If I stop MSSQLServer service on my SQL7 server using net stop and then restart it seconds later with net start, how will this affect my users ? Will they notice this ? Gets disconnected ?
I have SQL2000 server installed and then SQL management studio 2008 R2 express edition in users desktop. I noticed that the user can stop the SQL server agent. Even a user is a reader access only.
We have an existing SSRS server, and have just created a new child domain. We'll be migrating users from the parent to the child, and want to add the users of that new domain with access to SSRS. In the parent domain they are able to access, but after migration with the child domain account, they cannot.
I have added the group CHILDDomain Users with a system user role on SSRS, and PARENTDomain Users was already there.
Is there any additional step I should/could take to get this active?
Anyone got any "gotchas" or "nightmares" they want to share out of experience where the services have been shutdown without the proper forethought?
I'm trying to put a case in for a SQL DBA to be paged and to be in charge of shutting down the services and/or put together a checklist of things to verify first.
While I realize shutting down the services is supposed to be a graceful shutdown process I'm willing to bet there are a host of considerations.
Recently upgraded a 6.5 server to a 7.0 server. (same server) When we try to stop the 6.5 service, the 7.0 service stops too. Why is this happening? Aren't the 6.5 and 7.0 installations supposed to be independent of each other once the upgrade is done.
Further we would like to uninstall the 6.5 server from the machine as it is no longer being used. What considerations need be taken into account in our scenario.
I'm hosting sqlserver 2005 developer edition locally on windows vista.
I'm getting messages for allot of stuff.
I can't restart, stop, or start my sql server instance.
I can't start the full-text search service.
I get this when I try to start the full-text search service.
===================================
Unable to start service MSFTESQL on server PAUL-PC.
===================================
Access Denied (ObjectExplorer)
------------------------------ Program Location:
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.ObjectExplorer.Service.CheckServiceActionReturnValueSuccess(UInt32 returnValue) at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.ObjectExplorer.Service.Start()
And when I try to restart the instance...
===================================
Unable to stop service MSSQLSERVER on server PAUL-PC.
===================================
Access Denied (ObjectExplorer)
------------------------------ Program Location:
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.ObjectExplorer.Service.CheckServiceActionReturnValueSuccess(UInt32 returnValue) at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.ObjectExplorer.Service.Stop(Boolean stopDependentServices)
Hello, SQL Server 2000 services getting stoped automatically when system get reboot. When system reboot they started and after 5 minutes they were getting stoped. I went through the event log file and found that an error is occuring in sql server with number 17148.
And I also observed that there is a file called "C : P r o g r a m F i l e s V E R I T A S B a c k u p E x e c N T b e n g i n e . e x e" is executing during the maintenance process,which is stopping the sql server services(agent and olap)
This problem is generating error in sql server with above mentioned number.
I've been dealing with a few problems with SQL Server 2005.
We don't want to give our DBA's local administrator access to the servers so we had a problem with SSIS which I managed to resolve by adding their global group into the local DCOm group and modifying the security properties of MsDtsServer.
Another problem I've come across is when you log into Management Studio as an account that has local administrator access to the server you have the Green symbol next to the registered server, you can then right click and Stop, Restart services etc.
If I log into Management Studio with an account that has full SQL sysadmin rights but not local administrator rights to the server then the Green symbol doesn't appear and the Stop, restart options are all greyed out - all other functionality appears okay, they just seem to lose the ability to remotely stop and start services.
All of the above is with Windows Firewall turned off, if the user has local administrator rights but the SQL Server has the Windows Firewall switched on they are unable to remotely stop and restart services.
Port 1433 is open on the firewall and program execptions are there for sqlbrowse.exe
Anyone come across this particular problem before?
hi at my work place some of the users migrated to another domain even thought with new domain name they can access SQL Server but user who are part of sysadmin(part of some group) on the box unable to execute a job. it means at operating system level newdomainuser credentials are get resolved that's why users are able to access box but why not able to execute jobs. why sysadmin Privilege not get resolved at SQL Server level very confused............
I have an agent service account that works fine - the account that jobs run under.
I know it works fine because this is the same account all my SQL Backup jobs run under - without a hitch.
