Top 100 Items Sold In The Last 60 Days Rank Tracking
Apr 14, 2006
I want to be able to track my top 100 items sold in the last 60 days. Each night I want to calculate it then compare it with the numbers from the previous night. Then show both ranks. My problem is assigning them ranks. Bascily I have a view that shows the top 200 sorted correctly. I am thinking creating a DTS to make a new table with adding transformations. But I am not sure how to code the Visial Basic. Below is what I thought it would be, but it doesn't work. Get a generic error. Any ideas?
dim ranknum
ranknum = 0
Function Main()
ranknum += 1
DTSDestination("Rank") = ranknum
DTSDestination("ItemNumber") = DTSSource("ItemNumber")
DTSDestination("QtySold") = DTSSource("QtySold")
Main = DTSTransformStat_OK
End Function
I am looking for a way to show how I can have a result set that shows a record with one item and the number of records where it was purchased or sold. Below is my sample data.
Use tempdb go create table #ItemLedgerEntry ( ENTRYNO INT NOT NULL , ITEMNO VARCHAR (50) NOT NULL , POSTINGDATE DATETIME NOT NULL , ENTRYTYPE INT NOT NULL
[code]....
I know something like this will give me results but I'd like to run one query.
select itemno, count(*) from #ItemLedgerEntry where entrytype = 0 group by itemno order by count(*) desc
I'm hoping someone can help me out with this. In order to add an sequence dimension in an ssas cube, I need to rank chronological item in a t-sql data set in order of their distinct appearance. I've tried to do this in mdx and there's just no easy way. I've also tried various ways in t-sql to achive, includeing ranking functions, custom udf, etc. To no avail.
So the "register" action would be the first thing a user did, "create_item_a" the second, create_item_b the third. However, the next occurrance of create_item_a would still retain the rank of 2 as it's not a new action for this user. The ranks would be unique to the actions, based on the first time they occurred.
This has been perplexing, but I feel like there is simple way to do this using some of the ranking functions, but just haven't been able to get it figure out.
CREATE TABLE OrderRanking ( OrderID INT IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, CustomerID INT, OrderDate date ) INSERT OrderRanking (CustomerID, OrderDate)
[Code] ...
Looks fine but what I need is DRP with this:
CustomerID OrderDate 'DRP taking care of the gap in the days' 1 '01-01-2015' 1 1 '01-01-2015' 1 2 '02-01-2015' 1 2 '02-01-2015' 1 2 '05-01-2015' 4 2 '05-01-2015' 4
I need to run a query on all of the items in the product table where the amount that I've sold over the past 2 days is greater than the amount I have available. Basically, am I likely to sell out of stock?
I have all of the information I need across 3 tables:
- bvc_product - bvc_order - bvc_orderitem
The database is available here: [URL] .... It's about 400 KB zipped & 3 MB unzipped.
I've written the following query & I can see all of the data that I need, but (even conceptually) I don't know how to make the comparison.
SELECT o.[ID] ,o.[TimeOfOrder] ,oi.[Qty] ,p.[ID] ,p.[AggregateQty] FROM [tmpDB].[dbo].[bvc_Order] o INNER JOIN tmpDB.dbo.bvc_OrderItem oi ON o.ID = oi.OrderID INNER JOIN tmpDB.dbo.bvc_Product p ON p.ID = oi.ProductID
I have a code I wrote and I'm required to get Product Name and Quantity with the maximum quantity sold per day. My issue is with the "per day" part, here's my code below.
Hi: I'm try to create a stored procedure where I sum the amounts in an invoice and then store that summed amount in the Invoice record. My attempts at this have been me with the error "The multi-part identifier "items.TAX" could not be bound"Any help at correcting my procedure would be greatly appreciate. Regards,Roger Swetnam ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[UpdateInvoiceSummary] @Invoice_ID intAS DECLARE @Amount intBEGIN SELECT Invoice_ID, SUM(Rate * Quantity) AS Amount, SUM(PST) AS TAX FROM InvoiceItems AS items GROUP BY Invoice_ID HAVING (Invoice_ID = @Invoice_ID) Update Invoices SET Amount = items.Amount WHERE Invoice_ID =@Invoice_IDEND
I am struggling to come up with a set-based solution for this problem (i.e. that doesn't involve loops/cursors) ..A table contains items (identified by an ItemCode) and the set they belong to (identified by a SetId). Here is some sample data:
SetIdItemCode 1A 1B 24 28 26 310 312 410
[code]....
You can see that there are some sets that have the same members:
- 1 and 10 - 2 and 11 - 7, 8 & 9
What I want to do is identify the sets that have the same members, by giving them the same ID in another column called UniqueSetId.
I'm having an issue creating a report that can group & sum similar items together (I know in some ways, the requirement doesn't make sense, but it's what the client wants).
