Please refer to the below query. I want to filter inner join rows based on outer query column value (refer to bold text).
SELECT M.MouldId, SI.StockCode, MI.Cavity, MI.ShotCounter, CQ.SumOfCastedQty  as CastedQty, MI.CounterStartupÂ
FROM Â Â Â Â MouldItem MI
JOIN (SELECT JD.MouldId, JC.StockCode, SUM(JS.CastedQty) AS SumOfCastedQty
FROM JobCasting AS JS INNER JOIN JobCreationDet AS JD ON JS.JobDetId = JD.Uniid INNER JOIN JobCreation AS JC ON JD.JobIdx = JC.Uniid
I have to join two tables and i need to fetch All records from @tab2 and only max date record from @tab1 that ID is present in Tab2
1.) @Tab1 have multiple records for each ID
2.) @Tab2 also have multiple records for each ID
3.) Kind of Lef Outer join those tables with ID and take all records from @tab2 and only Max of date from @tab1 and order by ID and Date
Note: @Tab1 always have lesser dates than @tab2 for each ID
Tables looks like as followsÂ
declare @tab1 table (id varchar(3), effDt Date, rate int) insert into @tab1 values ('101','2013-12-01',5) insert into @tab1 values ('101','2013-12-02',2) insert into @tab1 values ('101','2013-12-03',52)
[code]....
In the given ex, ID 103 should not come as it is not present in @tab2, ID 104 should come even it is not present in @tab1 as we ahve to use left outer join Result should like follows.
Is there a way to define a query-filter (Example: WHERE column1 > 5 AND column2 = 'value') in a function?
So I can create a query like this:
SELECT *  FROM Table  WHERE MyFunction()
I know it's a bit of a strange question, but I'm writing a dynamic software that will have the ability to run Stored Procedures on any database to create some data-checks. Through parametrisation, a user can define for a specific Stored Procedure that some results are no longer necessary in the result-set.
Example: ID - Name - State 1 - Jozef De Veuster - Mad 2 - Piet Husentruut - Not Happy 3 - Jeroen Meus - Angry
Is the result of a Stored Procedure "Show_me_unhappy_persons". But we already know that Jozef De Veuster is ALWAYS Mad, so a user can say: Exclude ID = 1, so it won't appear anymore in the result.
I want to handle this by doing:
SELECT * FROM PeopleStates WHERE --Some stuff-- AND CheckUserExclusions(SomeID) And CheckUserExclusions will translate to "NOT (ID = 1)"
I have a query that based 2 tables. I wrote a query with a left join on the base table but the result set returns multiple rows for each occurrence in the second table because of the left join. I want but to return all records from on table A and only matching records from table B which id but I would wan tit to keep return them vertically as the because it make it difficult to read when put in a spreadsheet. It want it to return the values horizontally so the rows are not increasing for each occurrence on table b.
Current ResultSet ------------------ ColA ColB TEST1 111 TEST1 222 TEST2 333 TEST3 444 TEST3 555
I am currently outer-joiing two tables to retrive some data in the above format. My intent is to modify the query so I can retrive the data in below fashion.
I have a table (edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2) of 40,000 MA_NUM. Â
I want to find occurrences of those specific MA_NUM in another table (edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE) with specific attributes (CONTRACT_NUM = '593' and TRANSACT_STATUS_CD = 'D'). Â
When I run the query below it returns 4 million rows. Â How can I write a query that will return the 40,000 MA_NUM (in edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2) with the sum total of MA_PAID_AMT associated with each?
SELECT edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.MA_NUM, Â Â Â Â edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.MA_PAID_AMT FROM Â edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE Â Â Â Â JOIN edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2 Â Â Â Â Â ON edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.MA_NUM = edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2.MA_NUM WHERE Â edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.CONTRACT_NUM = '593' Â Â Â Â AND edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.TRANSACT_STATUS_CD = '
I am using stored procedure to load gridview but problem is that i am not getting all rows from first table[Â Subject] on applying conditions on second table[ Faculty_Subject table] ,as you can see below if i apply condition :-
Faculty_Subject.Class_Id=@Class_Id
Then i don't get all subjects from subject table, how this can be achieved.
