Slow Access Unless Administrator Account
Jun 27, 2006
We have an issue with accessing SQL Server 2000 where the access of data from the database is slow unless the user is logged in as an administrator to their computer.
The system is as follows: SQL Server 2000 on a W2K server. Users logging into a Win 2003 domain server. Users using W2K on their workstations. Application is VB.NET using the Enterprise Library Data Block, connection pooling ON, and windows authentication.
We are assuming that the issue is down to one of authentication and that when a user is set as an administrator then they have instant access. We have been able to replicate the issue using just SQL server on a W2K workstation and accessing from another W2K workstation. Again data access is way slow unless the account is an administrator.
Glad of any ideas folks!
Kind Regards
Ian Logan
View 10 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 27, 2006
Hello,
I use SQL Server 2005 Express and VB.Net for my client server application. From a client machine, if the user is logged on as Windows Administrator, my application connects to the database server just fine. If the client is logged on as a non-administrator, then my app cannot connect. Here is my connection string:
"Server=ServerNameSQLEXPRESS;Database=DBName;Trusted_Connection=True;Connection Timeout=30"
I use TCP/IP.
How can I fix this? Any help will be appreciated.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2007
Hello,
I seem to have lost the ability to access the site settings as well as any security tabs and modify the properties under the directories etc...somehow i have lost administrator access , how do i get this back? I am still local administrator of the server reporting services is running on...only thing i can think off that could of done this is i installed Sharepoint onto the same machine and created a sharepoint site...are there things i can check in IIS or RS or etc to get this admin access back
thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2007
Hi,
I have Reporting Services set up with the permissions (via Right Click Server/Permisions in SSMS or System Role Assignments in Report Manager) set as follows:
BUILTINAdministrators - System Administrator
When logged in as an administrator I am able to access Report Manager, no problem.
However, I want to add a new group so that non-administrators can access Report Manager. However, whatever new item I add in the permissions appears to have no effect. For instance, if I add a permission for Users, i.e. :
BUILTINAdministrators - System Administrator
BUILTINUsers - System Administrator
I can still only access Report Manager as an administrator.. Any other user just gets the blank page.
I have tried creating a custom group, Report Users, with the same result.
I checked IIS to ensure anonymous access was turned off (this was an issue I had earlier on in my setup - it was turned on, but is now firmly off).
I don't know much about IIS, but I guess the problem is there somewhere. Does anybody have any idea what the problem could be and how I get around it?
Thanks very much in advance
Andy
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2008
This is a slight re-stating from an older thread, which I think warrants some new discussion. The answer has always been that system administrators should have full access to everything on a system, including databases.
Although that is a logical position for internal IT departments it doesn't quite fit the model of systems with outsourced or external system support.
"If you don't trust your DBA, then you need a new DBA. They are in a position of authority for a reason and restricting that authority makes it impossible for them to do the job they are hired to do."
What about scenarios where you have local machine administrators that should NOT be given access to private data in a secured database, even though they need to be able to access and maintain everything else? And unfortunately some regulations are written about access to stored data whether encrypted or not...
In the modern world of Sarbanes-Oxley and PCI-DSS/CISP it is no longer so cut and dried. Especially where companies have software/hardware support contracts with third parties that require administrative access to other aspects of the systems.
So accepting that you might need someone to have administrative level access to the box but they should not be able to view the contents of a database installed on that box, what would you do?
Is there a way to create an adminstrative group that does not allow access to a specific named instance of SQL?
Is there a way to revoke access for one member of the administrators group only?
Thanks,
Ted
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 16, 2002
We are trying to set up SQLAgent Proxy account. If the SQLServer service id is a domain admin, do we still have to add it to the local administrators group?
Jeff
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2005
Please help! I am new in SQL Server 2000 Administration. My manager had ask me to manage a SQL Server, but Windows Adminstrator refuse to give me Local Admin rights. I only have sa account to login to databases. I don't know any excuses or reasons to give to Windows Adminstrator so that he can give me the local admin rights. If any one have this answer, please help. Thank you.
