I have a database in which I have some tables in which I have implemented Clustered columnstore Index. How to find the fragmentation levels of all these indexes via a single T-SQl script
View 3 RepliesHow can we get the list of clustered columnstore index in a database in sql server 2014
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've been asked to look at using Clustered Columnstore indexes for one of my tables. The table contains about 5 million records with about 50 columns. The max field size is a NVarchar(MAX) with max field length currently of about 4k characters. It's only about a gigabyte's worth of data. The table is about 50% R/W operations. Currently, we have multiple indexes with no clustered index due to some performance issues that happened in the past. I've been attempting to determine if it's even really worth it to switch over. I feel that the table is still fairly small with minimal columns and don't believe there will be any noticeable improvement over traditional indexing.
View 3 Replies View RelatedSo I'm reading http://www.sql-server-performance.com/tips/clustered_indexes_p2.aspx and I come across this:
When selecting a column to base your clustered index on, try to avoid columns that are frequently updated. Every time that a column used for a clustered index is modified, all of the non-clustered indexes must also be updated, creating additional overhead. [6.5, 7.0, 2000, 2005] Updated 3-5-2004
Does this mean if I have say a table called Item with a clustered index on a column in it called itemaddeddate, and several non-clustered indexes associated with that table, that if a record gets modified and it's itemaddeddate value changes, that ALL my indexes on that table will get rebuilt? Or is it referring to the table structure changing?
If so does this "pseudocode" example also cause this to occur:
sqlstring="select * from item where itemid=12345"
rs.open sqlstring, etc, etc, etc
rs.Fields("ItemName")="My New Item Name"
rs.Fields("ItemPrice")=1.00
rs.Update
Note I didn't explicitly change the value of rs.fields("ItemAddedDate")...does rs.Fields("ItemAddedDate")=rs.Fields("ItemAddedDate") occur implicitly, which would force the rebuild of all the non-clustered indexes?
I have a requirement to only rebuild the Clustered Indexes in the table ignoring the non clustered indexes as those are taken care of by the Clustered indexes.
In order to do that, I have taken the records based on the fragmentation %.
But unable to come up with a logic to only consider rebuilding the clustered indexes in the table.
create table #fragmentation
(
FragIndexId BigInt Identity(1,1),
--IDENTITY(int, 1, 1) AS FragIndexId,
DBNAME nvarchar(4000),
TableName nvarchar(4000),
[Code] ....
In my database all columns have Identity Value as a PK.
Now today I check Index Fragmentation I saw that many cluster and Non cluster Index are avg.Fragmentation is around 99 % I thought that in Identity column record is always inserted at bottom so there is no fill factor assigned to it.
So in this case Do I need to set Fill factor for Cluster and Non Cluster Index?
If Yes Then For PK How much - 95 % or what? and same for Non cluster or It should around 85 to 90
I have a database where records are Inserted by an external process.
There is no updating or deleting of the data once inserted. The table in
question has a Clustered Index on the Machine_ID (integer) (data is from
manufacturing processes). Each record bears a start and end time. Most
queries involve the Machine, a time span (start time between to points in
time), the Downtime Cause, and the Running Mode.
I want to add an index on the Start Time, the Downtime Cause, and the
Runtime Mode.
My question is: should this new index also contain the Machine_id column
or does the existence of the Clustered Index already on that column negate
its need in the new index?
RC - Dedicated to only creating original mistakes!
I am building three partitioned, clustered column store tables.I was researching whether it was faster to populate a staging table and swap it into the partitioned table or to directly insert into the partitioned table.The first partition for the three tables will have:
Table F: 50M rows, 6 columns wide, partitioned on a date column (1 date, 2 bigint keys, and two varchar columns)
Table D1: 50M rows, 150 columns wide, partitioned on a bigint
Table D2: 19M rows, 300 columns wide, partitioned on a bigint
If build the data that would go into partition 1 in a non partitioned column store, I get these table sizes:
Table F: 476 MB
Table D1: 6,800 MB
Table D2: 5,496 MB
If build the same data directly in the partitioned column store, my table sizes end up being:
Table F: 579 MB
Table D1: 6,800 MB
Table D2: 5,364 MB
That's a 20% difference on Table F, the narrow table.Looking at the row groups, I see 47 identical row groups in partition 1 and the unpartitioned table, but the average "size_in_bytes" is consistently 20% smaller in the unpartitioned table.
