hi all,
I was under the impression that SQL Server 2005 can install on dual processor, quad core Intel machines.
Here's what we have: Intel Quad Core Xeon (E7340) @ 2.4Ghz. (8 way)
Has anyone encountered any issues w/ this setup -- particularly on this Intel CPU version?
thank you,
Cosmin
I am new to this so I hope I'm doing it right.
We are in the process of replacing a computer that currently has SQL 2005 Management Studio Express installed. We are looking at a Intel Core 2 Quad processor (Q6700) and want to know if SQL will be able to make full use of a quad core. Thanks
We are in process of moving to 64 bit HP servers with sql2005 standard edition. We were just wondering which is better option, to get a server with 2 dual core processor or to get a srver with just 4 processor? How does SQL2005 handle the hypertheading of dual processor?
Thanks,
Carlos
ok i have intel dual core i have a conflict only in playing a game black hawk down it gives me a run stop error. locks up and has to be restarted. microsoft gave me a fix but when i do the fix it causes me to get a system dump error on the game. i can update my web site do anything else let daughter play her games or do her school work and nothing happens. i was told i needed to set up the dual core so that my programs dont conflict i am a moron when it comes to computers is there a fix for this or i am i just going to have to go back to single core processor for now thanks
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am looking at running SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition in a clustered environment (2 nodes) and am not sure if the 4 processor limit applies to the number of processors per node or the number of processors it will run on in the entire cluster. Could someone please clarify this for me?
View 4 Replies View Related
Hi
-I have istalled sql server 2005 standard edition , I want to install sql server 2005 enterprise edition on the same machine.
Is it possible? I have Microsoft windows server 2003 SP2 and 1GB RAM.
I want to use partition function with the enterprise edition, will the trial version of sql server work for me?
-If I have already created a database and tables using the standard edition, will I be able to access and use the database using the installed trial version or will I have to start a fresh creating a new database?
- Is it possible to access the same database with any of the installed versions?
BTW, I am prety new to sql server and databases , I am trying to learn by myself
Thanks
The number of data files within a single filegroup should equal to the number of CPU cores. So for a quad core CPU there should be 4 data files. Is there anything that one need to take care besides creating the data files for a filegroup. I belieev SQL takes care of itself how to update data files .
View 5 Replies View RelatedDoes SQL 2005 Enterprise utilize Xeon Quad Cores? or should i go with Dual Cores?
if it DOESNT, any idea if they plan on releasing a service back to allow it to?
When Standard Edition says it supports 4 processors, is this just the physical processor or do we have to factor in multiple cores?
If SE supports 4 physical quad-core processors, is it written to optimally utilize the quad-core technology or would I be better off using Enterprise Edition?
Dave
With two 64 bit quad core processors on the server, we have 8 processor cores. Does this mean that we'll need Windows Server 2003 x64 Enterprise edition because Standard only supports up to 4-way SMP?
Thanks!
Hi
I have installed SQL Server Express 2005 on my machine.
I want to install SQL Server Standard Edition 2005 on my machine to check new services it has.
Can these 2 Editions coexist with each other, or any troubles you think might encounter?
Thanks
I am attempting to install SQL Server 2005 on a Laptop with Windows 2003 Standard Edition.
The installation fails and the File Summary.txt has the following entries:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 9.00.1399.06
==============================
OS Version : Microsoft Windows Server 2003 family, Standard Edition Service Pack 2 (Build 3790)
Time : Fri Nov 30 09:36:53 2007
Machine : SAPDEMO
Product : Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English)
Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
Install : Successful
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLSupport_1.log
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine : SAPDEMO
Product : Microsoft SQL Server Native Client
Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
Install : Successful
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLNCLI_1.log
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine : SAPDEMO
Product : Microsoft SQL Server VSS Writer
Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
Install : Successful
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SqlWriter_1.log
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine : SAPDEMO
Product : Microsoft SQL Server Setup Support Files (English)
Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
Install : Successful
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLSupport_2.log
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine : SAPDEMO
Product : Microsoft SQL Server Native Client
Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
Install : Successful
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLNCLI_2.log
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine : SAPDEMO
Product : Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Books Online (English)
Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
Install : Successful
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_BOL_1.log
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Machine : SAPDEMO
Product : SQLXML4
Product Version : 9.00.1399.06
Install : Successful
Log File : C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLXML4_1.log
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL Server Setup failed. For more information, review the Setup log file in %ProgramFiles%Microsoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGSummary.txt.