Sql Code:- GO ALTER Proc [dbo].[SP_Get_Subjects_Faculty_Details] @Class_Id int AS BEGIN
I have 4 tables (SqlServer2000/2005). In the select query, I have FULL JOINED all the four tables A,B,C,D as I want all the data. The result is as sorted by DDATE desc:- AID BID BNAME DDATE DAUTHOR 1 1 abcxyz 2008-01-20 23:42:21.610 c@d.com 1 1 abcxyz 2008-01-20 23:41:52.970 a@b.com 1 2 xyzabc 2008-01-21 00:17:14.360 c@d.com 1 2 xyzabc 2008-01-20 23:43:17.110 a@b.com 1 2 xyzabc 2008-01-20 23:42:43.937 a@b.com 1 2 xyzabc NULL NULL 2 3 pqrlmn NULL NULL 2 4 cdefgh NULL NULL Now, I want unique rows from the above result set like :- AID BID BNAME DDATE DAUTHOR 1 1 abcxyz 2008-01-20 23:42:21.610 c@d.com 1 2 xyzabc 2008-01-21 00:17:14.360 c@d.com 2 3 pqrlmn NULL NULL 2 4 cdefgh NULL NULL I want to remove the duplicate rows and show only the unique rows but contains all the data from the first table A. I have to bind this result set to a nested GridView.
I am using stored procedure to load gridview,i want to show row specific values in coloumns , as i an working on daily timetable of college and There are three tables Week_Day,Daily_Timetable & Subject.Daily_Timetable has data which has week_day,class_id,Subject_id,Period_No.
Each day has 6 periods and each period is mapped with subject in daily timetable.From below sql i am getting 6 rows of monday.
But i want to show in a row weekname,period1_subject_id(Period_No=1),period2_subject_id(Period_No=2),period3_subject_id.......upto period6_subject_id.
Please see my query below:-
SELECT   Week_Day.Week_Day_name, Subject.Subject_Code,  Daily_Timetable.Period_No FROM     Week_Day LEFT JOIN            Daily_Timetable ON Week_Day.Week_Day_Id = Daily_Timetable.Week_Day_Id and Daily_Timetable.Class_Id=6  LEFT JOIN            Subject ON Daily_Timetable.Subject_Id = Subject.Subject_Id order by  Week_Day.Week_Day_Id ,Daily_Timetable.Period_No
I have a query that returns material(items) that are used in an event on a certain day.
SELECT C.categoryName, count(I.itemID) AS InMission from items as I RIGHT JOIN Categories AS C on I.categoryID = C.categoryID INNER JOIN LinkMissionItem as LM on I.itemID = LM.itemID INNER JOIN Missions as M on LM.missionID = M.MissionID where '2015/12/19' BETWEEN M.freightLeave and M.freightReturn AND isReturned = 0 GROUP BY C.categoryName, C.categoryID ORDER BY C.categoryID
There are a total of 20 categories and I would like all the categories listed in the result even though there are no items booked in a mission. At the moment, I can only get the categories that have items in that category booked in a mission. I hoped that the RIGHT JOIN on the categories table would do the trick but it doesn't.
I have 3 tables: Â TABLE [dbo].[Tbl_Products]( [Product_ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL, [Product_Name] [nvarchar](50) NOT NULL, [Catagory_ID] [int] NOT NULL, [Entry_Date] [date] NOT NULL,
[Code] ....
