Hi all, I've been building a set of traffic based reports on our website and I've run into a strange problem.
The reports are pretty basic, and up till now I've been really impressed with RS overall.
Recently I've added a StartDate and EndDate and since then the performance has gone from ~10 secs to ~10 minutes.
I've taken a really simple query from my reports. Running this query in Management Studio on the same data returns in less than a second. When its run from a test report with nothing else in it it takes ~1 minute. Even stranger when I run the same query with the same values for parameters inside of RS in the data view it takes less than 1 second. ARG!
SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT SessionID) as Occurences
FROM WebAppSummary
JOIN WebAppLocalizations
ON WebAppSummary.ClientIp = WebAppLocalizations.ClientIp
where FirstTime BETWEEN @StartDate AND @EndDate
The last line that was just added is this part:
where FirstTime BETWEEN @StartDate AND @EndDate
So whats going on here? Is this a really poorly performing query that management studio is optimizing but RS isnt? Is RS messing up the databind and getting a bunch of DSs instead of just one?
I've got 2 servers, with sql server 2000 sp3 and ms windows 2003 server. I've written a very simple stored procedure to insert 20,000 rows into a very simple table TEST (id int, msg varchar_50)
On the first server (P-IV 2 GHz), it takes 700 ms / 1000 insertions and on the second (2x Xeon 2,6 GHz), it takes 13 s / 1000 insertions...
(insertion is : INSERT INTO TEST (id, msg) VALUES (@id, 'dummy text'))
...
SQL Server was installed exactly in the same way...
what could I do see where the problem is ? With profiler, I see no difference while logging all events....
In my database/MY SERVER (SQL7/Win2K), I run a simple query with a Table/10000 rows (without cluster index): SELECT * FROM TABLE it take over 30s. Why it's slow? How can I check for reason? How to configure my server to improve performance? Thanks in advance. TH ---------------------------------- SP_CONFIGURE's RESULT in MY SERVER ----------------------------------
Table 'spt_values'. Scan count 1, logical reads 2, physical reads 0, read-ahead reads 0. name minimum maximum config_value run_value ----------------------------------- ----------- ----------- ------------ ----------- affinity mask 0 2147483647 0 0 allow updates 0 1 1 1 cost threshold for parallelism 0 32767 5 5 cursor threshold -1 2147483647 -1 -1 default language 0 9999 0 0 default sortorder id 0 255 52 52 extended memory size (MB) 0 2147483647 0 0 fill factor (%) 0 100 0 0 index create memory (KB) 704 1600000 0 0 language in cache 3 100 3 3 language neutral full-text 0 1 0 0 lightweight pooling 0 1 0 0 locks 5000 2147483647 0 0 max async IO 1 255 32 32 max degree of parallelism 0 32 0 0 max server memory (MB) 4 2147483647 2147483647 2147483647 max text repl size (B) 0 2147483647 65536 65536 max worker threads 10 1024 255 255 media retention 0 365 0 0 min memory per query (KB) 512 2147483647 1024 1024 min server memory (MB) 0 2147483647 0 0 nested triggers 0 1 1 1 network packet size (B) 512 65535 4096 4096 open objects 0 2147483647 0 0 priority boost 0 1 1 1 query governor cost limit 0 2147483647 0 0 query wait (s) -1 2147483647 -1 -1 recovery interval (min) 0 32767 0 0 remote access 0 1 1 1 remote login timeout (s) 0 2147483647 5 5 remote proc trans 0 1 0 0 remote query timeout (s) 0 2147483647 0 0 resource timeout (s) 5 2147483647 10 10 scan for startup procs 0 1 0 0 set working set size 0 1 0 0 show advanced options 0 1 1 1 spin counter 1 2147483647 10000 10000 time slice (ms) 50 1000 100 100 two digit year cutoff 1753 9999 2049 2049 Unicode comparison style 0 2147483647 196609 196609 Unicode locale id 0 2147483647 1033 1033 user connections 0 32767 0 0 user options 0 4095 0 0
I have a report in SQL Reporting Services 2005 which calls a stored proc and the report takes a very long time to run and sometimes returns zero records. But when i run the stored proc in query analyzer it takes about 4 seconds!!
