I have a table which visibility can be toggled by a text box. By default it is invisible. After it is made visible, clicking a sortable column header makes the table invisible. Does this mean sorting makes the table go back to its default visibility?
Hi.
I found unpleasant issue within RS:
1. Imagine RS report with Table(with interactive sorting) whose visibility is toggled by Textbox:
2. After sorting the Table the Textbox is getting collapsed making the Table invisible. But the Table should remain visible.
Is this MS bug? Are there workarounds?
If my question is not understandable I can send simple *.rdl report with sample.
Thank you in advance for help.
Hi,
Can I create invisible table in SQL Server 2005?
Access(all versions) has this option if you add Usys_TableName.
The table will be invisible, but you can get data from it
Mark
HI
I have the following scenario in my report.
-The data is displayed in a table
-The table groups by one field
-Each table row calls a subreport
-There is about 6 paramaters in the report
-The last paramater of the list of paramters is a multivalue paramater and based on what is selected in the list the corresponding subreport must be shown.
-So i use a custom vbscript funtion to determine if a specific value was selected or not.
This functionality is working fine.
My problem is if the user does not select all the values in the multi select then i want to make the row invisble
and remove the whitespace so that there is not a gap between the other subreports which is shown.
I can make the subreport invisible inside the row but there is still the white space which does not display very nicly.
How can i make the row invisible if the vbscript function that is called returns a false value?
Here is the funtion I call -> Code.InArray("ValueToSearchFor", Parameters!MultiValueDropDown.Value)
The Function returns a true or false.
Thanks.
Until today, I was always under the impression that left vs. right was determined by which side of the comparison operator the table was located.
In other words:
LEFT JOIN LeftTable.ID = RightTable.ID
would pull all the records from LeftTable and those that matched from from RightTable and that:
RIGHT JOIN RightTable.ID = LeftTable.ID
would pull exactly the same result set but I was wrong. So, if it is not the table position in relation to the comparison operator, is it simply that the tables listed first in the FROM clause aren the ones "Left" of those subsequently entered?
Hello All & Thanks in advance for your help!Background:1) tblT_Documents is the primary parent transaction table that has 10fields and about 250,000 rows2) There are 9 child tables with each having 3 fields each, their ownPK; the FK back to the parent table; and the unique data for thattable. There is a one to many relation between the parent and each ofthe 9 child rows. Each child table has between 100,000 and 300,000rows.3) There are indexes on every field of the child tables (though Idon't believe that they are helping in this situation)4) The client needs to be presented a view that has 5 of the mainfields from the parent table, along with any and all correspondingdata from the child tables.5) The client will select this view by doing some pattern-matchingsearch on one of the child records' detail (e.g. field-name LIKE%search-item% - so much for the indexes...)Problem:When I do the simple join of just the parent with one of the children,the search works *fairly* well and returns the five parent fields andthe corresponding matching child field.However, as soon as I add any one of the other child records to simplydisplay it's unique data along with the previously obtained results,the resulting query hangs.Is the overall structure of the tables not conducive to this kind ofquery? Is this a situation where de-normalization will be required toobtain the desired results? Or, more hopefully, am I just an idiotand there is some simpler solution to this problem?!Thanks again for your assistance!- Ed
View 9 Replies View RelatedGreetings,
Facing a strange problem, but obviously not expected earlier on, I am trying to execute a stored procedure via ADO which refrences a linked server table and I get an error specifying
"
OLEDB provider SQLOLEDB does not contain table "<DatabaseName>"."<owner>"."<tableName>"
"
Has any one else encountered this problem before ?
regards
Govind
I have a report where I am giving the users a parameter so that they can select which field they would like to sort on.The report is also grouping by that field. I have a gruping section, where i have added code to group on the field I want based on this parameter, however I also would like to changing the sorting order but I checked around and I did not find any info.
So here is my example. I am showing sales order info.The user can sort and group by SalesPerson or Customer. Right now, I have code on my dataset to sort by SalesPerson Code and Order No.So far the grouping workds, however the sorting does not.
Any suggestions would help.
Thanks
SSRS 2012 - VS2010...The report compares two years with a sort order on a value that has been engineered based on text switched to int. When sorting A-Z this is the result in the horizontal axis is: 5th, K, 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th..When sorting Z-A the result in the horizontal axis is:5th, 4th, 3rd, 2nd, 1st, PreK..Z-A is correct but A-Z sorting shows 5th as the start and end. The magnitude of the PreK location is correct but the label is wrong on the A-Z sort order. The sorting is implemented using the Category Group sorting option.
