Transact SQL :: Row Level Constraint
Aug 12, 2015I want to enforce a constraint on the table where , the same MenuId cannot have 2 different prices for the same date range (accidentally).I think CHECK constraint won't work.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Column Level Constraints... I Need A Constraint, Not A Rule, Or A Trigger Or A Stored Proc... Thnx.
Jul 17, 2001Hello all.
First of all, I've been a reader of swynk.com for quite sometime now, and I'd like to say 'thank you' to everyone who contributes.
Today, I'm the town moron.. haha I'm having issues with column level constraints. I have a varchar(50) where I want to keep *,=,#,/, .. etc, OUT OF the value input. I don't want to strip them. I simply want for sql to throw an error if the insert contains those (and other characters). The only characters that I want in the column are A-Z and 0-9. However, it's not a set number of characters per insert. It always varies... There has to be an easier way to do this than creating a constraint for every possibilty... Any help would be greatly appreciated.
tia,
Jeremy
SQL Security :: Enforcing Unique Constraint On A Column Encrypted With Cell Level Encryption?
May 11, 2015I want to enforce a unique constraint on a column which must be encrypted in MSSQL 2005 using Cell Level Encyption (CLE).
CREATE MASTER KEY ENCRYPTION BY PASSWORD = 'itsaSECRET!!!3£3£3£!!!'
CREATE CERTIFICATE ERCERT WITH SUBJECT = 'A cert for use by procs'
CREATE SYMMETRIC KEY ERKEY
WITH ALGORITHM = AES_256
ENCRYPTION BY CERTIFICATE ERCERT
[Code] ....
The output makes it obvious why the constraint has 'not' been enforced.
Email
-------
1 | 0x00703529AF46D24BA863A3534260374E01000000328909B51BA44A49510F24DF31
C46F2E30977626D96617E2BD13D9115EB578852EEBAE326B8F3E2D422230478A29767C
2 | 0x00703529AF46D24BA863A3534260374E01000000773E06E1B53F2C57F97C54370FECBB45B
C8A154FEA5CEEB9B6BB1133305282328AAFAD65B9BDC595F0006474190F6482
3 | 0x00703529AF46D24BA863A3534260374E01000000C9EDB1C83B52E60598038D832D34
D75867AB0ABB23F9044B7EBC76832F22C432A867078D10974DC3717D6086D3031BDB
But, how do I work around this?
Transact SQL :: How To Alter Table To Add A Constraint
Sep 19, 2015There is a table exists in a database name tbDatabaseProviders.
I want to alter this table to add a column DatabaseProvider Also I want to add a default constraint so if nothing than 1 should be added.
Remember, the table already exists so when I write the script query then I want to first check the constraint if it exists then I dont want to add the constrait otherwise I will add it.
I was having problem to first add a constraint with the constraint name so I could find the constraint before finding it if it already exists.
What should I do the above.
Transact SQL :: Adding Constraint For Business Logic
May 27, 2015ALTER TABLE [dbo].[bkrm_lendcoll] ADD CONSTRAINT
ReqdCovgAmt_constraint33 CHECK
( case
when CovgAmt = 0 and ReqdCovgAmt = 0 then 1
when CovgAmt = 0 and ReqdCovgAmt = 1 then 1
when CovgAmt = 1 and ReqdCovgAmt = 0 then 1
when CovgAmt = 1 and ReqdCovgAmt = 1 then 0
end =1
)
This is my first attempt to add a constraint for business logic. The desired behavior is that the two columns together have the same behavior as a radio button. (one can be true, the other true, both can be false, but both cannot be true.) I get this error when I attempt to update it.
The ALTER TABLE statement conflicted with the CHECK constraint "ReqdCovgAmt_constraint33". The conflict occurred in database "Std", table "dbo.lendcoll".
So, basically my question is, when you have two bit columns and want them to have the truth table such as described, how can I set a Check constraint to enforce this?
Transact SQL :: Delete A Default Constraint On A Column?
May 5, 2015 I have a table named [New Item] and created a default constraint on a column, and i wanted to change the data type of the column using the query
alter table [new item]
alter column pcs_qty decimal(15,2) not null
but the name of the default constraint is 'DF__New Item__Pcs_Qt__2D12A970' and i am not able to delete the constraint because it contains a space in between.Is there any work around for this.
