Transact SQL :: BPA On A Cluster Using Default Instance And Static Port
Aug 25, 2015
Having problems running the BPA for 2012. We setup using a clustered environment, SQL Server installed using default instance, and a static port not 1433. When I try to run the BPA using the instance name it says it doesn't exist, and won't let me add a port number. However, if I use MSSQLSERVER as the instance name it runs with no port specified and returns results. I assume that it doesn't require a port because the default instance would pull from the Browser Service and the using MSSQLSERVER is the same as running the default on a standalone server. Are those assumptions correct?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Nov 3, 2015
I changed the Port of my named instance to use static port but still error log is giving two values ,why??
spid15sServer is listening on [ 'any' <ipv6> 50152].
spid15sServer is listening on [ 'any' <ipv4> 50152].
ServerServer is listening on [ ::1 <ipv6> 57518].
ServerServer is listening on [ 127.0.0.1 <ipv4> 57518].
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2015
Basically the question is, which number should I pick?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2007
Hi all. I have ran into a annoying situatin on sql cluster. Config is:
w2k3 EE x64 r2 - two nodes
sql 2005 x64 standart v2153
2instances, active-active cluster.
While changing tcp port configuration of one instance (using configuration manager) I have acidentaly created that setting:
- All IP dynamic port and All IP port was set to same number while separate IPs have enabled dynamic ports and does not have static port set.
This situation leads to unability of starting the instance anymore. There is no need wide explanation, its quite clear - while starting instace, it was configured with static port and with dynamic port with the same number, so port conflict error takes place. Problem was how to escape from this situation. On non clustered sql is quite easy, because these settings are stored in registry and also can be changed thorough Configuration manager, easy solution. Nor on the cluster.. Modifying the registry even on both nodes was unefective, every try to start instance fails with port conflict error and bad config was saved to registry again. I wasnt able to find where this config resides and change it to corect values. I have revealed only that it is not stored in instance master DB (restoring it from backup). Looks like its held somehow by cluster service itself, but I didnt find where it should be and how to edit it. So the last possible option take place (time was against me) - reinstalation of whole clustered instance. Nice example of how one click can create you a 2 days of work... Iam still interested if there is a smooth and easy way out of this situatin:-) So if anyone knows..... If there is not, I realy warn everybody.
DAvid
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2014
I installed a default SQL Server 2012 instance on Windows Server 2012.I enabled the SQL Browser and changed the TCP port of the instance to 1435. I changed port 1433 to 1435 I was able to connect to the instance using SSMS on another server. Now I have to enter Servername,1435 to make a connection.Why does the SQL Browser not resolve the servername to the right IP address and port 1435? Why am I not able to make a connection when I enter the servername or <servername>MSSQLSERVER? Is a SQL Browser only resolving named instances?This works fine for a named instance. Is there something special about default instances or the SQL Browser?
View 15 Replies
View Related
Apr 10, 2014
I ran the Advanced cluster preparation for a new sql instance on an existing cluster.
Slq Server 2012.
After is completed, it was successful, I realized I specified the wrong Instance Root directory.
Is it possible to remove what the preparation installed? Or is it possible to change the root directory?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2007
Hi, I have a task in hand to migrate (upgrade) from SQL2K named instance to SQL2K5 default instance. There are many intranet applications touching current SQL2K. I would like to perform this upgrade such that I don't have to touch any application code - meaning I don't have to change the connectionstring to point to new Default instance. How can I achieve this?
So, in otherwords, here is what I want to achieve:
Current Server: SQL2K: SERVER_AINSTANCE_A (named instance)
Upgraded Server: SQL2K5: SERVERB (default instance)
If I have both default, I could achive this by setting up DNS alias after migration done so that any call for SERVER_A would point to SERVER_B. But in my case, I don't have SERVER_A, I have named instance. Is there any solution?
Regards,
Vipul
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2002
Does anyone thing it is a wise thing to change the default port for SQL? Will this adversely affect the server? Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2001
I am trying to set up a Named Instance of SQL 2000 on the same machine that has a default instance of SQL 7.0. The setup always completes and I am able to register the Named Instance of the SQL Server with which it was installed on. However, when I try to connect the users to the database, with both windows and SQL authentication, I receive a SQL server not found error. I have tried an alias setup as well as physically specifying the port number in settup up an ODBC connection.
Has anyone ran into similar problems?
Also, has anyone been able to successfully complete the process as mentioned above?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 2, 2007
I have a server with sql server 2005 installed as the default instance -- I have a piece of software that needs SQL2000 to be the default instance. Is there a way other than install new sql2005 named instance and move databases to rename my SQL2005 instance from <machinename> to <machinename>sql05 for example?
