Transact SQL :: Dynamic Partition For Partitioning Table
Jul 31, 2015
I am new to Partitioning tables. My scenario is as listed below.
I am getting Monthly Transaction data on Every First Monday of the Month and I want to do partition for those data.
For Example: Let's say I will get my next monthly data on August 3rd 2015 which is First Monday of the month of August.
I want those Transaction data to go in new partitioned FileGroup in my existing partitioned table. How can I do partition for this kind of scenario ? Can we create one or multiple Stored Procedure which will create New Partition and load data in that partition ?
FYI, this monthly data will be loaded in Staging table and that table has LoadDate column which will have 2015-08-03 in it. I am using SQL 2012 Enterprise edition.
View 17 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
May 8, 2013
we planning to create partitioning on existing tables. The partitioning is on date column, there should be one partition for each year.
Creating of new partitions should be automated, and also we dont have any plans of archiving old data, all we want is that new partition creation should be automated.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2014
I need Dynamic Partition of SQL Table.
1. What is the best practice for partitioning (on date column)
2. The project on which i am working correctly have a case where in i get the update of my status flag after few days (Say 15 - 30) in that case if my data got into partition table how to update and how to search which partition has my data
3. Is creating partition occupies more disk space?
4. Is every partition would need index?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2007
I would like to partition a table having only items posted in the last 24 hours in one filegroup and all others in another. Is there a way that my partition function could contain something like "col1 >= dateadd(d,-1,getdate())" and have items move to the secondary filegroup as they age pst 24 hours?
Thanks
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2008
Hi,
I am trying to partition the table i have into 10 partitions based on the last digit of the employee ID.
The following is the logic I tried to use but was not successful.
Code Snippet
CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION PartitionRange (INT)
AS RANGE LEFT FOR VALUES (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8)
CREATE PARTITION SCHEME PartitionScheme AS
PARTITION PartitionRange
ALL TO ([PRIMARY])
create TABLE PartitionedTable
(
counter INT ,
string CHAR(8000) ,
EmpID INT,
UpdateDate datetime
)
ON
PartitionScheme (EmpID % 10)
Any suggestions on how I can make the logic work as required.
Thanks in advance.
With regards,
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 9, 2015
I have a non-partitioned table (TableToPartition) and I want to apply an existing partition scheme (PartSch) to it using a query. I didn't find any option so I used the StorageCreate Partition wizard to generate the script.why this clustering magic needed if it is dropped at the end? Isn't there another way without indexing to partition a table, say something with ALTER TABLE? (SQL Server 2012)
BEGIN TRANSACTION
CREATE CLUSTERED INDEX [ClusteredIndex_on_PartSch_635694324610495157] ON [dbo].[TableToPartition]
(
[ID]
)WITH (SORT_IN_TEMPDB = OFF, DROP_EXISTING = OFF, ONLINE = OFF) ON [PartSch]([ID])
DROP INDEX [ClusteredIndex_on_PartSch_635694324610495157] ON [dbo].[TableToPartition]
COMMIT TRANSACTION
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2015
I tried to create a dynamic table, fill in it and return it as recordset. The codes as this:
Declare @tbl Table(id int, name varchar(100), age int)
Insert Into @tbl(id, name, age)
Values(1, 'James, Lee', 28),
(2, 'Mike, Richard', 32),
(3, 'Leon Wong', 29)
Select * From @tbl Order By age
It works well in "SQL Query Ananizer". But return no records in ASP page.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 27, 2015
We are currently developing an OLTP application, which will need to purge data when it becomes older than 1 hour.Rather than having a process which deletes rows periodically (and risks locking the tables), I am considering using partitioning on a rolling 15 minute window.The idea is to have 5 active partitions, with the 5<sup>th</sup> one being swapped out, merged and a new one split in. This will allow data to live to a max of 1 hour 15 mins,which is acceptable.