I tried to delete the constraint by using the query
alter table [new item]
drop constraint 'DF__New Item__Pcs_Qt__2D12A970'
but I am getting the exception,
Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 2
Incorrect syntax near 'DF__New Item__Pcs_Qt__2D12A970'.
Transact SQL :: Row Level Locking In Server
Apr 22, 2015We have one table.We have updated the status for one column to 1 and we did not committed the transaction. Can we do an another update on another row.
In below example i am updating GEO_D and transaction is not committed. Now my requirement is we have to update other records (not Geo_D). If try to update GEo_D it should wait.
IF OBJECT_ID('TEMPDB..##TEMP_STSTUS') IS NOT NULL
DROP TABLE ##TEMP_STSTUS
CREATE TABLE ##TEMP_STSTUS
(
ID INT IDENTITY(1,1)
,NAME VARCHAR(10)
,STSTUS VARCHAR(10)
)
INSERT INTO ##TEMP_STSTUS SELECT 'GEO_D','0'
[Code] ....
Transact SQL :: UPDATE Statement Failing On Unique Key Constraint
Jul 9, 2015I'm trying to update rows in a simple table that has a UNIQUE KEY CONSTRAINT defined on one of its columns. Here is the DDL for the table:
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[SEC_USER](
[SEC_USER_ID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[USER_CODE] [varchar](100) NOT NULL,
[USER_NAME] [varchar](128) NOT NULL,
[EMP_CODE] [varchar](6) NOT NULL,
[Code] ....
When trying to execute the UPDATE statement the query fails with a constraint violation error:
Violation of UNIQUE KEY constraint 'UQ__SEC_USER__A039F1EE62FE8444'. Cannot insert duplicate key in object 'dbo.SEC_USER'. The duplicate key value is (34337).
What has me baffled is that I'm not doing any insert. Also, the value that it's referencing - 34337 - doesn't exist in the table at all. I'd rather not drop the constraint.
Transact SQL :: Check Constraint With UDF To Prevent Overlapping Dates?
Oct 6, 2015I am trying to create a check constraint that prevents entry of a date range that overlaps any other date range in the table. The below example script results in the error message: The INSERT statement conflicted with the CHECK constraint "ck_dt_overlap". what I am doing wrong?
CREATE TABLE t1 (d1 date,d2 date)
go
create function dbo.dt_overlap (@d1 date, @d2 date) RETURNS BIT
AS
BEGIN
IF EXISTS (SELECT 1 from t1 where d1 between @d1 and @d2 or d2 between @d1 and @d2)
RETURN 1
RETURN 0
END
go
alter table t1 add constraint ck_dt_overlap CHECK (dbo.dt_overlap(d1,d2)=0)
go
insert into t1 values ('2015-01-01','2015-02-01')
insert into t1 values ('2015-01-15','2015-02-15')
--BOTH inserts result in the following message: The INSERT statement conflicted with the CHECK constraint "ck_dt_overlap".
drop table t1
drop function dbo.dt_overlap
Transact SQL :: Database Constraint Check On Table With Reference Key
Jun 11, 2015CREATE TABLE PRODUCT_SALES
(
Salesmanid BIGINT,
Productid BIGINT
)
INSERT INTO PRODUCT_SALES (Salesmanid,Productid) VALUES (1,1)
INSERT INTO PRODUCT_SALES (Salesmanid,Productid) VALUES (1,2)
INSERT INTO PRODUCT_SALES (Salesmanid,Productid) VALUES (1,3)
SELECT * FROM PRODUCT_SALES
/* SalesmanID is reference key from Sales Master and ProductID is reference key from Product Master. How should i restrict user through DB with any constraint check, if user tries to enter
INSERT INTO PRODUCT_SALES (Salesmanid,Productid) VALUES (1,2),
It should throw error , if possible user defined message would be more useful.
Transact SQL :: Check Constraint On Switching In Table Not Working?
Jul 7, 2015I have a table which has been partitioned on BIGINT column.
Partitioned_Table (ID BIGINT, Name VARCHAR(10), Gender VARCHAR(2))
I have a left range partition function on ID column.
