The Number Of Requests For XXXServerXXXUser Has Exceeded The Maximum Number Allowed For A Single User
Oct 15, 2007
I have created a local user on Report Server Computer and the user has the administrative rights.
When i try to connect Report Server (http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/reportserver) with this user's credantials. (ReportServer directory security is set -only- to Basic Authentication. ).
I get the following error.
Reporting Services Error
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The number of requests for "XXXServerXXXUser" has exceeded the maximum number allowed for a single user.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SQL Server Reporting Services
Then i try to login using a different user with administrative rights on the machine, i can logon successfully.
The system is up for a month but this problem occured today?!? What could be the problem?!?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 1, 2007
My team at work has spent the past week troubleshooting performance issues experienced by users of our asp.net 2.x web application. We've got a probe running on one of the web servers that has identified a frequently occuring error that no one has seen before and I can't find anywhere online. MSSQL error "system.data.oledb.oledbcommand.executenonquery(Maximum number of unique SQL exceeded) Has anyone here ever seen this error before?The web server, application, SQL servers and databases all seem to be configured properly, but users are experiencing latency and this frequently occurring error is a mystery to us.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2000
Is there any way of configuring this parameter?
A work around?
Or have I reached the limits of scalablilty on this issue?
Please assist me
Thanks
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2008
Hello, I received an error while attempting to create a table similar to the following...
CREATE TABLE ExampleTable (
[FIELD_0] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[FIELD_1] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_2] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_3] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_4] [datetime] NULL,
[FIELD_5] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_6] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_7] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_8] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_9] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_10] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_11] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_12] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_13] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_14] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_15] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_16] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_17] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_18] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_19] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_20] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_21] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_22] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_23] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_24] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_25] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_26] [nvarchar](255) NULL,
[FIELD_27] [nvarchar](255) NULL
)
First of all, field names have been changed to protect the innocent. Second, I did *not* create this table...I'm troubleshooting issues with a previously created table. I've no idea why almost every field needs to be an NVARCHAR data type of that size. Finally, as you can probably guess, I'm getting this error on a SQL Server 2000 database. (Yeah, it's past time we upgraded to SQL Server 2005 at least...explain that to management, please. I suggest you speak slowly and use small words.)
Anyhow, the error is "Warning: The table 'ExampleTable' has been created but its maximum row size (13348) exceeds the maximum number of bytes per row (8060). INSERT or UPDATE of a row in this table will fail if the resulting row length exceeds 8060 bytes."
Am I misunderstanding how the row size is calculated? How is SQL Server getting 13,348 bytes from the above statement?
Any and all constructive suggestions/ideas are much appreciated! Thanks!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 15, 2004
I have a SQL2000 enterprise edition with sp3 clustered.
I am creating backup jobs via t-sql for around 680 databases. From MMC sqlAgent jobs, found all jobs (every DB has 7 jobs(M-Sun) are created. But some of (around 20% of the 680*7= 4760 jobs) in the Next Run Date column with value of "(Date and Time are not available". It means these jobs might be skipped to run.
If I right click the job and choose "start", then the job Next Run Date will be the corrent datetime. But when I rerun the t-sql to recreate jobs for these 20%, I get the
[The maximum number of pending SQLServerAgent notifications has been exceeded. The notification will be ignored.]
Is there a way to around it?
thanks
-D
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2007
HelloI am running a DTS (Sql 2000) and transfering data from an SqlServerdatabase to an Ingres database.I am transfering 153k rows.Execution fails with the error message:"The number of failing rows exceeded the maximum specified"The number of rows shouldn't be a problem because in another DTS I copya lot more rows.Also the width of the row shouldn't be a problem, I'm transfering only 3int4 fields and 1 char(5) field.Anyone have an idea what the problem could be ?ThanksDavid Greenberg
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2007
Warning: 0x80019002 at STAGING: The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (14) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.
i got this error in my ssis package, where i'm trying to export flat file data into oledb destination,
can anyone help me to fix this issue!!!
What i've done?