Actually, I will have 8 partitions; there will be 4 partitions set in the future, just to ensure when the last partition is split, there isn’t any data movement, as the newest partition will be empty.I am wondering if there will be any performance issues due to partition swapping, merging and splitting every 15 minutes? The application will have a high volume of users when live. I think this should be a better option that continually deleting from the tables.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Oct 22, 2015
Our dev team wants to introduce a complex key, which is made up of
EventDate datetime2(5) = ‘2015-10-22 10:19:59.12345’
ConsumerID bigint = 1234
SiteID tinyint = 15
EventDate will be converted to a bigint and then to a hex value
= 2015-10-22 10:19:59.12345 = 2015102210195912345 = 1BF714C8A0D4F699
ConsumerID will be converted to a hex value
= 1234 = 4D2
SiteID will be converted to a hex value
= 15 = F
The hex values will then be concatenated together and stored as a string (varchar). The application will handle the creation of the complex key
= ‘1BF714C8A0D4F699-4D2-F’
I am trying to argue against this approach and get them to store the values in their native form, in separate columns as a natural key.
To make matters worse, we need to use partitioning, where the partition boundary will be on a hexed datetime2(5) at weekly intervals. I was really hoping a proof of concept would show that hex string comparison could potentially put a row under a wrong partition, but so far, on an 8 million rowset, it is working fine.
For example, in the proof of concept, right partition boundary:
= '1BF398D53DFA1800'
(2014-12-15 00:00:00.00000)
contains rows
= '1BF3983242B9C000-1-2'
(2014-12-08 00:00:00.00000-1-2)
Through to
= '1BF398C373960580-2FAF3003-2'
(2014-12-14 23：59：00.00000-800010243-2）
The prior partition boundary is 1
= 'BF3983242B9C000'
(2014-12-08 00:00:00.00000)
How is this working, given that the string lengths (varchar) are different and the row value contains dashes and the partition boundaries are smaller in length without dashes? How varchar string comparison is working here?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2015
I don't know why this is so difficult. What I want to do is take a table name as a parameter to build a query and get an integer value from the result of the query. But from all of the research I have been doing, Dynamic SQL is bad in SQL server because of SQL Injections. But my users are not going to be supplying the table names.
Things I have learned:
- SQL Functions cannot use Exec to execute query strings.
- SQL Functions can return a concatenated string that could be used by a stored procedure to Exec the query string.
So how can I write a stored procedure that will
1. take a parameter
2. Pass the parameter to a function that will return a string
3. Execute that string as SQL
4. Get a return value from that SQL statement
5. Then finally, from a View, how can I pass a parameter to the stored procedure and get the returned value from the stored procedure to be used as a field in the View?
Numbers 3, 4, and 5 are where I am really stuck. I guess I don't know the proper syntax and limitations of SQL Server.
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 13, 2015
I have a question regarding the dynamic sql. I have a script which which deletes all the foreign keys and re- creates it. So, I have created a table instead of a temp table. Now I need to create that foreign keys table in such a way that in which ever database I run the script, this foreign keys table should be created in that particular database.
For example:
IF OBJECT_ID('tempdb..keys','U') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE keys
CREATE TABLE keys.[@sourceserver],[@database]. (RowId INT PRIMARY KEY IDENTITY(1, 1),
ForeignKeyConstraintName NVARCHAR(200),
ForeignKeyConstraintTableSchema NVARCHAR(200),
ForeignKeyConstraintTableName NVARCHAR(200),
ForeignKeyConstraintColumnName NVARCHAR(200)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2015
I want to use column name to be join another tables.
I have invoice table to store detail of invoice and post some column ' s record to another table .
Invoice table
Invoice_Name | Invoice_Amount | Invoice_Vat | Invoice_Total
Inv001 | 1000 | 70 | 1070
Account_table
Account_No | Account_Number | Data_Source
JV001 | 1111 | Invoice_Amount ---->1000
JV001 | 1112 | Invoice_Vat ----> 70
JV001 | 1113 | Invoice_Total ----> 1070
I want to join Invoice table to Account_table
ON Invoice_Amount , Invoice_Vat , Invoice_Total with Data_Source
The way i got so far I unpivot Invoice table column into row and join with Account_table .
The problem is , if the column in Invoice_table are created , I must used dynamic columns to do this in sql query.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 18, 2015
I am trying to insert different number of columns into variables. This is what it does If I use a static columns.
declare @AccountType nvarchar(10)
declare @Total numerical(15,2)
declare @1 numerical (15,2)
declare @2 numerical (15,2)
declare @3 numerical (15,2)
#MonthtoDate temp table is created using a dynamic pivot query.
