code>Will the database inform me of any exceptions (and their messages)? Do I need to put anything explicit in my stored procedure other than rollback transaction?
Any help is greatly appreciated

View 3 Replies View Related

Transactions

Aug 13, 2003

Hi All,
Can anybody suggest me a website where I can find articles on Managing transactions with Sql server. Also a scenario where the transactions take place in a environment involving 2 different databases, Like the bank account and credit card transactions (specifically of 2 way kind)
Thanks

View 5 Replies View Related

Transactions

Apr 6, 2005

I have a web application with a shopping cart, how do I stop all the shopping cart transaction from going into the db log? Is this possible?  These are are only transient data movements, and will never be need to to restore to, and they are cause log bloat. Or is there a better way to stop log bloat?
 
Thanks

View 2 Replies View Related

TRANSACTIONS IN DTS

Apr 17, 2000

Hi All,

How can we change connection properties in a DTS pkg with connection?
You can loop through the connection count but the connection ID is not static one.So can’t rely on that.
Is there another way of changing connection properties?

Thanks in Advance

Barath

View 4 Replies View Related

Help With DTS Transactions

Sep 5, 2000

Hi all....

I am currently designing a DTS Package to import data that is processed daily into a large database.

I have to design the package such that if any step fails when importing, I roll back the entire transaction.

I have designed the package with this in mind, checked "join transaction if present" and "rollback transaction on failure" in all of the workflows. I have also made all workflows serialized.

However, when I run the package, it fails on one of the data pumps with the error:

Transaction context in use by another session.

Any ideas?

Thank you,

Brian

View 2 Replies View Related

I Want To See My Transactions

Dec 1, 2000

I am replicating (finally!!) and on my publishers agent history I can see it says xx transactions with xx commands were delivered. (xx being the number)
Where can I look to see what the transactions or commands are?

Is there a place the system stores this information?

View 1 Replies View Related

Max. Transactions

Oct 17, 2003

what is maximum limit of no. of transactions per sec. in sql server 2000

View 2 Replies View Related

Transactions

Sep 6, 2004

Is there a point to wrapping a single UPDATE or INSERT statement in an explicit TRANSACTION:


BEGIN TRANSACTION

INSERT INTO Table (...) VALUES (...)

COMMIT TRANSACTION


I understand ACID and concept of transactions. However, I thought they were only necessary for multi-statement operations. I'm maintaining code that does this and am wondering if this is necessary. Does SQL Server guarantee ACID for single statements? Are single UPDATE/INSERT statements prone to race condition like affects without using explicit transactions?

View 2 Replies View Related

Transactions

Apr 17, 2008

Are there any scenarios where an un-commited transaction would block further queries?

View 1 Replies View Related

Transactions

May 27, 2008

If you run the Begin Transaction code and then run a create such as an update query and you see that it effects the number of rows that you wanted it to effect is there a way to look at the actual data that changed before you Commit Transaction?

Thanks!

View 7 Replies View Related

Transactions/Sec

Jul 1, 2007

I have a table with around 240 columns and one of the column in the Table is the Inserttime ( DATETIME ) and I using a GETDATE() function in the stored Proc, when we insert data into the table. In the same Milli second 2007-06-27 09:32:58.303 , I have around 7600 records in the database. The Stored Proc is called for each Individual record and we don't bunch the transactions. Is this possible.

I did some bench marking on this server and I can insert only 700 - 800 records approx / sec on this particular table.

Thanks

View 6 Replies View Related

Transactions

Aug 1, 2007

I have a small database that I have been testing.I get an error about a transaction deadlock.The code is in stored procedures and I added transactions to the sp'sbut the error happened again.I wrapped the whole sp in just one transaction and I don't have anyindex on the tables.When I test just by running a program that sends 3 calls at a time itwill get a deadlocked transaction as I send 6 or 9 at a time.I am not sure how it can have a deadlocked transaction after I usedtransactions(begin and commit) in the sp's.Steve

View 4 Replies View Related

Transactions

Oct 8, 2007

I am working with transactions and use try catch to capture errors and in the event of an error i have to rollback the transaction. How can i perform this?, most of the errors which i forsee are either insertion of null values into non nullable columns or violation of Primary keys while inserting duplicates.
I started by coding the following way but it does not rollaback apparently the try catch does not work for above kind of errors..Can somebody help..



