Has anyone had problems with this limitation before or could explain to me what the purpose of this limit is for? It obviously does allow you to publish more than 246 (we have been publishing more than 700 for years). Is this new with SQL 2005? Is my publication going to stop one day and tell me there are too many articles?
Thanks in advance.
Martin
I have created a local user on Report Server Computer and the user has the administrative rights.
When i try to connect Report Server (http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/reportserver) with this user's credantials. (ReportServer directory security is set -only- to Basic Authentication. ).
I get the following error.
Reporting Services Error
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number of requests for "XXXServerXXXUser" has exceeded the maximum number allowed for a single user.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL Server Reporting Services
Then i try to login using a different user with administrative rights on the machine, i can logon successfully.
The system is up for a month but this problem occured today?!? What could be the problem?!?
I have a situation with a 6 server setup whereby merge agentswill not run if other merge agents are alreay running. Basicallywe have a 5 laptop, one tower config with the tower being thepublisher. In theory we want to be able to hook a laptop upand have it sync within, say, 5 mins. Trouble is, if agents forthe other laptops are running (trying and failing to connect becausethose laptops aren't connected) then the agents for the laptop that*is* connected won't run. It seems to be a 'maximum number of runningagents' issue. Is this is user defined setting, and if so where can I set it?Many thanks, sorry if this has been answered many many times before.Jim--Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk"Brace yourself, this might make your eyes water."
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have some code I build 2 weeks ago which I’ve been running daily but it’s suddenly stopped working with the following error.
“The table "tbl_Intraday_Tmp" has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes. INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit” When I google this there seems to be a related to tables with vast numbers of columns.
My table tbl_Intraday_tmp is relatively small. It has 7 columns. 1 of varchar(5), 3 of decimal(9,3) and 2 of decimal(18,0). The bit I’m puzzled with is it was working and stopped.
I don’t recall changing anything but I wouldn’t rule that out. I ‘ve inspected the source files and I don’t believe they have changed either.
DECLARE
@FileName varchar(50),
@Path varchar(50),
@SqlCmd varchar(1000)
= '',
@ASXCode varchar(5),
@Offset decimal(18,0),
[code]....
I am using MS SQL server 2008, and i have a table with 350 columns and when i m trying to create one more column its giving error with below message -
Warning: The table XXX has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes.
INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit.
how can i resolve this?
I wonder if anyone can advise, I currently have a replication set to 5 offices. Which has been working fine for some 18 months+, then the replication dropped out. When I looked in the publisher it had lost all its articles and would not allow me to add back in. I deleted the publication and recreated it and then after creating a new snapshot starting rolling back out to the various locations, and one of the locations failed and again all the articles where lost. I deleted and rebuilt the database at that office and went through the same routine again, only for it to happen again, the issue being that now errors where produced!!!.
So at present I have the publication and all the subscriptions running apart from this one office.
Has anyone had this before, or any ideas. I have run a full virus scan just in case and it was fine.
I have an existing publication in sql 2012 with 2 articles, and then I add 2 more articles. After that when I generate a snapshot, will the snapshot be generated for 2 new articles only or for all 4 articles?
I remember adding 1 new articles to one existing publication with 150 articles and when I generated snapshot, it was generated only for 1 article. But I don't remember clearly.
Does it behave differently for small and large number of articles?
-----Table Proc Index Performance TSQL &&%$#@*(#@$%.......------------
We have restored a database on new server without keeping replication settings. Now while creating the publication no tables are shown in new publication wizard window. In fact we have hundred of tables in database and included in replication on source server from where backup was taken.
What may be the reason that tables are not appearing?
We have setup a replication in SQL2000:
We have DTS package automatically pouring data into the publishing database(source tables). During this process, we want to temporary disable certain triggers. However, the command
Alter table 'tbl' disable trigger 'abc' errored out. The error message said:
''Cannot alter the table 'tbl' because it is being published for replication."
I've digged more into this and found although it's not allowed to disable a triggers,
the SQLServer do allow delete the trigger and recreate them.
Is there any way to disable the trigger directly?
Thanks in advance,
Don
BTW:
I've used the following sql directly, however the trigger still fires.