I have checked the execution log on the RS using the below sql:
Code Snippet
use ReportServer
Select * from ExecutionLog with (nolock) order by TimeStart DESC
It shows that i have a large amount of time for the dataretrieval (601309ms, about 10mins) and does not return any records most likely because of a query timeout:
The weird thing is that when i run it in query analyzer, i get about 400 records in 4 seconds !!
I dont understand what RS is doing to take up so much time like this to retrieve data.
The report is very simple - it basically returns the records straight out into a table.
The only thing I somewhat suspected was a parameter data type conflict between RS and SQL, specifically dates. I have a start and end date parameter in the report - i tried specifying this as date and string to see if it made any difference but it didn't.
Dear Experts,I have a fairly simple query in which adding a where clause slowsthings down by at least a factor of 100. The following is the slowversion of the query-------------------------SELECT * FROM( Select x.event_date From x FULL OUTER JOIN yON x.event_date = y.event_date) innerQWHERE ( innerQ.event_date >= {ts '1980-01-01 00:00:00'} )------------------------Removing the where clause makes the query run quickly. This seemsextremely strange because it seems like SQL Server should simply beable to take the results of innerQ and discard anything with a datethat doesn't match. If I instead split the query into two pieces whereI create a temp table and put innerQ into that and then do the select *WHERE (...) from the temp table things work fine.Any thoughts on what SQL Server might be doing to make things slow andhow I can fix it?Thanks,-Emin
I am running simple queries against test SQL Express installation and they take a very long time to return data. I have two SQL Express instances installed on colleagues' machines to which I connect for my testing and both exhibit the same problem. The setup is Windows XP SP 2 with 2 GB RAM and 3.6 GHz CPU. I am querying a table with around 7000 records and my query is simply SELECT TOP 1000 * FROM MyTable. It takes over 10 seconds to return the recordset!
I have done the research and found posts, which talk about AUTO_CLOSE option, indexes, query execution plan, etc. I have done everything those posts recommend, but performance is still terrible. All the instances have SQL 2005 SP2 applied.
I also found that the query runs fast locally on each SQL Express instance, the problem seem to happen when I am trying to pull the data over the network.
I have a report which works fine with visual studio but when i uploaded the same into report server and tries to access it through IE or chrome or anything its dam slow.
As I sit here waiting for a test run of the report to complete, I'm forced to wonder why it's taking over 10 minutes... so far.
The query itself, when run through Management Studio takes about 50 seconds, so why would it take over 10 minutes to generate the report? It's the only query being run, and it's not doing anything especially tricky with the data. It's all actually being processed in the query, returning some counts and displaying them in a simple list.
Any thoughts?
EDIT: I should mention that the query itself isn't very simple, so I can understand the query itself being slow... just not the report being 10 times slower than the query in management studio.
I have developed several reports with selectable parameters. When the report is first requested three stored procedures are triggered and return the parameters (+2 min), following parameters being returned the default report is returned (+3 min), this time is unacceptable. Is there anything I can do to speed up the report generation? Any help here is greatly appreciated.
Hi, In a .net application there is a link that brings up a SSRS report. I have noticed that if it is the first time this report is requested i.e. Application has just been opened and the report button is clicked, then it takes a while to get this report to appear on the screen. But if this report is requested again (i.e. for the second time or more) then it only takes a few moments for the report to appear on the screen. So it seems that only the first time the report is requested it takes a longer time to get this report. Is there a way to reduce this initial load of the report? Thanks
I continue to see this similar post all over the place, but no resolutions.
We have SSRS installed and operational in production. There are reports that get accessed from either an aspx page or from the built in IIS site for SSRS.