I also have a valid sql server account that I use for connection string logins when building packages -
that account works fine. I know it works fine because I can login to the SQL Server Manager with this account.
So, I build a package with the sql server account and password for the OLE DB connection manager in a package. All the package does is a simple query on a table and outputs to a flat file.
I create a job, with 'sa' as the owner. in step 1 I select SSIS package, run as SQL Agent Service Account, package source is file system and I point to the package. The package itself uses the sql server login account to execute.
If I run the package it works fine. I close the solution, someone else comes along and opens the solution - THEY CHANGE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT THE LOGIN OR SQL AGENT SERVICE ACCOUNT, but apparently just the fact that they opened the solution and looked at the package, breaks the login. If they try to run the package, they get a login failure, whereas I did not. After they close it, it breaks for me as well. If they open the solution, open the connection manager, re-enter the sql login's password, the package works fine for them, until I come along and open the solution, then it is broken again.
This makes no sense to me. Why would an 'author' opening a solution impact the connection manager when ABOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT THE CONNECTION MANAGER WAS CHANGED?!
Seems like a bug to me. Anyone seen something like this?
I have a package that creates a recordset in a variable (Type=Object, Name=CountryTable). The recordset is then picked up in a Script Task and loaded into a table using this code:
Dim adp As New OleDb.OleDbDataAdapter dt = New DataTable
adp.Fill(dt, Dts.Variables("CountryTable").Value)
It was working fine until I turned SaveCheckpoints ON. Now it does not load any rows into the dt table. The dataflow task with the recordset destination ('CountryTable' variable) reports 10 rows in the pipeline. If I turn SaveCheckpoints OFF, it fills the dt table OK. If it cannot fill the dt table because of SaveCheckpoints being ON, shouldn't it give an error message? Thanks.
Hi! Has anyone experienced this problem? Certain queries that work fine in SQL 6.5 and Oracle return inconsistent / inaccurate results in SQL 7 (with SP1). These queries include an IN clause with a range of values. For example, the following query: SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC, columnD FROM table WHERE columnD = 'I' AND columnA IN (1,2,3,11,19) go
returns a different result than this query: SELECT columnA, columnB, columnC, columnD FROM table WHERE columnD = 'I' AND columnA IN (1,3,11,2,19) go
The only way we have stumbled upon to get accurate results consistently is to order the range values from largest to smallest: AND columnA IN (19,11,3,2,1)
Have not seen this documented anywhere. We are in the process of re-ordering these ranges in our code, but I welcome any ideas or comments... Thanks!
I have encountered an anomaly. The dbcc checkident(reseed) command behaves differently on two SQL servers.
In both cases, I am deleting from (not truncating) data in two tables, due to foreign key constraints. (I am truncating other tables, the issue is not with those tables, only with the deleted-from tables.) On one server, I need to use dbcc checkident(reseed,0) so that when I insert fresh data, it begins with identity key #1. According to MS documentation, that appears to be the correct behavior, when data has been deleted from a table, rather than truncated.
However, on the other server, I need to use dbcc checkident(reseed,1); if I use ...(reseed,0) on that server, it begins inserting data with identity key #0.
This is consistent, repeatable behavior on both servers.
We previously having two servers A and B. Server A is used for updation of data and the data then replicated to server B. Server B is used for
Server A : purpose : used for database updation/ modification SQL Server version : SQL Server 2000 SP 2
Server Z : purpose : used for Reporting SQL Server version : SQL Server 2000 SP 2
We were doing Transactional replication from Server A to Server B.
Last month we have broght another server (Server B) with same hardware configuration but having SQL SERVER 2005 installed. This is to speed up our database update process. We have moved some of the database on this new server so that we can achieve our deadlines.
Server B : purpose : used for database updation/ modification SQL Server version : SQL Server 2005
I have set up the transactional replication from Server B to Server Z and replication works fine. However, the issue is after it is started replicating from this new server (Server B) performance of all the queries reduced a lot.(making my life harder)
I didnt expected this as our reporting server is still SQL server 2000. I have restored the backup of database which was replicated from server A (sql server 2000) and compared execution plan for one of our common query (which is used in most of the reports and which is now taking longer time to provide results)
I found that database which is replicated from Server B (Sql server 2005) is having primary keys. which was not present in the database which replicated from server A(Sql server 2000).