I am using this query to get ( Product name from tbl_products , Buy Price - Total Price- Total Quantity from Tbl_Details )
But am getting a multiple result if the order purchase has more than 1 item :
SELECT DISTINCT B.Product_Name,A.AllPieceBoxes, A.BuyPrice,A.TotalPrice,A.BuyPrice FROM Tbl_Products B INNER JOIN Tbl_PurchaseHeader C ON C.ProductId=B.Product_ID INNER JOIN Tbl_PurchaseDetails A ON A.PurchaseOrder=C.purchaseOrder WHERE A.PurchaseOrder=3
I have persons who speaks multiple languages and they are in one table, each row is added if he/she speaks multiple languages. Instead I want to add additional columns and load the data.(what I have shown in the desired output)
name language ------------- ron  english ron  french ron  spanish andy  english andy  hindi kate  english
Desired output
name language1 language2 language3 language4 language5 language6 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ron  english  french   spanish andy english  hindi Kate englishÂ
I have a table with multiple rows per staff person. Each of these rows has staff_id, start_date, and end_date. Per staff, if any start_date comes between the start_date and end_date of a different row, or if any end_date comes between the start_date and end_date of a different row, then I have to flag these records as being identical.Â
How can I do this? I have tried doing a Cross Apply because I thought that would do Cartesian product (comparing every row), and I've also tried temp tables. But I haven't gotten either of these to work. Here is some dummy data:
if exists (select * from tempdb.dbo.sysobjects o where o.xtype in ('U') and o.id = object_id(N'tempdb..#staff_records') ) DROP TABLE #staff_records; create table #staff_records ( staff_id varchar(max),
I have three tables, Accounts, AccountCustomer and Customers, and the data-relationshiop between are defined according to the image below:
I created also a query (the sql-query below), displaying the customers for every account that is on the table "Accounts", and I got the results, as we can see in the image below:
SELECT A.AccountID, c.CustomerNo, c.Surname, c.Name, c.TaxNum FROM Accounts A left join AccountCustomer ac on ac.AccountID = A.AccountID left join Customers c on c.CustomerNo = ac.CustomerNo order by A.AccountID;
As we understand, an "AccountID" have multiple customers, so I want to transform tha multiple results to one row, grouping by AccountID (one account belongs to one or many Customers), like the image below:
I tried to use row_number()-expression to get this, but I didn't make it. So my question is, how can I alter my sql-query to get the final result like image above?
I have two tables A and B. I want to insert data into tables C and D based on join between A and B (A.column = B.column). What is the best way to accomplish this type of task?
IE-------> If column = xyz then insert into table C IF column = abc then insert into table D ELSE do_not_insert
I've setup RDA (Sql Server 2005) for my WM5 device and it works great to pull a simple table, even with a simple where clause.
I tried to join to tables to limit the number of records but I'm getting an error saying something about cannot track because of multitable query. So is it only possible to pull simple tables with RDA. If it is, is there a workaround?
Hello, I am sort of new to SQL so I thought I would ask you people about this problem I'm having. Let's say I have two tables defined as follows, where the Ids are the primary keys -
Team Table Player Table
id Name TeamId PName 1 Gophers 1 Carman 2 Pioneers 1 Stoa 1 Wheeler 2 Bozak 2 Butler 2 Ostrow
Now let's say I join them using the following statement
SELECT * FROM Team INNER JOIN Player ON Player.TeamId = Team.Id
and it gives me the following - id Name TeamId PName
1 Gophers 1 Carman
1 Gophers 1 Stoa
1 Gophers 1 Wheeler
2 Pioneers 2 Bozak 2 Pioneers 2 Butler
2 Pioneers 2 Ostrow
But what I want as my end result, and I don't know if this is possible using SQL is this -
id Name TeamId PName
1 Gophers 1 Wheeler
NULL NULL 1 Stoa
NULL NULL 1 Carman
2 Pioneers 2 Ostrow NULL NULL 2 Bozak
NULL NULL 2 Butler
Can this be done in SQL using JOIN and how would I do it?
