T-SQL (SS2K8) :: How Does Transaction Rollback Across Multiple Database
Oct 16, 2014
I have a wrapper stored procedure ProcMain_wrapper that executes in one main dataabase and it calls child stored procedure in multiple databases. Does the rollback occur in all the databases if the stored procedure fails in any one of the multiple databases?
create procedure dbo.db_Main.ProcMain_wrapper (
declare @curClientCode as cursor ,@db varchar(10),@dbName varchar(20)
BEGIN TRANSACTION TRAN1
BEGIN TRY
SET @curClientCode = CURSOR FOR
SELECT [name] from sys.databases where name like 'dbclient_%'
[code]....
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jul 10, 2007
Hi everyone,
I am reading about the Rollback transaction but I'm not sure if it's the feature I need.
My application is going to update a few tables, but my programmer said that it will be done using more than 1 transaction.
For example, if I want to create a new employer with all the detailed informations, tables will be filled when the user complete the insertion of a part of data. If he decides to abort the operation, i'd like to delete all the values inserted before with the other queries. Is it possible to create a "savepoint" and roll back all transactions processed from this savepoint?
thank you!
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2008
Hello,
I have a stored procedure that updates my table with values entered in a datatable in my windows app.
An error occurs 1/2 way through the update process. I assumed that by implementing the rollback transaction command that the inserted lines would not be saved to my db. This is not the case.
I will elaborate a little more on what I need. From my windows app I have a datatable with 100 new rows that need to be written to my db. This I can do. However, a problem crops up should there be an error during the transfer. Let's say I have 100 rows in my datatable in my windows app, and row 57 causes an error, what is happening is that rows 1-56 are committed and 57-100 are not. What I need is for 1-100 to NOT be committed to my DB should there be a snag along the way. I need a code sample as I'm having way too much difficulty with this as is.
The basic code that copies to my db(sans rollback):
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON
INSERT INTO userprofile (uid, uname, ustatus)
VALUES @userid, @username, @userstatus;
END
Thank You.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2014
I have two tables called ECASE and PROJECT
In the ECASE table there is trigger to get the max value of case_id column in ecase based on project and increment one to that case_id value and insert into ecase table .
When we insert a new record to the ECASE table this trigger calls and insert the case_id column value.
When i run with multiple threads , the transaction is rolled back because of trigger . The reason is , on the project table the lock is happening while getting the max value of case_id column based on project.
I need to prevent the deadlock .
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 8, 2000
Hi,
We have an order posting stored procedure that's been executing for 14 hours now. This procedure has simple update statements but all the tables updated have triggers which update other tables with triggers and so on.
This procedure hasn't commited yet. I have a full database backup from last night and transaction log backup from this morning while it was running. I want to kill this job and restore database from last backup. Only thing I am afraid of is that it will take too long to roll back which I have no estimate of time. Is there any faster way to get rid of all the uncommited transactions? Has anybody rolled back such a massive transaction? Any idea on how long it can take? Can it affect the overall server performance as this is the main production ERP server.
I can see in profiler that this procedure is still running and not hung.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2006
I'm receiving the below error when trying to implement Execute SQL Task.
"The ROLLBACK TRANSACTION request has no corresponding BEGIN TRANSACTION." This error also happens on COMMIT as well and there is a preceding Execute SQL Task with BEGIN TRANSACTION tranname WITH MARK 'tran'
I know I can change the transaction option property from "supported" to "required" however I want to mark the transaction. I was copying the way Import/Export Wizard does it however I'm unable to figure out why it works and why mine doesn't work.
Anyone know of the reason?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2003
Hi!
I just made a transaction which writes and reads some data from a database as one unit. Now, I would like to know, what happens, if this transaction does not commit, but instead performs a rollback? Should I use a boolean loop which keeps on trying the transaction until it commits or is there an alternative? I would appreciate any suggestions or help!
Thanks!
Timothy
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2007
How do I find out the transaction name to rollback. Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2008
Hi all
I received the following message in the application log files while the QA team is tesing the application.
06:40:31 [ERROR ] com.inet.tds.ao: The connection is closed: there was an error on the database could not rollback the transaction
I checked at the SQL server logs and found any thing odd.
what does the above error indicates..
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2007
Hi all,
How to work rollback transaction in sql server.
Thanks&Regards
msrs
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
If someone could help me with this I will be in debt to you!I am a .net developer who is working on a system that has a sql server2000 backend. On the weekends, I work from home and I have MSDE on mylaptop. This morning I went to update the main SQL server as I addedsome new views .. however I managed to import the data too!!Therefore I have overwritten my local data to the main sql serverdatabase, which has ressulted in loss of loads of work!Can I rollback to the version before I exported my data from MSDE to themain SQL server. I did the export by using enterprise manager and rightclicking on the table on my local msde and then sending it to the realsql server!Please please please help??*** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com ***Don't just participate in USENET...get rewarded for it!
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2007
i have a froeach loop,in which i have data flow task,which i need to rollback if any other task fails..
here i need to accept multiple files and i have to give a one second pause for between each file for this i have used a dummy for loop,as i am using this for loop i cant give the for each loop property Transaction Option as required...but i need to rollback if any task fails...i have a screen shot of the for each loop
please give me some ideas on this.
Thanks in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 10, 2006
Hi everyone,
In the following T-SQL code snippet,when I attempt to insert more than one record I encounter an error because of the following trigger but I have some doubts about the performation of ROLLBACK TRANSACTION in here. So there is only one transaction occured in the specified table that contain both trigger and the specified table however I supposed that when we call ROLLBACK TRANSACTION, the transaction is aborted. But the code run the Raiserror statement which is located in after the ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement. So why do this code( Raiserror) is run ? Should not it be terminated because of the ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement ??
ALTER TRIGGER kimlikNo_Degistir
ON Bilgi FOR INSERT
AS
IF(SELECT COUNT(*) FROM Inserted) > 1
BEGIN
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
RAISERROR('You are not allowed to enter more than one record',12,1)
END
ELSE
BEGIN
UPDATE M SET M.KimlikNo = B.Kimlk + M.KimlikNo FROM Muhasebe as M INNER JOIN Inserted AS B ON M.Ad = B.Ad
END
Thanks
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2007
I made a mistake and ran a delete query that I should not have. There have been no other transactions/modifcations to the database since my delete query.
Can I roll this back from the log file?
Please help as soon as you can!
THANKS!!
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 6, 2006
With the function below, I receive this error:Error:Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 0.Function:Public Shared Function DeleteMesssages(ByVal UserID As String, ByVal MessageIDs As List(Of String)) As Boolean Dim bSuccess As Boolean Dim MyConnection As SqlConnection = GetConnection() Dim cmd As New SqlCommand("", MyConnection) Dim i As Integer Dim fBeginTransCalled As Boolean = False
'messagetype 1 =internal messages Try ' ' Start transaction ' MyConnection.Open() cmd.CommandText = "BEGIN TRANSACTION" cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() fBeginTransCalled = True Dim obj As Object For i = 0 To MessageIDs.Count - 1 bSuccess = False 'delete userid-message reference cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM tblUsersAndMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID AND UserID=@UserID" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@UserID", UserID)) cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() 'then delete the message itself if no other user has a reference cmd.CommandText = "SELECT COUNT(*) FROM tblUsersAndMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID1" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID1", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) obj = cmd.ExecuteScalar If ((Not (obj) Is Nothing) _ AndAlso ((TypeOf (obj) Is Integer) _ AndAlso (CType(obj, Integer) > 0))) Then 'more references exist so do not delete message Else 'this is the only reference to the message so delete it permanently cmd.CommandText = "DELETE FROM tblMessages WHERE MessageID=@MessageID2" cmd.Parameters.Add(New SqlParameter("@MessageID2", MessageIDs(i).ToString)) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() End If Next i
' ' End transaction ' cmd.CommandText = "COMMIT TRANSACTION" cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() bSuccess = True fBeginTransCalled = False Catch ex As Exception 'LOG ERROR GlobalFunctions.ReportError("MessageDAL:DeleteMessages", ex.Message) Finally If fBeginTransCalled Then Try cmd = New SqlCommand("ROLLBACK TRANSACTION", MyConnection) cmd.ExecuteNonQuery() Catch e As System.Exception End Try End If MyConnection.Close() End Try Return bSuccess End Function
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2006
I am moving some code that was created in visual studio 2002 into Visual Web Developer 2005 express edition and am getting a warning on some of my code before compilation.
The warning is "Variable lSqlTransaction is used before it has been assigned a value. A null reference exception could result at runtime". I experienced no problems in vs2002.
The offending line is the rollback command within the exception. If I move it out of the exception it no longer flags the warning, if I move it after the throw statement it now longer flags the warning. Any help appreciated.
Heres the code
Public Shared Sub ExecuteNonQuery(ByVal lSQLCommand As SqlCommand)
Dim lSQLConnection As New SqlConnection(SQLConnString(enmSQLDB.enmSQLDB_TPSDB))
Dim lSQLTransaction As SqlTransaction
Try
'-----------------------------------------------------
'Try and open the database
'-----------------------------------------------------
lSQLConnection.Open()
'-----------------------------------------------------
'Create a transaction
'-----------------------------------------------------
lSQLTransaction = lSQLConnection.BeginTransaction
'-----------------------------------------------------
'Assign the connection and transaction to our object
'-----------------------------------------------------
lSQLCommand.Connection = lSQLConnection
lSQLCommand.Transaction = lSQLTransaction
'-----------------------------------------------------
'Execute the stored proc
'-----------------------------------------------------
lSQLCommand.ExecuteNonQuery()
'-----------------------------------------------------
'Use the transaction to commit the changes
'-----------------------------------------------------
lSQLTransaction.Commit()
Catch ex As Exception
'-----------------------------------------------------
'If any errors have been thrown then roll back without
'commiting....
'-----------------------------------------------------
lSQLTransaction.Rollback()
Throw New Exception("An error has occured whilst trying to update the database. " & _
"Your changes have not been saved.", ex)
Finally
If lSQLConnection.State = ConnectionState.Open Then
lSQLConnection.Close()
End If
End Try
End Sub
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 1998
DECLARE @A INT, @B INT,@C INT
SELECT @A=2,@B=3
SELECT @C=@A*@B
SELECT @C
BEGIN TRANSACTION A
SELECT @A
SELECT @B
SELECT @C
END TRANSACTION A
THIS CODE PROCDUE the following errors
Msg 156, Level 15, State 1
Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'END'.
Can anyone help me telling me what I am doing wrong ?
thanks
Ali
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
In VB 6, using ADO, SQL Server 2000In my VB program I use the connection object (abc)to begin a transaction.abc.BeginTransI then, in my VB App, using ADO, execute multiple stored proceduresinserting records into temp tables ##Meetings,reading them, and then finnaly executing (from my VB appusing ADO) as stored procedure that inserts recordsinto a non-temp table.I then have a abc.CommitTransWhat if my VB program crashes before thecommittrans is executed, I assume that the transactionis rolled back, even though no explicit rollbackis issued, because my VB program has crashed.Thank You for your help,Laurence NuttallProgrammer Analyst IIIUCLA - Division of Continuing Education
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2006
Hi
We are loading data from one extract file in to 4 different database tables. When we are loading if the first table gets loaded without any issues and the second table loading gives any issues, we need to rollback the data loaded in to the first table also.
In the package for achieving this, we are using Sequence container. In the sequency container we are having 4 different tasks for loading data to 4 different tables from the same extract file. We also tried setting the different transaction options given in the properties box of the packages, container and tasks.
Also we tried the properties by setting as mentioned in the Test# 7 and 8 in the following URL
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/jthomson/transactionsinsqlserver2005integrationservices.asp
Could you please explain what properties we need to give.
Thanks
Kumaran
View 8 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2007
Hello ,
I have a Dataflow where I insert data from SQL to Oracle and SQL Connection needs to have RetainSameConnection = TRUE. I have Oracle Services for Microsoft Transaction Server installed and I can rollback the transaction only if SQL Connection has RetainSameConnection = FALSE and TransactionOption = Required. Is there any possibility to rollback the Oracle transaction with having SQL RetainSameConnection = TRUE and TransactionOption = Supported?
Thanks.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 19, 2004
Hi,
i would like to know how to determine a transaction is already rollback so that we dont have to reroll back again and get an exception like below:
This SqlTransaction has completed;
it is no longer usable. at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlTransaction.Rollback()
Please help because when i tried to do this: objTrans.rollback() and i got the above exception.
Regards,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2006
When I write code for a multiple statements transaction do I need to check 'if @@ERROR > 0 ' after each SELECT, INSERT, DELETE or UPDATE statement so that the 'rollback tran' statement can be given, or SQL server will automatically rollback the transaction and we don't need to check for @ERROR > 0 ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 8, 2006
Hi,I have a problem. When my computer loses connection toserver during transaction it is rolled back automaticlyby server after 2-5 minutes. During the time a can resetmy computer, run my program again and I can seedata from not commited transaction becouse I have toset isolation level to read uncommited.How to force the server immediately rollback transaction?TIAclint
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2007
We have a locked table and all I need is a way to show all open trans, so I can roll teh offender back
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2007
Hi all, I have a program that needs to delete records, then re-insert new records to a table. But I need to rollback the transaction IF the insert is not success (error occured). The delete and insert are in 2 difference stored procedure (which have rollback transaction) that calling from 1 stored procedure. My problem is that if Insert is not successful, but the records already deleted previously. How can we rollback the delete transaction when insert is not successful?
Note: if possible, I don't want to delete the records AFTER the insert is successful, or create a temp table to stored the deleted records
=======================================
create stored procedure combine_sp
as
begin
call delete_sp -- have rollback transaction in the delete_sp
-- what to do if following has error occured, but we already deleted the records above?
call insert_sp -- have rollback transaction in the insert_sp
end
go
=======================================
Thanks a lot.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 15, 2008
I have a transaction that calls one other sproc and also executes another set of queries, but for some reason I'm getting error 266: "Msg 266, Level 16, State 2, Procedure AddUserHaveTag, Line 26. Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 0, current count = 1."There is NO transaction in the sproc AddTag. It is also included below.Here is the sproc with the transaction:1 set ANSI_NULLS ON2 set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
3 go4
5 ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[AddUserHaveTag] 6 (7 @UserHaveID int,8 @Tag varchar(24),9 @UserHaveTagExists bit OUTPUT
10 )11 AS12 SET NOCOUNT OFF13 DECLARE @ErrorCode int14 DECLARE @TagID int15 DECLARE @TagExists bit16
17 BEGIN TRAN
18 19 -- Call proc to add tag to Tags table
20 EXEC AddTag @Tag, @TagID OUTPUT, @TagExists OUTPUT
21
22 -- Check for errors
23 IF @ErrorCode <> 0 GOTO ERROR24
25 -- Check for existing record, otherwise insert
26 IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM UserHaveTags WHERE UserHaveID = @UserHaveID AND TagID = @TagID)27 BEGIN28 SET @UserHaveTagExists = 129 RETURN 030 END31 ELSE32 BEGIN33 INSERT INTO UserHaveTags (UserHaveID, TagID) VALUES (@UserHaveID, @TagID)34 SET @UserHaveTagExists = 035 END
36
37 -- Check for errors
38 IF @ErrorCode <> 0 GOTO ERROR39
40 COMMIT TRAN
41
42 ERROR:43 IF (@ErrorCode <> 0)44 BEGIN45 PRINT 'Unexpected error occurred!'
46 ROLLBACK TRAN47 END
Here is the AddTag sproc:1 set ANSI_NULLS ON2 set QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
3 go4
5 ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[AddTag] 6 (7 @Tag varchar(24),8 @TagID int OUTPUT,9 @TagExists bit OUTPUT
10 )11 AS12 SET NOCOUNT OFF13 14 IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM Tags WHERE Tag = @Tag)15 BEGIN16 SELECT @TagID = TagID FROM Tags WHERE Tag = @Tag17 SET @TagExists = 118 RETURN 019 END20 ELSE21 BEGIN22 INSERT INTO Tags (Tag) VALUES (@Tag)23 SET @TagID = SCOPE_IDENTITY()24 SET @TagExists = 025 ENDAny advice?Also if you see any glaring errors or things I could be doing better, I'm open to suggestions. I'm fairly new to sprocs and transactions. Thanks,Travis
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2007
I am working on reformating, cleaning, adding derived elements, etc... on data with no data validity checks on the front-end, source data. Its an incremental process where each month I add new data to the prior months' history. Sometimes the new monthly source data "surprises" me -- different values, different data definitons, etc. than expected.
I deal with these surprises by accumulating the fields/values that are unexpected after converting them to varchar with some explanatory language into a table [program_newdataprobs]
If there are any records in [program_newdataproblem] I rollback the transactions so the prior months' history remains unaltered. The problem is I then "lose" the contents of [program_newdataproblem] which I would like to hand to the source data people to troubleshoot.
I have tried the following:
Begin Transaction tran1
.... code that reformats data here
if (select count(*) from program_newdataproblem)>0
BEGIN
Begin Transaction tran2
select * into #t1 from program_newdataproblem
Commit Transaction tran2
Rollback Transaction tran1
insert into program_newdataproblem
Select * from #t1
END
This bombs because because #t1 no longer exits
Any way I can "keep" the data from program_newdataproblem when I Rollback the other transactions? (without having to store the history in separate tables that I can then access if new data errors occur)
Thanks,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2007
Hi,
I am having a application in which from the front end i am saving details of three different things
i.Enquiry Details
ii.Parts Details
iii.Machine details
i am saving the Enquiry detail in a data table,Parts Details in a data table and machine detail in a data table and finally i am adding the three data tables into a single data set and passing the data set to data access layer there i have three insert command one for each data table in my case the enquiry data table will be saved first and then the next two details will be saved and i am saving the details in three different tables in the database, my problem is some times the enquiry details will save to the database and while saving the Parts details there may be some exception and i will throw an exception in that case the enquiry details will be saved and the remaining two details are not saved(Which are also part of the same Transaction).I wanted to know about how to call the transaction function in case of Data Access Layer.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2007
I have a asp.net 2.0 web application. In one of the modules I have following scenario. In the UI there are 3 pages to take the input from the user. On the 1st page, we are inserting data in the master table and with the same we are beginning new sql transaction with the isolation level READ UNCOMMITTED. so that uncommited master table data can be read. Master table has also has 4 detail tables. Then the user is navigated to 2nd and then to 3rd page where the user can enter multiple records in the detail tables. And only after finishing on the 3rd page, the transaction is commited.
I want to ask that is it the right way of doing this kind of functionality?
And is there any other way of doing this?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2008
I have over 500 transaction records in a single DB process handling within SQL transaction (Begin, Commit, RollBack and End).
Is there any limitation for the following rollbacktransaction function to handle more records (eg. over 500 records)? Public Shared Sub RollBackTransaction()
Dim transactionObj As Object
Try
transactionObj = SqlTransaction.GetExistingTransaction
If (Not IsNothing(transactionObj)) Then
CType(transactionObj, SqlTransaction).RollBack()
End If
Catch ex As Exception
Throw New Exception(ex.Message)
End Try
End Sub
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2014
create proc proc1 (@param1 int)
as
begin try
declare @param2 int
begin transaction
exec proc2 @param2
commit transaction
end try
begin catch
if @@trancount > 0
rollback transaction
end catch
i haven't had an opportunity to do this before. I have nested stored proc and both inserts values into different tables. To maintain atomicity i want to be able to rollback everything if an error occurs in the inner or outer stored procedure.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2007
Hello:
I am implimenting the creation of sequence numbers .I use an insert proc on a table that generates the numbers using an identity field:
procedure usp_createidentity
begin transaction
insert into [tblOrderNumber] with default values
rollback ' done so no records in this table
select @OrderNumber = scope_identity()
I call this from another proc that inserts values into my order table:
procedure usp_Insert @OrderNumber int
as
SET XACT_ABORT ON;
BEGIN TRY
BEGIN TRANSACTION
EXEC usp_GetNewOrderNumber @OrderNumber = @OrderNumber output
INSERT INTO [dbo].[tblOrder] ([OrderNumber]) values (@orderNumber) ' inserts value from other stored proc
COMMIT TRANSACTION
END TRY
BEGIN CATCH
if (XACT_STATE() = -1)
ROLLBACK TRANSACTION
else
if (XACT_STATE() = 1)
COMMIT TRANSACTION
END CATCH
Here is the problem. When I run usp_Insert I get the following: Error 266 Transaction count after EXECUTE indicates that a COMMIT or ROLLBACK TRANSACTION statement is missing. Previous count = 1, current count = 0.
This refers to the usp_GetNewOrderNumber that is called inside the other proc as shown above.
The problem does not happen if I put each statement in usp_Insert in its own try/catch. transaction statements.
Maybe it has something to do with the rollback call in the usp_getneworder.
What do I need to do to get rid of this. problem and still run these within one try/catch trans statement set.
Thanks
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2007
I'm able to connect to the Oracle database to insert the data into multiple tables using OLEDB connection via Oracle Provider for OLEDB. However, i wish to create a transaction so that i'm able to rollback all the data in the case where the insertion fails in one of the table. May i know where should i start from?
View 4 Replies
View Related
