Transact SQL :: Value In Field Not Returned By WHERE Clause
Nov 18, 2015
I have a small table named Exclude_Cusno_Item that has a varchar(29)Â field named
ITEM. When I query the table to show all of the records like this:
Select * from Exclude_Cusno_Item
The result set contains a record with 'AAA' in the ITEM field. However, where I write a query with a WHERE clause to select this specific 'AAA' record like this:
Select * from Exclude_Cusno_Item where item = 'AAA'
I get no results. What could be happening that would prevent the 'AAA' record from appearing in the result set of this query? Note that the 'AAA' entry has no trailing or leading blanks.
I have a quite big SQL query which would be nice to be used using UNION betweern two Select and Where clauses. I noticed that if both Select clauses have Where part between UNION other is ignored. How can I prevent this?
I found a article in StackOverflow saying that if UNION has e.g. two Selects with Where conditions other one will not work. [URL] ....
I have installed SQL Server 2014 and I tried to use tricks mentioned in StackOverflow's article but couldn't succeeded.
Any example how to write two Selects with own Where clauses and those Selects are joined with UNION?
I would like to know how i can handle multiple columns returned by a subquery via IN clause in case of sql server 2005. I can do that in oracle by using the following statement:
DELETE FROM TEST1 WHERE (ID, ID1) NOT IN (SELECT ID,ID1 FROM TEST2);
We have multiple employees assigned to the same assignment sometimes, and my query is skewed as that if there are 2 people assigned to the ssame assigment I can only see the amt of time worked for the 1st person. Â What should I do to remedy this?
Ouput I am receiving is
BadgeNum - Assignment -- FullName --TimeworkToday A2323 Â ---- Accident Reconstruction ---- Football Helmet ---- .50 AB12 ---- Accident Reconstruction ---- Brown Shoe ---- Null AB66 ----- Accident Reconstruction ---- Black Shoe ---- Null ABB28 ---- Accident Reconstruction ---- White Shoe ---- Null
--And now here it's a new assignment so timeworktoday is populating
Hi, I've got what is probably a simple question, but for the life of me I cannot figure it out and it is starting to do my head in . I have the following query:- Select e.intEmployeeID AS ID, e.txtFirstName AS [First Name], e.txtLastName As [Last Name], e.txtMobile As [Mobile], i.txtWorkEmail as from EMPLOYEE AS e INNER JOIN EMPLOYEE_INFORMATION AS i ON i.intEmployeeID = e.intEmployeeID WHERE (((e.blnActive = -1) AND (e.txtFirstName Like '%b%')) OR ((e.blnActive = -1) AND (e.txtLastName Like '%b%')) ) ORDER By e.txtFirstName In my database, the field blnActive is a BIT field. When I try to run this query, I get no results returned. If I remove the (e.blnActive = -1) WHERE statement segment, I get the correct results. The field blnActive contains -1 for every record but I cannot work out why it will not return these records .... aaarrrrggghhhh Thanks to those who feel my pain !!
In my database I have an Audit table, that keeps track of teams worked upon the same record in a workflow.I need to find out how many records have been returned to the first team for correction ?The column 'Status' is numbered from 1 to 6 and Column 'EditTime' saves the time when record has been edited.how many records have been returned for correction and identify those records.
here is my business/data object for some reason I only get the first character back, say value is Charlie, I only get C public string GetUserName(long UserId) { try { string userName;
DiscussionDB data = new DiscussionDB(); List paramlist = new List(); paramlist.Add(data.CreateParameter("@UserId", UserId)); paramlist.Add(data.CreateParameter("@UserName", "", ParameterDirection.Output, DbType.String, 20)); data.ExecuteNonQuery("dbo.Discussion_User_Name", ref paramlist); userName = paramlist[1].Value.ToString();
return userName; } catch { throw; } }
ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[Discussion_User_Name] @UserId bigint, @UserName varchar(20) output AS SET NOCOUNT ON
SET @UserName = (Select [Name] from Discussion_Member WHERE UserID = @UserID)
if (@UserName is null or @UserName = '') BEGIN SET @UserName = (Select UserName from Membership_User WHERE UserID = @UserID) END
Below is a snippet of MS SQL inside ASP that retieves Commodity info such as product names and related information and returns the results in an ASP Page. My problem is that with certain searches, elements returned in the synonym field repeat. For instance, on a correct search I get back green, red, blue, and yellow which is correct. On another similar search different commodity say for material, I get Plastic, Glass,Sand - Plastic, Glass,Sand - Plastic Glass Sand. I want to remove the repeating elements returned in this field. I hope this makes sense.
