Hi all,
is there a way to set timeout in a stored procedure?? I'm running a stored procedure but 10% of the time it will time out and when I say retry it works just fine. I'm wondering if I set the timeout large enough it won't run into that error.
I'd like to know what would be the best way to avoid it AND how to set timeout in stored procedures..
thanks guys!!
I've been researching this problem for weeks and I haven't gotten very far with it so I was hoping to get some help here.
Here's the error information we get:
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. ---> System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding.
This particular error comes from a .net application, but we've seen similar "query timeout errors" from a vb6 application roughly 6 months ago.
Here are the facts we've narrowed down:
1) The timeout happens at seemingly random times (very sporadic).
2) It's currently only happening on a few stored procedures (if requested, I'll provide one of the stored procedures, but it's basically a complex search procedure).
3) To resolve the timeout error, we've found 2 temporary solutions:
A) have all clients exit the program thus closing all active connections (less than 10 connection in a 4-5 user setup)
B) I run the following script when the timeout occurs and then the stored procedure runs smoothly:
Code Block
sp_configure 'remote query timeout', 0
reconfigure with override
sp_configure 'remote query timeout', 600
reconfigure with override
4) Running the stored procedure from our application and from SQL Management studio express, is the same, except management studio doesn't time out and actually runs as long as it takes (roughly 1 minute 20 seconds or under 1 second after the script above runs).
We're pretty stumpted and it's happened at 5 different client sites with little in common. One of our sites is even running SQL express off the workstation with nothing else running and it still occurs.
I'm open to trying practically anything at this point, but unfortuntenly we have not been able to reproduce this behavior in our testing enviroment so I can't give much information for others to reproduce.
Thanks in advance!
Hi all,
This is a problem for that I lost a weekend to reach to this conclusions:
Here is the scenario:
I need a file downloaded from a FTP server on my SQL 2005 DB Server to process it in several ways. This file is tens of MBs (let's say 50MB). I set up a CLR stored procedure to bring it locally on the machine.
Inside this procedure, call it getFtpFile, I use the FtpWebRequest to issue the commands I need to the FTP server (get the file size and download the file). For reading and writing I use a StreamReader sr and a StreamWriter. sw
I read the remote file in block with:
sr.ReadBlock(buf, 0, blockSizeBytes);
Everything work file until the last block that, most probably will not be of size blockSizeBytes, but smaller. So, what happens is that when I read this last block there is an exception raised from the call saying:
The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a receive.
This happens only if:
-> the code runs inside SQL (calling the SP) (it runs perfect on normal tet environment where I have another executable and call the getFtpFile method in the CLR dll);
-> 100 seconds (100000 miliseconds) (exactly) have passed (small files do not experiencing this problem)
I thought the reader writer scheme is not perfect and implemented again with a simple FileStream.WriteByte(response.GetResponseStream().Read());
This approach, even if very slow, still has the problem after 100 seconds, in a CLR SQL environment, when it reads the at the last character.
I have used all the combinations of KeepAlive and response.Closose(). Problems still there.
Conclusion: There must be a 100 seconds timeout that immediately after my last byte has been received, closes the connection and the stream of the response crashes during this last call.
Thank you all for the help!
I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies View RelatedHi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
Using SQL 2005, SP2. All of a sudden, whenever I create any stored procedures in the master database, they get created as system stored procedures. Doesn't matter what I name them, and what they do.
For example, even this simple little guy:
CREATE PROCEDURE BOB
AS
PRINT 'BOB'
GO
Gets created as a system stored procedure.
Any ideas what would cause that and/or how to fix it?
Thanks,
Jason
How do I search for and print all stored procedure names in a particular database? I can use the following query to search and print out all table names in a database. I just need to figure out how to modify the code below to search for stored procedure names. Can anyone help me out?
SELECT TABLE_SCHEMA + '.' + TABLE_NAME
FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_TYPE = 'BASE TABLE'
Hello,
I have to transfer lets say once a day arround 30 000 records from one table into another. The query uses cursor and should check if the record exists to make update, otherwise to make insert.
On this ammount of data, in visual studio I get Connection Timeout. I even unselected "Cancel long running query" in Tools/Options/Database tools, and I still get timeout. When using Sql Server management studio it works and it takes long time. I know that this query executes long time, but it will run in the middle of the night and nobody will bother.
I could have transfered this data in the application and then return it to the database one by one, but why unnecesary transport?