View 6 Replies View RelatedHi friends,ID LASTNAME--------+----------------------------2FFF1XXX0CCC1DDD2BBB0EEE0GGG3III3HHH4ZZZ4ZZZplease help me in sorting this table. the table should be sorted basedon LASTNAME, and then the ID (only non-zero id should be sorted).ID LASTNAME--------+----------------------------2BBB2FFF0CCC1DDD1XXX0EEE0GGG3HHH3III4XYZ4ZZZshould be sorted based on last name and should be grouped with thesame ID, except for the ID as 0
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi Friends,How can we insert records in sorted orderlike consider a tableNo Name Phone1 test1123451 test1234552 test2686383 test3676844 test4548084 test474594if i add a new record like this2 test234454it should go in specific order. so that the final table should looksomething like thisNo Name Phone1 test1123451 test1234552 test2344542 test2686383 test3676844 test4548084 test474594
View 9 Replies View RelatedHi, I have a table whose Identifying column is not an integer but rather a manually entered id. (i.e. 106F, 106-09, G11 etc.) When sorted ascending, a G11 will come before a G2 in the list, 106-11 before 106-2, etc.I would like to insert a new column in the database or use some kind of function when sorting the database to ensure that the list in returned in the proper order. Any ideas?Much appreciated...
View 16 Replies View RelatedHello,
I am a little new at T-SQL. and I could use a suggestion on the best way to accomplish this task. I have an application where I must loop through a table in Microsoft SQL Server 2005, find the records that match and break them up into groups where the value of the Thickness field is in groups of ( <=8).
Lets say I have 100 records and the table contains sacks marked A, B, C, and D. Within Sack A is 6 records. Each of the 6 records has a thickness column with a value between 0.5 to 1.0 (my example shows 2) I have a column called bundle that I must update to show a 1 for the first group of (<=8) inches thick a 2 for the second group (<=8) inches thick and so on. Then repeat the process for sacks B, C and D.
The table itself has the following
Order Number |Zipcode |Sack(A, B, C,or D)| Thickness |Bundle|
1 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL |
2 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL
3 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL
4 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL
5 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL
6 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL |
7 |19721 |B | 4 |NULL |
8 |19721 |B | 3 |NULL |
9 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
10 |19721 |B | 5 |NULL |
11 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
12 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
What I need to do is sum the thickness until it gets to less than 8 and update bundle with a 1. The result would be 4 records and the table would then look like this:
Order Number |Zipcode | Sack(A, B, C,or D)| Thickness |Bundle|
1 |19809 |A | 2 |1 |
2 |19809 |A | 2 |1
3 |19809 |A | 2 |1
4 |19809 |A | 2 |1
5 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL
6 |19809 |A | 2 |NULL |
7 |19721 |B | 4 |NULL |
8 |19721 |B | 3 |NULL |
9 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
10 |19721 |B | 5 |NULL |
11 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
12 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
Notice there are two records that are not bundles for sack A. I need to place them in a separate bundle called 2. The result will be as follows
Order Number |Zipcode | Sack(A, B, C,or D)| Thickness |Bundle|
1 |19809 |A | 2 |1 |
2 |19809 |A | 2 |1
3 |19809 |A | 2 |1
4 |19809 |A | 2 |1
5 |19809 |A | 2 |2
6 |19809 |A | 2 |2 |
7 |19721 |B | 4 |NULL|
8 |19721 |B | 3 |NULL
9 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL
10 |19721 |B | 5 |NULL |
11 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
12 |19721 |B | 2 |NULL |
Now Sack A is complete so I must move on to Sack B. The first two records total to 7 and adding another record would move the thickness past 8 so I must update the bundle for only the first two records with a 1. The next two total to seven also and the following 2 total to four. We must set those bundles to 1, 2, 3 as follows
1 |19809 |A | 2 |1 |
2 |19809 |A | 2 |1
3 |19809 |A | 2 |1
4 |19809 |A | 2 |1
5 |19809 |A | 2 |2
6 |19809 |A | 2 |2 |
7 |19721 |B | 4 |1 |
8 |19721 |B | 3 |1 |
9 |19721 |B | 2 |2 |
10 |19721 |B | 5 |2 |
11 |19721 |B | 2 |3 |
12 |19721 |B | 2 |3|
These scenarios just keep repeating until the last record
Thank you for any help you can give me
I have a field (varchar) in a list that contains numbers and letters. I want to sort this table but I have only two functions that will work to convert the values:
Val
The Val function sorts the numbers in the string, but the letters are not sorted
CStr
The CStr function sorts the letters, but the numbers are not sorted
How can I sort the numbers and letters?