PS I tried to use distinct but with no luck I want just one of each in the example below.
Thanks in Advance!
Scott
==============================
SQL = "" SQL = "SELECT B.CIMS_MSDS_NUM," & _ "A.COMMODITY_NUMBER, " & _ "B.CIMS_TRADE_NME," & _ "B.CIMS_MFR_NME," & _ "B.CIMS_MSDS_PREP_DTE," & _ "B.APVL_CDE," & _ "COALESCE(C.REGDMATLCD,'?') AS DOTREGD," & _ "COALESCE( D.CIMS_TRADE_SYNM,'NO SYNONYMS') AS SYNONYM, " & _ "A.MSDS_CMDTY_VERIF, " & _ "A.CATALOG_ID " & _ "FROM ( MATEQUIP.VMSDS_CMDTY A " & _ " RIGHT OUTER JOIN MATEQUIP.VCIMS_TRD_PROD_INF B " & _ " ON A.CIMS_MSDS_NUM = B.CIMS_MSDS_NUM " & _ " LEFT OUTER JOIN MATEQUIP.VDOT_TRADE_PROD C " & _ " ON A.CIMS_MSDS_NUM = C.MSDSNUM " & _ " LEFT OUTER JOIN MATEQUIP.VCIMS_TRD_PROD_SYN D " & _ " ON B.CIMS_MSDS_NUM = D.CIMS_MSDS_NUM) "
I would like to use sp_send_dbmail, but I only want to send mail if there are any records returned.
I have found some solutions, but you must always first check if there is any record and later you can call "sp_send_dbmail" and within you must again query database for results.
What I want to do is to query database just once, because I dont want to use server performance two times. Query is bit complicated.
I have two tables A and B, A has 8000 and B has 8122 records. I want to see what records are missing. I tried EXCEPT and it returned zero rows. I used where non exists also still no records.
How can i group the data returned by statement below by "Dept" field. I have already tried to group it like shown below but that doesn't seem to work for me. Any help. cmd_select = New SqlCommand("SELECT Incident_id,Dept From Report_Incident Group By Dept,Incident_id", myconnection_string)
I am trying to pull results from an SQL Server DB into an dataset where a particular field (SMALLDATETIME) is within a particular date range. The code I was using worked fine when the database was in Access. I have made several changes already but am still getting 0 results returned when there is data that should be returned.
I was using in Access: Dim StrSQL = "SELECT ID FROM myTable WHERE myDateField>=#" & startDate & "# AND myDateField<=#" & stopDate & "# ORDER BY ID" I have changed this for SQL Server to: Dim StrSQL = "SELECT ID FROM myTable WHERE myDateField>='01/01/2003 00:00:01' AND myDateField<='01/01/2004 23:59:59' ORDER BY ID" But I am always returned 0 results even if the date range should return plenty of data. I have also tried using the BETWEEN structure with the same result.
Is there a particular format for the date I am comparing with? Am I missing something else in my query?
The connection / permissions and everything else are correct as I can read and write data to the database in numerous other pages. It is just this date comparison that is not working.
Many thanks for any help or comments you can provide.