How do I get the stored procedure running without this timeout?
Thanks
I am having a problem with a long running stored proceudure timing out in a web page.
Details:
In ASP page - run stored procedure
After approx 30 seconds, I get the error msg:
Microsoft OLE DB Provider for ODBC Drivers error '80040e31'
[Microsoft][ODBC SQL Server Driver]Timeout expired
xxx.asp, line 284
(this is where the exec statement is for the stored procedure)
The procuedure takes approx 2:20 to run directly in Query Analyzer. Any ideas on how to ensure that the page waits for the entire query to finish and return results? I suspect that some fine tuning can be done on the procedure but it will still take longer than the 30 seconds that the browser is giving it to run...
Notes - query works.
takes 2:20 to complete.
ASP - Server Timeout set to 600 seconds for the ASP page.
SQL Server timeout set to 0 (unlimited)
SQL 7 SP1 applied
Thanks,
Dave
I have a stored procedure, one varchar(20) input parameter and 6 varchar(100) output parameters....
I have set some prints in it to see where it is getting to before the timeout, but it doesn't get to the first print right after the variables....
Seems like if I change the 20 character input string it runs through just fine....
Very weird, happens both in a VB6 Program and in SQL Query Analyzer...
Seems like I'm stealing all the threads here, : But I need to learn :) I have a StoredProcedure that needs to return values that other StoredProcedures return.Rather than have my DataAccess layer access the DB multiple times, I would like to call One stored Procedure, and have that stored procedure call the others to get the information I need. I think this way would be more efficient than accessing the DB multiple times. One of my SP is:SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, S.Name AS 'StatusName', S.ItemDetailStatusID, S.InProgress as 'StatusInProgress', S.Color AS 'StatusColor',T.[Name] AS 'TypeName', T.Prefix, T.Name AS 'ItemDetailTypeName', T.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails I INNER JOIN Item.ItemDetailStatus S ON I.ItemDetailStatusID = S.ItemDetailStatusID INNER JOIN [Item].ItemDetailTypes T ON I.ItemDetailTypeID = T.ItemDetailTypeID However, I already have StoredProcedures that return the exact same data from the ItemDetailStatus table and ItemDetailTypes table.Would it be better to do it above, and have more code to change when a new column/field is added, or more checks, or do something like:(This is not propper SQL) SELECT I.ItemDetailID, I.ItemDetailStatusID, I.ItemDetailTypeID, I.Archived, I.Expired, I.ExpireDate, I.Deleted, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailStatusInfo I.ItemDetailStatusID, EXEC [Item].ItemDetailTypeInfo I.ItemDetailTypeID FROM [Item].ItemDetails IOr something like that... Any thoughts?
View 3 Replies View RelatedGreetings:
I have MSSQL 2005. On earlier versions of MSSQL saving a stored procedure wasn't a confusing action. However, every time I try to save my completed stored procedure (parsed successfully ) I'm prompted to save it as a query on the hard drive.
How do I cause the 'Save' action to add the new stored procedure to my database's list of stored procedures?
Thanks!
We recently upgraded to SQL Server 2005. We had several stored procedures in the master database and, rather than completely rewriting a lot of code, we just recreated these stored procedures in the new master database.
For some reason, some of these stored procedures are getting stored as "System Stored Procedures" rather than just as "Stored Procedures". Queries to sys.Objects and sys.Procedures shows that these procs are being saved with the is_ms_shipped field set to 1, even though they obviously were not shipped with the product.
I can't update the sys.Objects or sys.Procedures views in 2005.
What effect will this flag (is_ms_shipped = 1) have on my stored procedures?
Can I move these out of "System Stored Procedures" and into "Stored Procedures"?
Thanks!
Hello friends......How are you ? I want to ask you all that how can I do the following ?
I want to now that how many ways are there to do this ?
How can I call one or more stored procedures into perticular one Stored Proc ? in MS SQL Server 2000/05.
Hello
I'm start to work with SSIS.
We have a lot (many hundreds) of old (SQL Server2000) procedures on SQL 2005.
