Hi,
I was wondering, is it really true that in Sql Server 2005, there is no updated date -property for stored procedures? There is a created date -property, but it's not useful, because stored procedure's get updated often. This is a huge disadvantage for me, and I was really waiting for ms to fix this problem after sql server 2000, but no. Does anyone figured out any solution to this problem?
Br,
Riika
Hi everyone
I have just starting creating some stored procedures for our system and have a question related to management of these.
When using input parameters using the following syntax:
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_someInputProcedure
@Username as varchar(16)
@Password as varchar(12)
@Name as varchar(50)
@Address as varchar(60)
@Zip as int
@City as varchar(30)
...
etc.
This is all well and good, but what if I make a change in the datamodel - for instance changing a datatype or the length of a varchar - do I need to remember to manually update all stored procedures that uses these columns/variables?
Seems like a bit of a hazzle. Is there an easier way to do this?
Many thanks,
Stian Danielsen
Epizone
Is there such a date/time?I see the Created date on the list of stored procs, but really want aDate Last Updated. After changing code for 3 hours, I tend to forgetwhich procs I've worked on, and which need to be move to production.any simple way to keep track of the last procs played with?thanks in advance...Join Bytes!
View 8 Replies View Related I'm having some problems debugging SQL Server stored procedures on a SQL Server 2005 server. I have installed Visual Studio 2005 on a workstation running Windows XP, now I'm trying to debug a ASP.Net web application that has some code that executes the stored procedures on a Windows 2003 Server running SQL Server 2005.
I opened VS2005 ... created a connection to the SQL Server 2005 instance ... open the Stored procedure ... right click the stored procedure name and selected Step into Stored Procedure and the following message is displayed:
Unable to start T-SQL debugging.Could not attach to SQL Server process on 'ServerName'.
Any ideas.
Thanks,
Hai,
I just waana know whether we can use "FOR statement" in Stored Procedures. If yes, can you describe it with some examples of how they are used in stored procedures ?
Hi,I want to save the last modification date when the row is updated. I have a column called "LastModification" in the table, every time the row is update I want to set the value of this column to the current date. So far all I know is that I need to use a trigger and the GetDate() function, but could any body help me with how to set the value of the column to getdate()? thanks for your help.
View 3 Replies View RelatedBackground: We have SQL Server 2005 x64 running on a quad-core (dual dual-core) machine with 16GB of RAM. The database is about 10GB in size and we execute around a million stored procedures a day on it. Our application uses about 1000 different stored procedures on this machine. The application is a transactional B2B web-app with about 2000 users.
The problem we have is a really odd one that I can't seem to find much information on. We have a small number (3-4) of stored procedures that's exibiting this problem.
The stored proc in question takes on average 100ms CPU time to execute. It's a fairly complex stored proc, about 300 lines long, 6-7 select statements and it uses temp tables. No updates / inserts except for on the temp tables. It's executed about 5000 times per day. About once a week, though, execution times will suddenly jump up to 3000 ms average. This happens randomly during the day, although it seems to happen more often on Monday mornings (the DB is mostly unutilized over the weekend)
To fix this, I force the DB to recalculate the execution plan by adding / removing (depending what I did last time around) the line 'set arithabort on' at the top of the stored procedure. I have no idea why this works, but it does. Within seconds of changing it, the stored proc execution time will go back to it's normal range of 60-150ms.
I've tried setting the execution plan of the stored procedure but I can't get it to work - the execution plan is very long and I don't know how to debug the error I get.
What is happening? This happens with a couple of stored procedures - usually the more complex ones. Has anyone seen anything like this?
Hi,In SQL 2000 if I wanted to take a complete copy of another running sqldatabase all did was create a new database locally and right-click itand select import and point to another database and click copyeverything (stored procedures as well) and it did it for. I can't seemto find the same functionality in SQL 2005. You can copy tables andviews but not the whole database. Is there another way of doing this?Our SQL database is hosted externaly and they recommend using theimport/export feature to do it. Does anyone know I can copy everything(such stored procedures, data table relations...etc)TanksMA.
View 1 Replies View Related1). When you right click stored procedure in the Query Analyzer on 2000 you can select debug from the list of menues.
I can't find this functionality in the SQL Server Management studio.
2). By the way I also can't find where went the output of my print statement.
3). Does server cursor functionality is still working in 2k5?
Hi,
I am using SQL server 2005 stored procedures being called from my java application using the CallableStatement. As long as my stored procedure is a simple and direct Select statement things are moving nicely.
