Hello All,
SQL 2000 does not allow me to create a table variable or UDF. I am sure my syntax is correct but it gives me a syntax error near 'create' or near 'table'. This db was originally ported from SQL 6.5->7.0->2000. Can anyone explain?
Thanks in advance!
It seens that a simple script:Update sysxlogins set name = 'AA001' + substring(name, 9, LEN(name)-8)where name like 'ILLINOIS%'Will replace the SQL2000 domain name correctly in sysxlogins:ILLINOISJonesP becomes AA001JonesPBut for some strange reason via ILLINOISJonesP can still logon viaQueryAnalyzer although he is no longer in the sysxlogins tableanymore? SQL has been stop/started, server even rebooted, yet BOTHthe new and old logins seem to both allow QA login, any thought howthe old one is getting thru SQL security?thanks in advance for any help...
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have sql2000 & sql2005 on the same machine. I am unable to register my localhost in sql2000, get an access denied error. How can I make my localhost use sql2000 database?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi everyone,
I€™m suffering a queer behaviour when I use BIDS. Concretely, when I open a dtsx from my project (it has 10 packages) many times Sequence Container and Data Flow tasks are invisible. I mean, its lines are not visible at all whereas its titles are. I mean, what you see is just a white box€¦
Then, I€™m gonna Data Flow layer and I have to do double-clik over the tasks and are visible but on Control Flow I don€™t see how to solve.
Curiously in our development and production server such behaviour doesn€™t happen (we are accessing by mean Terminal Server from our workstations)
How odd!. Everything is fine except this.
I want to remark you that such project has been copied from the server, this is, these packages are been built on the server
Thanks for your thougts or ideas,
i am in the process of Migrating SQL 2000 to my new SQL2000 server i want to know the what would the best way for me to migrate one SQL server to another SQL server on the same network and rename the new server to the old server and bring it up for use in our ecommerce website.
I have a datasource where i assign the control Parameter value depending on whether theres a value in the querystring or a gridview selectedvalue is indeed selected.When i do this using a querystring it works fine, however, when i do it using gridView_selectedIndexChanged it doesn't work.Here's the code <asp:SqlDataSource ID="jobDetailsDS" runat="server" ConnectionString="<%$ ConnectionStrings:promanConn %>" SelectCommand="SELECT tblJobs.intJobId, tblJobs.intJobStaffId, tblJobs.intJobUserId, tblJobs.intJobCategoryId, tblJobs.strJobTitle, tblJobs.strJobDesc, tblJobs.strJobNotes, tblJobs.dateJobLogged, tblJobs.dateJobDeadline, tblJobs.dateJobCompleted, tblJobs.intJobPriorityId, tblJobs.strJobSolution, tblJobs.boolJobCompleted, tblPriority.priorityName, tblPriority.id, tblPriority.priorityOrder, tblStaff.staffName, tblStaff.id AS staffID, tblProblemCategoriesLookup.strProblemCatName, tblProblemCategoriesLookup.intProblemCatId, tblStaff_1.id AS Expr1, tblStaff_1.staffName AS UserName FROM tblJobs INNER JOIN tblPriority ON tblJobs.intJobPriorityId = tblPriority.id INNER JOIN tblStaff ON tblJobs.intJobStaffId = tblStaff.id INNER JOIN tblProblemCategoriesLookup ON tblJobs.intJobCategoryId = tblProblemCategoriesLookup.intProblemCatId INNER JOIN tblStaff AS tblStaff_1 ON tblJobs.intJobUserId = tblStaff_1.id WHERE (tblJobs.intJobId = @intJobId)" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO tblJobs(intJobStaffId, intJobUserId, intJobCategoryId, strJobTitle, strJobDesc, strJobNotes, dateJobLogged, dateJobDeadline, intJobPriorityId, boolJobCompleted) VALUES (@intJobStaffId, 56 , 39, @strJobTitle, @strJobDesc, @strJobNotes,{ fn NOW() }, { fn NOW() }, @intJobPriorityId, 0); "> <SelectParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="intJobId" Type="int32" /> </SelectParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="intJobStaffId" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="strJobTitle" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="strJobDesc" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="strJobNotes" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="intJobPriorityId" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="intJobUserId" Type="Int32" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:SqlDataSource>Code