Most of the Stored Procedures ends with the following commands:
SET @SQLSTRING = 'SELECT * INTO ' + @OutputTableName + ' FROM #RESULTTABLE'
EXEC @RETVAL = sp_executeSQL @SQLSTRING
How can I use SSIS to move the complete #RESULTTABLE to Excel or to a Flat File? (e.g. as a *.csv -File)
I found a way but I think i'ts only a workaround:
1. Write the #Resulttable to DB (changed Prozedure)
2. create data flow task (ole DB Source - Data Conversion - Excel Destination)
Does anyone know a better way to transfer the #RESULTTABLE to Excel or Flat file?
Thanks for an early Answer
Chaepp
I am running a large insert in a stored procedure, and it is timing out after 30 seconds (which I take to be the default). Can anyone tell me how to change the timeout from inside the stored procedure?
Thanks.
im testing an application change that should handle a timeout on a stored procedure being called from the application. thing is, the timeout that we experience in production that led to this fix is random. so is there some way for me to setup a test stored procedure or some way to call the SP so that i can test a timeout scenario?
im using MFC and the CDatabase::ExecuteSQL method to call this SP if you were wondering at all.
this app is running locally on the server that has an instance of SQL Server Express 2k5 on it. server is running win 2k3.
Guys,
In simple terms, our system is as such: We have a website. As someone clicks a button on the website, a stored procedure is executed against our database.
Every single day, between 12:15AM and 12:45AM we have a few stored procedures timing out, with the following message, for example:
2007-04-10 00:37:03,268 [3632] ERROR Service - caught exception Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.OnError(SqlExc eption exception, Boolean breakConnection)
I checked and saw that although there are jobs running at that time, all of these jobs are running periodically (e.g. every 30 minutes) and would cause timeouts at other times as well, if they were to blame. Other jobs are running at far away times and checking their history I know that their duraion in no way intersects the time-out times.
I also ran profiler during peak hours and know that no stored procedure of ours has a duration anywhere near 30 seconds (which is the currently set timeout period, although all of our sps run within milliseconds).
I am really puzzled as to what exactly is causing these timeouts. Would anyone suggest any approach to identify the problem. For example, I thought about running profiler (server side tracing) between 12AM and 1AM, but am not sure which counters are best to capture. Any suggestion on this?
Thanks a lot!
I Have a problem When I execute a stored procedure from query analyzer
(Exec storedname @parameter1='', @Parameter2='') it take 7 min. and I stop running
If I copy stored procedure , past it in Query analyzer and declare parameters
it take 3 sec.
Is there a way to force a stored procedure timeout?
I need this to happen to test an error handling method.
Hi,
I'm running a CLR stored procedure through my web using table adapters as follows:
res = BLL.contractRateAdviceAdapter.AutoGenCRA() 'with BLL being the business logic layer that hooks into the DAL containing the table adapters.
The AutoGen stored procedure runs fine when executed directly from within Management Studio, but times out after 30 seconds when run from my application. It's quite a complex stored procedure and will often take longer than 30 seconds to complete.
The stored procedure contains a number of queries and updates which all run as a single transaction. The transaction is defined as follows:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
options.IsolationLevel = Transactions.IsolationLevel.ReadUncommittedoptions.Timeout = New TimeSpan(1, 0, 0)
Using scope As New TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required, options)
'Once we've opened this connection, we need to pass it through to just about every
'function so it can be used throughout. Opening and closing the same connection doesn't seem to work
'within a single transactionUsing conn As New SqlConnection("Context Connection=true")
conn.Open()
ProcessEffectedCRAs(dtTableInfo, arDateList, conn)
scope.Complete()
End Using
End Using
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said, the code encompassed within this transaction performs a number of database table operations, using the one connection. Each of these operations uses it's own instance of SQLCommand. For example:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Dim dt As DataTable
Dim strSQL As StringDim cmd As New SqlCommand
cmd.Connection = conn
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text
cmd.CommandTimeout = 0Dim rdr As SqlDataReaderstrSQL = "SELECT * FROM " & Table
cmd.CommandText = strSQL
rdr = cmd.ExecuteReader
SqlContext.Pipe.Send(rdr)
rdr.Close()
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each instance of SQLCommand throughout the stored procedure specifies cmd.CommandTimeout = 0, which is supposed to be endless. And the fact that the stored procedure is successful when run directly from Management studio indicates to me that the stored procedure itself is fine. I also know from output messages that there is no issues with the database connection.
I've set the ASP.Net configuration properties in IIS accordingly.
Are there any other settings that I need to change?
Can I set a timeout property when I'm calling the stored procedure in the first place?
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Hi,
Do you know how to write stored procedures inside another stored procedure in MS SQL.