-JC
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 5, 2006
During install of SQL Server 2005, we can of course use a domain account or the built-in system account for running the services. I lean toward domain for obvious reaons but would like to know a +/- to each option and why I'd choose one over the other and what consequences or limitations one may encounter if I choose one over the other.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 28, 2005
What is the best way of accessing a sql server on a live server? shall I use Integrated windows or use a special user account? If I use a user account, what are the needed priviledges to give it?
thank you
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
is there a way to limit the access of an sa account?
ex. preventing the sa acct. to view a table defenition or drop a table
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2007
Hello,
I am seeing a couple of domain/username accounts trying to access SQL 2k5 SP2 and get the error above. The concern I have is these accounts shouldn't be trying to access SQL at all and do not exist is SQL hence the error The question I have is how can I track down what is trying to use this account and connect to sql? Thanks in advance.
John
SQL Server Log:
Message
Login failed for user 'DOMAIN ampbell'. [CLIENT: <named pipe>]
Message
Error: 18456, Severity: 14, State: 27.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2004
Hi All,
I have a SQL server, as I use a domain account to log on to SQL server and Sql server agent, all maintanence plans work good, since I changed from a domain into Localsystem account to log on to SQL server, and Sql server agent, all maintanence plans didn't work any more, then I tried only keep Localsystem account at SQl server , using a domain log on to Sql server agent, but it's still failed to maintanence plans. The error in job history is"Executed as user: candyl. sqlmaint.exe failed. [SQLSTATE 42000] (Error 22029). The step failed.". And the message at Sql server log is :"BackupDiskFile::CreateMedia: Backup device 'D:Database BackupsNoon BackupESMDEV_db_200406141548.BAK' failed to create. Operating system error = 5(Access is denied.)". It looks like permission problem, but for Localsystem account which should has full permission, right? I tried may ways and searched from knowledge base , still couldn't find the related solution.
Anyone can give me some advices?
Thanks.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
Hi All hope you can help.I have a SQL 2k Standard Ed. SP3 server that is in mixed securitymode.I have logged into EM with the sa account.Then added a Active Directory group (i.e. DomainDBAdmins) to theSystem Administrators for that server.When I try and modify the SQL server registration in EM to use trustedauthentication instead of sa I get a connection failed. Any ideas?Thanks,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2008
Hello,
We have SQL Server 2005 with 300+ databases in it. It was set up by the conractor. How can I create new account with read-only access to all databases? Is there any "quick" method of doing it (like in Sybase, it is very easy). I've created new login, but I do not see where can I set up the permissions properly. Thanks
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2005
I'm creating one of my first asp.net pages, and it accesses an MS SQL database.It runs fine locally, but if you go to it remotely through a web browser, you get an exception saying that the database login failed for user ASPNET.My brother told me to do the following in SQL Server Managment studio. It seems I don't have that program installed, so I did it from the SQL command prompt.CREATE LOGIN [bigblueASPNET] FROM WINDOWSuse AdventureWorkscreate user [bigblueASPNET](Where "bigblue" is the computer name and "AdventureWorks" is the database my asp.net web page reads from).This only partially fixed the problem - now when you open the page remotely and try to access the DB I get an error message saying that permission to use the SELECT command is denied.I searched on these forums, and found this:http://forums.asp.net/69166/ShowPost.aspxFor future reference, let's call what my brother told me "Method 1" and what the previous poster did as "Method 2."I haven't tried method 2 because I don't know exactly what I am giving ASPNET permission to do. Does method 2 enable ASPNET to do anything to any database? It seems method 1 is more secure, as from the commands I could already tell it only has permission to access AdventureWorks.So, I'd prefer to use method 1. Can anyone tell me what further commands I can use to give ASPNET permission to do specific actions?If I can't figure out method 1 and have to do method 2, how can I undo what I did in method 1?Thanks!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2007
I am trying to connect to a sql server from my asp.net application via windows authentication using the Network Service account. When I try to create a login for the ComputerNameNetwork Service account I get the following error.
