Slow SELECT Blocking Critical INSERTs
May 20, 2008
Our company records live sales into an SQL Server database. The same tables that store the sale information are also used by a reporting interface to query sales figures, but occasionally a SELECT generated by the reports is so slow that it causes the INSERT operations to time out and fail.
We've tried increasing the CommandTimeout property in .NET of the application performing the inserts, but despite it being set to 90 seconds, it's still not enough to prevent the occasional sale from failing to record which is a big no-no for us. We've run the Database Tuning Advisor on the stored procedure that generates the SELECT for the reports, and it is now fully optimized but still this isn't enough. The tables are quite massive (millions of rows) and the SELECT requires JOINs to other tables, some of which are in a separate database on the same server.
Is there a solution to this problem, aside from increasing the CommandTimeout property to the point where no timeout errors occur? My concern is that doing this could increase the number of concurrent connections and we'd hit another limit, so it's not really solving the problem. Is there a way to configure SQL Server to always favour INSERTs over SELECTs? The reporting users won't really care if the reports are slower but it's critical to get these INSERTs up to 100% reliability.
I'm not a DBA (just a developer) so I don't have an intricate knowledge of databases and this problem is a bit beyond my level of expertise. Obviously we don't want to re-design our entire system, but we'll do whatever necessary to ensure we aren't failing to record sales.
One idea I had, which may be awful I don't know, is to submit these sales to an MSMQ and write some software that will read from the queue and insert the records from there instead. We could then deal with the timeout issue by just re-submitting the sale until it is accepted, then removing it from the queue.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 9, 2014
We are noticing a lot of blocking when performing bulk inserts.
Sometimes the lead blocker(s) are blocking inserts into the same tables, but most of the time, it's insert to other tables. So, while bulk insert into table X is running, bulk insert into table Y is blocked from the insert into X.
- We turned off transactions from the application performing the bulk inserts - no change.
- We enabled table locking from the application - no change
- We enabled lock_on_bulk_load on the tables - this seems to have worked; however still see some blocking.
According to the lock_on_bulk article - When you specify table locking for a bulk import operation, a bulk update (BU) lock is taken on the table for the duration of the bulk-import operation, shouldn't we be seeing this BU lock? Instead, we see nothing but LCK_M_X (exclusive table locks).
Just found out that in order get a BU lock, no indexing can exist on the table ... sure be nice if that was in the article!
Also, we saw the exclusive locks happening before we made these changes, meaning it wasn't using the row locks that it should be by default. Assuming we're missing something here with lock escalation. I am profiling just for lock escalation, and it never happens ...
So I guess my pending question at this time is that why when inserting into table X do inserts into table Y get blocked?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2008
I am running MS SQL 2000 server. The table involved is only about10,000 records. But this is the behavior I am seeing.The local machine is querying the table looking for a particularrecord. Everything works fine.The remote amchine goes to clear the table and then insert all 10,000records, into the table the following happens.1) the local machines queries do not compilete until the remotemachine is done.2) the remote machine can take up to 6 minutes to do these 10,000insert operations. So nothing on the local machine works right forthese 6 minutes.I do not have access to the remote machines source to see what isrunning but I am told it is simply a for loop with a insert query init. Nothing of a locking natture.Any idea the types of things I should look for to track this down? Ifound this by doing SQL profiler profiling and finding the remoteoperations. Turn these operatiiosn off and the local machine worksfine again, with no other action.Thanks,David
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 1999
Hi list,
I'm a long time lurker on this list and really enjoy the discussions, although I rarely get a chance to participate.
Here is my situation: We are importing chunks of data (500 records at a time) from a C++ interface. The records have to be transformed before inserting into the target table which I am doing using a stored proc which is working fine. The records are in memory in C++ and the programmer is looping through the records building inserts into a temp table through ADO (which my proc picks up). The server business object is using the connection.execute method which is inserting one record at a time. That part of the process is taking over 15 seconds for 500 records which is the bulk of the total time.
My question is: Using ADO is there a better way to insert these records into the temp table? I see mention of a recordset interface but my programmers are new to ADO and since I am the DBA and have never used ADO, I am not sure what to tell them.
Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
shawn
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2004
Hi,
I am new to the windows world. We use Informatica on UNIX for ETL process. We have a requirement to load approx. 200,000 rows to a MS SQL Server table . The table is not that big and it is a heap table (no indexes). Inserts are taking 69 rows/per minute. We are using DataDirect Closed 4.10 SQL Server ODBC driver.
