Here's my LINQ code:pl = (from p in db.Table where p.ID == 1 orderby p.NumericField descending select p).Take(7);
As you can see, I'm trying to sort by a numeric field. Specifically, it's a Numeric(5,0) field.
Problem is, the results aren't coming back numeric order. If this is good LINQ code, perhaps it's something else in my app. I just want to make sure this LINQ code is good.
Thanks in advance
I have a report where I am giving the users a parameter so that they can select which field they would like to sort on.The report is also grouping by that field. I have a gruping section, where i have added code to group on the field I want based on this parameter, however I also would like to changing the sorting order but I checked around and I did not find any info.
So here is my example. I am showing sales order info.The user can sort and group by SalesPerson or Customer. Right now, I have code on my dataset to sort by SalesPerson Code and Order No.So far the grouping workds, however the sorting does not.
Any suggestions would help.
Thanks
SSRS 2012 - VS2010...The report compares two years with a sort order on a value that has been engineered based on text switched to int. Â When sorting A-Z this is the result in the horizontal axis is: 5th, K, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th..When sorting Z-A the result in the horizontal axis is:5th, 4th, 3rd, 2nd, 1st, PreK..Z-A is correct but A-Z sorting shows 5th as the start and end. Â The magnitude of the PreK location is correct but the label is wrong on the A-Z sort order. Â The sorting is implemented using the Category Group sorting option.
View 6 Replies View Relatedwhen I run below query I got Error of Arithmetic overflow error converting numeric to data type numeric
declare @a numeric(16,4)
set @a=99362600999900.0000
The 99362600999900 value before numeric is 14 and variable that i declared is of 16 length. Then why this error is coming ? When I set Length 18 then error removed.
Guys
I'm getting the above when trying to populate a variable. The values in question are :
@N = 21
@SumXY = -1303765191530058.2251000000
@SumXSumY = -5338556963168643.7875000000
When I run, SELECT (@N * @SumXY) - (@SumXSumY * @SumXSumY) in QA I get the result OK which is -28500190448996439680147097583285.072256 ie 32 places to left of decimal and 6 to the right
When I try the following ie to populate a variable with that value I get the error -
SELECT R2Top = (@N * @SumXY) - (@SumXSumY * @SumXSumY)@R2Top is NUMERIC (38, 10)
Any ideas ??
Hi,
I have one column in which i have Alpha-numeric data like
COLUMN X
-----------------------
+91 (876) 098 6789
1-567-987-7655
.
.
.
.
so on.
I want to remove Non-numeric characters from above (space,'(',')',+,........)
i want to write something generic (suppose some function to which i pass the column)
thanks in advance,
Mandip
I need to replace Access Val() functions with similiar function in sql.
i.e. Return 123 from the statement: SELECT functionname(123mls)
Return 4.56 from the satement: SELECT functionname(4.56tonnes)
Any one with ideas please
Thanks
George
Hi,
I was trying to find numeric characters in a field of nvarchar. I looked this up in HELP.
Wildcard
Meaning
%
Any string of zero or more characters.
_
Any single character.
[ ]
Any single character within the specified range (for example, [a-f]) or set (for example, [abcdef]).
Any single character not within the specified range (for example, [^a - f]) or set (for example, [^abcdef]).
Nowhere in the examples below it in Help was it explicitly detailed that a user could do this.
In MS Access the # can be substituted for any numeric character such that I could do a WHERE clause:
WHERE
Gift_Date NOT LIKE "####*"
After looking at the above for the [ ] wildcard, it became clear that I could subsitute [0-9] for #:
WHERE
Gift_Date NOT LIKE '[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]%'
using single quotes and the % wildcard instead of Access' double quotes and * wildcard.
Just putting this out there for anybody else that is new to SQL, like me.
Regards,
Patrick Briggs,
Pasadena, CA
Hello!
I try to get a list of ConditionsVersion where Version is MAX for each ConditionsVersion.