1. Data Flow Task
a. po.txt flat file Source
b. Derived column
c. Oledb destination
a. pend.txt Flat file Source
b. Derived column
c. Oledb destination
a. invoice.txt Flat file Source
b. Derived column
c. Oledb destination
i did three flows in a single data flow task; among that one flow is running (po.txt flow) the rest are returned with Red Box filled error, and i capture the error and pasted there!!
the full error message is...... what i got in my output window is follows
i need some guidence to solve this issue, please let me know if you know about this stuff.
Information: 0x40016041 at STAGING: The package is attempting to configure from the XML file "staging.dtsConfig".
Warning: 0x80012014 at STAGING: The configuration file "staging.dtsConfig" cannot be found. Check the directory and file name.
Warning: 0x80012059 at STAGING: Failed to load at least one of the configuration entries for the package. Check configurations entries and previous warnings to see descriptions of which configuration failed.
SSIS package "STAGING.dtsx" starting.
Information: 0x4004300A at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Validation phase is beginning.
Warning: 0x80047076 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: The output column "Description" (3223) on output "Flat File Source Output" (3161) and component "Invoice Raised Flat File Source" (3160) is not subsequently used in the Data Flow task. Removing this unused output column can increase Data Flow task performance.
Warning: 0x80047076 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: The output column "Project Number" (3080) on output "Flat File Source Output" (3063) and component "Pending Files Flat File Source" (3062) is not subsequently used in the Data Flow task. Removing this unused output column can increase Data Flow task performance.
Information: 0x4004300A at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Validation phase is beginning.
Warning: 0x80047076 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: The output column "Description" (3223) on output "Flat File Source Output" (3161) and component "Invoice Raised Flat File Source" (3160) is not subsequently used in the Data Flow task. Removing this unused output column can increase Data Flow task performance.
Warning: 0x80047076 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: The output column "Project Number" (3080) on output "Flat File Source Output" (3063) and component "Pending Files Flat File Source" (3062) is not subsequently used in the Data Flow task. Removing this unused output column can increase Data Flow task performance.
Information: 0x40043006 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Prepare for Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x40043007 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Pre-Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x402090DC at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, PO Pending Flat File Source [2344]: The processing of file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filespo_pending.txt" has started.
Information: 0x402090DC at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Pending Files Flat File Source [3062]: The processing of file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filespending bills.txt" has started.
Information: 0x402090DC at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Invoice Raised Flat File Source [3160]: The processing of file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filesinvoices_raised.txt" has started.
Information: 0x4004300C at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Execute phase is beginning.
Error: 0xC02020A1 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Invoice Raised Flat File Source [3160]: Data conversion failed. The data conversion for column "Description" returned status value 4 and status text "Text was truncated or one or more characters had no match in the target code page.".
Error: 0xC02020A1 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Pending Files Flat File Source [3062]: Data conversion failed. The data conversion for column "Event Description" returned status value 4 and status text "Text was truncated or one or more characters had no match in the target code page.".
Information: 0x402090DE at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, PO Pending Flat File Source [2344]: The total number of data rows processed for file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filespo_pending.txt" is 76.
Error: 0xC020902A at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Pending Files Flat File Source [3062]: The "output column "Event Description" (3095)" failed because truncation occurred, and the truncation row disposition on "output column "Event Description" (3095)" specifies failure on truncation. A truncation error occurred on the specified object of the specified component.
Error: 0xC020902A at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Invoice Raised Flat File Source [3160]: The "output column "Description" (3223)" failed because truncation occurred, and the truncation row disposition on "output column "Description" (3223)" specifies failure on truncation. A truncation error occurred on the specified object of the specified component.
Error: 0xC0202092 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Pending Files Flat File Source [3062]: An error occurred while processing file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filespending bills.txt" on data row 10.
Error: 0xC0202092 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Invoice Raised Flat File Source [3160]: An error occurred while processing file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filesinvoices_raised.txt" on data row 5.
Error: 0xC0047038 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: The PrimeOutput method on component "Pending Files Flat File Source" (3062) returned error code 0xC0202092. The component returned a failure code when the pipeline engine called PrimeOutput(). The meaning of the failure code is defined by the component, but the error is fatal and the pipeline stopped executing.