SQL Profiler tells us that is is doing a row by row processing and using sp_execute procedure.
Is there a way we can speed up the ODBC process?
-Thanks in advance
srv
SQL Server Version:
Microsoft SQL Server 2000 - 8.00.818 (Intel X86) May 31 2003 16:08:15 Copyright (c) 1988-2003 Microsoft Corporation Standard Edition on Windows NT 5.0 (Build 2195: Service Pack 4)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 5, 2007
Hello all. I've got a problem with really slow INSERTs on one (and only one) of the tables in a database. For example, using SQL Management Studio, it takes 4 minutes and 48 seconds to insert 25 rows. There are only about 8 columns in the table and only about 1500 records. All the other tables in the database are very fast for inserts.
Another odd thing uniquely associated with INSERTs on this table: prior to inserting the 25 new rows of data, SQL Management Studio tells me that it inserted 463 rows of data which I know did not happen. Here's the INSERT statement:
INSERT INTO FieldOps(StudySiteID
, QA_StructureID
, Notes
, PersonID)
SELECT DISTINCT StudySiteKey
, QA_StructureKey
, SampleComments1
, '25'
FROM ScriptOutput_Nitrate
WHERE (ScriptOutput_Nitrate.StudySiteKey IS NOT NULL)
and SQL Management Studio (eventually) says:
(463 row(s) affected)
(463 row(s) affected)
(25 row(s) affected)
The table has an index on the primary key (INT data type with auto increment). I tried running the following code to fix things but it made no difference:
USE [master]
GO
ALTER DATABASE [FieldData] SET SINGLE_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE
GO
use FieldData
GO
DBCC CHECKTABLE ('FieldOps', REPAIR_REBUILD) With ALL_ERRORMSGS
GO
USE [master]
GO
ALTER DATABASE [FieldData] SET MULTI_USER WITH ROLLBACK IMMEDIATE
GO
I'm guessing that the problem might be related to the index (??). I don't know... Does anyone here have a suggestion as to what I should do to fix this problem.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
I'm inserting 2 million+ records from a C# routine which starts outvery fast and gradually slows down. Each insert is through a storedprocedure with no transactions involved.If I stop and restart the process it immediately speeds up and thengradually slows down again. But closing and re-opening the connectionevery 10000 records didn't help.Stopping and restarting the process is obviously clearing up someresource on SQL Server (or DTC??), but what? How can I clean up thatresource manually?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Nov 29, 2000
We are inserting into a table, which includes an identity primary key column. When the table gets really large (i.e. 1.5 million records), the performance of the inserts reduce.
I noticed that when we insert into the table an exclusive lock on the table is obtained. Do inserts into tables with identities always lock the table?
Given the table size is unavoidable, does anyone have a suggestion to improve the performance?
Thanks,
Matt
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2002
Below given query is being executed on a Sql 2k box with 4CPU and 2GB RAM
testXX.DB_GRP.dbo.group1-----> is a sql 7 box with single CPU and 512MB RAM
The result set is abt 30,000 rows .
This whole Process is taking abt 5 mins to do the Insert Process.
Is there a way to optimise the query and bring down the execution time
insert into testXX.DB_GRP.dbo.group1
select num, group_num,group_desc from group2
where id = 20
---------------
If we just run the
select num, group_num,group_desc from group2
where id = 20
it takes 10 secs to execute this selct statement so i was wondering why it takes 5 mins to do the insert process across the network thru linked server query.
Any help would be appreciated?
Thanks,
MK
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2007
I'm relatively new to compact framework and SQL Server Compact so bear with me if I've got an obvious thing I've forgotten.
I've written my own database helper layer. My idea is to generate SQL Insert statements dynamically based on what is in the contents of each object. Peformance however is horrible. I try to do 1800 inserts and it takes about 50 seconds on the device (Release Build, outside of the IDE).
I pass in a list of objects to be inserted which derive from a ModelBase class. ModelBase includes some ORM information (what table the object goes into. what fields are mapped to which properties). I generate one SQLCeCommand object, one sql string (new params for each insert), and am using SqlCeResultResultSets.