Bryan
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 14, 2004
Thanks for Microsoft's Windows XP Service Pack 2 and Windows Server 2003 that make the security much stronger. However, besides the invisible benefit so far, I have become the victim of this security policy.
I have several named instances of SQL 7/2000 installed in my machine. They are not visible out of the Microsoft new fire wall. I need to access the instances from outside the fire wall, but I don't know which port I should open for the instances.
From SQL online, the default instance of SQL server is connected through TCP/IP by default port 1433. I could successful open that port and made the default instance visible to outside. However, the port 1433 doesn't work for the named instances. SQL online said, the port for named instance is dynamically (by default) chosen the first time the instance is started. So, actually, I have no way to know the port.
Is there anyway that I can check the database or somewhere to get the port that is used by the named instance?
Thanks for any input and recommendation.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 5, 2007
Hi all,I'm having some trouble with connecting to SQL server instance latelywithout adding a port number. I used to be able to always connect toinstance without having to input SQLSERVER,portnumber. However nowthis is not the case. I doing this through an ADO connection object,and creating the connection string. Does anyone know if there was arecent Microsoft update or patch that would've cause this to stopallowing me to connect to a SQL instance without having to put in theport information? Thanks.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2004
I am unable to access the default port 1433 on my SQL 2003 server. There is no firewall. I run telnet <ip> <port> and get "Connection failed" which explains my inability to connect to the server for weeks. I have being unable to connect to the server after I uninstalled sql 2000 and reinstalled it on my 2003 server. Some of the things I have checked is Network Configuration in EM. Named Pipes and TCP/IP is installed with port set to 1433. HKLMSoftwareMicrosoftMSSQLServerClientSuperSocketNetLibTcpDefaultPort port is set to 1433. Is there anything I need to configure on the server side to have the default sql server port enabled.
Thanks
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 1999
Hi, I'm supporting a SQL 6.5 application through a firewall & I'm new to NT & SQLServer.
What's the easiest way to find out what port SQL is listening on? It should be 1433 but
the NT guys say 1433 isn't in use. What's the easiest way to change the default port? A search through Books online talks about editing registry keys & I'd prefer not to do this if this can be avoided. Any tips would be appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2004
hai all,
I need to change the default port number of the SQL server from 1433 to some other port number. i know that it can be done thru SERVER NETWORK UTILITY. Can some one confirm that. It will be helpful.
Also i want to make sure that port to given is free port. how can i find that particular port is free.
Thanking in Advance, awaiting Quick response.
Signing Off
Venkatesh.V
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2015
SQL Server 2012 two node single instance cluster.
For DB access from application severs, do we need to open port (1433) for NODE IPs too ?
Or is it enough if we open the port 1433 only for VIRTUAL IP ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 23, 2005
Hello,I have SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition, and I'd like to change thedefault port to something else (we'll use 2033 for this example). I'vetried to connect from another computer on the same subnet using"ServerName:2033" as the server, but it doesn't connect. It will connect ifI change the Server to use the default port and change the server to connectto on the client to "ServerName", but either I"m not referencing the newport number properly or ????Any help you could provide would be great.Thanks In Advance!Rick
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2007
can any one guide me how to change the default port address of apache which is 80 to any other port number. coz the default port number is taken by iis also.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 24, 2006
I have SQL Server 2000 Standard Edition (sp3a) running on a windows 2003 (sp4) Server.
It is a Production Server with 3 NAMED Instances and NO Default Instance.
Does anyone know if I can rerun the SQL Server Install and add a DEFAULT Instance to this box without disrupting the other Named Instances???
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2007
I installed SQL Server 2005 recently on a cluster. I didn't go for the default instance and instead I named the instance option. Now I would like to migrate everything from the named instance to the default instance, which I haven't yet installed.
Is this an easy process? What about the logins and the maintenance plans and jobs? Is there anything else I need to be aware of?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2007
Hi
I've never had to do this, but when I downloaded the Web Workflow Approvals Starter Kit, it requested that I install the database into a User Instance of .SQLEXPRESS.
Now the problem is, I've installed it onto a default instance, so I was wondering whether you can create a named instance on top of a default instance... and if so, how would you do that?