I have a table (edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2) of 40,000 MA_NUM. Â
I want to find occurrences of those specific MA_NUM in another table (edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE) with specific attributes (CONTRACT_NUM = '593' and TRANSACT_STATUS_CD = 'D'). Â
When I run the query below it returns 4 million rows. Â How can I write a query that will return the 40,000 MA_NUM (in edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2) with the sum total of MA_PAID_AMT associated with each?
SELECT edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.MA_NUM, Â Â Â Â edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.MA_PAID_AMT FROM Â edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE Â Â Â Â JOIN edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2 Â Â Â Â Â ON edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.MA_NUM = edw_sbx_bt.jjenkins_OVERAGE2.MA_NUM WHERE Â edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.CONTRACT_NUM = '593' Â Â Â Â AND edw_ar_fl.ARTBASE.TRANSACT_STATUS_CD = '
Can anyone tell me what the heck this is trying to tell me. I have 3 datasets I'm working with so there are errors for each here:
[rsMissingFieldInDataSet] The data set €˜Revenue_By_Client€™ contains a definition for the Field €˜Branch€™. This field is missing from the returned result set from the data source.
[rsErrorReadingDataSetField] The data set €˜Revenue_By_Client€™ contains a definition for the Field €˜Branch€™. The data extension returned an error during reading the field.
[rsMissingFieldInDataSet] The data set €˜Main_Dataset_AZ€™ contains a definition for the Field €˜PostedAmount_InHouse€™. This field is missing from the returned result set from the data source.
[rsErrorReadingDataSetField] The data set €˜Main_Dataset_AZ€™ contains a definition for the Field €˜PostedAmount_InHouse€™. The data extension returned an error during reading the field.
I have a very strange situation. I've increased the size of an NVARCHAR field from 8 to 9 in a database table. The format of the data that I enter will either be an 8 character field (123456-8) or a 9 character field (1234567-9). The '-' is critical.
It used to only accept the 8 character version, but after increasing the field size, if I try to insert the 9 character field version, it gets truncated after the '-', as though it's still only allowing 8 characters. But that only occurs when I include the '-' or other such characters like '#'. If I try to insert 1234567a9, it works. The following explains the outcomes:
Inserted Value -> Result in table
123456-8 -> 123456-8Â Â Â Â Â Â *Correct 1234567-9 -> 1234567-Â Â Â Â Â *Wrong 123456789 -> 123456789Â Â Â *Correct 1234567#9 -> 1234567#Â Â Â Â *Wrong 1234567a9 -> 1234567a9Â Â Â *Correct
Why is it that characters such as '-' and '#' are truncating the value, but only if the string is 9 chars long?
I'm currently using a direct t-sql insert statement in SQLExpress. The field is a simple NVARCHAR(9) field.
When querying a bit field, I am encountering a problem with MS SQLServer returning a larger number of records for a table than theactual number of records that exist within that table.For example, my customer table has 1 million unique records, so theresults of the following query are as such:select count(customer_nbr) from customer = 1,000,000There is bit field in the customer table that denotes whether acustomer has placed an order with us called. That flag is calledorder_flagIf I run the following query:select count(customer_nbr) from customer where order_flag = 1The result is 3,000,000 records.There is no logical way that this is possible, as my table onlycontains 1,000,000 unique records and the number of customers with anorder should be a subset of this.If a run the above query with a distinct before customer number, I getthe results I want:select count(distinct customer_nbr) from customer where order_flag = 1600,000 records.So while I can get to the answer I want, I have no idea why I amreturning incorrect values if I don't select distinct.Can anyone help? I checked microsoft support and message boards buthaven't seen anything.I should note that the bit field is indexed.I am not sure if that isthe problem or not.
I got this error for a calculated field that calls a public function of a custom assembly based on the report parameter values. The return type is an array of double.
Does SSRS 2005 supports the type double for a field? Can the data source of a field in a dataset be an array? Is there a way to pass the array to a field by reference and display the values at runtime?
I would appreciate any help since I could not find anything helpful on the internet and Microsoft document!
