set StateExceptionIndicator = '1' where sublinecode in ('345','347') and classificationcode = '80050' and statecode = '20'
select * from herm_Gen_Liab_Pre
The problem is there is a column in this table called riskidCoPaymentPercentageMoldDamageCoverageCode and I have to insert value '1' into that column based on this select query
select cast(pd.policyno as varchar(9)),pf.formno
from premiumdirect pd join policyforms pf on pd.policyno = pf.policyno
where pd.entrydate between '01/01/2004' and '12/31/2007'
and pf.formno in ('CG2167','CG3131')
and exists
( select policyno from premiumdirect p join premiumstatdirect ps
on substring(pd.policyno,1,9) = substring(pf.policyno,1,9)
where ps.LineOfBusinessCode in ( '170', '052' , '152' , '171', '175', '180')
and ps.sublinecode in ('334','335','336','337','338','339'))
order by pd.entrydate
How can i insert implement this. I tried temp variable, was successful partially, so need a better approach to it.
Hi Friends,I have 3 labels Steet,City,Pincode and 3 textboxes related to the labels and one button as nae 'Address'I gave the data for Street:abc,City:xyz,Pincode:123 and have to insert into the table.I created one table in the database with table name Adreess and column address varchar(100)but after giving the values in the textboxes and clicked on the button its throwing the exception i.e System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: The name "abcxyz123" is not permitted in this context. Valid expressions are constants, constant expressions, and (in some contexts) variables. Column names are not permitted.I wrote the code like following protected void Button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { string street = txtStreetNo.Text; string city = txtCity.Text; string pincode = txtPincode.Text; string com = street + city+pincode; conn.Open(); SqlDataAdapter daInsert = new SqlDataAdapter("insert into Address values(" + com.ToString() + ")", conn); daInsert.SelectCommand.ExecuteNonQuery();--->here its giving the exception conn.Close(); Response.Write("the values are inserted"); }Please any one tell me am I did the code write or not if its not please give any suggetionsthanksGeeta
hello i want to ask if the insertion of a record into a partion is slower than insertion it into a non partitioned table or not? cuz sql has to decide to wich partion the record has to insert according to the partitioning key and is this decesion process is making insertion slower ?
I want XML data to be inserted int SQL table but could not figure out. #Currency is my table with assocaite columns and @XMLCurrency is a variable which holds XML string. How can I insert this XML data to my table.
Create table #Currency (CurrencyId int ,ISOCode nvarchar(10),ISONumbricCOde int,ISOName nvarchar(50), IsEnabledForMPV int default 0) Declare @XMLCurrency nvarchar(max) Set @XMLCurrency='<R><T><A>0</A><B>USD</B><C>840</C><D>US Dollar</D></T></R>'
Value 840 should insert into column ISONumbricCOde . value USD should be insert into ISOCode column. value 0 should insert into column CurrencyId. values US Dollar should insert into column ISOName .
Hi,I have a table with 20.000.000 of tuples.I have been monitoring the performance of the insertion and updates,but not convince me at all.The table have 30 columns, what and 12 of it, are calcultated column.The test that i do was this:1 Insertion with all the columns and calculing the calcultated columnsin the insertion sentence.1 insertion and all the columns calculated in @vars..1 insertion with the basic fields, and 10 updates.And the result was that the last test was the most performant.What is your opinion?
I need to know the best approach to save data in master table and then in detail table. I know this method but i know it's not a good approach why i will explain
Insertion in Master Table..................................... A
Insertion in Detail Table........................................B
Now if there is any exception occurred while step A then the step B will not take place which is ok but if there is exception while step B then the process A will have completed i.e the data in master table will be Inserted/Deleted/Updated but there will not be a corresponding action in Detail table which is not good approach.
So please can any one tell me a good approach for this.
I have a relatively noobish query and I am hoping to get a solution to it.
Heres the query in a nutshell.
I have a 'Type' table which has a 'TypeName' varchar attribute. So when I do a row insert into this Type table, I want a new table created with the value I insert into the 'TypeName' column as the table name.
For example If i insert 'xyz' into the 'Type' table for the 'TypeName' column. I wish for a trigger to fire which will create a table 'xyz' with some set attributes. I am really new to SQL Server and my preliminary googling left me disheartened with the results. So here I am.
I hope I was clear in the way I expressed my doubt and also that the people here might be able to help me out in this quest.
I want to insert data into Header and Details table simultaneously using SQLBulkCopy. Header table contains an Identity columns and Details table contains Foreign Key to this identity column in Header Table.I want to use DataTable as datasource in SQLBulkCopy.Can any body help on this
This problem is connected with the query i posted yesterday regarding insertion of global variables. I was able to insert the variable in a table to check its value.
This value is mapped to the global variable in a previous Execute SQL Task. But when I use the same global variable to insert in a table, default value 0 is inserted.
My query is does the global variable declared at the package level does not store the value mapped across multiple tasks in control flow?
How can i insert the value stored in a variable in a table from previous SQL Task.
Can anyone suggest some solution,links to try a workaround?
I think this is a very simple question, however, I don't know the answer. What is the difference between a regular Temp table and a Global Temp table? I need to create a temp table within an sp that all users will use. I want the table recreated each time someone accesses the sp, though, because some of the same info may need to be inserted and I don't want any PK errors.