Error: 0xC0047038 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: The PrimeOutput method on component "Invoice Raised Flat File Source" (3160) returned error code 0xC0202092. The component returned a failure code when the pipeline engine called PrimeOutput(). The meaning of the failure code is defined by the component, but the error is fatal and the pipeline stopped executing.
Error: 0xC0047021 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Thread "SourceThread2" has exited with error code 0xC0047038.
Error: 0xC0047039 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Thread "WorkThread0" received a shutdown signal and is terminating. The user requested a shutdown, or an error in another thread is causing the pipeline to shutdown.
Error: 0xC0047021 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Thread "WorkThread0" has exited with error code 0xC0047039.
Error: 0xC0047021 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Thread "SourceThread0" has exited with error code 0xC0047038.
Error: 0xC0047039 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Thread "WorkThread2" received a shutdown signal and is terminating. The user requested a shutdown, or an error in another thread is causing the pipeline to shutdown.
Error: 0xC0047021 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Thread "WorkThread2" has exited with error code 0xC0047039.
Information: 0x402090DF at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, PO_PENDING_STG OLE DB Destination [587]: The final commit for the data insertion has started.
Information: 0x402090E0 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, PO_PENDING_STG OLE DB Destination [587]: The final commit for the data insertion has ended.
Information: 0x40043008 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Post Execute phase is beginning.
Information: 0x402090DF at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, INVOICE_STG OLE DB Destination [247]: The final commit for the data insertion has started.
Information: 0x402090E0 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, INVOICE_STG OLE DB Destination [247]: The final commit for the data insertion has ended.
Information: 0x402090DF at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, OLE DB Destination [933]: The final commit for the data insertion has started.
Information: 0x402090E0 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, OLE DB Destination [933]: The final commit for the data insertion has ended.
Information: 0x402090DD at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, PO Pending Flat File Source [2344]: The processing of file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filespo_pending.txt" has ended.
Information: 0x402090DD at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Pending Files Flat File Source [3062]: The processing of file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filespending bills.txt" has ended.
Information: 0x402090DD at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, Invoice Raised Flat File Source [3160]: The processing of file "C:Documents and Settingse402076Desktopitss flat filesinvoices_raised.txt" has ended.
Information: 0x40043009 at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: Cleanup phase is beginning.
Information: 0x4004300B at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: "component "PO_PENDING_STG OLE DB Destination" (587)" wrote 75 rows.
Information: 0x4004300B at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: "component "OLE DB Destination" (933)" wrote 0 rows.
Information: 0x4004300B at Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task, DTS.Pipeline: "component "INVOICE_STG OLE DB Destination" (247)" wrote 0 rows.
Task failed: Staging Table Loading Data Flow Task
Warning: 0x80019002 at STAGING: The Execution method succeeded, but the number of errors raised (14) reached the maximum allowed (1); resulting in failure. This occurs when the number of errors reaches the number specified in MaximumErrorCount. Change the MaximumErrorCount or fix the errors.
SSIS package "STAGING.dtsx" finished: Failure.
The program '[2532] STAGING.dtsx: DTS' has exited with code 0 (0x0).
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2007
Has anyone had problems with this limitation before or could explain to me what the purpose of this limit is for? It obviously does allow you to publish more than 246 (we have been publishing more than 700 for years). Is this new with SQL 2005? Is my publication going to stop one day and tell me there are too many articles?
Thanks in advance.
Martin
View 15 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2001
Hi,
Environment:
I have a Sqlserver 6.5 production server used for web based applications
Compaq 5500 4 GIG RAM, 4 processor
Sql Memory config on that server is 1048576 (which is 2048 MB)
and the run value is 640000 (which is 1250 MB).
runvalue for user connections was 500
We have only 90 user connections may increase upto 100 depends on the connections. We don't have any overload on that server.
Error: I was seeing
"unable to connect maximum no. of 500 configured user connections are already connected" in the error log.
Action Taken:
I increased the user connections to 600
and rebooted the server. Immediately the same error I can see in the error log. But we have only 20 user connections at that time. I can able to connect.