I am facing a problem of invisible data. I have developed a ASP based application in my local laguage and data is entered from 8 clients. Now I have found that in a particular table in the SQL Server very few data is not visible if I see from the SQL query analyzer. But if I go the application and try to enter the data again it gives a message that the data already exist and next time if i see it from query analyzer the data is displayed.
Please help.
Bidyut Rn. Gohain
Hey, everybody,
I need your help on figuring out what is this invisible character in one of my data column.
The file is from IBM DB2 as text. I am comparing the data with the one in SQL server. There is one white space at the end of the column I couldn't get rid off.
The text strings from both side look idential except the DB2 one has a "space" at the end.
The len() show it's 13, while the sql one is 12. However, the rtrim()/ltrim() did not get rid of it.
This column is at the end of the row. So it could be CR or LF.
To use padindex or stuff functions, I need to know what is this stuff.
Talking about working hard for "NOTHING".
Thanks!
I am not sure why when the packages are run, the components dissapear. The only thing I see is the result in the output.
So there is no visual on the tabs.
Thanks
Hi All,
I want to sort the column data which is of positive and negative number like the following.
-5823
-1
200
100
i want to sort like
-1
100
200
-5823
How can i do that can any one help me..
Thanks in advance.
-john
akanksha shukla writes "the issue is that i want to sort the records stored in a table according to aparticular column in such a manner that the sorted reaults are permanantly commited onto the same table i.e. the results are reflected on the same table whose records are being used for sorting
i know that order by clause can provide me a view of records sorted on basis of a particular column but the changes are not being reflected onto the table .
i donot want to create a fresh table to reflect the changes.
kindly suggest some help"
As I said above, how do I put sorting + paging in a stored procedure.My database has approximately 50000 records, and obviously I can't SELECT all of them and let GridView / DataView do the work, right? Or else it would use to much resources per one request.So I intend to use sorting + paging at the database level. It's going to be either hardcode SQL or stored procedures.If it's hardcode SQL, I can just change SQL statement each time the parameters (startRecord, maxRecords, sortColumns) change.But I don't know what to do in stored procedure to get the same result. I know how to implement paging in stored procedure (ROW_NUMBER) but I don't know how to change ORDER BY clause at runtime in the stored procedure.Thanks in advance.PS. In case "ask_Scotty", who replied in my previous post, http://forums.asp.net/thread/1696818.aspx, is reading this, please look at my reply on your answer in the last post. Thank you.
View 3 Replies View RelatedRecently found a situation which I can not figure out the cause. Wish somebody can help me here.
The scenario is as follows:
Server: SQL 7.0 with SP2
login name: DBA, standard SQL login, member of sysadmins
DB Name: TEST
DBA is the owner of database TEST and a member of db_owners in the database. Using EM, if you look at Users in TEST database, the only entry you can find is DBA where both Names (user name Login Name) are the same: DBA. There's no entry for user dbo. (from BOL, dbo can not be deleted)
Run sp_helpuser gives out two rows.
user login name
dbo NULL
DBA DBA
I don't know what happened to this machine before. Any clue about the possible cause is highly appreciated.
Hong
I am trying to locate the "My Reports" folder on the SSRS site, but I dont think I am able to see it. I am an admin on the box with Browser, Content Manager, My Reports roles.
I also tried creating the folder manually and it says the folder exists but I cant see it.
I have also checked on the "Site Settings" and checked the box "Enable My Reports". What else am I missing here?
Thanks,
sj
Is there anyway I could run an Audit trace on SQl Server which records SQL Server System Admin Login/Logout , failed login and machine names I don't want the trace window to show on screen however would like a file generated for later viewing. Also due to Firewall issues we have, We don't have SQL tools enabled to connect to that server.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhen defaulted to Visible or Invisible, +/- displays correctly. But when using the Expression, + is always showing as the default even when a group is expanded. Is this expected? TIA.
Publisher: SQL Server 2000 SP4
Subscriber: SQL Server 2005 Mobile Edition
Sometimes, after a failed merge replication(due to communication error) some rows on the subscriber became invisible for the publisher.
I've reproduced a case:
[START Short Version]
All rows inserted between a comm failed sync and a fine sync became invisible.