I tried something like this (as seen on http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/vcsharp/aa336747.aspx#maxGrouped):
1 List<ConditionsVersion> list = (from cv in ConditionsVersions2 group cv by cv.FKConditions into cv3 select new { 4 PKConditions = cv.PKConditions,5 FKConditions = cv.FKConditions,6 MaxVersion = cv.GroupBy.Max(cv => cv.Version)7 CTimestamp = cv.Timestamp8 }).ToList();
But it doesn't work. It would be great if someone knows why.
Thank you!
Well, just played a little bit with that new thing from Microsoft. Genius! Microsoft presented that step backwards as a step forward.
Say good bye to the 3-tier architecture, now any programmer, after 1 week training, will be able to put SELECT * into the source code. No more stored procedures and logic on a server. No more ugly WHERE clauses. Just SELECT * and pass all records in a loop :)
When I looked at the queries, generated by LINQ in SQL profiler, I noticed that they are generated automatically using the same pattern. It is obvious, of course, but now it would be really difficult to trace a problematic query back to the C# code. All updates to table X will look like as identical twins!
On the other side, it is not so bad. We will have soon a lot of projects, failing when they go to the production and face the real volumes of data. And a long queue of companies, crying and asking to save them. Perfect “job security�. Please, use LINQ! Port all your code to LINQ immediately (Laughing demonically like Dr. Evil)
Hm… a second thought, but what could we suggest to these companies, having performance problems with LINQ 3rd party applications, when there is no source code? Now we could at least modify some stored procedures, and with LINQ looks like the only recommendation could be “contact a developer of that application or buy more a powerful server�.
Is it possible to use LINQ to SQL with Report Services? If so, are there any examples, tutorials, etc.?
View 1 Replies View Related Is Linq a feature of sql server 2008 ?
Or is it a feature of DOt net. Visual Studio 2008 ?
Some say linq to sql leads to the death of stored procedures is it correct ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWill Linq be compatible with Sql Server Everywhere without having to add additional plugins?
View 7 Replies View RelatedHullo am using Asp.Net 3.5, I want to create a usercontrol that is supported to all projects to upload file into sqlserver,
the user just give the database connection string,
tablename, column name depending upon their need, here I develop the
code using LINQ technology.
I Write a class with simple format like below,
using System;
using System.Data;
using System.Configuration;
using System.Linq;
using System.Web;
using System.Web.Security;
using System.Web.UI;
using System.Web.UI.HtmlControls;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls;
using System.Web.UI.WebControls.WebParts;
using System.Xml.Linq;
using System.Data.Linq;
/// <summary>
/// Summary description for FILE_MASTER_INSERT
/// </summary>
//namespace Linq2Sql_demo_doc
//{
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Table(Name = "FILE_MASTER")]
public partial class FILE_MASTER
{
string Tablename;
public FILE_MASTER()
{
//
// TODO: Add constructor logic here
//
}
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Column(Name="filename")]
public string FileName
{
get;
set;
}
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Column(Name = "file_content")]
public byte[] file_content
{
get;
set;
}
[System.Data.Linq.Mapping.Column(Name = "file_id", IsPrimaryKey = true, IsDbGenerated = true, CanBeNull = false)]
public int file_id
{
get;
set;
}
}
public class TestDB : DataContext
{
public Table<FILE_MASTER> FILE_MASTERs;
//Initializing base class constructor
public TestDB(string s) : base(s) { }
}
This
is working but, this is suitable only for single table, I expect
depending upon the user input automaticaly the tablename, column name
will change in the yellow block codes .
Is there any way to update the tablename , columnname from any other class?
Thank you. Jeyaseelan
I'm new to ASP/VS/Linq and I'm having a small problem.
I have one table setup in SQL Server Express 2005 through Visual Studio 2008. The table name is "Users" and has three columns (accountID, userName, email). AccountID is the primary key and set to auto incriment. I've added a couple of records by hand and it works.
I have a single form with a button, a label, and two text boxes. The button code is below. After entering some fake data that does not already exist in the database and clicking the button I get this.
Cannot insert explicit value for identity column in table 'Users' when IDENTITY_INSERT is set to OFF.
I understand that it is trying to insert something into the accountID field but I don't understand why since I'm only providing a username and e-mail address to insert.