CREATE PARTITION FUNCTION Partition_Function ( BIGINT )
AS RANGE LEFT
FOR VALUES ( '20150601000', '20150602000', '20150603000' );
That means the first partition is ID >= 20150601000 to ID < 20150602000.
I have to switch in a table into an empty partition.
Switching_In_Table(ID BIGINT, Name VARCHAR(10), Gender VARCHAR(2))
Before the switch in, I am creating a CHECK constraint on Switching_In_Table CHECK(ID LIKE '20150625%') Can I use like clause in this scenario?
Transact SQL :: Case Expressions May Only Be Nested To Level 10
Aug 5, 2015I have a query which works absolutely fine when connecting to an actual server:
WITH CLAIMDATA AS(
SELECT DISTINCT
DB_NAME() AS DBName,
'UA' AS Client,
POLICY AS KMPONO,
[code]...
If i change the connector to REPLPROD (which is a linked server): From REPLPROD.XUNMDTAUAI.dbo.UPPOREP UP INNER JOIN REPLPROD.XUNMDTAUAI.dbo.UKKMREP UK
I get the error:
Msg 8180, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Statement(s) could not be prepared.
Msg 125, Level 15, State 4, Line 1
Case expressions may only be nested to level 10.
Transact SQL :: Script To Collect TPS In Instance Level?
Oct 22, 2015I have a requirements to collect Transactions per second from a sql server instances level. Any script to collect TPS in the instance level ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedTransact SQL :: Retrieve Descendants With Depth Level
Nov 22, 2015I have a table of Affiliates, each Affiliate can have a ParentId, which refers to another Affiliate. How can I retrieve all children of a given Affiliate, along with their depth level? I have this query which selects the total number of descendants of a given Affiliate, but I need to select all the children + their depth level, up to a certain level.
WITH Descendants AS(
SELECT RootId = Id, Id
FROM Affiliates
UNION ALL
SELECT RootId, Af.Id
FROM Descendants
[Code] .........
What I want to achieve is a statement that has 3 parameters: RefererId, StartLevel, and EndLevel.
I need a statement that selects all the specified Affiliate.ReferrerId's descendants including their level distance from the referrer, filtered by the StartLevel and EndLevel (WHERE CurrentLevel >= StartLevel AND CurrentLevel <= EndLevel ).
Transact SQL :: Group By On A Transaction At Line Item Level?
May 20, 2015I need to group by transactions at line item level. As the each item in the transaction may belong to different category and I'musing case statement to identify particular category for one column , I'm using sub-query to retrieve the results at item level.
Here is the code:
SELECT
fs.TransactionId
,fs.DateKey
,dc.FirstName
,dc.LastName
,dc.Company
[code]....
Due to case by statement and having multiple category I have to use multiple group by.
select TransactionId
,DateKey
,FirstName
,LastName
,Company
,City
,Sum(CategoryAPurchase) CategoryAPurchase
[code]....
Transact SQL :: Select Lowest Level From Hierarchical Data
Jun 22, 2015I have hierarchical data such as:
Id Level ParentId
1 0 1
2 1 1
3 2 2
4 0 4
5 1 4
6 0 6
7 1 6
8 2 7
9 3 8
10 4 9
11 0 11
As you can see even the parent element has parentId(in this case id = parentid)
How can I select the lowest level data in the hierarchy and get this result:
Id Level ParentId
3 2 2
5 1 4
10 4 9
11 0 11
Transact SQL :: Left Outer Join And Transaction Isolation Level
Nov 30, 2015We have a service that inserts some rows into a parent table (P) and child table (C). This operation is atomic and performed within a transaction.
We also have a service that queries these tables such that rows are (should only be) returned from P where there are no children for that parent.
The SQL that performs this is simplified below:
SELECT P.SomeCol
FROM P
LEFT OUTER JOIN C ON P.PKofP_Value = C.PkofP_Value
WHERE
C.PkofPValue IS NULL
AND P.SomeOtherCol=0
Our expectation is that the query service should only return rows from P where there are no rows in C.
However, this seems not to be the case, and occasionally we find that rows from P are returned where there are matching rows in C.
We are sure that the process that inserts rows into P and C does so within a single transaction.
We have traced this with SQLTrace and can see the txn stag and committing and all operations using the same transactionid within the transaction.
We are running the default isolation level committed.