I have created NONCLUSTERED index on table but my report is taking more time that's why i created columnstore NONCLUSTERED index on the same table but i have one query, if any table have row and column level index(same columns in index) . Which index query will consider.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to use an indexed view to allow for aggregations to be generated more quickly in my test data warehouse. The Fact Table I am creating the indexed view on is a partitioned clustered columnstore index.
I have created a view with the following code:
ALTER view dbo.FactView
with schemabinding
as
select local_date_key, meter_key, unit_key, read_type_key, sum(isnull(read_value,0)) as [s_read_value], sum(isnull(cost,0)) as [s_cost]
, sum(isnull(easy_target_value,0)) as [s_easy_target_value], sum(isnull(hard_target_value,0)) as [s_hard_target_value]
, sum(isnull(read_value,0)) as [a_read_value], sum(isnull(temperature,0)) as [a_temp], sum(isnull(co2,0)) as [s_co2]
, sum(isnull(easy_target_co2,0)) as [s_easy_target_co2]
, sum(isnull(hard_target_co2,0)) as [s_hard_target_co2], sum(isnull(temp1,0)) as [a_temp1], sum(isnull(temp2,0)) as [a_temp2]
, sum(isnull(volume,0)) as [s_volume], count_big(*) as [freq]
from dbo.FactConsumptionPart
group by local_date_key, read_type_key, meter_key, unit_key
I then created an index on the view as follows:
create unique clustered index IDX_FV on factview (local_date_key, read_type_key, meter_key, unit_key)
I then followed this up by running some large calculations that required use of the aggregation functionality on the main fact table, grouping by the clustered index columns and only returning averages and sums that are available in the view, but it still uses the underlying table to perform the aggregations, rather than the view I have created. Running an equivalent query on the view, then it takes 75% less time to query the indexed view directly, to using the fact table. I think the expected behaviour was that in SQL Server Enterprise or Developer edition (I am using developer edition), then the fact table should have used the indexed view. what I might be missing, for the query not to be using the indexed view?
What is the easiest way to remember the definitions of clustered and non clustered indexes.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI had an existing table with lots of indexes.
As a test (fro speed) - I added a non clustered column-store index.
When I run test queries it always ignores my new column-store index. Why?
Should I remove the old indexes, leaving just the column store?
I need to find out all the tables in database, which has FK columns and don’t have any Non-clustered index on them.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have a table that has a clustered index that is only the identity column on the table. The table is somewhere around 200K rows and has 3800 pages in the index. We run our index maintenance every other day on this database using Ola's scripts and this index is rebuilt because it is 40-60% fragmented after 2 days. Overall, this isn't really too much of a problem since the index rebuild doesn't take too long, but I am puzzled as to how this index is getting fragmented since the only column in it is the identity.
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[Example](
[ExampleID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[ExampleCode] [varchar](10) NOT NULL,
[ForeignID] [int] NOT NULL,
[AnotherID] [int] NOT NULL,
[code]...
) ON [PRIMARY]There is nothing strange like updates to the identity happening and while some records are deleted, there has only been about 20,000 in the life of the table (months). Not enough to account for the level of fragmentation that we're seeing on the index.About the only thing I can think of that would cause fragmentation on this index in this scenario are:
1. Page splits caused by starting with a small value in one of the VARCHARs and later inserting a larger value
2. Page splits caused by the NULLABLE column, ExampleDate, starting with NULLs and later updating them to a date.
For #1, I had development check the update scenarios for the varchar columns, especially the varchar(1000) one, and they didn't see it as a common thing where the values would go from small (or empty) to large.
For #2, I checked and found that the only value for that column in the table is NULL so while it always starts as NULL, it never gets updated to anything else.
I've tried looking at sys.dm_db_index_operational_stats and the leaf_update_count is around 300,000, but unless those updates are causing page splits, I don't see how they would contribute to fragmentation.
Hi
I try to find the percentage of fragmentation in the perticular table using the following table. For some tables it is getting the results but for some database tables it is saying the error in qurey even if I use same query. Is there any reason for that. Or is there any other way to find out the fragmentation of table. any help would be fine. Thanks!
