Hi, can anyone help me? I want to know whether is it possible to insert records simultaneously in both master & detail tables?
For elaboration, say there is a master table contains (orderid,orderdate,amount) and details table contains (orderid, productid,qty,price). 1 record of master table associated with n records of details table. Can it be possible to insert both the 1 record at master table with n records in details table in a single sql statement?
I'm new to SQL and need help with a query. Not sure if this is the right place.
I have 2 tables, one MASTER and one DETAIL.
The MASTER table has a masterID, name and the DETAIL table has a detailID, masterID, and value columns.
I want to return a populated MASTER table with entries based on the DETAIL.value.
SELECT MASTER.* FROM MASTER WHERE DETAIL.value > 3
This is a simplified version of my problem. I can't figure out how to set the relationship between MASTER.masterID and DETAIL.masterID. If I do an INNER JOIN, the number of results are based on the number of DETAIL entries. I only want one entry per MASTER entry.
Hello community,I think my problem is easy to solve even though I did not find a solution through different tutorials and help pages. Here it is (select statements are hier simplified):In the gridview "GridView1" I have a master record with person_id, which is the data-key-value. There is also another id-field named task_id (This record comes from a database view which joins the persons- and the tasks- table) SelectCommand="SELECT [id], [person_id], [task_id] FROM [ViewPersonTasks] WHERE ([id] = @id)"For both fields I want to display details in two different detail-views. One for the person (depending on person_id) and one for the tasks (depending on the task_id).The first one is easy. I declare a details-view for the person data based on a SqlDataSource with a control-parameter like this: SelectCommand="SELECT [person_id], [first_name], [last_name], [birth_date] FROM [TabPersons] WHERE ([person_id] = @person_id)" .... <SelectParameters> <asp:ControlParameter ControlID="GridView1" Name="person_id" PropertyName="SelectedValue" Type="Int32" /> </SelectParameters>But now the problem: how should I declare a parameter @task_id for the task_id, so that the second select statement for the tasks-details-view retrievs the data for the tasks: SelectCommand="SELECT [task_id], [task_name], [task_date], [task_description] FROM [TabTasks] WHERE ([task_id] = @task_id)"@task_id should have the value from the task_id-field of the master record, displayd in the master grid-view.Thank you in advance for your help
I'd like to put together a summary report for some of my management staff. The report should show the # of jobs that match about 20 different statuses. Each status has different criteria. For example, one might look for a date in a datetime field and the type of job. Another might look at whether a date has passed and the quantity we're shipping.
Sort of like this: Status Items Jobs Status #1: 50000 15 Status #2: 25251 3
I want the user to see this summary information, but also have drill down capability. I'd like the ability to print the summary or just a drill-down.
I'm also considering using Dundas Charts for RS on the report.
Can I accomplish this with Reporting Services? If so, any tips on how to do it? If this a bunch of sub-reports? Can I sum the # of jobs on a sub-report? Should I be looking at BI for this?
I need to know the best approach to save data in master table and then in detail table. I know this method but i know it's not a good approach why i will explain
Insertion in Master Table..................................... A
Insertion in Detail Table........................................B
Now if there is any exception occurred while step A then the step B will not take place which is ok but if there is exception while step B then the process A will have completed i.e the data in master table will be Inserted/Deleted/Updated but there will not be a corresponding action in Detail table which is not good approach.
So please can any one tell me a good approach for this.
As part of a project, I'm not allowed to use foreign keys, well can't. But I have a problem with this master detail relationship (and a very simple one too). Tables to begin with: Invoice: invoiceid : bigint indentity autoincrement primarykey Detail: invoiceid: bigint - detailnumber:bigint - desc : char20 Okay - I want to set these two tables up such than when I create a new invoice, and subsequently get the new invoiceid, and I start to add detail records to the detail table, I want the detailnumber to autoincrement when I do an SQL Insert. Right now I have detailnumber as the primary key, so when you view the detail records, it looks like: (invoiceid, detailnumber, desc) 1,1,text - 1,2,text - 1,3,text - 2,4, text on another invoice - 3,5, text I want it to work like: (invoiceid, detailnumber, desc) 1,1,text - 1,2,text - 1,3,text - 2,1, text on another invoice - 3,1, text where the invoiceid and the detail number make up the primary key. I seem to recall you could do this is PHP before it had foreign keys & such, and I'm completely drawing a blank on this. BTW - I'm using enterprise manager to set this up, but I can use QA with a sample script to acheive the same. I realize this may be (and probably is) off-topic here, but I can't figure out where to ask. Thanks in advance.