In SQLTrace we can see the query process start, the inserter process start and complete and then the query process continue (after presumably being blocked).
So how can the query process "miss" the child rows and return the parent from the above query?
Is it possible that, in this isolation level, the inserter process can block the query process such that when the inserter process commits and when the query process continues it does not see the child rows inserted because they were inserted in the table/index "behind" where the query process has already read - some kind of phantom phenomenon?
Transact SQL :: Adding A Column To A Large (100 Million Rows) Table With Default Constraint?
Apr 24, 2013IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT TOP 1 1 FROM dbo.syscolumns WHERE id = OBJECT_ID(N'dbo.Employee) and name = 'DoNotCall')
BEGIN
ALTER TABLE [dbo].[Employee] ADD [DoNotCall] bit not null Constraint DoNot_Call_Default DEFAULT 0
IF ( @@ERROR <> 0 )
GOTO QuitWithRollback
END
It just takes a LOT of time in SQL Server Management studio. I have to cancel the query and cancelling takes a whole lot time. I am using SQL Server 2008.
Transact SQL :: Any Reason For Difference In Order Of Columns Between Index Of Constraint And Its Statistics Definition?
Sep 5, 2015I am really puzzled by an apparent difference between table index key column order and its statistics order. I was under understanding that index statistics mirror index definition. However, in my db 2470 index ordinal definitions match statistics definition but 66 do not. I also can reproduce such discrepancy in 2008 R2, 2012 and 2014.
As per definition,
stats_column_id
int
1-based ordinal within set of stats columns
This script duplicates this for me.
BEGIN TRAN
GO
use tempdb
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[ItemProperties](
[itmID] [int] NOT NULL,
[cpID] [smallint] NOT NULL,
[ipuID] [tinyint] NOT NULL,
[Code] ....
The result I get is this:
object_id stats_name
stats_column_list
1525580473 PK_ItemProperties_itmID_ipuID_cpID itmID, cpID, ipuID,
and
object_id index_name
index_column_list
1525580473 PK_ItemProperties_itmID_ipuID_cpID itmID, ipuID, cpID,
Also a query I used to discover this in my db is:
WITH stat AS
(
SELECT
s.object_id
,s.name as stats_name
,(
SELECT
c.name + ', ' as [data()]
FROM sys.stats_columns as sc
[Code] .....
Named Constraint Is Not Supported For This Type Of Constraint (not Null)
May 13, 2008Hi, all.
I am trying to create table with following SQL script:
Code Snippet
create table Projects(
ID smallint identity (0, 1) constraint PK_Projects primary key,
Name nvarchar (255) constraint NN_Prj_Name not null,
Creator nvarchar (255),
CreateDate datetime
);
When I execute this script I get following error message:
Error source: SQL Server Compact ADO.NET Data Provider
Error message: Named Constraint is not supported for this type of constraint. [ Constraint Name = NN_Prj_Name ]
I looked in the SQL Server Books Online and saw following:
CREATE TABLE (SQL Server Compact)
...
< column_constraint > ::= [ CONSTRAINT constraint_name ] { [ NULL | NOT NULL ] | [ PRIMARY KEY | UNIQUE ] | REFERENCES ref_table [ ( ref_column ) ] [ ON DELETE { CASCADE | NO ACTION } ] [ ON UPDATE { CASCADE | NO ACTION } ]
As I understand according to documentation named constraints should be supported, however error message says opposite. I can rephrase SQL script by removing named constraint.
Code Snippet
create table Projects(
ID smallint identity (0, 1) constraint PK_Projects primary key,
Name nvarchar (255) not null,
Creator nvarchar (255),
CreateDate datetime
);
This script executes correctly, however I want named constraints and this does not satisfy me.
Column Level Or Database Level Encryption/decryption....
Jan 16, 2008I want to perform column level and database level encryption/decryption....
Does any body have that code written in C# or VB.NET for AES-128, AES-192, AES-256 algorithms...
I have got code for single string... but i want to encrypt/decrypt columns and sometimes the whole database...
Can anybody help me out...
If you have Store procedure in SQL for the same then also it ll do...