Your help is greatly appreciated.protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
MyDatabaseDataContext db = new MyDatabaseDataContext();
var query = from u in db.Users
where u.email == txtEmail.Text
select u;
var count = query.Count();
if (count == 0)
{
//Create a new user object.
User newUser = new User();
newUser.username = txtUsername.Text;
newUser.email = txtEmail.Text;
//Add the user to the User table.
db.Users.InsertOnSubmit(newUser);
db.SubmitChanges();
}
else
{
Label1.Text = txtEmail.Text + " already exists in the database.";
}
I have a supplier table with all my suppliers in it. I list them in a gridview. In this gridview, there is a link next to each record to an edit page. Below is the code for the edit page. Protected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
Dim db As New orderLinqDataContext
Dim q = db.selectSupplierByID(Request.QueryString("id"))
Dim r As New System.Data.DataTable
txtFriend.Text = q(0).friendlyName
txtAdd1.Text = q(0).address1
txtAdd2.Text = q(0).address2
txtAdd3.Text = q(0).address3
txtAdd4.Text = q(0).address4
txtName.Text = q(0).supplierName
txtPhone.Text = q(0).phone
txtFax.Text = q(0).fax
txtPostCode.Text = q(0).postCode
End Sub
This causes a runtime error. The error is: "The query results cannot be enumerated more than once." and the txtAdd1.text line is highlighted.
How am I supposed to get at the data so I can fill my text boxes this way?
Thanks,
var query = from cloc in context.t_companylocs where (cloc.ref_company == companyid) && (cloc.street == attributes["Street"]) && (cloc.postalcode == attributes["Postalcode"]) && (cloc.country in countrylist) && (cloc.city in citylist) select cloc; attributes is a Dictionary<string, string> object.countrylist and citylist are List<string> objects.Of course the syntax above doesn't work. It's basically what I'm trying to achieve :-)A quick and dirty solution would be to just drop the two where constraints containing the "where in" statement and handle that part in the following foreach() loop.Can anyone please explain how you would do it properly?regards
View 1 Replies View RelatedDoes anyone have a good example of how to insert data using System.Data.Linq? All the examples I've seen do something likeNorthwindDataContext db = new NorthwindDataContext();var x = new Product() {...}; db.Products.Add(x);db.SubmitChanges(); However I'm not seeing an Add method on System.Data.Linq.Table<T>. Has this changed? Could I somehow not be generating my model correctly?
View 2 Replies View RelatedHello,
How can I get autogenerated value of inserted item with linq to sql?
Thanks
I would like to use LINQ to generate a sql statement that does not use LIKE, but rather uses CONTAINS. Is this possible? If not, my second question is whether or not I can parameterize a SqlCommand that uses CONTAINS. For example the following statement works just fine when I pass in the parameter via SqlCommand.Parameters.AddWithValue()SELECT * FROM [event] WHERE CONTAINS(comments, @searchTerm1)However, the following results in a variable not defined error.SELECT * FROM [event] WHERE (comments LIKE @searchTerm1)Any ideas? Thanks for your help.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi there,
In 2005.NET, if I used an asp:repeater, I would load the data from source and then manipulate it like so://load the data from source using a predefined connection and SQL Statement.private void LoadMyDataFromSource(){ try { connection.Open(); OleDbDataReader myReader = comm.ExecuteReader(); rptrCatList.DataSource = myReader; rptrCatList.DataBind(); myReader.Close(); } finally { connection.Close(); }} //catch the ItemDataBound event and manipulate the data how I wish before it's loaded into the Repeater.protected void rptrCatList_ItemDataBound(object sender, RepeaterItemEventArgs e) { if (e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.Item || e.Item.ItemType == ListItemType.AlternatingItem) { int title = 4; //this is the index of the column I wish to manipulate((Label)e.Item.FindControl("lblTitle")).Text = ((IDataRecord)e.Item.DataItem).GetString(title) + ":" } }This would give me all the flexbility I ever needed. But now I wish to use linq and since the IDataRecord relies on dataReader sources, I cannot obtain the same flexbility. Can anyone point me in the right direction for obtaining the same kind of flexbility but using a linq-to-SQL dataContext? I wish to manipulate mostData that comes through from my source, so: //loadng the data in via my linq-to-sql context.private void LoadProducts() { MyDataContext db = new MyDataContext (); var all = from p in db.Products_IncontinenceStandards where p.Product_Cat == "Category1" select p; rpterCat.DataSource = all; rpterCat.DataBind(); }This is where I get stuck because, even though I can still capture the ItemDataBound event since I have databound the Repeater to the linqSource, I can't access the individual fields (or this is what I think I can't do!), Does anyone know how to relate to this so I can create the same effect? Many Thanks,Nathan Channon
Hi,
I am beginner in SQL Server So excuse me if my question is stange for you.