DECLARE @REPORTING_PERIOD VARCHAR(6)

BEGIN TRY

BEGIN TRANSACTION

-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from

-- interfering with SELECT statements.

SET NOCOUNT ON;

SET @REPORTING_PERIOD =(Select REPORT_PERIOD_ID from dbo.T_REPORT_PERIOD where C_FLAG_ACTIVITY=1)


--Step 1


INSERT INTO [dbo].[T_COUNTRIES]

([C_COUNTRY]

,[LB_COUNTRY]

,[C_REGION]

,[FK_REPORTING_PERIOD])

SELECT [C_COUNTRY]

,[LB_COUNTRY]

,[C_REGION]

,@REPORTING_PERIOD

FROM [dbo].[IN_T_COUNTRIES]


--Step 2


INSERT INTO [dbo].[T_FLE]

([FK_P_FLE]

,[C_COSMOS]

,[LB_FLE]

,[C_PARETO]

,[C_OPCO_SCOPE]

,[C_LEVEL]

,[C_FLE_TYPE]

,[C_ACTIVITY]

,[F_MATERIAL]

,[C_MATERIAL_PRIORITY]

,[C_CALCULATION_METHOD]

,[F_CREDIT_RISK_MATERIALITY]

,[V_PARTICIPATION]

,[FK_REPORTING_PERIOD])

SELECT Null as [FK_P_FLE]

,[C_COSMOS]

,[LB_FLE]

,[C_PARETO]

,[C_OPCO_SCOPE]

,[C_LEVEL]

,[C_FLE_TYPE]

,@REPORTING_PERIOD

FROM [dbo].[IN_T_FLE]

COMMIT TRANSACTION


END TRY


BEGIN CATCH


SELECT

ERROR_NUMBER() as ErrorNumber,

ERROR_LINE() as ErrorLine,

ERROR_MESSAGE() as ErrorMessage;

-- Test XACT_STATE for 1 or -1.

-- XACT_STATE = 0 means there is no transaction and

-- a commit or rollback operation would generate an error.

-- Test whether the transaction is uncommittable.

IF (XACT_STATE()) = -1

BEGIN

PRINT

N'The transaction is in an uncommittable state. ' +

'Rolling back transaction.'

ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;

END;

-- Test whether the transaction is active and valid.

IF (XACT_STATE()) = 1

BEGIN

PRINT

N'The transaction is committable. ' +

'Committing transaction.'

COMMIT TRANSACTION;

END;





END CATCH;


View 3 Replies View Related

Sql Transactions

Nov 8, 2006

Hello All,

When i am working with Transactions i got one doubt.

If i am inserting any records into a table with primary key if a transaction is rolled back i am finding one primary ID is missing. Is it so.

View 3 Replies View Related

Transactions

Apr 2, 2007

I've been searching around and haven't found anything that simply states what I want to know.



I want to use a transaction within my CLR Stored Proc, to do so I've got System.Transactions referenced and I can access the current transaction via Transaction.Current.



My questions are

Will there always be a current transaction?

Do I need to create a new transaction if one doesn't already exist?

View 3 Replies View Related

Transactions In SQL CE 2.0 And CF1.1

Sep 4, 2006

Hi world:

I have this issue:

I need to push rows from CE to SQL Server 2000 and after delete these rows of CE database only if all rows have been sent to SQL Server 2000.

I think the best is work with transactions. Since I know I can use transactions for this purpose, can anybody give me a link with push transaction examples ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Transactions/sec

Dec 17, 2007

Hi all,

What does "Transactions/sec" counter in SQL 2005 under databases do in terms of performance. My counter shows almost 100% all the time in 4 terrbyte DB in superdome with many CPUs.