Thanks in advance
High Level && Detail Level Design Documents
Nov 19, 2007
Hi,
AM in need of SSRS 2005 design documents for a project purpose. Can somebody let me know where can i find these documents? Thanks in advance
Unique Constraint Error When There Is No Constraint
May 13, 2008We are using SQL CE 3.5 on tablet PCs, that synchs with our host SQL 2005 Server using Microsoft Synchronization Services. On the tablets, when inserting a record, we get the following error:
A duplicate value cannot be inserted into a unique index. [ Table name = refRegTitle,Constraint name = PK_refRegTitle
But the only PK on this table is RegTitleID.
The table structure is:
[RegTitleID] [int] IDENTITY(1,1) NOT NULL,
[RegTitleNumber] [int] NOT NULL,
[RegTitleDescription] [varchar](200) NOT NULL,
[FacilityTypeID] [int] NOT NULL,
[Active] [bit] NOT NULL,
The problem occurs when a Title Number is inserted and a record with that number already exists. There is no unique constraint on Title Number.
Has anyone else experienced this?
Transactions = Table Level Or Row Level ?
Nov 29, 2006When you utilize transactions in ADO.NET are the locks put on the entire TABLE used or at the row level?
For instance if you do a SELECT within a transaction if you only pull 5 rows out of a 1000 row table can you just make it lock the rows that have been pulled? It seems like it locks the entire table?
Thanks
What Is Low Level And High Level Locking
May 3, 2007Hi, Can anybody please explain me, what is low level and high level locking in SQL Server 2005 database.
Also what is the name of process which converts low level locking into high level locking and vise versa.
-Sanjeev
Statement Level Vs. Row Level Triggers
Jul 20, 2005Hi..I'd very much appreciate it if someone would tell me how to translatea statement level trigger written in Oracle to its equivalent (if there isone)in MS SQL Server. Ditto for a row level trigger.If this is an old topic, I apologize. I'm very much a newbie to SQL Server.Regards,Allan M. Hart
View 2 Replies View RelatedAnalysis :: Calculate Members At Certain Level In One Hierarchy As Sum Of Corresponding Members At A Certain Level
Jun 4, 2015Problem setting is a geography dimension with multiple user defined hierarchies in SSAS 2008.
Ex.:
Hierarchy 1 (political territory): level 6 --> level 5 --> level 4 --> level 3 (state) --> level 2 --> level 1
Hierarchy 2 (sales territory): level 4 --> level 3 --> level 2 (sales region) --> level 1
...
Hierarchy 9
The relationship between state and sales region is n:1, i.e. one state belongs to exactly one sales region, and one sales region can consists of one or multiple states. Unfortunatly I can't define this attribute relationsship in the dimension because it would lead to a diamond-shaped relationsship without a user-defined-hierarchy to back it up. So far that isn't much of a problem, user don't drill down from sales region to state. But now I want to define a calculated member that multiplies a measure from the main measure group with another measure from a weighting factor measure group at the state level and above. The granularity attribute of the geography dimension in the dimension usage tab of the weighting factor measuregroup is the state.
So far what I've got is:
CREATE MEMBER Currentcube.Measures.[weighted measure state and above] AS NULL;
SCOPE (Measures.[weighted measure state and above],
Descendants(geography.[political territory].[all member],3,SELF_AND_BEFORE),
Descendants(geography.[salesterritory].[all member],2,SELF_AND_BEFORE),
... Descendants(geography.[hierarchy 9].[all member],1,SELF_AND_BEFORE)); this = sum(existing(geography.[political territory].state.members), measures.[main measure group measure] * measures.[weighting measure group measure]);END SCOPE;
This works from a functional point of view, but is rather slow when querying any other hierarchy than the political territory hierarchy, because SSAS first goes down from the state level to the key attribute of the geography dimension, and then aggregates from there to the sales region.In other words, I want SSAS to resolve the relationsship (which state belongs to which sales region) through the dimension, and not through the fact, and apply the calculation afterwards. Like some kind of currency conversion, but only from a certain level upwards.
The SSE Provider Did Not Find The Database File Specified In The Connection String. At The Configured Trust Level (below High Trust Level), The SSE Provider Can Not Automatically Create The Database File.
