Hello all,
Can I know somedetail about why the Sqlservr.exe app increasing in size drastically. Even I check all parameter of the server and I check the process running on server.
I feel server is not releasing the queues and It is occupying the memory. I any one suggest what could be the cause ?
Thanks,
Hello,
Does anyone know of a good process to increase a Column size of type char, that already had data in it, without losing the data you already have?
Thanks,
Kevin
I am having trouble increasing the size of the log device on a SQL 6.5 database. When I use SQL Enterprise Manager I get an error saying that the device has 0 MBs available. When I use the ALTER DB statement I get an error saying that there is not enough space on the disk, but I know this not to be the case. Has anyone any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Michael lawlor
Hello, relatively new to SQL Server.
I have a database with 1 .mdf data file and 1 .ldf t-log file. There are multiple inserts/deletes/transactions performed on the data daily, but the size of the two files remains constant (5,774,,336 and 153,480 respectively)??? I perform daily full backups and hourly T-log backups (during business hours of 9-6) and these backup files change size, but why aren't my physical DB files changing? I have them set to auto-grow at 10% unrestricted...
Thanks for your help/advice
Arthur
Hi all
I have a Publisher,distributor and subscriber in the same server
The distribution database size has increased upto 30GB (.mdf file)
what are the reasons that .mdf file would incease to such extent.
we do some data migration to tables which are replicated
is there a way we can reduce the distribution.mdf size?
Thanks
Is there a way to increase the size of the procedure cache. Or is it only a auto configuring option.
I have 2gb of memory, and when I check the size of the procedure cache it is just 10mb. I would like to increase this to around 50mb. Not sure if there is an setting to do this. Had a look on BOL could not find anything.
thanks
Jane
Just wondering if you could help me on this one. I'm not sure if mytransaction logs are behaving oddly or what. I've successfuly managedto shrink my transaction logs from 7GB down to 1MB and now I find itstrange that the log file doesn't seem to increase its size. Thetimestamp of the logfile is updating as well. But the size of the fileis constant. I haven't configured my database to do auto-shrink so Imreally confused why it hasn't changed its size for more than a monthnow.Hope I'm not losing any data here.Kindly advise.
View 7 Replies View Related
i have a very big database and number of people are working on it.. it's log file size is increaseing very day too much.. i am taking log back every 30mint...
i dont' know that wethare i need to truncate the log file after taking the log file backup or not.. i am taking differentail backup every day and full backup every week...
Please tell me do i need to trucate the log file to reduce the file size or i hv to leave as it....
Thanks..
Thanks to all participants.
I am using SQL Server 2000 with replication object for two location. Log size on publisher go upto 25 times of data file size, I mean 80 MB Data files has maintains 2 GB log file and it is same for all five co's working on same windows 2000 advanced server board.
Since last week server randamly get disconnected from user applications and at that time few tables are not openable at server.
Can any one give a reason ? Why this type misbehaviou done by SQL Server 2000?
Thanks.
I have a database which is centered around two date tables (approx. 5.5 million records each). We are finally making the big leap from SQL Server 2005 to 2012. The data is currently stored as datetime, and we are hoping to take advantage of the new date datatype, since the time component is not needed.
The first table has 13 different date columns. In testing on the 2012 server I have changed 3 columns so far, and have seen that changing the datatype to date is actually increasing the Index size and not affecting the data size. Only 3 of the columns are associated with indexes, and modifying a non-indexed column still increased the index size. I am running the Disk Usage by Table report to view the sizes.
Hi to all,
I am using a connection string like
data source=RemoteHostName;initial catalog=myDb;password=sa;user id=sa;
Max pool size = 200;
And now strange thing is happening ,, I am receiving error :
Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to obtaining a connection
from the pool. This may have occurred because all pooled connections were in
use and max pool size was reached
The SqlServer Activity Manager is telling that only 100 connections are pooled, and I guess that the Max pool size is 100, It is not being changed by my Connection string. As I am trying to change the default 100 pool size value to 200.
Huh , So stucked up , how to increase the Max pool size.. Is there any way .
I am getting worrried.
Any help ??
Thx and Regards
hi
when my site is being used, sqlservr.exe is using 100% of CPU..
why this happening ?
please help me..
hello,
We are having an issue with tempdb growth and even after restarting the server and the shrinkfile command the tempdb still holds on to nearly 15 GB of space.
I found this article on the microsoft website which recommended that we stop SQL server and retart it from the commad prompt using the sqlservr -c -f command. After this we go to SQL Analyzer and run the shrinkfile.
I gave the sqlservr command on a friday evening in our test enviroment and I come back on monday morning and it is still not completed and i had to close the window and start SQL Server from Windows.
Is there something that i am missing here that i should know about the sqlservr command. Is there anything else that someone could recommend regarding shrinking the tempdb.
thanks
Happy new year and merry xmas to everyone
I got SQL 2005 Express edition with Sharepoint Server 2007 installed and its running 100% CPU all the time
there are plenty threads like this out there but none have an answer
anyone got ideas?
