I have a scenario where the End User is going to select two parameters. @AgentID and @Location If the End User selects @AgentID parameter, in my WHERE clause, I do not want to check the location condition. By default, the agent knows their location already.
If the End User select @Location parameter, in my WHERE clause, I still want to check the Agent condition.
@AgentID parameter would populate either with "All" or their actual agent# (76754 for example).
@Location parameter would populate either with "All" or their actual location (Birmingham or Bessemer for example)Sample of my current WHERE clause:
WHERE
gl.ReceiptDate >= @BeginDate and gl.ReceiptDate < DATEADD(D,1,@EndDate) AND gl.AgentId = CASE WHEN @AgentID = 'All' THEN gl.AgentID ELSE @AgentID END AND gl.Location = @Location
I upload data from a Txt File(Txt_Temp) where I have VinNumber with 6 digits. Another table name Resrve_Temp1 where I have Vinumber with 17 digit. Now I need to update the vinnumber 6 digit to 17 digit or to new column in Txt_temp.
Txt_Temp - Table
I tried this code with no succes and only one row is updating
update Txt_Temp Set Txt_Temp.Vinnumber=dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin from dbo.R_ResrvStock inner join Txt_Temp on Right (dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin,6)=Txt_Temp.VinNumber
OR Add this code in view
Select dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin,R_Txt_Temp.Vinnumber,R_Txt_Te mp.Model_Code from dbo.R_ResrvStock inner join R_Txt_Temp on Right (dbo.R_ResrvStock.Vin,6)=R_Txt_Temp.VinNumber
I have used the below update query. However, its updating only the first value. Like its updating AB with volume when c.Type = ABC, similarly for CD. Its not updating based on the 2nd or the next case condition.
Update XYZ Set AB = a.Amt * (CASE WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN (c.volume) WHEN c.TYPE = 'DEF' THEN (c.volume) WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN (c.volume) Else 0 END), CD = CASE WHEN c.Type = 'MARGIN' THEN '4105.31' WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN '123.1' WHEN c.Type = 'DEF' THEN '234.2' WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN '567.1' END from table1 a join table2 b on a.Cust = b.Customer join table3 c on b.account = c.account and b.channel =c.channel
Why its not working properly? But if i use Select statement instead of update query its working properly.
I cannot seem to find the syntax to combine IN + CASE in a WHERE clause
WHERE ses.BK_MS_SESSION <= '2015-03' AND vis.CAT_DRAW_STATUS = (CASE ses.BK_MS_SESSION WHEN '2015-03' THEN vis.CAT_DRAW_STATUS ELSE CASE stat.BK_MS_VISIT_STATUS WHEN 'T' THEN 'X' ELSE vis.CAT_DRAW_STATUS END END ) IN ('D','R')
I have scenario where i have to pick one particular value from where condition. Here is the example:A store can have different types i-e A or B , A and B or either A or B.
Store Type Sales 11 A 1000 23 A 1980 23 B 50 5 B 560
I want to filter the store in "where clause" where
1)- if the store has type A and B, then assign only A 2)- if the store has type A associated with it then assign A 3)- if the store has type B associated with it, then assign B.
Select Store, sum(sales), Type from table1 where (TYPE]= (case when [TYPE] in ('A','B') then 'A' when [TYPE]='A' then 'A' else 'B'end)) GROUP BY [store], [TYPE]
The above statement is not working for when store has only Type B associated with it.
Here is the first part of a query for MySQL that I am trying to get working on MSSQL:
Code:
SELECT n.*, round((n.rgt-n.lft-1)/2,0) AS childs, count(*)+(n.lft>1) AS level, ((min(p.rgt)-n.rgt-(n.lft>1))/2) > 0 AS lower, (( (n.lft-max(p.lft)>1) )) AS upper FROM table n ...
But, I get this error message:
Server: Msg 170, Level 15, State 1, Line 3 Line 3: Incorrect syntax near '>'.
When I use the following SQL with the variable @CutOFFTID the second select statement query takes several minutes. If i run it replacing the value in the where clause with the acutal value of the variable it runs instantly.
DECLARE @CutOffTid int SELECT @CutOffTid = isnull(max(ccas_id),0) FROMdbo.fbs_trans (NOLOCK) print 'Cut Off ID is ' + cast(@CutOffTid as char)
DECLARE @MinPeriod int SELECT @MinPeriod = Min(period) FROM agr.dbo.atrans WHERE agrtid >@CutOffTid
I have a table Customer with column name "SerNo" the value of SerNo column is like below.
Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3 Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3 Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3 Metz-2d9c957d-ca1c-4b27-adf8-39fef552f3f7 Metz-2d9c957d-ca1c-4b27-adf8-39fef552f3f7 Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3
[code]...
I want to join it with nother table "Order" which has a SerNo column but does not have first part of SerNo.
With Sql Server Management Studio, while creating/modifying a table I want to specify one of its columns to store values in lower case only. Can it be done through the designer or by some other means?
