Transact SQL :: RANK - Using To Take Only Changes For One Column
Nov 8, 2015
I have a table that has the definition from the picture. Let's suppose I will sort the list based on last column (DATA.ORA - DESC). That means the last row inserted is the first one in the sorted list.
What I would like to do is to get only the records when the value of a specific column is different from the row below.
For instance I would like to get the rows where the column WHITE has different values. When the status for column WHITE changes from 0 to 1 or from 1 to 2 etc., then I need that row no matter if next 5 rows has the same status (1).
In the picture you see what the result of query should be:
Result: only the lines where the value of column WHITE is different than the row below.
Hi,All, I have one table like this UserID,Name,GameScore 1 A 25 2 B 23 3 C 22 4 D 25 5 E 23 6 F 26 Now i want the query which return like this Name Score Rank F 26 1 A 25 2 D 25 2 B 23 3 E 23 3 C 22 4 Can anyone give me the sql 2000 query for this
Assuming that I have a table similar to this simplified version:
CREATE TABLE [SomeTable] ([Field1] NVARCHAR(50));
How could I count and rank the instances of specific values in the "field1" column? For example, let's say that I want to show the frequency of the column values like so:
field1 count some value 24 another word 20 a value 5
I'm trying to script a view that does a simple query to some tables. The catch is 2 of the columns are created on run time. The first column is filled with a calculation with values of other columns. The 2nd column I would like to fill with the ranking of this calculated column
Example: (imagine caculatedcol is Sum(Col1+Col2+Col3)
I am looking to add a column to one of my tables that displays a running rank of how many times a customer has ordered in a given period.Â
I currently have such a column however this column ranks against ALL of the orders that a customer has placed and ignores filters, whereas I need one that ranks based on the filters that are active at any given time.Â
The current formula is:
CustOrderCountPersistant=RANKX(FILTER('Q1 Data Set',[k1_customer_id]=EARLIER([k1_customer_id])),[order_id],[order_id],1,DENSE)
For example, if I am looking at a full years worth of data and a customer has placed 10 orders in that period this formula will add a 1 in the column for first order, a 2 for the second and so forth all the way to 10, the last order.Â
However it will give me exactly the same results if I filter the data to just one month of that year where they may have order only 2 orders.Â
In this scenario I want to have another column with a table that is filter sensitive and would show 1 for the first order and 2 for the second order.Â
Now, I do understand that the issue here is probably the FILTER() I have on as, if I understand correctly, that means all other filters are ignored. My attempts at reworking the formula to remove this have been unsuccessful (such as using a CALCUALTE and trying to use filter properties within that forumula).
To explain the context - I want to create a measure that counts how many customers have placed x amount orders in y number of days e.g. how many customers have placed 2 orders in 30 days.
Table Name EmployeeInformation EmployeeID EmployeeFirstName EmployeeLastName   1       |John            |Baker   2       |Carl             |Lennon   3       |Marion           |Herbert
Table Name PeriodInformation PeriodID PeriodStart PeriodEnd   1     |1/1/14    |12/30/14   2     |1/1/15    |12/30/15
[code]...
I want a query to join all this tables based on EmployeeID, PeriodID and LeaveTypeIDÂ sum of LeaveEntitlement.LeaveEntitlementDaysNumber based on LeaveTypeID AS EntitleAnnaul and AS EntitleSick and sum AssignedLeave.AssignedLeaveDaysNumber based on LeaveTypeIDÂ Â AS AssignedAnnaul and AS AssignedSick and subtract EntitleAnnaul from AssignedAnnual based on LeaveTypeIDÂ Â AS AnnualBalance and subtract EntitleSick from AssignedSick based on LeaveTypeIDÂ Â AS SickBalance
and the table should be shown as below after executing the query
I am having issues trying to write a query that would provide me the unique GUID numbers associated with a distinct PID if the unique GUID's > 1. Â To summarize, I need a query that just shows which PID's have more than one unique GUID. A PID could have multiple GUID's that are the same, I'm looking for the PID's that have multiple GUID's that are different/unique.Â
I have a SQL Query issue you can find in SQL Fiddle
SQL FIDDLE for Demo
My query was like this
For Insert Insert into Employee values('aa', 'T', 'qqq') Insert into Employee values('aa' , 'F' , 'qqq') Insert into Employee values('bb', 'F' , 'eee') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'T' , 'rrr') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'pp' , 'aaa') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'Zz' , 'bab') Insert into Employee values('cc' , 'ZZ' , 'bac') For select select col1,MAX(col2) as Col2,Max(Col3) as Col3 from Employee group by Col1
Is there a way we can get Table and Column name in separate column using PIVOT or something?Right now what i have is:
Text                           QueryPlan       Plan_handle       Name     Value
select id,name,Address from person   <showPlznXML...  010101         Table       Person select id,name,Address from person   <showPlznXML...  010101         column     id select id,name,Address from person   <showPlznXML...  010101         Table       Person
How I can calculate the 'SUM of 100' of EDSUM column for EDCOST column. Every EDCOST should have sum of 100 on the calculation of EDSUM. I just want to know which is the EDCOST which has <>sum of 100.