Behind ElseIf dest > 0 Then jobDetailsDS.SelectParameters.Item("intJobId").DefaultValue = Request.QueryString("dest") notesDS.SelectParameters.Item("intJobId").DefaultValue = Request.QueryString("dest") notesDS.InsertParameters.Item("intJobId").DefaultValue = Request.QueryString("dest") gvActiveJobs.Visible = "False" End If End Sub Protected Sub gvActiveJobs_SelectedIndexChanged(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles gvActiveJobs.SelectedIndexChanged gvActiveJobs.Visible = "False" jobDetailsDS.SelectParameters.Item("intJobId").DefaultValue = gvActiveJobs.SelectedValue notesDS.SelectParameters.Item("intJobId").DefaultValue = gvActiveJobs.SelectedValue notesDS.InsertParameters.Item("intJobId").DefaultValue = gvActiveJobs.SelectedValue End Sub I also debugged and checked the value of gvActiveJobs.SelectedValue and it is what i was expecting but its still no good.Can anyone help?ThanksMatt
View 2 Replies View RelatedI moved a table from one file group to another file group. After moving the table the row count show 0 but when I open the table it’s returning all the rows. Is something wrong with the table? Do I have created a cluster index and drop on the table?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHi,
I have table in my db thats used as a temporary table. At the end of the day it contains thousands of records which get summarized then all are deleted. I recently moved the application over to a new server with pretty much the same hardware config and noticed a big performance hit when running queries on this temp table (455 milliseconds as opposed to 1) In short, the fix was dropping the table and re-creating it.
Anybody know how this could be? I know that even if you delete records from a table, the table still seems to retain its physical size on the hard drive, could this have something to do with it?
Thanks
CREATE TABLE #users(users varchar(50),pasw varchar(50),title varchar(50))
insert into #users select 'test','abcdef','ceo'
SELECT * FROM #users
alter table #users alter column pasw nvarchar(50)
update #users set pasw=pwdencrypt(pasw)
SELECT * FROM #users
What happens to the TITLE column?
I had a table like the above with users and passwords in the Production DB. The password column had VARCHAR type. I changed it to NVARCHAR and encrypted the passwords. When i executed the SELECT *, the title column appeared like this. :eek:
If i query the table by column names instead of * i see the correct values. I couldn't understand what behaviour is it.
Howdy!
Hi Experts,
Am able to restart my local sql server using a login which dont have a sysadmin privileage.This login only have access to a particular database .Its only having datareader and datawriter as DB roles but still am able to restart the server.Please help
TIA
RKNAIR
Hi,I have made a web application using SQL Server 2005
Express with a few admin pages that require login. I used the SQL
Server Managment Studio Express to setup users and groups and it works
fine. But the web server has SQL Server 2000 and all I get is a
user id and password to access the database. It seems I cannot use the
Login control I put on my "login.aspx" page becuase it uses the
integrated authentication which chokes on 2000. I am afraid I wonlt be
able to use some of the 2.0 features such as profiles, ... Is
this the way 2.0 works with SQL Server 2000? Should I ditch the ISP if
they only give me a single access to database with no provisions to
create users. (I was told I had to create a "Users" table and manually
assign ids and passwords and that I can only use the user id and
password they supplied to setup the connection string in the script.)I appreciate your help.
Does anyone know when SP1 will be available for SQL2000??
Thanks,
Steve Bajada
Are there any advantages/disadvantages of running SQL2K on NT4 as opposed to running on WIN2K?