First time access is the performance problem. Here are two scenarios:
1) from your browser, pull up the front page to SSRS: http://myserver/reports. This simple operation will take about 2 minutes to come up. Drill to the report in question and it runs fairly well first time through. Throw a different query at it and it runs faster. If you wait a while (maybe 15 minutes +) the whole thing will spin back down and take 2 minutes to come up again. If you exit the website and come back immediately, everything still stays quick.
2) from an aspx page, same thing... if the service is spun down, the end user will typically get tired of waiting or timeout. Once everything is spun up, the process runs fine.
We setup another report that just does some simple statistics and added in a timed subscription for every 15 minutes hoping it would keep the service up and running.... no joy. Still the same.
Also adjusted the app pool to about every option to see if we could keep it running, but no joy.
====
So -- any ideas? Forget about running a report.... just think about pulling the website up. 2 minutes to get it to display in the browser the first time...
Each day, the first user who launches our RS reports always gets a long wait time. Subsequent report launches are normal. Does anyone know what is going on? If yes, what is the remedy?
I am able to run a query which runs FAst in QA but slow in theapplication.It takes about 16 m in QA but 1000 ms on theApplication.What I wanted to know is why would the query take a longtime in the application when it runs fast on SQL server?How should we try debugging it?Ajay
Does anyone else have problems with the speed of the design environment for SSRS reports? We are using visual studio to create and manage hundreds of production reports (Oil and Gas).
It literally takes 5 seconds for the design environment to react to each change in the report layout. For instance, a common change is to reposition a text box, change the length, text, font size, font weight etc...:
Grab the text box - 5 seconds until designer responds - then reposition
Grab the edge to change the length - ditto
change text - 5 seconds for designer to "save" the change and allow next action....
blah - blah - blah.... So, performing the simple change above takes at least 30 seconds in addition to whatever time it took to edit the text box.
I've talked to the other developers using SSRS here and they all report that's "just the way it is".
Is this normal or is there an environment issue/setting we are overlooking.
I've searched the forums on this issue, haven't really found the answer.
I have several nifty little sales reports which crunch a ton of data quite efficiently and render in just a few seconds in Report Manager. I've pushed as much of the data processing back to the server as possible, use a stored procedure (with parameters) in a shared datasource, don't return unneccessary data, all that. It works great.
When I first developed the reports, I continued generating my charts (which use the same data as the reports, just grouped differently) in Excel and pasting them in as images. Now I want to stop that nonsense and use the SSRS charts. I fooled around with the charting function and got a reasonable facimile of my Excel charts, two per report, which use their own separate stored procedures and the same shared datasource.
Now, reports that used to render in 5-8 seconds may take 1-5 MINUTES. Help! It's definitely the charts--taking them back out fixes the problem.
I have complete control over the datasources--would it make more sense to use non-shared sources, or to create totally separate shared sources? I saw a post that recommended "making data calls non-synchronous," but I have no idea how to do that.
I have been using the report viewer to render my reports on a webpage. All worked fine for a time and now nothing is working correctly.
I have about ~8 report viewer on one page, all in an individual IFRAME. What happen is, sometimes I'm getting an error from IE (Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage) or the report starts loading (I see the title) but where the chart should be I have an X (broken image) icon.
Sometimes when I click on the image and choose "Display Image" the image will display.
Facts
Reports loads correctly on the report manager site (the Reporting Services webpage) Once those errors starts appearing, the session seems to act funny and I can't even refresh the webpage (F5) I have the latest report viewer patch installed I have the SP2 for SQL Server 2005 installed Running Windows 2000 Server Running IIS 6 The website was developped using IIS 5, but was tested on IIS 6 for about 3 weeks and we started to have problems today. The reports are linked with Analysis Services to get the data from cubes. I'm really out of ideas right now. Maybe I should just restart the IIS server, but the thing is live and I can't do it right now. However, if I need to restart it, will the problem occurs another time? Will it become a solution to restart the server?
I already restarted Reporting Services and nothing has changed.