I have to work on an sql server 2005. I need to extract data from this server in XML file. I have look at a lots of thing and I find two solutions:
- Use SSIS
- Create a home made solution with LINQ in c#
Clearly I do not have enouth experience to see with solution are the most available? Which are the things required to use those solutions?
Thanks
Hi Guys,
I started working with linq and vb9.0 but i have a small problem i could feagure how to solve in c# but not in vb
I wanted to make left join or right join on vb 9.0 and linq is it possible or this is only c# feature ?
Waiting to hear from u guys,
Thanks
Softy
Hello, How do I add multiple data using LINQ, this one doesn't work. ... Protected Sub Button1_Click(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button1.Click Dim i As Integer For i = 0 To 3 Dim db As personalDataContext = New personalDataContext Dim p As personal = New personal p.name = "John" p.number = "01213" p.picture = "image/image.jpg" db.personals.InsertOnSubmit(p) Next End Sub... cheers,imperialx
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm just starting to dabble around with LINQ and all of the examples I've come across all have 1 where clause. Is this intentional such that we are supposed to build queries on top of queries or is there a method in which I can add multiple predicates to my 1 query? I'm sorry if this sounds like a stupid question, I've been googling it to death and reading the few manuals on LINQ but like I said, all of the examples have had 1 where predicate.
Thanks,
Chance
hi, i'm working with LINQ to SQL and i have a table called Account, in that is Type, which is an int in the database but i map it to a AccountType enum, this works fine, but if i go into the dbml designer and change something later on, it gets errors, so i have to change all int->enum mappings back to int, recompile and then set them again! has anyone else had this? kindest regards
View 5 Replies View RelatedCan I know the best method to connect the sql server 2008 with Visual studio 2008, it will be helpful if I know how to access the stored procedures in the sqlserver via LINQ.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to convert the following sql to linq
SELECT R.UserID,R.Cntrl_nbr FROM User R
WHERE (
R.REG_ID=
(SELECT MAX(B.REG_ID)
FROM User B
WHERE R.UserID = B.UserID )
The linq I am using is
var query = (from n2 in q1
where
n2.RegServiceTs == (q1.Where(c1 => c1.UserID == n2.UserID).Max(c2 => c2.REG_ID))
select n2).SingleOrDefault();
This is slow and is there a better way to do this?
I'm trying convert my working CLR Trigger to a Linq-based implementation, but I don't seem to be able to get Linq to cooperate with the Trigger's context transaction (a local SubordinateTransaction with IsolationLevel="ReadCommitted").
For brevity's sake I've boiled down my scenario to a bare minimum: A SQL table [Test] with three columns (int Manual, int Automatic, IDENTITY int ID) needs any external updates on its [Manual] column to be applied to its [Automatic] column (with an additional sign change) through a Trigger.
