I'm collecting id based on user's selection and storing to ArrayList/String[in asp.net]. Now want to pass those ids stored to stroed procedure. I want SP to update all records in single statement using in like update table set field in (value).
I'm storing id with comma (,) separator. Below is my asp.net code:
string sId=string.Empty;
for(int a=0;a<Id.Count;a++)
{
Id += Id;
if(a!=Id.Count-1)
sId +=",";
}
In database id column is int type. I'm passing id collected with comma separator and passing it as a parameter to SP. but it is giving error related converting to int or similar.
Plz help me create Stored Procedure in SQL 2005 based on above scenario.
Table Name:-emp table structure:- Name Gender A Male B Male C FeMale D FeMale I want only one update query to update this table like this table structure:- Name Gender A FeMale B FeMale C Male D Male please help me?
I could write a query with a sub-query in order to perform an UPDATE on the most recent 60,000 records of a table based on a date field, but unfortunately I am receiving an error.
Code: SELECT * FROM DMTM SET transmit_date = '2012-05-07 00:00:00.000', transmit_status = '1223' WHERE temp_pk in
I need to write a single query that will append the values from one table into another table but I need to update a single field in the table with a static value. What I'm working with is an Access .adp with an SQL 2000 backend. The database is used to track ticket sales, payments, and contact info for season ticket holders. Prior to upsizing, each year the database would be copied and then choice bits modified for the next year.
In other words, the history was in several databases, i.e. db2001, db2002, db2003 and for the current year dbcurrent. I decided to create a historic tables in the current DB rather than have umpteen DBs on my SQL server.
My problem is that I need to create a query that appends to my table the previous years data and then updates the season field to reflect the season that the data came from.
In short, say I have a table named accounts with fields account, customer, addr1, addr2, ..., ticket type and I want it to end up in account_hist with fields account, customer, addr1, addr2, ..., ticket type, SEASON and make the season equal say 8 which represents the 8th season the team has played. I can get both queries to work seperately :D , but for end user ease, I want to perform both actions at the same time :confused: . Can anybody point me in the right direction? Thanks
I have an application that needs user parameters for some reports, and it allows them to enter any amount of said parameter, so the query is built like this:"Select ... Where ParameterColumn IN (" + txtParameters.Text + ")";the parameters textbox only allows numbers and commas to be on the safe side of SQL injection. now, due to this the query has to be built dynamically in the code behind page. is there any way to use a single parameter to add all of those values? and set the parameter to the text in the control during design mode to the datasource control?something like: Select ... Where ParameterColumn IN (@Parameters) <asp:ControlParameter ControlID="txtParameters" Name="Parameters" PropertyName="Text " />whenever I try that I get something along the lines of "Error converting nvarchar '1,2,3' to datatype int"Thanks!
I am hoping someone can shed light on this odd behavior I am seeing running a simple UPDATE statement on a table in SQL Server 2000. I have 2 tables - call them Table1 and Table2 for now (among many) that need to have certain columns updated as part of a single transaction process. Each of the tables has many columns. I have purposely limited the target column for updating to only ONE of the columns in trying to isolate the issue. In one case the UPDATE runs fine against Table1... at runtime in code and as a manual query when run in QueryAnalyzer or in the Query window of SSManagementStudio - either way it works fine. However, when I run the UPDATE statement against Table2 - at runtime I get rowsaffected = 0 which of course forces the code to throw an Exception (logically). When I take out the SQL stmt and run it manually in Query Analyzer, it runs BUT this is the output seen in the results pane... (0 row(s) affected) (1 row(s) affected) How does on get 2 answers for one query like this...I have never seen such behavior and it is a real frustration ... makes no sense. There is only ONE row in the table that contains the key field passed in and it is the same key field value on the other table Table1 where the SQL returns only ONE message (the one you expect) (1 row(s) affected) If anyone has any ideas where to look next, I'd appreciate it. Thanks
I'd like to update the attribute Active of the table COMPANY_BRANCH to the value 0 (or false, since it is a bin field) on the below recordset:
SELECT COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID, MAX(PLACEMENT.ExpirationDate) AS Expr1
FROM COMPANY_BRANCH INNER JOIN
PLACEMENT ON COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID = PLACEMENT.ProducerBranchID
GROUP BY COMPANY_BRANCH.CompBranchID
HAVING (MAX(PLACEMENT.ExpirationDate) < DATEADD(yyyy, - 1, GETDATE()))
yet, I am unable to understand the concept on how this can be done. If I put it into query designer and change the query type to update, the code that gets generated is not correct - can someone help me?