ClaimNumTransactionDateUsername ClaimNum TransactionAmountUserName 2000074 20150209jerry.witt 2000074 -10000DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL 2000074 20150626DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL 2000074 -10000DATAFIX INSERTED ON 20150626 AT 162152493 LOCAL
[Code] .....
So,if we look at the result set, we notice 2 conditions where the IG_FinancialTransactionSummary.Username is like 'Data' and if we see the transaction date then sometimes that is the max transaction date or sometimes there are transactions that happened after but that doesn't have like '%data%' in username . So, i need to add a new column to my sql query which should basically verify if the username is like '%data%' and if that is the max(transaction date) or even if there are any transactions after that doesn't have like '%data%' then YES else No.
I need all [FRMDAT] field set to ‘12/31/2014’ in the MKLOPT table, where the [JOBCOD] in the VALUE list BELOW have a [FRMDAT] that is currently (greater than) > ‘12/31/2014’
VALUE LIST PH00059 PH02775 PH03051 PH03305 PH03336 PH03342 PH03371 PH03992 PH03993 PH03994
I am trying to use a date comparison in a statement using the year statement as well. Here is what I have:
Case [LastHireDate] When YEAR([LastHireDate]) < Year(@EndYearlyDate) then '12' When Month([LastHireDate]) = '1' then '12' When Month([LastHireDate]) = '2' then '11' When Month([LastHireDate]) = '3' then '10' When Month([LastHireDate]) = '4' then '9'
[Code] ....
When I am looking at it [LastHireDate] is showing that red line underneath. The < symbol has a red line and @EndYearlyDate has a red line. I can not seem to get them to clear and am, wondering what I am missing. When I execute the error comes up that it does not like the < sign in there.
I'm using sys.dm_fts_parser dynamic management function to tokenize a string of characters >4000. The function doesn't accept a query_string parameter >4000 characters. Is there a way around this? I've tried to execute the SELECT defined in the function but that doesn't work.
What happens when you add the Ignore Case flag into the mix?
I'm having a hell of a time - I'm dealing with an SCD situation using TableDifference component and I have both existing dimensions and new data coming in, each go through identical Case-Insensitive/Sort with remove duplicates, but I'm getting identical new and deleted records detected - I think because of ordering issues. I'm still trying to whittle the test case down, but I think data from all around the records I'm investigating seems to get sorted in between them, so I'm having trouble getting a small test case built.
I think the mixed case data is the root of the problem, and I think the design is bad, but before I go back to the technical lead, I need to understand enough to show that you cannot take two pipelines sorted and de-duped case-insensitively and then do a case-sensitive table difference operation.
how SQL 2012 would treat a literal string for a comparison similar to below. I want to ensure that the server isn't implicitly converting the value as it runs the SQL, so I'd rather change the data type in one of my tables, as unicode isn't required.
Declare @T Table (S varchar(2)) Declare @S nvarchar(255) Insert into @T Values ('AR'), ('AT'), ('AW') Set @S = 'Auto Repairs' Select * from @T T where case @S when 'Auto Repairs' then 'AR' when 'Auto Target' then 'AT' when 'Auto Wash' then 'AW' end = T.STo summarise
in the above would AR, AT and AW in the case statement be treated as a nvarchar, as that's the field the case is wrapped around, or would it be treated as a varchar, as that's what I'm comparing it to.
I have an sql script that has 2 main blocks of Where filter which I'd call as Filter1 and Filter2 as follows:
Select DisplayColumns... From InterestingTables Where (Filter1) --W1 AND --W2 NOT --W3 (Filter2) --W4
Note that Filter1 and Filter2 are composite filters (inner filters nested; it shouldn't matter as long as I have the outer parenthesis as above, right?). Now, say SetF1ExF2 is the result set of the sql script above. Additionally, let's say I obtain the result set SetF1 by having W2 to W4 commented out and SetF1AndF2 comes from commenting out W3. Shouldn't the following hold: SetF1AndF2 = SetF1 - SetF1ExF2 I am having a discrepancy between the values with SetF1AndF2 < SetF1 - SetF1ExF2.
I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?
I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....
I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.
Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?
The hex values will then be concatenated together and stored as a string (varchar). The application will handle the creation of the complex key
= ‘1BF714C8A0D4F699-4D2-F’
I am trying to argue against this approach and get them to store the values in their native form, in separate columns as a natural key.
To make matters worse, we need to use partitioning, where the partition boundary will be on a hexed datetime2(5) at weekly intervals. I was really hoping a proof of concept would show that hex string comparison could potentially put a row under a wrong partition, but so far, on an 8 million rowset, it is working fine.
For example, in the proof of concept, right partition boundary:
How is this working, given that the string lengths (varchar) are different and the row value contains dashes and the partition boundaries are smaller in length without dashes? How varchar string comparison is working here?
Using ADO 2.7, what is the best way to perform a case-sensitive filter? I have seen on other forums where folks have said that the StrComp function can be used inside of the .Filter method, but I haven't been able to get that to work. I am using VB 6 and ADO 2.7, and have a need to perform case sensitive filters. I know I am not the ony one who has needed to do this...