SELECT a.index_id, name, avg_fragmentation_in_percent
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (DB_ID(), OBJECT_ID(N'schema.tablename),
NULL, NULL, NULL) AS a
JOIN sys.indexes AS b ON a.object_id = b.object_id AND a.index_id = b.index_id;
GO
And is there any way to find out when did index rebuild occurs in perticular index or table. Thank you very much.
I have rebuilded indexes and some of the indexes still showing fragmentation percentage as 99%. I have cross checked page count for these indexes and they are more than 10000 pages.As i am aware if the page count is less we can ignore this percentage. But in my case the page count is 10000.
View 2 Replies View Related
I am trying to automate my index rebuild and reorg based off of the percentage of fragmentation level. The first time you run it you have to change the alter proce Sp_NCRNRecreate then change it to Alter proc. It seems to run okay no errors but it doesn't seem to actually rebuild them. Please take a look and let me know if you see a program error somewhere. I would like create this sp to run automatically
use master
GO
Alter PROC sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes @AutoRun bit=0 AS
BEGIN
DECLARE @DatabaseName varchar(128), @SchemaName varchar(128), @objectName varchar(128), @IndexName varchar(128), @PercentFragmented float, @command varchar(max)
SELECT db_name(s.database_id) as DatabaseName, schema_name(o.schema_id) as SchemaName, o.name as TableName, i.name as IndexName, s.avg_fragmentation_in_percent AS PercentFragmented
INTO #IndexesToRebuild
FROM sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats (db_id(), Null, NULL, NULL, NULL) s
INNER JOIN sys.objects o ON s.object_id=o.object_id
INNER JOIN sys.indexes i ON s.object_id=i.object_id AND s.index_id=i.index_id
WHERE s.avg_fragmentation_in_percent > 10.0 AND s.index_id > 0
SELECT * FROM #IndexesToRebuild
DECLARE IndexCursor CURSOR FOR SELECT DatabaseName, SchemaName, TableName, IndexName, PercentFragmented FROM #IndexesToRebuild
OPEN IndexCursor
FETCH IndexCursor INTO @DatabaseName, @SchemaName, @objectName, @IndexName, @PercentFragmented
WHILE @@FETCH_STATUS=0
BEGIN
SELECT @command = 'ALTER INDEX ' + @indexname +' ON ' + @databaseName + '.' + @schemaname + '.' + @objectName + CASE WHEN @PercentFragmented<30 THEN ' REORGANIZE' ELSE ' REBUILD' END;
print @command
IF @AutoRun=1
EXEC(@command)
FETCH IndexCursor INTO @DatabaseName, @SchemaName, @objectName, @IndexName, @PercentFragmented
END
--SELECT * FROM #IndexStats
END
GO
EXEC sys.sp_MS_marksystemobject sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes
GO
EXEC otis..sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes
EXEC ncrCommon..sp_NCR_RecreateIndexes
GO
I have an issue with fragmentation SQl server 2012 .I monitored indexes using sys.dm_db_index_physical_stats. fragmented % is still remain after re-organized the index.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI would like to find information on Clustered and Non-clustered indexes and how B-trees are used. I know a clustered index is placed into a b-tree which makes sense for fast ordered searching. What data structure does a non-clustered index use and how? I tried to find info. on the web but couldn't get much detail...
View 3 Replies View RelatedI wanted to find all occurrences of ADRSCODE in a Database where ADRSCODE is in either an Index or a Primary Key.
I know how to get all of the occurences of ADRSCODE in a database and the table associated with it, I just want to tack on the Index and/or primary key.
SELECTOBJECT_NAME(object_id)FROMsys.columns
WHEREname
='foo'
How can I get the other bit of information ?
What are the disadvantages of columnstore index in Sql Server 2012
View 4 Replies View Relatedhi,
how clustered indexes and non-clustered indexes been saved in memory?
non-clustered is a table of a references to the actual table?
and what about clustered indexes?
thanks.
I have a table which has a recursive relationship to its self neither of the columns involved are FK columns
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ix_Trace](
[Trace_Id] [uniqueidentifier] NOT NULL,
[Trace_BubbledTraceEnter_Id] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
[Trace_EnterId] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
[Trace_Application_Id] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
[Trace_Session_Id] [uniqueidentifier] NULL,
....