Create table #sum (ED numeric, EDCOST numeric, EDName char(6), EDSum numeric, EDCode char(2)) Insert into #sum values (121, 2000,'HLMO',98,'DT') Insert into #sum values (122, 2000,'HLMT',2,'DT') Insert into #sum values (123, 2001,'HLMO',100,'DT') Insert into #sum values (124, 2002,'HLMD',97,'DT')
[Code] ...
Expeced Output: ED EDCOST EDName EDSum EDCode 126 2003 HLMR  98 DT 130 2005 HLMR  98 DT
-- I want to subtract @X and col1. But my variable @X must be reduced for each value in col1 for each next row until it reaches zero.
-- OUTPUT:
-- id col1 col2 --@X at starting point is 15000 -- 1 5000.00 0 --@X IS 10000 = 15000 - 5000(col1) -- 2 1000.00 0 --@X IS 9000 = 10000 - 1000 -- 3 10000.00 1000.00 --@X IS 1000 = 9000 - 10000 -- 4 12000.00 12000.00 -- 5 300.00 300.00 -- 6 35000.00 35000.00
--in col2 i just put zero where col1 is substract from @X and continue for every subsequent order. -- in 3 row value is 1000 becouse @X is that big (1000 left from col1)
i dont't know how to select row with max column value group by another column. I have T-SQL
CREATE PROC GET_USER AS BEGIN SELECT T.USER_ID ,MAX(T.START_DATE) AS [Max First Start Date] , MAX(T.[Second Start Date]) AS [Max Second Start Date], T.PC_GRADE,T.FULL_NAME,T.COST_CENTER,T.TYPE_PERSON_NAME,T.TRANSACTION_NAME,T.DEPARTMENT_NAME ,T.BU_NAME,T.BRANCH_NAME,T.POSITION_NAME FROM (
I want to add spaces (like space - len(col)) to first column so that second column will be aligned when exported to email (text).
DECLARE @ColumnSpaces TABLE ( Â Col_1 VARCHAR(50), Â Col_2 VARCHAR(50) Â ) INSERT INTO @ColumnSpaces VALUES ('AAA', '123') INSERT INTO @ColumnSpaces VALUES ('AAAAAAAAAAAAAAA', '123')
SELECT[RANK] ,[KEY],idc.* FROMFREETEXTTABL (dbo.indice,mcaNombre,fabNombre,catNombre), 'ropa adidas nike', LANGUAGE 3082, 5) res left join dbo.indice idc with (nolock) on idc.idcCodigo=res.[key] ORDER BY [RANK] DESC;
Result:
RANK KEY 182 03 04 01
Why idcCods's 1 and 2 have different rank?? because idcCod's 3 and 4 affects ?? or it's just thinks of language??
Ok. Im not able to understand this logic please help. As you can see we have 2 columns of ranks, 1)normal 2)corrective. what is the logic behind this and how do u write a query for this? these ranks are for the Salary Column. Imran, "You truly do not know someone untill you fight them."-THE MATRIX.
EmpID Empname EmpSalary RankNormal RankCorrective 1 A 150001 1 2 B 100002 4 3 C 150001 1 4 D 40003 5 5 E 150001 1 6 F 15004 6 7 G 15004 6 8 H 5005 8
Hi All, Please let me know the equivalent of RANK() over ( order by...) in SQL server 2000. I thought this was supported in SQL server 2000. Please let me know if there exists a user defined function. Thanks in Advance.
I would like to write a query that gives me the values of a set ofobservations, and their rank.CREATE TABLE #Values(val int)INSERT #Values SELECT 1INSERT #Values SELECT 5INSERT #Values SELECT 10I would like to select this:1 10 -- rank 1, value 102 53 1I can put them into a temp table with an identity column, ordered bythe column I'm interested in, and then retrieve in order by theidentity column. I'm wondering if there's a way to do that with asubquery.Thanks,Jim
I've written a bunch of code using contains for fts. Then as I was trying to run the sorting, I realized that I have to use containstable in order to sort by rank. Is that correct? When I was using contains, I just used it as a where clause so I would have something like...
WHERE ((PostedUntil >= '5/22/2006') AND (SiteId=199)) AND (CONTAINS (PositionTitle, '"sales"') OR CONTAINS (Description, '"sales"'))
From the examples I've seen, in order to use containstable, I have to join a new dynamic table to the freetext enabled table and it only uses 1 containstable phrase for the new table. In my case, I may have multiple containstable phrases, so would they all fall in a () set like..