UPDATE
sysobjects
SET
status = status|2048
WHERE
type = 'TR'
AND
parent_obj = OBJECT_ID (@table_name)
The only other way around now is to create stored procedures that dynamically create the trigger. Because our trigger is normmally larger than 8000 bytes. We have to create one stored procedure per trigger. This option is not acceptable because not only it takes quite a time, but also a maintainance nightmare.
Here is something that perhaps a lot of you out there wonder about..
My company is on a large Enterprise Project.
The database plans for this to be fully supported predict 1000+ stored procedures.
Question:
Will there be any limitation for an SQL Server 2000 to handle so many stored procs?
and if there is a limitation what will we have to do in order to work around it?
SQL Server 2000 8.00.760 (SP3)I've been working on a test system and the following UDF worked fine.It runs in the "current" database, and references another database onthe same server called 127-SuperQuote.CREATE FUNCTION fnGetFormattedAddress(@WorkID int)RETURNS varchar(130)ASBEGINDECLARE@Address1 As varchar(50)@ReturnAddress As varchar(130)SELECT@Address1 = [127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany.Address1FROM[Work] INNER JOIN[127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany ON [Work].ClientID =[127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany.CompanyIDWHERE[Work].WorkID = @WorkIDIF @Address1 IS NOT NULLSET @ReturnAddress = @ReturnAddress + @Address1 + CHAR(13)+ CHAR(10)RETURN @ReturnAddressENDSo now the system has gone live and it turns out that the live"SuperQuote" database is on a different server.I've linked the server and changed the function as below, but I get anerror both in QA and when checking Syntax in the UDF builder:The number name 'Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany' contains more than themaximum number of prefixes. The maximum is 3.CREATE FUNCTION fnGetFormattedAddress(@WorkID int)RETURNS varchar(130)ASBEGINDECLARE@Address1 As varchar(50)@ReturnAddress As varchar(130)SELECT@Address1 = Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany.Address1FROM[Work] INNER JOINZen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany ON [Work].ClientID =Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany.CompanyIDWHERE[Work].WorkID = @WorkIDIF @Address1 IS NOT NULLSET @ReturnAddress = @ReturnAddress + @Address1 + CHAR(13)+ CHAR(10)RETURN @ReturnAddressENDHow can I get round this? By the way, I've rather simplified thefunction to ease readability. Also, I haven't posted any DDL because Idon't think that's the problem!ThanksEdward
View 2 Replies View Related
We have a SQLServer 2005 Enterprise merge replication publication with SQL Mobile 3.0 subscribers (Windows Mobile 5.0 and 6.0). We do not use pre-computed partitions due to trigger performance issues with an SSIS/ETL application that supplies data to the merge database. We do use the "Optimize" (=true) option, though we have tried this both ways with no significant differences. We use filters and joins for each worker ID (as HOST_ID) from the subscriptions.
The sync times become increasingly worse after we run the snapshot and bring the publication online. I have tried rerunning the snapshots, this helps little, as it often behaves like the subscription was set to reinitialize and forces a big sync (reload of all data) to the subscriber. We have tried much of the obvious (e.g., flattening filters and joins, adding indexes, etc.).
When users are synchronizing, we watch replication monitor and notice that a lot of time is spent processing "enumerating inserts and updates for article [any article]", especially processing the many generations and batches. This is true for any follow-up syncs after the 1st big sync (initializing the subscription).
I read several posts regarding the batches and generations of changes, and decided to try increasing the DownloadGenerationsPerBatch?. I tried adding this parameter to the snapshot agent job, and the job fails each time with a vague message, even with the default value of 100. How do you change this parameter for SQLServer 2005 Enterprise?
Any suggestions?
Thanks in advance,
Matt
Hi,
I disabled a merge publication on my server. I then ran sp_removedbreplication to clean the system tables. Thats fine. When I recreate a new publication on my server now, I still get the red x on my publisher node in my replcation monitor from the error I was getting before. Evenm though this publication is error free. Is it saving an srror flag in one of the sytem tabbles
Any ideas on this?
Thanks
I am running merge replication (SQL 2000 with SP2) with an anonymous pull subscription. The application vendor has come out with update that requires adding a table to a database. The vendor has created scripts that will add the table, as well as some stored procedures. If I apply the scripts to both servers and add the table as a new article to the publication, am I going to have to apply a snapshot of the entire database (which is very large)?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Gary
I tried to drop a merge replication publication and it is giving me an invalid object name dbo.ms_mergeagents message. I tried to drop using:
SSMS
sp_dropmergepublication
sp_replicationdboption
I got the last two from Microsoft KB article 324401. The subscription was never created because it gave another error invalid object_name msmerge_subscriptions. I can create new publications but not drop the existing ones.