Aug 31, 2007The problem that I am having is that with Visual Web Developer I am creating a webpage and having it directly put online, so for example when I start a new ASP.NET page, I select the location to be HTTP, with the location http://MYWEBSERVER/Website and for the language and Visual BasicI notice a couple of things, first that there is no longer a a link under the Main toolbar "Website" selection called the ASP.NET configuration. So how can I configure what I want to have users be able to do? It seems that this choice is only available if I am building the ASP.NET page on my "localhost". So that is the first problem. So I am able to get the pages to work, atleast the things such as the textboxes to show up etc, (Even things as advanced as the "Login" box). How ever when I try to get someone to try to login I am taken to a page that has an server error. The error is:
"The SSE Provider did not find the database file specified in the connection string. At the configured trust level (below High trust level), the SSE provider can not automatically create the database file. "
The Stack Trace Errors are at the bottom. I think this is happening because the automatically generated databases are not getting built online as they are on my computer. On my computer I have MSSQL express. So either the databases are not getting built for some reason, (and I think that is the case as I don't see any in the folder). So I think that somehow I have to create a database on my server, and then somehow configure the ASP.NET file, perhaps in the Web.Config file to look for that new database. Is this the correct methodology? Is there some simpler way that I can just somehow upload things as they are and have them work correctly on my server? The error says that either the Server did not find the database or that the trust level was insufficient. I don't think that is it as I just looked again and I don't see any .MDF files. So how would I go about getting this to work right? Is there a way to do this with MySQL also? So that I don't have to use MSSQL? My server only allows 1 DataBase for that.
Thanks and I hope my question makes sense. It is basically how can I get it to be able to create and check users etc. online?
Brian
[ProviderException: The SSE Provider did not find the database file specified in the connection string. At the configured trust level (below High trust level), the SSE provider can not automatically create the database file.] System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHelper.EnsureSqlExpressDBFile(String connectionString) +2555237 System.Web.DataAccess.SqlConnectionHelper.GetConnection(String connectionString, Boolean revertImpersonation) +87 System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.GetPasswordWithFormat(String username, Boolean updateLastLoginActivityDate, Int32& status, String& password, Int32& passwordFormat, String& passwordSalt, Int32& failedPasswordAttemptCount, Int32& failedPasswordAnswerAttemptCount, Boolean& isApproved, DateTime& lastLoginDate, DateTime& lastActivityDate) +1121 System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.CheckPassword(String username, String password, Boolean updateLastLoginActivityDate, Boolean failIfNotApproved, String& salt, Int32& passwordFormat) +105 System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.CheckPassword(String username, String password, Boolean updateLastLoginActivityDate, Boolean failIfNotApproved) +42 System.Web.Security.SqlMembershipProvider.ValidateUser(String username, String password) +83 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login.OnAuthenticate(AuthenticateEventArgs e) +160 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login.AttemptLogin() +105 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Login.OnBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs e) +99 System.Web.UI.Control.RaiseBubbleEvent(Object source, EventArgs args) +35 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.OnCommand(CommandEventArgs e) +115 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +163 System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.System.Web.UI.IPostBackEventHandler.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) +7 System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument) +11 System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(NameValueCollection postData) +33 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +5102
Help-Constraint
May 29, 2001Hi,
I am trying to figure out how to do this.
For each row, only one out of two columns(id1,id2) should be populated. So if the id1 column is already populated and the application tries to fill in something for id2 then we just simply don't want to allow that and vice versa.
I am thinking triggers is the way to go. What do you think?
thanks
Rozina
Constraint Help!!
Sep 21, 2000using alter table syntax how can i insert the field TramingChoiceCd
Extend the constraint on NetwkChannel table UQ__TetwkChannel__50FB042B to include TramingChoiceCd
Constraint
Nov 30, 2001Which is the preferred method Rule, Check Constraint or Trigger?
I want to set a column to todays date when the column is = "T"
else when "F" set it to a future date. Each time there is a insertion into
the table.
Constraint
Jun 7, 2004I have a varchar field in a table.I want to restrict the entries in that field as "yes" or "no" nothing else.No record will be allowed for this field without yes or no.My question is is it possible without using any trigger for the table?I want to do it with the help of a constraint.
View 1 Replies View RelatedConstraint Ddl
Oct 13, 2004When I see desing table option in enterprise manager of a table I don't see any constraints, but when I extract ddl I can see all 6 of them. They are all unique constraints not the check constraints. Is this normal. I am new to SQL Server and would appreciate some explanation.
Thanks