Hi, I'm trying to inner join an update statement. Something like this:
update #point_connection_temp AS a inner join #point_connection_temp_two as b on a.key_fld = b.key_fld set a.next_point = b.next_point where #point_connection_temp.next_point is null order by a.key_fld
I'm getting an error message:Incorrect syntax error near AS Any help will be greatly appreciated.Thank you!!!!!!!!!1
MySQL has a ON UPDATE clause which can be used as given below:create table t(col1 varchar(90), time_col timestamp NOT NULL default CURRENT_TIMESTAMP on update CURRENT_TIMESTAMP);Whenever a column (col1) is updated time_col will also be updated with curren time stamp. Is there any equivaent in SQL ServerAm aware that this could be handled using Triggers, is there any other better solution.
I have a temporary table #Temp with, among others, a column CountryCode and a column Lastname.I would like to change the ü that appears in some names to u (u umlaut to a plain u), but only for those that have the nationality 'Ned'
My code so far:
Update #Temp set LastName = replace(Lastname, 'ü', 'ue') WHERE CountryCode = 'Ned'
This code deletes all entries in the column Lastname
I think it must be easy, but I keep staring at the code.
Hi All,In Oracle, I can easily make this query :UPDATE t1 SET (f1,f2)=(SELECT AVG(f3),SUM(f4)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6)WHERE f5='Something'I cannot seem to be able to do the same thing with MS-SQL. There areonly 2 ways I've figured out, and I fear performance cost in both cases,which are these :1)UPDATE t1 SET f1=(SELECT AVG(f3)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6)WHERE f5='Something'and then the same statement but with f2, and2)UPDATE t1 SET f1=(SELECT AVG(f3)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6),f2=(SELECT SUM(f4)FROM t2WHERE t2.f5=t1.f6)WHERE f5='Something'Is there a way with MS-SQL to do the Oracle equivalent in this case ?Thanks,Michel
I am trying to update a table and then also use OUTPUT clause to capture some of the columns. The code that I am using is something like the one below
UPDATE s SET Exception_Ind = 1 OUTPUT s.Master_Id, s.TCK_NR INTO #temp2 FROM Master_Summary s INNER JOIN Exception d ON d.Id = LEFT(s.Id, 8) AND d.Barcode_Num = s.TCK_NR WHERE s.Exception_Ind IS NULL
The above code is throwing an error as follows:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113 The multi-part identifier "s.Master_Id" could not be bound. Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113
The multi-part identifier "s.TCK_NR" could not be bound.
querey is--TABLE1 HAS A COLUMN CALLED CITY .THE RECORDS WITH CITY='DELHI' ARE IS TO BE UPDATED WITH CITY='MUMBAI' AND THE RECORDS WITH CITY='MUMBAI' ARE IS TO BE UPDATED WITH CITY='DELHI' ...
i HAVE TO WRITE A SINGLE SQLSTATEMENT TO DO THIS NOT WITH THE HELP OF CURSOR
I Want to write a single SP which inserts and updates.
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_NewPassword @UserName nvarchar(50), @OldPassword nvarchar(50), @NewPassword nvarchar(50) AS BEGIN INSERT INTO RGH_ChangePassword(vUserName, vNewPassword) VALUES(@UserName, @NewPassword) UPDATE RGH_LoginMaster SET vPassword=@NewPassword WHERE vUserName=@vUserName and vPassword=@OldPassword END
When i tried to create above sp it gives me an error saying
Msg 137, Level 15, State 2, Procedure sp_NewPassword, Line 8 Must declare the scalar variable "@vUserName".