I'm experiencing a really weird problem: I have a SqlCE subscriber connecting via IIS to a SQL Server 2005 database. The database publisher/distributor and the web server are on different machines (IIS being in a DMZ) and I want to avoid the use of Kerberos delegation to share priviledges on the snapshot folder. I configured the web synchronization to accept basic authentication and obviously the subscriber sends @internetlogin and @internetpassword. Plus, I used a DB authentication on the SQL Server database. First problem, if i disable on the publisher configuration the anonymous authentication, replication fails (I expected to be an authenticated user) If i enable anonymous authentication, the replication succeed but ONLY if I don't use join filters. Everything goes well with static filters, overlapping/non overlapping articles, download only tables. Using a dynamic filter results in a "The merge process was unable to deliver the snapshot to the Subscriber" error.
I really can't imagine a way to fix this behaviour.
I was writing a query using both left outer join and inner join. And the query was ....
SELECT Â Â Â Â Â Â Â S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname FROM Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN Â Â Â Â Â Â (Production.Products AS P Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â INNER JOIN Production.Categories AS C
[code]....
However ,the result that i got was correct.But when i did the same query using the left outer join in both the cases
i.e..
SELECT Â Â Â Â Â Â Â S.companyname AS supplier, S.country,P.productid, P.productname, P.unitprice,C.categoryname FROM Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Production.Suppliers AS S LEFT OUTER JOIN (Production.Products AS P LEFT OUTER JOIN Production.Categories AS C ON C.categoryid = P.categoryid) ON S.supplierid = P.supplierid WHERE S.country = N'Japan';
The result i got was same,i.e
supplier   country   productid   productname   unitprice   categorynameSupplier QOVFD   Japan   9   Product AOZBW   97.00   Meat/PoultrySupplier QOVFD   Japan  10   Product YHXGE   31.00   SeafoodSupplier QOVFD   Japan  74   Product BKAZJ   10.00   ProduceSupplier QWUSF   Japan   13   Product POXFU   6.00   SeafoodSupplier QWUSF   Japan   14   Product PWCJB   23.25   ProduceSupplier QWUSF   Japan   15   Product KSZOI   15.50   CondimentsSupplier XYZ   Japan   NULL   NULL   NULL   NULLSupplier XYZ   Japan   NULL   NULL   NULL   NULL
and this time also i got the same result.My question is that is there any specific reason to use inner join when join the third table and not the left outer join.
I have a merge (SQL 2005 Standard -> Express) topolgoy which is having problems
The main problem is that the join filters don't seem to work for one area and I am hoping someone can help me with some troubleshooting advice
There are 140+ tables in the topology but the ones causing particular pain are a parent child relationship where the child is actually a bridge/linking table to another table.
Therefore although it is a parent child in the replication filters it is the reverse. i.e. the child has the paramterised filter on it and the parent is one level down joined by it's id. There are other tables joined to this parent table but it stays at three levels deep. The @join_unique_key therefore is set to 0 as is the partition options for the parent /child relationship.
However, when we synchronise we have a problem. The rows get inserted in to the database in RI order but only the child records are replicated down to the subscriber.
The child table with the parameterised filter has 13 articles joined to it in total and one of the other branches of join filters go down as deep as four levels. Most though do not.
Does anyone have any suggestions as to why this might be happening? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Cheers, James
P.S. I should add this problem only occurs when the edits are made at the publisher. If new records are added at the subscriber everything is fine.
Using Merge replication, I have a table that is filtered using the HOST_NAME() function. The filter also makes use of a function (as the HOST_NAME() is overriden to return some complex data).
Everything replicates and filters just fine. but when I add a join filter on a different table (the join filter is a simple foreign key join) I get the following error when the snapshot agent is run:
Message: Conflicting locking hints are specified for table "fn_GetIDList". This may be caused by a conflicting hint specified for a view. Command Text: sp_MSsetup_partition_groups Parameters: @publication = test1
fn_GetIDList is the function used in the original filter.