Help! Surely this has happened to others before me. A new customer wants to send updates in a fixed-width txt file in which master and detail rows alternate.
How do you do this?
Do you: 1) Painfully muck around with 100,000 rows in the .txt file first--split it into 2 files, one for master records and one for detail records and then process? If so, what do you use? I'd probably hack at it with a VB Script module in a DTS package.
or
2) Is there a way to feed it into 2 tables where rows starting with x go to one table and rows starting with y go to another?
The plan was to use a fast and dirty DTS package to shove this stuff into a table (probably 2 but we might just toss the stuff we don't need and put in in one) but I'd like some advice on how to proceed.
In second Table store those records who are selected and stored in 2nd table. NameAppidFunctionCodeFunNameSubFunCode Data810Summary0 Data820View0 Data830&View0 Ad630Mbl20
Our requirements we use one query, In query fetch total 5 rows. and output show like this
I'd like to create a master-detail output from SQL2005 to display in a page using classic ASP. Ideally, I want the output to contain a <div> to show/hide the order details beneathe the order header, as shown below.
I currently just have a stored procedure returning the results and it is very slow as I'm simply querying the details section for each order header. Does anyone have any ideas on how I can create an efficient and fast method for returning these results in the format above?
I have multiple drop down lists that I would like to have send parameters to a stored procedure that does a select on the data. (Kind of like a search feature) But if a ddl isnt populated, I want that to act like a * and get all. For instance, I have a persontype, state, and country drop down lists. If I drop the state one down to WA, I want the gridview to populate with all the people in WA regardless or their type. If I populate type and state, have it give me both regardless of country. What does the stored procedure or select syntax look like for this? (What would the default values of my dropdown boxes?) my current sql select statement (The bottom 3 are bit fields which are throwing me off a bit too). do i need to have some IsNull statments around each variable in the select?SELECT
tblPerson.PersonTypeID = @PersonTypeID and tblPerson.StateID = @StateID and tblPerson.CountryID = @CountryID and tblPerson.SchoolID = @SchoolID and tblPerson.InterestChapterLeaders = @InterestChapterLeaders and tblPerson.InterestMembers = @InterestMembers and tblPerson.InterestUniLeader = @InterestUniLeader
now i want to learn how to make a stored procedure to insert a record to `purchase` table, and many records to `purchase_detail` table with transaction where the some value are passed from vb6 through the parameters. i've made a SP to insert 1 record to `purchase` table n 1 record to `purchase_detail` just for testing, so i set the disc value to 10. it works fine... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CREATE PROCEDURE `usp_save_purchase`(xpurch_id VARCHAR(10), xpurch_date VARCHAR(10), xsupp_id VARCHAR(10), xitem_id VARCHAR(10), xqty TINYINT(3), xprice DOUBLE(15,2)) BEGIN START TRANSACTION; INSERT INTO purchase(purch_id,purch_date,supplier_id) VALUES(xpurch_id, xpurch_date, xsupplier_id); INSERT INTO purchase_detail(purch_id,item_id,qty,price,disc) VALUES(xpurch_id, xitem_id, xqty, xprice, 10); COMMIT; END --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- what i need is something like that but i only pass 3 variables (purch_id, purch_date, and supp_id) to SP, and then the SP will insert 1 record of purchase to `purchase` table, and add the purchase items to `purchase_detail` automatically from `purch_temp` table, and use the disc rate based on `supplier_id` and `item_id` from supplier_disc table, which will be looked something like this: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CREATE PROCEDURE `usp_save_purchase`(xpurch_id VARCHAR(10), xpurch_date VARCHAR(10), xsupp_id VARCHAR(10)) BEGIN START TRANSACTION; INSERT INTO purchase(purch_id,purch_date,supplier_id) VALUES(xpurch_id, xpurch_date, xsupplier_id); /*start looping here get the disc rate for each items where supp_id = xsupplier_id and item_id = the item_id from purch_temp table, and save it in a local variable (let's say local_disc) INSERT INTO purchase_detail(purch_id,item_id,qty,price,disc) VALUES(xpurch_id, xitem_id, xqty, xprice, local_disc); */ COMMIT; END --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- can anyone help me please? thank you in advance...