But my stored procedures are a little bit more complicated and this causes problems for me to parse the data in a ResultSet.
a sample stored procedure:
Create procedure sp_Get
@cat int,
@itemId bigint
as
declare @results table (tableId bigint, label varchar(200), typeId int)
if @cat = 1
begin
insert @results (tableId, label, typeId)
select
tableId = personId,
label = fname + lname,
typeId = 1
from Person where catId = @itemId
insert @results (tableId, label, typeId)
select
tableId = prospectId,
label = prospect,
typeId = 2
from Prospects where catId = @itemId
end
else if @cat = 2
begin
insert @results (tableId, label, typeId)
select
tableId = companyId,
label = Company,
typeId = 1
from Company where regionId = @itemId
end
/* result set*/
select
tableId,
label,
typeId
from @results
GO
my java code:
Connection conn = this.getConnection() //opens connection to db
CallableStatement cmd = conn.prepareCall(" { call sp_Get (?,?) }");
cmd.setInteger("cat", 1);
cmd.setLong("itemId", 2);
//this returns false?
boolean hasResults = cmd.execute();
//this also returns false?
boolean moreResults = cmd.getMoreResults();
The strange part of this is that when you execute this query in the SQL Server Managent Studio it returns 1 result set.
Why is my java code not able to see this result?
Thanks for any help,
- Rogier
Hello,
What permissions do I need to set on our new SQL Server 2005 test server so that I can see the stored procedures, views and tables from Visual Studio development environment.
Example, I can see my older SQL Server 7 tables, edit them, write stored procedures, and so on. But while I can see the SQL Server 2005 and its databases, the folder underneath are empty and I cannot right-click to create New stored procedure or table.
My guess is that there is security involved, if so, what do I set on the new server?
If I'm wrong, and it's something else entirely, please advise.
Thanks!
I'm a new developer to both SQL Server 2005 & Windows 2003, so forgive me if this question seems a little too basic. I'm coming from a Oracle and UNIX background.
I've create a stored procedure in SQL Server 2005. I now want to execute this from the command line in Windows 2003. Eventually, I want our UNIX scheduler, autosys (which runs on a different UNIX machine obviously) to be able to execute this. In my old environment, I created a UNIX shell script as a wrapper let's say 123.sh. This shell script would accept as a parameter the name of the stored procedure I wanted to execute. If this stored procedure also had parameters it needed to be passed to it, I would have strung these values out in the command line in UNIX. Two examples of how the command line in UNIX I used to execute the Oracle stored procedure might look are listed below.
123.sh sp_my_stored_procedure input_parm1 input_parm2
123.sh sp_different_stored_procedure input_parm1
This way anytime I created a new stored procedure, I could reuse the shell script wrapper 123.sh and just pass in the name of the newly created stored procedure and any parameters it needed.
How can I accomplish this same type of functionality in the SQL Server 2005/Windows 2003 environment.
Thanks, Jim
Hi,
I would like to use a stroed procedure within another stored procedure ( nested sp )
in a SQL project in VS.NET 2005. Since I have to use "context connection = true" as
connection string, I wont be able to use this connection for another sqlconnection
object. Because its already open. and If i try to use a regular connection string
("server=localhost;...") it will raise a security permission error. Having this
problem, Im not able to use nested stored procedures. Would anyone please give me a
hint how to resolve this issue?
Stupid question but please be gentle and answer anyway please....
Background: We have SQL Server 2003 (32bit) running on our servers. Our .Net applications (from old release of VS) are still running on them and using the old databases. From what I understand there is no immediate plans to upgrade the servers. However the developers were just given this new upgrade (2005) SQL Server and VS (and fixing depreciated code etc in the .net apps).
Question: Can the applications and new stored procedures written via the 2005 environment be deployed successfully on the 2003 Servers? Same goes with Reporting Services?
This question is about SQL Server 2005:
I have been trying to figure out how to copy tables and stored procedures between 2 databases (on the same server) using SQL Server Management Studio. I have tried right clicking on the table name, "script table as", "drop to", "clipboard", then I click on the 2nd database, and then click on the "tables" . I change the name of the database and click "execute". This creates the table but does not copy the data. I have also tried "create to" "clipboard" and "insert to" "clipboard" and cannot seem to be able to figure out how to get the results that I want. I am new at this but need to get the tables with the data copied along with the stored procedures, even if I have to do them one at a time. When I was using SQL Server 2000, I was able to use DTS to copy objects to other databases easily. Can someone please tell me a way to accomplish what I need to do? I have gotten information here before that was very useful and was hoping that someone can help me again.Thank you so much. Carol Quinn
Hi,
This Might be a really simple thing, however we have just installed SQL server 2005 on a new server, and are having difficulties with the set up of the Store Procedures. Every time we try to modify an existing stored procedure it attempts to save it as an SQL file, unlike in 2000 where it saved it as part of the database itself.
Thank you in advance for any help on this matter
I have successfully moved my data from a SQL Server 2000 hosting site to a SQL Server 2005 hosting site. I Made a backup of my database using Enterprise Manager (2000) and imported the database tables using SQL Server Management Studio (2005). I do not know how to move the 25 or so stored procedures that I have in SQL Server 2000. I have a very short amount of time to figure this out and am hoping that someone can give me a brief step by step answer on how to get this done. I would appreciate any information you can provide. Thank you!!
View 5 Replies View Related
Hello,
I have a database (SQL 2005) with two schemas (dbo and s1) and with tables defined in dbo and tables defined in s1. The stored procedures are also defined in both schemas, some of them in dbo some of them in s1. Some of the stored procedures query tables from dbo and s1 at the same time.