Create procedure spMyProc inputData varchar(50)
AS
----- some logical
procedure spMyProc inputInsideData varchar(10)
AS
--- some logical
--- go
-------
I am writing a set of store procedures (around 30), most of them require the same basic logic to get an ID, I was thinking to add this logic into an stored procedure.
The question is: Would calling an stored procedure from within an stored procedure affect performance? I mean, would it need to create a separate db connection? am I better off copying and pasting the logic into all the store procedures (in terms of performance)?
Thanks in advance
John
I have a stored procedure when query a big table about 500,000 records. When I run the stored procedure in the query analyzer, it is very fast and it only takes 2~3 seconds. However, when my aspx page try to call this stored-procedure with a Command's ExecuteReader method like bellow:
SqlDataReader myReader = myCommand.ExecuteReader();
I always get timeout expired exception. I try to set the connection timeout and command timeout to 100 seconds. The exception is gone but the average execution time is about 25 seconds! While the stored-procedure only takes about 2~3 seconds in query analyzer with the same parameter.
What could be the problem?? I tried to figure this out for a couple days but still no clue.
Thanks.
We have a stored procedure that will return at most about 600 records. In almost all cases it works fine, but in a few odd cases the command times out when used from a webform. We changed the CommandTimeout property to 120 seconds... no difference. If we run a query that times out in Query Analyzer, it runs in under 3 seconds (on the SQL Server machine). We also did a lot of profiling, and for any page that runs fine, the query takes about the same time when called from a webform and run in the Query Analyzer.
We ran our tests on the pre-production environment with absolutely no one else on the machines. We also created a test page that just fills a DataSet. Straightforward... get connection object, create command, set params, create data adapter, fill dataset. It suffers the same problem.
The web server and SQL server are two separate machines. Oh, and before I forget... This is SQL 2000. It used to run SQL 7, and all the queries there were (slightly) slower, but none timed out, not even the ones that do now.
Maybe the first question should be:
How can it be that a query that runs fine in Query Analyzer times out from a webform?
greets all,
i have a express set up and running a table filled with a few batches of records. Each batch has approx. 20k records. I have a program that inserts a new batch into the table. afterwards, it makes a call to a stored procedure. this SP compares the last batch with the latest batch and marks the records as additions, updated, or deleted records (which will be used by the program). the problem im experiencing is that the comparison algorithm is getting the "Timeout expired" error returning back to my program. the SP seems to take roughly 1-3 minutes to make the comparisons. i tried setting the execution timeout to 0 (no timeout) in Options->Query Execution->SQL Server->General but i still encounter the problem. am i changing the wrong option for this or is there something else i can try? im going to try to reproduce this database in SQL Server 2000 so i can use the profiler, but im running into problems exporting the database to an older version (im not familiar with bcp, which im looking into). any advice until then?
Hi all - I'm trying to optimized my stored procedures to be a bit easier to maintain, and am sure this is possible, not am very unclear on the syntax to doing this correctly. For example, I have a simple stored procedure that takes a string as a parameter, and returns its resolved index that corresponds to a record in my database. ie
exec dbo.DeriveStatusID 'Created'
returns an int value as 1
(performed by "SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName= 'Created')
but I also have a second stored procedure that needs to make reference to this procedure first, in order to resolve an id - ie:
exec dbo.AddProduct_Insert 'widget1'
which currently performs:SET @statusID = (SELECT statusID FROM statusList WHERE statusName='Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
I want to simply the insert to perform (in one sproc):
SET @statusID = EXEC deriveStatusID ('Created')INSERT INTO Products (productname, statusID) VALUES (''widget1', @statusID)
This works fine if I call this stored procedure in code first, then pass it to the second stored procedure, but NOT if it is reference in the second stored procedure directly (I end up with an empty value for @statusID in this example).
My actual "Insert" stored procedures are far more complicated, but I am working towards lightening the business logic in my application ( it shouldn't have to pre-vet the data prior to executing a valid insert).
Hopefully this makes some sense - it doesn't seem right to me that this is impossible, and am fairly sure I'm just missing some simple syntax - can anyone assist?
Hello. I've read some similar topics (most of them on this forum), but none of them helped.
I have a stored procedure which runs fine on SQL Server (in 0 ms). The problem occurs when i try to run it under a WindowsForm application (C#).