This seems to be caused because the subscriber keeps generating rows with the same generation number and the publisher doesn't look for this generation anymore.
[END Short Version]
[START Detailed case]
STEP 0: INITIAL STATE
Publisher
Orders Table
EMPTY
Subscriber
NO DATABASE
STEP 1: After FIRST SYNC and INSERTING 2 Orders
Publisher
Orders Table
EMPTY
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC000001 4 4 81000002 4 4 81
STEP 2: After SECOND SYNC
Publisher
Orders Table
OrderId
000001
000002
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
STEP 3: INSERT ANOTHER ORDER
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 6 81
STEP 4: After THIRD SYNC (with comm error)
Error: [NativeError:28037][HRESULT:-2147012889]->[A request to send data to the computer running IIS has failed. For more information, see HRESULT.]
When: Error happens provoked after sending from Subscriber to Publisher but before ending syn process.
Publisher
Orders Table
OrderId
000001
000002
000003
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 6 81
Note: Publisher has the row but subscriber keeps the state in 81.
STEP 5: INSERT ANOTHER ORDER (BEFORE A GOOD SYNC)
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 6 81
000004 6 6 81
Note: Orders 000003 and 000004 have the same system info
STEP 6: After FOURTH SYNC
Publisher
Orders Table
OrderId
000001
000002
000003
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 6 81
000004 6 6 81
Note: Even with a fine merge process Publisher didn't get the 000004 row and the Subscriber didn't update the __sysMC
STEP 7: INSERT ANOTHER ORDER
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 6 81
000004 6 6 81
000005 8 8 81
STEP 8: After FIFTH SYNC
Publisher
Orders Table
OrderId
000001
000002
000003
000005
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 6 81
000004 6 6 81
000002 8 8 80
Note: Data from generation 8 merge correctly, but data from generation 6 keeps invisible to publisher.
STEP 9: DUMMY UPDATE ON GEN 6 ROWS
Action: I made a non relevant update to force the Subscriber update the generation.
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 10 81
000004 6 10 81
000005 8 8 80
Note: sysCG get its value updated correctly.
STEP 10: After SIXTH SYNC
Publisher
Orders Table
OrderId
000001
000002
000003
000004
000005
Subscriber
Orders Table
OrderId __sysIG __sysCG __sysMC
000001 4 4 80
000002 4 4 80
000003 6 6 80
000004 6 6 80
000002 8 8 80
Note: Data merges correctly.
[END Detailed case]
I could code a system that checks all the publication tables and updates all the last generation rows in case of communication error but i would really like to avoid doing it.
I don't know if I'm missing something or if this is a bug or a known issue.
This is a big problem for me because communication errors on cellular phone based connection are quite common and users keep working even if there's an error.
Any comment will be appreciated.
Hi, I have 3 report parameters.
If a user selects 'value1' from the first parameter list then parameter list 2 & 3 should be open for the user to make their selection. BUT if the user selects 'value2' from parameter 1 then only parameter list 2 should be open and parameter list 3 invisible. Is this possible??
Hi,
Do you know why when I run my ssis packages in the dev machine, the diagrams are not visible during run time.
I can design the package but not sure why when I start the package, the diagrams in the control flow can not be viewed.
Please note that if I do this on the server, I can see the diagrams during run time.
Thanks
I am trying to sort my sql resultset by an alphanumeric column of a table which is of NVARCHAR datatype. The sample data is given below:
CREATE TABLE #Activities(activityName NVARCHAR(100))
INSERT INTO #Activities VALUES('Field phase S14-04932-01')
INSERT INTO #Activities VALUES('Phase reporting')
INSERT INTO #Activities VALUES('Phase running')
INSERT INTO #Activities VALUES('RD1')
[Code] ....
The output of the query is like this:
A1
A2
A3
A4
E1 0DAA1
E10
E2 0DAA2
[Code] .....
The output what I require is this:
A1
A2
A3
A4
E1 0DAA1
E2 0DAA2
[Code] ....
I am joining on table A AND Table B ON the accountnumber field. The accountnumber on the tblB has some invisble characters at the end, ie "12344 ". The Table A does not have these invisble chars and is "12344".
Due to the extra spaces at the end, the join fails and does not find a match for that acctno. I have used ltrim(rtrim) hoping that will elimante the extra spaces and find a match.
Heres my qry:
select * from Tbla a
inner join tblb B
on ltrim(rtrim(ACCTNO))=ltrim(rtrim(ACCT))
How do I do this, so that it finds a match and returns the acctno.