Data looks like this :
Account Type 1 2
3 Total
Type 1 3
0 4 7
Type 2 5
7 1 13
Select @AccountType = AcctType , @Total = MonthToDate, @1 = [1], @2 = [2], @3 = [3] from #MonthtoDate
However the issue is with [1],[2],[3] columns. Those are the number of days of the month. If today is the 3rd day of the month, we only need to show 3 days. So the final table has column [1],[2],[3] and @AccountType and @Total .
We want to run this query everyday to get the moth to date values.If we run this tomorrow, it will have 4 date columns [1], [2],[3],[4] and @AccountType and @Total .
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2015
If I have the first two columns from a SQL query and would like to create the third (row):
personid new_commsstream row
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 0 1
1 1 2
1 0 2
2 0 1
3 0 1
4 0 1
5 0 1
5 1 2
5 1 3
Is this possible? I have tried using row over partition but I'm not sure how group it correctly, so basically every time there is a new 1 in new_commsstream within a personid the row number goes up by one.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2015
I have the following query
WITH summary AS
(SELECT tu.SequenceNumber,
tu.trialid,
tu.SBOINumber,
tu.DisplayFlag,
[Code] ....
I am having trouble with the RowNumber Over Partition By portion of the query. I would like the query to return only the first occurrence of each sboinumber in the table for each trial id. It is only giving me the first occurrence of each sboinumber. I tried including the trialid in the partition by clause, but that is not working.
Sample Data
SequenceNumber TrialID SBOINumber
1 1 5000
2 1 5000
3 2 5000
4 2 5000
5 1 5001
6 3 5001
7 3 5001
Should return SequenceNumber 1 and 3, 5, 6
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 22, 2015
I am trying to spilt records into days by the start - End datetime.
I would send an image and data but because I am new to the forum, I am blocked sending images.
"Body text cannot contain images or links until we are able to verify your account"
How I can forward an image.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Jul 28, 2015
I’m looking for clearity on partition switching. The idea is to use many BULK INSERT statements into table dbo.X_n in parallel and when BULK INSERT for table dbo.X_n is completed, switch dbo.X_n into dbo.bigdaddy. I think this is the fastest way to upload a couple hundred GB of data.
In learning about partition switching (in part) from The Data Loading Performance Guide under Partition SWITCH, I hear the instructions to say copy the main table exactly to become a target. But in that same step (#1), I read that we need to change the default file group of the target (dbo.X_n) from the default file group. Then it says I need to match indexes and lists the filegroup as something we need to match with the main table.
As an overview of the partition switching strategy, I think the whole point of BULK INSERT with partitioning is to have seperate files (in same group) to enable concurrent uploading where each table has its own file. Once the upload is completed to a table (dbo.X_n) then we do the partition switch into the main table (dbo.bigdaddy). The data we just uploaded doesn’t actually move, just the metadata for it.
When I read the instructions linked above, I hear “Don’t have the same filegroup on your target as the main table. You must have the same filegroup on your target as the main table.”
Where am I disconnected?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 7, 2015
I have a requirement of table partitioning. we have 10 years of data on a table which is 30 billion up rows on 2005 server we are upgrading it to 2014. we have to keep 7 years of data. there is no keys on table or date column. since its a huge amount of data and many users its slow down the process speed. we are thinking to do partition on 7 years for Quarterly based. but as i said there is no date column on table we have to use reference table to get date. is there a way i can do the partitioning with out adding date column on table? also does partition will make query faster?
I have think three ways to do it.
1. leave as it is.
2. 7 years partition on one server
3. 3 years partition on server1 and 4 years partition on server2 (for 4 years is snapshot better?)
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 27, 2008
i have a table named "user" in which user which are located at different places within a city are recorded.
i want to group user with respect to there location like users of northern region are recorded first then users of western region and so on.
tell me from horizontal and vertical partitioning wh technique is better or i should use some other technique.
thanks for ur consideration.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2000
Hi,
I want to know more on table partitioning.I do not know where to get the right info.from.