I am trying to resize a database initial log file from 500M to 2M. I€™m using€?
ALTER DATABASE <DBNAME> MODIFY FILE ( NAME = <DBLOGFILENAME, SIZE = 2 ) "
And I'm getting "MODIFY FILE failed. Specified size is less than current size." I tried going into the database properties and setting the log file to 2M, but it doesn€™t keep the changes.
Any help with this process?
SQL 7.0(SP3) on NT Server(SP5)
The sqlservr.exe process is using almost 800MB of memory in Task Manager. We have 1GB physical RAM. The swapfile is on C: with min=950/max=1050MB. Is this normal? I think there may be some kind of memory leak. Any ideas?? Please HELP!
Rob
Help ! My sqlservr service is running at 100% and my server is dog slow. I don see anything unusual when looking at current activity or sp_who2. I have restarted it a few times.. ANy suggestions? I only have one database in production on this server and there are only about 10 users hitting it..
View 4 Replies View RelatedArghhh, login to sqlserver and issue this query:
Code:
SELECT @@VERSION
and tell us what comes out.
Seev here for reference.
I have been dealing with an intermittent problem for several months that manifests itself on my computer as well as a customers computer. It is happening so often, upon booting the computer, that I just open and then minimize the Task Manager so that it will be in the Tool Tray and the bargraph will be visible.
From time to time the processor bargraph will "Max out" and when I open Task Manager and click on CPU in the Processes Tab, SQLServr.exe is using 99% of the CPU.
In Enterprise Manager I have set maximum Memory to 25% of the available system memory. I have tried this in both Fixed mode as well as Dynamic mode, no change.
I was told that there was a SQL Server version that was susceptible to a WORM that caused this. I have since upgraded to SQL ver. 8.0.194. I'm not sure of the version that I replaced, but I thought that the previous version was the one that was susceptible to the worm.
Has anyone fought this battle and if so can you offer any experience or advice?
Thanks very much for your help,
Doc
Hi all,
I have a problem with sqlservr.exe (version 2005). It use alot of memory. I check on taskbar manager sqlservr.exe usage (CPU 10 - 20%, Mem usage - 1,493,688/2GB Ram). I dont know how can I fix it. Some body could help me please.
Thanks
Doan Jung
Hi all,
I have a problem with sqlservr.exe (version 2005). It use alot of memory. I check on taskbar manager sqlservr.exe usage (CPU 10 - 20%, Mem usage - 1,493,688/2GB Ram). I dont know how can I fix it. Some body could help me please.
Thanks
Doan Jung
Hi,
I have asked this question on the MSDN forums
with no response as yet. Maybe you guys can
shed some light on this:
http://forums.microsoft.com/MSDN/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=2826915&SiteID=1
We have an apparent File Handle leak occurring in our SQL server.
Last weekend the server ran out of non-paged pool space:
Event ID 2019 -The server was unable to allocate from the system
nonpaged pool because the pool was empty.
In the process monitor the sqlservr.exe process had Mem Usage
of 503,528KB and a handle count of 3,306,263 (!). Using poolmon
the highest usage of the non-paged pool was for the Muta tag, with
211,610,768 Bytes. Restarting the sql service fixes this
temporarily, but already we are back to 427,000 handles for
sqlservr.exe and climbing steadily at about 200,000 handles
per day.
Is there a fix for this?
Cheers,
Geoff
PS
We have:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3054.00 (Intel X86)
Mar 23 2007 16:28:52
Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Enterprise Edition
on Windows NT 5.2 (Build 3790: Service Pack 2)
(Meaning Windows Server 2003 R2 SP2 :-) )
Hello All,On all of my SQL servers (2000 with SP3), when I go to task manager andlook at memory usage, sqlservr.exe is always at 1.7gigs. If I reducethe maximum to let's say 1 gig it will go down to 1 gig. But if it iseven at 2gigs or 3 gigs it will be showing 1.7 gigs. Why? Is is ok toreduce the memory usage of sqlservr.exe?Raziq.*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've a SQL 7 SP3 server that was running for more than 6 months without any problem and hence I never give much thought to it other than the monitoring the growth of the database size.
Just the other day, I was pretty shocked to see that SQLSERVR.EXE was using nearly 1 GB of RAM (and I have 1 GB of physical RAM)!!! My database size is only about 2 GB and there aren't many simultaneous users online. This database is used for a web application.
Today I have the opportunity to restart the SQLServer service (to apply the security hotfix). And I'm pretty dismay to see its memory usage climbing steadily at the rate of around 20 to 30 KB every few seconds. I guess it'd hit 1 GB in a matter of hours or days..
Now, I've a similar server on another machine.. but its SQLSERVR.EXE is only using around 20 MB and it doesnt grow much.
So..what should I do?? Ideas? Suggestions? Thanks!!
Why does my Sqlservr.exe file take up 200 megs of my nt memory. When i control alt delete and go into task manager, sqlservr.exe is always at the top of the memory usage list.