A fairly direct translation of my non-Linq CLR Trigger to Linq yields the following code (the [Trigger_TestLinQs] SQL table has been modified to point to the Trigger's "INSERTED" table, [TestLinQs] points to the actual SQL table):
Code Snippet[SqlTrigger(Name = "LinQTrigger", Target = "dbo.TestLinQ", Event = "FOR INSERT, UPDATE")]
public static void LinQTrigger()
{
SqlTriggerContext triggerContext = SqlContext.TriggerContext;
if (triggerContext.TriggerAction == TriggerAction.Insert || triggerContext.TriggerAction == TriggerAction.Update) {
//using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(Transaction.Current)) { /* err 6549 */ using (SqlConnection connection = new SqlConnection("context connection=true")) {
connection.Open();
using (MyDataContext context = new MyDataContext(connection)) {
List<int[]> updates = new List<int[]>();
foreach (Trigger_TestLinQ test in (from t in context.Trigger_TestLinQs select t)) { /* err 6522 */
if (test.Manual != null && triggerContext.IsUpdatedColumn(0))
updates.Add(new int[] { test.ID, -test.Manual.Value });
}
foreach (int[] update in updates) {
dbo.TestLinQ test = (from t in context.TestLinQs where t.ID == update[0] select t).Single<dbo.TestLinQ>();
test.Automatic = update[1];
}
context.SubmitChanges();
}
}
// scope.Complete(); //}
}
}
Running this on SQL Server 2005 / .NET 3.5 beta2 produces an Error 6522 "Cannot enlist in the transaction because a local transaction is in progress on the connection." in the line executing the Linq query because the Linq DataContext apparently insists on opening a transaction.
The recommended pattern for DataContext query operations - running them inside a TransactionScope as indicated by the commented-out sections - unfortunately leads to a different Error 6549 in the TransactionScope constructor complaining about a missing MSDTC. And there shouldn't be a need for a distributed transaction here, should there?
Using different TransactionScope constructors (TransactionScopeOptions.Required, TransactionOptions(){IsolationLevel=ReadCommitted}) did not make any difference, either.
What am I doing wrong here? Is there any way for the Linq DataContext to attach to the CLR Trigger's ambient transaction?
We have an application that is built with WPF/.net 3.5 and leverages LINQ to SQL. Everything runs as expected when our application connects to MS SQL Server 2005. We have made a SQL CE version of our database using the Microsoft SYNC framework, and SQLMetal.exe to generate our .dbml.
The issue we are running into is that our application hangs while our LINQ to SQL objects are delay loading an EntitySet at random places throughout our code. After futher looking into the issue, and testing our published application on various workstations, we have discovered that the application does work on one computer that has SQL CE version 3.05.5365.0000. It does not however work on any computers that have SQL CE version 3.05.5386.0000.
We are logging the SQL queries that the LINQ to SQL is generating and when we execute them in the the Visual Studio 2008 Query Analyzer, they run successfully.
Any ideas are appreciated as we have hit a dead end.
Thanks!
I am getting a reference problem in APP_Code when I am creaing LinQ enabled website. When I am creating LinQ enabled website at that time it adds some dll like System.Query, System.Data.DLinq, System.Xml.XLinq and in web.config file it adds
<system.codedom> <compilers> <compiler language="c#;cs;csharp" extension=".cs" type="Microsoft.CSharp.CSharp3CodeProvider, CSharp3CodeDomProvider"/> </compilers> </system.codedom>
automatically. Now the problem is when I add references like System.Query it does not show the Query namespace (It does not show any of the external dll added in the bin folder). And if we comment the
<system.codedom> <compilers> <compiler language="c#;cs;csharp" extension=".cs" type="Microsoft.CSharp.CSharp3CodeProvider, CSharp3CodeDomProvider"/> </compilers> </system.codedom>
in web.config file it works properly that means it shows System.Query and other refrences.
Please if there is any solution do reply,
Thank You..
I have a GridView that is populated by a stored procedure via linq. I changed the stored procedure to return an additional column, but I can't get the additional column to show up in the GridView. The GridView has autogeneratecolumns=true, so if I were using a SqlDataSource the new column would show up automagically. But now it is not showing up and I cannot reference it. I can't figure out how to make linq recognize that my stored procedure has changed. I have tried deleting the sproc definition from the dbml file, making sure the partial class is removed the .vb file, refreshing the stored procedures list in database explorer, and adding the sproc definition back again (a hassle), but still it insists on defining only the original columns and not the new column. How do get linq to get back in sync with the database?
View 1 Replies View Related