Hi AllWondered if you could help.Basically I have 2 tables that contain all the data I want for my report,but I need to put it in a particular way and I need to display it in an ASPpage so my queries got to be manual rather than an MS Excel/Query 'munge'.To be honest, the report itself is very basic, so hopefully my ramble willmake sense. I need to report that shows 6 columns at best, 4 columns ifit's easier. Report looks like the following:Account Code - standard text fieldAccount Name - standard text fieldTurnover (Year to Date) 2002 - standard decimal number (single??) fieldTurnover (Year to Date) 2003 - standard decimal number (single??) field(not vital, but would be nice)Deviation as a straight figure between what the 2003 turnover figure isagainst the 2002 figure - ad hoc calc fieldDeviation as a % between what the 2003 turnover figure is against the 2002figure - ad hoc calc fieldMy table structure is as follows:TABLE 1 - ACCOUNTSThis contains all of the account codes (PK) and names as ACCOUNTID and NAMErespectively. It also contains a field called LEDGER which I would need touse in a Where clause to set this to 1 (1 = sales and 2 = purchases).TABLE 2 - ACCOUNTBUDGETSThis contains the Turnover details and is linked to the ACCOUNTS table by anACCOUNTID (FK??). This table contains a TURNOVER field for the actualturnover amount, a PERIOD field for the months of a year (eg, 1 - 12 - thatbeing Jan to Dec) and a YEAR field for the relevant years.In this ACCOUNTBUDGETS table it basically keeps a line-by-line record ofeach turnover for each period and year for each account code. As youprobably would with any transaction line storing table.An important part of this is that I want to show all of the Account codesand names that relate to LEDGER=1 even if they have no entries in theACCOUNTSBUDGETS table. The reason being is that I want to be able to showthat an account might not have traded for 2002 and therefore their 2003 Yearto date might be really good cos they've sold loads in 2003.So the final part is that I need summarise the Year to date figures next toeach account code and name. To do this I need to take what the month numberis now (eg, Dec = 12) and summarise all the turnover figures for 2002 upto12 and then all the turnover figures for 2003 upto 12. If you can imaginewhen this report is run in March the report would summarize from 1 to 3rather than 1 - 12 in the last examples.The nice bits on the end would be that they would give 2 different calcsagainst what the 2 turnover figures stated.The result should be something like the following:December Turnover YTDDeviationAcc No: Account Name 2003 2002 £%A001 Alpha Motor 9,250 5,398 3,85271%A003 A J V Secure 094 -1,294 -100%A004 Aye Gee 039 -4,239 -100%A007 P H Allin 2,23508 -1,973 -47%Any ideas??RgdsRobbie
I have an update query running which to just now has been running for 22 hours running on two tables 1 a lookuptable that has just been created within the batch the other a denormalised table for doing data analysis on
the query thats causing teh problem is
--//////////////////////////////////// this is the one thats running
Print 'Update Provider 04-05 EmAdmsCount12mths : ' + CAST(GETDATE() AS varchar) GO Update Provider_APC_2004_05 set EmAdmsCount12mths = (Select COUNT(*)-1 from Combined_Admissions where ((Combined_Admissions.NHSNumber = Provider_APC_2004_05.NHSNumber) or (Combined_Admissions.PASNUMBER = Provider_APC_2004_05.PDDISTNO)) and (Combined_Admissions.AdmDate BETWEEN DateAdd(yyyy,-1,Provider_APC_2004_05.AdmDate) AND Provider_APC_2004_05.AdmDate) AND Combined_Admissions.AdmMethod like 'Emergency%')-- and -- CA.NHSorPrivate = 'NHS')) FROM Provider_APC_2004_05, Combined_Admissions
any help in improving speed would be most welcome as there are 3 more of these updates to run right after this one and the analysis tables are almost double the size of this one
I have a report with a table and three columns. Whenever the data in one of the columns cannot fit on a single page it continues on the next page BUT, there is no header on the next page and the data in the other two columns repeats itself on the next page. (This behavior happens when I export to PDF)
Is this a known issue? I have tried every setting I could think of.
