SqlCe 3.0: Not Enough Storage Is Available To Complete This Operation.
Mar 8, 2007
I'm getting the "out of memory" exception when trying to do various things on a sql mobile [sql mobile 2005] database on a windows mobile 5 device. Our app uses compact framework 2.0 and is written in c#.
Our application uses strongly typed data sets, and save/loads them from a sql mobile database. The error occurs in different places, but always somewhere we interact with the database. It might fail on "DELETE FROM Location" in one run, and on a DataAdapter.Update on another, and a DataAdapter.Fill in another.
The memory thing I can add to the today screen suggests that when I encounter this error there is only 1-2Mb of program memory free [and about 13Mb of storage]. Unfortunately windows mobile 5 doesn't seem to have a way to adjust the allocation between storage/program memory anymore.
The failure has been occuring while trying to import data [which we are loading from a web service, as weakly typed datasets and copying into our specialized ones].
I have implemented:
Using statements, and/or dispose statements on:
Data Adapters
explicitly calling the dispose method on commands used in data adapters: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/824462
Sql Connections
Sql commands [where not used in adapters]
Using/dispose around the larger data sets in the loading process
Gc.Collect() before database interaction [this seemed kind of like a last resort]
Reduction of memory usage [by loading fewer records from the web service at a time]
There does not seem to be a storage memory limitation, a fully loaded database file is about 3Mb. Our test handheld has only 64Mb of memory, and I've seen at most maybe 25Mb free [storage and program combined].
We are opening [and closing] a connection each time we touch the database. How much of a difference will going to a single connection opened when the app starts make?
I am having trouble trying to import a big file (aprox 250Mb is size) into an SQL Server database and I keep getting the message:
"Not enough storage is available to complete this operation".
The application tries to import the file by executing a stored procedure:
CREATE PROCEDURE sp_updateMaterialBlob @MaterialId Int, @BLOB image AS BEGIN Update Material SET blob = @blob where id = @materialId END
The application uses an ADO connection. I've tried increasing the memory of the client machine but that didn't work. Whenever I do run the import, nearly all the memory on the machine is used up but every time after several hours I get the same error message. What is the cause of the problem and how do I resolve it? Ideally I want to use my application to do the import rather than anything bespoke.
I get this exception after awhile of browsing thru my application, i dunno what causes this because it never happens in the same place. I would like to know if anyone else is experiencing this situation and if there is a solution.
SqlCeException Not enough storage is available to complete this operation.
em System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.ProcessResults() em System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.Open() em System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.Open() em System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.QuietOpen() em System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.FillInternal() em System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill() em System.Data.Common.DbDataAdapter.Fill()
Hello I recently bought a Palm Centro from Sprint and I wanted to install the cd that came with it. On this cd is Palm desktop and Sprint music manager which I need to use my phone. The problem is when I insert the disk. After my laptop reads it it displays the error message along with: Line:134 Char:2 Code:0 and finally URL: file://E:EnglishEssential_Software esources.html. I have no idea what to do or why this is happening can you please explain????? Maybe offer some steps also thank you
Hi all,I'm getting this error when trying to import data from a text file intoSQL Server 2000 (Windows Server 2003) using the DTS import wizard.Any ideas what could be causing this? There aren't any restrictions(that i can find) on the file sizes etc.Thanks in advance.Dave
I have created a small COM in C# so that I can programatically create and execute stored procedures with SMO. At this point the COM has nothing in it but just a test prototype. But when I tried to create the object as follows, I get the error indicated below. It is not a memory issue because I have adequate storage and RAM.
Please Help!