FROM Categories AS FT_TBL INNER JOIN (CONTAINSTABLE (table, col1, searchphrase) OR (CONTAINSTABLE(table, col2, searchphrase2) OR CONTAINSTABLE (table, col3, searchphrase3)) AS KEY_TBL
... or would each containstable have to be a new join? I don't want to spend anymore time going back and rewriting code just to test it since it's about a days worth of recoding. Thanks.
ive created a photo sharing site, and im trying to show the statisics for certain users, so far i can COUNT all the photos the user has upload, and show them in descending order, but i need to be able to see the ranking of the user, like :
until recently ive been using a rank equation to calculate rank,
essentially doing a select statement and selecting this as the rank field, where query 2 is the same as query 1:
((select count(*) from (query1) where (query1).value < (query2).value) +1)) as Rank
problem is that this is now running like a dog (takes 10 secs) and i'd like to try and do this another way- 2005 has a rank function, how can i do this in 2000?
here is the full statement :
SELECT StudentId, GCSE_Score, LTRIM(STR ((SELECT COUNT(*) FROM dbo.[Score2004-05] WHERE GCSE_score < s.GCSE_Score) + 1)) AS GCSE_Rank, SetId FROM dbo.[Score2004-05] S WHERE (SetId = '2004/2005')
I need help in understanding how the rank is calculated in FREETEXTABLE. I have a following query
select ft_tbl.saon ,ft_tbl.paon ,ft_tbl.street ,ft_tbl.postcode ,key_tbl.rank from temp as ft_tbl INNER JOIN freetextTABLE(temp, (saon, paon, street), '80 ridge avenue', 15) as key_tbl ON FT_tbl.ID = key_tbl.[key]
First, the resulting rows does have one record which has an address 80 ridge avenue but it appears at 15th place. Ideally it should appear on 1st. All the ranks of the results are same.
Second, the results are also showing two rows which does not contain the specified search string at all. They not only appears above in the resulting table but also have the same rank as the result in question (80 ridge avenue). For example result shows €œLong Ridges, Flat 21, Fortis Green€? at fifth place which is no way near the search string. And actual record shows up at 15th Place
Is there any way we can influence the rank to show exact match first. Just to clarify I have removed the digits from noise file as we need to search house numbers. Digits appears in noise file as default.
I have a report created and within the report is columns that perform additions on the fields from the database.
I want to create a rank column to show the rank of the row compare with the rest.
Col1 Col2 Total Ranks 1 2 3 3 2 3 5 1 2 2 4 2
On the above Col 1 and 2 would come form my database, Total is calculated by the report. How can I get ranking on this total? I cannot sort by the total as the report should only showing rankings but not be ordered by the rank.
I am using SQL Server 2005 Reporting Services...anny help is much appreciated.
(SELECT JumpHeight, DogIdent, MIN(RunDate) as "MinRunDate", COUNT(Event_ID) AS "NoEvents",
RANK() OVER (PARTITION BY JumpHeight ORDER BY COUNT(Event_ID) DESC, MIN(RunDate)) AS "HeightRank"
FROM EventData
WHERE Event=@Event
GROUP BY JumpHeight, DogIdent) AS xx, Dogs, DogOwner
WHERE (Dogs.Breed = @Breed AND xx.DogIdent = Dogs.DogIdent and Dogs.Owner_ID = DogOwner.Owner_ID) AND
(xx.HeightRank <= 10)
ORDER BY xx.JumpHeight, xx.HeightRank
produces this output:
Jump Ht.
Rank
# of Events
First Event
Owner
Call Name
08
3
1
2/19/2006
Some Owner
Otto
08
4
1
3/12/2006
Some Owner
Schotzie
I want it to produce this output:
Jump Ht.
Rank
# of Events
First Event
Owner
Call Name
08
1
1
2/19/2006
Some Owner
Otto
08
2
1
3/12/2006
Some Owner
Schotzie
I have tried several things and cannot correct the problem. Obviously, RANK is being evaluated in the wrong place, but placing it elsewhere has failed to produce the above results.
In the Sql below, sample from William Pearson, the amount Spend is in descending order and the Rank number is in ascending order. Like this:
Spend Rank 24 1 12 2 10 3 9 4
What I wish to accomplish is:
Spend Rank (descending) 24 4 12 3 10 2 9 1
Please let me know what I need to accomplish it.
Thanks for the help
Victor
SELECT CompanyName, Spend, (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM ACC0704 AS CoSpendTotal WHERE ACC0704.Spend <= CoSpendTotal.Spend) AS Rank FROM ACC0704 ORDER BY Spend DESC