Melissa
Can someone please explain what exit code 259 means as it appears in the debug output below?
When running a C# Stored Procedure within the VS 2005 IDE I receive the following Debug Output:
Auto-attach to process '[1152] [SQL] enterprise' on machine 'enterprise' succeeded.
Debugging script from project script file.
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x150) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x1314) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x1314) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_32mscorlib2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089mscorlib.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'c:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL ServerMSSQL.1MSSQLBinnSqlAccess.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_32System.Data2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.Data.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_32System.Transactions2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.Transactions.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Security2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3aSystem.Security.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
Auto-attach to process '[1152] sqlservr.exe' on machine 'enterprise' succeeded.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Xml2.0.0.0__b77a5c561934e089System.Xml.dll', Skipped loading symbols. Module is optimized and the debugger option 'Just My Code' is enabled.
'sqlservr.exe' (Managed): Loaded 'SQL2005_Test', No symbols loaded.
'ENTERPRISE;.Net SqlClient Data Provider;4400' (Managed): Loaded 'C:WINDOWSassemblyGAC_MSILSystem.Configuration2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3aSystem.Configuration.dll', No symbols loaded.
CurrencyCode Name ModifiedDate
------------ -------------------------------------------------- -----------------------
eee MyCurr4 3/20/2007 12:58:38 PM
(1 row(s) affected)
(1 row(s) returned)
Finished running sp_executesql.
The thread 'enterprisesqlexpress [56]' (0x1314) has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program '[1152] [SQL] enterprise: enterprisesqlexpress' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
The program '[1152] sqlservr.exe: Managed' has exited with code 259 (0x103).
I would also appreciate hearing back from users as to why I only have two choices in my VS 2005 IDE Output window (Build and Debug). From what I've read, 'Database' should be another choice for 'Show output from:'.
My environment consists of the following:
Database:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 - 9.00.3042.00 (Intel X86) Feb 9 2007 22:47:07 Copyright (c) 1988-2005 Microsoft Corporation Express Edition on Windows NT 5.1 (Build 2600: Service Pack 2)
I have verified the SQL Server connection has 'Allow SQL/CLR Debugging' enabled.
The Visual Studio 2005 IDE is:
8.0.50727.762 (SP.050727-7600)
Running Microsoft .Net Framework version 2.0.50727
Dear Friends,
I have developed my web application using ASP.Net with MS SQL SERVER Express Edition SP2 .
I have hosting it at some where which i can remote and see the service of sqlservr.exe .
The first start of this service take the memory space just only 25 MB but after this service run upto one week it increased up to 200MB .This service won't realease from the memory untill unless i restart the server or restart its service.
1.Could any one tell me why this service continue increasingly ?.
2.What can i configure in MS SQL SERVER 2005 EXPRESS Edition to let this release from the memory without restart the server or its service ?.
Best Regards,
Channarith Hun.
I keep getting different answers from different people on regarding if you can or cannot kill the hosting sql server process with an unsafe assembly. Can you do this? If so could you please attach a sample demonstrating this?
Thanks,
Derek
Why is the PasswordRecovery control creating another sqlservr process after I successfully enter the user name, and for a reason I have not found yet it keeps the database in a read only modem then when I answer my security question correctly it gives me the error:
Failed to update database "C:INETPUBWWWROOTVER1.0.0.1APP_DATAASPNETDB.MDF" because the database is read-only.
I read other post regarding the read only message and I don't if there doing the same thing, but why does this happen and what is the solution to this other not using the control?
Hello everyone,
I have my minimum server memory in SQL set to 4GB, but in my Windows Task Manager, sqlservr.exe only has about 100MB.
Does anyone have any idea why task manager doesn't show the full amount?
Thanks in advance.
Jarret
Hello,
I'm havin a problem with my database server in the network, i'm running a windows 2003 server standard edition with sql server 2005 standard edition.
the problem is that the server get stock and the performance of the whole network is affected, when i use the tak manager to monitor the performance i can see that the sqlservr.exe proccess is using 1,397,928 k of memory usage, in the performance monitor the graphics get crazy and the cpu usage grows up untill 85%.
Can you please let me know if there is something that i can do to normalize the server performance in order to let the network user work with the applications feeded by this server.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Hi i have installed sql server 2000 on xp window and facing error of connection failed, check sql server registration what it mean pleas guide me.
webmaster http://www.GlobalGuideLine.com
Hi,
I've SQL Server 2005 Dev Edition and Windows Server 2003 ENT SP2.
in the task manager i see that the server use 5GB out of 6GB,but when i arrange the process to see whom takes all the memory i see that the sqlservr.exe takes 150MB(he is the biggest).
when i open Perfmon and look on the sqlservr.exe memory use, i see that he takes the 4.5G.
i've a problem that the server use alot of cpu time to run users queries,i see that pages/sec counter is very big average between 600-800.
is there any problem with my memory?
why the memory reading from the task manager is wrong?
if my pages/sec counter is so big do i have a memory leaks + pressure?
THX