I need to write a sql query which is a master-detail query. Here's the example structure of tables:
Master table: ColID as longint, ColA as int, ColB as int, ColPartID as longint, ColPartName as longint
Child table -- Wheel: ColID as longint, ColA as int, ColB as int Child table -- Door: ColID as longint, ColA as int, ColB as int Child table -- Window: ColID as longint, ColA as int, ColB as int ..... etc
From the master table, it needs to join with its child in order to get the detailed information. However, there're more than one child table for it to join. In other words, the query has to choose the correct child table to join for each row selectively. The use of correct child depends on one of the columns in its master table (ColPartName).
My question is: Does it worth of me keep finding a solution for this query or should I abandon this? I really need some advice, please.
The plant number field is a location based field that the application uses to filter/select data on for the end users. What they want to be able to do is to select a record, select another location from a dropdown list and then click a button that duplicates the master record and the detail records to the new location.
I am thinking that a stored procedure passing the JSAID and new Location number to do it, I am just not sure how to get the new ID when I go to copy the detail records.
Almost new to ssrs, accessing Oracle's stored procedures to feed the reports (no other choice), working on a master/detail report and badly stuck. This report needs to access 3 stored procedures one for master and two for small tables under it. The master's order ID is fed to the two stored procedures that may or may not pull any thing for certain order ID's I am approaching it by creating 2 datasets and a page-long list, added desired text boxes and a table in the list, grouped the list on order ID and passing it to tables using default values etc. but keep getting the following message. "The Group expression for the table €˜table1€™ refers to the field €˜ProductName€™. Report item expressions can only refer to fields within the current data set scope or, if inside an aggregate, the specified data set scope". The list seems to be associated to one dataset only and any item in it cannot refer to anyother dataset, even if I try to access the table's dataset in its properties (The 'current data set scope' implies that). (Not sure what will happen when I will try to add the second table and dataset with the same parameter name). How should I approach this issue. I will appreciate help, if explained in steps but won't mind a good tip. Thanks.
I'm currently strugling with the setup of our packages for deployment to a new environment.
We are working with a master/detail package setup. One master package is created that will call all child packages. In the master package we don't have any connection towards our source and/or target databases/sourcesystems.
Everything works fine, however, starting to deploy the whole set of packages, it seems that we don't have the option to set specific properties of our detailed packages, e.g. connection properties. But this is just what we need.
When we are adding a job in the Job Agent for our master package to be scheduled, we want to be able to set all different connection manager properties, not only the one from the master package and definitely the ones from the detailed packages as there we switch the connections from the development environment towards the acceptance environment.
I tried to fix this with parent package variables, but I can't set the password property, only the ServerName and UserName can be set, not the Password.
Anyone an idea what the easiest and best approach is to solve this burden?
I have a master detail reports in one page. Master report displays all the products and details report shows their orders... What I want is, when user clicks on products graph its detail graph show the orders of that particular record on the same page. Both reports would remain visible on the same page side by side.
I am attempting to setup a Master-Details with GridView/DetailsView but I can't seem to find any information on using a stored procedure that requires parameters with the SqlDataSource control. SelectCommandType specifies that you are using a stored proc. SelectCommand specifies the name of the proc, but I haven't found any information on how to pass a parameter to the stored procedure.Is it even possible or do I have to forget about using the DetailsView control altogether?
The CUSTOMERS table holds the record date span into which the FLAGS table records have to "fit". In no case will the date spans from the FLAGS table fall outside the STARTDATE - ENDDATE span in the CUSTOMERS table for any CUSTOMERNBR. Here is an example of the final expected output in the DHS table from combining records in the CUSTOMERS and FLAGS tables:
I am listing detail transaction lines in a table sorted by account and order number. the problem is that I only want to see the detail if the sum of a value field is zero for all the transactions in an order otherwise ignore the detail for that order.
I was trying Group by and Having but this doesn't seem to do what I need.
Being relatively new to Reporting services, any nudge in the right direction would be useful.
If multiple snapshots for the same report attempt to generate at the same second, is there something in place to prevent them from conflicting with each other?