I have then removed the primary key and make the indexes same as previous copy of database(which was replicated from server A) But still the query takes long time.
Execution plan now shows "Table Spool" which was not present in previous copy of database.
Almost every query for this database is taking longer time now.
Can someone suggest me what is wrong and what should I need to fix.
I have read that I need to add an instead of trigger. I have no idea how to do this. I am basicaly trying to update at the moment but will also need to insert later. From the code in VWD2008 I only get the error when i include this info here: When i press update and these below are included in the update statement then i get the error. [S_DATE] = @S_DATE, [END[IS_CONFIRMED] = @IS_CONFIRMED, [IS_PAID] = @IS_PAID, [S_Descript] = @S_DESCRIPT[COMPANY] = @COMPANY[MONTH] = @MONTH[ACCOUNT] = @ACCOUNT
Here is view from SQL 2000. CREATE VIEW dbo.VIEW_TRAINING AS SELECT dbo.ADDRESS.EMAIL, dbo.ADDRESS.FIRST_NAME AS [first name], dbo.ADDRESS.LAST_NAME AS [last name], dbo.ADDRESS.STATE, dbo.ADDRESS.TEL1 AS phone, dbo.CUST.NAME AS Company, dbo.ITEMS.DESCRIPT AS S_Descript, dbo.ADDRESS.JOB_TITLE AS Job_Title, dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.[MONTH], dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.S_DATE, dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.END_DATE, dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.IS_CONFIRMED, dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.IS_PAID, dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.CUST_CODE AS Account, dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.SCHEDULE_ID
FROM dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE INNER JOIN dbo.CUST ON dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.CUST_CODE = dbo.CUST.CUST_CODE RIGHT OUTER JOIN dbo.X_INVOIC RIGHT OUTER JOIN dbo.INVOICES ON dbo.X_INVOIC.ORDER_NO = dbo.INVOICES.DOC_NO LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.ADDRESS ON dbo.INVOICES.CUST_CODE = dbo.ADDRESS.CUST_CODE LEFT OUTER JOIN dbo.ITEMS ON dbo.ITEMS.ITEMNO = dbo.X_INVOIC.ITEM_CODE ON dbo.CUST.CUST_CODE = dbo.ADDRESS.CUST_CODE
WHERE (dbo.X_INVOIC.ITEM_CODE LIKE 'FOT-%') AND (dbo.X_INVOIC.STATUS = 7) AND (dbo.ADDRESS.TYPE IN (4, 5, 6)) AND (dbo.ADDRESS.EMAIL <> '') AND (dbo.ADDRESS.COUNTRY = 'UNITED STATES') AND (dbo.ITEMS.CATEGORY = 'TRAININGCLASSES') AND (dbo.TRAINING_SCHEDULE.CUST_CODE = 'steve')
Here is the forms code I am working with: used VWD to generate the forms...I added update...<%@ Page Language="C#" AutoEventWireup="true" CodeFile="training.aspx.cs" Inherits="training" TRACE = TRUE%>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
I have a report where a user selects a AD Global Group. Then I have another parameter that populates with the members of that group. My problem is the userlist parameter isn't populating. If I hard code a Global group name it works, but it isn't getting the Global Group parameter when I use @GlobalGroup.
SELECT sAMAccountName, displayName, distinguishedName FROM 'LDAP://DC=xxx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx' WHERE objectCategory = 'Person' AND objectClass = 'user' AND memberOf = 'CN=@GlobalGroup,OU=Groups,OU=SCSM,OU=Applications,DC=xxxx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=xx,DC=us'
I have a report with two parameters (@StartDate and @EndDate) to enable users to specify values to customize the data in the report. These two parameters are created within the Dataset. The parameter visibility is set to visible.Opening the report directly works as expected (the user is able to input the date parameters as he wishes and then sees only the data of the specified time period, see image1).Now I want to use this report as a subreport (beeing opened from my main report): But when I open the report within the main report (via action go to report) the parameters are not shown anymore, see image2.Why are the parameters not shown anymore?