What is the single SQL statement to truncate the blank space on either side of data. Ex. Table1 has Name as column. I have records filled with blank space on both side for Name field. With one query I want to correct (truncate the leading and trailing space) the data. How? SQL Server 2005 SP2. Thank you, Smith
I have used the below update query. However, its updating only the first value. Like its updating AB with volume when c.Type = ABC, similarly for CD. Its not updating based on the 2nd or the next case condition.
Update XYZ Set AB = a.Amt * (CASE WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN (c.volume) WHEN c.TYPE = 'DEF' THEN (c.volume) WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN (c.volume) Else 0 END), CD = CASE WHEN c.Type = 'MARGIN' THEN '4105.31' WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN '123.1' WHEN c.Type = 'DEF' THEN '234.2' WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN '567.1' END from table1 a join table2 b on a.Cust = b.Customer join table3 c on b.account = c.account and b.channel =c.channel
Why its not working properly? But if i use Select statement instead of update query its working properly.
In VB6 using MDAC 2.8 I could do a single select statement that would act as either an Insert or an update. Is there a way to do this in ADO.net? My old VB6 code Dim dbData As New ADODB.Connection Dim rs1 As New ADODB.Recordset Dim strParm As String Dim strCusNo As String ' strParm = "Provider=SQLOLEDB; Data Source=SQL2000; Initial Catalog=DATA_01; User ID=UserName; Password=password" dbData.Open strParm ' strParm = "Select CusNo from CusFil Where CusNo = '" & strCusNo & "'" rs1.Open strParm, dbData, adOpenStatic, adLockOptimistic, adCmdText If rs1.BOF And rs1.EOF Then rs1.AddNew Else
End If With rs1 !CusNo = strCusNo .Update End With rs1.Close ' Set rs1 = Nothing dbData.Close Set dbData = Nothing
Got a beginner question here... Let's say I have a database table that houses server information with four columns: make, model, serial #, ip address. And assume there are ten rows with that information filled out. How could I display all the rows of information on a single webpage (ASP.NET), with all the fields being editable; and a single save button that would send any changes to the database (in reality I guess it would be sending all rows and fields to the database, and just overwrite the previous data).
Could a page such as that be created using FrontPage 2003 or Dreamweaver MX 2004?
This would be strictly for updating information. I would have a separate form for adding a new entry.
I get a timeout expired error when running the following in a vb component.
'update cm_event_notification Set processed = '3/29/01 9:46:01 AM' Where dn = '{2E738808-23B4-11D5-B49A-00508BD934F8}'
The table dn column is a primary key, when I run it from sql Anyalzer it works. If there are two rows to update it works, just the single row update times out!
A problem has come up in designing a Web page to maintain a small reference table in SQL Server 2000 (9 columns, about 25 records).
I tried to design the Web page to allow INSERT and UPDATE operations using a single page that posts back to itself. The page contains a set of empty form fields for a new record, followed by a set of filled-in form field for each row in the table. The form fields for existing records are given a unique name based on the field name concatenated with the primary key value for that row.
If I set up the page to INSERT only, it works properly. But when I add the fields for existing records, the INSERT operation malfunctions. Specifically, anytime a set of existing fields for a particular column is added to the page, the INSERT will no longer work properly for that column. This is true for all fields except the primary key field. It always INSERTs correctly. I tried adding only some columns to the set of existing form fields. In that case, the INSERT operation added the correct values for the fields that were not listed in the existing records section, but failed for the others.
I am using the INSERT INTO syntax for that operation and the recordset .Update syntax for the edits. I tried using the recordset .AddNew/.Update syntax for the insert, but it exhibited the same problems. The column data types contain smallint, bit, nvarchar, and ntext types.
I know that the correct values are being put into the INSERT statement. I also tried renaming the INSERT form fields to be totally different than the names of the existing record fields. But the problem comes back no matter what.
If necessary, I can split the logic so that inserts and updates are handled by different pages. But I would like to make this work if possible. If a reader knows why SQL Server is causing this problem, any help would be greatly appreciated.