After trying every way I could come up with I can't get a filter clauseto work with a passed variable ...I have a cursor that pulls a filter string from a table (works OK),then I want to use that filter in a second cursor, but can't get thesyntax ...@bakfilter is equal to "MISV2_db_%.BAK" before I try to open and fetchfrom the second cursor. Here is the cursor declaration:DECLARE curFiles CURSOR FORSELECT FileName, FileDateFROM DataFileWHERE (((Active)=1) AND ((FileName) LIKE '@bak_filter'))ORDER BY FileDate DESCWhat do I need to do to get it to use the string contained in@bak_filter?Thanks in advance, Jim
I need to take all records from table @A where ID = 1. Also i need to process the records with datewise from table @A. Here is the table structure
DECLARE @A TABLE (ID INT, ACCOUNT VARCHAR(10), EFFDT DATE) INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'AAA','2015-10-01') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'BBB','2015-10-01') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'CCC','2015-10-01') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'AAA','2015-10-05') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (1,'DDD','2015-10-01') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'AAA','2015-10-02') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'BBB','2015-10-02') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'CCC','2015-10-02') INSERT INTO @A VALUES (2,'DDD','2015-10-02')
[code]...
how to achieve this in SQL query, i cannot use CTE or temp table as i need to use this code in another tool, it has to be single query, can use subquery or join would be better.
I have a set of udf's dealing that return a one column table of valuesparsed from a comma delimeted string.For example:CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[udf_filter_patient](@patient_list varchar(2000))RETURNS @patient TABLE(patient_id int)ASBEGINinsert into @patientselect patient_id from patient-- parse @patient_list stuff excludedRETURNENDI have come up with the following two schemes to use these udfs. Theseexamples are obviously simplified, and I have a handful of stored proceduresthat will use between 10 or more of these filters. If the two areequivalent, I prefer Method 2 because it makes for much neater SQL whenusing many filter criteria.So my question is, will one noticebly outperform the other? Or is there abetter way in which to filter on a list of criteria?Method 1 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASCREATE TABLE #patient(patient_id int)INSERT INTO #patientSELECTpatient_idFROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list )SELECT*FROMopen_billsINNER JOIN #patient on #patient.patient_id = open_bills.patient_idGOMethod 2 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASSELECT*FROMopen_billsWHEREopen_bills.patient_id IN ( SELECT patient_id FROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list ) )GOThanks for the help!Chris G
DECLARE @Teams AS TABLE(Team VARCHAR(3)) INSERT INTO @Teams SELECT 'IND' UNION SELECT 'SA' UNION SELECT 'AUS' select Team from @Teams where Team > 'AUS'
[code]....
co-relation between comparison operators in WHERE Clause and the respective output.
We have Merge Replication publications for SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition subscribers. Some articles have filter statements that send rows to multiple subscribers, based on the value of Host_Name() supplied at run-time.
Our publications work for most subscribers, but we have at least one subscriber who downloads too many rows from one of the filtered tables.
When we run the Select SQL from the article's Filter statement it returns the intended 4 rows for this subscriber. We cut and pasted the filter statement into query analyzer, substituted the subscriber's value for Host_Name(), executed the statement, and got the proper 4 rows for this subscriber in the results.
But when this subscriber syncs her Compact Edition database it downloads 10 rows - the proper 4 rows that the filter statement should pass, plus 6 other rows that she should not download. Our hypothesis is that the Filter statement is not properly applied to the article when this subscriber syncs. Other subscribers get the proper rows when they sync, so the publication's filter statement works in some cases, for some values of Host_Name().
We'd like to see the application of the filter statement at run-time (sync-time), but we have not found the text of the filter statement in SQL Profiler output. Should we expect to see the text of the filter statement in SQL Profiler output? Is there a better way to debug this error?
FYI, here's the text of the article filter statement:
SELECT <published_columns> FROM [dbo].[TBL_USER] WHERE user_sys_id in (
select u.user_sys_id
from tbl_user u
join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid
where t.terr_no_id like (
select
case (select t.data_access_qnty from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())
when 2 then (select t.terr_no_id from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())
when 3 then (select left(t.terr_no_id,5)+'%' from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = Host_Name())
end
)
)
And here's the statement we ran from Query Analyzer:
declare @id varchar(10)
select @id = 'aultnc'
SELECT * FROM [dbo].[TBL_USER] WHERE user_sys_id in (
select u.user_sys_id
from tbl_user u
join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid
where t.terr_no_id like (
select
case (select t.data_access_qnty from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)
when 2 then (select t.terr_no_id from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)
when 3 then (select left(t.terr_no_id,5)+'%' from tbl_user u join tbl_territory t on u.territory_gid = t.territory_gid where u.user_sys_id = @id)
I'm in need of a sql query that I'm not sure is possible. Here is anexample of how it's laid out.employee ID Job class Last Change Date12345 x 2/1/200412345 y 1/15/200412345 z 1/1/2004We know that this person is in job class 'x' because it's the mostrecent change. Is there a way to write a query that will exclude thelines 'y' and 'z' because they are currently incorrect?I would appreciate any help I could get. Thanks