The following code
Code Block
SqlCommand cmdUpdate;
SqlConnection sqlCon = GetConnection();
cmdUpdate = new SqlCommand("StoredProcedure_Name", sqlCon);
cmdUpdate.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure;
sqlCon.Open();
cmdUpdate.CommandTimeout = 300;
cmdUpdate.ExecuteNonQuery();
produces the exception: "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding." on the ExecuteNonQuery() line.
It's not a problem with the CommandTimeout or the ConnectionTimeout (from within the connection string), they are both set to 300 (and even when set to 0, the problem is the same).
It's very strange, because only two stored procedures don't work, the others work without any problems and under SQL Server (using EXEC stored_procedure) all of them work fine. It seems like the stored procedure is executed, but no response is returned to the client (the WinForm app), thus the timeout exception.
Any ideas? Thanks.
Server Error in '/' Application.
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.Source Error:
An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below. Stack Trace:
[InvalidOperationException: Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in use and max pool size was reached.]
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) +1188873
System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) +105
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open() +111
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +413
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
LogDo.Log_Db_Save(String sjm, String k_sql, String bz) +438
LogDo.Log_Save(Exception e, String sql) +124
DataCaoZuo.Manage_ResultTB_Caozuo(String comstr) +145
Cls_UserManage.GetAllUserList() +18
Index.Page_Load(Object sender, EventArgs e) +83
System.Web.Util.CalliHelper.EventArgFunctionCaller(IntPtr fp, Object o, Object t, EventArgs e) +15
System.Web.Util.CalliEventHandlerDelegateProxy.Callback(Object sender, EventArgs e) +34
System.Web.UI.Control.OnLoad(EventArgs e) +99
System.Web.UI.Control.LoadRecursive() +47
System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +1061
Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.832; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.832
Ok bear with me here :). I have a server that is getting about 1000000 hits per day with about 10,000 unique vistors. For the past 2 months I have been revamping my code trying to deal with the increase in traffic. I have 2 boxes, one for the website, and one for the SQL. They are connected through a secure backlink so that I dont have to worry about encrypting the data. So the problem started when I updated the MDAC components a few weeks ago. I started getting these freaking timeout errors, they are up to about 1000 errors per hour. I have been monitoring the connection pooling using the system monitor for about a week and have noticed that I am not maxing out the pooling but I am still dropping connections. I went into the web.config and turned my max connections to 1000. Unfortunately this didn't even put a dent in the problem. It doesn't matter if I have 12 or 212 open connections it still drops them. I am at my wits end with trying to debug this problem. I am wondering if anyone else has had similiar problems recently. Also on a side note I have checked all my connections to make sure that I am closing them. Not only do I close my datareaders but I also set them to nothing. In addition to closing and reseting my datareaders I am also disposing and reseting my connection objects as well as closing them. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Daniel Christoffersen
Hey,
From time to time i get this error "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not responding." so I tried to change the connection string by adding thie following "Connect Timeout=200; pooling='true'; Max Pool Size=200" but still it is giving the same error! so why is this happening ? and what can I do!
btw the timeout expired happens when a stored procedure is executed at the Fill method !
Thank you in advance
Hiba
Hi All,
I am facing a problem in SQL Server 2005 and the .NET Environment. I have an SP, which will return me the result within fraction of second when i execute it in SQL Server Management studio. But randomly (Frequently), its giving timeout when i execute it from .NET Envirnment.
If i execute it at that same time in Management studio, i am not getting the error. But getting the Timeout when i execute it in the Server Explorere of VS 2005 or in the Application which uses it.
Can any one figure out the solution.
Hi Team Iam working in a asp.net web application. In my system i have installed the xp as os and the in my network is of 2003 server. All files and database are there. But when me accessing the files from my laptop it shows the error as follows Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
operation or the server is not responding.Description:
An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web
request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and
where it originated in the code. Exception Details:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: Timeout expired. The timeout period
elapsed prior to completion of the operation or the server is not
responding.Source Error:
Line 19: con = New SqlConnection(constring)Line 20: If con.State = ConnectionState.Open Then con.Close()Line 21: con.Open()Line 22: cmdobj = New SqlCommand(query, con) Source File:
Y:Inetpubwwwrootsreeskybuilderssreeskybuildersdbmain.vb Line:
21 If me accessing that same from that mechine there were no errors and i can go thru that program successfully. So please help me to do access the db from anywhere in my network Thanks Rajesh.C.S