Time : Fri Nov 30 09:38:41 2007
List of log files:
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_Core(Local).log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLSupport_1.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLNCLI_1.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SqlWriter_1.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_MSXML6_1.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLSupport_2.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLNCLI_2.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_BOL_1.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SQLXML4_1.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_Datastore.xml
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_.NET Framework 2.0.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_Core.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGSummary.txt
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_.NET Framework 2.0 LangPack.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_.NET Framework Upgrade Advisor.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_.NET Framework Upgrade Advisor LangPack.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_.NET Framework Windows Installer.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_.NET Framework Windows Installer LangPack.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SNAC.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_Support.log
C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup BootstrapLOGFilesSQLSetup0006_SAPDEMO_SCC.log
The Log File, SQLSetup0004_<hostname>_Core.log, has the following entries:
Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Setup beginning at Mon Dec 03 08:54:09 2007
Process ID : 2980
C:SAP_CDCD2x86EnterpriseEditionServerssetup.exe Version: 2005.90.1399.0
Running: LoadResourcesAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Complete: LoadResourcesAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Running: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Loaded DLL:C:SAP_CDCD2x86EnterpriseEditionServersxmlrw.dll Version:2.0.3604.0
Complete: ParseBootstrapOptionsAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Running: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Complete: ValidateWinNTAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Running: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Complete: ValidateMinOSAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Running: PerformSCCAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Complete: PerformSCCAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Running: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Complete: ActivateLoggingAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Delay load of action "DetectPatchedBootstrapAction" returned nothing. No action will occur as a result.
Action "LaunchPatchedBootstrapAction" will be skipped due to the following restrictions:
Condition "EventCondition: __STP_LaunchPatchedBootstrap__2980" returned false.
Running: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Loaded DLL:C:WINDOWSsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.4042
Loaded DLL:C:WINDOWSsystem32msi.dll Version:3.1.4000.4042
Complete: PerformSCCAction2 at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Running: PerformDotNetCheck at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Complete: PerformDotNetCheck at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9, returned true
Running: ComponentUpdateAction at: 2007/11/3 8:54:9
Complete: ComponentUpdateAction at: 2007/11/3 8:55:6, returned true
Running: DetectLocalBootstrapAction at: 2007/11/3 8:55:6
Complete: DetectLocalBootstrapAction at: 2007/11/3 8:55:6, returned true
Running: LaunchLocalBootstrapAction at: 2007/11/3 8:55:6
Error: Action "LaunchLocalBootstrapAction" threw an exception during execution. Error information reported during run:
"C:Program FilesMicrosoft SQL Server90Setup Bootstrapsetup.exe" finished and returned: 1605
Aborting queue processing as nested installer has completed
Message pump returning: 1605
Regards
Hi,
I am running MSSQL 2005 Standard edition on a two processor Intel Xeon 3GHz (dual-core) with 8GB RAM.
I notice in "Windows task manager CPU performance" while running a long SQL statement (takes 1.5 hours), only 1 logical (out of 4) is utilised at >70%. The remaining 3 logical processors hover around 10%
Using Performance monitor, the average read queue, write queue, and pages/sec also hovers around 25%, indicating no heavy physical disk/memory loading.
How can I set to utilise more physical/logical processor to improve the MSSQL performance ?
Thanks.