I have a table of items (i.e. products). Â In some cases, items can be components of another item (called "Kits"). Â In this scenario, we consider the kit itself, the "parent item" and the components within the kit are called "child items". Â In our Items table, we have a field called "Parent_Item_Id". Â Records for Child Items contain the Item Id of the parent. Â So a sample of my database would be the following:
Item's 2 & 3 are child items of "Kit A", Item 5 is a child item of "Kit B" and Item 6 is just a stand alone item.
So, in my report, the client wants to see the SUM of both the kit & its components in a single line, grouped by the parent item. Â So an example of the report would be the following:
Name | Available Qty -------------------------- Kit A | 15 Kit B | 25 Item 4 | 100
Hello,I am writing a query to select records added to a table today, in the last 3 days, in the last 7 days, and so on.Here is what I have (which seems that its not working exactly). -- total listed today SELECT COUNT (*) FROM mytable WHERE DATEDIFF(Day, mydatecolumn, getdate() ) <= 0-- total listed yesterday SELECT COUNT (*) FROM mytable WHERE DATEDIFF(Day, mydatecolumn, getdate() ) <= 1-- total listed in the last 3 days SELECT COUNT (*) FROM mytable WHERE DATEDIFF(Day, mydatecolumn, getdate() ) <= 3I'd like to be able to select the count for records added within the last X number of days. Can someone please help me out? Thanks so much in advance.
SELECT[RANK] ,[KEY],idc.* FROMFREETEXTTABL (dbo.indice,mcaNombre,fabNombre,catNombre), 'ropa adidas nike', LANGUAGE 3082, 5) res left join dbo.indice idc with (nolock) on idc.idcCodigo=res.[key] ORDER BY [RANK] DESC;
Result:
RANK KEY 182 03 04 01
Why idcCods's 1 and 2 have different rank?? because idcCod's 3 and 4 affects ?? or it's just thinks of language??
Ok. Im not able to understand this logic please help. As you can see we have 2 columns of ranks, 1)normal 2)corrective. what is the logic behind this and how do u write a query for this? these ranks are for the Salary Column. Imran, "You truly do not know someone untill you fight them."-THE MATRIX.
EmpID Empname EmpSalary RankNormal RankCorrective 1 A 150001 1 2 B 100002 4 3 C 150001 1 4 D 40003 5 5 E 150001 1 6 F 15004 6 7 G 15004 6 8 H 5005 8
Hi All, Please let me know the equivalent of RANK() over ( order by...) in SQL server 2000. I thought this was supported in SQL server 2000. Please let me know if there exists a user defined function. Thanks in Advance.
I would like to write a query that gives me the values of a set ofobservations, and their rank.CREATE TABLE #Values(val int)INSERT #Values SELECT 1INSERT #Values SELECT 5INSERT #Values SELECT 10I would like to select this:1 10 -- rank 1, value 102 53 1I can put them into a temp table with an identity column, ordered bythe column I'm interested in, and then retrieve in order by theidentity column. I'm wondering if there's a way to do that with asubquery.Thanks,Jim
I've written a bunch of code using contains for fts. Then as I was trying to run the sorting, I realized that I have to use containstable in order to sort by rank. Is that correct? When I was using contains, I just used it as a where clause so I would have something like...
WHERE ((PostedUntil >= '5/22/2006') AND (SiteId=199)) AND (CONTAINS (PositionTitle, '"sales"') OR CONTAINS (Description, '"sales"'))
From the examples I've seen, in order to use containstable, I have to join a new dynamic table to the freetext enabled table and it only uses 1 containstable phrase for the new table. In my case, I may have multiple containstable phrases, so would they all fall in a () set like..
FROM Categories AS FT_TBL INNER JOIN (CONTAINSTABLE (table, col1, searchphrase) OR (CONTAINSTABLE(table, col2, searchphrase2) OR CONTAINSTABLE (table, col3, searchphrase3)) AS KEY_TBL
... or would each containstable have to be a new join? I don't want to spend anymore time going back and rewriting code just to test it since it's about a days worth of recoding. Thanks.
ive created a photo sharing site, and im trying to show the statisics for certain users, so far i can COUNT all the photos the user has upload, and show them in descending order, but i need to be able to see the ranking of the user, like :
until recently ive been using a rank equation to calculate rank,
essentially doing a select statement and selecting this as the rank field, where query 2 is the same as query 1:
((select count(*) from (query1) where (query1).value < (query2).value) +1)) as Rank
problem is that this is now running like a dog (takes 10 secs) and i'd like to try and do this another way- 2005 has a rank function, how can i do this in 2000?
here is the full statement :
SELECT StudentId, GCSE_Score, LTRIM(STR ((SELECT COUNT(*) FROM dbo.[Score2004-05] WHERE GCSE_score < s.GCSE_Score) + 1)) AS GCSE_Rank, SetId FROM dbo.[Score2004-05] S WHERE (SetId = '2004/2005')
I need help in understanding how the rank is calculated in FREETEXTABLE. I have a following query
select ft_tbl.saon ,ft_tbl.paon ,ft_tbl.street ,ft_tbl.postcode ,key_tbl.rank from temp as ft_tbl INNER JOIN freetextTABLE(temp, (saon, paon, street), '80 ridge avenue', 15) as key_tbl ON FT_tbl.ID = key_tbl.[key]
First, the resulting rows does have one record which has an address 80 ridge avenue but it appears at 15th place. Ideally it should appear on 1st. All the ranks of the results are same.