Declare @date date = '2015-02-12' Column in table datetime format
when i  use  where clause WHERE @Date > ValidateDateTime ,  got no rows  but when i changed ValidateDateTime > @date, getting result as expected, this behavior because of data format or  something else.
When building stored procs, I typically have several nullable parameters. Then in the where clause I will either do this
WHERE (@MyParam IS NULL OR MyColumn = @MyParam) or this: WHERE MyColumn = COALESCE(@MyParam, MyColumn) Lately, I've noticed that either of these imposes a performance penalty. In other words, if I change the first one to WHERE MyColumn = @MyParam
without the IS NULL, it is noticeably faster. If I only have one or two nullable parameters, I can separate the logic using IF/ELSE, but it becomes huge if I have a bunch of nullable params.I've looked at the execution plans.
Hi, i have a stored procedure like this: CREATE PROCEDURE dbo.spQuery1
@dynamicField nvarchar(10)
AS
SELECT id, productName, productDescription
FROM products
WHERE @dynamicField = 'True'
RETURN The products table has id, productName, productDescription, property1, property2, property3 fields So my query variable should be, for example, "property1" and the result should be every row with "property1" set to true... but it doesnt work with the sql like this... any help?
m.TOTAL_MNTH_INCOME + m.CO_TOTAL_MNTH_INCOME as income1,income1 * 12 as income2,Round(income2, 1000) as income3,income3 / 1000 as income
,a.fielda ,b.filedb from tablea a, tableb b where a.name = b.name' and income <> b.income
I can probably string all 4 of my calculations together and say as income. I just copied it that way since that is how the SAS code is written but my big Q is can I use the derived field income from my calculation in my where statement.
I am trying to update a table and then also use OUTPUT clause to capture some of the columns. The code that I am using is something like the one below
UPDATE s SET Exception_Ind = 1 OUTPUT s.Master_Id, s.TCK_NR INTO #temp2 FROM Master_Summary s INNER JOIN Exception d ON d.Id = LEFT(s.Id, 8) AND d.Barcode_Num = s.TCK_NR WHERE s.Exception_Ind IS NULL
The above code is throwing an error as follows:
Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113 The multi-part identifier "s.Master_Id" could not be bound. Msg 4104, Level 16, State 1, Procedure Process_Step3, Line 113
The multi-part identifier "s.TCK_NR" could not be bound.
I have a table Customer with column name "SerNo" the value of SerNo column is like below.
Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3 Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3 Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3 Metz-2d9c957d-ca1c-4b27-adf8-39fef552f3f7 Metz-2d9c957d-ca1c-4b27-adf8-39fef552f3f7 Circle Graphics-a48712c1-2769-4964-ab89-4c1fb2949cf3
[code]...
I want to join it with nother table "Order"Â which has a SerNo column but does not have first part of SerNo.
I'm struggling with the syntax for qualifying an openquery's results with a where clause. I copied this from examples on the web but get the error  incorrect syntax near '32810'.
declare @sysid varchar(50) = '32810C534D01C920E7CB07EBC0A80122' declare @sql varchar(500) = 'select * from OPENQUERY(WAREHOUSE,''select * from xxx.yyyy where sys_id = ''' + @sysid + ''''')' exec(@sql) selecting @sql it looks like select * from OPENQUERY(WAREHOUSE,'select * from xxx.yyyy where sys_id = '32810C534D01C920E7CB07EBC0A80122'')
I have a scenario where the End User is going to select two parameters. @AgentID and @Location If the End User selects @AgentID parameter, in my WHERE clause, I do not want to check the location condition. By default, the agent knows their location already.
If the End User select @Location parameter, in my WHERE clause, I still want to check the Agent condition.
@AgentID parameter would populate either with "All" or their actual agent# (76754 for example).