-- I'm working with Reporting Services in SharePoint mode using Sql Server 2012, SharePoint 2013.
View or function 'MutualFund' is not updatable because the modification affects multiple base tables.
I get the above error when i try to delete rows from a view. i tried the following code with a table. it works perfectly. i want the same behaviour for a view. can anyone help.
Delete MutualFund from MutualFund inner join MutualFund_history on MutualFund.SecurityID= MutualFund_history.SecurityIDwhere MutualFund.MorningstarCategoryID=MutualFund_history.MorningstarCategoryID and MutualFund.MorningstarAssetClassID= MutualFund_history.MorningstarAssetClassID and MutualFund_history.insertdt =(Select MAX(DsegLastUpdated) from Timestamp_History(nolock))
"MutualFund" is a view. if it were a table, the above works well. but how can i simulate the same effect for a view. any help will be greatly appreciated.
I created a SSRS Reports in SQL Server 2012 and deployed in server, I want this report to be accessed by one particular User created in that hosted server and any time if user hits the Report URL it asked for login Prompt.Suppose if I create a Windows User "ReportUser" in report server , I want when user hits the URL he should be able to access the report by providing the 'ReportUser" credentials.
I am working on the security model for an application that will be used by 100s of users with a dedicated SQL 2005 database for this application and access via SQL XML Web Services.
The client has asked to make it "open" during alpha testing such that anyone can access the web services without having to set them up first. Is there a way to do this? The best I can figure is to use mixed mode security and hard code a login and password. Any method using Windows authentication would require that I add every user at a minimum to the database.
In production, all users will have an active directory role specified that determines if they should have access to the web services or not. However, it is my understanding that to use Windows authentication, I would still need to add each individual user at a minimum as a Login to the SQL Server, and under best practices also as database users with permissions granted to the endpoint.
Am I correct in the above, or is there a more efficient way to achieve these results?
I am in a project where we are using a vanillla Reporting Services 2005 with the builtin report portal. No sharepoint integration yet.
We have successful deployments where we limit access to different folders based on AD-accounts and groups. In this particular case I have a folder for which I would like to allow access to all AD-users within the entire company.
So basically I know how to limit access but I don't know how to enable access for everyone. Is there a simple way to do it? I have googled and search mshelp but I couldn't find anything. I will admit to the search being quite quick but as usual time is short.
I have had this issue just pop up. I have local users who can connect fine, but my users that require connection by VPN cannot connect. I get the server not available or access denied error. I did confirm that the VPN'ers are connected to the network correctly and can see that their shares and mappings are correct. Any ideas? Thanking you all in advance!!
I am trying to revert back to Windows 7 after upgrading to Windows 10, however it will not let me and the following message occurs: "Remove new accounts.Before you can go back to a previous version of Windows, you'll need to remove any user accounts you added after the most recent upgrade. The accounts need to be completely removed, including their profiles.You created one account (NT SERVICEMSSQLSERVER) Go to Settings> Accounts> Other users to remove these accounts and then try again".However I did not create any new users and there are no other users listed in the Accounts section.
hi alli've got two tables called "webusers" (id, name, fk_country) and "countries" (id, name) at the meantime, i've a search-page where i can fill a form to search users. in the dropdown to select the country i included an option which is called "all countries". now the problem is: how can i make a stored procedure that makes a restriction to the fk_country depending on the submitted fk_country parameter?it should be something like SELECT * FROM webusers(if @fk_country > 0, which is the value for "all countries"){ WHERE fk_country = @fk_country} who has an idea how to solve this problem?
Hi, I am unsure whether i can delete some system created tables from a database.
I was testing replication and then used the wizard to disable it all. I am however left with three tables that are replication based that have not been deleted. they are : MSreplication_subscriptions MSsubscriptions_agents MSsubscriptions_properties
these tables are causing problems with some third party software due to the length of their names. I have tried to 'Exec sp_rename' but i get an error saying the objects are not valid for this operation.
Can i just delete them or will this cause problems if i want to start up replication in the future?
In query analyser, I can stop a script with the "return" statement butif the script contains multiple batches (separated by GO) then thereturn statement only stops the current batch.Is there a way to stop the whole script?