I know I haven't mistyped it because I clicked the check names button and it showed as a valid id.
So what gives?
TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Express
------------------------------
Create failed for Login 'PREMIERDCNetwork Service'. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.Smo)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=9.00.3042.00&EvtSrc=Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.ExceptionTemplates.FailedOperationExceptionText&EvtID=Create+Login&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Express.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
Windows NT user or group 'PREMIERDCNetwork Service' not found. Check the name again. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 15401)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.3042&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=15401&LinkId=20476
------------------------------
BUTTONS:
OK
------------------------------
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 22, 2015
I'm trying to connect to a database using a service account that we got created. The ID is an AD account and was added to the db as such. When I try to connect to the database using the account with the password I get [login failed for domainid]. The DBA mentioned that its setup to use windows auth, however, I can't connect with this service account using windows Auth, due to I'm using to connect via code.
How can I connect to the database from my code using this ID?
I have the ID and pwd in my code to connect with, does the ID have to be setup differently in the Database?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2015
I have a question about ssrs security. In report manager I have set a list of users as browsers, and the builtin administrators are content manager in the parent folder where reports are. A user that is not an administrator and neither a user I added, has access to reports.
I'm thinking this person is having access because the data source of the reports use a administrator account to connect to the analysis services using the option Credentials stored securely in the report server with the 2 checkboxes marked (use as windows credentials when connecting to the data source and impersonate the authenticated user).
I simply marked this option because SSRS is in 1 server and SSAS in other and I think kerberos need to be configured and I haven't looked into it, but I think the report access is separated from the data source.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2002
I am experiencing VERY slow connectivity between client and server SQL 2000. I have checked the network activity and it is low. It also takes Enterprise manager ages to load, and then browsing tables and trees is impossible!
HELP!!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2004
I have a access database, the data store in another server. This noon, one of our user is runing the access database too slow. Open the database and search the data, etc. It took a long time to come out, Any body has experience on it, why, we had etrust install on each user machine, is that cause this too slow? Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2008
Has anyone else exported data to Access? If so, is it a slow process in SQL Server 2005?
I am exporting 3,000 records to an Access database using a view and it has taken 20 minutes. I am using the Export Data wizard. Any tips on how to speed it up would be appreciated.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2007
I have 25+ WinXP SP2 workstations on a Novell file server (Novell login) and also have a W2K SQL 2000 Server for our database. We are usint Win NT authentication to the SQL Server.
One AND ONLY ONE user is having trouble with this setup. Her workstation is PAINFULLY slow accessing the SQL server through my Delphi programs, through our third party programs, and through ODBC connections.
I thought it was her workstation until I configured a clean workstation for her, and it too had the same problem. I then took a brand new Dell 9200 workstation with 2gb memory, gigabit NIC, etc. and configured it to use our servers. It too had the same slowness connecting to the SQL server. Everything else is fast.
I deleted her entry in the NT domain users table, and re-entered her. No help.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 3, 2007
Hii,
A bit new to SQL 2k5 but here goes, I recently installed SQL 2k5 on a preety decent box with about 4GB Ram and created a database called PointOfSale. As probably obvious by now, the application that accesses the Database is a PointOfSale application.
The store sells ladies clothing items, of which each is barcoded.
When an item is scanned via the barcode reader into the application, it takes like about 10-15 seconds for the item information to appear. Of course the item information resides on the database.
There are three registers and the same thing happens on all. I am running sp 2 for sql2k5 already.
Any thing I can do that would reduce the 15 sec delay significantly?
Any help at all would be appreciated immensley.