I have what should be simple question about related tables in a dataset and using those fields in a report. Here is my simple design.
Order Header -> Line Item -> Line Discount -> Discount Table
Now when designing this report I cannot seem to access the related discount records for the line item. (as more than one can be applied) Every time I try to drag an field from one of the tables in the dataset to my report it automatically adds "First()" onto the field value expression. This seems to work fine for the order header, but doen't even come close to getting the right discount on the line item? I basically need to pass through the Line Discount table to get to the discount name field to put on the same line as my line item data on the report.
I have looked and googled for for an example on this, but have come up short. Can anyone point me in the right direction?
This sounds like a pretty easy one. I have a SQL 2000 database with 2-3.4GHZ CPUs and 1GB of RAM. I have one database on it. I go in Query Analyzer on another machine and run a simple query like 'SELECT * FROM USERS' which should return 15,000 rows.
IT takes 30 (thirty) seconds to finish this query. OMG
Where do I start to decipher why on Earth this takes more than .01 seconds?
Hi, I have a query which has suddenly started responding slow. CAn anyone tell me what could be the possibilities? I tried update stats(I am on sql 70-though it's done auto but i did it manually again) I used union all in place of union but had no big effect.any othe thought? Thanks!
I have a query that takes minutes to execute, even through there are about 300,000 records are being processed. I would appreciate any help with optimizing that query. I have two tables: User and Usage. Table user has two fields: User_Id and Date_Created and a non-clustered index on User_Id. Table usage has two fields also: User_Id and Date_Used and non-clustered index on both fields. The User table is populated when the user registers. The Usage table is populated every time the user opens a document.
Here is what I need to do: get the number of users from the Usage table who opened a document at least once after they have registered during the last 30 days for each day in the time frame, where the time frame varies. For example, if the time frame is 8/01/00 - 8/31/00, I need to get the following data:
date returns ---- ------- 8/01/00 10 (10 users returned to the document between 7/2/00 and 8/1/00) 8/02/00 15 (15 users returned between 7/3/00 and 8/02/00) . . . 8/31/00 20 (20 users returned between 8/1/00 and 8/31/00)
Here is my query:
SELECT [date], (SELECT count(distinct user_id) FROM usage u JOIN [user] ON u.[user_id] = [user].[user_id] WHERE u.[date] BETWEEN usage.[date]-30 AND usage.[date] AND u.[date]>[user].date_created GROUP BY usage.[date])returns FROM usage WHERE [date] BETWEEN @date1 AND @date2
This query works fine, but too slow. We use MS SQL server 7.0.
I have a query which responds immediately when run however if I add an order by clause it takes 40 seconds. Below is the query with the order by clause SELECT distinct Licenseplate, platetypecode.platetypecode, platetypecode.platetypecodeid FROM Ticket INNER JOIN PlateTypeCode ON PlateTypeCode.PlateTypeCodeID = Ticket.PlateTypeCodeID ORDER BY licenseplate
The Ticket table contains approx. 11,000 records. I have created a nonclustered index for the licenseplate field, a 7 char varchar field. Any suggestions for speeding up the query?
The following query is causing some problems because it's taking too long to complete. I looked at the estimated execturion plan and I am unsure why it appears to spend over 50% of its time doing a 'Bookmark Lookup' on on particular column (SRA_SR_ID in the S_EVT_ACT table). There is an index on the column - S_EVT_F14. I'm not sure if the query is using the index properly. What can be done to specifically improve this particular problem? In general, does anyone have some suggestions for optimizing the query as a whole?