I have a doubt - if a table is partitioned horizontally how does a query identifies where to pick up the data from i.e. from which part of partitioned table?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 16, 2008
i want to partition a table containing about 3 million rows. The partition column will be of datetime type.
following is the partition function i have used
create partition function MyPartFun
(datetime) as range left for values ('07/30/2007','09/30/2007','11/30/2007','01/30/2008','04/30/2008')
following is the partition scheme i have used
create partition scheme PartScheme as
partition MyPartFun all to ([primary])
i know how to add partition column while creating the table
But dont know how to add above partition scheme to an already populated table
Plz help...
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2007
Hi,
I have a database created using Enterprise Manager Wizard.
For example datafile db1_data.mdf and log file db1_log file exists.
All the tables are created in datafile db1_data.mdf.
Now to improve performance I want to implement table partitioning.
Can anybody tell me howto implement it with existing strutcure.
Suppose there is table Mytable in which all update and delete actions are performed regularly.And it contains about 10,0000 records.
I want to partition the table so that it contains 5000 records.
Solution with example highly appreciated.
Satish
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2007
Hi Experts,
I am new to Table Partitioning, Can any body guide me how to do table partitioning?
any way here is my scenario, we are having one database called "DATA" in SQL 2000 server and we have migrated to SQL 2005 by using backup and restore. and "DATA" is having about 15 tables and they are very very very big in size. and they dont have any index on a coulum name "DATETIME", but i want make table partition according to that perticular field "DATETIME" and right present we are having 6 months of data.
So, how to proceed further?
Your help will be appreciable..
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2007
i am trying to partition an sql table in sql server 2005, i created the partition schema and the data files that i want the data to be filled in after the partition. After the partition is finished sql gave me partition is successful , but i noticed that the size of data files i created has not increased and their sizes are the same.
notice: i have a clustered index on this table, so i dropped this index and recreated it
Bellow the script that i am using
and thank you for your help in advance
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2008
Hello frnds....what does mean by this ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 11, 2006
Hello,
I have a Sql Server 2005 database with many tables, each with millions of records within them.
They all have a Receive Date field, with records going back 10 years or so.
What would be the best way to partition it? I was thinking of partitioning them by years, but that would give me 10+ partitions -- would that be alot of overhead?
~Le
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2007
Hi folks! I'm looking for advice on partitioning a large table. In the DDL below I've changed names to protect the guilty.
My table has this schema:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[BigTable]
(
[TimeKey] [int] NOT NULL,
[SegmentID] [int] NOT NULL,
[MyVal] [tinyint] NOT NULL
) ON [BigTablePS1] (TimeKey) -- see below for partition scheme
alter table [dbo].[BigTable] add constraint [PK_BigTable]
primary key (timekey asc, SegmentID asc)
-- will evaluate whether this one is needed, my thinking is yes
-- based on the expected select queries.
create index NCI_SegmentID on BigTable(SegmentID asc)
The TimeKey column is sort of like a unix time. It's the number of minutes since 2001/01/01, but always floored to a 5 minute boundary. so only multiples of 5 are allowed.
Now, this table will be rather big. There are about 20k possible SegmentIDs. For every TimeKey from 2008/01/01 to 2009/01/01 (12 months), I'll have on the order of 20000 rows, one for each SegmentID.
For the 12 month period, there are 365*24*60/5=105120 possible TimeKey values. So the total rowcount is over 2 billion. (20k * 105120)
Select queries are expected to be something like this:
-- fetch just one particular row...
select MyVal from BigTable
where TimeKey=5555 and SegmentID=234234
--fetch for a certain set of SegmentID and a particular time...
select
b.SegmentID
,b.MyVal
from BigTable b
join OtherTable t on t.SegmentID=b.SegmentID
where b.TimeKey=5555
and t.SomeColumn='SomeValue'
Besides selects, also I need to be able to efficiently issue update statements against the table with new values in the MyVal column based on a range of TimeKey values (a contiguous span of a few days) and sets of about 1000 SegmentID. updates would always look like this:
update t
set t.MyVal=p.MyVal
from BigTable t
join #myTempTable p on t.TimeKey=p.TimeKey
and t.SegmentId=p.SegmentId
where #myTempTable would have order of 1000*24*60 rows in it, all with contiguous TimeKey values, and about 1000 different SegmentID values. #myTempTable also has a clustered pk on (timekey asc, SegmentId asc).