What can I do to make this run faster? Thank you
Code Snippet
public bool Insert(List<ModelBase> recs)
{
SqlCeConnection con = new SqlCeConnection(connectionString);
try
{
con.Open();
con.BeginTransaction();
}
catch
{
return false;
}
SqlCeCommand cmd = new SqlCeCommand();
cmd.Connection = con;
String sqlString = "INSERT INTO [" + recs[0].tableName + "] (";
String sqlString2 = ") VALUES (";
PropertyInfo[] props = recs[0].GetType().GetProperties();
for (int x = 0; x < props.Length; x++)
{
PropertyInfo pi = props[x];
if (recs[0].fieldMap.ContainsKey(pi.Name))
{
sqlString += "[" + recs[0].fieldMap[pi.Name] + "]";
sqlString2 += "@" + pi.Name;
sqlString += ", ";
sqlString2 += ", ";
}
}
sqlString = sqlString.Substring(0, sqlString.LastIndexOf(", "));
sqlString2 = sqlString2.Substring(0, sqlString2.LastIndexOf(", "));
sqlString += sqlString2 + ")";
cmd.CommandText = sqlString;
cmd.CommandType = CommandType.Text;
foreach (ModelBase rec in recs)
{
cmd.Parameters.Clear();
for (int x = 0; x < props.Length; x++)
{
PropertyInfo pi = props[x];
if (rec.fieldMap.ContainsKey((pi.Name)))
{
if (pi.GetValue(rec, null) == null)
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@" + pi.Name, DBNull.Value);
else
cmd.Parameters.AddWithValue("@" + pi.Name, pi.GetValue(rec, null));
}
}
try
{
SqlCeResultSet rs = cmd.ExecuteResultSet(ResultSetOptions.None);
}
catch(Exception e)
{
cmd.Connection.Close();
cmd.Connection.Dispose();
Program.log.Error(e.Message,e);
return false;
}
}
con.Close();
return true;
}
View 7 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2007
Hi all,
This managed application was written to run on a Symbol 3090 Win CE 5.0 scanning device. We are using the symbol provided classes to access the scanning interface, and SQL Compact database on the device to collect the scanned data, and then using merge replication to synchronize scanned data when the device is docked. The problem we have experienced seems to be releated to the performance when inserting and updating records in the database.
We have tested some randomly generated 1000 records and inserting/updatating into a database. At first the time to commit a record increases when the database is flushing into the memory (The flush interval in the connection string property is 10 seconds by default). and then as the database size grows increasing the time to commit every single record which is causing the application to perform slowly as they scan items into the database. However, the device program memory remains consistant as they are scan items. From our tests, I found the time to execute either a update/insert command on 2MB sqlMobile database (upto 10000 records, depending on the size of the columns) is taking nearly 2 to 2 and half seconds to complete. Below is the only code I am executing,
If Not sqlObj.UpdateItem(1061022, itemNo, 1) Then
sqlObj.InsertResultSet(1061022, itemNo, itemObj.Style, itemObj.Color, itemObj.Size, itemObj.Description, 0, 1)
End If
For the notes, I am using prepared updated command and resultset.insert methods to perform update and insert commands into the database.
Any help on this issue is highly appreciated.
Thanks
Ravi.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2005
My table looks like this:char(150) HTTP_REF,char(250) HTTP_USER,char(150) REMOTE_ADDR,char(150) REMOTE_HOST,char(150) URL,smalldatetime TIME_STAMPThere are no indexes on this table and there are only 293,658 records total.When I do a select like this it takes forever:SELECT COUNT(DISTINCT REMOTE_ADDR)Takes 2 minutes. Is there anyway to speed that up?Thanks
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hello.I test some query on sql server 2000 (sp2 on OS windows 2000) and iwant to know why a simple query like this :select * from Table Where Column like '%value'is more slow on 2000 than on sql 7.And this case arrive only if the % character is in the begin.If you test this :select * from Table Where Column like 'v%alue'then it's more fast on 2000.I look the execution plan, there is a difference but this differenceis the same in all the case i test (for the two query i write in thismessage for example).I don't understand why and so, if someone have an explanation, andperhaps a solution ...Excuse my poor english language.And thanks for time people spend to answer me.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
hello,I have the following query. it returns result in less than 1 second.select *from employee e, address awhere e.id=a.emp_idand e.id=1234The problem is that it becomes extremely slow if i take the last lineout. So the query looks like:select *from employee e, address awhere e.id=a.emp_idThe above query is only supposed to return ~500 rows. but i stillhaven't got the result back after 30 minutes.Does anyone have any suggestions about troubleshooting this problem?Thank you in advance!Eddy
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2007
The following stored procedure is run whenever someone searches my database. When I first created the site, this search took less than 3 seconds. Now, there is more data in the system and the search is taking over 30 seconds.