Thanks in advance. Clive
SELECT T1.APPT_REPT_FLG, T18.X_ALIS_ID, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.APPT_START_TM, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.APPT_START_TM, 8), T1.ASGN_USR_EXCLD_FLG, T2.NAME, T19.STAT_CD, T1.APPT_REPT_TYPE, T15.NAME, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_ACTL_END_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_ACTL_END_DT, 8), T1.TODO_CD, T1.X_DOC_CAT_ID, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_PLAN_START_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_PLAN_START_DT, 8), T1.TARGET_OU_ID, T7.ZIPCODE, T3.ZIPCODE, T9.EXP_RPT_NUM, T1.LAST_UPD_BY, T1.OWNER_PER_ID, T1.PART_RPR_ID, T1.RATE_LST_ID, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.APPT_REPT_END_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.APPT_REPT_END_DT, 8), T1.ACTIVITY_UID, T4.NAME, T1.PR_TMSHT_LINE_ID, T18.LAST_NAME, T7.ADDR, T18.SEX_MF, T1.BILLABLE_FLG, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_PLAN_END_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_PLAN_END_DT, 8), T1.SRA_SR_ID, T1.TARGET_PER_ADDR_ID, T18.X_FST_NAME, T1.EVT_STAT_CD, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.X_SCAN_DATE, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.X_SCAN_DATE, 8), T1.ROW_STATUS, T1.ACD_CALL_DURATION, T5.NAME, T8.FAX_PH_NUM, T8.X_FST_NAME, T8.LAST_NAME, T1.MODIFICATION_NUM, T1.X_CAMP_ID, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.X_SCAN_TIME, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.X_SCAN_TIME, 8), T1.ASSOCIATED_COST, T13.NAME, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.LAST_UPD, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.LAST_UPD, 8), T17.TMSHT_NUM, T1.PR_SYMPTOM_CD, T1.OPTY_ID, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T18.BIRTH_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T18.BIRTH_DT, 8), T1.PR_EXP_RPT_ID, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.APPT_START_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.APPT_START_DT, 8), T8.FST_NAME, T16.SR_NUM, T1.SRA_DEFECT_ID, T1.CREATED_BY, T8.WORK_PH_NUM, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.COST_EXCH_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.COST_EXCH_DT, 8), T1.CALL_ID, T1.X_CLIENT_ID, T1.PROJ_ID, T12.DEFECT_NUM, T1.CREATOR_LOGIN, T1.CONFLICT_ID, T19.OUTCOME_CD, T1.TEMPLATE_FLG, T2.PR_ADDR_ID, T1.PREV_ACT_ID, T1.X_DOC_NAME, T1.EXP_RLTD_FLG, T1.X_BATCH_REF, T1.PRI_LST_ID, T1.SRC_ID, T1.X_POLICY_REF, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.CREATED, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.CREATED, 8), T1.EMAIL_FORWARD_FLG, T11.DMT_NUM, T1.TMSHT_RLTD_FLG, T1.ROW_ID, T10.NAME, T18.CONSUMER_FLG, T1.TARGET_PER_ID, T18.FST_NAME, T1.PRIV_FLG, T3.PROVINCE, T8.X_ALIS_ID, T8.JOB_TITLE, T14.NAME, T1.NAME, T1.PCT_COMPLETE, T1.SRA_TYPE_CD, T1.ALARM_FLAG, T1.CAL_DISP_FLG, T1.EVT_PRIORITY_CD, T1.COST_CURCY_CD, T2.LOC, CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_ACTL_START_DT, 101) + ' ' + CONVERT (VARCHAR (10),T1.TODO_ACTL_START_DT, 8), T20.FILE_NAME, T1.SRA_RESOLUTION_CD, T6.PRDINT_ID, T1.OWNER_LOGIN FROM dbo.S_EVT_ACT T1 LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_ORG_EXT T2 ON T1.TARGET_OU_ID = T2.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_ADDR_ORG T3 ON T2.PR_ADDR_ID = T3.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_PRI_LST T4 ON T1.PRI_LST_ID = T4.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_PRI_LST T5 ON T1.RATE_LST_ID = T5.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_ACT_PRDINT T6 ON T1.ROW_ID = T6.ACTIVITY_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_ADDR_PER T7 ON T1.TARGET_PER_ADDR_ID = T7.