DECLARE @object int DECLARE @hr int DECLARE @property varchar(255) DECLARE @return varchar(255) DECLARE @src varchar(255), @desc varchar(255)
-- Create an object. EXEC @hr = sp_OACreate 'SQLInterop.CsharpHelper', @object OUT IF @hr <> 0 BEGIN EXEC sp_OAGetErrorInfo @object, @src OUT, @desc OUT SELECT hr=convert(varbinary(4),@hr), Source=@src, Description=@desc RETURN END
This is the error I am getting:
Error Code: 0x8007000E Description: Not enough storage is available to complete this operation. Source: ODSOLE Extended Procedure
This is the C# code for the COM:
using System; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; using System.Reflection; using System.Runtime.CompilerServices; using System.EnterpriseServices;
// General Information about an assembly is controlled through the following // set of attributes. Change these attribute values to modify the information // associated with an assembly. [assembly: AssemblyTitle("CSServer")] [assembly: AssemblyDescription("Test SQL .NET interop")] [assembly: AssemblyDelaySign(false)] [assembly: AssemblyKeyFile("MyKey.snk")]
// Setting ComVisible to false makes the types in this assembly not visible // to COM components. If you need to access a type in this assembly from // COM, set the ComVisible attribute to true on that type. [assembly: ComVisible(true)]
// The following GUID is for the ID of the typelib if this project is exposed to COM [assembly: Guid("ff35c6b4-81bf-47dd-9290-fcbbb49008d9")]
// Version information for an assembly consists of the following four values: // // Major Version // Minor Version // Build Number // Revision // // You can specify all the values or you can default the Revision and Build Numbers // by using the '*' as shown below: [assembly: AssemblyVersion("1.0.0.1")] [assembly: AssemblyFileVersion("1.0.0.1")]
// the ApplicationName attribute specifies the name of the // COM+ Application which will hold assembly components [assembly: ApplicationName("SQLInterop")]
// the ApplicationActivation.ActivationOption attribute specifies // where assembly components are loaded on activation // Library : components run in the creator's process // Server : components run in a system process, dllhost.exe [assembly: ApplicationActivation(ActivationOption.Server)] namespace SQLInterop { public interface ITest { string SayHello(); string SayIt(String strMessage); }
//[SecurityRole("RBSecurityDemoRole", SetEveryoneAccess = true)] [ComVisible(true)] [CLSCompliant(false)] [ClassInterface(ClassInterfaceType.None)] public class CSharpHelper : ITest { public string SayHello() { return "Hello from CSharp"; }
public string SayIt(String strMessage) { return strMessage + ": from CSharp"; } } }
I have built an application for storing my flight times on my phone after each leg of a trip... I am using C# and Sql CE as the storage system for later export to a larger desktop version (in the works). My question is related to storing the sdf file on the storage card. Can it be done and what would the connection string look like since I have tried and got a error stating it can't find the sdf file in question. I have it setup right where if I were to do a fresh install it would ask for the install directory main memory or storage card. If I select storage card it installs just fine but when I run the app it does fail with the aforementioned error..
Frequently, when I'm connecting to my server through SSMS i get "Is Busy: Microsoft SQL Server is waiting to complete an internal operation...."
And it tells me that if I get that message a lot, I should let Microsoft know.
So -- Microsoft, I'm letting you know.
Can anyone tell me why this is happening? I've searched MSDN and the knowledge base...I can only find one reference, and that is to a database diagram issue.
It takes a while to connect when this happens. So far, I haven't found a common denominator. It happens if I'm logged into my server and I try to connect to another instance, and it happens when I'm using my desktop...
I am new to Forum. So not sure if i am posting my problem uner the right topic.
We have a sql server 2005 enterprise edition 4 way cluster on windows 2003 advance server.
I am logshipping these database to a different server at a different location. My logshipping went fine until one the cluster server failed and the server instance failed over to another node. The backup that happened around that time got copied over to the secondary by the copy job. The log file that got copied to the secondary server tried restoring and i think it failed int he middle of restoring it. (You would think that the sql would knoe if the backup is in complete and will move on to the next file. Not sure what happened there.) There is no indication of the *.TUF file in the directory where i have the log files.
I tried restoring it manually and i got the following error
Msg 4319, Level 16, State 3, Line 1
A previous restore operation was interrupted and did not complete processing on file 'sessionlog1'. Either restore the backup set that was interrupted or restart the restore sequence.
Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally.