Please advise me to get rid of this error.
Thanks,
Anu.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2006
Hello people,I might sound a little bit crazy, but is there any possibility that youcan incorporate 4^15 (1,073,741,824) tables into a SQL Database?I mean, is it possible at all? There might be a question of whereanyone would want so many tables, but i'm a bioinformatics guy and I'mtrying to deal with genomic sequences and was coming up with a newalgorithm, where the only limit is the number of tables I can put intoa Database.So, can you please advise if its possible to put in so many tables intoa SQL database? Or is the Bekerley DB better?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2015
some times i need to take db in single user mode , which can be done using following
ALTER DATABASE xyz
SET SINGLE_USER WITH NO_WAIT
this has other options but each one has some problems like if any single window is open at any location etc etc.
Q1)so the need is i want to honor running transaction from msss or any application then i want db to get into single mode so that i can perform my task.
Q2) some times i need to restart db as it becomes slow , i am trying to find the reason primarily i have seen it is memory.so i want to restart my db honoring all requests.
View 6 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2008
Afternoon,
Can anyone relay to me if there is a max number of elements that are allowed within an IN clause?
Example would be:
SELECT * FROM tblMyTable WHERE ID_Number IN (1,2,3,4,5,...150,000)
where we list all 150,000 numbers between the ( ).
Thanks!
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2005
SQL Server 2000 8.00.760 (SP3)I've been working on a test system and the following UDF worked fine.It runs in the "current" database, and references another database onthe same server called 127-SuperQuote.CREATE FUNCTION fnGetFormattedAddress(@WorkID int)RETURNS varchar(130)ASBEGINDECLARE@Address1 As varchar(50)@ReturnAddress As varchar(130)SELECT@Address1 = [127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany.Address1FROM[Work] INNER JOIN[127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany ON [Work].ClientID =[127-SuperQuote].dbo.tblCompany.CompanyIDWHERE[Work].WorkID = @WorkIDIF @Address1 IS NOT NULLSET @ReturnAddress = @ReturnAddress + @Address1 + CHAR(13)+ CHAR(10)RETURN @ReturnAddressENDSo now the system has gone live and it turns out that the live"SuperQuote" database is on a different server.I've linked the server and changed the function as below, but I get anerror both in QA and when checking Syntax in the UDF builder:The number name 'Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany' contains more than themaximum number of prefixes. The maximum is 3.CREATE FUNCTION fnGetFormattedAddress(@WorkID int)RETURNS varchar(130)ASBEGINDECLARE@Address1 As varchar(50)@ReturnAddress As varchar(130)SELECT@Address1 = Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany.Address1FROM[Work] INNER JOINZen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany ON [Work].ClientID =Zen.SuperQuote.dbo.tblCompany.CompanyIDWHERE[Work].WorkID = @WorkIDIF @Address1 IS NOT NULLSET @ReturnAddress = @ReturnAddress + @Address1 + CHAR(13)+ CHAR(10)RETURN @ReturnAddressENDHow can I get round this? By the way, I've rather simplified thefunction to ease readability. Also, I haven't posted any DDL because Idon't think that's the problem!ThanksEdward
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2015
I have some code I build 2 weeks ago which I’ve been running daily but it’s suddenly stopped working with the following error.
“The table "tbl_Intraday_Tmp" has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes. INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit” When I google this there seems to be a related to tables with vast numbers of columns.
My table tbl_Intraday_tmp is relatively small. It has 7 columns. 1 of varchar(5), 3 of decimal(9,3) and 2 of decimal(18,0). The bit I’m puzzled with is it was working and stopped.
I don’t recall changing anything but I wouldn’t rule that out. I ‘ve inspected the source files and I don’t believe they have changed either.
DECLARE
@FileName varchar(50),
@Path varchar(50),
@SqlCmd varchar(1000)
= '',
@ASXCode varchar(5),
@Offset decimal(18,0),
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 20, 2012
I am using MS SQL server 2008, and i have a table with 350 columns and when i m trying to create one more column its giving error with below message -
Warning: The table XXX has been created, but its maximum row size exceeds the allowed maximum of 8060 bytes.