Cheers
Chris
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2013
I have opened up a port on a remote SQL instance and can see that the port is LISTENING when using the PortQry tool. I have also set the TCP port in the TCP/IP properties in the IPAll section for that instance, yet I am unable to connect and get an error of
Connection Timeout Expired. The timeout period elapsed while attempting to consume the pre-login handshake acknowledgement. This could be because the pre-login handshake failed or the server was unable to respond back in time. The duration spent while attempting to connect to this server was - [Pre-Login] initialization=1; handshake=14998; (.Net SqlClient Data Provider)
I have done this on other instances, although they were default instances, and it has always worked fine.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jun 21, 2015
I have TWO named SQL Server instances (on the same machine) and I need to know the port of each of them, how can I do that? Is it write to check the following:
Which one to take: "TCP Dynamic Ports" or "TCP Port"? and what is the difference between them anyways?
Can the two instances (or more) on the same machine use the same port?!
View 12 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2007
I am unclear as to which Ip address to change the standard port on. When setting up a cluster you have multiple IP address's including the nic that is used for the heartbeat. I have not found any documention on how to change both nodes to listen on a port other than 1433..
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2014
I'm trying to configure a named instances of SQL Server 2012 SP2 to have specific IP addresses and listen to that IP on port 1433. Alongside this, I have the default instance running on a different IP and listening to that on port 1433.I've managed to get them configured so that they are reachable using the IP, and looking at the log for each they are listening correctly on that IP on port 1433; in addition, the default instance connects fine using the SERVERNAME.However, when I try and connect to the named instance using the SERVERNAME/INSTANCENAME syntax, I receive the following:-
"Cannot connect to SERVERINSTANCE.
Instance failure. (System.Data)"
Configuration for the TCP/IP protocol for that instance is as follows:-
Protocol Tab
Enabled= Yes
Keep Alive = 30000
Listen All = No
IP addresses Tab
IP1
Active = Yes
Enabled = Yes
IP Address = 10.1.1.1
TCP Dynamic Ports = 0
TCP Port = 1433
[code]...
The SQL Browser service is running and prior to switching off Listen To All, I could connect to the instance remotely using the instance name.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2015
I have a named sql instance on SQL 2012. The issue is that the clients is having problem connecting to it when the firewall is on, this is not consistent. The connection is fine when I disabled the firewall. When I turned the Windows firewall back on, it will work for awhile and it fails. I checked the SQL configuration manager and saw that a dynamic port is assigned to the named instance. I did put that in the firewall rule and unblock it. I also put TCP 1433 and 1434 as well as the browser service port, TCPUDP 2382 and it still didn't work.What is the best way to determine what port does the named instance are listening?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2007
Hi, I hope someone can help me! I changed the TCP port that the default instance of SQL 2005 x64 SP1 is listening on and now SQL server won't start as the port is being used - no problem I say to myself, I'll just change it again, however I can't!
My problem is that I can not change the TCP Port back again using Configuration Manager - no matter what values I put in, after a restart of the instance it comes up with this in the IP Addresses tab for TCP/IP Properties and SQL Server won't start:
IP1
Active Yes
Enabled No
IP Address aaa.bbb.ccc.111
TCP Dynamic Ports
TCP Port 0
IP2
Active Yes
Enabled No
IP Address aaa.bbb.ccc.222
TCP Dynamic Ports
TCP Port 0
IP3
Active Yes
Enabled No
IP Address aaa.bbb.ccc.333
TCP Dynamic Ports
TCP Port 0
IP4
Active Yes
Enabled No
IP Address 10.1.1.1
TCP Dynamic Ports
TCP Port 0
IP5
Active Yes
Enabled No
IP Address 127.0.0.1
TCP Dynamic Ports
TCP Port 0
IPALL
TCP Dynamic Ports 2020
TCP Port 2020
Interestingly, the ip address that the server is listening on aaa.bbb.ccc.444 is not reported in the list of IP addresses in the configuration manager for this instance, yet it is when I view the available IP addresses for the other two instances - is this significant?
I have tried failing to the other node, changing it there, changing it at the console and also while logged onto the the virtual machine remote desktop, rebooting both nodes, etc, etc. There are two other instances on this cluster that are still working fine but I hvae not attempted to change the TCP ports they listen on.
I used the same method to change this default instance as I did for a named instance on a similarly configured cluster and it worked fine. How to fix this?
Regards, Mike
2007-02-27 12:03:17.69 Server Server is listening on [ aaa.bbb.ccc.444<ipv4> 2020].