I looked in the msdb..log_shipping_secondary_databases and looked for the last file that it restored and tried restoring it again with the following restore command by removing and adding some of the keywords that you see after the "WITH" clause. MSFT do not recommand to use continne_after_error unless its absolutley necessary. I stilll get the above error.
restore log sessiondata
from disk = 'I:sql13qasmlogssessiondatasessiondata_20070901124516.trn'
with restart, CONTINUE_AFTER_ERROR, norecovery
When i add the restart int he with clause,
The restart-checkpoint file 'J:Microsoft SQL ServerMSSQL.5MSSQLBackupsessiondata.CKP' was not found. The RESTORE command will continue from the beginning as if RESTART had not been specified.
Msg 4319, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
A previous restore operation was interrupted and did not complete processing on file 'sessionlog1'. Either restore the backup set that was interrupted or restart the restore sequence.
Msg 3013, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
RESTORE LOG is terminating abnormally.
I checked it the backup directory and i can't locate the .CKP file.
Does anyone ever come accross this issue?
Is there anyother way i could recover this DB in a standby or norecovery mode.
Any kind of help to resolve this issue (beside copy the full backup and redo the whole log-shipping process again) would be appreciated. sicne my primary and secondary server are totally ina different location, i need to ship a tape, if i need a full backup. This is the 3rd time its happening on that cluster. its frustrating to ship a tape everytime this happens.
This application is developed in .NET Compact framework for Symbol Windows CE devices (MC3090). I am using SQL Compact edition as the database and uses merge replication to synchronize back and forth from Central SQL Server. The database is sitting in the SD Card, however when I suspended and restored the device while I am working with the application, it is giving me the following error message.
Error Code: 80004005 Message: OS Error: The OS storage system (RAM, CF, SD or IPSM) is not responding. Retry the operation. Minor Err: 25049 Source: SQL Server Compact Edition ADO.NET Data Provider
The error message occurs only when I am trying to work with the application after restoring the device from suspended state. I also found KB Article from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/919150 and it explains that this issue is fixed in SQL Server Compact Edition which is what I am using now.
Please any help on this issue is very much appreciated.
I'm trying to implement a sp_MSforeachsp howvever when I call sp_MSforeach_worker I get the following error can you please explain this problem to me so I can over come the issue.
Msg 16958, Level 16, State 3, Procedure sp_MSforeach_worker, Line 31
Could not complete cursor operation because the set options have changed since the cursor was declared.
Msg 16958, Level 16, State 3, Procedure sp_MSforeach_worker, Line 32
Could not complete cursor operation because the set options have changed since the cursor was declared.
Msg 16917, Level 16, State 1, Procedure sp_MSforeach_worker, Line 153
Cursor is not open.
here is the stored procedure:
Alter PROCEDURE [dbo].[sp_MSforeachsp]
@command1 nvarchar(2000)
, @replacechar nchar(1) = N'?'
, @command2 nvarchar(2000) = null
, @command3 nvarchar(2000) = null
, @whereand nvarchar(2000) = null
, @precommand nvarchar(2000) = null
, @postcommand nvarchar(2000) = null
AS
/* This procedure belongs in the "master" database so it is acessible to all databases */
/* This proc returns one or more rows for each stored procedure */
/* @precommand and @postcommand may be used to force a single result set via a temp table. */
declare @retval int
if (@precommand is not null) EXECUTE(@precommand)
/* Create the select */
EXECUTE(N'declare hCForEachTable cursor global for
How to implement distinct storage tiers on SQL Remote BLOB Storage (RBS)?
I want to use this SQL Feature to move files(images, videos, pdf files) from a database to a distinct database dedicated to RBS. Then I want to have several storage tiers, where objects will be saved and moved according access frequency. Old data will be arquived in cheap storage, but it must be always accessible if needed.
Description: - 1st and main tier: new and frequently accessed objects stored in high performance storage; - 2nd tier: automatically move older or less accessed objects to an inexpensive and different storage tier; - in all cases, all objects must be accessible to all users, but accessing to archived objects(2nd tier) will be much slower;
I am currently upgrading our ppc app (written in .net 2003) to .net 2005 and from sqlce 2.0 to 3.0. The new application runs out memory(storage) when handling lots of data transactions (both in case of using sqlcedatareader, and dataset ). There is no memory leak issue here, sqlce 3.0 simply uses a lot more (3 times more) memory than sqlce 2.0.