INSERT or UPDATE to this table will fail if the resulting row exceeds the size limit.
how can i resolve this?
View 14 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2000
Hi.
How many separate databases can one SQL Server (7.0) manage?
Thanks in advance
Dan
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2001
if SQL SERVER 2000 only allow 8060 bytes per row, then how can it store images or CLOB data? Is there a way that would let us change the maximum number of bytes per row? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2007
Hello everyone -
Running SQL Server 2000
What is the maximum number of databases that can be had in a single MS SQL installation??
thanks
tony
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 26, 2006
Hello people,
I might sound a little bit crazy, but is there any possibility that you can incorporate 1,073,741,824 tables into a SQL Database?
I mean, is it possible at all? There might be a question of where anyone would want so many tables, but i'm a bioinformatics guy and I'm trying to deal with genomic sequences and was coming up with a new algorithm, where the only limit is the number of tables I can put into a Database.
So, can you please advise if its possible to put in so many tables into a SQL database? Or is the Bekerley DB better?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2006
Hi,
Could somebody tell what is the maximum number of concurrent connections that are supported in sql server 2005 developer edition?
thanks
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2001
Hi,
I am reading SQL Server 2000 Black book (Coriolis publisher) and Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Optimization guide (Jenney Lynne Fields PH publisher).
In the Black book page 56, it says :"..up to a total of 16 instances.
In the optimization guide page 144, it says :"There is no theoretical limit to the number of instances of SQL server you can run simultaneously..."
Who the hell is right??????
Alain Gagne
Lead DBA
gagnea@msagroup.com
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 30, 1998
Hi all,
I take error 610 "Maximum number of databases that may be accessed by a
transaction is 8. This number has been exceeded by this query" when I
execute a SELECT query.
In this query there are about 12 sub-query.
How can I fix the problem?
Thanks in advance.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 1, 2005
Hi,
Can somebody let me know how many (maxi) no of users can be created to deal with MSDERelA ?
With kind regards,
Ashfaque
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
My db contains two table Employee_detail and Student_Detail.Employee_detail has Emp_id and Student_Detail has stud_id.Now my problem is that i want to get one maximum no from these two table.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 6, 2005
Is there an upper limit on the number of Conversation Timers?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2007
I need a small SQL server for up to 10 users. If I understand the EULAs and FAQs correctly, there is no limit on the number of users imposed by the SQL Server 2005 Express license. If so, then the number of users is only limited by the OS's license so all I need is SQL Server 2005 Express (free), Windows XP Pro (10 users limit) and no CALs for either Windows or SQL Server.
I'd be thankful if someone could verify this.
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2007
I am trying to setup transactional replication between Server A and Server B. There are 265 databases on each server.
I am running SQL Server 2005 on Windows Server 2003. The problem comes in at the 201st database. The message in the SQL Server Agent Error Log is :
Warning,[398] The job (WSSWPG09-EmpirePaint-WSSWPG06-104) has been queued because the maximum number of working threads (400) are already running. This job will be executed as soon as one of the working thread finishes execution.
SQL Server's max worker threads is set to 0. The Distribution, LogReader and T-SQL subsystems have been increased to 200 max_worker_threads.
Is there some other setting (maybe a Windows Registry setting) that can be configured to fix this? Or have I just hit a physical maximum of the processor?
Any help is much appreciated.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2007
I am upgrading from Access, where you can only have 10 fields in a primary key or unique index. Is this also the limit in SQL Server? If not, what is the limit?
Thanks for any help on this.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2015
I am adding a table within my vb.net program using New datatable(tblname) function, then adding 22 columns (col01 to col22) to this table using .columns.add (colname) function without any error.The program however throws an exception when trying to assign a value to column number 14 (col14) saying this column does not belong to table tblname. Assigning a value from col01 to col13 is working fine.Is there a limitation on number of columns can be added to a table using code?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2006
Good day to all
SQL Server 2000.
I have a problem with a piece of code, which updates some tables using transaction. This process brings the program to a halt when updating large files.
With smaller files, the process finishes without problems.