Which is the optimal value for this counter?

thanks in advance

Priw

View 1 Replies View Related

Using Transactions

Mar 31, 2008

Hi,

I am using C#.NET 2005, SQL Server 2000.

I have a few questions to ask. Firstly, can anybody help me by telling the difference between the code below and the same code with comments removed:

string localquery = "select bla bla"; SqlDataAdapter _sda; DataTable _dt; SqlCommand _cmd; bool isErrCatched = false; Exception ExcToThrow = new Exception(); using (SqlConnection _cn = NewConnection) // NewConnection returns a static SQLConnection object { _cn.Open(); _cmd = new SqlCommand(localquery, _cn); //SqlTransaction myTrans; //myTrans = _cn.BeginTransaction(); //_cmd.Transaction = myTrans; _dt = new DataTable(); _sda = new SqlDataAdapter(_cmd); try { _sda.Fill(_dt); _sda.Dispose(); //myTrans.Commit(); } catch (Exception exc) { //try { myTrans.Rollback(); } catch {} isErrCatched = true; ExcToThrow = exc; } finally { _cn.Close(); } _cmd.Dispose(); } _cmd = null; if (isErrCatched) throw ExcToThrow; return _dt;


My first question: Can there be a performance loss if I uncomment the lines about transaction usage? I mean, when I do this I start to get more timeouts.

My problem goes on. When I comment those lines and run a stress tool, I am getting "column X does not belong to table Y" errors. If those lines are not commented i am not getting this error, but I get timeout errors frequently. So, my second question: is there something wrong in my query or is there a bad coding practice I am following? Could someone offer a better and more robust sample for this code block?

By the way, connection pooling is on. And these errors are observed under high loads.

Thanks everybody.

View 3 Replies View Related

Transactions

Jun 7, 2006

I have transaction that will run on an hourly bases. I need to make sure that no one will start this transaction while it is running. I just need to know the system table that has all the transaction names in them and check to see if the transaction is running or not. what i am trying to do is not to have locks....just wanting to make sure that no one would run the same transaction twice. does anyone have any idea on how we can do this?

View 7 Replies View Related

Transactions

Mar 11, 2008


If you ask a .net developer he would likely say that he uses System.Transactions to manage transactions, a DBA on the other hand places transactions within the T-SQL of stored procedures.

What rules do architects and others, use when determining if the transactions should be placed in:


.net Middle Tier Components using System.Transactions for example.

T-SQL Stored Procedures.

Both .net Middle Tier Components and T-SQL Stored Procedures.
Thanks in advance,

Doug Holland

View 1 Replies View Related

Transactions And Exceptions

Nov 1, 2006

if i have a loop that runs through records in a dataset like thisfor(int i=0;i<ds.Tables[0].Rows.Count;++i) and in this loop i have several sql commands that run as a transaction in a try / catch block like : try{ // do stuff}catch{    trans.RollBack();}how can i keep the loop going even if a transaction failed.  So the transaction works for each individual row.  if row 100 fails for whatever i would like the loop to continue running, do i just simply remove the "throw" and it will continue looping ? my catch block currently looks like catch(Exception ex){transaction.Rollback();activity.Log("Transaction aborted, rolling back. Error Message: " + ex.Message + " Stack Trace: " + ex.StackTrace.ToString());throw; }thanks,mcm

View 4 Replies View Related

Transactions And MSDTC

Nov 3, 2006

I have a class that use a TransactionScope object for make make two operations into a database. The problem is that in a computer works well but in another I receive a error message: "MSDTC is not running in .SQLEXPRESS". I had watched the services in the computer and the "Microsoft Distributed Transaction Coordinator" is running.
Does somebody know what is happening?
Thankyou and sorry for my English.

View 2 Replies View Related

Transactions In Sql Server

May 9, 2007

I am using ADO.Net for data access and was wondering if anyone knows a good resource for information of sql transactions? Also, do you know if the ForEach statement can be made in sql transactions?

View 3 Replies View Related

DataSet And Transactions...