Please assist...
Help!!! This is really frustrating me down!
I was trying to follow the MS official tutorial "Creating a mobile application with SQL server mobile" could be found in this link
http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms171908.aspx
In the step of creating a merge publication, as I noticed, the snapshot agent is started sucessfully. But very soon later (few seconds), it was shut down with an error message. I checked in the error history, the following message I found:
"... The replication agent encountered a failure. The step failed"
I also went to msdb.dbo.sysjobsteps and found "Detected nonlogged agent shutdown".
Anyone could help?
I am having a problem with merge replication after recreating a publication. It is a simple two-way replication between two servers allowing applications to update data at both ends, i.e. 1 publisher, 1 subscriber for all tables except some junk ones. The problem started after I did the following:
1) I dropped and recreated the publication to allow for some changes to the database schema. These caused problems so I dropped the subscription and publication and restored the databases at each end from backups taken before we started.
2) When I created the publication again, it wouldn't let me use the same name as it thought the publication already existed. It let me use a different name instead.
3) Most things work OK but one of the tables is not replicating inserts from the subscriber to the publisher. There are no errors and no conflicts, other similar tables replicate OK. Inserts go across the other way OK.
4) I am getting replication conflicts on another table that says 'Unable to synchronize the row because the row was updated by a different process outside of replication'
I believe the problem is to do with the original publication details still being in the restored databases, so am looking to drop the publication & subscription, remove the remnants of the old publication, fix the data and recreate pub & sub. What do I need to do to get rid of the old replication data in the database?
Any help much appreciated.
Hello
I've got the following problem: Our product is delivered with SQL2000 and SQL2005.
Now, there are some schema changes, which I'd like to deploy with T-SQL on the publishers. With SQL2000 I do it with the sp_addmergecolumn etc and on SQL 2005 (if replication compatibility level is 90) with replication of DDL. So far so good.
But how can my T-SQL Script determine, wether the replication of DDL is on? I know there exists sp_helpmergepublication, but how do I get the column replicate_ddl of the result-set?
thanks for your advices.
Aline
Hi,
I am stuck when trying to create a new publication. I fill all the wizard tabs but when finishing I get that message (6 times, one for every table):
Code Block
SQL Server Management Studio could not create article 'applicationModules'. (New Publication Wizard)
------------------------------
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo)
------------------------------
This article cannot use the 'subscriber_upload_options' feature because the publication compatibility level is less than 90. Use sp_changemergepublication to set the publication_compatibility_level of publication 'testMR' to '90RTM'.
Changed database context to 'test'.
Publication 'testMR' has the following property: 'compensate_for_errors'. SQL Server subscribers below version '8.00.0858' will ignore this setting. (Microsoft SQL Server, Error: 21522)
For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft+SQL+Server&ProdVer=09.00.1399&EvtSrc=MSSQLServer&EvtID=21522&LinkId=20476
The error seemed pretty clear, so I end up doing:
EXEC sp_changemergepublication
@publication = N'testMR',
@property = N'publication_compatibility_level',
@value = N'90RTM'
and running the wizard again.
But I got the same error.
The link on the message take me nowhere.
and by googling for error 21522 I couldn't find any help at all.
Please, could anyone help?
Cheers
Hi all,
I have a merge publisher with Snapshot agent for that scheduled to run everyday morning, This was runnning till yesterday. But it is not running today and giving the below error.
Can anyone help me out to solve this error? This is occuring in production environment, i really need a solution as fast as possible.