HI, How to create package in SSIS by applying the business Logic like if the record already exist it should be and update else it should be an insert in the destination table. how to achive this funcality in SQL SERVER 2005 (Business Intelligence studion).
Consider a 4 tables where 1 of them is considered to be as the parent class and the other 3 are sub-classes and they are disjoint so for every recored i insert in the parent class i want to also insert in one of the subclass according to a condition which checks a certain attribute in the recored that is also entered in the parent class .. how could this be done .
I found out that executing the procedure SP_INDEXOPTION and setting 'AllowRowLocks' to false i can prevent the sql server from locking rows in a table and 'AllowPageLocks' prevents from pages being locked. I need to preform same operation in case of tables. I need to perform insertion operations concurrently and acquire required locks manually. Is there a way to stop sqlserver from acquiring locks on the table. I need to disable all the locks (row, page and table).
i am inserting something into the temp table even without creating it before. But this does not give any compilation error. Only when I want to execute the stored procedure I get the error message that there is an invalid temp table. Should this not result in a compilation error rather during the execution time.?
--create the procedure and insert into the temp table without creating it. --no compilation error. CREATE PROC testTemp AS BEGIN INSERT INTO #tmp(dt) SELECT GETDATE() END
only on calling the proc does this give an execution error
Simple example: declare @tTable(col1 int) insert into @tTable(col1) values (1) select * from @tTable
Works perfectly in SQL Server Management Studio and the database connection is OK to as I may generate PP table using complex (or simple) queries without difficulty.
But when trying to get this same result in a PP table I get an error, idem when replacing table variable by a temporary table.
Message: OLE DB or ODBC error. .... The current operation was cancelled because another operation the the transaction failed.
If on the source I have a new column, the script generated by SqlPackage.exe recreates the table on the background with moving the data into a temp storage. If the table is big, such approach can cause issues.
Example of the script is below: in the source project I added columns [MyColumn_LINE_1] and [MyColumn_LINE_5].
Is there any way I can make it generating an alter statement instead?
BEGIN TRANSACTION; SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE; SET XACT_ABORT ON; CREATE TABLE [dbo].[tmp_ms_xx_MyTable] ( [MyColumn_TYPE_CODE] CHAR (3) NOT NULL,
[Code] ....
The same script is generated regardless the table having data or not, having a clustered or nonclustered PK.
The SP UserPersist_GetByCriteria does a "SELECT * FROM tbl_User WHERE gender = @Gender AND culture = @Culture", so why am I receiving this error when both tables have the same structure?
The error is being reported as coming from UserPersist_GetByCriteria on the "SELECT * FROM tbl_User" line.
I want to insert the data from temp table to other table. Only condition is, it needs to sorted based on tool number and tool date. For example if we have ten records for tool number 1000, it should be order by tool number and then based on tool_dt. Both tables doesn't have any primary keys. Please find below my code. I removed all the unnecessary columns for simple understanding. INSERT INTO tool_summary (tool_nbr, tool_dt) select tool_nbr, tool_dt from #tool order by tool_nbr, tool_dt...But this query is not working as expected. Data is getting shuffled.
WE have a job that loads data from an Oralce DB into our SQL Server 2000 DB twice a day. The schedule has just changed so that now there is a possibility of having my west coast users impacted when it runs at 5 PM PST and my east coast users impacted when it runs at 7 AM EST. As a workaround, I have developed a DTS package that loads the data into temp tables instead of the real tables. IE. Oracle -> XTable_temp instead of Oracle -> XTable. The load sometimes takes about an hour to an hour and a half to load, so this solution works great, but I want to then lock the table, delete it and rename the temp table to table X. The pseudo code would be:
Begin Transaction
Lock Table XTable
Drop XTable
Alter Table XTable_temp rename to XTable
Release Lock XTable
End Transaction
Create XTable_temp
I see two issues with this solution. 1) I think if I can lock XTable that the lock would be released when the table is dropped and the XTable_temp was being renamed. 2) I can't find a command to rename a table.
I want to pass the 'inserted' table from a trigger into an SP, I think I need to do this by dumping inserted table into a temporary table and passing the temp table. However, I need to do this for many tables, and don't want to list all the column names for each table/trigger (maintenance nightmare).
Can I dump the 'inserted' table to a temp table WITHOUT specifying the column names?
I need to decide what is better to use: global temp table ( I can't use local one) or permanent table in SQL 2000 stored procedures. I extract data from linked server table and update several tables on our server. Those procedures scheduled to run every 3 hours.
Another question: for some reasons when I used global temp table, I wasn't able to schedule multi steps with every step executing one of the stored procedures.I think global temp tables should be visible to other stored procedures, right?
Hi everyone, I'm fairly new to sql and right now I am struggling with a script. I am trying to extract data from a normal table into a temporary table, update it in the temporary table, then put it back into the normal table. I'll display my code, let me know what you think, any suggestions are appreciated. Thanks a lot.
Hi, I wanna know is there any advantage of perf gain when using Derived Tables over Temp Tables, advice me which one is better to use. Can I create Indexes and Insert/Update records into Derived Tables.
Hi All,Hope someone can help me...Im trying to highlight the advantages of using table variables asapposed to temp tables within single scope.My manager seems to believe that table variables are not advantageousbecause they reside in memory.He also seems to believe that temp tables do not use memory...Does anyone know how SQL server could read data from a temp tablewithout passing the data contained therein through memory???Is this a valid advantage/disadvantage of table variables VS temptables?