Our applicaton runs fine using sqlce 2.0 and .net 2003, but fail due to memory shortage
with the upgrades(which has the same code). Anyone can shed some lights on this issue?
I'm using SQL Server 2012 Analysis services in Tabular mode and connected to Oracle Database and while importing, I'm getting below error after importing some rows.
OLE DB or ODBC error: Accessor is not a parameter accessor.. The current operation was cancelled because another operation in the transaction failed.
I am a Windows developer for the IBM Tivoli Storage Manager Server (TSMS) product. Our product installation is built with InstallShield and uses the Windows Installer.
On a new installation of Windows 2003 x64 Storage Server R2, at a customer's site, the TSMS product fails to install. The install of the OS has version 3.01.400.3959 of the Windows Installer and I see no newer version that installs.
Part of our product is 32 bit (console) and another part is x64 (server). When installing I can see that the install's default is being redirected/reset to C:Program Files (x86)TivoliTSM after it is explicitly set by a custom action to ..Program Files.. . I further observe that our custom actions to write 64 bit registry entries are being refused.
REGSAM samMask = KEY_ALL_ACCESS; if ( regIsWow64Process () ) samMask = samMask | KEY_WOW64_64KEY; lStatus = RegCreateKeyEx( hLocalConnectKeyRoot, szSubkey, 0L, NULL, REG_OPTION_NON_VOLATILE, samMask, NULL, hKey, &dw ) ; The above fails to create the key.
We have tried four versions of our TSMS spanning many changes but the install acts the same. This does not happen on any other Windows OS we test on but we do not test on Windows 2003 Storage Server R2 being that it is an OEM product. We did test on Windows server 2003 R2 x64 and do not see this problem.
Do you have any suggestions on how to tackle this problem? I have full installation traces but can only see that the registry work is being refused. I can't see why.
Does anyone have any instructions on how to go about uprading a .sdf file from sqlce 2.0 to sqlce 3.0?
I found this on an msdn website (link: http://www.microsoft.com/sql/editions/sqlmobile/upgrading.mspx) but as you can see its very lacking on detail. (I included the link and content referring to upgrading the database files so you won't have to go to the link to see the part referring to upgrading the database.) I tried to run the upgrade.exe on my device but it doesn't explain how you're supposed to point it to the .sdf that you are trying to update. Here is the content on the above web page.
Upgrading Database Files You can upgrade a database created with an earlier version of SQL Server CE 2.0 to a database created with SQL Server Mobile by using the SQL Server Mobile Database Upgrade tool (upgrade.exe). The Database Upgrade tool runs on a smart device.
When you run the SQL Server Mobile Database Upgrade tool, the new SQL Server Mobile database is created on the smart device. The new database, with the file name extension .sdf, contains all the data that was in the source database. You need to reinitialize the upgraded database to continue using it for replication.
Note: If you are using replication or remote data access (RDA) as a connectivity solution before upgrading to SQL Server Mobile, you must synchronize the source SQL Server CE database (subscription database) with the SQL Server database (Publisher). The reason for synchronizing before upgrading to SQL Server Mobile is to ensure that any changes that exist in the tables on the SQL Server CE database are updated on the SQL Server database, because after the upgrade you must resubscribe or repull using the new database.
What can I do to make OnComplete and OnSuccess mean something in SQL Server 2000 DTS?I have this pretty simple package that imports data into a table from an XLS file, then runs an external console application which manipulates the data and drops into a different table.That data is then used to create a CSV file. If I execute each step individually, the whole thing works. But what it happening is that the end file is being created before the console app is finished.I have a workflow line (on complete) between the 2 processes, but that doesn't seem to mean anything. To run the external app I am just using an active x script task...CreateObject("WScript.Shell").Run "my file" Any advice?
My app is working on my local system with the vs2008 development server. It's an asp.net app and I added the line: AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetData("SQLServerCompactEditionUnderWebHosting", true);
So it works fine on my system. But I can't get it to work on shared hosting. I have uploaded all the sqlce 3.5 dlls to the bin directory. I am stuck at the error:
Access to the database file is not allowed. [ File name = ]
There actually is a file name in the connection string, and I set the permissions wide open on App_Data to test this.