View 1 Replies View Relatedpls tell me abt log shipping in sql2000
I am using c# and ASP.NET 2 and I am getting a very strange error. I
have a field called CompanyID in SQL Server 2005, and it allows null
values in it. When this CompanyID is not NULL, ie for example it is
202, then when i press the update button it allows me to update
perfectly in the database. However if the CompanyID is NULL,
and I try to update the companyID, to lets say 202, the application
just crashes with the following message:- System.InvalidCastException: Object cannot be cast from DBNull to other types. I tried to set some breakpoints in the application to debug, however it does not even pass through these breakpoints! Any ideas on what the problem can be or how I can debug? Thanks for your help and time Johann
This is the actual statement displayed from Response.Write in classic ASP. INSERT INTO WOTasks (WoNum,TaskNum,TaskDesc,TaskMemo,Account,ModifyDate,Estimate,TaskHours,Unit,UnitCost,TotalCost) SELECT '06-012497',TaskNum,TaskDesc,TaskMemo,Account,'2006-Oct-3',1,TaskHours,Unit,UnitCost,TotalCost FROM Tasks WHERE procnum = '000002' There are 4 records returned from the SELECT part of the statement. In some situations, 4 records are inserted to WOTasks table, in others, only 1 record is inserted. I can't find out why 1 record, instead of 4, record is inserted. A form page submits the form to the save page using post method. The above statement is contained in the save page. When one of the form textbox is filled, 1 record is inserted. When the textbox is not filled, 4 records are inserted. You may think the textbox has something to do with the behaviour. I also think so but the content of the textbox does not affect the sql statement. In both cases, the insert statement is the same. In the actual codes, only strings in quotes are variables and the rest are hardcoded. When I run the statement in SQL Server, 4 records are affected. No such problem when connected with Access.The actual code belowSub AddTask(ByVal proc, ByVal wonum) Dim sSQL sSQL = "INSERT INTO WOTasks (WoNum,TaskNum,TaskDesc,TaskMemo,Account,ModifyDate,Estimate,TaskHours,Unit,UnitCost,TotalCost) SELECT '" & wonum & _ "',TaskNum,TaskDesc,TaskMemo,Account,'" & curDate & "',1,TaskHours,Unit,UnitCost,TotalCost FROM Tasks WHERE procnum='" & proc & "'" 'Response.Write sSQL:Response.End conn.Execute sSQL, , 128 End Sub
View 2 Replies View RelatedHi there I have this statement I have written as follows:strCommand = "SELECT * FROM tblstock WHERE Type='"&Statement &"' AND Description like'"&criteria &"%' OR Tag like'"&criteria &"%'OR Location like'"&criteria &"%' OR LAN like'"&criteria &"%' OR RAM like'"&criteria &"%' OR CD like'"&criteria &"%' OR OS like '" &criteria &"%' OR SN like'" &criteria &"%' OR DeviceStatus like'" &criteria &"%' ORDER BY " &sSortStr The variable "Statement" is passed into the sub as "PC" which means only records of type "PC" should be displayed along with any other criteria. The issue I'm having is that when I specify criteria I'm also recieving other types eg "Cameras" if they contain any of my criteria.. I can't understand how because in the statement I tell it only to display records of type "PC".. Anybody know what I'm doing wrong? Thanks
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've done a new tabel that insert the UserId that in a uniqueidentifier get from Membership.GetUser().ProviderUserKeySo if I want to make a select statement threw storedprocedure in codebehind it runs as it shouldCode behindDim GetCustomersCars As CustomerCarByUserId = New CustomerCarByUserId MyCars.DataSource = GetCustomersCars.CarByUserId(Membership.GetUser().ProviderUserKey)MyCars.DataBind() But in when I use ObjectDataSource it fails<asp:ObjectDataSource id="ObjectDataSource1" runat="server" selectmethod="CarByUserId" typename="CustomerCarByUserId"> <SelectParameters> <asp:Parameter defaultvalue="Membership.GetUser().ProviderUserKey" name="UserId" type="Object" /> </SelectParameters> </asp:ObjectDataSource>I've tried with Membership.GetUser().ProviderUserKey.ToString(), but that doesnt work. Error message:InvalidCastExceptionI connect to the same source in both cases.Any one with an Idee ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSo we currently are running a SQL 7 Server, which hopefully we will be updating this year but untill then we're stuck. I've got a web app using ASP.NET 2.0 and on occasion I get this error:
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: An error has occurred while establishing a connection to the server. When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections. (provider: TCP Provider, error: 0 - Only one usage of each socket address (protocol/network address/port) is normally permitted.) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnection.OnError(SqlException exception, Boolean breakConnection) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.ThrowExceptionAndWarning(TdsParserStateObject stateObj) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.Connect(Boolean& useFailoverPartner, Boolean& failoverDemandDone, String host, String failoverPartner, String protocol, SqlInternalConnectionTds connHandler, Int64 timerExpire, Boolean encrypt, Boolean trustServerCert, Boolean integratedSecurity, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean aliasLookup) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds.OpenLoginEnlist(SqlConnection owningObject, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, String newPassword, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlInternalConnectionTds..ctor(DbConnectionPoolIdentity identity, SqlConnectionString connectionOptions, Object providerInfo, String newPassword, SqlConnection owningObject, Boolean redirectedUserInstance) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnectionFactory.CreateConnection(DbConnectionOptions options, Object poolGroupProviderInfo, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnection owningConnection) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.CreatePooledConnection(DbConnection owningConnection, DbConnectionPool pool, DbConnectionOptions options) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.CreateObject(DbConnection owningObject) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.UserCreateRequest(DbConnection owningObject) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionPool.GetConnection(DbConnection owningObject) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionFactory.GetConnection(DbConnection owningConnection) at System.Data.ProviderBase.DbConnectionClosed.OpenConnection(DbConnection outerConnection, DbConnectionFactory connectionFactory) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlConnection.Open()
I Some sql that it keeps throwing the following error
SqlDumpExceptionHandler: Process 52 generated fatal exception c0000005 EXCEPTION_ACCESS_VIOLATION. SQL Server is terminating this process.
Here is the sql
UPDATE dbo.temptable
SET code = 'MM'
FROM dbo.temptable T
JOIN dbo.Item I WITH (NOLOCK)
ON T.ProductID = P.ProductID
JOIN dbo.cars C WITH (NOLOCK) ON I.ModelID = C.ModelID
JOIN dbo.carmakes CM WITH (NOLOCK) ON CM.MakeID = C.MakeID
JOIN dbo.CarDealerMakes CDM WITH (NOLOCK)
ON CM.MakeID = CDM.MakeID
WHERE T.ProductID NOT IN (
SELECT distinct A.ProductID
FROM dbo.Action A WITH (NOLOCK)
JOIN dbo.ActionPurchases AP WITH (NOLOCK)
ON A.ActionID = AP.ActionID
WHERE A.CustomerID = 2
UNION
SELECT distinct A.ProductID
FROM dbo.Action A WITH (NOLOCK)
JOIN dbo.ActionServices S WITH (NOLOCK)
ON A.ActionID = S.ActionID
WHERE 2 = A.ProductID)
That sql will run on windows 2000 but it will not run on windows 2003.
I have the latest service pack.
Has anyone ever come across this before or have and suggestions ?
I have a query as follow:
SELECT @resRate = (SELECT resRate FROM ProjectAssign WHERE proNo = (SELECT projNo FROM Timer_Cust WHERE refNum = @actProjNo AND username= (SELECT username FROM Timer_Emp WHERE refNum = @actEmployee) ) )
the definition of table Timer_cust contains refNum(int), projNo(varchar) and projName(varchar).Timer_cust table doesn't contain column username. So this query shoud generate a runtime error. however it works fine without error.But if I run SELECT projNo FROM Timer_Cust WHERE refNum = @actProjNo AND username= (SELECT username FROM Timer_Emp WHERE refNum = @actEmployee)A runtime error message appears.Why?
Can any one tell me why sp_helpindex shows several indexes though there is only one index on the table. When i use Enterprise manager it shows only one index..Any idea..is it a bug ..do I need to apply latest service pack ?
Here is the output shows
IX_tbl_ncf_bo
_WA_Sys_Deal_No_2902ECC1
_WA_Sys_fwddate_2902ECC1
_WA_Sys_deal_type_2902ECC1
_WA_Sys_RegionID_2902ECC1
_WA_Sys_CompID_2902ECC1
_WA_Sys_To_Include_2902ECC1
_WA_Sys_SvcChoice_2902ECC1
_WA_Sys_UtilityID_2902ECC1
First one is actual index that I created, remaining
i have four separate jobs which run at scheduled time daily..out of which one job has run properly and the other three have not run at all(there is no details of it in "View job history")for only one day in between..again from the next day all the four jobs are running properly.what could be the reason for the three jobs not running on a particular day?(The jobs were scheduled between 3 and 4am in the morning..so nobody would be using the system at that time and the system was definitely up at that time as that one job has run)
i could afford to have such strange behaviour in future as the jobs are important and should run daily.any ideas by which i could make sure all four jobs run daily?