I have noticed that, if a comment out the "begin transaction" and respective "commit", the same code executes without problems, even when updating large files.
I suspect that there is a limit on the number of records a transaction can hold before a commit is issued. I am surprised however, that SQL Server halts, without messages or warnings.
Is this a configuration issue? If there is a limit on the number of records a transaction can hold, what is this limit:? Anything I can do to have a warning form SQL Server when a situation like this is reached (or indeed to avoid this situation) ?
Thank you in advance for any help
Cecil Ricardo
View 5 Replies
View Related
Mar 22, 2006
In MS Sql Server 2000, if you run a stored procedure that query's morethan 8 databases, you get this error gets raised:Maximum number of databases used for each query has been exceeded. Themaximum allowed is 8.In 2005, does this maximum number still exist? if so, is it still 8, orhas the number been increased?Thanks,Mike
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2005
I have a situation with a 6 server setup whereby merge agentswill not run if other merge agents are alreay running. Basicallywe have a 5 laptop, one tower config with the tower being thepublisher. In theory we want to be able to hook a laptop upand have it sync within, say, 5 mins. Trouble is, if agents forthe other laptops are running (trying and failing to connect becausethose laptops aren't connected) then the agents for the laptop that*is* connected won't run. It seems to be a 'maximum number of runningagents' issue. Is this is user defined setting, and if so where can I set it?Many thanks, sorry if this has been answered many many times before.Jim--Find me at http://www.ursaMinorBeta.co.uk"Brace yourself, this might make your eyes water."
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2008
I'm using 2 OLE DB Commands; 1 to perform an insert the other an update. I have found that on the column mapping tab, I only have 10 parameters available to map to. The issue is I need 40 parameters. Am I doing something wrong? Is there a setting I am missing? Is there another way to do this? Am I out of luck .
Here is the sql query I am using, so you can see that I have the correct number of parameters listed:
Insert into Reqs_Data (G_COLLECTDATE, PROGRAM, PRODUCT_ID, TOTAL, ADDED, CHANGED, DELETED, NOT_ALLOCATED, NEWREQS, MODIFIED, LEGACY, UNCATEGORIZED, NOT_TRACED_DOWN, NOT_TRACED_UP, PASSED, PARTIALLY_PASSED, WAIVED, FAILED, NOT_VERIFIED, PLANNED_ADDED, RQTS_TOTAL_TBD_COUNT, RQTS_TOTAL_MODS_IN_MONTH, BUILD_ID, RTM_PRODUCT_ID, TRACED_UP, TRACED_DOWN, ALLOCATED, LASTMONTHTOTAL, CALC_ADD, CALC_DELETE, IS_TRACED_DOWN, IS_TRACED_UP, LEVEL3, LEVEL2, LEVEL1, LEVEL0, IPT1, IPT2, IPT3, IPT4 ) Values(?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)
Update Reqs_Data SET TOTAL = ?, ADDED = ?, CHANGED = ?, DELETED = ?, NOT_ALLOCATED = ?, NEWREQS = ?, MODIFIED = ?, LEGACY = ?, UNCATEGORIZED = ?, NOT_TRACED_DOWN = ?, NOT_TRACED_UP = ?, PASSED = ?, PARTIALLY_PASSED = ?, WAIVED = ?, FAILED = ?, NOT_VERIFIED = ?, PLANNED_ADDED = ?, RQTS_TOTAL_TBD_COUNT = ?, RQTS_TOTAL_MODS_IN_MONTH = ?, BUILD_ID = ?, RTM_PRODUCT_ID = ?, TRACED_UP = ?, TRACED_DOWN = ?, ALLOCATED = ?, LASTMONTHTOTAL = ?, CALC_ADD = ?, CALC_DELETE = ?, IS_TRACED_DOWN = ?, IS_TRACED_UP = ?, LEVEL3 = ?, LEVEL2 = ?, LEVEL1 = ?, LEVEL0 = ?, IPT1 = ?, IPT2 = ?, IPT3 = ?, IPT4 = ?
WHERE G_Collectdate = ? AND Program = ? AND PRODUCT_ID = ?
View 5 Replies
View Related