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_CONTACT T8 ON T1.TARGET_PER_ID = T8.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_EXP_RPT T9 ON T1.PR_EXP_RPT_ID = T9.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_OPTY T10 ON T1.OPTY_ID = T10.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_PART_RPR T11 ON T1.PART_RPR_ID = T11.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_PROD_DEFECT T12 ON T1.SRA_DEFECT_ID = T12.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_PROD_INT T13 ON T6.PRDINT_ID = T13.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_PROJ T14 ON T1.PROJ_ID = T14.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_SRC T15 ON T1.SRC_ID = T15.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_SRV_REQ T16 ON T1.SRA_SR_ID = T16.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_TMSHT_LINE T17 ON T1.PR_TMSHT_LINE_ID = T17.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_CONTACT T18 ON T1.X_CLIENT_ID = T18.ROW_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_CAMP_CON T19 ON T1.X_CAMP_ID = T19.SRC_ID AND T1.TARGET_PER_ID = T19.CON_PER_ID LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.S_ACTIVITY_ATT T20 ON T1.ROW_ID = T20.PAR_ROW_ID WHERE ((T1.APPT_REPT_FLG != 'Y' OR T1.APPT_REPT_FLG IS NULL) AND (T1.TEMPLATE_FLG != 'Y' AND T1.TEMPLATE_FLG != 'P' OR T1.TEMPLATE_FLG IS NULL)) AND (T1.SRA_SR_ID = '1-EQLOO')
I have a query that is taking too long to run. It take 14 seconds to return 6800 rows. However, if I move the query out of a stored proc, it takes 1 second. I want to understand this issue and ideally fix the stored proc case.
I've simplified my actual queries for readability.
-- @filter is value to filter against or NULL to return all records. CREATE PROCEDURE queryPlayerStations(@filter INTEGER) AS SELECT * FROM MyTable -- Other joins and query logic omitted for brevity WHERE ((@filter IS NULL) OR (MyTable.Column = @filter)) GO
When I run the query directly in Query Analyzer, it runs very fast.
DECLARE @filter INTEGER SET @filter = NULL
-- Takes ~1 second to return 6800 rows. That's great performance SELECT * FROM MyTable -- Other joins and query logic omitted for brevity WHERE ((@filter IS NULL) OR (MyTable.Column = @filter))
When I put the parameters in the stored proc it runs fast.
CREATE PROCEDURE queryPlayerStations AS DECLARE @filter INTEGER SET @filter = NULL
SELECT * FROM MyTable -- Other joins and query logic omitted for brevity WHERE ((@filter IS NULL) OR (MyTable.Column = @filter)) GO
-- Takes ~1 second to return 6800 rows. That's great performance EXEC dbo.queryPlayerStations
Anyone have any ideas what I can do to improve the stored proc case?
i want to have a like search in the following query.
SELECT DISTINCT TOP 200 a.AccountID, a.AccountNumber, c.CLI, con.SurName, addr.Address1 [Account Address], addr.Postcode as [Account Postcode], atp.Name AS Type, cs.Code AS Status FROM account_t a INNER JOIN customer_t cust on a.customerID = cust.CustomerID INNER JOIN AccountType_T atp on cust.AccountTypeID = atp.AccountTypeID INNER JOIN CustomerStatus_T cs ON a.CustomerStatusID = cs.CustomerStatusID INNER JOIN Contacts_T con on cust.MasterContactID = con.ContactID INNER JOIN Address_T addr ON cust.MasterAddressID = addr.AddressID LEFT OUTER JOINCLI_T c ON a.AccountID = c.AccountID WHERE (c.CLI LIKE @CLI + '%') AND (con.SurName LIKE @Surname + '%') AND (addr.Address1 LIKE @Address + '%') AND (REPLACE(addr.Postcode, ' ', '') LIKE @Postcode + '%') AND c.DateArchived IS NULL
here all fields @CLI, @Surname, @Address, @Postcode are varhcar types...which is making this query very slow...is there any suggestion to improve this query?