Second, the results are also showing two rows which does not contain the specified search string at all. They not only appears above in the resulting table but also have the same rank as the result in question (80 ridge avenue). For example result shows €œLong Ridges, Flat 21, Fortis Green€? at fifth place which is no way near the search string. And actual record shows up at 15th Place
Is there any way we can influence the rank to show exact match first. Just to clarify I have removed the digits from noise file as we need to search house numbers. Digits appears in noise file as default.
I have a report created and within the report is columns that perform additions on the fields from the database.
I want to create a rank column to show the rank of the row compare with the rest.
Col1 Col2 Total Ranks 1 2 3 3 2 3 5 1 2 2 4 2
On the above Col 1 and 2 would come form my database, Total is calculated by the report. How can I get ranking on this total? I cannot sort by the total as the report should only showing rankings but not be ordered by the rank.
I am using SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services...anny help is much appreciated.
(SELECT JumpHeight, DogIdent, MIN(RunDate) as "MinRunDate", COUNT(Event_ID) AS "NoEvents",
RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY JumpHeight ORDER BY COUNT(Event_ID) DESC, MIN(RunDate)) AS "HeightRank"
FROM EventData
WHERE Event=@Event
GROUP BY JumpHeight, DogIdent) AS xx, Dogs, DogOwner
WHERE (Dogs.Breed = @Breed AND xx.DogIdent = Dogs.DogIdent and Dogs.Owner_ID = DogOwner.Owner_ID) AND
(xx.HeightRank <= 10)
ORDER BY xx.JumpHeight, xx.HeightRank
produces this output:
Jump Ht.
Rank
# of Events
First Event
Owner
Call Name
08
3
1
2/19/2006
Some Owner
Otto
08
4
1
3/12/2006
Some Owner
Schotzie
I want it to produce this output:
Jump Ht.
Rank
# of Events
First Event
Owner
Call Name
08
1
1
2/19/2006
Some Owner
Otto
08
2
1
3/12/2006
Some Owner
Schotzie
I have tried several things and cannot correct the problem. Obviously, RANK is being evaluated in the wrong place, but placing it elsewhere has failed to produce the above results.
Hi,All, I have one table like this UserID,Name,GameScore 1 A 25 2 B 23 3 C 22 4 D 25 5 E 23 6 F 26 Now i want the query which return like this Name Score Rank F 26 1 A 25 2 D 25 2 B 23 3 E 23 3 C 22 4 Can anyone give me the sql 2000 query for this
In the Sql below, sample from William Pearson, the amount Spend is in descending order and the Rank number is in ascending order. Like this:
Spend Rank 24 1 12 2 10 3 9 4
What I wish to accomplish is:
Spend Rank (descending) 24 4 12 3 10 2 9 1
Please let me know what I need to accomplish it.
Thanks for the help
Victor
SELECT CompanyName, Spend, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ACC0704 AS CoSpendTotal WHERE ACC0704.Spend <= CoSpendTotal.Spend) AS Rank FROM ACC0704 ORDER BY Spend DESC
i want to create a report so that a list of the top 30 records are returned to the report user. In the report i want to have the records position in the list shown (ie the first row should have 1. and the second should be 2. right on down to the 30th having 30.)
i am trying to create a rank formula.i just need to return the highest MCC count for the mcc code and return the seller code...So eg row 3 and 4, there are two MMC CODE called 4772, i need the formula to return the seller code r10, this is because r10 has 9 counts against that mcc code, and r03 has 9,
WITH MEMBER [Measures].[Rank] AS 'Rank ( Product.CurrentMember,Order( {Product.CurrentMember.Parent.Children} ,[Profit], DESC) ) ' SELECT {[Profit] , [Rank]} ON COLUMNS, Drink.Children ON ROWS FROM Sales
I need to get the previous price for all my PROMOTION records but not when the previous record is a type PROMOTION also it needs to keep going back to get the price.
I have created a table with RANK in which works OK to get previous price for all but how can I say if previous price is type PROMOTION go to next previous prices...
Bets way to show an example is with a jpeg image I have but having trouble inserting into this message...
SELECT a.[StartPrice] ,a.[ProductID] ,a.[Colour] ,ISNULL(b.[Price],a.[Price]) AS [Price Before] ,a.[Price] AS [Promotion Price]