Regards,
Burt.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2007
Hi, I hope you can help.I have configured a Windows 2003 web server and SQL 2005 Server (on same box) to successfully allow remote connections and to allow access via SQL Server Management Studio Express 2005.The problem I have is that I want to restrict access to the databases on the server via the Management Studio to specific databases e.g. 1 database user "sees" only 1 database.I can configure it so that the user's remote access permissions do not allow access to other databases but they can still "see" the database listed in the Management Studio explorer.I can also configure it so that the users cannot see all the databases (by disabling View All Databases on SQL Server), but this means that they cannot not see their own database which they have permissions for.Is it impossible to have the desired behaviour of only displaying the database which the remote user accessing has permissions for and hiding all other databases?I have MSN'd,Googled and Yahoo'd this one to no avail :(Many thanksFergus
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2006
I have one aspx page that is very slow loading it is connected to SQL 2005 database. I am looking for any preformance tips out there
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 27, 2001
We have several people accessing the SQL server 7.0 data thru' MS Access Server has been slow on queries etc.Everything looks good,other than this one finding of MS Access being used for update/select. Is MS Access a potential problem? How to solve the problem of slow response time?
Note: MS Access is running on the client desktops retrieving data from SQL Server and joining data from MS Access to SQL Server.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 26, 2000
I have a stored procedure which creates 3 temporary tables. Every table is about ten rows and 25 columns. The inserts in the tables goes fast (< 30 ms). The selects from them is also that fast. BUT the first select takes about 3200 ms one each of the temptables. (I first do insert, then select from them.) So the SP executes at about 13 seconds instead of 3.
Any suggestions, anyone, please?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2006
Hi,
I have migrated my app from VB to VB.Net. A 3-tier app with remoting and COM+.
I am experiencing a long wait time of about 3 times higher than what it would take in the VB App.
I am using DataAdapter.FiLL method to fill the datatable.
I have tried.
Using DataReader ( Made the things worse )
Using BeginLoadData and EndLoadData
Creating a Dataset and calling fill with the dataset so that the round trip to the middletier is saved to bring the SQL.
But i feel now that whatever is done. the problem is with the fill method only?
Is there any alternative?
Please suggest. It is one of the most important thing which if not possible may lead to scrapping up idea of upgrading to .Net.
Shri
View 10 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2008
I have a table that has appx 3.2 million rows. see sp_help
Name Owner Type Created_datetime
-------------------------------------------------------------------
TB_SAAI014_BPD dbo user table 2005-08-10 11:33:23.893
Column_name Type Comp Lngth Prec Scale Nullable
------------------------------------------------------------------------
RowID int no 4 10 0 no
SPHInstID int no 4 10 0 no
BPDInstID int no 4 10 0 no
BMUID varchar no 11 no
InfoImblCfw numeric no 9 12 2 no
BMUPrdNonDel numeric no 9 12 2 no
PrdFPN numeric no 9 13 3 no
PrdBMUBalSrvVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
PrdInfoImblVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
PrdExpdMtrVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
BMUMtrVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
PrdBMUNonDelBidVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
PrdBMUNonDelOfrVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
TranLossFctr numeric no 9 15 7 no
TranLossMtpl numeric no 9 15 7 no
TradUnitName varchar no 30 no
TotTrdUnitMtrVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
BMUAppBalSrvVol numeric no 9 13 3 no
DTCreated datetime no 8 yes
DTUpdated datetime no 8 yes
Identity Seed Inc Not Repl
-----------------------------------------
RowID 0 1 0
RowGUIDcol
-----------------------------
No rowguidcol column defined.
Data Located on File Group
==========================
PRIMARY
Index Name Decsription Keys
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
idx_SPH_BPD clustered, unique located on PRIMARY SPHInstID, BPDInstID
This table has 1 clustered index based on its own unique record ID and that of its parent table record
I have an import process that adds appx 980 rows of data to this table and numerous rows to several other tables as part of a transaction and it ran in about 15 seconds.
However we suffered a server failure and it had to be rebuilt (Svr2k3), SQL 2000 re-installed (with default options) and the data base restored.
The same transaction is now taking 8 to 9 minutes.