Where Trace_EnterId is the parent ID and BubbledTraceEnter_Id is the child ID. My test case has nested trace lines that go down 5 levels, but when I delete the top trace line, only the child directly under it is deleted leaving the other 3 as orphans. Here's the trigger:
ALTER TRIGGER [dbo].[DTrig_xTrace]
ON [dbo].[ix_Trace]
FOR Delete
AS
BEGIN
SET NOCOUNT ON;
DELETE FROM ix_Trace
FROM ix_Trace INNER JOIN
deleted as dt ON ix_Trace.Trace_BubbledTraceEnter_Id = dt.Trace_EnterId
How can I make this cascade all the way down?
Can anyone help ?
If you have a clustered index on an identity field are appends then forced onto the last page anyway because of the identity field order. So is there any advanbtage of having a clustered identity field ?
I need to convert several tables that currently have nonclustered indexes (primary keys) to clustered. Could anyone suggest what the easiest way of doing this would be.
View 1 Replies View Relatedhi
can someone tell me why there are only 249 non-clustered indexes,
is there any significance to that number
Hi,The more I read, the more confused I'm getting ! (no wonder they sayignorance is bliss)I just got back from the bookstore and was flipping through some SQL ServerAdministration books.One says, that to get the best query performance, youi do two things:1. Cover all the columns used in each SELECT (including the WHERE, ORDERBY , etc.) with an index2. Make sure it's a NON-CLUSTERED index.In this way, the author says, you avoid ever going directly to the basetables for data to resolve the query - i.e. it's resolved in the index.So, for example, he argues if you have:SELECT Lname,Fname, CompanyNamefrom Contactsinner join Customerson (contacts.custid = customers.custid)that you use two non-clustered indexes:1. Lname,Fname and custid from the Contacts table2. CompanyName and custid from Customers(as opposed to the standard approach of a clustered index on the PK's ofeach table)He says that clustered indexes don't speed up performance because they'rethe same as a full table scan. Should I drop clustered indexes from mylarge tables, given that there are multiple non-clustered indexes on them?Is it better to just use multiple non-clustered indexes on a heap table?Steve
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat is the difference please?
View 1 Replies View RelatedSQL 7 created by default a clustered index on my primary key field. I would like to drop this index and recreate it on another field, but it is not allowing me. Error message states: "An explicit DROP INDEX is not allowed... It is being used for PRIMARY KEY CONSTRAINT enforcement." Can anybody advise how I can solve this? TIA
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs any one know of a way of changing the clustered index without creating in the middle the default clustered index
we have a big table that we use to switch the clustered index
whenever we change the clustered index we cannot change it directly we have
to drop the existing than the default clustered is built
and than we can built the new one - since it is a big table the process
takes a lot of time and I wonder if we can do it directly from one cluster
index to another
What we do not is running the following SQL:
-- remove the old index
drop index Tbl.I_oldId
GO
-- now create the newId as clustered
CREATE CLUSTERED
INDEX [I_newId] ON Tbl ([newId])
ON [PRIMARY]
GO
Any Idea ?
Thanks
David
Using SQL Server 2000 ... hopefully not too dumb a question.
Is there a performance hit using Clustered Index on a table that gets a lot of deletes?
I'm creating a Transaction Log table that will get about 4,000 inserts per day. The value of some of this historical data is worthless after a while, so I delete it.
It occurs to me that this may create a lot of fragmentation. If so, is this cleaned up during weekly "Reorganize data and index pages" in the Maintenance Plan? Do I also need to select "Remove unused space from database files"?
Additional question: I though that care needed to be taken that a clustered key be a value that always increments (datestamp, identity key, etc), yet in this write-up, it shows using randomly generated key values. I'm confused. Wouldn't it have to reorganize everything with greater values to insert the new row into the appropriate spot?
http://www.sql-server-performance.com/gv_clustered_indexes.asp
Greetings all,
What's best practice for creating clustered indexes?! Should they be added to a table AFTER it has been populated or should the clustered index be created BEFORE?
Thanks for your advice in advance.
When you Upsize from Access using the wizard, unsurprisingly, a Unique index is created on the PK field, but these are all non-clustered. I presume there isn't one definitive answer to whether a index should be clustered or not, (which I understand means the table's records are held on disk contiguously), but generally, is it worth altering these all to become clustered?
Would you selectively cluster only those tables which you think would benefit most? Leave them all unclustered and look for bottle-necks?