May 14, 2007

hi all,
i'm developing a WebApplication with VisualStudio2005 (with C# code).i've defined a DataSet with some TableAdatpter. For each TableAdapter, i've definet some "customized" commands, performing specialized operations over the table on DB. (db is SqlServer2000).For each TableAdapter, i've set as "public" the connection, so that i can use it within my code for beginning a new transaction. Now, how can i set that transaction, to the specialized commands I defined for each TableAdapter?
Thanks all.Andrea.

View 1 Replies View Related

Ending Transactions

Feb 2, 2008

Hi Guys,
Im having trouble stopping a transaction once the result on one or more of my sql statements rolls back the transaction. Take a look at one my first 'IF' statement (below).  If the parameter '@Return' is 'False' i want the transaction rolleback and all sql execution to stop. But my problem is the rest of the sql gets executed and i end up getting rubbish data. Im still new to transactions so i think im doing something really wrong. Please take a look at my sql and help me out in what ever way you think is best. thanks in advance.
MattBEGIN TRY
SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE
BEGIN TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
DECLARE @Return BIT;
SELECT @Return = (SELECT IsReturnable FROM INVENTORY WHERE InventoryID = 6)
IF (@Return = 'False') ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
DECLARE @Already_In INT;
SELECT @Already_In = (SELECT ReturnedBy FROM InventoryInUse WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375))
IF (@Already_In IS NOT NULL) ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
DECLARE @Outstanding As INT;
SELECT @Outstanding = (SELECT (QtyTaken - 40) AS Outstanding FROM InventoryInUse WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375));
DECLARE @OutstandingReason As VARCHAR(200);
DECLARE @Get_Person_ID INT;
Select @Get_Person_ID = (SELECT PersonID From [User] WHERE Username = 'matthewsk');
IF (@Outstanding < 0) ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
ELSE IF (@Outstanding > 0)BEGIN
IF (@OutstandingReason = '') SELECT @RollBack = @RollBack + 1;
UPDATE InventoryInUse SET ReturnedBy = @Get_Person_ID, ReturnDate = GETDATE(), QtyReturned = 40, QtyOutstanding = @Outstanding, WriteOffReason = 'Testing This' WHERE (CheckOutNumber = 375);
UPDATE Inventory SET TotalQty = TotalQty - @Outstanding, QuantityInUse = QuantityInUse - (40 + @Outstanding) WHERE InventoryID = 6;
END;ELSE IF (@Outstanding = 0)
BEGIN
UPDATE InventoryInUse SET ReturnedBy = @Get_Person_ID, ReturnDate = GETDATE(), QtyReturned = 50 WHERE CheckOutNumber = 375;
UPDATE Inventory SET QuantityInUse = QuantityInUse - 50 WHERE InventoryID = 6;
END;
COMMIT TRANSACTION;
END;END TRY
BEGIN CATCH IF (XACT_STATE()) = -1
BEGIN ROLLBACK TRANSACTION;
 
END;
END CATCH;
 

View 3 Replies View Related

Testing Transactions

May 21, 2008

I am using SqlServer 2005  Express Edition.  I have written a  stored procedure that has a transaction to make sure that it rolls back in case of failure.  Is there a way to test that the transaction works. I don't now how to cause an error that would cause the transaction to roll back and raise the error with the details of the exception.
 Thanks,
laura

View 2 Replies View Related

Transactions In C# Code.

Jan 9, 2004

I have a form that calls three separate queries to insert its contents in my database. The first query runs once and returns an identity value back to the calling code. Using this ID, it runs a foreach() on the selected items of two listboxes; running multiple inserts for each.

I want to group all of those inserts into a transaction that will rollback if any insert fails. I'm familiar with doing this in a stored procedure, but since this is a case where I can't use a single sproc I'm not sure exactly how.

I've been stumbling through using a SqlTransaction object and handling it from my code, but I can't seem to find much information on doing this. Any examples of a multiple query transaction using the SqlTransaction object would be very helpful.

View 6 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved