T-SQL (SS2K8) :: Joining Where Values Do Not Equal One Another
Apr 23, 2014
I have two select statements; one for open purchase orders, one for open customer orders. I would like to be able to combine the query based on i.item in the top statement joined with c.item from the bottom statement. The i.item is related to a specific c.item, but they do not have the same values. In this case I want to join based on.
p.item=i.item where
1001099548=1001099550
84162359=84198545
84532300=84532293
47547523=47547951
305545A3=87433653
87444977=87444975
left side coming from p.item = right side coming from c.item.
Here are my statements.
--#1 OPEN PO's
SELECT p.item
,(p.qty_ordered-p.qty_received) as POQtyRemaining
,i.item
,i.qty_on_hand
,p.po_num
What I need to do is get all of the records from T2 that don't match EXACTLY to a record in T1. So I figured a LEFT OUTER JOIN should work:
SELECTT2.* FROMT2 LEFT OUTER JOIN T1 ONT2.C1 = T1.C1 ANDT2.C2 = T1.C2 ANDT2.C3 = T1.C3 WHERET1.C1 IS NULL
But this statement returns the DENISE record when I do this (which has an EXACT match). So, my thoughts took me to the NULL values in T1.C2 and T2.C2 for this record and I thought that, perhaps, the NULL values aren't being recognized as being equal (as they are UNKNOWN). So I started digging around and found SET ANSI_NULLS OFF. I tried it but with no luck. Can you offer any insight on this one? What can I do to have NULL values recognized as being equal?
This is the result set that I would like to have returned in this example:
The below stored procedure is used to create a vertical benchmark line on the X-Axis which has a hour scale. I use the stored procedure to find out which temperature crosses or equals the threshold temperature (340), then plot the vertical benchmark line at the hour the first temperature is equal to or greater than 340 degrees and less than 1000 degrees.
The logic below works if the temperature is equal to or greater than 340 degrees and less than 1000 degrees. THE ISSUE is I have 8 temperatures if they don't cross the threshold of 340 degrees I need to set a default value for my vertical line. In other words if the temperature is 180 and my threshold is 340 then set my vertical line on the highest temperature close to 340.
I tried removing my Where clause (but then it breaks the logic for those temperatures that are equal to or greater than 340). I tried using Case When but this didn't give me what I want either. I tried UNION as well. All giving me results I don't want.
Here is what I am looking for:
This first example is one where there was a temperature that was equal to or greater than the threshold of 340 degrees. This is CORRECT
If 8 temperatures did not equal or cross the threshold then give me the hour of the highest temperature close to the threshold but do not return 0.
For Example:
temp1 92 temp2 108 temp3 0 temp4 284 <<< this is the closest to the threshold so give me the hour when this occurred. temp5 2192 *Remember I can only count temperatures less than 1000 degrees. Anything above 1000 degrees mean there is nothing in the oven. So it is false/positive. temp6 102 temp7 0 temp8 12
Code: CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[AgeScoreCardThreshold_JJ_12232013] -- Add the parameters for the stored procedure here @LicenseNumber int = NULL, @Lot varchar(50) = NULL
I have a report that I am running in visual studio 2010, that gets its data from a few different stored procedures in a SQL 2012 Database. The variables are Date and Office Code. We currently have 6 different office codes. One of the Stored Procedures gets call information for each office. With the report we can select any single office or any combination of offices to compile data.
The problem I have is two of these share phone information, so when you select either one or both of them the same data gets returned. So for example we have office codes of AAAAA, BBBBB, CCCCC, DDDDD, EEEEE, and FFFFF. Now AAAAA, and BBBBB share phone information so if you select office code AAAAA, the phone info that is returned is for AAAAA, and BBBBB, and visa versa. So I am not sure how to accomplish that either in the report or in the stored procedure.
I'm trying to update a value into a table a sum. The two tables have ID values. These ID values appear once in Table1 and multiple times in Table2. I'm currently trying to sum up the values in Table2 where the IDs are equal to Table1 and then update the value:
UPDATE [Table1] SET [Total] = (SELECT SUM([Table2].[QTY]) FROM [Table2], [Table1] WHERE [Table1].[ID] = [Table2].[ID] GROUP BY [Table1].[ID]) FROM [Table1], [Table2] WHERE [Table1].[ID] = [Table2].[ID]
Im doing a report on total sales, however my statement below will return values that are equal to both fields ONLY.For example I want to do a query using two text boxes 'from' and 'to 'and count the total sales between the product dates 'Veh_Tyres_Date' and Veh_Parts_Date and 'Veh_Tyres Price' and Veh_ Parts Price'. however it works but if for example I do a search for 01/05/2015 from 31/05/2015 it will not return anything if the second field doesnt contain a sales date between that period.
SELECT tblVehicles.Veh_Parts, tblVehicles.Veh_Parts_Date, tblVehicles.Veh_Tyres, tblVehicles.Veh_Tyres_Date FROM tblVehicles WHERE (((tblVehicles.Veh_Parts_Date) Between [Enter From Date] And [Enter To]) AND ((tblVehicles.Veh_Tyres_Date) Between [Enter From Date] And [Enter To]));
I am having trouble with joining 3 tables.1 table is the primary call it jobs, second is material, third is called labor...job will have all jobs, SOMETIMES the job will have material, sometimes job will have ONLY labor, BUT most of the time it will have job, material and labor...
I've having difficulty joining two tables and getting the results I want. What I'm trying to accomplish is an Health Savings Account (HSA) upload file to go to our Insurance vendor. Here's a summary
Table1: PS_AL_CHK_DED
Description: This table stores all deductions in an employee's paycheck. I'm specifically looking for a field in that table called AL_DEDCD where it equals "H". This is the deduction from the employee's paycheck.
Description: This table stores the employer contribution based on their deduction. For example, we match 50% of their contribution. It is possible for the employee to have a deduction (stored in the ps_al_chk_ded table) but it is not possible for them to have an employer contribution (stored in ps_al_chk_memo) without a deduction (stored in the ps_al_chk_ded).
What I want in my output is a combination of these tables that looks at the employee in the ps_al_chk_ded table, takes only the records where al_dedcd = H and returns the corresponding employer contribution (memo_cd =H in al_chk_memo). So you almost have to join the two tables on all three of those fields and I can't get it to work. Here is what I would like the data to look like:
This didn't seem like it was too complicated but no matter how I do it, I can never get the appropriate amount from the employer contribution. I attached a screenshot that shows my queries and result set. In the screenshot, it returned the employee deduction just fine but then returns 48.25 for the employer contribution. However, the MEMO_CD in that specific record is equal to T. In this case, it should return 0.00 for the employer contribution. If I try and add something like d.al_dedcd = c.memo_cd on the join, I barely get any results. The key is matching on those fields and then returning 0.00 when there is no record of MEMO_CD = H in the al_chk_memo table for the deduction in ps_al_chk_memo.
All I have a table full of invoices and in that table there is a field named HCC. An invoice can contain multiple HCC's. I also have a table named hierarchical codes (below is an example)
(COL1)HCC...........(COL2)If any of the HCCs in this column exist on an invoice along with the HCC in column 1 then use HCC listed in column one 1 2 3.......................4 4 6 8.......................9 ,10 ,11 ,12 ,13
[code]...
I want to return invoice 1 with HCC set to 34 since the hierarchy for when any of these HCCs (35 ,36 ,37 ,38) exist on an invoice along with 34 is 34.
I have three sprocs and three tables. I was told to use a clustered index in the first table and a unique clustered index on the second table. I never asked about the third table and the person I need to ask is on vacation. Most of the contents of the first table will be joined with all of the contents of the second table into the third table. Do I need to have a unique clustered index on the third table too?
The clustered index in the first sproc is on a unique key that I had created using by concatenating several columns together.
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX IX_UNIQUE_KEY ON MRP.Margin_Optimization_Data (UNIQUE_KEY); CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_DATE ON MRP.Margin_Optimization_Data (PERIOD); CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_ODS_ID ON MRP.Margin_Optimization_Data (GL_SEG1_COMPANY_ODS_ID, GL_SEG2_PROFIT_CTR_ODS_ID, GL_SEG3_LOB_ODS_ID, GL_SEG4_PRODUCT_DEPT_ODS_ID, GL_SEG5_ACCOUNT_ODS_ID);
The second sproc with the unique clustered index is on the unique key from the first table and a date attribute.
CREATE UNIQUE CLUSTERED INDEX IX_UNIQUE_KEY ON MRP.[MGN_OPT_KPI_SOURCE] (UNIQUE_KEY, PERIOD);
In the third sproc, I'll have a nonclusted index on the ODS_ID attributes, but I'm unsure of how to go about the clustered index situation.
CREATE NONCLUSTERED INDEX IX_ODS_ID ON MRP.MGN_OPT_KPI_VALUES (GL_SEG1_COMPANY_ODS_ID, GL_SEG2_PROFIT_CTR_ODS_ID, GL_SEG3_LOB_ODS_ID, GL_SEG4_PRODUCT_DEPT_ODS_ID, GL_SEG5_ACCOUNT_ODS_ID);
In my report, I am having Listbox for users to choose Country, City & Company. The user can choose Country. Based on the country selection, cities will be listed out. Based on the city selection, Companies will be listed out. They can choose companies.
Now, I have to show two set of results.
A. List of Companies as per selection ( dataset with equal to selection )
B. List of Companies which are not selected ( ie dataset with not equal to selection )
I have created a dataset with all companies and filter it by selection. When I tried with the filter option in the Dataset, I am able to check for only one value and not for multiple value. If the selection is one company, then I can filter it. But if they choose 5 companies, I am not not able to filter it. Is there any other option I can try out.
As you can see, some Divisions have no correspondents in Doc, I want to show the count(1) result as 0 for those Division, and output the result in the order by DivID
In the T-SQL below, I retrieved data from two queries and I've tried to join them to create a report in SSRS 2008 R2. The SQL runs, but I can't create a report from it. (I also couldn't get this query to run in an Excel file that connects to my SQL Server data base. I've used other T-SQL queries in this Excel file and they run fine.) I think that's because I am creating temporary tables. How do I modify my SQL so that I can get the same result without creating temporary tables?
/*This T-SQL gets the services for the EPN download from WITS*/
-- Select services entered in the last 20 days along with the MPI number and program code.
SELECT DISTINCT dbo.group_session_client.note, dbo.group_session_client.error_note, dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id, dbo.group_session_client.group_session_client_id, dbo.group_session.signed_note, dbo.group_session.unsigned_note into #temp_group_sessions FROM dbo.group_session_client, dbo.group_session WHERE dbo.group_session_client.group_session_id = dbo.group_session.group_session_id
-- Form an outer join selecting all services with any group notes attached to them.
select * from #temp_services LEFT OUTER JOIN #temp_group_sessions on #temp_services.group_session_client_id = #temp_group_sessions.group_session_client_id ;
-- Drop temporary tables
DROP TABLE #temp_group_sessions; DROP TABLE #temp_services;
How to count the number of values that exist in a row based on the values from an array of numbers. Basically the the array of numbers I want to look for are in row 1 of table [test 1] and I want to search for them and count the "out of" in table [test 2]. Excuse me for not using the easiest way to convey my question below. I guess in short I have 10 numbers and like to find how many of those numbers exist in each row. short example:
I am editing a pre-existing view.This view is already bringing data from 40+ tables so I am to modify itwithout screwing with anything else that is already in there.I need to (left) join it with a new table that lists deposits and thedates they are due. What I need is to print, for each record in theview, the due date for the next deposit due and the total of allpayments that they will have made by the next due date.So this is how things are. I join the table and it obviously bringsmultiple records for each record (one for each matching one in the newtable). I need, instead, to be able to make out what due date I shouldprint (the first one that is GETDATE()?) and the total of deposits upto that date.Now, payments can be either dollar amounts or percentages of anotheramount in the view. So if it's an amount I add it, if it's a % Icalculate the amount and add it.Example:for group X of clients...Deposit 1 due on oct 1: $20Deposit 2 due on oct 15: $30Deposit 3 due on nov 15: $40Deposit 4 due on nov 30: $50for group Y of clients...Deposit 1 due on Oct 30: $200Deposit 2 due on Nov 30: $300Deposit 3 due on Dec 30: $400So when if I execute the view today (Nov 7th) each client from group Xshould have:Next Due Date: nov 15. Total: $90 (deposit 1 + deposit 2 + deposit 3)Group Y should have:Next Due Date: Nov 30, total: $500 (Deposit 1 + deposit 2)And so on.
I have a script that I use after some amount of data massaging (not shown). I would like to be able to change the
1) denominator value (the value 8 in line 32 of my code) based on how many columns are selected by the where clause:
where left(CapNumber,charindex('_', CapNumber)-1) = 1where capNumber is a value like [1_1], [1_4], [1_6]...[1_9] capNumber can be any values from [1_1]...[14_10] depending upon the specialty value (example: Allergy) and the final number after the equal sign is a number from 1 to 14)
2) I'd like to dynamically determine the series depending upon which values correspond to the specialty and run for each where: left(CapNumber,charindex('_', CapNumber)-1) = n. n is a number between 1 and 14.
3) finally I'd like to dynamically determine the columns in line 31 (4th line from the bottom)
If I do it by hand it's 23 * 14 separate runs to get separate results for each CapNumber series within specialty. The capNumber series is like [1_1], [1_2], [1_3],[1_4], [1_5], [1_6], [1_7], [1_8],[1_9] ... [8_4],[8_7] ... [14_1], [14_2],...[14_10] etc.
Again, the series are usually discontinuous and specific to each specialty.
Here's the portion of the script (it's at the end) that I'm talking about:
--change values in square brackets below for each specialty as needed and change the denom number in the very last query.
if object_id('tempdb..#tempAllergy') is not null drop table #tempAllergy select * into #tempAllergy from dbo.#temp2 T
[Code] ....
If I were to do it manually I'd uncomment each series line in turn and comment the one I just ran.
I have 2 queries where I select all accounts with bill code in 'bmonit' example ('12','39','124','1FA') then I also have a Select where the same account might have additional services, that are not in example ('12','39','124','1FA') and for these accounts I need to just put a 'Y' if stop_date is null.
I have a table (can't change the schema of it since it is part of an off the shelf app ) that has columns for individuals which I need to extract several pieces of information, essentially Phone, Email Address, etc. See U1 - U6
What is a better way to return this information rather than multiple joins?
I want to aggregate to monthly values for the reading. I want to display Reading value for Oct 2010, November 2010 likewise My question is simple and I have tried to follow the etiquette.
IF OBJECT_ID('TempDB..#mytable','U') IS NOT NULL DROP TABLE #mytable
--===== Create the test table with
CREATE TABLE #mytable ( meterID INT PRIMARY KEY, Readingdate DATETIME, reading real )
--===== Setup any special required conditions especially where dates are concerned
SET DATEFORMAT DMY SELECT '4','Oct 17 2013 12:00AM','5.1709' UNION ALL SELECT '4','Oct 17 2013 12:15AM','5.5319' UNION ALL SELECT '4','Nov 17 2013 12:00AM','5.5793' UNION ALL SELECT '4','Nov 17 2013 14:00AM','5.2471' UNION ALL SELECT '5','Nov 17 2013 12:00AM','5.1177' UNION ALL SELECT '5','Nov 17 2013 14:00AM','5.5510' UNION ALL SELECT '5','Dec 17 2013 15:00AM','5.5128', UNION ALL SELECT '5','Dec 17 2013 16:00AM','5.5758' UNION ALL
Output should display as
MeterId Period Reading
4 Oct 13 10.20 4 Nov 13 10.40 5 Oct 13 10.20 5 Nov 13 10.40 4 Dec 13 11.15
I have a object variable named "UserList" which gets populated through execute sql task - stored procedure.I wish to concatenate all the values in "UserList" using ssis script task - in lang vb.Output should be like (User1,User2,User3,....)
I have 2 identical tables one contains current settings, the other contains all historical settings.I could create a union view to display the current values from table A and all historical values from table B, butthat would also require a Variable to hold the tblid for both select statements.
Q. Can this be done with one joined or conditional select statement?
DECLARE @tblid int = 501 SELECT 1,2,3,4,'CurrentSetting' FROM TableA ta WHERE tblid = @tblid UNION SELECT 1,2,3,4,'PreviosSetting' FROM Tableb tb WHERE tblid = @tblid
I have a problem with trying to pull postcodes from a table when I have a lookup table which provides me with a StartPostCode and an EndPostCode.
For instance if, in the input table I have a postcode BETWEEN two values eg: CV1 and CV10 I want to get a third value from the look up table.My problem is my query seems to bring two values back even if the postcode is between the ranges specified.To reproduce the problem first create the tables and populate with the data.
USE [CTSStaging] GO /****** Object: Table [dbo].[st_StobartPostCode] Script Date: 10/23/2014 12:42:25 ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
table2 is intially populated (basically this will serve as historical table for view); temptable and table2 will are similar except that table2 has two extra columns which are insertdt and updatedt
process: 1. get data from an existing view and insert in temptable 2. truncate/delete contents of table1 3. insert data in table1 by comparing temptable vs table2 (values that exists in temptable but not in table2 will be inserted) 4. insert data in table2 which are not yet present (comparing ID in t2 and temptable) 5. UPDATE table2 whose field/column VALUE is not equal with temptable. (meaning UNMATCHED VALUE)
* for #5 if a value from table2 (historical table) has changed compared to temptable (new result of view) this must be updated as well as the updateddt field value.
I am working on some data that is JOINing to another table. Not a big thing. In the child table, there are different values for a single ID. I want to be able to select the Max ColorID that is Not Null, for each distinct CarID. The CarID is what I am joining the other table with. I need selecting the distinct row with the Max ColorID that is not Null. All this data is made up, so nothing looks logical in the design.
DECLARE @ColorList TABLE ( CarID float , ColorID int ) INSERT INTO @ColorList SELECT 1.55948815793043E+15, 9 UNION ALL SELECT 1.55948815793043E+15, 27 UNION ALL
Now for columns Week1 to week3 if value is 0 then i want to display by searching next week value, if it is also 0 then go for next week and if value found there then display instead of zero. so my output would be as below instead of above.
I've tried all sorts of code i.e. cross apply, running totals, etc. Cannot get this to work. I am trying to add a previous row value but only doing it for each group.
I would like to set the start time of the next row to be equal to the previous row time + duration. I know the start time of each group of 'Items' when the 'Sequence' number = 1. The last 'duration' value in the group would be ignored.
I am currently reading through Itzik Ben-Gan's "Microsoft SQL Server 2012 High-Performance T-SQL using Windows Functions." In attempt to test the SUM OVER() function in SQL 2008 because that's what I've got. I do not currently have sample data (trying to generate it has become a major PITA), but I have some pseudocode.
My current code (actual production code) pulls a bunch of ITD (inception to date) contracts then calculates a certain dollar amount based on monthly changes. Not all contracts have values during a given month, so here's what I cobbled together a few months ago. (Per our finance team, these numbers ARE accurate).
WITH MonthlyVals AS (SELECT ContractID, SUM(Col1 - (Col2 + Col3 + Col4 + Col5)) AS MyTotal FROM MyTable WHERE MyDate >= @ThisMonthStartDate AND MyDate <= @ThisMonthEndDate AND StatementType IN (8,4,2)
[code]....
To test the totals, I also added a COMPUTE SUM(MyTotal) to the end of each query. (Yes, I know COMPUTE is deprecated. Just wanted a quick check.). The difference between the two bits of code was over 68k, with the SUM OVER() code coming up with a total higher than the CTE code. I know CTE code is correct for a fact. It went through extensive testing before getting put in Production. Is it the way I joined the table for the SUM OVER()? Or is it the use of PARITION BY?
Trying to use LIKE / NOT LIKE to identify values that contain any alphanumeric characters outside of A-Z e.g £%$^&*_-{[@ etc etc
The field should contain only values between A-G with a numberic e.g ABCD1234567... but some rows have characters such as above, some have spaces (weeps) , and some have letters outside the A-G range ....
I have a small problem with a join clause, because i need to return all values from my table BL:
my code is:
SELECT cast(0 as bit) as 'Escolha',data, contado , ollocal ,origem, ousrdata,ousrhora FROM ( SELECT noconta,banco, u_area FROM BL
[code]....
In fact, i need to return 2 accounts (16,35) - x.NOCONTA IN (16,35), but I know that the problem is on the WHERE clause.How can do that, because i need all the condition on WHERE clause regarding my table OL, but also, i need to return my two accounts (16,35).