After the table is loaded, it would never get any inserts or deletes. only selects and updates.
Given the size, and the nature of the select and update queries, this table seems like a good candidate for partitioning. I'm thinking it makes sense to partition on TimeKey.
So my question is, is it stupid to create a separate partition for each day in the year long span of TimeKeys this table covers? That would mean 365 partitions in the partition function and partition scheme. Something like this:
CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION [BigTableRangePF1] (int)
AS RANGE LEFT FOR VALUES
(
3680640 + 0*1440, -- 3680640 is the number of minutes between 2001/01/01 and 2008/01/01
3680640 + 1*1440,
3680640 + 2*1440,
3680640 + 3*1440,
...snip...
3680640 + 363*1440,
3680640 + 364*1440,
3680640 + 365*1440
);
GO
CREATE PARTITION SCHEME [BigTablePS1]
AS PARTITION [BigTableRangePF1]
TO
(
[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY],
...snip...
[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY],[PRIMARY]
);
GO
does anyone have any experience with partitioned tables with so many partitions? Is a few hundred partitions too many? From my understanding of partitions, seems like having so many will be ok. Is it somehow worse than having hundreds of tables in a database?
Even with one partition for each day, I'll still have 24*60*20000/5 ~ 5m rows in each one.
5m seems like a manageable number. 2b does not.
elsasoft.org
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2007
Hi!I have a question:I already have a DB that uses partitions to divide data in USCounties, partitioned by state.Can I use TWO levels of partitioning?I mean... 3077 filegroups and 50 partition functions that addressthem, but can I use another function to group the 50 states?Thanks!Piero
View 15 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2007
We had data in tables for multiple users (Logins) .Each user data is identified by a one column named USER?. No user has direct access to tables and only through views .we have created views and stored proc .Views will perform DML operations on tables using condition WHERE USER=SUSER_SNAME() (i.e Logged in user).So no point of getting others user data.
Each table has a column USER and we are queering data based on login user .this is the foreign key of USER table. Each view contains user column in where clause .So for every query we are searching all records .instead of that is there any way to get data with out searching all records.
I heard about table Partitioning, index Partitioning, view Partitioning. Are they helpful to boost my query performance?
And also let me know is there any good way of designing apart from above options
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 10, 2006
Hi,
I have the following doubt about table lockinglocking in case of partitioning:-
Say we have 5 partition on the table Employee on the key Joining_Date and when we run 5 select queries on each of the parition in parallel will there be locking on the table when the 1st query is running or all the 5 queries can run in parallel. Basically, I am trying to see if parallelism and partitioning can work in sync or there will be locking at the table level if I don't specify any query hints?
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Ritesh
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2007
Conrad writes "I'm currently working on Table Partitioning. I have done everything succesfull for partitioning, what I'm struggling with is to use
" SELECT MAX(NAME) from sys.filegroups WHERE NAME NOT LIKE 'PRIMARY' " to get the last used FileGroup. Now this works just fine, but when I run the following script:
--Decalre variables
DECLARE @LastFilegroupName VARCHAR(50)
DECLARE @FilegroupName VARCHAR(50)
--Retuns the next FileGroup to be used
SET @LastFilegroupName = (select MAX(NAME) from sys.filegroups WHERE NAME NOT LIKE 'PRIMARY')
SET @LastFilegroupName = Replace(@LastFilegroupName,'FileGrp','')
SET @FilegroupName = 'FileGrp' + CAST((@LastFilegroupName + 1) as varchar(10))
--Alter database statement
ALTER DATABASE VadivelTesting
ADD FILEGROUP @NewFG_Name
This script gives the following error "Incorrect syntax near '@NewFG_Name'."
When I give it a static name it works fine, but not with the variable.
Please can someone help me, I'm in struggeling with this one."
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2006
Is there any benefit in creating seperate file groups for a partitionedtable on a multi-processor server with RAID5 and 1 Logical Drive?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 30, 2015
In our environment we have some "Huge" tables with around 2 million records. Planning to implement table partition.We have 4 LUN's.
View 3 Replies
View Related