I am not very good with SQL and I'm sure I am doing some dumb things. Is there a better way to write this query to speed things up?
Thanks a lot,
Chris MessineoSET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
-- =============================================
-- Author:Chris Messineo
-- Create date: 4/27/2007
-- Description:Get Search
-- =============================================
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[Search]
@Keyword as varchar(40)=NULL
AS
BEGIN
SELECT
Script.Title,
Script.ScriptID,
Script.Logline,
Member.Name
FROM
Script
Join Contest on (Script.ContestID=Contest.ContestID)
Join ScriptComment on (Script.ScriptID=ScriptComment.ScriptID)
Join Member on (Script.MemberID=Member.MemberID)
WHERE
(Title like '%' + COALESCE(@Keyword, Title) + '%' or
Logline like '%' + COALESCE(@Keyword, Logline) + '%' or
Comments like '%' + COALESCE(@Keyword, Comments) + '%')
GROUP BY
Script.Title,
Script.ScriptID,
Script.Logline,
Member.Name
ORDER BY
Title
END
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2000
SELECT * on a 4000 row table is taking more than 12 seconds.
Other larger tables are not nearly as slow.
I've DBCC dbreindex'd, and dbcc showcontig shows density at 100%.
How can I figure out why this is happening?
What are some remedies?
Thanks for your help.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2007
I have a SELECT TOP query in order to return x number of top records from a table which has the indexing service enabled on it, such as this :
SELECT TOP(15) * FROM [TableName] ORDER BY [ColumnName]
and also there are not that many records(MAX 100 rows) kept in the table at the moment however, it will grow later.
The issue stems out from the ORDER BY [ColumnName] part of the syntax that changes the TOP selection order which makes the query to run very slow as I have also analyzed in the SQL SERVER QUERY ANALYZER.
Anyhow, I need to have the ORDER BY statement to show the data based on different columns either ascending or descending.
There might we workarounds to achieve the same goal that I am not aware of.
Any thoughts is appreciated.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 15, 2006
Dear MS SQL Experts,I have to get the number of datasets within several tables in my MSSQL2000 SP4 database.Beyond these tables is one table with about 13 million entries.If I perform a "select count(*) from table" it takes about 1-2 min toperform that task.Since I know other databases like MySQL which take less than 1 sec forthe same taskI'm wondering whether I have a bug in my software or whether there areother mechanisms to get the number of datasets for tables or the numberof datasets within the whole database.Can you give me some hints ?Best regards,Daniel Wetzler
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2007
Hello... im having a problem with my query optimization....
I have a query that looks like this:
SELECT * FROM table1
WHERE location_id IN (SELECT location_id from location_table WHERE account_id = 998)
it produces my desired data but it takes 3 minutes to run the query... is there any way to make this faster?... thank you so much...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2001
In an ASP, I have a dynamically created SQL statement that amounts to "SELECT * FROM Server1.myDB.dbo.myTable WHERE Col1 = 1" (Col1 is the table's primary key). It returns the data immediately when executed.
However, when the same record is updated with "UPDATE Server1.myDB.dbo.myTable SET Comments = 'blah blah blah' WHERE Col1 = 1", the page times out before the query can complete.
I watched the program in Profiler, and I saw on the update that sp_cursorfetch was being executed as an RPC once per each row in the table. In a table of 78000 records, the timeout occurs well before the last record is fetched, and the update bombs.
I can run the same statements in Query Analyzer from a linked server and have the same results. The execution plan shows that a Remote Query is occurring on the select that returns 1 row, and a Remote Scan is taking place on the update scanning 78000 rows (I guess this is where all the sp_cursorfetch calls are happening...?).
How can I prevent the Remote Scan? How can I prevent the execution of the RPC sp_cursorfetch for each row in the remote table?
Thank you!