Our SSRS 2005 application will use a console app that we are writing to change the default parameters on each report and call the CreateReportHistorySnapshot method. This application will be multi-threaded, so there is a possibility that multiple versions of the same report with different parameters will attempt to run at the same time. We need to be sure that these snapshots will not conflict and return the appropriate SnapshotHistoryID for that report run.
From looking at the History table in the ReportServer database it looks like there are uniqueIDs and other keys that would prevent duplicates, but what if the requests come in at the same time? Is SSRS 2005 smart enough to delay for a second so that there is not a duplicate? Since the way you reference these snapshots in your URL is with the Snapshot Time in UTC format, that only goes out to full seconds (2006-05-02T00:00:00).
Sorry for the length, but I could not think of how to condense this.
I have C# Express and the SQL Express Management Studio CTP installed. So far, I've been forced to disconnect from the server in one app to connect to it in the other. I understand there is something around a 4 connection limit in SQLServer Express, so I don't see the problem.
During one of these episodes, SQL Mgmt Studio hung while opening DB properties, then the SQLServer service couldn't be stopped. Now the DB can't be opened even after a reboot.
I have an application resource that is accessible from multiple clients applications that all have access to a common SQL Server db. By this, I mean, multiple clients can potentially connect to this resource at any given time. I want to limit the usage of this resource to one client at a time and was thinking about simply using SQL to maintain the name of the client that currently has "control" of the resource.
My question pertains to the case where two clients are executing a SQL query, simultaneously, to check whether someone has control of the resource or not. If two users were to simultaneously execute this query, do i have to lock the table in order to ensure that both users are not viewing data in an incorrect state? Or, does SQL Server ultimately execute the queries in a specific order? Meaning, the requests are simultaneous from a human standpoint but one request may have actually come in a millisecond before the other one and SQL server executes that query first, and then the second query. Is this how it works?
I have a Windows 2003 Server. Planning to use SQL Server to act as the main Database Server which needs to cater to over 100's of simultaneous connections.
Can anyone share with me the default maximum simultaneous connections and the maximum allowed simultaneous connections for the following versions:
- MSDE - 2000 - 2005 Express - 2005
Hope I can get more professional advice from you guys.
Using the Import/Export Wizard, it is easy to set up SSIS jobs to import multiple tables in one task. However, SSIS appears to grab a connection to the source database and the destination database for each table indicated in the task sometime prior to doing the actual data transfer. Even though the transfer seems to be done a few tables at a time, all the connections are held throughout the execution of the task.
This has two effects:
1. The task may fail if the number of connections exceeds the limit of user connections set for the database
2. There is a severe impact on the other users of the databases (in my case, the source is a production system)
Is there any way to control the number of simultaneous connections that SSIS data transfer packages initiate?
I can, of course, define the package to have a small number of tables (thus limiting the connections), but in real life I need to transfer almost 700 tables, so limiting the number of tables per task to 20 or 25 produces an awkwardly large, and error prone, number of tasks. And since this definition must be done for multiple (not quite identical) databases, the extra effort of defining small collections of tables is signifcant.
Are there any limit of simultaneous users and/or connections when running SQL Express? The free license of SQL Express, does that include use by any number of users/devices?
hello to all,there are two databases named A and B.One database contains employee id as primaryI have another project database which includes that employee id asforeign key. How can I reflect my updations,deletionsthank you in advance,vishnu
Is there a way to get the Report Manager to allow a single user to execute more than 1 report at a time? Currently, each user can only have a single report being executed at a time. It looks like any other reports are being queued and executed serially.
How can I prevent a package, or a section of a package, from being run more than once simultaneously? The package makes use of a staging database table, and if two copies of this package are run at the same time, there will be a race condition and possible corruption of the data in the database table. I have also noticed that the SSIS logging gets messed up and starts overwriting itself if I have more than one of these packages run at the same time.
What I am thinking of should work the same way as a serializable transaction lock on a normal query, where one query has to wait if another query has a lock on the table. I don't want the package to throw an error, I want it to wait until the other one is done.
I have been trying to use transactions in a test SSIS package, but they are not quite doing what I want them to do. I put various SSIS steps in a sequence container and require a serializable transaction. I have also tried putting the transaction at the package level, but that is not preventing simultaneous package runs.
Is there a built-in way to do this that is easy to implement? Otherwise, what I could do is insert a flag into the database indicating that a package is running, then make sure to reset the flag on any error or on completion. It seems like this alternate method could be error-prone though.