Error messages:
Message: Failed to read column data
Stack: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.SqlServer.NativeBcpOutProvider.ThrowNativeBcpOutException(CConnection* pNativeConnectionWrapper)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.SqlServer.NativeBcpOutProvider.BcpOut(String strBcpObjectName, String strBcpObjectOwner, String strBaseBcpObjectName, Boolean fUnicodeConversion, String strDataFile, String strLoadOrderingHint, String strWhereClause)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.SqlServer.NativeBcpOutProvider.BcpOut(String strBcpObjectName, String strBcpObjectOwner, String strBaseBcpObjectName, Boolean fUnicodeConversion, String strDataFile, String strLoadOrderingHint)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.SqlServer.NativeBcpOutProvider.BcpOut(String strBcpObjectName, String strBcpObjectOwner, String strDataFile)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.MergeContentsBcpOutWorkItem.DoWork(MergeSnapshotProvider snapshotProvider, IBcpOutProvider bcpOutProvider)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.MergeContentsBcpOutThreadProvider.DoWork(WorkItem workItem)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.WorkerThread.NonExceptionBasedAgentThreadProc()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.WorkerThread.AgentThreadProc()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.AgentCore.BaseAgentThread.AgentThreadProcWrapper() (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 0)
Get help: http://help/0
Message: Shared Memory Provider: No process is on the other end of the pipe.
Stack: (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 233)
Get help: http://help/233
Message: Communication link failure
Stack: (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 233)
Get help: http://help/233
Message: Shared Memory Provider: No process is on the other end of the pipe.
Stack: (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 233)
Get help: http://help/233
Message: Communication link failure
Stack: (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 233)
Thanks,
Thams
Afternoon,
Can anyone relay to me if there is a max number of elements that are allowed within an IN clause?
Example would be:
SELECT * FROM tblMyTable WHERE ID_Number IN (1,2,3,4,5,...150,000)
where we list all 150,000 numbers between the ( ).
Thanks!
Hello.I am trying to use Transact SQL to prepare publication for replication (SQL Server 2000 SP4 and SQL Mobile). I can easily create publication, add filters etc. but there is one thing which I can't find : parameter which tells me subscriber type and allow me to change subscriber type for publication. I don't know where I can change (or even if I can change) this property.
If someone made publication for mobile devices and replication with filters,resolvers etc. will it be a problem to share experiences here? Maybe some sample code with script or something what will guide me. Thanks in advance. Maciej Wysocki
I'm trying to setup merge replication and get the following error from the snapshot agent after I've finished the 'New Publication Wizard'. This doesn't make sense to me as it is an automatic process. Also, it looks like it is complaining about a 'dbo.MSmerge_cont...' view which is a view created automatically for the merge publication.
ERROR MESSAGE:
The identifier that starts with '<EVENT_INSTANCE><EventType>CREATE_VIEW</EventType><PostTime>2006-11-09T09:56:48.390</PostTime><SPID>152</SPID><ServerName>XF4SWC' is too long. Maximum length is 128.
FULL DETAILS:
Message: The identifier that starts with '<EVENT_INSTANCE><EventType>CREATE_VIEW</EventType><PostTime>2006-11-09T09:56:48.390</PostTime><SPID>152</SPID><ServerName>XF4SWC' is too long. Maximum length is 128.
Command Text: IF OBJECT_ID(N'[<EVENT_INSTANCE><EventType>CREATE_VIEW</EventType><PostTime>2006-11-09T09:56:48.390</PostTime><SPID>152</SPID><ServerName>XF4SWCS464</ServerName><LoginName>NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM</LoginName><UserName>dbo</UserName><DatabaseName>liport2_gts</DatabaseName><SchemaName>dbo</SchemaName><ObjectName>MSmerge_contAE2EB588ABFA4C13825D4D44CB2D50CB_90</ObjectName><ObjectType>VIEW</ObjectType><TSQLCommand><SetOptions ANSI_NULLS="OFF" ANSI_NULL_DEFAULT="ON" ANSI_PADDING="ON" QUOTED_IDENTIFIER="ON" ENCRYPTED="FALSE" /><CommandText>create view dbo.MSmerge_contAE2EB588ABFA4C13825D4D44CB2D50CB_90 as select * from MSmerge_contents where 1 = 2</CommandText></TSQLCommand></EVENT_INSTANCE>]', 'V') IS NOT NULL DROP VIEW [<EVENT_INSTANCE><EventType>CREATE_VIEW</EventType><PostTime>2006-11-09T09:56:48.390</PostTime><SPID>152</SPID><ServerName>XF4SWCS464</ServerName><LoginName>NT AUTHORITYSYSTEM</LoginName><UserName>dbo</UserName><DatabaseName>liport2_gts</DatabaseName><SchemaName>dbo</SchemaName><ObjectName>MSmerge_contAE2EB588ABFA4C13825D4D44CB2D50CB_90</ObjectName><ObjectType>VIEW</ObjectType><TSQLCommand><SetOptions ANSI_NULLS="OFF" ANSI_NULL_DEFAULT="ON" ANSI_PADDING="ON" QUOTED_IDENTIFIER="ON" ENCRYPTED="FALSE" /><CommandText>create view dbo.MSmerge_contAE2EB588ABFA4C13825D4D44CB2D50CB_90 as select * from MSmerge_contents where 1 = 2</CommandText></TSQLCommand></EVENT_INSTANCE>]