We've been finding some strange indexes in our SQL 7 database. They are not indexes we put in, but seem to be system generated. They always have the format "hind_" and then a series of numbers and underscores. Most of the time they replicate indexes we already had in place. The strangest part is that in some cases they seem to be generating multiple clustered indexes on the same table. A previous question recieved an answer saying that they were statistical indexes. Could someone shed a little more light on what these are, where they came from, and how I can prevent them from coming back? Our queries usually take much longer on tables with these "rogue" indexes on them. Thanks.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhy is it so?
select len("Test")
--returns 4
select len("Test ")
--returns 4
select len(" Test ")
--returns 7
why not all 4 ?
why not 4,11,14?
I have a SP that usually works fine (0-16 CPU time, 40 ms Duration), but from time to time the server hangs with apparently no reason. The SP has a lock timeout set to 500, so it should abort if a lock timeout error (1222) occurs but it doesn't. The Profiler reports very long execution time (over 30 sec), and because of that all other SP calls are blocked, 'cause the transaction opened by the first sp execution is not finished yet.
Any other attempts to identify other blocking queries did not show me anything suspect (sp_lock, dbcc opentran) other then the usual blocked chain. I'm starting to think about an IO bottleneck, or IO failure, that could block the disk access and cause the delay. The status of RAID 5 is healthy.
The server is used as storage system for a website (approx. 2000 concurrent users), and occasionally I noticed an ASP queue, but this strange behavior occurs even during the peak-off hours.
Any thoughts ?
-----
HP Server - 2 CPU @ 3,4 ; 4 GB RAM; SCSI - RAID 5
Windows 2000 Advanced Server - SQL Server 2000 SP4
I have a table. It shows "Rows: 2" when I open it in the table properties dialog. But there is no record in the table when I open it from Open Table -> Return All Rows.
I don't understand how this can happen. Any help is appreciated.
Thanks.
Hello
I have one PC with SQL server 2000 and I am working on one database called TaxReg but today I found it gray and (suspect) beside it
could you please tell what is the problem and how to fix it ?
...the Access forum...so many bad practices
Like this one
http://www.dbforums.com/showthread.php?p=6284279&posted=1#post6284279
I received some strange results after typing the wrong column in a subselect using IN. I've been puzzling over it a while now and can't quite figure out why it is doing what it is.
Here's an example of what is happening.
use northwind
go
select * from Customers where CustomerID in
( select CustomerID from Employees where 1 = 0 )
Now, there is no customerid on the Employees table, so running the subquery alone will produce an error. However when the full query above is run, all rows in the customer table are returned.
It was my understanding that the inner querry is evaluated first, and the results used by the outer query. I'm having a hard time seeing how this query is going anywhere.
Any ideas?
I have a simple query which ran fine for the last 12 months. All of sudden, it's dragging and couldn't finish in 6 hours. I tried to trace down where the problem resided but it's such a simple query there is nothing to break down. By chance, I commented out all the column names and replace with ' SELECT * ', the query finished in 14 seconds. Once I replace the * with column names, it ran over 20 minutes and I had to cancel it because it doesn't seem to be returning any results. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
View 11 Replies View RelatedHi,
When I use only 2 dimensions linked with my fact and process the cube, I get the correct results for my measure (I have checked this will all
possible combinations of the 2 dimensions)....
However when I add more dimensions, link them with the fact, process the cube, and check the same results I get totally different totals for my
measure :confused:
I realize that ideally I should post the DDLs for all dimensions etc.
but to start with can anyone think of what could be causing this.
I'll appreciate your help.
Thanks.
P.S
Exhausted :(
NO MIRACLES !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
(see point number 8 in Brett's list)