Hi,Is there a reason why we have to pay more for licensing for a differentkind of processor?Why are we not charged for the Hyperthreading on some processors also.If Oracle is really conserned about the low end business market (smalland medium), then they should drop their attitude on Dual Coreprocessors.If they start charging as if it was a normal processor, and ask thenormal price, then they would get more of this market coming in.As long as Oracle keeps on having the attitude of charging more,because Intel or some other cpu vendor decided to mprove theirprocessors because of overheating problems, I will have the attitudethat I will keep on reoccomending alternatives for Orcle like Mysql /Postgre sql / Sybase, etc to the small/medium sector.Microsoft's pricing model on double core processors suddenly soundallot better.Oracle are shooting themselves in the foot! Or am I the only personfeeling this way?Shaun O'Reilly
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to install SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition on a new Windows Server 2003 machine that has SQL Server 2005 Express Edition installed by a backup application (Backup Exec). Will I need to uninstall the express edition in order to install the standard edition? Can the two coexist as separate instances or will the standard edition installation simply upgrade the express installation?
Thanks
We are in the process of installing SQL 2005 Standard Edition on Servers with two Intel Xeon 2.6Ghz processors. We want to buy a processor licence for each server rather than CAL's, but do we have to buy two processor licences or is it possible to configure SQL 2005 to only use one processor on a dual processor server and thus only need to buy a single processor licence.
View 5 Replies View RelatedHi,
I am running SQL7 SP2 on a Compaq Proliant 5500 (NT4 Server SP6a) with dual processor.
When trying to schedule any jobs with DTSRUN I get the following error:
DTSRun.exe - Application Error
The instruction at "0x77f64d7b" referenced memory at "0x00000010". The memory could not be read.
Has anyone seen this error before ??
Regards,
Tim
I currently have a single proc server in production and want to maintain a spare server that is dual-proc.
Is there a technical problem installing a single license SQL 2000 Standard on a dual-proc server? WIll it allow it or is it actually just a legal licensing requirement?
Would there be any issues with installing an MSSQL 2000 32 bit instance onto a windows 2003 64 bit server?
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhen i install sql server 2000 i have a message
" Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition Server Component is not supported on this operating system only client components will be available for installation"
Hence I cannot install properly. I installed only the client componets. Thereafter when I went through Enterprise Manager and tried to establish a connection, I failed. It said server does not exist.
What to do now?
I found out that if one has sql server 2000 standard editon the prerequisties are
Microsoft Windows NT Server 4.0 with Service Pack 5 or later, Windows NT Server 4.0 Enterprise Edition with Service Pack 5 or later, Windows 2000 Server, Windows 2000 Advanced Server, or Windows 2000 Datacenter Server.
I have windows xp professional version on which i am installing sql server standard edition.
Which of the above exists in my OS. Or which should I download.
Thanks
I've installed VS2005 Standard Edition onto a machine running XP Home
View 11 Replies View RelatedI am dealing with the same issue posted in this other thread that seems to have died with no solution found:
http://forums.microsoft.com/TechNet/ShowPost.aspx?PostID=1131407&SiteID=17
Almost as soon as I start to install SQL 2005 on my Windows XP Pro Version 2002 Service Pack 2 machine at work it pops up a dialog with one of the following 2 error messages (they alternate randomly):
The SQL Server System Configuration Checker cannot be executed due to WMI configuration on the machine PCF092191 Error:2147500034 (0x80004002).
The SQL Server System Configuration Checker cannot be executed due to WMI configuration on the machine PCF092191 Error:2147749907 (0x80041013).
After clicking OK the installation just closes.
I also discovered when I load wmimgmt.msc and click Properties on the WMI Control, I get the following errors on the General tab, AND it does not allow me to click on any other tabs:
Failed to initialize all required WMI classes.