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2007
I have 32-BIT MS SQL 2005 running on Windows 2003 R2 platform. The code is 100% bug-free and works fine on staging and production. Production has an issue AT RANDOM TIMES. Most of the time, it works fine...connections are pooled and reused. Out of nowhere (very randomly), it will start opening new connections for each request and keep doing that until the DB server crashes (could not open connection exception). If I restart IIS, it works fine again...all connections are being reused (no more than 6 connections). Just for fun, I restarted IIS again....it starts opening new connections for each request!! I restarted again, it now reuses existing connections. What's going on??? This has occurred 2 times on our production box. .NET ALSO has a SERIOUS bug where if you nest master pages or user controls, sometimes it will throw a compilation error on a LIVE site (microsoft admits that it's a bug in the engine and currently...there is NO FIX for it..there are patches...none of them work).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 1999
I get this error when I try to access one of my tables.
Msg 605, Level 21, State 1
Attempt to fetch logical page 4377 in database 'maillist' belongs to object '1340531809', not to object 'client'.
I know that when my database is restarted it will be marked suspect because of this error.
Does anybody know:
What causes this error?
Why I keep on getting it?
How do you fix it?
Is anybody even reading this?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 9, 2007
Greetings,
I am having a big issue now. I made what I thought would be a simple change to our reporting services application, which has been running smoothly for about 2 years. The change has caused my "forms authentication" to start throwing an error that I rember from a while back while testing. Our rporting server is down, sad to say. Has anyone had this problem.
The error : Client found response content type of 'text/html; charset=utf-8', but expected 'text/xml'.
The request failed with the error message:...
Changes made
1. Stoped RS web app in IIS
2. Changed the ASP.NET Config Settings(Report Server App)
a. Authentication Tab - cookie time out (changed to 60)
b. State Manegement Tab - Session Time Out (changed to 60)
3. Changed the ASP.NET Config Settings(Our aps.net app that displays the reports)
a. Authentication Tab - cookie time out (changed to 60)
b. State Manegement Tab - Session Time Out (changed to 60)
4. Changed the SessionState Timeout property in the web config file in our web app that displays the reports.
5. Restarted the Report Server app.
6. Recycled the app pools
Could not log in!
I am catching the above error in my web app's ReportExecution.LogonUser().
I rebooted the server and continue to get sqldump logs and this exception. This error occured when I was testing the redirect a while back but that issue was resolved. The only changes I have made are above.....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 16, 2008
hi,
i had a query like this ,
source flat file containg row having length 803, frm that i parse the fields of diff lengths ,record type field is one of them,
after flat file i took derived column to parse the record types(i.e type1,type2, .......)
later i took conditional split and split those record types in to diff derived columns,
problem starts now ?
i got 500 records before conditional split and after condi..split.. they r 499,
i dont know wat happened to that 1 record.
plz help me regarding this issue........
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2007
Hi all of you,
Does anyone ever face this sort of error? We were launching a SSIS from our .Net console:
0x80070002 while loading package file "C:Documents and Settingsadminsql2k5Local SettingsApplication DataMicrosoftSQL ServerSmoInnerPackage.dtsx". The system cannot find the file specified.
InnerPackage.dtsx is a sort of template for SSIS??
Thanks indeed,
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2007
Dear all
I am a pretty new in the development world fresh from uni. I am doing development on a system that has a security database. Access to the data in that database is pretty important. So in case the main server where the database is stored for soem reason fails or gets compromised i need to have a second copy with the most recent data in that database and keep the application up and running. The data i have is stored in a SQL 2005 database. What are the recomended aproaches for acheiving this needed reliability?
Would running the SQL Agent every 2 minutes do the trick? And replicate the database to another server and then have asecondary deployment on that server running as a backup? Or are there any other means?
Any advice is apreciated.
Sincerely
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2008
Publc role has been grannted 'SELECT' privelege to syslogins and sysusers tables in the Master and GTSS database
The syslogins table contains all the logins that were created on the server. The sysusers table contains the users that are mapped to the database. Unauthorised access to these tables would reveal critical authentication info of other users
Restrictive permissions should be configured on critical database tables such as sysusers and syslogin.
How to set this.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2008
Our SQL server keeps crashing with the following error. When it crashed it completely shut down the server. Could you please give me advice on how to stop this from happening again? I would like to thank in advance for your help.