@Location parameter would populate either with "All" or their actual location (Birmingham or Bessemer for example)Sample of my current WHERE clause:
WHERE Â Â gl.ReceiptDate >= @BeginDate and gl.ReceiptDate < DATEADD(D,1,@EndDate) Â AND gl.AgentId = CASE WHEN @AgentID = 'All' THEN gl.AgentID ELSE @AgentID END Â AND gl.Location = @Location
I have this SP that works, except I need to add another field value for the WHERE clause. As you can see I have "WM" but I need to add "PR", and those two are definitely in the table field. I've tried a variety of syntax arrangements using the AND operator, the OR operator, the & operator, just a comma between the two, nothing between the two. Can someone please show me what I'm doing wrong. It fileters for "WM" fine, but I also need it to filter in the WHERE clause for "PR". Here is the SP:
CREATE procedure spDemoSchedule (@beginDate varchar(10), @endDate varchar(10), @storeNum int) AS
SELECT Progstats.[Program#], Progstats.KCKOFF, Progstats.ProgramName, Progstats.Parent, Store.[Str#], Store.Status, Progstats.Dept, Store.[Program#], Product.[Item#], Product.[Item] FROM Progstats INNER JOIN Product ON Progstats.[Program#] = Product.[Program#] INNER JOIN Store ON Progstats.[Program#] = Store.[Program#] WHERE Progstats.KCKOFF BETWEEN @beginDate AND @endDate AND Store.[Str#]=@storeNum AND Progstats.CLASS="WM" GO
I've got this set of registers (just an example) after ordering by the first 3 columns:
value_A value_B value_C ID date 1 2 3 YVIR 29/08/2015 1 2 3 ANTE 27/04/2015 1 2 3 REGO 20/02/2015
I need to get as a final result:
value_A value_B value_C ID date 1 2 3 REGO 29/08/2015
In other words, I need to get, after ordering the result by the date field, the most recent date but at the same time the oldest ID in the list.
I've been trying to do this with the group by clause:
select value_A, value_B, value_C, min(ID), max(date) -- or max(ID) from table group by value_A, value_B, value_C
But in the field ID I'm getting the wrong result because this value is been associated with the alphabetic order.
In access this query involves the function LAST, but in SQL I have not found a good way to perform this. And I am asking because I have seen some possible solution but almost all of them involving the UNION operation, but my problem is, this table can have more than 350.000 registers.
This table is update by some one else, I just can access the information and use it as a source.
I have used the below update query. However, its updating only the first value. Like its updating AB with volume when c.Type = ABC, similarly for CD. Its not updating based on the 2nd or the next case condition.  Update XYZ Set AB = a.Amt * (CASE WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN (c.volume)  WHEN c.TYPE = 'DEF' THEN (c.volume)  WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN (c.volume)  Else 0  END),  CD = CASE WHEN c.Type = 'MARGIN' THEN '4105.31'  WHEN c.Type = 'ABC' THEN '123.1'  WHEN c.Type = 'DEF' THEN '234.2' WHEN c.Type = 'GHI' THEN '567.1' END  from table1 a join table2 b  on a.Cust = b.Customer  join table3 c  on b.account = c.account and b.channel =c.channel
Why its not working properly? But if i use Select statement instead of update query its working properly.
I have an existing stored table with duplicate rows that I want to delete.Using a cte gives me
WITH CTE AS ( SELECT rn = ROW_NUMBER() OVER( PARTITION BY employeeid, dateofincident, typeid, description ORDER BY Id ASC), * FROM dbo.TableName ) DELETE FROM cte WHERE rn > 1
This is what I want to do basically. But this is only deleting in my CTE, is there anyway I can update my existing table "TableName" with this, without using temp tables?
I have to build a dynamic query to go over to Oracle and get some data and bring it back via a SQL Server Stored Procedure. How I can create an IN clause passing values and ","s from a SQL Server Temp Table that I have already built.
SET @SQLQuery = @SQLQuery + 'WHERE MEMBER.MEMBER_ID IN (''''' + SELECT MEMBER.MEMBER_ID + ',' FROM #TempTable + '''''Â '