I tracked it down to this particular table. Just doing a count(*) takes over 5 minutes. Select * where ID = 1 takes over 5 mins. Also, whenever the table is accessed you can hear the server thrashing the disks. Other tables, although smaller do not seem to be suffering from this masive performance drop..
I've tried droping and recreating the index. I have even created a copy of the table, with index, and still get the same issue with speed.
DBCC CHECKTABLE returns the following but takes 6 and a half minutes
DBCC results for 'TB_SAAI014_BPD'.
There are 3168460 rows in 72011 pages for object 'TB_SAAI014_BPD'.
DBCC execution completed. If DBCC printed error messages, contact your system administrator.
No errors are shown
A DBCC CHECKTABLE on another table with 230 thousand rows, run at the same time only took 10 seconds
Can anyone please point me in the direction of things to check, try or repair.
Any help greatfully recieved.
Jinx1966
View 10 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2015
How can I create a SQL authentication account with read-write access to only 1 table in a SQL database.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2006
Hi
Here is the brief to my problemWe had our database on SQL Server 2000 and Windows 2000.This machine
had 2gb of RAM and dual Penitum 3 processors and about 25-30 users were
connected all the time. The size of database is around 2 gb. Even on this setup
rate of data retrival was good, never had any issues. We moved to SQL Server 2005 and Windows 2003. This machines has
2 Pentium Xeon 3.4 processors and 2 stick of KINGSTON 1024 MB 333
MHZ DDR DIMM ECC CL2.5 DUAL RANK X4 INTEL. The rate of data
retrival is awful and its very slow. It using about 1.7 to 1.9 gb of RAM all the
time. Page File usage is about 2.07 gb and Virtual Usage is about 1.7gb.I dont quiet understand why is it so slow to get data. We use bespoke software,
so nothing has changed there. Hardware specification of our server is far more better then the recommended
system requirement for SQL Server 2005.Am i missing something out or i havent set up the SQL Server properly? Any help would really be appreciated.Mits
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2007
I've noticed that after the database have been idle for some time, it takes up to 10 seconds to get it started when something needs to access it. In the event viewer it says that the database <name> have been started.
Obviously, there is some idle timeout setting.
I saw an option in the database properties that is called "Auto Close" which is set to true. I assume this is what i'm looking for. Can someone confirm that? (it could take some time to test myself...)
But what i'm actually wondering is:
1. Is it possible to adjust how long it would wait before timing out?
2. What advantages does closing the database bring? Does it free up (a noticeable amount of) ressources? Or is it only that it's unlocking the files, so that it's possible to copy the database source files?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2006
I have an Access2000 ADP that I want to run under Access2007. The problem I have is that some forms take up to 45 seconds to open in Access2007! These are not complicated forms--just simple navigable reference forms like setting up transaction types etc. that are based on basic select statements like:
SELECT * FROM ArReceivableType
Where ArReceivableType is a reference table (less than 10 columns, all int or nvarchar(100) max) containing about 15 or 20 rows. They open instantly in Access2000.
I put a trace on to see what is happening on the SQL Server, and I noticed heaps of nasty code like this that generates tens of thousands of reads:
select object_name(sotblfk.id), user_name(sotblfk.uid), object_name(sotblrk.id), user_name(sotblrk.uid) from sysreferences srfk, sysobjects sofk, sysobjects sotblfk, sysobjects sotblrk where srfk.constid = sofk.id and srfk.fkeyid = sotblfk.id and srfk.rkeyid = sotblrk.id and user_name(sofk.uid) = N'dbo' and object_name(sofk.id) = N'FK_FaAssetTransactionWork_ArReceivableType_ArReceivableTypeId'
It looks like Access2007 is reading all of the constraints for the underlying table, including all foreign keys. My SQL database contains 1400+ tables all with properly constructed foreign keys and other constraints.
Any suggestion on how to NOT have Access2007 do this? Right now, Access2000 works great for this enterprise app, but I really like the new Access2007 features (and I don't want to still be developing Access2000 apps in 2010).
View 3 Replies
View Related