A MS DTC component has encountered an internal error. The process is being terminated. Error Specifics: A non-MS DTC XA Library threw an exception in function olog
ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet + 0x0
+ 0xd58c3c0
For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
Here is the information of our server
OS Name Microsoft(R) Windows(R) Server 2003, Standard Edition
Version 5.2.3790 Service Pack 1 Build 3790
Other OS Description Not Available
OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation
System Name SQL2387
System Manufacturer Dell Computer Corporation
System Model PowerEdge 2850
System Type X86-based PC
Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 3 GenuineIntel ~3790 Mhz
Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 3 GenuineIntel ~3790 Mhz
Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 3 GenuineIntel ~3790 Mhz
Processor x86 Family 15 Model 4 Stepping 3 GenuineIntel ~3790 Mhz
BIOS Version/Date Dell Computer Corporation A04, 9/22/2005
SMBIOS Version 2.3
Windows Directory C:WINDOWS
System Directory C:WINDOWSsystem32
Boot Device DeviceHarddiskDmVolumesSQL2387Dg0Volume1
Locale United States
Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "5.2.3790.1830 (srv03_sp1_rtm.050324-1447)"
User Name Not Available
Time Zone Eastern Standard Time
Total Physical Memory 4,095.08 MB
Available Physical Memory 1.75 GB
Total Virtual Memory 1.83 GB
Available Virtual Memory 3.81 GB
Page File Space 2.00 GB
Page File C:pagefile.sys
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 11, 2006
Hi all of you,
This post is related with this one, previously opened:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=620243&SiteID=1
Moreover, this post is related too (IMHO) with
http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=430406&SiteID=17
Following with my research I've seen that DTS.DLL is installed on:
1)My root c:
2)%systemroot%system32
2)c:archivos de programa...90
3)c:archivos de programa...80
It seems that BIDS is trying to call, at first, to this COM CCW component.
So that, all has been deleted phsyically from my workstation and unregistered.
Sql Server 2005 full installation again and... the problem lives yet.
I'm desperate
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2004
Hi Friends,
We developed an application in the ASP.Net with C#.
We are going to do a task in the transaction.
It is working perfectly. But if two users comes simultaneously, then
It gives an exception that Transaction is already commited.
First transaction Commited Successfully.
When Second transaction goes to Commit()
Then it generate this error.
We are unable to find this problem Whether this is problom from SQL Server or DOTNET.
Pls give ur suggestions.
Thanks and waiting a helpful response.
Sachin
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 7, 2002
We need to apply the transactional log for business hours (9-5) everyday to a oracle instance which will be seeded with SQL Data for once. And then every day the transactional log would be applied.
We need to do this as eventually this server is moving to oracle.
At this point if somebody could help me to read the transactional log that would be great.
Thanks,
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 4, 2004
Please any one can help me ?I have multiuser application ( VB 6.0 ) on SQL Server 2000 running.
Last night my Sql Server was writting info on the Log file of one database when the power accidentally shut down. In fact, the server was executing one Microsoft Data Transformation Service ( DTS ) which transfers data from one table to another.
This morning when the users tried to work with this database everything went wrong... I've not been able to attach MDF AND LDF files to SQL Server 2000 Desktop Engine.
Looking for what happened I found those Info/Error LOG events:
A)Starting up database 'pcserveis'.
B)ex_raise2: Exception raised, major=34, minor=48, severity=21, attempting to create symptom dump
C) "The transaction ( Process Id 5 ) was left in "interblockade" in Lock
resources with another process and was chosen as subject of the "interblockade". Execute the transaction again." ( Sorry about wrong words , i'm using a translation tool from spanish )
D) Could not undo log record (5019077:221:133), for transaction ID (0:15254626), on page (1:1917), database 'pcserveis' (database ID 11). Page information: LSN = (5019072:426:5), type = 1. Log information: OpCode = 2, context 1.. ( Error: 3448, Severity: 21, State: 1)
E)Error while undoing logged operation in database 'pcserveis'. Error at log record ID (5019077:221:133).. (Error: 9004, Severity: 23, State: 7)
F)An error occurred while processing the log for database 'pcserveis'..
What can i do to restore my database? Thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2007
Hi,
I'm upgrading a new dedicated sql server 2005 (64 bit) box that I just got to SP2. After I install SP2 there is 1 critical update.
Critical Update for SQL Server 2005 Service Pack 2 (KB 934458)
When I install this, it says the installation has failed. I have uninstalled it and tryed reinstalling but I get the same result.
It's listed in the control panel as a program I can remove, however in windows update history it says it has failed. Also in windows update I no longer have the option to install it again, as though it has installed properly.
Anybody have these issues before? I'm not sure if its installed OK or not.
Thanks!
mike123
View 1 Replies
View Related