Parameters:
Stack: at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.AgentCore.ReMapSqlException(SqlException e, SqlCommand command)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.AgentCore.AgentExecuteNonQuery(SqlCommand command, Int32 queryTimeout)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.AgentCore.ExecuteDiscardResults(CommandSetupDelegate commandSetupDelegate, Int32 queryTimeout)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.AgentCore.ExecuteAdHocQueryDiscardResults(String strQuery, SqlConnection connection)
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.MergeSnapshotProvider.GenerateSystemTableBcpFiles()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.MergeSnapshotProvider.DoPostArticleFilesGenerationProcessing()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.Snapshot.SqlServerSnapshotProvider.GenerateSnapshot()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.SnapshotGenerationAgent.InternalRun()
at Microsoft.SqlServer.Replication.AgentCore.Run() (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 103)
Get help: http://help/103
Server XF4SWCS464, Level 15, State 4, Procedure , Line 1
The identifier that starts with '<EVENT_INSTANCE><EventType>CREATE_VIEW</EventType><PostTime>2006-11-09T09:56:48.390</PostTime><SPID>152</SPID><ServerName>XF4SWC' is too long. Maximum length is 128. (Source: MSSQLServer, Error number: 103)
Get help: http://help/103
Hello people,I might sound a little bit crazy, but is there any possibility that youcan incorporate 4^15 (1,073,741,824) tables into a SQL Database?I mean, is it possible at all? There might be a question of whereanyone would want so many tables, but i'm a bioinformatics guy and I'mtrying to deal with genomic sequences and was coming up with a newalgorithm, where the only limit is the number of tables I can put intoa Database.So, can you please advise if its possible to put in so many tables intoa SQL database? Or is the Bekerley DB better?
View 3 Replies View RelatedHi.
How many separate databases can one SQL Server (7.0) manage?
Thanks in advance
Dan
if SQL SERVER 2000 only allow 8060 bytes per row, then how can it store images or CLOB data? Is there a way that would let us change the maximum number of bytes per row? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHello everyone -
Running SQL Server 2000
What is the maximum number of databases that can be had in a single MS SQL installation??
thanks
tony
Hello people,
I might sound a little bit crazy, but is there any possibility that you can incorporate 1,073,741,824 tables into a SQL Database?
I mean, is it possible at all? There might be a question of where anyone would want so many tables, but i'm a bioinformatics guy and I'm trying to deal with genomic sequences and was coming up with a new algorithm, where the only limit is the number of tables I can put into a Database.
So, can you please advise if its possible to put in so many tables into a SQL database? Or is the Bekerley DB better?
Hi,
Could somebody tell what is the maximum number of concurrent connections that are supported in sql server 2005 developer edition?
thanks
Hi,
I am reading SQL Server 2000 Black book (Coriolis publisher) and Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Optimization guide (Jenney Lynne Fields PH publisher).
In the Black book page 56, it says :"..up to a total of 16 instances.
In the optimization guide page 144, it says :"There is no theoretical limit to the number of instances of SQL server you can run simultaneously..."
Who the hell is right??????
Alain Gagne
Lead DBA
gagnea@msagroup.com
Hi all,
I take error 610 "Maximum number of databases that may be accessed by a
transaction is 8. This number has been exceeded by this query" when I
execute a SELECT query.
In this query there are about 12 sub-query.
How can I fix the problem?
Thanks in advance.
Hi,
Can somebody let me know how many (maxi) no of users can be created to deal with MSDERelA ?
With kind regards,
Ashfaque
My db contains two table Employee_detail and Student_Detail.Employee_detail has Emp_id and Student_Detail has stud_id.Now my problem is that i want to get one maximum no from these two table.
View 11 Replies View Related