I want to get different sums from an item base. I have taken the number of every order (ord) from an order base and goes to the item-base like this:
Set Rss = Server.CreateObject("ADODB.RecordSet")
sSQL= "SELECT array(sum(numitems)) from oitems where orderid= " & ord
Rss.Open sSQL, sDSN, adOpenStatic, adLockReadOnly, adCmdText
I have not tried to run the sql- the array is just a dummy to show the idea.
Actually I want to make an array of the sum of items with the same numitems (i.e. the same productnumber)
if the sql runs I will write the array like this:
While Not rss.eof
response.write array(sum(numitems))
'or whatever way I have to write it
rss.Movenext
Wend
...anyone who has a good idea of how to do this?
I have been tring to get this one line figured out for a few days now.
'Job2 Info
Dim selectSQL2 As StringselectSQL2 = "SELECT * FROM '" & CompanyKey & "'" '<<-------HERE
Dim cmd2 As New SqlCommand(selectSQL2, con)
'Job2 Select
Try
con.Open()
reader = cmd2.ExecuteReader()
(I have the full code below.) So here is the problem, this code is not populating the datagrid. There is data in the table I am selecting from. When I log in, my CompanyKey value displays in the label as "21". When I take out the "CompanyKey" variable, and just type in 21, the grid is populated. It is confusing the heck out of me. I have tried it this way:
selectSQL2 = "SELECT * FROM [" & CompanyKey & "]"
-and this way:
selectSQL2 = "SELECT * FROM & CompanyKey
and all the other ways I could think of. I researched it and can just not get it to work any way I do it. Any suggestions? Full code below:
____________________________________
Imports System.DataImports System.Data.CommonImports System.Data.SqlClient
Partial Class _Default
Inherits System.Web.UI.PageProtected Sub Page_Load(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Me.Load
'Database ConnectionDim con As New SqlConnection("Data Source = .SQLExpress;integrated security=true;attachdbfilename=|DataDirectory|ASPNETDB.mdf;user instance=true")
'Job1(Info)Dim currentUserID
currentUserID = Context.User.Identity.Name.ToString()
Label1.Text = currentUserID
Dim selectSQL1 As StringselectSQL1 = "SELECT companyKey FROM Company WHERE UserID = ('" + currentUserID + "')"
Dim cmd1 As New SqlCommand(selectSQL1, con) Dim reader As SqlDataReader
Dim CompanyKey
'Job1 Select
Try
con.Open()
reader = cmd1.ExecuteReader()Do While reader.Read()
CompanyKey = reader("CompanyKey").ToString()
Loop
reader.Close()Catch err As Exception
ReaderError.Text = "Error selecting record."
ReaderError.Text &= err.Message
Finally
con.Close()
End Try
'Job2 Info
Dim selectSQL2 As StringselectSQL2 = "SELECT * FROM [" & CompanyKey & "]"
Dim cmd2 As New SqlCommand(selectSQL2, con)
'Job2 Select
Try
con.Open()
reader = cmd2.ExecuteReader()
GridView1.DataSource = reader
GridView1.DataBind()
reader.Close()Catch err As Exception
ReaderError.Text = "Error selecting record."
ReaderError.Text &= err.Message
Finally
ReaderResults.Text = CompanyKey
con.Close()End TryEnd Sub
End Class
I have a couple reports that have parameters on them. Problem is when the report is printed, the parameters are not displayed.
To solve this, I have added the selected values to the header section of the report in a text box. I now want to find away to hide these values when the report is being viewed on screen but visible when printed. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks
The DB Enginee is SQL2005 SP1. In MSSMS
the following query always finishes within 1 minute
SELECT *
FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 ON t1.key= t2.key
where t1.StartTime >= '3/19/2008' AND t1.EndTime <= '3/20/2008'
AND t2.StartTime >= t1.StartTime AND t2.StartTime < t1.EndTime
however, the following always takes 10+ minutes
declare @pStartDate datetime
declare @pEndDate datetime
set @pStartDate='3/19/2008'
set @pEndDate='3/20/2008'
SELECT *
FROM t1 INNER JOIN t2 ON t1.key= t2.key
where t1.StartTime >= @pStartDate AND t1.EndTime <= @pEndDate
AND t2.StartTime >= t1.StartTime AND t2.StartTime < t1.EndTime
Both return same result. The only diff. is the blue part. Why the second one performances so badly?
Thanks.