What are the .net framework requirements for sqlce 3.5? I can't find this info anywhere.
I know sqlce 3.5 is not recommended for asp.net, but it is not the main site database but is used for a setup database utility to be installed for a windows app.
I have a SQL Server 7 box that is shortly to be rebuilt completely (still on NT4, but with new RAID system), does anyone have any advice on how I can make the transition as painless as possible? Particularly, I want to maintain the backup, security and DTS structures as much as possible.
'The Partial modifier is only required on one class definition per project. Partial Public Class StoredProcedures ''' <summary> ''' Create a result set on the fly and send it to the client. ''' </summary> <Microsoft.SqlServer.Server.SqlProcedure> _ Public Shared Sub SendTransientResultSet() ' Create a record object that represents an individual row, including it's metadata. Dim record As New SqlDataRecord(New SqlMetaData("stringcol", SqlDbType.NVarChar, 128) )
' Populate the record. record.SetSqlString(0, "Hello World!")
' Send the record to the client. SqlContext.Pipe.Send(record) End Sub End Class
Given this code, how do I add other SqlMetaData Columns to the statement:
Dim record As New SqlDataRecord(New SqlMetaData("stringcol", SqlDbType.NVarChar, 128) )
---
Like this???
Dim record As New SqlDataRecord(New SqlMetaData("stringcol", SqlDbType.NVarChar, 128),New SqlMetaData("otherstringcol", SqlDbType.NVarChar, 128) )
We have over 1000 terminals running CE 4.2 on an x86 cpu currently using SQLCE 3.1.
We have just upgraded to VS 2008 and found the projects have been upgraded to reference SQL CE 3.5 - this is great, as we wish to use things like TOP etc.
However, all the distributable packages only include CAB files for CE 4.2 for the ARM Processor, or CE 5.0 for the x86. Is there a CAB package available for CE 4.2 for the x86 CPU? (please...)
Even just the relevant .DLL files would be fine as we repackage them ourselves anyway.
Hi i developed Wm5 PPC application with sqlce database. i Create Cab file when i install in my HP WM5 PPC that will showe the Message sqlcewm.dll missed. Please tell me 1)sqlce30.ppc.wce5.armv4i 2)sqlce30.wce5.armv4i 3)sqlce20.ppc.wce5.armv4i..Please Help me
In my homegrown data layer, I added the ability to do Order By Clauses.
I do one query with an Order By clause (all 6 records in the table retrieved). Then I do a 2nd query without an Order By (36 of around 200 records in the table retrieved)
And I'm getting Native Exceptions.
ExceptionCode: 0xc00000000c (Null Pointer I believe) ExceptionAddresss: 0x00c3703c (looks to be in sqlcese30.dll) Reading: 0x00000005
I ran thru with the debugger, and am finding the error happening inside of a SQLDataReader.Read() call. It's trying to read the 14th of the 36 records that the query has found.
I am all but positive I'm not closing this database connection. The problem is happening while I'm looping off the reader data I just retrieved and in this query there was no ORDER BY clause.
I'm at a loss as to what to do about this. I'm not explicitly closing any database connections, and I'm getting the data right after performing the query.
I wrote a very simple C# console application which was designed to give us a rough idea on the performance and reliability of SQLCE (the source code without metrics has been posted to this group recently). What I've found is that there are major performance and reliability issues with SQLCE 3.0 as opposed to SQLCE 2.0. Whereas SQLCE 2.0 seems to be fairly consistent in terms of it's memory usage and the amount of time taken to insert rows into the table regardless of the size of the table (to a limit, after about 300,000 records it too has major performance issues), SQLCE 3.0 seems to slow down noticably and continually use more memory even after a few thousand records are inserted and actually crashes (consistently) after 25592 records are inserted!
What gives? Based on this it would seem that SQLCE 2.0 is far preferable for an unattended device that needs an uptime of over 30 days whilst constantly (several times per minute) inserting into the database.