Win32_Processor: <Null>: No such interface supported
Win32_WMISetting: Successful
Security information: Successful
Win32_OperatingSystem: <Null>: No such interface supported
I have been searching online for days and tried doing virtually everything I found that I could understand and nothing works. Reinstalling WMI off the XP CD doesn't work, rebuilding the WMI repository doesn't work, registering all the WMI DLLs and MOF files doesn't work, running all the various scripts to fix WMI that are posted all over online doesn't work.
I downloaded the Microsoft WMI Diagnostics tool and ran it. It printed a ton of errors in a 466-line report that I can't make head or tail of. 6 here, 33 there, 27 over there...almost too many to count. The suggestions it gives to fix them range from vague and incomplete to incomprehensible. I'll paste those error results into a followup post.
I installed the WMI Tools package and can't figure out what to do with any of the tools at all. The only thing I noticed is that when examining a section under Win32_Processor, most entries for various properties are marked <empty>, while I have seen people discussing what I think are those same properties online and talking about seeing stuff typed into theirs (such as the HostingModel having LocalServiceHost typed in and ImpersonationLevel having 1 typed in). But there are so many properties and I'm not sure what should be typed into all of them or if I'm even looking in the right place.
I've seen some suggestions in WMI documentation that not all WMI errors may be related to WMI itself at all, which I think might be the case here, but I don't know. Some material said DCOM may be the problem, but I didn't have much luck figuring out how to fix that either. From the WMI Diagnostics it looks like there may be multiple errors of different kinds, but if it's that bad, I don't know how my computer's been working at all.
I've been using this computer for 9 months and had no major problems with it, although I did have a problem installing Microsoft Windows Genuine Advantage Notification, for which Microsoft sent me a script that fixed it. One other person here at work is suffering from this same WMI error, but most people have been able to install SQL 2005 here with no problem.
My boss does not want me to just do a full XP reinstall. He wants me to identify the specific problem and fix it. If this was my home computer I wouldn't spend so much time banging my head over this incomprehensible problem. But a full reinstall is not really an option for me in this case, unless maybe Microsoft says that's the only way to fix it.
I am available to deal with this issue during 9 to 5 eastern time Monday to Friday.
Thanks in advance for any help...
Eric
This is (some of) the output from the Core(Local)log:
If possible, determine action
Machine = DJONES-XP, Article = WMIServiceWin32OSWorking, Result = 2147500034 (0x80004002)
Machine = DJONES-XP, Article = WMIServiceWin32CompSystemWorking, Result = 2147500034 (0x80004002)
Machine = DJONES-XP, Article = WMIServiceWin32ProcessorWorking, Result = 2147500034 (0x80004002)
Machine = DJONES-XP, Article = WMIServiceReadRegWorking, Result = 0 (0x0)
Machine = DJONES-XP, Article = WMIServiceWin32DirectoryWorking, Result = 70347 (0x112cb)
Machine = DJONES-XP, Article = WMIServiceCIMDataWorking, Result = 70347 (0x112cb)
Machine = DJONES-XP, Article = XMLDomDocument, Result = 0 (0x0)
*******************************************
Setup Consistency Check Report for Machine: DJONES-XP
*******************************************
Article: WMI Service Requirement, Result: Error
Description: Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) is not functioning properly. Further checks cannot be performed. Action: Please make sure Windows Management Instrumentation (WMI) is functioning properly.
The SQL Server System Configuration Checker cannot be executed due to WMI configuration on the machine DJONES-XP Error:2147500034 (0x80004002).
The checkResult returned is 2147500034
The checkResult for local machine returned by CheckSCCResult is 70036
Setup is unable to proceed because one of scc articles failed. Please address those errors before continuing the setup.
Thanks DeWayne
I have a windows 2003 server with the latest service pack and patches. This server also acts a domain controller.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHello!M a newbie.. I just want to know, that wots the difference b/w SQL Server Standard Edition and Express Edition.?And can I use Visual Studio 2005 (Professional Edition) with SQL Server Express Edition.?