I have a set of udf's dealing that return a one column table of valuesparsed from a comma delimeted string.For example:CREATE FUNCTION [dbo].[udf_filter_patient](@patient_list varchar(2000))RETURNS @patient TABLE(patient_id int)ASBEGINinsert into @patientselect patient_id from patient-- parse @patient_list stuff excludedRETURNENDI have come up with the following two schemes to use these udfs. Theseexamples are obviously simplified, and I have a handful of stored proceduresthat will use between 10 or more of these filters. If the two areequivalent, I prefer Method 2 because it makes for much neater SQL whenusing many filter criteria.So my question is, will one noticebly outperform the other? Or is there abetter way in which to filter on a list of criteria?Method 1 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASCREATE TABLE #patient(patient_id int)INSERT INTO #patientSELECTpatient_idFROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list )SELECT*FROMopen_billsINNER JOIN #patient on #patient.patient_id = open_bills.patient_idGOMethod 2 :CREATE PROC sp__filter_open_bills@patient_list varchar(2000)ASSELECT*FROMopen_billsWHEREopen_bills.patient_id IN ( SELECT patient_id FROMdbo.udf_filter_patient( @patient_list ) )GOThanks for the help!Chris G
I want to created a filter that filters on some aggregated data, but keep getting the error listed below. Is there a way around this?
[rsAggregateInFilterExpression] A FilterExpression for the data set €˜DataSet1€™ includes an aggregate function. Aggregate functions cannot be used in data set filters or data region filters.
Is there a way w.out using TSQL to filter the "ID" number which has all three "Code" of X1,X2, X3 associated with it. In the above example I would only want "ID" AAAAA and CCCCC returned. Thanks in Advance
I want to filter rows in script transformation. Since there is no isnumeric function in SSIS, i want to use script transformation to remove or block some rows in script. My question is how to remove or block some rows from data flow?
For some other reasons, script transformation is my preferred choice for this problem..
I have a SQL script to insert data into a table as below:
INSERT into [SRV1INS2].BB.dbo.Agents2 select * from [SRV2INS14].DD.dbo.Agents
I just want to set a Trigger on Agents2 Table, which could delete all rows in the table , before carry out any Insert operation using above statement.I had below Table Trigger on [SRV1INS2].BB.dbo.Agents2 Table as below: But it did not perform what I intend to do.
USE [BB] GO /****** Object: Trigger   Script Date: 24/07/2015 3:41:38 PM ******/ SET ANSI_NULLS ON GO SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
declare tableName table ( uniqueid int identity(1,1), id int, starttime datetime2(0), endtime datetime2(0), parameter int )
A stored procedure has new set of values for a given id. Sometimes the startime and endtime are the same, in which case I update the value of parameter. Sometimes I add a new time range (insert statement), and sometimes I delete a time range (delete statement).
I had a question on merge, with insert, delete and update and I got that resolved. However I have a different question regarding performance of the merge statement.
If my target table has hundreds of millions of records and I want to delete/update/insert a handful of records, will SQL server scan the entire target table? I can't have:
merge ( select * from tableName where id = 10 ) as target using ...
and I can't have:
merge tableName as target using [my query] as source on source.id = target.id and source.starttime = target.startime and source.endtime = target.endtime where target.id = 10 ...
This means I cannot filter the set of rows in the target table to a handful of records where id = 10.
I'm running SQL Server 2008 Feb08 CTP and I've got a tablix with column groupings and row groupings which works nicely, I'm a becomming a big fan of the tablix.
However sometimes the filter I have on a column group returns no records and the whole column group disappears. Is there any way to make this column appear with but with empty cells as I have another tablix down the page with the same columns and I want the columns to all line up on the multiple tablix.
In Version 2005 I used to achieve the equivalent of a column group within a table by adding a list with filter to the cell, this meant the column always was shown, the tablix allows does this much more elegantly but I'll have to go back to the old method if I can't make the column remain.