2007-02-27 12:03:17.71 spid9s Starting up database 'tempdb'.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.72 Server Error: 26023, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.72 Server Server TCP provider failed to listen on [ aaa.bbb.ccc.444<ipv4> 2020]. Tcp port is already in use.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.75 Server Error: 17182, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.75 Server TDSSNIClient initialization failed with error 0x2740, status code 0xa.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.75 Server Error: 17182, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.75 Server TDSSNIClient initialization failed with error 0x2740, status code 0x1.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.75 Server Error: 17826, Severity: 18, State: 3.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.75 Server Could not start the network library because of an internal error in the network library. To determine the cause, review the errors immediately preceding this one in the error log.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.77 Server Error: 17120, Severity: 16, State: 1.
2007-02-27 12:03:17.77 Server SQL Server could not spawn FRunCM thread. Check the SQL Server error log and the Windows event logs for information about possible related problems.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2015
connecting to a SQL Server Instance. I have a SQL server DB on a server having an Instance not running on the default port. Let's say ServerAInstanceA has the services exposed on Port 12345. When I'm trying to connect to ServerAInstanceA without specifying the port number, while I can connect from one client machine (ClientA), I am unable to connect from a different client machine (ClientB).On a side note, when I provide the port number, I can connect both from clients A and B. My question is, when I do not provide the port number, why is one client machine able to connect while the other isn't?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 27, 2007
I have a new named instance (SQL Server 2005 x64 SP2 (Build 3159) Developer edition) setup with dynamic port selection. A default instance was also running on the server prior to the named instance setup.
SQL Server Browser service is running. Remote connections are configured on the named instance. But still remote clients can only connect when the port number is specified after the instance name (servernameinstancename,9999). Without the port number, "error 26 - Error locating Server/instance specified" is thrown.
Doesn't the SQL Server Browser service eliminate the need for clients to specify the port number? What am I missing?
Thanks.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 26, 2015
Wanted to know about difference between cluster and non cluster index with example.
When to use cluster index and non cluster index .
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2007
The box I am trying to connect to is running two instances of SQL Server.
There is a SQL Server 2005 instance which is the default. There is a SQL Server 2000 instance which is named 'SQLSERVER'.
I can connect to the SQL Server 2000 instance no problem:<add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPCSQLSERVER;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" />
However, I am having trouble connecting to the Default SQL Server 2005 instance. I have tried:
<add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPC;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" />
but it doesn't work. I have tried explicitly setting SQL Server 2005 to use port 1434 (as SQL Server 2000 is running on port 1433), and then used:
<add key="ConnectionString" value="server=MYPC,1434;database=mydatabase;user id=****;password=****" />
but this doesn't work either.
Am I mssing something here? Any help much appreciated
Thanks...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2007
If you were asked to install SQL 2005 on a machine, would u install a default instance or a named one? And why would u choose one over the other?? Also, r there any issues with using a default instance?
Thank you for all your help.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2006
I'm using Delphi 2006 to create a DLL which will be integrated into SQL 2005. It's been a long road and I've made a lot of headway, however I am currently having the following problem creating the stored procedure:
My dll name is 'Crystal_Reports_Test_01'
In the DLL, my class is named 'Class01'.
In the DLL, my procedure is named 'TestMe'
I've managed to integrate the DLL into SQL using the following statement:
CREATE ASSEMBLY TEST_ERIC_01
AUTHORIZATION dbo
FROM 'c:mssqlassembliescrystalreports.dll'
WITH PERMISSION_SET = UNSAFE
I am attempting to create the stored procedure which points to the 'TestMe' method inside of the DLL. FYI: 'CrystalReports' is the namespace above my class that I had to add in order to get it to locate the class. The following code is used to create the stored procedure:
create procedure dbo.Crystal_Reports_Test_01(
@Parm1 nvarchar(255)
)
as external name TEST_ERIC_01.[CrystalReports.Class01].TestMe
But I get the following error:
Msg 6573, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Crystal_Reports_Test_01, Line 1Method, property or field 'TestMe' of class 'CrystalReports.Class01' in assembly 'CrystalReports' is not static.
I'm not sure what this means exactly. I think it means the method (the procedure) is not using Static method binding but should be. I have no idea what this really means or how to accomplish this in the DLL - or if I'm even going about this in the right way.
Any help would be appreciated ! I'll post the Delphi code (DLL) below.
Thanks,
Eric Gooden
library CrystalReports;uses System.Reflection, System.Runtime.InteropServices;...................type Class01 = class public procedure TestMe([MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)] var sVarString: wideString); export; end;procedure Class01.TestMe([MarshalAs(UnmanagedType.LPWStr)] var sVarString: wideString); export;begin sVarString:= 'Lets change the value and see if the stored proc. gets the change.';end;end.
View 4 Replies
View Related