I want to have a new db role with access to the database only through sps and no other access read/write to the tables. I created a new db role and granted execute permission to it and assigned a user to it.
When I execute stored procedure defined in dbo with query against dbo tables, it works as expected.
However, if I run stored procedure defined in s1 with query to table in dbo, I receive error about missing select permission for the table in dbo. I am not sure why, but I can assume there is an issue with the ownership chain.
I can grand read/write permission for the tables, but this will break our original requirement for limited access to the db only through sp.
The other option is to have another role r2, with read/write, privilege and to use EXECUTE AS r2 in the sp.
I would like to ask first why the error for missing select permission happens and is there another way to have role restricted to only execute permission for all stored procedures.
Thanks,
IT
Hi all,
I am using Visual web developper 2005 with sql server express 2005 and i have also sql server management studio express. it's all free now .
my web site is ready
I didn't have problem to upload my site to my hoster.
Now I want to upload all my tables and my stored procedure create locally with VWD express
How can i do it ?
NB: I know i can't design DB (create/modify tables and stored proc) with express edition
thank's for your help
I want to know the differences between SQL Server 2000 storedprocedures and oracle stored procedures? Do they have differentsyntax? The concept should be the same that the stored proceduresexecute in the database server with better performance?Please advise good references for Oracle stored procedures also.thanks!!
View 11 Replies View RelatedI need to set date parameters within Stored Procedures using a sql 2008 R2, with an access 2007 front end. The procedure needs to allow me to set parameters for a start date and an end date.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn SQL Server is there a way to know when a procedure was lastmodified? I only see the "Create Date" column on the EnterpriseManager.Thanks Experts!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi
I have many existing tables within my db with the date format mm/dd/yyyy
Is it possible to run a stored procedure in order to convert the EXISTING records to the date format dd/mm/yyyy?
Thanks
currently i m developing a web application with using sql server 2005
and i was testing yesterday a sql update query with sql server management studio.
in my update query i forgot to put where condition and now all the rows of table are updated. is there any solution to undo this and retrieve all rows back?
Regards Selena
I am looking to created a trigger that inserts records into a log table to show the stored porcedure that has updated a specific column to a specific value in a specific table
At present I have:
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[trUpdaterTable]
ON [dbo].[t_account]-- A DB level trigger
FOR UPDATE
--Event we want to capture
AS
IF update (document_status)
[Code] ...
However this doesn't appear to bring back the procedure that triggered the update...
The value the trigger should update on is document_status = 0
DDLProcExecutedByEventDate
NULLNULLLOMBDAadministrator2015-06-25 07:42:01.677
NULLNULLLOMBDA im64602015-06-25 07:51:34.503
NULLNULLLOMBDAadministrator2015-06-25 07:52:01.610
NULLNULLLOMBDAadministrator2015-06-25 08:02:01.417
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[trTableupdateaccount] ON [DoesMore].[dbo].[t_account]
[Code] ....
Hi!
I use sql 2005 express on my computer for testing. The server that hosts my site is a sql 2000 server. Therefore I tuned the one database I use down to sql 8.
When I create stored procedures from web developer express, to the local sql 8 database I have in my sql express, it works nice. But when I copy all my files and my stored procedure to the webhost, it doesn't work.
Do you guys have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance.
Is it possible to create and use stored procedures in SQL 2005 Express? As noted by someone else in an earlier post, you can right-click the stored procedures folder, get a template, code a stored procedure, and save it to a project file. However, whereas the earlier thread suggested that one could save the sp to the database by clicking !Execute, this does not work for me and I can find no other obvious way to make the sp accessible to my code-behind procs. Any suggestions will be greatly appreciated!
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi 2 all,
How to create stored procedures using a Wizard in sqlserver 2005 (Like from "Run a Wizard" in sqlserver 2000)
Please Helpme.
Thanx in advance.
The Extended Stored Procedures (Written in C++ unmanaged code) are supported in SQL Server 2005????
Thanks
I have a DataSet (Data Component in Beta 1) and I want to add Fill and
Get methods by using a Stored Procedure that was created by VS 2005 (aspnet_Membership_GetAllUsers). I probably need to use Enterprise Manager to do so but I am not sure what permissions I need to set and how to set them.
Hi gurus
i have a assignment on hands to transfer store procedures of 2005 to 2000. I have tryed by scripting SPs and then runing them in 2000 QA, but it gives me error every time ....... so please help me to resolve this problem.
thanks
shekhar
Dear All,
I am using SQL 2005 Express, and i need to Encrypt all my Stored Procedure while deploying in my Production Server.
Help me out to do.
I converted a program from SQL 2000 to SQL 2005 all went well. I created a number of tables and stored procedures after the conversion. I backed up my .mdf and .idf files. I was having problems with SQL so I uninstalled and re-installed it. Once I re-installed it I could no longer display some tables and files. Since I am the dbo, I think I should be able to access them. There obviously is something I am missing, hopefully not the tables and sps.
I would appreciate any suggestions.
Thank you.
LitePipe