View 1 Replies View RelatedDear All,We have a database which contains many tables which have millions ofrecords. When We attach the database with MS SQL Server 2005 StandardEdition Server and run some queries (having joins, filters etc.) thenthey take very long time to execute while when We execute same querieson Enterprise Edition then they run 10 times faster than on standardedition.Our database does not use any features which are present in EnterpriseEdition and not present in Standard Edition. We want to know what arethe differences between Standard Edition and Enterprise Edition forperformance. Why should we go for Enterprise Edition when StandardEdition has all the features required.We are presently using evaluation versions of SQL Server 2005 Standardand Enterprise Editions.Thanks and regards,Nishant Sainihttp://www.simplyjava.com
View 23 Replies View RelatedI am attempting to upgrade a 2005 Standard Edtion to Enterprise Edition. This is a default instance. All components are upgraded successfully except the Database Engine. I receive the following error:
SQL Server Setup has encountered the following problem: [Microsoft][SQL Native Client][SQL Server]The certificate cannot be dropped because one or more entities are either signed or encrypted using it.. To continue, correct the problem, and then run SQL Server Setup again.
This installation does not have encryption enabled, so I do not undersand the error or how to correct it.
After rebooting the SQL instance appears to be upgraded to Enterprise, but it cannot be upgraded to SP2.
Thanks,
Hi all--I'm researching the cleanest downgrade path from a trial edition of SQL Server 2005 Enterprise to a licensed Standard Edition copy. It looks like downgrading will entail uninstalling the old version and installing the new version, but I'd like to save the original setup as much as possible. Detaching the old databases will preserve the non-system databases; what method would work best for restoring the system databases?
Thanks!
- Jon
I'd like to upgrade from my current SQL Server version: 09.00.3042 (Workgroup edition that comes with SBS upgrade) to the standard edition that I've just purchased. I've attempted to run setup.exe SKUUPGRADE=1 from the command prompt and it just tells me that there's nothing new to install.
I don't really want to uninstall the current installation just to do something that shouldn't be complicated to do, upgrading software versions should not be a difficult process.
Does anybody have any experience with this?
As an ISV, I want to certify my product on Standard Edition. I am using Developer Edition everywhere. Is there a way I can do the certification using the Developer Edition, or do I need to obtain/purchase a copy of the Standard Edition?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi.
I am not able to install "SQL 2005 Server Express Edition " on my AMD64 bit Pc..
My OS is: Windows XP Pro (SP 2)
Plz help me as soon as possible..
Mandar
I tried to download PerformancePoint Server Trial Version to ther server today and I got to the configuration point of the Analysis Services Setting, and when I clicked next to proceed with the configuration I got a popup error message:
"Microsoft Analysis Server must be Evaluation, Developer or Enterprise Edition".
Now I have SQL Server 2005 Developer Edition Disc (Bought it with Visual Studio 2005) but on the server I have SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition, if I try to run the sql server developer Edition disc, I use the wizard download and it seems that the download is going through the SQL Server entire download, it's like I'm re-downloading SQL Server all over again.
Does that seem right?
what is the best approach to work around this probelm?
I appreciate any help
Thanks
Hello everybody,
I got a problem in my development phase. I'm developing a web-application system that running merge database technology which is centralized database and distributed database. This is because my customer want a highly optimum system standby.
My centralized database running SQL Server 2005 Standard Edition and the distributed database running SQL Server 2005 Express Edition (because it is free). Each of these database, the users can change the data on its database. So, every database must have the same data. from my understanding, each server must act as Publisher and Subscriber. Can SQL Server 2005 Express Edition be a Publisher?
If not, what the solution you all may suggest, because cost is the first factor. If my architecture is not correct, so what you all suggest to me to resolve the problem.
Thanks so much. Any suggestion and opinion is highly appreciate and I'm highly thanks to you all.